Bibliography

Steven Greer; Janneke Gerards; Rose Slowe

doi:10.1017/9781139179041.012

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 March 2018

Steven Greer ,

Janneke Gerards and

Rose Slowe

Show author details

Steven Greer: Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Janneke Gerards: Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Rose Slowe: Affiliation:
University of Bristol

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Human Rights in the Council of Europe and the European Union
Achievements, Trends and Challenges
, pp. 455 - 490

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139179041.012 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Affholder, S., updated by Lambrecht-Feigl, M., ‘The Congress of Local and Regional Authorities: European co-operation close to the citizen’ in Kleinsorge, T. (ed.), Council of Europe (CoE) (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2nd edn., 2015), pp. 170–82.Google Scholar

Alfredsson, G., ‘A frame an incomplete painting: comparison of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities with international standards and monitoring procedures’, International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 7 (2000), 291–304.Google Scholar

Alston, P., and De Schutter, O. (eds.), Monitoring Fundamental Rights in the EU: The Contribution of the Fundamental Rights Agency (Oxford: Hart, 2005).Google Scholar

Alston, P., with Bustelo, M. R., and Heenan, J. (eds.), The EU and Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Anagnostaras, G., ‘Balancing conflicting fundamental rights: the Sky Österreich paradigm’, European Law Review, 39 (2014), 111–24.Google Scholar

Anagnostou, D., ‘Introduction – untangling the domestic implementation of the European Court of Human Rights’ judgments’ in Anagnostou, D. (ed.), The European Court of Human Rights: Implementing Strasbourg’s Judgments on Domestic Policy (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013), pp. 1–24.Google Scholar

Anagnostou, D., ‘Politics, courts and society in the national implementation and practice of European Court of Human Rights case law’ in Anagnostou, D. (ed.), The European Court of Human Rights: Implementing Strasbourg’s Judgments on Domestic Policy (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013), pp. 211–31.Google Scholar

Andreadakis, S., ‘The European Convention on Human Rights, the EU and the UK: confronting a heresy: a reply to Andrew Williams’, European Journal of International Law, 24 (2013), 1187–93.CrossRef Google Scholar

Anon, ‘Tribute to Rolv Ryssdal, ground-breaking reformer’, Human Rights Information Bulletin No. 50: The European Convention at 50 (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2000).Google Scholar

Arai-Takahashi, Y., The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2002).Google Scholar

Arai-Takahashi, Y., ‘The margin of appreciation doctrine: a theoretical analysis of Strasbourg’s variable geometry’ in Føllesdal, A., Peters, B., and Ulfstin, G. (eds.), Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 62–105.Google Scholar

Arnardóttir, O. M., Equality and Non-Discrimination under the European Convention on Human Rights (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2003).Google Scholar

Arnardóttir, O. M., ‘Discrimination as a magnifying lens: scope and ambit under Article 14 and Protocol No. 12’ in Brems, E., and Gerards, J. (eds.), Shaping Rights in the ECHR; The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights (Cambridge Universtiy Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Ashiagbor, D., ‘Article 15: Freedom to Choose an Occupation’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 423–35.Google Scholar

Ashiagbor, D., ‘Article 29: Right of Access to Placement Services’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford, Hart, 2014), pp. 795–803.Google Scholar

Askola, H., ‘Article 5: Prohibition of Slavery and Forced Labour’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 101–19.Google Scholar

Avbelj, M., and Komárek, J., ‘Four visions of constitutional pluralism’, European Journal of Legal Studies, 2 (2008), 325–70.Google Scholar

Avbelj, M., and Komárek, J., ‘Introduction’ in Avbelj, M., and Komárek, J. (eds.), Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond (Oxford: Hart, 2012), pp. 1–15.Google Scholar

Azoulai, L., ‘The Court of Justice and the social market economy: the emergence of an ideal and the conditions for its realisation’, Common Market Law Review, 45 (2008), 1335–55.Google Scholar

Babayev, R., ‘Private autonomy at Union level: On Article 16 CFREU and free movement rights’, Common Market Law Review, 53 (2016), 979–1005.Google Scholar

Badar, M. E., ‘Basic principles governing limitations on individual rights and freedoms in human rights instruments’, International Journal of Human Rights, 7 (2003), 63–92.Google Scholar

Balducci, G., ‘The study of the EU promotion of human rights: the importance of international and internal factors’, GARNET Working Paper No. 61/08 (2008).Google Scholar

Barents, R., ‘The precedence of EU law from the perspective of constitutional pluralism’, European Constitutional Law Review, 5 (2009), 421–46.Google Scholar

Basu, S., ‘The European Union in the Human Rights Council’ in Wouters, J., Bruyninckx, H., Basu, S., and Schunz, S. (eds.), The European Union and Multilateral Governance (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), 86–102.Google Scholar

Bates, E., The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights: From Its Inception to the Creation of a Permanent Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Bechev, D., and Nicolaïdis, K., ‘From policy to polity: can the EU’s special relations with its ‘neighbourhood’ be decentred?’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(3) (2010), 475–500.Google Scholar

Beijer, M., ‘Active guidance of (procedural) fundamental rights protection by the European Court of Justice’, Review of European Administrative Law, 8 (2015), 127–50.Google Scholar

Beijer, M., The Limits of Fundamental Rights Protection in the EU (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2017).Google Scholar

Bell, J., ‘Reflections on continental European supreme courts’, Legal Studies, 24 (2004), 156–68.Google Scholar

Bell, M., ‘Article 20: equality before the law’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 563–78.Google Scholar

Bell, M., ‘The principle of equal treatment: widening and deepening’ in Craig, P., and de Búrca, G. (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford University Press, 2nd edn., 2011), pp. 611–39.Google Scholar

Bell, M., Schiek, D., and Waddington, L. (eds.), Cases, Materials and Text on National, Supranational and International Non-Discrimination Law (Oxford: Hart, 2007).Google Scholar

Bellamy, R., ‘The democratic legitimacy of international human rights conventions: political constitutionalism and the European Convention on Human Rights’, European Journal of International Law, 25 (2014), 1019–42.Google Scholar

Bellamy, R., ‘The democratic legitimacy of international human rights conventions: political constitutionalism and the Hirst case’ in Føllesdal, A., Schaffer, J., and Ulfstein, G. (eds.), The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Regimes: Legal, Political and Philosophical Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 243–71.Google Scholar

Benelhocine, C., The European Social Charter (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2012).Google Scholar

Bernhardt, R., ‘The admissibility stage: the pros and cons of a certiorari procedure for individual applications’ in Wolfrum, R., and Deutsch, U. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights Overwhelmed by Applications: Problems and Possible Solutions – International Workshop, Heidleberg, 17–18 December 2007 (Berlin: Springer, 2007).Google Scholar

Besselink, L. F. M., ‘National and constitutional identity before and after Lisbon’, Utrecht Law Review, 6 (2010), 36–49.Google Scholar

Besson, S., ‘The human rights competences in the EU – the state of the question after Lisbon’ in Kofler, G. et al. (eds.), Human Rights and Taxation in Europe and the World (IBFD, 2011), pp. 37–63.Google Scholar

Bjorge, E., Domestic Application of the ECHR: Courts as Faithful Trustees (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Björgvinsson, D., ‘The role of the ECtHR in the changing European human rights architecture’ in Mjöll Arnardóttir, O., and Buyse, A. (eds.), Shifting Centres of Gravity in Human Rights Protection: Rethinking relations between the ECHR, EU and national legal orders (London: Routledge, 2016), pp. 26–45.CrossRef Google Scholar

Blankenburg, E., ‘Mobilization of the German Federal Constitutional Court’ in Rogowski and Gawron (eds.), Constitutional Courts, pp. 157–72.Google Scholar

Bobek, M., ‘The Court of Justice, the national courts and the spirit of cooperation: between Dichtung und Wahrheit’ in Lazowski, A., and Blockmans, S. (eds.), Research Handbook on EU Institutional Law (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2016), 353–78.Google Scholar

Bogg, A., ‘Article 31: Fair and Just Working Conditions’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 833–68.Google Scholar

Borreschmidt, N., ‘The EU’s Human Rights Promotion in China and Myanmar: Trading Rights for Might?’, EU Diplomacy Paper 5/2014 (Department of EU International Relations and Diplomacy Studies, 2014).Google Scholar

Bratza, N., ‘Living instrument or dead letter – the future of the European Convention on Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2014), 116–28.Google Scholar

Brems, E., ‘The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights’, Zeitschrift für Auslandisches Offentliches Recht und Volkrecht, 56 (1996), 240–314.Google Scholar

Brkan, M., ‘The unstoppable expansion of the EU Fundamental Right to Data Protection: little shop of horrors?’, Maastricht Journal, 23 (2016), 812–41.Google Scholar

Broberg, M., and Fenger, N., Preliminary References to the European Court of Justice (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Bruer, M., ‘Establishing common standards and securing the rule of law’ in Schmahl, S., and Breuer, M. (eds.), The Council of Europe: Its Law and Policies (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 639–70.Google Scholar

Brummer, K., ‘Enhancing intergovernmentalism: the Council of Europe and human rights’, International Journal of Human Rights, 14(2) (2010), 280–99.Google Scholar

Brummer, K., ‘Imposing sanctions: the not so “normative power Europe”’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 14(2) (2009).Google Scholar

Brunnee, J., and Troope, S., Legitimacy and Legality in International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Bünte, M., and Portela, C., ‘Myanmar: The beginning of reforms and the end of sanctions’, German Institute of Global and Area Studies Focus, 3 (2012), 1–7.Google Scholar

Burri, S., ‘The European Network of Legal Experts in the Field of Gender Equality’, European Anti-Discrimination Law Review, 6 (1993), 11–12.Google Scholar

Çali, B., Koch, A., and Bruch, N., ‘The legitimacy of human rights courts: a grounded interpretivist analysis of the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly, 35 (2013), 955–84.CrossRef Google Scholar

Callewaert, J., ‘The European Convention on Human Rights and European Union Law: a long way to harmony’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2009), 768–83.Google Scholar

Cameron, I., ‘The Court and the member states: procedural aspects’ in Føllesdal, A., Peters, B., and Ulfstein, G. (eds.), Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 25–61.Google Scholar

Carrasco, C. M., ‘The applicability of human rights instruments to European Union’s CSDP operations: framing the challenges’, Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto, 53 (2005), 53–80.Google Scholar

Carrera, S., and Atger, A. F., ‘L’affaire des Roms: A Challenge to the EU’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice’, CEPS Paper ‘Liberty and Security in Europe’ (2010).Google Scholar

Carruba, C., and Gabel, M., ‘Courts, compliance and the quest for legitimacy in international law’, Theoretical Inquiries in International Law, 14 (2013), 505–42.Google Scholar

Checkel, J. T., ‘International institutions and socialization in Europe: introduction and framework’ in Checkel, J. T. (ed.), International Institutions and Socialization in Europe (Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 3–30.Google Scholar

Chetwynd, H., ‘The European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT)’ in Kleinsorge, T. (ed.), Council of Europe (CoE) (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2nd edn., 2015), pp. 127–41.Google Scholar

