Book contents
- The Historicity of International Politics
- The Historicity of International Politics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I The Imperial Past and Present in International Politics and IR
- Part II Historical Sociology and the Imperial Fundaments of International Politics
- Part III Global History and the Imperial Fundaments of International Politics
- 11 Unearthing the Coloniality in the International through the Genealogy of IR in Japan and Beyond
- 12 Was the Rise of the ‘Third World’ a Theory Effect?
- 13 The Past and Its Presence in Ottoman and Post-Ottoman Memory Cultures
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
11 - Unearthing the Coloniality in the International through the Genealogy of IR in Japan and Beyond
from Part III - Global History and the Imperial Fundaments of International Politics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 June 2023
By
Book contents
- The Historicity of International Politics
- The Historicity of International Politics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I The Imperial Past and Present in International Politics and IR
- Part II Historical Sociology and the Imperial Fundaments of International Politics
- Part III Global History and the Imperial Fundaments of International Politics
- 11 Unearthing the Coloniality in the International through the Genealogy of IR in Japan and Beyond
- 12 Was the Rise of the ‘Third World’ a Theory Effect?
- 13 The Past and Its Presence in Ottoman and Post-Ottoman Memory Cultures
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter identifies the notion of the International as the core concept of the inter- (nation) state system, which had so far defined the disciplinary knowledge of IR. It argues that Euro-centricity of the disciplinary knowledge of IR is closely connected to this inter-state-centred notion, which had become ‘a-colonial’ and ‘apolitical’, and that an historical unearthing of its neglected colonial legacies is crucial for globalizing this knowledge. The chapter, therefore, pays an attention to neglected imperial polities, and suggests two ways for retrieving them. First, it suggests the framing of inter-imperial/inter-colonial, which could capture complex lateral relationships across diverse forms of imperial polities, and which had otherwise been missed by the framing of inter-national. Second, it locates colonial policy studies in the genealogy of IR in Japan, and suggests its ambiguous legacy for the disciplinary knowledge of IR after World War II in Japan, and possibly beyond.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Historicity of International PoliticsImperialism and the Presence of the Past, pp. 227 - 246Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Akami, T. (2002). Internationalizing the Pacific: The USA, Japan and the Institute of Pacific Relations in War and Peace, 1919–1945, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Akami, T. (2013). The Nation-State/Empire as a Unit of an Analysis of the History of International Relations: A Case Study in Northeast Asia, 1868–1933, in Lohr, I. & Wenzlhuemer, R. (eds.). The Nation State and Beyond: Governing Globalization Processes in the Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Centuries, 177–208, New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akami, T. (2016). A Quest to be Global: The League of Nations Health Organization and Inter-colonial Regional Governing Agendas of the Far Eastern Association of Tropical Medicine, 1910–25, The International History Review, 37(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
Akami, T. (2017). Imperial Polities and Inter-colonialism in Shaping Global Governing Norms: Public Health Expert Networks in Asia and the League of Nations Health Organization, 1908–1937, The Journal of Global History, 12(1), 4–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akami, T. (2018a). Experts and the Japanese Association of the League of Nations in the international context, 1919–1925, in O’Brien, P. & Damousi, J. (eds.). League of Nations: Histories, Legacies and Impact, 158–78, Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Akami, T. (2018b). The Limits of Peace Propaganda: The Information Section of the League of Nations and its Tokyo Office, in Brendebach, J., Herzer, M. & Tworek, H. (eds.). Exorbitant Expectations: Communicating International Organizations in the 19th and 20th Centuries, 70–90, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Akami, T. (2020). Japanese Participants at the International Studies Conference and the Institute of Pacific Relations in the Twenty Years’ Crisis, Rockefeller Archive Center Research Reports (19 November), 1–31.Google Scholar
Akashi, K. (2004). Japan’s ‘Acceptance’ of the European Law of Nation: A Brief History of International Law in Japan, c. 1853–1900, in Stolleis, M. & Yanagihara, M. (eds.). East Asian and European Perspectives on International Law, 1–22, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Anghie, A. (2005). Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baji, T. (2022). Colonial Policy Studies in Japan: Racial Visions of Nan’yo, or the Early Creation of a Global South, International Affairs, 98(1), 165–82.Google Scholar
Bull, H. (1977). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Bull, H. & Watson, A. (eds.). (1984). The Expansion of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burbank, J. & Cooper, F. (2010). Empire in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, B. & Acharya, A. (eds.). (2010). Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cotton, J. (2013). The Australian School of International Relations, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dudden, A. (2005). Japan’s Colonization of Korea: Discourse and Power, Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Dunne, T. & Reus-Smit, C. (eds.). (2018). The Globalization of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1987). The Nation-State and Violence, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Go, J. & Lawson, G. (eds.). (2017). Global Historical Sociology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilhot, N. (ed.). (2010). The Invention of International Relations Theory: Realism, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the 1954 Conference on Theory, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Guilhot, N. (2017). After the Enlightenment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imaizumi, Y. (1996). Yanaihara Tadao no kokusai kankei kenyū to shokuminchi seisaku kenkyū, Kokusai kankeigaku kenyū, 23, 137–48.Google Scholar
Iriye, A. (2002). Global Community: The Role of International Organizations in the Making of the Contemporary World, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. (2001). The Gentle Civiliser of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Legg, S. (2014). An International Anomaly? Sovereignty, the League of Nations and India’s Princely Geographies, Journal of Historical Geography, 43, 96–110.Google Scholar
Long, D. (2006). Who Killed the International Studies Conference?, Review of International Studies, 32(4), 603–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, D. & Schmidt, B. C. (eds.). (2005). Imperialism and Internationalism in the Discipline of International Relations, Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Monteiro, J. P. & Jerónimo, M. B. (2018). Internationalism and Empire: The Question of ‘Native Labour’ in the Portuguese Empire, 1919–1961, in Jackson, S. & O’Malley, A. (eds.). The Institution of International Order: From the League of Nations to the United Nations, 206–33, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mommsen, W. J. & Osterhammel, J. (1986). Imperialism and After: Continuities and Discontinuities, London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Nakano, R. (2013). Beyond the Western Liberal Order: Yanaihara Tadao and Empire as Society, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ōhata, H. (1996). Kaisetsu, in Kawata, T. (ed.). Kokusaigaku I: Kokusai kankei kenkyū, 387–94, Tokyo: Tokyo Shoseki.Google Scholar
Ōhata, T. (1986). ‘Nihon kokusai seijigakkai 30 nen no ayumi’, Kokusai seiji (October), 168–93.Google Scholar
Orford, A. (2012). The Past as Law or history? The Relevance of Imperialism for Modern International Law, IILJ Working Paper 2012/2, 1–17, New York: New York University School of Law.Google Scholar
Ōuchi, H. (1969). Kaisetsu, in Nitobe, I. (ed.). Shin Nitobe Inazō zenshū, vol. 4, 645–49, Tokyo: Kyōbunkan.Google Scholar
Pedersen, S. (2007). Back to the League of Nations: Review Essay, The American Historical Review, 112(4), 1091–117.Google Scholar
Pemberton, J.-A. (2019). The Story of International Relations, Part One: Cold-Blooded Idealists, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riemens, M. (2011). International Academic Cooperation on International Relations in the Interwar Period: The International Studies Conference, Review of International Studies, 37(2), 911–28.Google Scholar
Rietzler, K. (2009). American Foundations and the ‘Scientific Study’ of International Relations in Europe, 1910–1940. PhD thesis. University College London.Google Scholar
Rose, S. (1952). The University Teaching of International Relations: International Studies Conference, 16–20 March 1950 by G.L. Goodwin, International Affairs, 28(2), 274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakai, K. (2020). Gurōbaru kankeigaku ha naze hitsuyō nanoka, in Sakai, K. (ed.). Gurōbaru kankeigaku I: Gurōbaru kankeigaku towa nanika, Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Sakai, T. (2004). ‘Shokumin seisakugaku’ kara ‘kokusai kankei ron’ e, in Asano, T. & Matsuda, T. (eds.). Shokuminchi teikoku Nihon no hōteki tenkai, Tokyo: Shinzansha.Google Scholar
Schmidt, B. C. (1998). The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations, Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Sluga, G. & Clavin, P. (eds.). (2017). Internationalisms: A Twentieth Century History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suehiro, A. (2006). Ajia chōsa no keifu, in Suehiro, A. et al. (eds.). ‘Teikoku’ Nihon no gakuchi, vol. 6, Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Vitalis, R. (2015). White World Order, Black Power Politics: The Birth of International Relations, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Yanaihara, T. (1963a). Shokumin oyobi shokumin seisaku, in Yanaihara, T. (ed.). Yanaihara Tadao zenshū, vol. 1, Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Yanaihara, T. (1963b). Sekai keizai hatten katei toshiteno shokuminshi, in Yanaihara, T. (ed.). Yanaihara Tadao zenshū, vol. 4, Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Yanaihara, T. (1969). Henja jo (originally written in 1942), in Nitobe, I.. Shin Nitobe Inazō zenshū, vol. 4, Tokyo: Kyōbunkan.Google Scholar