Ecology of the Hudson River Zooplankton Community

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511550539.018

16 - Ecology of the Hudson River Zooplankton Community

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 January 2010

Michael L. Pace and

Darcy J. Lonsdale

Edited by

Jeffrey S. Levinton and

John R. Waldman

Show author details

Michael L. Pace: Affiliation:
Institute of Ecosystem Studies
Darcy J. Lonsdale: Affiliation:
Marine Sciences Research Center, Stony Brook University
Jeffrey S. Levinton: Affiliation:
State University of New York, Stony Brook

Book contents

Get access

Summary

abstract Zooplankton in the Hudson River estuary include both freshwater and estuarine species and range in body lengths from microns to millimeters. Measurements of abundance and biomass as well as community rate processes indicate that zooplankton do not generally exert significant grazing pressure on phytoplankton. In addition, recycling of nutrients by zooplankton is not significant to primary producers because concentrations of dissolved nutrients are quite high in the Hudson and controlled by other processes. Zooplankton do provide an important linkage in the food web as they are key prey items for many young-of-year fish as well as fish that are primarily planktivorous throughout life. Long-term observations indicate many zooplankton populations undergo regular seasonal cycles in abundance, typically with increases during warm, low-flow periods of the year. The invasion of the zebra mussel into the Hudson had strong impacts on zooplankton in the freshwater section of the estuary. Microzooplankton such as rotifers declined dramatically. Cladocerans also declined in annual average abundance between pre- and post-zebra mussel periods when the effects of wet and dry years are taken into account. Zebra mussels, however, had little effect on larger zooplankton. Regulation of zooplankton appears to be a function of physical forces that affect population residence times as well as food and predators. Evidence for food limitation is mixed. Some species benefit from food supplements in experimental trials, but the reduction of phytoplankton biomass in association with the zebra mussel invasion had no effect on cladoceran egg production. There are a variety of potential predators, and calculations indicate fish exert high rates of mortality on zooplankton.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Hudson River Estuary , pp. 217 - 229

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550539.018 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adrian, R., Hansson, S., Sandin, B., Stasio, B., and Larsson, U. 1999. Effects of food availability and predation on a marine zooplankton community – A study on copepods in the Baltic Sea. Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie 84:609–26Google Scholar

Caraco, N. F., Cole, J. J., Findlay, S. E. G., Fischer, D. T., Lampman, G. G., Pace, M. L., and Strayer, D. L. 2000. Dissolved oxygen declines in the Hudson River associated with the invasion of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha). Environmental Science and Technology 34:1204–1210CrossRef Google Scholar

Caraco, N. F., Cole, J. J., Raymond, P. A., Strayer, D. L., Pace, M. L., Findlay, S. E. G., and Fischer, D. T. 1997. Zebra mussel invasion in a large, turbid, river: phytoplankton response to increased grazing. Ecology 78:588–602CrossRef Google Scholar

Chervin, M. B. 1978. Assimilation of particulate organic carbon by estuarine and coastal copepods. Marine Biology 49:265–75CrossRef Google Scholar

Chervin, M. B., Malone, T. C., and Neale, P. J. 1981. Interactions between suspended organic matter and copepod grazing in the plume of the Hudson River. Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science 13:169–83CrossRef Google Scholar

Christy, J. H., and Morgan, S. G. 1998. Estuarine immigration by crab postlarvae: mechanisms, reliability and adaptive significance. Marine Ecology Progress Series 174:51–65CrossRef Google Scholar

Clark, J. F., Simpson, H. J., Bopp, R. F., and Deck, B. 1992. Geochemistry and loading history of phosphate and silicate in the Hudson Estuary. Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science 34:213–233CrossRef Google Scholar

Cole, J. J., Caraco, N. F., and Peierls, B. L. 1992. Can phytoplankton maintain a positive carbon balance in a turbid, fresh-water, tidal estuary?Limnology and Oceanography 37:1608–1617CrossRef Google Scholar

Cyr, H., Downing, J. A., Lalonde, S., Baines, S., and Pace, M. L. 1992. Sampling larval fish populations: choice of sample number and size. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 121:356–682.3.CO;2>CrossRef Google Scholar

Day, J. W. Jr., Hall, C. A. S., Kemp, W. M., and Yáñez-Arancibia, A. 1989. Estuarine EcologyNew York: John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar

Deason, E. E., and Smayda, T. J. 1982. Ctenophore-zooplankton-phytoplankton interactions in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, USA, during 1972–1977. Journal of Plankton Research 4: 203–217CrossRef Google Scholar