Choudry, S., ‘Article 9: Right to Marry and Right to Found a Family’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 269–90.Google Scholar

Christoffersen, J., ‘Individual and constitutional justice: can the power balance of adjudication be reversed?’ in Christoffersen, J., and Madsen, M. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 181–203.CrossRef Google Scholar

Churchill, R. R., and Khaliq, U., ‘The collective complaints system of the European Social Charter: an effective mechanism for ensuring compliance with economic and social rights?’, European Journal of International Law, 15 (2004), 417–56.Google Scholar

Claes, M., ‘The EU, its member states and their citizens’ in Leczykiewicz, D., and Weatherill, S. (eds.), The Involvement of EU Law in Private Law Relationships (Oxford: Hart, 2013), pp. 29–52.Google Scholar

Closa, C., ‘Reinforcing EU monitoring of the rule of law: normative arguments, institutional proposals and the procedural limitations’ in Closa, C., and Kochenov, D. (eds.), Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in the European Union (Cambridge University Press, 2016), pp. 15–35Google Scholar

Conant, L., ‘Compelling criteria? Human rights in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy, 21(5), 713–29.Google Scholar

Coppel, J., and O’Neill, A., ‘The European Court of Justice: taking rights seriously?’ Common Market Law Review, 29 (1992), 669–92.Google Scholar

Costa, J.-P., ‘On the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights’ judgments’, European Constitutional Law Review, 7 (2011), 173–82.Google Scholar

Costello, C., ‘Article 33: Family and Professional Life’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 891–925.Google Scholar

Costello, C., ‘The Bosphorus Ruling of the European Court of Human Rights: fundamental rights and blurred boundaries in Europe’, Human Rights Law Review, 6 (2006), 87–130.Google Scholar

Council of Europe, Highlights 2015 (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2016).Google Scholar

Craig, P., ‘Article 41: Right to Good Administration’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1069–98.Google Scholar

Craig, P., ‘The ECJ and ultra vires action: a conceptual analysis’, Common Market Law Review, 48 (2011), 395–437.Google Scholar

Craufurd Smith, R., ‘Article 22: Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Diversity’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 605–31.Google Scholar

Cruft, R., Matthew Liao, S., and Renzo, M., ‘The philosophical foundations of human rights: an overview’ in Cruft, R., Matthew Liao, S., and Renzo, M. (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 1–41.Google Scholar

Cullen, H., ‘The collective complaints system of the European Social Charter: interpretative methods of the European Committee of Social Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, 9 (2009), 61–93.Google Scholar

Curtin, D., and Mendes, J., ‘Article 42: Right of Access to Documents’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1099–119.Google Scholar

Curtin, D., and van Ooik, R., ‘The sting is always in the tail: the personal scope of application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’, Maastricht Journal, 8 (2001), 102–14.Google Scholar

Dahlberg, M., ‘Should social rights be included in interpretations of the convention by the European Court of Human Rights?’ European Journal of Social Security, 16 (2014), 252–76.Google Scholar

Dauses, M. A., ‘The protection of fundamental rights in the community legal order’, European Law Review, 10 (1985), 398–419.Google Scholar

Davies, G., ‘Legislative control of the European Court of Justice’, Common Market Law Review, 51(6) (2014), 1579–607.CrossRef Google Scholar

De Búrca, G., ‘After the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: The Court of Justice as a human rights adjudicator?’ Maastricht Journal, 20 (2013), 168–84.Google Scholar

De Búrca, G., ‘Europe’s Raison d’Etre’, NYU Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 13-09, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2224310.Google Scholar

De Búrca, G., ‘The drafting of the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights’, European Law Review, 26 (2001), 126–38.Google Scholar

De Búrca, G., ‘The ECJ and the international legal order: a re-evaluation’ in de Búrca, G., and Weiler, J. (eds.), The Worlds of European Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 105–49.Google Scholar

De Búrca, G., ‘The evolution of EU human rights law’ in Craig, P., and de Búrca, G., The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford University Press, 2nd edn., 2011), pp. 465–97.Google Scholar

De Londras, F., ‘Dual functionality and the persistent frailty of the European Court of Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2013), 38–46.Google Scholar

De Londras, F., and Dzehtsiarou, K., ‘Managing judicial innovation in the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, 15 (2015), 523–47.Google Scholar

De Mol, M., ‘Kücükdeveci: Mangold revisited – horizontal effect of a general principle of EU law’, European Constitutional Law Review, 6 (2010), 293–308.Google Scholar

De Schoutheete, P., ‘The European Council’ in Peterson, J., and Shackleton, M. (eds.), The Institutions of the European Union (Oxford University Press, 3rd edn., 2012), 43–67.Google Scholar

De Schutter, O., and De Jesus Butler, I., ‘Binding the EU to international human rights law’, Yearbook of European Law, 27 (2008), 277–320.Google Scholar

De Vries, S. A., ‘The protection of fundamental rights within Europe’s internal market after Lisbon – an endeavour for more harmony’ in de Vries, S. et al. (eds.), The Protection of Fundamental Rights in the EU after Lisbon (Oxford: Hart, 2013), pp. 59–94.Google Scholar

De Wet, E., The International Constitutional Order (Amsterdam: Vossiuspers UvA, 2005).Google Scholar

De Witte, B., ‘Article 53 – Level of Protection’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1523–38.Google Scholar

De Witte, B., ‘The legal status of the Charter: vital question or non-issue?’ Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative, 8 (2001), 81–9.Google Scholar

De Witte, B., ‘The past and future role of the European Court of Justice in the protection of human rights’ in Alston, P. et al. (eds.), The EU and Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 859–97.Google Scholar

Den Boer, M., and Monar, J., ‘Keynote article: 11 September and the challenge of global terrorism to the EU as a security actor’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(1), 11–28.Google Scholar

Den Heijer, M., ‘Article 18: Right to Asylum’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 519–41.Google Scholar

Denza, E., ‘Article 46: Diplomatic and Consular Protection’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1177–95.Google Scholar

Devroe, W., and Van Cleynenbreughel, P., ‘The impact of general principles of EU law on private law relationships’ in Hartkamp, A. S. et al. (eds.), The Influence of EU Law on National Private Law (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2014), pp. 187–218.Google Scholar

Diggelmann, O., and Altwicker, T., ‘Is there something like a constitution of international law?’ Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 68 (2008), 623–50.Google Scholar

Dobner, P., and Loughlin, M. (eds.), The Twilight of Constitutionalism (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Dörr, O., ‘Commissioner for Human Rights’ in Schmahl, S., and Breuer, M. (eds.), The Council of Europe: Its Law and Policies (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 296–313.Google Scholar

Dörr, O., ‘European Social Charter’ in Schmahl, S., and Breuer, M. (eds.), The Council of Europe: Its Law and Policies (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 507–41.Google Scholar

Dorssemont, F., ‘Article 12(1): Freedom of Assembly and of Association’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 341–77.Google Scholar

Dorssemont, F., ‘Article 27: Workers’ Right to Information and Consultation within the Undertaking’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 749–71.Google Scholar

Dossow, R., ‘Cultural Co-operation’ in Kleinsorge, T. (ed.), Council of Europe (CoE) (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2nd edn., 2015), pp. 194–201.Google Scholar

Dougan, M., ‘The Treaty of Lisbon 2007: winning minds, not hearts’, Common Market Law Review, 45 (2008), 617–703.Google Scholar

Douglas-Scott, , ‘The European Union and human rights after the Treaty of Lisbon’, Human Rights Law Review, 11 (2011), 645–82.Google Scholar

Drzemczewski, A., ‘Core monitoring mechanisms and related activities’ in Schmahl, S., and Breuer, M. (eds.), The Council of Europe: Its Law and Policies (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 617–35Google Scholar

Drzemczewski, A., ‘Ensuring compatibility of domestic law with the European Convention on Human Rights prior to ratification: the Hungarian model’, Human Rights Law Journal, 16 (1995), 241–60.Google Scholar

Drzemczewski, A., ‘The Council of Europe’s co-operation and assistance programmes with central and eastern Europe in the human rights field: 1990 to September 1993’, Human Rights Law Journal, 14 (1993), 229–48.Google Scholar

Drzemczewski, A., ‘The European Human Rights Convention: a new court of human rights in Strasbourg as of November 1, 1998’, Washington and Lee Law Review, 55 (1998), 697–736.Google Scholar

Dupré, C., ‘Article 1: Human Dignity’ Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 3–24.Google Scholar

Dürr, R., ‘The Venice Commission’ in Kleinsorge, T. (ed.), Council of Europe (CoE) (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2nd edn., 2015), pp. 156–69.Google Scholar

Dzehtsiarou, K., European Consensus and the Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Dzehtsiarou, K., and Greene, A., ‘Restructuring the European Court of Human Rights: preserving the right of individual petition and promoting constitutionalism’, Public Law, (2013), pp. 710–19.Google Scholar

Dzehtsiarou, K., and O’Meara, N., ‘Advisory jurisdiction and the European Court of Human Rights: a magic bullet for dialogue and docket control?’ Legal Studies, 34 (2014), 444–68.Google Scholar

Eckes, C., ‘Does the European Court of Human Rights provide protection from the European Community? – the case of Bosphorus Airways’, European Public Law, 13 (2007), 47–67.Google Scholar

Egeberg, M., and Trondal, J., ‘Differentiated integration in Europe: the case of EEA country, Norway’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(1) (1999), 113–42.Google Scholar

Egli, P., ‘Protocol No. 14 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: towards a more effective control mechanism?’ Journal of Transnational Law and Policy, 17(1) (2007), 1–32.Google Scholar

Eissen, M.-A., ‘The principle of proportionality in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights’ in Macdonald, R. J. et al. (eds.), European System, pp. 125–46.Google Scholar

Ellis, E., and Watson, P., EU Anti-Discrimination Law (Oxford University Press, 2nd edn., 2013).Google Scholar

Eriksen, E. O., The Unfinished Democratization of Europe (Oxford University Press, new edn., 2009).Google Scholar

Eriksen, E. O., ‘Why a Charter of Fundamental Human Rights in the EU?’ Ratio Juris, 16(3) (2003), 352–73.Google Scholar

Evans, M. D., ‘Getting to grips with torture’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 51 (2002), 365–83.Google Scholar

Evans, M. D., Religious Liberty and International Law in Europe (Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Evans, M. D., and Morgan, R., Preventing Torture: A Study of the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman and Degrading Treatment or Punishment (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Everson, M., and Correia Gonçalves, R., ‘Article 16: Freedom to Conduct a Business’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 437–63.Google Scholar

Fabbrini, F., Fundamental Rights in Europe: Challenges and Transformations in Comparative Perspective (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Ferraro, F., and Carmona, J., Fundamental Rights in the European Union: The Role of the Charter after the Lisbon Treaty (European Union: European Parliament Research Service, 2015).Google Scholar

Fierro, E., The EU’s Approach to Human Rights Conditionality in Practice (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 2003).Google Scholar

Fischer, H., Lorion, S., and Ulrich, G., Beyond Activism: The Impact of the Resolutions and Other Activities of the European Parliament in the Field of Human Rights outside the European Union (Venice: Marsilio, 2007).Google Scholar

Føllesdal, A., ‘Much ado about nothing? International judicial review of human rights in well-functioning democracies’ in Føllesdal, A., Schaffer, J., and Ulfstein, G. (eds.), The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Regimes: Legal, Political and Philosophical Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, 2014), pp. 272–99.Google Scholar

Føllesdal, A., ‘The legitimacy of international human rights review: the case of the European Court of Human Rights’, Journal of Social Philosophy, 40 (2009), 595–607.Google Scholar

Føllesdal, A., Peters, B., and Ulfstein, G., ‘Conclusions’ in Føllesdal, A., Peters, B., and Ulfstein, G. (eds.), Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 389–402.Google Scholar

Føllesdal, A., Schaffer, J., and Ulfstein, G. (eds.), The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Regimes: Legal, Political and Philosophical Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Fornasier, M., ‘The impact of EU fundamental rights on private relationships: direct or indirect effect?’ European Review of Public Law, (2015), 29–46.Google Scholar

Fouwels, M., ‘The European Union’s common foreign and security policy and human rights’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 15(3) (1997), 291–324.CrossRef Google Scholar

Franck, T., ‘Why a quest for legitimacy’, UC Davis Law Review, 21 (1987), 535–47.Google Scholar

Fraser, J., ‘Conclusion: The European Convention on Human Rights as a common European endeavour’ in Flogaitis, S., Zwart, Z., and Fraser, J. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights and Its Discontents: Turning Criticism into Strength (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2013), pp. 192–210.Google Scholar

Furtado, C. F., ‘Guess who’s coming to dinner? Protection for national minorities in the eastern and central Europe under the Council of Europe’, Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 34 (2002–3), 333–411.Google Scholar

Fuster, G. G., The Emergence of Personal Data Protection as a Fundamental Right of the EU (Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2014).Google Scholar

Galbreath, D., The Organization for Security and Co-Operation in Europe (Routledge, 2007).Google Scholar

Garben, S., ‘The constitutional (im)balance between “the market” and “the social” in the European Union’, European Constitutional Law Review, 13 (2017), 23–61.Google Scholar

Gearty, C., ‘Democracy and human rights in the European Court of Human Rights: a critical appraisal’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 51 (2000), 381–96.Google Scholar

Gerards, J. H., ‘Inadmissibility decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a critique of the lack of reasoning’, Human Rights Law Review, 14 (2014), 148–58.Google Scholar

Gerards, J. H., ‘Pluralism: Deference and the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine’, European Law Journal, 17 (2011), 80–120.Google Scholar

Gerards, J. H., ‘The discrimination grounds of Article 14 ECHR’, Human Rights Law Review, 13 (2013), 99–124.Google Scholar

Gerards, J. H., ‘The prism of fundamental rights’, European Constitutional Law Review, 8 (2012), 173–202.Google Scholar

Gerards, J. H., ‘Who decides on fundamental rights issues in Europe?’ in Weatherill, S., and de Vries, S. (eds.), Five Years Legally Binding EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (Oxford: Hart, 2015), pp. 47–74.Google Scholar

Gerards, J. H., and Terlouw, A., ‘Solutions for the European Court of Human Rights: the Amicus Curiae project’ in Flogaitis, S., Zwart, Z., and Fraser, J. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights and Its Discontents: Turning Criticism into Strength (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2013), pp. 158–82.Google Scholar

Glas, L., ‘Changes in the procedural practice of the European Court of Human Rights: consequences for the convention system and lessons to be drawn’, Human Rights Law Review, 14 (2014), 671–99.Google Scholar

Glas, L., The Theory, Potential and Practice of Procedural Dialogue in the European Convention on Human Rights System (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2016).Google Scholar

Glendon, M. A., ‘Knowing the Universal Declaration of Human Rights’, Notre Dame Law Review, 73 (1998), 1153–90.Google Scholar

Goldoni, M., ‘Constitutional pluralism and the question of the European common good’, European Law Journal, 18 (2012), 385–406.Google Scholar

Goldston, J., ‘Achievements and challenges: insights from the Strasbourg experience for other international courts’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2009), 603–10.Google Scholar

Gordillo, L., Interlocking Constitutions: Towards and Interordinal Theory of National, European and UN Law (Oxford: Hart, 2012).Google Scholar

Gori, G., ‘Article 14: Right to Education’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 401–22.Google Scholar

Grabenwarter, C., ‘Constitutional standard-setting and strengthening of new democracies’ in Schmahl, S., and Breuer, M. (eds.), The Council of Europe: Its Law and Policies (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 732–46.Google Scholar

Gragl, P., The Accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford: Hart, 2013).Google Scholar

Greer, S., ‘Being ‘realistic’ about human rights?’ Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 60 (2009), 145–61.Google Scholar

Greer, S., ‘Is the prohibition against torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment really “absolute” in international human rights law’, Human Rights Law Review, 15 (2015), 101–37.Google Scholar

Greer, S., ‘Protocol 14 and the Future of the European Court of Human Rights’, Public Law, (2005), 83–106.Google Scholar

Greer, S., ‘Reforming the European Convention on Human Rights: towards Protocol 14’, Public Law, (1993), 663–73.Google Scholar

Greer, S., ‘Should police threats to torture suspects always be severely punished? Reflections on the Gäfgen case’, Human Rights Law Review, 11 (2011), 67–89.Google Scholar

Greer, S., The European Convention on Human Rights: Achievements, Problems and Prospects (Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Greer, S., The Exceptions to Articles 8 to 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, Human Rights Files No. 15, 1997).Google Scholar

Greer, S., The Margin of Appreciation: Interpretation and Discretion under the European Convention on Human Rights (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, Human Rights Files No. 17, 2000).Google Scholar

Greer, S., ‘Universalism and relativism in the protection of human rights in Europe’ in Agha, P. (ed.) Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford: Hart, 2017), pp. 17–36.Google Scholar

Greer, S., and Slowe, R., ‘The Conservatives’ proposals for a British Bill of Rights: mired in muddle, misconception and misrepresentation?’ European Human Rights Law Review, (2015), 370–83.Google Scholar

Greer, S., and Wildhaber, L., ‘Revisiting the debate about “consitutionalising” the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, 12 (2012), 655–87.Google Scholar

Greer, S., and Wildhaber, L., ‘Reflections of a former president of the European Court of Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2010), 165–75.Google Scholar

Greer, S., and Wylde, F., ‘Has the European Court of Human Rights become a “small claims tribunal” and why, if at all, does it matter?’ European Human Rights Law Review, (2017), 146–55.Google Scholar

Gribnau, J., ‘Legitimacy of the judiciary’, Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, 6 (2002), www.ejcl.org/64/art64-3.html.Google Scholar

Grief, N., ‘Non discrimination under the European Convention on Human Rights: a critique of the United Kingdom government’s refusal to sign and ratify Protocol 12’, European Law Review, 27 (2002), 3–18.Google Scholar

Groenendijk, K., ‘Article 40: Right to Vote and Stand as a Candidate at Municipal Elections’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1057–67.Google Scholar

Groussot, X., ‘Constitutional dialogues, pluralism and conflicting identities’ in Avbelj, M., and Komárek, J. (eds.), Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond (Oxford: Hart, 2012), pp. 319–41.Google Scholar

Groussot, X., Arold Lorenz, N. L., and Thor Petursson, G., ‘The paradox of human rights protection in Europe: two courts, one goal?’ in Mjöll Arnardóttir, O., and Buyse, A. (eds.), Shifting Centres of Gravity in Human Rights Protection: Rethinking Relations between the ECHR, EU and National Legal Orders (London: Routledge, 2016), pp. 8–25.Google Scholar

Groussot, X., Lock, T., and Pech, L., ‘EU accession to the European Convention on Human Rights: a legal assessment of the Draft Accession Agreement of 14th October 2011’, European Issues No. 218, 7 November 2011.Google Scholar

Groussot, X., Lock, T., and Petursson, G. T., ‘The reach of EU fundamental rights on member state action after Lisbon’ in de Vries, S. et al. (eds.), The Protection of Fundamental Rights in the EU After Lisbon (Oxford: Hart, 2013), pp. 97–118.Google Scholar

Groussot, X., and Pech, L., ‘Fundamental rights protection in the European Union post Lisbon Treaty’, Policy Papers of the Foundation Robert Schuman (European Issue), 173 (2010).Google Scholar

Guild, E., ‘Article 19: Protection in the Event of Removal’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 543–62.Google Scholar

Guðmundsdóttir, D., ‘A renewed emphasis on the charter’s distinction between rights and principles: is a doctrine of judicial restraint more appropriate?, Common Market Law Review, 52 (2015), 685–720.Google Scholar

Hagemann, S., ‘Strength in numbers? An evaluation of the 2004–2009 European Parliament’, European Policy Centre Issue Paper, 58 (2009).Google Scholar

Halberstam, D., ‘Local, global and plural constitutionalism: Europe meets the world’ in de Búrca, G., and Weiler, J. (eds.), The Worlds of European Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 150–202.Google Scholar

Harby, C., ‘The changing nature of interim measures before the European Court of Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law, (2010), 73–84.Google Scholar

Harden, I., ‘Article 43: European Ombudsman’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1121–50.Google Scholar

Harmsen, R., ‘The European Convention on Human Rights after enlargement’, International Journal of Human Rights, 5 (2001), 18–43.Google Scholar

Harper, J. L., ‘In their own image – The Americans and the question of European unity, 1943–1954’ in Bond, M., Smith, J., and Wallace, W. (eds.), Eminent Europeans (London; The Greycoat Press, 1996), pp. 62–84.Google Scholar

Harris, D., O’Boyle, M., Bates, E., and Buckley, C., Harris, O’Boyle and Warbrick: Law of the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Harris, D., O’Boyle, M., Bates, E., and Buckley, C., Harris, O’Boyle and Warbrick: Law of the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 3rd edn., 2014).Google Scholar

Harris, D, O’Boyle, J., M., and Warbrick, C., Law of the European Convention on Human Rights (London: Butterworths, 1995).Google Scholar

Harris, D., and Darcy, J., The European Social Charter (Ardsley: Transnational, 2nd edn., 2000).Google Scholar

Hartkamp, A. S., ‘The concept of (direct and indirect) horizontal effect of EU law’ in Bernitz, U., Groussot, X., and Schulyok, F. (eds.), General Principles of EU Law and European Private Law (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2013) 189–97.Google Scholar

Heidbreder, E. G., The Impact of Expansion on EU Institutions: The Eastern Touch on Brussels (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).Google Scholar

Helfer, L., ‘Redesigning the European Court of Human Rights: embeddedness as a deep structural principle of the European human rights regime’, European Journal of International Law, 19 (2008), 125–59.Google Scholar

Helfer, L., ‘The burdens and benefits of Brighton’, European Society of International Law Reflections, 1 (2012), http://esil-sedi.eu/node/138.Google Scholar

Helfer, L., and Slaughter, A.-M., ‘Toward a theory of effective supranational adjudication’, Yale Law Journal, 107 (1997), 273–392.Google Scholar

Heliskoski, J., ‘Fundamental rights versus economic freedoms in the European Union: which paradigm?’ in Klabbers, J., and Petman, J. (eds.), Nordic Cosmopolitism: Essays in International Law for Martti Koskenniemi (Martinus Nijhoff, 2003), pp. 417–43.Google Scholar

Hennette-Vauchez, S., ‘Constitutional v international: when unified reformatory rationales mismatch the plural paths of legitimacy of ECHR law’ in Christoffersen, J., and Madsen, M. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 144–63.Google Scholar

Heringa, A. W., and Verhey, L. F. M., ‘The EU Charter: text and structure’, Maastricht Journal, 8 (2001), 11–32.Google Scholar

Hervey, T. K., and Kenner, J., Economic and Social Rights under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Legal Perspective (Oxford: Hart, 2006).Google Scholar

Hervey, T. K., and McHale, J., ‘Article 35: Health Care’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 951–68.Google Scholar

Hill, D. M., ‘Human rights and foreign policy: theoretical foundations’ in Hill, D. M. (ed.), Human Rights and Foreign Policy: Theoretical Foundations (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1989), 3–20.Google Scholar

Hillebrecht, C., Domestic Politics and International Human Rights Tribunals (Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Hillebrecht, C., ‘The power of human rights tribunals: compliance with the European Court of Human Rights and domestic policy change’, European Journal of International Relations, 20 (2014), 1100–23.Google Scholar

Hillion, C., ‘Enlarging the European Union and deepening its fundamental rights protection’, SIEPS European Policy Analysis, 11 (2013), pp. 1–16.Google Scholar

Hioureas, C., ‘Behind the scenes of Protocol No. 14: politics in reforming the European Court of Human Rights’, Berkeley Journal of International Law, 24(2) (2006), 718–57.Google Scholar

Hirsch-Ziembińska, M., ‘In Pursuit of Good Administration’ (European Conference, Strasbourg, 10 January 2008) DA/ba/Conf (2007).Google Scholar

Hoffmeister, F., ‘Cyprus v. Turkey. App.No. 25781/94. At www.echr.coe.int/Eng/Judgments.htm. European Court of Human Rights, Grand Chamber, May 10, 2001’, American Journal of International Law, 96 (2002), 445–52.Google Scholar

Hofman, H. C. H., and Mihaescu, B. C., ‘The relation between the charter’s fundamental rights and the unwritten general principles of EU law: good administration as the test case’, European Constitutional Law Review, 9 (2013), 86–101.Google Scholar

Hogan, G., ‘The right to life and the abortion question under the European Convention on Human Rights’ in Heffernan, L., with Kingston, J. (eds.), Human Rights: A European Perspective (Blackrock: Round Hall Press, 1994), pp. 104–16.Google Scholar

Hovius, B., ‘The limitation clauses of the European Convention on Human Rights: a guide for the application of Section 1 of the charter?’ Ottowa Law Review, 17 (1985), 213–61.Google Scholar

Huber, D., A Decade Which Made History: The Council of Europe 1989–1999 (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 1999).Google Scholar

Hurrell, A., On Global Order: Power, Values and the Constitution of International Society (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Hutchinson, M. R., ‘The margin of appreciation doctrine in the European Court of Human Rights’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 48 (1999), 638–50.Google Scholar

Ionescu, G., The New Politics of European Integration (London: Macmillan, 1972).Google Scholar

Jackson Preece, J., Minority Rights (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Jackson Preece, J., National Minorities and the European Nation-States System (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Jacobs, F. G., ‘Human rights in the European Union: the role of the Court of Justice’, European Law Review, 26 (2001), 331–41.Google Scholar

Jacobs, F. G., ‘The “limitation clauses” of the European Convention on Human Rights’ in de Mestral, A., Birks, S., Bothe, M., Cotler, I., Klinck, D., and Morel, A. (eds.), The Limitation of Human Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law (Cowansville: Les Éditions Yvon Blais Inc., 1986), pp. 21–40.Google Scholar

Jacqué, J. P., ‘The explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1715–24.Google Scholar

Jaklic, K., Constitutional Pluralism in the EU (Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Jones, T. H., ‘The devaluation of human rights under the European Convention’, Public Law, (1995), 430–49.Google Scholar

Jowell, J., ‘The Venice Commission: disseminating democracy through law’, Public Law, (2001), 675–83.Google Scholar

Judt, T., Postwar: A History of Europe since 1945 (London: Pimlico, 2005).Google Scholar

Kamminga, M. T., ‘Is the European Convention on Human Rights sufficiently equipped to cope with gross and systematic violations?’ Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 12 (1994), 153–64.Google Scholar

Keller, H., and Stone Sweet, A. (eds.), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Kenner, J., ‘Article 30: Protection in the Event of Unjustified Dismissal’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 805–32.Google Scholar

Kerr, Lord., ‘The need for dialogue between national courts and the European Court of Human Rights’ in Flogaitis, S., Zwart, T., and Fraser, J. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights and Its Discontents: Turning Criticism into Strength (Edward Elgar, 2013), pp. 104–34.Google Scholar

Khadar, L., and Shaw, J., ‘Article 39: Right to Vote and Stand as a Candidate at Elections to the European Parliament’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1027–56.Google Scholar

Khan-Nisser, S., ‘Conditionality, communication and compliance: the effect of monitoring on collective labour rights in candidate countries’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(6) (2013), 1040–56.Google Scholar

Kilpatrick, C., ‘Article 21: Non-Discrimination’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 579–603.Google Scholar

Kinzelbach, K., ‘The EU’s human rights dialogues - talking to persuade or silencing the debate?’ presented at the Kolleg-Forschergruppe (KFG) Conference: The Transformative Power of Europe at Freie Univesität Berlin, 10–11 December 2009).Google Scholar

Kinzelbach, K., The EU’s Human Rights Dialogue with China: Quiet Diplomacy and Its Limits, vol. VII (Abingdon: Routledge, 2015).Google Scholar

Kitzinger, U. W., The Politics and Economics of European Integration (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1963).Google Scholar

Klabbers, J., Peters, A., and Ulfstein, G., The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Kleinsorge, T., ‘General overview’ in Kleinsorge, T. (ed.), Council of Europe (CoE) (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2nd edn., 2015), pp. 71–4.Google Scholar

Kleinsorge, T., ‘The Parliamentary Assembly: Europe’s motor and conscience’ in Kleinsorge, T. (ed.), Council of Europe (CoE) (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2nd edn., 2015), pp. 75–95.Google Scholar

Kleinsorge, T., ‘The CoE’s activities’ in Kleinsorge, T. (ed.), Council of Europe (CoE) (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2nd edn., 2015), pp. 105–15.Google Scholar

Klerk, Y. S.,’Supervision of the execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights—the Committee of Ministers’ Role under Article 54 of the European Convention on Human Rights’, Netherlands International Law Review, 45 (1998), 65–86.Google Scholar

Kochenov, D., and Pech, L. ‘Monitoring and enforcement of the rule of law in the EU: rhetoric and reality’, European Constitutional Law Review, 11(3) (2015), 512–40.Google Scholar

Kolb, R., ‘The jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights on detention and fair trial in criminal matters from 1992 to the end of 1998’, Human Rights Law Journal, 21 (2000), 348–73.Google Scholar

Kopecky, P., and Ucen, P., ‘Return to Europe? Patterns of Euroscepticism among the Czech and Slovak political parties’ in Rupnik, J., and Zielonka, J. (eds.), The Road to the European Union. vol. I. The Czech and Slovak Republics (Manchester University Press, 2003), 164–79.Google Scholar

Korkeakivi, A., updated by Altenhöner-Dion, C., ‘The CoE and the protection of national minorities’ in Kleinsorge, T. (ed.), Council of Europe (CoE) (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2nd edn., 2015), pp. 183–93.Google Scholar

Kosta, V, Skoutaris, N., and Tzevelekos, V. (eds.), The EU Accession to the ECHR (Oxford: Hart, 2014).Google Scholar

Kranenborg, H., ‘Article 8: Protection of Personal Data’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 223–66.Google Scholar

Kratochvíl, J., ‘The inflation of the margin of appreciation by the European Court of Human Rights’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 29 (2011) 324–57.Google Scholar

Krieger, H., ‘The Conference of International Non-Governmental Organizations of the Council of Europe’ in Schmahl, S., and Breuer, M. (eds.), The Council of Europe: Its Law and Policies (Oxford University Press, 2017), 314–44.Google Scholar

Krisch, N., Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Krisch, N., ‘The case for pluralism in postnational law’ in de Búrca, G., and Weiler, J. (eds.), The Worlds of European Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 203–61.Google Scholar

Krish, N., ‘The open architecture of European human rights law’, Modern Law Review, 71 (2008), 183–216.Google Scholar

Krommendijk, J., ‘Principled silence or mere silence on principles?’ European Constitutional Law Review, 11 (2015), 321–56.Google Scholar

Krommendijk, J., ‘The use of European Court of Human Rights case law by the Court of Justice after Lisbon: the view of Luxembourg insiders’, Maastricht Journal, 22 (2015), 812–35.Google Scholar

Kühling, J., ‘Fundamental rights’ in Von Bogdandy, A., and Bast, J. (eds.), Principles of European Constitutional Law (Oxford: Hart/C. H. Beck, 2nd rev. edn., 2010), pp. 479–514.Google Scholar

Kumm, M., ‘The jurisprudence of constitutional conflict: constitutional supremacy in Europe before and after the constitutional treaty’, European Law Journal, 11 (2005), 262–307.Google Scholar

Ladenburger, C., ‘European Union institutional report’ in Laffranque, J. (ed.), The Protection of Fundamental Rights Post-Lisbon (Tartu University Press, 2012), pp. 141–215.Google Scholar

Lambert-Abdelgawad, E., ‘The Court as a part of the Council of Europe: the Parliamentary Assembly and the Committee of Ministers’ in Føllesdal, A., Peters, B., and Ulfstein, G. (eds.), Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 263–300.Google Scholar

Lambert-Abdelgawad, E., The Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, Human Rights Files No. 19, 2002).Google Scholar

Lambrecht, S., ‘Chapter 19 – Assessing the existence of criticism of the European Court of Human Rights’ in Popelier, P., Lambrecht, S., and Lemmens, K. (eds.), Criticism of the European Court of Human Rights – Shifting the Convention System: Counter-Dynamics at the National and EU Level (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2016), pp. 544–6.Google Scholar

Lamont, R., ‘Article 24: The Rights of the Child’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 661–91.Google Scholar

Landau, E. C., ‘New regime of human rights in the EU’, European Journal of Law Reform, 10 (2008), 557–76.Google Scholar

Lautenbach, G., The Concept of the Rule of Law and the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Lavender, N., ‘The problem of the margin of appreciation’, European Human Rights Law Review, (1997), 380–90.Google Scholar

Leach, P., ‘Access to the European Court of Human Rights – from a legal entitlement to a lottery?’ Human Rights Law Journal, 27 (2006), 11–25.Google Scholar

Leach, P., ‘No longer offering fine mantras to a parched child? The European Court’s developing approach to remedies’ in Føllesdal, A., Peters, B., and Ulfstein, G. (eds.), Constituting Europe: The European Court of Human Rights in a National, European and Global Context (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 142–80.Google Scholar

Leach, P., ‘On the reform of the European Court of Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2009), 725–35.Google Scholar

Leach, P., ‘The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe’ in Schmahl, S., and Breuer, M. (eds.), The Council of Europe: Its Law and Policies (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 181–91.Google Scholar

Leach, P., Hardman, H., and Stephenson, S., ‘Can the European Court’s pilot judgment procedure help resolve systemic human rights violations? Burdov and the failure to implement domestic court decisions in Russia’, Human Rights Law Review, 10(2) (2010), 346–59.Google Scholar

Leach, P., Hardman, H., Stephenson, S., and Blitz, B. K., Responding to Systematic Human Rights Violations – An Analysis of ‘Pilot Judgments’ of the European Court of Human Rights and Their Impact at National Level (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2010).Google Scholar

Leach, P., Paraskeva, C., and Uzelac, G., ‘Human rights fact-finding: the European Court of Human Rights at the crossroads’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 28 (2010), 41–77.Google Scholar

Lebeck, C., ‘The European Court of Human Rights on the relation between ECHR and EC-law: the limits of constitutionalisation of public international law’, Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Rectht, 62 (2007), 195–236.Google Scholar

Leconte, C., ‘The EU fundamental rights policy as a source of Euroscepticism’, Human Rights Review, 15(1) (2014), 83–96.Google Scholar

Leconte, C., and Muir, E., ‘Introduction to special issue “Understanding resistance to the EU fundamental rights policy”’, Human Rights Review, 15(1) (2014), 1–12.Google Scholar

Leczykiewiecz, D., ‘Horizontal effect of fundamental rights: in search of social justice or private autonomy in EU law?’ in Bernitz, U., Groussot, X., and Schulyok, F. (eds.), General Principles of EU Law and European Private Law (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2013), pp. 171–86.Google Scholar

Legg, A., The Margin of Appreciation in International Human Rights Law: Deference and Proportionality (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Leijten, A. E. M., Core Rights and the Protection of Socio-Economic Interests by the European Court of Human Rights (Meijers Research Institute and Graduate School of the Leiden Law School, Faculty of Law, Leiden University, 2015).Google Scholar

Lemmens, K., ‘Chapter 2 – criticising the European Court of Human Rights or misunderstanting the dynamics of human rights protection?’ in Popelier, P., Lambrecht, S., and Lemmens, K. (eds.), Criticism of the European Court of Human Rights – Shifting the Convention System: Counter-Dynamics at the National and EU Level (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2016), pp. 27–8.Google Scholar

Lemmens, P., ‘The relation between the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the European Convention on Human Rights – substantive aspects’, Maastricht Journal, 8 (2001), 49–67.Google Scholar

Lenaerts, K., ‘Exploring the limits of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’, European Constitutional Law Review, 6 (2012), 375–403.Google Scholar

Lenaerts, K., and de Smijter, E., ‘The charter and the role of the European courts’, Maastricht Journal, 8 (2001), 90–101.Google Scholar

Letsas, G., ‘Two concepts of the margin of appreciation’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26 (2006), 705–32.Google Scholar

Lezertua, M., and Forde, A., updated by Sidaropoulos, N., ‘The Commissioner for Human Rights’ in Kleinsorge, T. (ed.), Council of Europe (CoE) (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2nd edn., 2015), pp. 116–23.Google Scholar

Liisberg, J. B., ‘Does the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights threaten the supremacy of community law?’ Common Market Law Review, 38 (2001), 1171–99.Google Scholar

Lindfeldt, M., ‘Article 44: Right to Petition’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1151–60.Google Scholar

Livingstone, S., ‘Article 14 and the prevention of discrimination in the European Convention on Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review, (1997), 25–34.Google Scholar

Lock, T., ‘Beyond Bosphorus: The European Court of Human Rights case law on the responsibility of member states of international organisations under the European Convention on Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, 10 (2010), 529–45.Google Scholar

Lock, T., ‘End of an epic? The draft agreement on the EU’s accession to the ECHR’, Yearbook of European Law, 31 (2012), 162–97.Google Scholar

Lock, T., ‘The future of EU accession to the ECHR after Opinion 2/13: is it still possible and is it still desirable?’ European Constitutional Law Review, 11(2) (2015), 239–73.Google Scholar

Loewenstein, K., Verfassungslehre (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1959).Google Scholar

Loucaides, L. G., ‘The judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Cyprus v. Turkey’, Leiden Journal of International Law, 15 (2002), 225–36.Google Scholar

Lovecy, J., ‘Framing decisions in the Council of Europe: An institutional analysis’ in Reinalda, B., and Verbeek, B. (eds.), Decision Making within International Organizations (London: Routledge, 2004), 59–73.Google Scholar

Lundestad, G., “Empire” by Integration: The United States and European Integration, 1945–1997 (Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

MacMullen, A., ‘Intergovernmental functionalism? The Council of Europe in European integration’, Journal of European Integration, 26 (2004), 405–29.Google Scholar

Madsen, M., ‘From Cold War instrument to supreme European court: the European Court of Human Rights at the crossroads of international and national law and politics’, Law and Social Inquiry, 32 (2007), 137–59.Google Scholar

Maduro, M., ‘Contrapuntal law: Europe’s constitutional pluralism in Action’ in Walker, N. (ed.), Sovereignty in Transition (Oxford: Hart, 2003), 502–37.Google Scholar

Maduro, M., ‘Interpreting European law: judicial adjudication in a context of constitutional pluralism’, European Journal of Legal Studies, 1 (2007) 2, 137–52.Google Scholar

Maduro, M., We the Court (Oxford: Hart, 1998).Google Scholar

Mahoney, P., ‘An Insider’s View of the Reform Debate’, paper presented at the Symposium on the Reform of the European Court of Human Rights, Strasbourg, 17 November 2003.Google Scholar

Mahoney, P., ‘Judicial Activism and Judicial Self-Restraint in the European Court of Human Rights: two sides of the same coin’, Human Rights Law Journal, 11 (1990), 57–88.Google Scholar

Mahoney, P., ‘New Challenges for the European Court of Human Rights Resulting from Expanding Case Load and Membership’, Conference on Human Rights – Dynamic Dimension, London, 27 April 2002.Google Scholar

Mahoney, P., ‘Speculating on the future of the reformed European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Journal, 20 (1999), 1–4.Google Scholar

Mahoney, P., ‘The relationship between the Strasbourg court and the national courts’, Law Quarterly Review, 130 (2014), 568–86.Google Scholar

Mahoney, P., ‘The European Court of Human Rights and its ever-growing caseload: preserving the mission of the Court while ensuring the viability of the individual petition’ in Flogaitis, S., Mahoney, P., et al., ‘The doctrine of the margin of appreciation under the European Convention on Human Rights: its legitimacy in theory and application in practice’ (Council of Europe internal seminar), Human Rights Law Journal, 19 (1998), 1–36.Google Scholar

Mak, C., ‘Unchart(er)ed territory – EU fundamental rights and national private law’ in Hartkamp, A. S. et al. (eds.), The Influence of EU Law on National Private Law (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2014), pp. 323–53.Google Scholar

Malloy, T. E., National Minority Rights in Europe (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Manas, J. E., ‘The Council of Europe’s democracy ideal and the challenge of ethno-national strife’ in Chayes, A., and Chayes, A. H. (eds.), Preventing Conflict in the Post-Communist World – Mobilizing International and Regional Organizations (Washington, DC: Brookings Occasional Papers, Brookings Institution, 1996), pp. 99–144.Google Scholar

Manners, I. A., ‘The normative ethics of the European Union’, International Affairs, 84(1) (2008), 45–60.Google Scholar

Marks, S., ‘The European Convention on Human Rights and its “democratic society”’, British Yearbook of International Law, 66 (1995), 209–38.Google Scholar

Marston, G., ‘The United Kingdom’s part in the preparation of the European Convention on Human Rights 1950’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 42 (1993), 796–826.Google Scholar

Martínez-Torrón, J., ‘The European Court of Human Rights and religion’, Current Legal Issues, (2001), 185–204.Google Scholar

Martinico, G., and Pollicino, O., The Interaction between Europe’s Legal Systems: Judicial Dialogue and the Creation of Supranational Laws (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2012).Google Scholar

McBride, J., ‘Proportionality and the European Convention on Human Rights’ in Ellis, E. (ed.), The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe (Oxford: Hart, 1999), pp. 23–35.Google Scholar

McCormick, J., Understanding the European Union: A Concise Introduction (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 6th edn., 2014).Google Scholar

McCrea, R., ‘Article 10: Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 291–309.Google Scholar

McHarg, A., ‘Reconciling human rights and the public interest: conceptual problems and doctrinal uncertainty in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, Modern Law Review, 62 (1999), 671–96.Google Scholar

Mendes, J., ‘Good Administration in EU Law and the European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour’, EU Working Papers 2009/09 (European University Institute, Florence, Department of Law).Google Scholar

Meron, T., and Sloan, J. S., ‘Democracy, rule of law and admission to the Council of Europe’, Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, 26 (1997).Google Scholar

Miara, L., and Prais, V., ‘The role of civil society in the execution of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2012), 528–53.Google Scholar

Michalowski, S., ‘Article 3: Right to the Integrity of the Person’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 39–60.Google Scholar

Mitsilegas, V., ‘Article 49: Principles of Legality and Proportionality’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1351–71.Google Scholar

Moravcsik, A., ‘The origins of human rights regimes: democratic delegation in postwar Europe’, International Organisation, 54 (2000), 217–52.Google Scholar

Moreham, N., ‘The right to respect for private life in the European Convention on Human Rights: a re-examination’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2008), 44–79.Google Scholar

Morgan, K., Labour in Power (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Morgan, R., and Evans, M., Combating Torture in Europe: The Work and Standards of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2001).Google Scholar

Morgera, E., and Marín Durán, G., ‘Environmental protection’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 983–1003.Google Scholar

Møse, E., ‘New rights for the new Court?’ in Mahoney, P., Matscher, F., Petzold, H., and Wildhaber, L. (eds.), Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective – Studies in Memory of Rolv Ryssdal (Cologne: Carl Heymans, 2000), pp. 943–56.Google Scholar

Mowbray, A., ‘An examination of the work of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights’, Public Law, (2007) 507–28.Google Scholar

Mowbray, A., ‘Proposals for reform of the European Court of Human Rights’, Public Law, (2002), 252–64.Google Scholar

Mowbray, A., The Development of Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights by the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford: Hart, 2004).Google Scholar

Mowbray, A., ‘The Interlaken Declaration – The beginning of a new era for the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, 10 (2010), 519–28.Google Scholar

