Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:19:00.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - The implications of humanism for business studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2011

Heiko Spitzeck
Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Michael Pirson
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Wolfgang Amann
Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Shiban Khan
Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Ernst von Kimakowitz
Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

Adopting a humanistic approach within business activities and interactions is of the utmost priority if society and, by extension, we as human beings both in the individual and collective sense are to survive, flourish, and emancipate ourselves.

At first glance, mainstream management literature would appear to be showing encouraging signs of enlightenment across the myriad of leitmotivs that are discerned across such words as “humanism,” “ethics,” “corporate governance,” “social responsibility for business,” and “environmental responsibility.” In fact, if there is a major point of convergence for the many streams of literature, it is the importance of the human person or personal attitudes and behaviors at work. No matter the trend or topic: whether it is about corporate ‘culturalism’ (Deal and Kennedy 1982; Ouchi 1981; Peters and Waterman 1982; Schein 1985 and 1991) or motivation and the valorization of human resources (Archier and Serieyx 1987; Crozier 1989; Peters and Austin 1985; Waterman 1987); whether it is across total quality, the re-introduction of the meaning of work, “empowerment” (Juran and Gryna 1980; Michel 1989; Mintzberg 1989; Peters and Austin 1985; Serieyx 1989) or the realization of the workplace as an area of social interactions and sharing (DePree 1989; Peters 1987; Peters and Austin 1985; Weitzman 1984); or whether it is the various preoccupations with ethics, ethico-spirituality, or other management methods aiming towards cohesion, participation, initiative and creativity at all levels, what stands out most clearly is the insistent call from all quarters to put the human element at the forefront.