DeMott, W. R., and Gulati, R. D. 1999. Phosphorous limitation in Daphnia: Evidence from a long-term study of three hypereutrophic Dutch lakes. Limnology and Oceanography 44:1557–64CrossRef Google Scholar

Durbin, E. G., Durbin, A. G., Smayda, T. J., and Verity, P. G. 1983. Food limitation of production by adult Acartia tonsa in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island. Limnology and Oceanography 28:1199–1213CrossRef Google Scholar

Feigenbaum, D., and Kelly, M. 1984. Changes in the lower Chesapeake Bay food chain in the presence of the sea nettle Chrysaora quinquecirrha (Schyphomedusa). Marine Ecology Progress Series 19: 39–47CrossRef Google Scholar

Findlay, S., Pace, M. L., Lints, D., Cole, J. J., Caraco, N. F., and Peierls, B. 1991. Weak coupling of bacterial and algal production in a heterotrophic ecosystem: The Hudson River estuary. Limnology and Oceanography 36:268–78CrossRef Google Scholar

Gasol, J. M., and Vaqué, D. 1993. Lack of coupling between heterotrophic nanoflagellates and bacteria: A general phenomenon across aquatic systems. Limnology and Oceanography 38:657–65CrossRef Google Scholar

Grabe, S. A. 1978. Food and feeding habits of juvenile Atlantic tomcod, Microgadus tomcod, from Haverstraw bay, Hudson River. Fisheries Bulletin 76:89–94Google Scholar

Grabe, S. A. 1996. Feeding chronology and habits of Alosa spp., (Clupeidae) juveniles from the lower Hudson River estuary, New York. Environmental Biology of Fishes 47:321–6CrossRef Google Scholar

Harvey, H. R., Ederington, M. C., and McManus, G. B. 1997. Lipid composition of the marine ciliates Pleuronema sp. and Fabrea salina: Shifts in response to changes in diet. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 44:189–93CrossRef Google Scholar

Huntley, M. E., and Lopez, M. D. G. 1992. Temperature-dependent production of marine copepods: A global synthesis. American Naturalist 140:201–42CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hurst, T. P., and Conover, D. O. 2001. Diet and consumption rates of overwintering YOY striped bass, Morone saxatilis, in the Hudson River. Fisheries Bulletin 99:545–53Google Scholar

Jonasdottir, S. H. 1994. Effects of food quality on the reproductive success of Acartia tonsa and Acartia hudsonica: laboratory observations. Marine Biology 121:67–81CrossRef Google Scholar

Kerfoot, W. C. 1980. Ecology and Evolution of Zooplankton Communities Special Symposium Volume 3, American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, University Press of New England, Durham, New HampshireGoogle Scholar

Kiørboe, T. 1998. Population regulation and role of mesozooplankton in shaping marine pelagic food webs. Hydrobiologia 363:13–27CrossRef Google Scholar

Kleppel, G. S. 1992. Environmental regulation of feeding and egg production by Acartia tonsa off southern California. Marine Biology 112:57–65CrossRef Google Scholar

Kremer, P. 1994. Patterns of abundance for Mnemiopsis in U.S. coastal water: a comparative review. ICES Journal of Marine Science 51:347–54CrossRef Google Scholar

Kunze, H. B. 1995. “Distribution and transport of larvae within the Hudson River estuary.” M.S. Thesis, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York

Lampman, G. G., Caraco, N. F., and Cole, J. J. 1999. Spatial and temporal patterns of nutrient concentration and export in the tidal Hudson River. Estuaries 22:285–96CrossRef Google Scholar

Limburg, K. E. 1994. “Ecological constraints on growth and migration of juvenile American shad (Alosa sapidissima Wilson) in the Hudson River estuary, New York.” Ph. D. Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York

Limburg, K. E., Pace, M. L., Arend, K. K. 1999. Growth, mortality, and recruitment of larval Morone spp. in relation to food availability and temperature in the Hudson River. Fisheries Bulletin 97:80–91Google Scholar

Limburg, K. E., Pace, M. L., Fischer, D., and Arend, K. K. 1997. Consumption, selectivity, and use of zooplankton by larval striped bass and white perch in a seasonally pulsed estuary. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 126:607–212.3.CO;2>CrossRef Google Scholar

Lints, D., Findlay, S. E. G., and Pace, M. L. 1992. Biomass and energetics of consumers in the lower food web of the Hudson River, in Smith, C. L. (ed.), Estuarine Research in the 1980s. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 466–57Google Scholar