Mowbray, A., ‘The role of the European Court of Human Rights in the promotion of democracy’, Public Law, (1999), 703–25.Google Scholar

Muir, E., ‘The fundamental rights implications of EU legislation: some constitutional challenges’, Common Market Law Review, 51(1) (2014), 219–45.Google Scholar

Muir, E., ‘The transformative function of EU equality law’, European Review of Public Law, (2013), 1231–54.Google Scholar

Müller, J.-W., ‘Safeguarding Democracy Inside the EU: Brussels and the Future of Liberal Order’, Transatlantic Academy 2012–2013 Paper Studies No. 3 (2013).Google Scholar

Murdoch, J., ‘Tackling ill-treatment in places of detention: the work of the Council of Europe’s “Torture Committee”’, European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 12 (2006), 121–42.Google Scholar

Murdoch, J., ‘The impact of Europe’s “Torture Committee” and the evolution of standard-setting in relation to places of detention’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2006), 159–79.Google Scholar

Naert, F., ‘Accountability for violations of human rights law by EU forces’ in Blockmans, S. (ed.), The European Union and Crisis Management: Policy and Legal Aspects (The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press, 2008), 375–93.Google Scholar

Napoli, D., ‘The European Union’s foreign policy and human rights’ in Neuwahl, N. A., and Rosas, A. (eds.), The European Union and Human Rights (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1995), 297–312.Google Scholar

Nehl, H. P., ‘Article 48: Presumption of Innocence and Right of Defence (Administrative Law)’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1277–301.Google Scholar

Nicol, D., ‘Original intent and the European Convention on Human Rights’, Public Law, (2005), 152–72.Google Scholar

Nolan, A., ‘“Aggravated violations”, Roma housing rights and forced expulsions in Italy: recent developments under the European Social Charter Collective Complaints System’, European Human Rights Law Review, 11 (2011), 343–6.Google Scholar

Novitz, T., ‘Are social rights necessarily collective rights? A critical analysis of the collective complaints protocol to the European Social Charter’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2002), 50–66.Google Scholar

Novitz, T., ‘Remedies for violation of social rights within the Council of Europe: the significant absence of a court’ in Kilpatrick, C., Novitz, T., and Skidmore, P. (eds.), The Future of Remedies in Europe (Oxford: Hart, 2000), pp. 231–51.Google Scholar

Nowak, M., ‘The agency and national institutions for the promotion and protection of human rights’ in Alston, P., and de Schutter, O. (eds.), Monitoring Fundamental Rights in the EU: The Contribution of the Fundamental Rights Agency (Oxford: Hart, 2005), 91–130.Google Scholar

Nowak, M., and Charbord, A., ‘Article 4: Prohibition of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 61–99.Google Scholar

Nowak, T., ‘Of garbage cans and rulings: judgments of the European Court of Justice in the EU legislative process’, West European Politics, 33(4) (2010), 753–69.Google Scholar

Nugent, N., The Government and Politics of the European Union (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 7th edn., 2010).Google Scholar

Oeter, S., ‘Conventions on the Protection of National Minorities’ in Schmahl, S., and Breuer, M. (eds.), The Council of Europe: Its Law and Policies (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 542–71.Google Scholar

O’Brien, C., ‘Article 26: Integration of Persons with Disabilities’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 709–48.Google Scholar

O’Cinneide, C., ‘Article 25: The Rights of the Elderly’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 693–708.Google Scholar

Odermatt, J., ‘A giant step backwards? Opinion 2/13 on the EU’s accession to the European Convention on Human Rights’, New York University Journal of Law and Politics, 47 (2015), 783–98.Google Scholar

Ojanen, T., ‘Making the essence of fundamental rights real: the Court of Justice of the European Union clarifies the structure of fundamental rights under the charter’, European Constitutional Law Review, 12 (2016), 318–29.Google Scholar

Olsen, C., updated by Kleinsorge, T., ‘Treaty-making in the CoE’ in Kleinsorge, T. (ed.), Council of Europe (CoE) (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2nd edn., 2015), pp. 143–55.Google Scholar

Oomen, B., ‘A serious case of Strasbourg-bashing? An evaluation of the debates on the legitimacy of human rights in the Netherlands’, International Journal of Human Rights, 20 (2016), 407–25.Google Scholar

Ost, F., ‘The original canons of interpretation of the European Court of Human Rights’ in Delmas-Marty, M., and Chodkiewicz, C. (eds.), The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights: International Protection Versus National Restrictions (Dortrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1992), pp. 238–318.Google Scholar

Palmer, S., ‘The Committee of Ministers’ in Schmahl, S., and Breuer, M. (eds.), The Council of Europe: Its Law and Policies (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 137–65.Google Scholar

Palmer, S., updated by Poirel, C., ‘Committee of Ministers’ in Kleinsorge, T. (ed.), Council of Europe (CoE) (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2nd edn., 2015), pp. 96–104.Google Scholar

Parry, R., ‘History, human rights and multilingual citizenship: conceptualising the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 61 (2010), 329–48.Google Scholar

Paulus, A., ‘From implementation to translation: applying the European Court of Human Rights Judgments in the domestic legal orders’ in Seibert-Fohr, A., and Villiger, M. (eds.), Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights – Effects and Implementation (Baden-Baden: Nomos/Ashgate, 2013), pp. 267–83.Google Scholar

Pedain, A., ‘The human rights dimension of the Diane Pretty case’, Cambridge Law Journal, 62 (2003), 181–206.Google Scholar

Peers, S., and Prechal, S., ‘Article 52 – Scope and Interpretation of Rights and Principles’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1455–521.Google Scholar

Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights (Oxford: Hart, 2004).Google Scholar

Pentassuglia, G., ‘Monitoring minority rights in Europe: the implementation machinery of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities – with special reference to the role of the advisory committee’, International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 6 (1991), 417–61.Google Scholar

Pescatore, P., ‘Fundamental rights and the system of the European communities’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 18 (1970), 343–51.Google Scholar

Petaux, J., Democracy and Human Rights for Europe: The Council of Europe’s Contribution (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publications, 2009).Google Scholar

Peterson, J., and Shackleton, M., The Institutions of the European Union (Oxford University Press, 3rd edn., 2012).Google Scholar

Petzold, H., “The convention and the principle of subsidiarity” in Macdonald, R. St. J., Matscher, F., and Petzold, H. (eds.), The European System for the Protection of Human Rights (Dortrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1993), pp. 41–62.Google Scholar

Phillips, A., ‘The 10th anniversary of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities’, Euopäiasches Journal für Minderheitenfragen, 3 (2008), 181–9.Google Scholar

Polakiewicz, J., ‘The European Union and the Council of Europe – Competition or Coherence in Fundamental Rights Protection in Europe?’ Jean Monnet Conference, 27–28 May 2008.Google Scholar

Popelier, P., Van de Heyning, C., and Van Nuffel, P. (eds.), Human Rights Protection in the European Legal Order: The Between the European and the National Courts (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2011).Google Scholar

Popovic, D., ‘Prevailing of judicial activism over self-restraint in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights’, Creighton Law Review, 42 (2009), 361–96.Google Scholar

Portela, C., and Orbie, J., ‘Sanctions under the EU generalised system of preferences and foreign policy: coherence by accident?’ Contemporary Politics, 20(1) (2014), 63–76.Google Scholar

Portela, C., and Vennesson, P., ‘Sanctions and embargos in EU-Asia relations’ in Christiansen, T., Kirchner, E., and Murray, P. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of EU-Asia Relations (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan, 2013), 198–210.Google Scholar

Prebensen, S. C., ‘Inter-state complaints under treaty provisions – the experience under the European Convention on Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Journal, 20 (1999), 446–55.Google Scholar

Prebensen, S. C., ‘Evolutive interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights’ in Mahoney, P., Matscher, F., Petzold, H., and Wildhaber, L. (eds.), Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective – Studies in Memory of Rolv Ryssdal (Cologne: Carl Heymans, 2000), pp. 1123–37.Google Scholar

Prechal, S., ‘Competence creep and general principles of law’, Review of European Administrative Law, 3 (2010), 5–22.Google Scholar

Prechal, S., de Vries, S., and van Eijken, H., ‘The principle of attributed powers and the “scope of EU law”’ in Besselink, L., et al. (eds.), The Eclipse of the Legality Principle in the European Union (Kluwer Law International, 2010), pp. 213–47.Google Scholar

Prodi, R., ‘A wider Europe: a proximity policy as the key to stability’, speech to the Sixth ECSA World Conference in Brussels, 5–6 December 2002 (SPEECH/02/619).Google Scholar

Provost, R., ‘Teetering on the edge of legal nihilism: Russia and the evolving European human rights regime’, Human Rights Quarterly, 37 (2015), 289–40.Google Scholar

Rainey, B., Wicks, E., and Ovey, C., Jacobs, White and Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 6th edn., 2014).Google Scholar

Reidy, A., Hampson, F., and Boyle, K., ‘Gross violations of human rights: invoking the European Convention on Human Rights in the case of Turkey’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 15 (1997), 161–73.Google Scholar

Reneman, M., EU Asylum Procedures and the Right to an Effective Remedy (Oxford: Hart, 2014).Google Scholar

Ringelheim, J., ‘Minority rights in a time of multiculturlism – the evolving scope of the Framework Convention on the Protection of National Minorities’, Human Rights Law Review, 10(1) (2010), 99–128.Google Scholar

Robertson, A. H., The Council of Europe: Its Structure, Functions and Achievements (London: Stevens & Sons, 2nd edn., 1961).Google Scholar

Roos, C., and Orsini, G., ‘How to Reconcile the EU Border Paradox? The Concurrence of Refugee Reception and Deterrence’, Institute for European Studies Policy Brief 4/2015 (Brussels: Vrije Universitei, 2015).Google Scholar

Royer, A., The Council of Europe (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2010).Google Scholar

Ruffert, M., ‘Secretariat’ in Schmahl, S., and Breuer, M. (eds.), The Council of Europe: Its Law and Policies (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 212–23.Google Scholar

Ryngaert, C., ‘Oscillating between embracing and avoiding Bosphorus: the European Court of Human Rights on member state responsibility for acts of international organisations and the case of the EU’, European Law Review, 39 (2014), 176–92.Google Scholar

Ryssdal, R., ‘On the Road to a European Constitutional Court’, Winston Churchill Lecture on the Council of Europe, Florence, 21 June 1991, quoted in Alkema, E. A., ‘The European Convention as a constitution and its Court as a constitutional court’ in Mahoney, P., Matscher, F., Petzold, H., and Wildhaber, L. (eds.), Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective – Studies in Memory of Rolv Ryssdall (Cologne: Carl Heymans, 2000), pp. 41–63.Google Scholar

Ryssdall, R., ‘Opinion: the coming of age of the European Convention on Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review, (1996), 18–29.Google Scholar

Sadurski, W., ‘Partnering with Strasbourg: constitutionalization of the European Court of Human Rights, the accession of central and east european states to the Council of Europe, and the idea of pilot judgments’, Human Rights Law Review, 9 (2009), 397–453.Google Scholar

