Humanism at work: crucial organizational cultures and leadership principles

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511808395.017

15 - Humanism at work: crucial organizational cultures and leadership principles

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 January 2011

Claudia Peus Dieter Frey

Edited by

Shiban Khan and

Heiko Spitzeck: Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Michael Pirson: Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Wolfgang Amann: Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Shiban Khan: Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland
Ernst von Kimakowitz: Affiliation:
Universität St Gallen, Switzerland

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Globalization, technological developments, and insecurity regarding the stock market pose considerable challenges for today's organizations. In light of these challenges many managers argue that, in principle, they would like to give employees more room for development and creativity, but must focus on efficiency and cost-cutting. But do humanistic principles and superior business performance really contradict each other? This chapter presents organization cultures that are based on humanistic principles and have been implemented by numerous successful organizations.

In the first part of this chapter we briefly present the philosophical foundations of our approach. Subsequently, we describe how the philosophers' claims can be met in modern organizations. Specifically, we present organizational cultures – the center of excellence cultures – that can be used to implement humanistic principles and have been realized by many exceptional organizations. To illustrate these organizational cultures we provide examples of ways in which well-known business organizations have implemented these organizational cultures. Finally, we present guidelines for managers on how to create the center of excellence cultures in their own organizations, i.e. the principle-based model of leadership.

Philosophical foundations

Fundamental for creating humane organizations are the philosophies of Immanuel Kant (1724–1804), Gotthold Ephraim Lessing (1729–81), and Karl Popper (1902–94).

Kant, a major philosopher of the Enlightenment, stressed man's emergence from his self-imposed immaturity. He emphasized that humans have to “dare to know” (Latin: sapere aude), to think autonomously, i.e. free of the dictates of external authority, to free themselves from immaturity and dependence.

Type: Chapter
Information: Humanism in Business , pp. 260 - 277

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808395.017 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baum, R., Locke, E., and Kirkpatrick, S. 1998. “A Longitudinal Study on the Relation of Vision and Vision Communication to Venture Growth in Entrepreneurial Firms,” Journal of Applied Psychology 83 (February): 43–54.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brehm, J. 1966. A Theory of Psychological Reactance. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Cohen-Charash, Y. and Spector, P. 2001. “The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 86 (November): 278–321.CrossRef Google Scholar

Deci, E. and Ryan, R. 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dweck, C. 1991. “Self Theories and Goals: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development”, in Dienstbier, K. (ed), The Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Economist. 2006a. “Big and No Longer Blue,” January 21: 15.

Economist. 2006b. “Inculcating Culture,” January 21: 11.

Frankl, V. 1997. Man's Search for Ultimate Meaning. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Frey, Dieter. 1996. “Notwendige Bedingungen für dauerhafte Spitzenleistungen in der Wirtschaft und im Sport: Parallelen zwischen Mannschaftssport und kommerziellen Unternehmen,” in Conzelmann, A., Gabler, H. and Schlicht, W. (eds.), Soziale Interaktionen und Gruppen im Sport: Parallelen zwischen Mannschaftssport und kommerziellen Unternehmen. Cologne: bps Publishers, pp. 3–28.Google Scholar

Frey, D., Jonas, E., and Greitemeyer, T. 2002. “Intervention as a Major Tool of a Psychology of Human Strength: Examples from Organizational Change and Innovation,” in Aspinwall, L. G. and Staudinger, U. M. (eds.), A Psychology of Human Strength: Perspectives on an Emerging Field. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 149–64.Google Scholar

Frey, D., Osswald, S., Peus, C., and Fischer, P. 2006. “Positives Management, ethikorientierte Führung und Center of Excellence: Wie Unternehmenserfolg und Entfaltung der Mitarbeiter durch neue Unternehmens- und Führungskulturen gefördert werden können,” in Ringlstetter, M., Kaiser, S., and Müller-Seitz, G. (eds.), Positives Management. Wiesbaden: Gabler: Edition Wissenschaft, pp. 237–65.Google Scholar

Frey, D., Peus, C., and Jonas, E. 2004. “Soziale Organisationen als Centers of Excellence mit Menschenwürde – Zur Professionalisierung der Mitarbeiter- und Unternehmensführung,” in Maelicke, B. (ed.), Personal als Erfolgsfaktor in der Sozialwirtschaft. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 27–52.Google Scholar

George, W. 2003. Authentic Leadership: Rediscovering the Secrets to Creating Lasting Value. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Geyer, A. and Steyrer, J. 1998. “Transformational Leadership and Objective Performance in Banks,” Applied Psychology: An International Review 47: 397–420.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hackman, J. and Oldham, G., 1980. Work Redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Hertzberg, F. 1966. Work and the Nature of Man. Cleveland, OH: World.Google Scholar

Howell, J. M. and Avolio, B. J. 1993. “Transformational Leadership, Transactional Leadership, Locus of Control, and Support for Innovation: Key Predictors of Consolidated Business-unit Performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology 78: 891–902.CrossRef Google Scholar

Janis, I. 1982. Groupthink (second edition). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Locke, E. and Latham, G. 2002. “Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation,” American Psychologist 57 (September): 705–17.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., and Rich, G. A. 2001. “Transformational and Transactional Leadership and Salesperson Performance,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 29(2): 115–34.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pearlin, L. and Kohn, M. 1966. “Social Class, Occupation, and Parental Values: A Cross-National Study,” American Sociological Review 31: 466–79.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Popper, K. 1966. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 1999. All Life is Problem Solving. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Popper, K. 2002. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar

Rogers, C. 1959. “A Theory of Therapy, Personality, and Interpersonal Relations as Developed in the Client-centered Framework,” in S. Koch (ed.), Psychology, a Study of a Science. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Schoenauer, M. and Jessenberger, J. 2005. “Xerox GmbH – From Good to Great,” In D. Kudernatsch and P. Fleschhut (eds.), Management Excellence. Stuttgart: Schaeffer-Poeschel.Google Scholar

Schulz-Hardt, S. and Frey, D. 1997. “Das Sinnprinzip: Ein Standbein des homo psychologicus,” in Mandl, H. (ed.), Bericht über den 40. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie. Goettingen: Hogrefe, pp. 870–6.Google Scholar

Semler, R. 2000. “How We Went Digital without a Strategy,” Harvard Business Review September: 51–8.Google Scholar PubMed

Senge, P. 1994. The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook. New York: Currency Doubleday.Google Scholar

Simons, T. and Robertson, O. 2003. “Why Managers Should Care About Fairness: The Effects of Aggregate Justice Perceptions on Organizational Outcomes,” Journal of Applied Psychology 88: 432–43.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Spector, B. 2003. “HRM at Enron: The Unindicted Co-Conspirator,” Organizational Dynamics 32 (May): 215.CrossRef Google Scholar

Thurow, L. C. 1999. Building Wealth: The New Rules for Individuals, Companies, and Nations in a Knowledge-Based Economy. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Tyler, T. 1994. “Psychological Models of the Justice Motive: Antecedents of Distributive and Procedural Justice,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67: 850–63.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tyler, T. and DeCremer, D. 2005. “Process-based Leadership. Fair Procedures and Reactions to Organizational Change,” Leadership Quarterly 16: 529–54.CrossRef Google Scholar

Useem, M. 2002. “When Your Boss Needs Help: Leading Up and Voicing Concerns,” Personalfuehrung 4: 34–8.Google Scholar

Walumbwa, F., Avolio, B., Gardner, W., Wernsing, T., and Peterson, S. 2008. “Authentic Leadership: Development and Analysis of a Multidimensional Theory-based Measure,” Journal of Management 34 (February): 89–126.CrossRef Google Scholar

West, M. 1997. Developing Creativity in Organizations. Leicester: BPS Books.Google Scholar

Wiedeking, W. 2007. Don't Follow the Crowd. Munich: Piper.Google Scholar