Lonsdale, D. J., Cosper, E. M., and Doall, M. 1996. Effects of zooplankton grazing on phytoplankton size-structure and biomass in the lower Hudson River estuary. Estuaries 19:874–89CrossRef Google Scholar

MacIsaac, H. J., Sprules, W. G., Johansson, O. E., and Leach, J. J. 1992. Filtering impacts of larval and sessile zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha) in western Lake Erie. Oecologia 92:30–9CrossRef Google Scholar

Mauchline, J. 1998. The biology of calanoid copepods, in Blaxter, J. H. S., Southward, A. J., and Tyler, P. A. (eds.), Advances in Marine Biology, Vol. 33. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 1–710Google Scholar

Mehner, T., and Thiel, R. 1999. A review of predation impact by 0+ fish on zooplankton in fresh and brackish waters of the temperate northern hemisphere. Environmental Biology of Fishes 56:169–81CrossRef Google Scholar

Merrell, J. R., and Stoecker, D. K. 1998. Differential grazing on protozoan microplankton by developmental stages of the calanoid copepod Eurytemora affinis Poppe. Journal of Plankton Research 20:289–304CrossRef Google Scholar

Omori, M., and Ikeda, T. 1984. Methods in Marine Zooplankton Ecology, New York: John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar

Pace, M. L., Findlay, S. E. G., and Fischer, D. 1998. Effects of an invasive bivalve on the zooplankton community of the Hudson River. Freshwater Biology 38:103–116CrossRef Google Scholar

Pace, M. L., Findlay, S. E. G., and Lints, D. 1991. Variance in zooplankton samples: evaluation of a predictive model. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 48:146–51CrossRef Google Scholar

Pace, M. L., Findlay, S. E. G., and Lints, D. 1992. Zooplankton in advective environments: The Hudson River community and a comparative analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. 49:1060–9CrossRef Google Scholar

Sanders, R. W., and Wickham, S. A. 1993. Planktonic protozoa and metazoa: predation, food quality and population control. Marine Microbial Food Webs 7:197–223Google Scholar

Sherr, E. B., and Sherr, B. F. 1987. High rates of consumption of bacteria by pelagic ciliates. Nature 325:710–711CrossRef Google Scholar

Simenstad, C. A., Small, L. F., and McIntire, C. D. 1990. Consumption processes and food web structure in the Columbia River estuary. Progress in Oceanography 25:271–97CrossRef Google Scholar

Stepien, J. C., Malone, T. C., and Chervin, M. B. 1981. Copepod communities in the estuary and coastal plume of the Hudson River. Estuarine and Coastal Shelf Science 13:185–95CrossRef Google Scholar

Stoecker, D. K., and Capuzzo, J. M. 1990. Predation on protozoa: its importance to zooplankton. Journal of Plankton Research 12:891–908CrossRef Google Scholar

Stoecker, D. K., and Govoni, J. J. 1984. Food selection by young larval gulf menhaden (Brevoortia patronus). Marine Biology 80:299–306CrossRef Google Scholar

Stoecker, D. K., Verity, P. G., Michaels, A. E., and Davis, L. H. 1987. Feeding by larval and postlarval ctenophores on microzooplankton. Journal of Plankton Research 9:667–83CrossRef Google Scholar

Strayer, D. L., Caraco, N. F., Cole, J. J., Findlay, S., and Pace, M. L. 1999. Transformation of freshwater ecosystems by bivalves: a case study in the Hudson River. BioScience 49:19–27CrossRef Google Scholar

Strayer, D. L., and Smith, L. C. 2001. The zoobenthos of the freshwater tidal Hudson River and its response to the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) invasion. Archive für Hydrobiologia Supplement 139:1–52Google Scholar

Strayer, D. L., Hattala, K., and Kahnle, A. 2004. Effects of an invasive bivalve (Dreissena polymorpha) on fish in the Hudson River estuary. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61:924–41CrossRef Google Scholar

Vaqué, D., Pace, M. L., Findlay, S. E. G., and Lints, D. 1992. Fate of bacterial production in a heterotrophic ecosystem: Grazing by protists and metazoans in the Hudson Estuary. Marine Ecology Progress Series 89:155–63CrossRef Google Scholar

Wong, W. H., Levinton, J. S., Twining, B. S., and Fisher, N. 2003. Assimilation of micro- and mesozooplankton by zebra mussels: A demonstration of the food web link between benthic predators and zooplankton. Limnology and Oceanography 48:308–312CrossRef Google Scholar

Book contents

16 - Ecology of the Hudson River Zooplankton Community

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive