Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:27:54.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - Humanism at work: crucial organizational cultures and leadership principles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2011

Heiko Spitzeck
Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Michael Pirson
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Wolfgang Amann
Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Shiban Khan
Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Ernst von Kimakowitz
Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Get access

Summary

Globalization, technological developments, and insecurity regarding the stock market pose considerable challenges for today's organizations. In light of these challenges many managers argue that, in principle, they would like to give employees more room for development and creativity, but must focus on efficiency and cost-cutting. But do humanistic principles and superior business performance really contradict each other? This chapter presents organization cultures that are based on humanistic principles and have been implemented by numerous successful organizations.

In the first part of this chapter we briefly present the philosophical foundations of our approach. Subsequently, we describe how the philosophers' claims can be met in modern organizations. Specifically, we present organizational cultures – the center of excellence cultures – that can be used to implement humanistic principles and have been realized by many exceptional organizations. To illustrate these organizational cultures we provide examples of ways in which well-known business organizations have implemented these organizational cultures. Finally, we present guidelines for managers on how to create the center of excellence cultures in their own organizations, i.e. the principle-based model of leadership.

Philosophical foundations

Fundamental for creating humane organizations are the philosophies of Immanuel Kant (1724–1804), Gotthold Ephraim Lessing (1729–81), and Karl Popper (1902–94).

Kant, a major philosopher of the Enlightenment, stressed man's emergence from his self-imposed immaturity. He emphasized that humans have to “dare to know” (Latin: sapere aude), to think autonomously, i.e. free of the dictates of external authority, to free themselves from immaturity and dependence.

Type
Chapter
Information
Humanism in Business , pp. 260 - 277
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baum, R., Locke, E., and Kirkpatrick, S. 1998. “A Longitudinal Study on the Relation of Vision and Vision Communication to Venture Growth in Entrepreneurial Firms,” Journal of Applied Psychology 83 (February): 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brehm, J. 1966. A Theory of Psychological Reactance. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cohen-Charash, Y. and Spector, P. 2001. “The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 86 (November): 278–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. and Ryan, R. 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dweck, C. 1991. “Self Theories and Goals: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development”, in Dienstbier, K. (ed), The Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Economist. 2006a. “Big and No Longer Blue,” January 21: 15.
Economist. 2006b. “Inculcating Culture,” January 21: 11.
Frankl, V. 1997. Man's Search for Ultimate Meaning. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Frey, Dieter. 1996. “Notwendige Bedingungen für dauerhafte Spitzenleistungen in der Wirtschaft und im Sport: Parallelen zwischen Mannschaftssport und kommerziellen Unternehmen,” in Conzelmann, A., Gabler, H. and Schlicht, W. (eds.), Soziale Interaktionen und Gruppen im Sport: Parallelen zwischen Mannschaftssport und kommerziellen Unternehmen. Cologne: bps Publishers, pp. 3–28.Google Scholar
Frey, D., Jonas, E., and Greitemeyer, T. 2002. “Intervention as a Major Tool of a Psychology of Human Strength: Examples from Organizational Change and Innovation,” in Aspinwall, L. G. and Staudinger, U. M. (eds.), A Psychology of Human Strength: Perspectives on an Emerging Field. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 149–64.Google Scholar
Frey, D., Osswald, S., Peus, C., and Fischer, P. 2006. “Positives Management, ethikorientierte Führung und Center of Excellence: Wie Unternehmenserfolg und Entfaltung der Mitarbeiter durch neue Unternehmens- und Führungskulturen gefördert werden können,” in Ringlstetter, M., Kaiser, S., and Müller-Seitz, G. (eds.), Positives Management. Wiesbaden: Gabler: Edition Wissenschaft, pp. 237–65.Google Scholar
Frey, D., Peus, C., and Jonas, E. 2004. “Soziale Organisationen als Centers of Excellence mit Menschenwürde – Zur Professionalisierung der Mitarbeiter- und Unternehmensführung,” in Maelicke, B. (ed.), Personal als Erfolgsfaktor in der Sozialwirtschaft. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 27–52.Google Scholar
George, W. 2003. Authentic Leadership: Rediscovering the Secrets to Creating Lasting Value. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Geyer, A. and Steyrer, J. 1998. “Transformational Leadership and Objective Performance in Banks,” Applied Psychology: An International Review 47: 397–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackman, J. and Oldham, G., 1980. Work Redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Hertzberg, F. 1966. Work and the Nature of Man. Cleveland, OH: World.Google Scholar
Howell, J. M. and Avolio, B. J. 1993. “Transformational Leadership, Transactional Leadership, Locus of Control, and Support for Innovation: Key Predictors of Consolidated Business-unit Performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology 78: 891–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janis, I. 1982. Groupthink (second edition). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Locke, E. and Latham, G. 2002. “Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation,” American Psychologist 57 (September): 705–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., and Rich, G. A. 2001. “Transformational and Transactional Leadership and Salesperson Performance,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 29(2): 115–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearlin, L. and Kohn, M. 1966. “Social Class, Occupation, and Parental Values: A Cross-National Study,” American Sociological Review 31: 466–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popper, K. 1966. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1999. All Life is Problem Solving. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Popper, K. 2002. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
Rogers, C. 1959. “A Theory of Therapy, Personality, and Interpersonal Relations as Developed in the Client-centered Framework,” in S. Koch (ed.), Psychology, a Study of a Science. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schoenauer, M. and Jessenberger, J. 2005. “Xerox GmbH – From Good to Great,” In D. Kudernatsch and P. Fleschhut (eds.), Management Excellence. Stuttgart: Schaeffer-Poeschel.Google Scholar
Schulz-Hardt, S. and Frey, D. 1997. “Das Sinnprinzip: Ein Standbein des homo psychologicus,” in Mandl, H. (ed.), Bericht über den 40. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie. Goettingen: Hogrefe, pp. 870–6.Google Scholar
Semler, R. 2000. “How We Went Digital without a Strategy,” Harvard Business Review September: 51–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Senge, P. 1994. The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook. New York: Currency Doubleday.Google Scholar
Simons, T. and Robertson, O. 2003. “Why Managers Should Care About Fairness: The Effects of Aggregate Justice Perceptions on Organizational Outcomes,” Journal of Applied Psychology 88: 432–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spector, B. 2003. “HRM at Enron: The Unindicted Co-Conspirator,” Organizational Dynamics 32 (May): 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurow, L. C. 1999. Building Wealth: The New Rules for Individuals, Companies, and Nations in a Knowledge-Based Economy. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. 1994. “Psychological Models of the Justice Motive: Antecedents of Distributive and Procedural Justice,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67: 850–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, T. and DeCremer, D. 2005. “Process-based Leadership. Fair Procedures and Reactions to Organizational Change,” Leadership Quarterly 16: 529–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Useem, M. 2002. “When Your Boss Needs Help: Leading Up and Voicing Concerns,” Personalfuehrung 4: 34–8.Google Scholar
Walumbwa, F., Avolio, B., Gardner, W., Wernsing, T., and Peterson, S. 2008. “Authentic Leadership: Development and Analysis of a Multidimensional Theory-based Measure,” Journal of Management 34 (February): 89–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, M. 1997. Developing Creativity in Organizations. Leicester: BPS Books.Google Scholar
Wiedeking, W. 2007. Don't Follow the Crowd. Munich: Piper.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×