Sadurski, W., Rights before Courts: A Study of Constitutional Courts in Postcommunist States of Central and Eastern Europe (Dordrecht: Springer, 2005).Google Scholar

Safjan, M., and Miklasziewicz, P., ‘Horizontal effect of the general principles of EU law in the sphere of private law’, European Review of Public Law, (2010), 475–86.Google Scholar

Sainati, T., ‘Human rights class actions: rethinking the pilot-judgment procedure at the European Court of Human Rights’, Harvard International Law Journal, 56 (2015), 147–206.Google Scholar

Sardaro, P., ‘Jus non dicere for allegations of serious violations of human rights: questionable trends in the recent case law of the Strasbourg Court’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2003), 601–30.Google Scholar

Sargentini, J., and Dimitrovs, A., ‘The European Parliament’s role: towards new Copenhagen criteria for existing member states?’ Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(5), 1085–92.Google Scholar

Sarmiento, D., ‘The silent lamb and the deaf wolves’ in Avbelj, M., and Komárek, J. (eds.), Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond (Oxford University Press, 2012) 285–318, pp. 285–317.Google Scholar

Sarmiento, D., ‘Who’s Afraid of the charter? The Court of Justice, national courts and the New Framework of Fundamental Rights Protection in Europe’, Common Market Law Review, 50 (2013), 1267–304.Google Scholar

Sayers, D., ‘Article 13: Freedom of the Arts and Sciences’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 379–400.Google Scholar

Sayers, D., ‘Article 48: Presumption of Innocence and Right of Defence (Criminal Law)’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1303–49.Google Scholar

Schabas, W., The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Scheuner, U., ‘Fundamental rights in European Community law and in national constitutional law’, Common Market Law Review, 12 (1975), 171–91.Google Scholar

Schiek, D., ‘Article 23: Equality between Women and Men’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 633–60.Google Scholar

Schiek, D., ‘Intersectionality and the notion of disability in EU discrimination law’, Common Market Law Review, 53 (2016), 35–64.Google Scholar

Schill, S., ‘Overcoming absolute primacy: respect for national identity under the Lisbon Treaty’, Common Market Law Review, 48 (2011), 1417–54.Google Scholar

Schimmelfennig, F., Engbert, S., and Knobel, H., International Socialization in Europe: European Organizations, Political Conditionality, and Democratic Change (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006).Google Scholar

Schmahl, S., ‘The Council of Europe within the system of international organizations’ in Schmahl, S., and Breuer, M. (eds.), The Council of Europe: Its Law and Policies (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 874–945.Google Scholar

Schokkenbroek, J., ‘The prohibition of discrimination in Article 14 of the Convention and the margin of appreciation’, Human Rights Law Journal, 19 (1998), 20–3.Google Scholar

Schwellnus, G., ‘Social rights: The EU and ILO’ in Falkner, G., and Müller, P. (eds.) EU Policies in a Global Perspective: Shaping or Taking International Regimes? (London: Routledge, 2014).Google Scholar

Scott-Moncrieff, L., ‘Editorial – Language and the law: reclaiming the human rights debate’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2013), 115–21.Google Scholar

Sedelmeier, U., ‘Anchoring democracy from above? The European Union and democratic backsliding in Hungary and Romania after accession’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1) (2014), 105–21.Google Scholar

Seibert-Fohr, A., and Villiger, M., ‘Current challenges in European multilevel human rights protection’ in Seibert-Fohr, A., and Villiger, M. (eds.), Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights – Effects and Implementation (Baden-Baden: Nomos/Ashgate, 2013), pp. 13–24.Google Scholar

Senden, H. C. K., Interpretation of Fundamental Rights in a Multilevel Legal System (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2011).Google Scholar

Senden, L. A. J., ‘Soft law and its implications for institutional balance in the EC’, Utrecht Law Review, 1(2) (2005), 79–99.Google Scholar

Shany, Y., ‘Assessing the effectiveness of international courts – a goal-based approach’, American Journal of International Law, 106 (2012), 225–70.Google Scholar

Shaw, J., and Khadar, L., ‘Article 12(2): Freedom of Assembly and Association’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 371–7.Google Scholar

Sicilianos, L. I., ‘The involvement of the European Court of Human Rights in the implementation of its judgments: recent developments under Article 46 ECHR’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 32 (2014), 235–62.Google Scholar

Sieburgh, C., ‘A method to substantively guide the involvement of EU primary law in private law matters’, European Review of Public Law, (2013), 1165–88.Google Scholar

Sieburgh, C., ‘General principles and the charter in private law relationships’ in Bernitz, U., Groussot, X., and Schulyok, F. (eds.), General Principles of EU Law and European Private Law (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2013), pp. 233–47.Google Scholar

Siegel, A., ‘Beyond Measuring – the Council of Europe’s Instruments Contributing to the Progress of Societies’, OECD World Forum on Measuring and Fostering Progress of Societies, Istanbul, 23–30 June 2007.Google Scholar

Sikkink, K., ‘The power of principled ideas: human rights policies in the United States and Western Europe’ in Goldstein, J., and Keohane, R. O. (eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change (New York: Cornell University Press, 1993), pp. 139–70.Google Scholar

Simor, J., and Emmerson, B. (eds.), Human Rights Practice (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2000).Google Scholar

Simpson, A. W. B., ‘Britain and the European Convention’, Cornell International Law Journal, 34 (2001), 523–54.Google Scholar

Simpson, A. W. B., Human Rights and the End of Empire – Britain and the Genesis of the European Convention (Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Simpson, A. W. B., ‘Hersch Lauterpacht and the genesis of the age of human rights’, Law Quarterly Review, 120 (2004), 49–80.Google Scholar

Sjursen, H., ‘Enlargement in perspective. The EU’s quest for identity’, Recon Online Working Paper 2007/15.Google Scholar

Smith, K. E., ‘The conditional offer of membership as an instrument of EU foreign policy: reshaping Europe in the EU’s image?’ Marmara Journal of European Studies, 33 (2000), 1301–59.Google Scholar

Smith, K. E., ‘The EU as a diplomatic actor in the field of human rights’ in Koops, J., and Macaj, G. (eds.), The European Union as a Diplomatic Actor (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015), 155–77.Google Scholar

Smith, K. E., ‘The European Union at the Human Rights Council: speaking with one voice but having little influence’, Journal of European Public Policy, 17(2) (2010), 224–41.Google Scholar

Smith, K. E., ‘The use of political conditionality in the EU’s relations with third countries: how effective?’ SPS Working Paper 1997/7 (San Domenico di Fiesole: EUI, 1997), 1–37.Google Scholar

Smith, K. E., European Union Foreign Policy in a Changing World (London: Polity Press, 3rd edn., 2014).Google Scholar

Smith, M., ‘Developing administrative principles in the EU: a foundational model of legitimacy?’, European Law Journal, 18(2) (2012), 269–88.Google Scholar

Snell, J., ‘Fundamental rights review of national measures: nothing new under the charter?’ European Public Law, 21 (2015), 285–308.Google Scholar

Söderman, J., ‘Public Hearing before the Convention on the Draft Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’, speech delivered on 2 February 2000 in Brussels.Google Scholar

Spano, R., ‘Universality or diversity of human rights? Strasbourg in the age of subsidiarity’, Human Rights Law Review, 14 (2014), 487–502.Google Scholar

Spaventa, E., ‘Article 45: Freedom of Movement and of Residence’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1161–76.Google Scholar

Stalford, H., ‘Article 32: Prohibition of Child Labour and Protection of Young People at Work’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 869–89.Google Scholar

Steyn, Lord., ‘Laying the foundations of human rights law in the United Kingdom’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2005), 349–62.Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, A., ‘The European Convention on Human Rights and national constitutional reordering’, Cardozo Law Review, 33 (2012), 1859–68.Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, A., ‘The European Court of Justice’ in Craig, P., and de Búrca, G. (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford University Press, 2nd edn., 2011), pp. 121–53.Google Scholar

Stubberfield, C., ‘Lifting the Organisational Veil: Positive Obligations of the European Union following accession to the European Convention on Human Rights’, Australian International Legal Journal, 19 (2012), 117–42.Google Scholar

Suchkova, M., ‘An analysis of the institutional arrangements within the Council of Europe and within certain member states for securing the enforcement of judgments’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2011), 448–63.Google Scholar

Sweeney, J. A., ‘Margins of appreciation: cultural relativity and the European Court of Human Rights in the post–Cold War era’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 54 (2005), 459–74.Google Scholar

Sweeney, J. A., The European Court of Human Rights in the Post-Cold War Era: Universality in Transition (London: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar

Swimelar, S., ‘Approaches to Ethnic Conflict and the Protection of Human Rights in Post-Communist Europe: The Need for Preventive Diplomacy’, Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 7 (2001), 98–126.Google Scholar

Szyszczak, E., ‘Article 36: Access to Services’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 969–82.Google Scholar

Tamm, D., ‘The history of the Court of Justice of the European Union since its origin’ in The Court of Justice of the European Union (ed.), The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-law - La Cour de Justice et la Construction de l’Europe: Analyses et Perspectives de Soixante Ans de Jurisprudence (The Hague: TMC Asser Press, 2013), 9–35.Google Scholar

Thielborger, P., ‘Judicial Passivism at the European Court of Human Rights’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 19 (2012), 341–47.Google Scholar

Thorarensen, B., ‘The advisory jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights under Protocol No. 16: enhancing domestic implementation or human rights or a symbolic step’ in Mjöll Arnardóttir, O., and Buyse, A. (eds.), Shifting Centres of Gravity in Human Rights Protection: Rethinking Relations between the ECHR, EU and National Legal Orders (London and New York: Routledge, 2016), pp. 79–100.Google Scholar

Tocci, N., The EU and Conflict Resolution: Promoting Peace in the Backyard (London: Routledge, 2007).Google Scholar

Toggenburg, G., ‘The EU Charter: moving from a fundamental rights ornament to a European fundamental rights order’ in Palmisano, G. (ed.), Making the Charter of Fundamental Rights a Living Instrument (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2015), 10–29.Google Scholar

Toggenburg, G., ‘The role of the new EU Fundamental Rights Agency: debating the “sex of angels” or improving Europe’s human rights performance?’ European Law Review, 3(385) (2008), 385–98.Google Scholar

Tomkin, J., ‘Article 50: Right Not to Be Tried or Punished Twice in Criminal Proceedings for the Same Criminal Offence’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1373–412.Google Scholar

Tomkins, A., ‘The Committee of Ministers: its roles under the European Convention on Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review, 49 (1995), 49–62.Google Scholar

Torremans, P., ‘Article 17(2): Right to Property’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 489–517.Google Scholar

Torres Pérez, A., Conflicts of Rights in the European Union: A Theory of Supranational Adjudication (Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Torres Pérez, A., ‘Melloni in three acts: from dialogue to monologue’, European Constitutional Law Review, 10 (2014), 308–31.Google Scholar

Trauner, F., ‘Asylum policy: the EU ‘crises’ and the looming policy regime failure’, Journal of European Integration, 38 (2016), 311–25.Google Scholar

Trechsel, S., ‘Human rights and minority rights – two sides of the same coin? A sketch’ in Mahoney, P., Matscher, F., Petzold, H., and Wildhaber, L. (eds.), Protecting Human Rights: The European Perspective – Studies in Memory of Rolv Ryssdal (Cologne: Carl Heymans, 2000), pp. 1443–53.Google Scholar

Trommer, S., and Chari, R., ‘The Council of Europe: interest groups and ideological mission?’ West European Politics, 29 (2006), 665–86.Google Scholar

Tsagourias, N. (ed.), Transnational Constitutionalism: International and European Models (Cambridge University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Tzevelekos, V., ‘When elephants fight it is the grass that suffers: “hegemonic struggle” in Europe and the side-effects for international law’ in Dzehtsiarou, K., Konstadinides, T., Lock, T., and O’Meara, N. (eds.), Human Rights in Europe: The Influence, Overlaps and Contradictions of the EU and the ECHR (London and New York: Routledge, 2014), pp. 9–34.Google Scholar

Ulfstein, G., ‘The European Court of Human Rights and national courts: a constitutional relationship?’ in Mjöll Arnardóttir, O., and Buyse, A. (eds.), Shifting Centres of Gravity in Human Rights Protection: Rethinking Relations between the ECHR, EU and National Legal Orders (London and New York: Routledge, 2016), pp. 46–58.Google Scholar

Vachudová, M. A., Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage and Integration after Communism (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Van Bockel, B., The Ne Bis in Idem Principle in EU Law (Alphen ann de Rijn Kluwer Law International, 2010).Google Scholar

Van Cleynenbreugel, P., ‘Judge-made standards of national procedure in the post-Lisbon constitutional framework’, European Law Review, 37 (2012), 90–100.Google Scholar

Van de Heyning, C., Fundamental Rights lost in complexity, unpublished PhD thesis, Antwerp University, 2011.Google Scholar

Van de Heyning, C., ‘No place like home: discretionary space for the domestic protection of fundamental rights’ in Popelier, P., van de Heyning, C., and van Nuffel, P. (eds.), Human Rights Protection in the European Legal Order: The Interaction between the European and the National Courts (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2011), pp. 65–96.Google Scholar

Van de Heyning, C., and Lawson, R., ‘The EU as a party to the European Convention of (sic) Human Rights: EU law and the European Court of Justice case law as inspiration and challenge to the European Court of Human Rights jurisprudence’ in Popelier, P., Van de Heyning, C., and Van Nuffel, P. (eds.), Human Rights Protection in the European Legal Order: The Interaction between the European and the National Courts (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2011), pp. 35–64.Google Scholar

Van den Berghe, F., ‘The EU and issues of human rights protection: same solutions to more acute problems?’ European Law Journal, 16 (2010), 112–57.Google Scholar

Vested-Hansen, J., ‘Article 7: Respect for Private and Family Life (Private Life, Home and Communications)’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 153–82.Google Scholar

Voeten, E., ‘Domestic implementation of European Court of Human Rights judgments: legal infrastructure and government effectiveness matter: a reply to Dia Anagnostou and Alina Mungiu-Pippidi’, European Journal of International Law, 25 (2014), 229–38.Google Scholar

Voeten, E., ‘Public Opinion and the Legitimacy of International Courts’, Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 14 (2013), 411–36.Google Scholar

Voeten, E., ‘Politics, judicial behaviour and institutional design’ in Christoffersen, J., and Madsen, M. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 61–76Google Scholar

Vogiatzis, N., ‘The admissibility criterion under Article 35(3)(b) ECHR: a “significant disadvantage” to human rights protection’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 65 (2016), 185–211.Google Scholar

Von Bogdandy, A., ‘The European Union as a human rights organization? Human rights and the core of the European Union’, Common Market Law Review, 37(6) (2000), 1307–38.Google Scholar

Von Bogdandy, A., and Schill, S., ‘Overcoming absolute primacy: respect for national identity under the Lisbon Treaty’, Common Market Law Review, 48 (2011), 1417–54.Google Scholar

Von Bogdandy, A., et al., ‘Reverse Solange – protecting the essence of fundamental rights against EU member states’, Common Market Law Review, 49 (2012), 489–520.Google Scholar

Von Danwitz, T., and Paraschas, K., ‘A fresh start for the charter: fundamental questions on the application of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights’, Fordham International Law Review, 35 (2012), 1396–424.Google Scholar

Vorhaus, J., ‘On degradation. part one. Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights’, Common Law World Review, 31 (2002), 374–99.Google Scholar

Vorhaus, J., ‘On degradation. part two. Degrading Treatment and Punishment’, Common Law World Review, 32 (2003), 65–92.Google Scholar

Walker, N., ‘Reconciling MacCormick: constitutional pluralism and the unity of practical reason’ Ratio Juris, 24 (2011), 369–85.Google Scholar

Walker, N., ‘The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism’, Modern Law Review, 65 (2002), 317–59.Google Scholar

Wallace, S., ‘Much ado about nothing? The pilot judgment procedure at the European Court of Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2011), 71–81.Google Scholar

Walter, C., ‘Combating terrorism and organized crime’ in Schmahl, S., and Breuer, M. (eds.), The Council of Europe: Its Law and Policies (Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 671–95.Google Scholar

Ward, A., ‘Article 51: Field of Application’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1413–54.Google Scholar

Ward, A., et al., ‘Article 47: Right to an Effective Remedy and to a Fair Trial’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1198–275.Google Scholar

Weatherill, S., ‘Article 38: Consumer Protection’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 1005–25.Google Scholar

Weatherill, S., ‘From economic rights to fundamental rights’ in de Vries, S. et al. (eds.), The Protection of Fundamental Rights in the EU after Lisbon (Oxford: Hart, 2013), pp. 11–36.Google Scholar

Weiler, J., ‘In defence of the status quo: Europe’s constitutional Sonderweg’ in Weiler, J., and Wind, M. (eds.), European Constitutionalism beyond the State (Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 7–23.Google Scholar

Weiler, J., ‘Prologue: global and pluralist constitutionalism: some doubts’ in de Búrca, G., and Weiler, J. (eds.), The Worlds of European Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 8–18.Google Scholar

Weller, M. (ed.), The Rights of Minorities: A Commentary on the European Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Weller, M., Vertichel, A., Alen, A., De Witte, B., and Lemmens, P. (eds.), The Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities: A Useful Pan-European Instrument? (Antwerp: Intersentia, 2008).Google Scholar

White, R., ‘Article 34: Social Security and Social Assistance’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 927–49.Google Scholar

White, R., and Boussiakou, I., ‘Voices from the European Court of Human Rights’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 27(2) (2009), 167–89.Google Scholar

White, R., and Ovey, C., Jacobs, White and Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 6th edn., 2014).Google Scholar

Whitehead, L., The International Dimensions of Democratization: Europe and the Americas (Oxford University Press, 2nd edn. 2001).Google Scholar

Wicks, E., ‘Article 2: Right to Life’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 25–38.Google Scholar

Wicks, E., ‘The United Kingdom government’s perceptions of the European Convention on Human Rights at the time of entry’, Public Law, (2000), 438–55.Google Scholar

Wildhaber, L., ‘A constitutional future for the European Court of Human Rights?’ Human Rights Law Journal, 23 (2002), 161–5.Google Scholar

Wildhaber, L., ‘The European Convention on Human Rights and International Law’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 56 (2007), 217–32.Google Scholar

Wildhaber, L., ‘Rethinking the European Court of Human Rights’ in Christoffersen, J., and Madsen, M. (eds.) The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 2014–29.Google Scholar

Wildhaber, L., ‘The role of the European Court of Human Rights: an evaluation’, Mediterranean Journal of Human Rights, 8 (2004), 9–32.Google Scholar

Williams, A., EU Human Rights Policies: A Study in Irony (Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Williams, A., The Ethos of Europe: Values, Law and Justice in the EU (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Williams, A., ‘The European Convention on Human Rights, the EU and the UK: confronting a heresy’, European Journal of International Law, 24 (2013), 1157–85.Google Scholar

Wilsher, D., ‘Article 6: Right to Liberty and Security’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 121–52.Google Scholar

Wincott, D., ‘The Court of Justice and the European policy process’ in Richardson, J. (ed.), European Union, Power and Policy-Making (London: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar

Winkler, G., The Council of Europe: Monitoring Procedures and the Constitutional Autonomy of Member States (Vienna: Springer, 2006).Google Scholar

Wintemute, R., ‘Filling the Article 14 “gap”: government ratification and judicial control of Protocol No. 12 ECHR: part 2’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2004), 484–99.Google Scholar

Wintemute, R., ‘“Within the ambit”: how big is the “gap” in Article 14 European Convention on Human Rights? part 1’, European Human Rights Law Review, (2004), 366–82.Google Scholar

Wissink, M., ‘Interpretation of private law in conformity with EU directives’ in Hartkamp, A. S. et al. (eds.), The Influence of EU Law on National Private Law (Deventer: Kluwer, 2014), pp. 119–58.Google Scholar

Wolfrum, R., and Deutsch, U. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights Overwhelmed by Applications: Problems and Possible Solutions – International Workshop, Heidleberg, 17–18 December 2007 (Berlin: Springer, 2007).Google Scholar

Wollenschläger, F., ‘Article 17(1): Right to Property’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 469–87.Google Scholar

Woods, L., ‘Article 11: Freedom of Expression and Information, in Peers, S., Hervey, T., Kenner, J., and Ward, A. (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Oxford: Hart, 2014), pp. 311–39.Google Scholar

Wouters, J., and Hermez, M., ‘EU Guidelines on Human Rights as a Foreign Policy Instrument: An Assessment’, Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies Working Paper No. 170 (Leuven: Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies, 2016).Google Scholar

Wright, B., ‘The Europeanisation of Hungary: institutional adjustment and the effects of European Union integration’, POLIS Journal, (2013), 271–331.Google Scholar

Youngs, R. (ed.), Survey of European Democracy Promotion Policies 2000–2006 (Madrid: Fundacíon para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Diálogo Exterior (FRIDE), 2006).Google Scholar

Yourow, H. C., The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Dynamics of European Human Rights Jurisprudence (The Hague: Kluwer, 1996).Google Scholar

Zaru, D., and Guerts, C.-M., ‘Legal framework for EU participation in global human rights governance’ in Wouters, J., Bruyninckx, H., Basu, S., and Schunz, S. (eds.), The European Union and Multilateral Governance: Assessing EU Participation in United Nations Human Rights and Environmental Fora (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), 49–65.Google Scholar

Zoethout, C. M., ‘Margin of appreciation, violation and (in)compatibility: why the European Court of Human Rights might consider using an alternative mode of adjudication’, European Public Law, 20 (2014), 309–30.Google Scholar

Zwart, T., ‘More human rights than Court: why the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights is in need of repair and how it can be done’ in Flogaitis, S., Zwart, Z., and Fraser, J. (eds.), The European Court of Human Rights and Its Discontents: Turning Criticism into Strength (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2013), pp. 71–95.Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive