Popular mobilizations: Jews and lunatics

Ann Goldberg

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511730160.006

5 - Popular mobilizations: Jews and lunatics

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 May 2010

Ann Goldberg

Show author details

Ann Goldberg: Affiliation:
University of California, Riverside

Book contents

Get access

Summary

In the early twentieth century, in the tiny town of Reppen near Frankfurt/Oder, a Jewish merchant from Berlin, Spiegel, was standing in a courtroom before a local magistrate when the latter, pointing at Spiegel, turned to his clerk and asked with disdain, “So what does this Jew want?” Mortified, Spiegel did what any self-respecting German would have done: he sued, rushing home to employ the services of the famous Berlin defense attorney Fritz Friedmann. Spiegel got his insult trial, but in a place like Reppen it had the feel of a rigged Jim Crow courtroom. The antisemitic community was outraged at the affrontery of the suit, and Spiegel, probably sensing trouble, skipped the trial altogether, sending his lawyer in his stead. Entering the courtroom on the day of the trial, Friedmann had a portent of things to come when he found the defendant (the town's judge) socializing in a backroom with the judge-juror panel presiding over the case. The mood in the courtroom and in the town was so menacing that, after the case was dismissed, Friedmann, himself a Jew and fearing for his life, fled in the first train back to Berlin.

Spiegel's reaction to an insult made sense given the honor culture in which he lived. But the basis of his lawsuit was something new and, in a place like Reppen, controversial: antisemitism. Filing such a suit presupposed an inherent Jewish claim to dignity and the right to defend it in law.

Type: Chapter
Information: Honor, Politics, and the Law in Imperial Germany, 1871–1914 , pp. 157 - 192

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511730160.006 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Fritz, Friedmann, Was ich erlebte vol. 1 (Berlin, 1908), pp. 164 ff.Google Scholar

Sabine, Ullmann, Nachbarschaft und Konkurrenz (Göttingen, 1999), pp. 451–58.Google Scholar

Aschaffenburg, G., Das Verbrechen und seine Bekämpfung (Heidelberg, 1903), p. 42Google Scholar

Ute, Frevert, Men of Honor: A Social and Cultural History of the Duel (Cambridge, MA, 1995), pp. 113ffGoogle Scholar

Barnet, Hartston, Sensationalizing the Jewish Question: Anti-Semitic Trials and the Press in the Early German Empire (Leiden, 2005), pp. 87ff.Google Scholar

Deborah, Hertz, “Dueling for Emancipation: Jewish Masculinity in the Era of Napoleon,” in Marion, Kaplan et al. (eds.), Jüdische Welten (Göttingen, 2005), pp. 69–85Google Scholar

Kathy, Stuart, Defiled Trades and Social Outcasts: Honor and Ritual Pollution in Early Modern Germany (Cambridge, 1999Google Scholar

Herzl, , Das neue Ghetto (Vienna and Berlin, 1920), p. 26.Google Scholar

Arnold, Paucker, “Der jüdische Abwehrkampf,” in Werner, Mosse (ed.), Entscheidungsjahr 1932: Zur Judenfrage in der Endphase der Weimarer Republik (Tübingen, 1966), pp. 405–99Google Scholar

Sanford, Ragins, Jewish Responses to Anti-Semitism in Germany, 1870–1914 (Cincinnati, 1980Google Scholar

Marjorie, Lamberti, Jewish Activism in Imperial Germany (New Haven, 1978)Google Scholar

Richard, Levy, The Downfall of the Anti-Semitic Political Parties in Imperial Germany (New Haven, 1975)Google Scholar

Douglas, G. Morris, Justice Imperiled: The Anti-Nazi Lawyer Max Hirschberg in Weimar Germany (Ann Arbor, 2005).Google Scholar

Alfred, Michaelis (ed.), Die Rechtsverhältnisse der Juden in Preussen (Berlin, 1910), p. 548–49.

Rechtssprechung des deutschen Reichsgerichts in Strafsachen 3 (Munich and Leipzig, 1881), p. 606

Bernhard, Beyer, Die Bestrebungen zur Reform des Irrenwesens (Halle, 1912)Google Scholar

Kretzschmar, Fr., Die Irrenfrage am Ausgange des 19. Jahrhunderts (Großenhain, 1896), p. 253.Google Scholar

Heinz-Peter, Schmiedebach, “Eine ‘anti-psychiatrische Bewegung’ um die Jahrhundertwende,” in Martin, Dinges (ed.), Medizinkritische Bewegungen im Deutschen Reich (Stuttgart, 1996), pp. 127–59Google Scholar

Karen, Nolte, “Querulantenwahnsinn – ‘Eiginsinn’ oder ‘Irrsinn’?” in idem et al. (eds), Moderne Anstaltspsychiatrie im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert – Legitimation und Kritik (Stuttgart, 2006), pp. 395–410Google Scholar

Rebecca, Schwoch and Heinz-Peter, Schmiedebach, “‘Querulantenwahnsinn,’ Pschiatrikritik und Öffentlichkeit um 1900,” Medizin Historisches Journal 42 (2007), 30–60Google Scholar

Thomas, Rechlin, Antipsychiatrie, ihre Wurzeln und Voraussetzungen (Bochum, 1987)Google Scholar

Norman, Dain, “Psychiatry and Anti-Psychiatry in the U.S.,” in Mark, Micale and Roy, Porter (eds.), Discovering the History of Psychiatry (New York, 1994), pp. 415–44Google Scholar

Gerald, Grob, From Asylum to Community (Princeton, 1991).Google Scholar

Andreas, Daum, Wissenschaftspopularisierung im 19. Jahrhundert (Munich, 1998)Google Scholar

Paul, Weindling, Health, Race and German Politics (Cambridge, 1989), pp. 3ff.Google Scholar

Joachim, Radkau, Das Zeitalter der Nervosität (Munich, 2000)Google Scholar

Ann, Goldberg, “Conventions of Madness: Bürgerlichkeit and the Asylum in the Vormärz,” Central European History 33 (2000), 173–93.Google Scholar

Ludwig, Ernst, Für die Lebendig Begraben, 2nd edn (Vienna, 1904), pp. 30–31, 41.Google Scholar

Zustände in der Heidelberger Universitäts-Irren-Klinik. Oder 5 Tage lebendig begraben (Heidelberg, 1908)

Michel, Foucault, Discipline and Punish, trans. Alan, Sheridan (New York, 1977).Google Scholar

Rudolf, Arndt, Geisteskrank. Unzurechnungsfähig. Entmündigt (Greifswald, 1896), p. 12Google Scholar

Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch vom 18. August 1896 (Munich, 1902), p. 453.

Ernst, Müller, Drei Monate ohne Grund im Irrenhause (Dresden, 1898), p. 5.Google Scholar

Doris, Kaufmann, Aufklärung, bürgerliche Selbsterfahrung und die ‘Erfindung’ der Psychiatrie in Deutschland, 1770–1850 (Göttingen, 1995)Google Scholar

Ewald, Krüner, Moderne Folterkammern, 5th edn (Hagen and Zurich, 1913)Google Scholar

Klos, P., Deutsche Beamtenherrschaft in ihrer ganzen Machtentfaltung (Zurich, 1909)Google Scholar

Carl, Brill, Pflichtwidrigkeiten hiesiger Richter in einem Ehescheidungensprozeß (Magdeburg, 1906)Google Scholar

Anton, Maleszka, Wie man Geisteskranke fabriziert (Berlin, 1905)Google Scholar

Georg, Platner, Modernes Standrecht (Zurich, 1896).Google Scholar

Hans, Schmidt, “Das Haus des Schreckens” oder Dichtung und Wahrheit (Leipzig, 1890)Google Scholar

Franz, Schäfer, Ein “Schwabenstreich” der Züricher Polizei oder 4 Tage “auf Beobachtung” in der Züricher Irrenanstalt Burghöli (Belfast, 1897)Google Scholar

Margarita, Stocker, Judith. Sexual Warrior (New Haven, 1998).Google Scholar

Morris, Jonge, Ein Akt moderner Tortur (Berlin, 1890).Google Scholar

Ahrens, Ad., Anti-Vernunft. Beweisstücke für die jetzigen ungenügenden Irrengesetze (Hamburg, 1891).Google Scholar

Eine Mutter im Irrenhause. Beitrag zur Sittengeschichte unserer Zeit (Bremen, 1851), p. 142

Der Prozeß der Familie Gabe in Hamburg (Bremen, 1851).

Zustände in der Staats-Irrenanstalt Winnenthal (Stuttgart, 1895), p. 5.

Kretzschmar, , Die Unvollkommenheit der heutigen Psychiatrie und die Mangelhaftigkeit der deutschen Irrengesetzgebung (Leipzig, 1891), p. 5.Google Scholar

Offene Briefe an Seine Majestät den König von Preußen (Charlottenburg, 1896)

Carl, Paasch, Offener Brief an Reichskanzler von Caprivi (Leipzig, 1891).Google Scholar

“Hallucinationen” und Gegenbeweise. Ein Rechtsfall (Salzburg, 1897)

Margaret, Anderson, Practicing Democracy: Elections and Political Culture in Imperial Germany (Princeton, 2000Google Scholar

Carl, Witte, Mein Conflict mit Herrn Hof- und Domprediger Stöcker (Berlin, 1889)Google Scholar

Walter, Frank, Hofprediger Adolf Stoecker und die christlichsoziale Bewegung (Hamburg, 1935)Google Scholar

Liepmann, , “Die Beleidigung,” in Mittermaier, et al. (eds.), Vergleichende Darstellung des deutschen und ausländischen Strafrechts: Besonderer Teil vol. 4 (Berlin, 1906), p. 69Google Scholar

Heinrich, Schüle, Klinische Psychiatrie (Leipzig, 1886), quoted in Beyer, Bestrebungen, pp. 359–63.Google Scholar

Künstlicher Irrsinn. Eine Warnung vor Irrenanstalten (Leipzig, 1894), p. 24

Kevin, Repp, Reformers Critics, and the Paths of German Modernity (Cambridge, MA, 2000)Google Scholar

Geoff, Eley, Reshaping the German Right (Ann Arbor, MI, 1991).Google Scholar

“Zur Entwicklung völkischen Rechtsdenkens. Frühe rechtsradikale Programmatik und bürgerliche Rechtswissenschaft,” in Hans, Jochen Vogel et al. (eds.), Die Freiheit des Anderen: Festschrift für Martin Hirsch (Baden-Baden, 1981), pp. 87–88.

Kretzschmar, , Die Unvollkommenheit der heutigen Psychiatrie und die Mangelhaftigkeit der deutschen Irrengesetzgebung [Leipzig, 1891], p. 59).Google Scholar