Type
Chapter
Information
Humanism in Business , pp. 101 - 122
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agayo, R. 1991. Dr. Deming: The American Who Taught the Japanese about Quality. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Albert, M. 1992. Capitalism against Capitalism. London: Whurr Publishing.Google Scholar
Archier, G. and Serieyx, H. 1987. The Type 3 Company. Aldershot: Gower Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Atlan, H. 1972. “Du bruit comme principe d'auto-organisation,” Communications 18: 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atlan, H. 1985. “Ordre et désordre dans les systèmes naturels,” in Chanlat, A. and Dufour, M. (eds.), La Rupture entre l'entreprise et les hommes. Paris: Les Editions d'organisation, pp. 119–37.Google Scholar
Baechler, J. 1995. Le capitalisme, vol. I, Les origines. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Besançon, A. 1974. L'histoire psychanalytique. Une anthologie. Paris: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beynon, H. 1973. Working for Ford. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Braverman, H. 1974. Labor and Monopoly Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Caillé, A. 1989. Critique de la raison utilitaire, manifeste du MAUSS. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Chanlat, A. and Bédard, R. 1990. “La gestion, une affaire de parole,” in Chanlat, J.-F. (ed.), L'individu dans l'organisation. Les dimensions oubliées. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval, pp. 79–99.Google Scholar
Chanlat, A. and Dufour, M. 1985. La rupture entre l'entreprise et les hommes. Montreal: Quebec-Amérique.Google Scholar
Chanlat, J.-F. (ed.). 1990. L'individu dans l'organisation. Les dimensions oubliées. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval.
Chossudovsky, M. 2003. The Globalization of Poverty (second edition). Oro, ON: Global Outlook.Google Scholar
Clegg, S. R. 1975. Power, Myth And Domination. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Clegg, S. R. 1990. “Pouvoir symbolique, langage et organization,” in Chanlat, J.-F. (ed.), L'individu dans l'organisation. Les dimensions oubliées. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval, pp. 663–81.Google Scholar
Crozier, M. 1989. L'entreprise à l'écoute. Paris: InterEditions.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. 1995. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: Avon.Google Scholar
Deal, T. E. and Kennedy, A. 1982. Corporate Culture: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Dejours, C. 1980. Le travail, usure mentale. Paris: Le Centurion.Google Scholar
Dejours, C. 1990. “Nouveau regard sur la souffrance humaine dans les organizations,” in Chanlat, J.-F. (ed.), L'individu dans l'organisation. Les dimensions oubliées. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval, pp. 687–708.Google Scholar
Dejours, C. 1998. Souffrance en France. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Deming, W. E. 1986. Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT CAES.Google Scholar
DePree, M. 1989. Leadership Is an Art. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Deveureux, G. 1973. Essais d'ethno-psychiatrie générale. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Erikson, E. 1993. Childhood and Society. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Etchegoyen, A. 1990. Les entreprises ont-elles une âme?Paris: Francois Bourrin.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. 1989. The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. 1950. Social Anthropology. London: Cohen & West.Google Scholar
Fromm, E. 1961. Marx's Concept of Man. New York: Frederick Ungar.Google Scholar
Galbraith, J. K. 1987. Economics in Perspective. A Critical History. Boston: Hougton Miflin.Google Scholar
Gasparini, G. 1990. “Temps et Travail en Occident,” in Chanlat, J.-F. (ed.), L'individu dans l'organisation. Les dimensions oubliées. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval, pp. 199–214.Google Scholar
Girin, J. 1982. “Langage en actes et organizations,” Économie et Societé: The ISMEA Proceedings on Management Sciences 3(16): 1559–91.Google Scholar
Girin, J. 1990. “Problèmes de langage dans les organizations,” in Chanlat, J.-F. (ed.), L'individu dans l'organisation. Les dimensions oubliées. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval, pp. 37–78.Google Scholar
Godelier, M. 1974. Rationality and Irrationality in Economics. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Hassard, J. 1988. Time, Work and Organization. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hassard, J. 1990. “Pour un paradigme ethnographique du temps de travail,” in Chanlat, J.-F. (ed.), L'individu dans l'organisation. Les dimensions oubliées. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval, pp. 215–30.Google Scholar
Herzberg, F. 1980. “Humanities: Practical Management Education,” Industry Week 206(7): 69–72.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. 1997. The Passions and the Interests. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kamdem, E. 1990. “Temps et travail en Afrique,” in Chanlat, J.-F. (ed.), L'individu dans l'organisation. Les dimensions oubliées. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval, pp. 231–55.Google Scholar
Kets de Vries, M. and Miller, D. 1984. The Neurotic Organization. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Kołakowski, L. 1987. Histoire du Marxisme, vol. I. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Laplantine, F. 1973. Ethnopsychiatrie générale. Paris: Psychothèque.Google Scholar
Levy, J.-P. 1997. La fabrique de l'Homme. Paris: Éditions Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Liker, J. K. 2004. The Toyota Way. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H. 1964. One Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. New York: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Maslow, A. 1954. Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Maslow, A. 1969. “Toward Humanistic Biology,” American Psychologist 24: 724–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maturana, H. 1992. Tree of Knowledge. Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
Michel, S. 1989. Peut-on gérer les motivations?Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. 1989. Inside Our Strange World of Organisations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. 2005. Managers not MBA's: A Hard Look at the Soft Practice of Managing and Management Development. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
Mitroff, I. and Pauchant, T. 1990. We're So Big and Powerful Nothing Bad Can Happen to Us. New York: Birch Lane Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, G. 1986. Images of Organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Monthoux, P. 1989. “The Moral Philosophy of Management.” Unpublished manuscript, Stockholm University.
Morgan, G. 1986. Images of Organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Morin, E. 1993. Terre-patrie. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Olive, D. 1987. Just Rewards: The Case of Ethical Reform in Business. Toronto: Key Porter Books.Google Scholar
Orgogozo, I. and Serieyx, H. 1989. Changer le Changement. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Ouchi, W. G. 1981. Theory Z: How American Business Can Meet the Japanese Challenge. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Packard, V. 1989. The Ultra Rich: How Much Is Too Much?London: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Pages, M., Bonetti, V., and Gaulejac, V. 1984. L'emprise de l'organisation (third edition). Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Pascale, R. 1990. Managing on the Edge. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Pascale, R. 1996. “Reflections on Honda,” California Management Review 38(4): 112–17.Google Scholar
Perrow, C. 1979. “Organizational Theory in a Society of Organizations.” Paper presented at the symposium “L'administration publique: Perspectives d'avenir Public,” Quebec, May.
Peters, T. and Waterman, R. 1982. In Search of Excellence. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Peters, T. 1987. Thriving on Chaos. San Francisco: Knopf.Google Scholar
Peters, T. and Austin, N. 1985. A Passion of Excellence. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, R. 1979. Working for Capitalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rifkin, J. 1980. The Entropy Law: A New World View. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, R. 1989. “Subjectivity in Social Analysis,” in Culture and Truth. The Remaking of Social Analysis, Boston: Beacon Press, pp. 168–195.Google Scholar
Sainsaulieu, R. 1983. “La regulation culturelle des ensembles organisms,” L'année sociologique 33: 195–217.Google Scholar
Sainsaulieu, R. 1987. “Développement social et création institutionnelle en enterprise,” in Desjeux, D. (ed.), Organisation et management en question(s). Paris: L'Harmattan, pp. 203–21.Google Scholar
Sartre, J.-P. 1948. Existentialism and Humanism. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Sartre, J.-P. 1966. Being and Nothingness. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
Sartre, J.-P. 1976. Critique of Dialectical Reason, vol. I. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Schein, E. 1991. “The Role of the Founder in the Creation of Organizational Culture,” in Frost, P., Moore, L., Louise, M., Lundberg, C., and Martin, J. (eds.), Reframing Organizational Culture. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 14–25.Google Scholar
Schein, E. 1985. Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Serieyx, H. 1989. Le zéro mépris. Paris: InterEditions.Google Scholar
Sievers, B. 1994. Work, Life and Death Itself. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sievers, B. 1986a. “Beyond the Surrogate of Motivation,” Organization Studies 7: 335–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sievers, B. 1986b. “Participation as a Collusive Quarrel over Immortality,” The Journal of SCOS 1(1): 72–82.Google Scholar
Solomon, R. C. and Hanson, K. R. 1985. It's Good Business. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Terkel, D. 1972. Working. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
Turner, B. A. (ed.). 1990. Organizational Symbolism. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRef
Varela, F. J. 1980. Principles of Biological Autonomy. New York: Elsevier North Holland.Google Scholar
Villette, M. 1988. L'homme qui Croyait au Management. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Vincent, J. C. 1990. Des Systèmes et des Hommes. Paris: Les Editions d'organisation.Google Scholar
Waterman, R. 1987. The Renewal Factor. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Weitzman, M. 1984. The Share Economy: Conquering Stagflation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×