Book contents
- The Historicity of International Politics
- The Historicity of International Politics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I The Imperial Past and Present in International Politics and IR
- Part II Historical Sociology and the Imperial Fundaments of International Politics
- Part III Global History and the Imperial Fundaments of International Politics
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
Part I - The Imperial Past and Present in International Politics and IR
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 June 2023
Book contents
- The Historicity of International Politics
- The Historicity of International Politics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I The Imperial Past and Present in International Politics and IR
- Part II Historical Sociology and the Imperial Fundaments of International Politics
- Part III Global History and the Imperial Fundaments of International Politics
- Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Historicity of International PoliticsImperialism and the Presence of the Past, pp. 47 - 156Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
References
Abernathy, D. B. (2000). The Dynamics of Global Dominance, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Anghie, A. (2004). Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D., Lloyd, L. & Redmond, J. (2004). International Organization in World Politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bain, W. (2003). Between Anarchy and Society: Trusteeship and the Obligations of Power, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, M. & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bayly, C. A. (2004). The Birth of the Modern World, 1780–1914, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Belich, J. (2009). Replenishing the Earth: The Settler Revolution and the Rise of the Anglo-World, 1783–1939, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buzan, B. & Lawson, G. (2014). Capitalism and the Emergent World Order, International Affairs, 90(1), 71–91.Google Scholar
Buzan, B. & Lawson, G. (2015). The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, I. (2007). International Legitimacy and World Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dodge, T. (2013). Intervention and Dreams of Exogeneous Statebuilding: The Application of Liberal Peacebuilding in Afghanistan and Iraq, Review of International Studies, 39(5), 1189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffield, M. (2007). Development, Security and Unending War: Governing the World of Peoples, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Geyer, M. & Bright, C. (1996). Global Violence and Nationalizing Wars in Eurasia and the Americas, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 38(4), 619–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gong, G. W. (1984). The Standard of ‘Civilization’ in International Society, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Grovogui, S. (1996). Sovereigns, Quasi Sovereigns, and Africans, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hameiri, S. (2010). Regulating Statehood: State Building and the Transformation of the Global Order, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keene, E. (2013). International Hierarchy and the Origins of the Modern Practice of Intervention, Review of International Studies, 29(5), 1077–90.Google Scholar
Lawson, G. & Tardelli, L. (2013). The Past, Present and the Future of Intervention, Review of International Studies, 39(5), 1233–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantilla, G. (2020). Lawmaking under Pressure: International Humanitarian Law and Internal Armed Conflict, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Meier, C. S. (2012). Leviathan 2.0, in Rosenberg, E. S. (ed.). A World Connecting, 1870–1945, 29–282, Cambridge: Belknap.Google Scholar
Millennium (2014). Special Issue: The Standard of Civilization, Millennium, 42(3), 546–849.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, H. J. (1967). To Intervene or Not to Intervene, Foreign Affairs, 45(3), 425–36.Google Scholar
Orford, A. (2011). International Authority and the Responsibility to Protect, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osterhammel, J. (2014). The Transformation of the World: A Global History of the Nineteenth Century, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pedersen, S. (2015). The Guardians: The League of Nations the Crisis of Empire, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, C. (2013). Individual Rights and the Making of the International System, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. (2004). Great Powers and Outlaw States, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sluga, G. & Clavin, P. (2017). Internationalisms: A Twentieth Century History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vincent, J. (1974). Non-Intervention and International Order, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, D. (2013). Development, Intervention and International Order, Review of International Studies, 39(5), 1213–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarakol, A. (2011). After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live with the West, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
References
Acharya, A. (2014). Who Are the Norm Makers? The Asian-African Conference in Bandung and the Evolution of Norms, Global Governance, 20(3), 405–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anghie, A. (2005). Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Badie, B. (2013). La diplomatie de connivence: Les dérives oligarchiques du système international, Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Ballantyne, T. & Burton, A. (2012). Imperien und Globalität, in Rosenberg, E. S. (ed.). Weltmärkte und Weltkriege, 287–432, München: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Becker Lorca, A. (2014). Mestizo International Law: A Global Intellectual History 1842–1933, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bosco, D. L. (2009). Five to Rule Them All: The Security Council and the Making of the Modern World, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bowden, B. (2009). The Empire of Civilization: The Evolution of an Idea, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bukovansky, M., Clark, I., Eckersley, R., Price, R. M., Reus-Smit, C. & Wheeler, N. (2012). Special Responsibilities: Global Problems and American Power, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, H. (1980). The Great Irresponsibles? The United States, the Soviet Union, and World Order, International Journal, 35(3), 437–47.Google Scholar
Bull, H. (2002). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Bull, H. & Watson, A. (eds.). (1984). The Expansion of International Society, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Buzan, B. & Lawson, G. (2015). The Global Transformation: History, Modernity and the Making of International Relations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, A. F. & Pouliot, V. (2015). How Much Is Global Governance Changing? The G20 as International Practice, Cooperation and Conflict, 50(3), 334–50.Google Scholar
Davis, C. D. (1975). The United States and the Second Hague Peace Conference: American Diplomacy and International Organization 1899–1914, Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Dunne, T. & Reus-Smit, C. (eds.). (2017). The Globalization of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Getachew, A. (2019). Worldmaking after Empire: The Rise and Fall of Self-Determination, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hajnal, P. I. (2007). The G8 System and the G20: Evolution, Role and Documentation, Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Hurd, I. (1999). Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics, International Organization, 53(2), 379–408.Google Scholar
Keene, E. (2014). The Standard of ‘Civilization’, the Expansion Thesis and the 19th-century International Social Space, Millennium, 42(3), 651–73.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. M. (2006). The Parliament of Man: The Past, Present, and Future of the United Nations, New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Mazower, M. (2009). No Enchanted Palace: The End of Empire and the Ideological Origins of the United Nations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, T. (2017). Governance by the Few in International Society: A History of the Institution of Great Powers (PhD Dissertation), Bielefeld: Bielefeld University.Google Scholar
Non-Aligned Countries. (1961). Belgrade Declaration of Non-Aligned Countries. Retrieved from http://cns.miis.edu/nam/documents/Official_Document/1st_Summit_FD_Belgrade_Declaration_1961.pdf (last accessed 1 March 2019).Google Scholar
Non-Aligned Countries. (1970). Lusaka Declaration on Peace, Independence, Development, Co-operation and Democratisation of International Relations, Lusaka. Retrieved from http://cns.miis.edu/nam/documents/Official_Document/3rd_Summit_FD_Lusaka_Declaration_1970.pdf (last accessed 1 March 2019).Google Scholar
Non-Aligned Countries. (1983). Final Document of the Seventh Conference of Head of State or Government of Non-Aligned Countries, held at New Delhi from 7 to 12 March 1983: A/38/132, S/15675. Retrieved from https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N83/085/56/pdf/N8308556.pdf?OpenElement (last accessed 1 March 2019).Google Scholar
Nullmeier, F., Geis, A. & Daase, C. (2012). Der Aufstieg der Legitimitätspolitik: Rechtfertigung und Kritik politisch-ökonomischer Ordnungen, in Geis, A., Nullmeier, F. & Daase, C. (eds.). Der Aufstieg der Legitimitätspolitik: Rechtfertigung und Kritik politisch-ökonomischer Ordnungen, 11–38, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Osterhammel, J. (2009a). Kolonialismus. Geschichte, Formen, Folgen, München: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Osterhammel, J. (2009b). Die Verwandlung der Welt: Eine Geschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts, München: C.H. Beck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, J. L. (2017). Defending Empire at the United Nations: The Politics of International Colonial Oversight in the Era of Decolonisation, The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 45(3), 525–49.Google Scholar
Pedersen, S. (2015). The Guardians: The League of Nations and the Crisis of Empire, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plesch, D. (2016). The South and Disarmament at the UN, Third World Quarterly, 37(7), 1203–18.Google Scholar
Pouliot, V. (2016). International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pouliot, V. & Thérien, J.-P. (2015). The Politics of Inclusion: Changing Patterns in the Governance of International Security, Review of International Studies, 41(2), 211–37.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, S. C. (2004). Act of Creation: The Founding of the United Nations, Cambridge: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Schulz, M. (2012). ‘Defenders of the Right?’ Diplomatic Practice and International Law in the 19th Century, in Nuzzo, L. & Vec, M. (eds.). Constructing International Law: The Birth of a Discipline, 251–75, Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Scott, J. B. (ed.). (1920). The Proceedings of the Hague Peace Conferences: Translation of the Official Texts, The Conference of 1907, Vol. I: Plenary Meetings of the Conference, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, J. B. (ed.). (1921). The Proceedings of the Hague Peace Conferences: Translation of the Official Texts, The Conference of 1907, Vol. II: Meetings of the First Commission, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
SFB 700. (2009). Grundbegriffe der Governanceforschung: Ein Beitrag aus dem Teilprojekt A1, SFB-Governance Working Paper Series. Berlin.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. (2004). Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strydom, H. (2007). The Non-Aligned Movement and the Reform of International Relations, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 11, 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UN General Assembly. (1971). Letter Dated 24 November 1971 from the Permanent Representative of China to the United Nations Addressed to the Secretary-General (A/8536 and S/10397), New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. (2005a). Reform of the Security Council: Draft Resolution (A/59/L.67), New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. (2005b). Official Records: Fifty-Ninth Session, 112nd Plenary Meeting (A/59/PV.112), New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. (2005c). Official Records: Fifty-Ninth Session, 111st Plenary Meeting (A/59/PV.111), New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
UN General Assembly. (2005d). Security Council Reform (A/59/L.64), New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
United Nations Information Organization. (ed.). (1945). Documents of the United Nations Conference on International Organization, San Francisco, 1945, Vol. XI: Commission III Security Council, London and New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Walters, F. P. (1969). A History of the League of Nations, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1972). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft: Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Zarakol, A. (ed.). (2017). Hierarchies in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
References
Aerts, J.-J., Cogneau, D., Herrera, J., de Monchy, G. & Roubaud, F. (2000). L’économie camerounaise: un espoir évanoui, Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Barnett, M. (2011). Empire of Humanity. A History of Humanitarianism, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bayart, J.-F. & Ellis, S. (2000). Africa in the World: A History of Extraversion, African Affairs, 99(395), 217–67.Google Scholar
Bayart, J.-F., Ellis, S. & Hibou, B. (1999). The Criminalization of the State in Africa, Oxford: James Currey.Google Scholar
Breckenridge, K. (2008). Power without Knowledge: Three Nineteenth Century Colonialisms in South Africa, Journal of Natal and Zulu History, 26(1), 3–30.Google Scholar
Carbone, G. (2012). Do New Democracies Deliver Social Welfare? Political Regimes and Health Policy in Ghana and Cameroon, Democratisation, 19(2), 157–83.Google Scholar
Clapham, C. (1996). Africa and the International System: The Politics of State Survival, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, F. (1996). Decolonisation and African Society: The Labor Question in French and British Africa, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, F. (2002). Africa Since 1940. The Past of the Present, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cornia, G., Jolly, R., & Stewart, F. (eds.). (1987). Adjustment with a Human Face: Protecting the Vulnerable and Promoting Growth, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deltombe, T., Domergue, M. & Tatsitsa, J. (2011). Kamerun!: une guerre cachée aux origines de la Françafrique (1948–1971), Paris: Editions La Découverte.Google Scholar
Dujardin, B., Dujardin, M. & Hermans, I. (2003). Ajustement structurel, ajustement culturel?, Santé Publique, 15(4), 503–13.Google Scholar
Eboko, F. & Awondo, P. (2018). L’État stationnaire, entre chaos et renaissance, Politique africaine, 2, 5–27.Google Scholar
Ferguson, J. (2005). Seeing Like an Oil Company: Space, Security, and Global Capital in Neoliberal Africa, American Anthropologist, 107(3), 377–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (2004). La Naissance de la biopolitique. Cours au Collège de France (1978–1979), Gallimard/EHESS/Seuil.Google Scholar
Furnivall, J. S. (1948). Colonial Policy and Practice. A Comparative Study of Burma and Netherlands India, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gemalto. (2018, January 28). Cameroon’s new national identity card. Retrieved October 16, 2020, from www.thalesgroup.com/en/markets/digital-identity-and-security/government/customer-cases/new-national-identity-card-for-cameroonGoogle Scholar
Hennock, E. P. (2007). The Origin of the Welfare State in England and Germany, 1850–1914: Social Policies Compared, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herbst, J. (2000). States and Power in Africa: Comparative Lessons in Authority and Control, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hibou, B. (1999). La ‘décharge’, nouvel interventionnisme, Politique Africaine, 73, 6–15.Google Scholar
Joseph, R. A. (1980). Church, State, and Society in Colonial Cameroun, International Journal of African Historical Studies, 13(3), 5–32.Google Scholar
Kamdoum, A. (1994). Planification sanitaire et ajustement structurel au Cameroun (No. 29), Paris: CEPED.Google Scholar
Krasner, S. D. & Risse, T. (2014). External Actors, State-Building, and Service Provision in Areas of Limited Statehood: Introduction, Governance, 27(4), 545–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhnle, S. & Sander, A. (2010). The Emergence of the Western Welfare State, in Castles, F. G., Leibfried, S., Lewis, J., Obinger, H. & Pierson, C. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State, 73–92, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lachenal, G. (2010). Le médecin qui voulut être roi, Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 65(1), 121–56.Google Scholar
Lachenal, G. (2015). Lessons in Medical Nihilism: Virus Hunters, Neoliberalism, and the AIDS Crisis in Cameroon, in Geissler, W. (ed.). Para-States and Medical Science: Making African Global Health, 103–41, Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Linjuom Mbowou, C. R. (2013). Etre Sans Papier Chez Soi: Identification, Visibilité et Invisibilité dans les Marges Camerounaises du Bassin de Lac Tchad (Memoire de Master Recherche de Science Politique), Paris: Université Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Mamdani, M. (1996). Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mbembe, A. (1991). Désordres, résistances et productivité, Politique Africaine, 42, 2–8.Google Scholar
Mbembe, A. (1996). La naissance du maquis dans le Sud Cameroun, 1920–1960, Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Mbembe, A. (2013). Sortir de la grande nuit: Essai sur l’Afrique décolonisée. La Découverte.Google Scholar
Mbembe, A. (2017). Au Cameroun, le crépuscule d’une dictature à huis clos, Le Monde, 9(10), 2017.Google Scholar
Médard, J.-F. (1992). Le ‘Big Man’ en Afrique: Esquisse d’analyse du politicien entrepreneuer, L’Année Sociologique, 42, 167–92.Google Scholar
Mittelman, J. N. (1975). Ideology and Politics in Uganda: From Obote to Amin, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mkandawire, T. (2010). On Tax Efforts and Colonial Heritage in Africa, Journal of Development Studies, 46(10), 1647–69.Google Scholar
Morcillo Laiz, Á. & Schlichte, K. (2016). Rationality and International Domination: Revisiting Max Weber, International Political Sociology, 10(2), 168–84.Google Scholar
Munyambonera, E., Katunze, M., Munu, M. L. & Sserunjogi, B. (2018). Expanding the Pension Sector in Uganda, Research Series No. 143, Kampala: Makerere Economic Policy Research Centre.Google Scholar
Njiale, P. M. (2006). Crise de la société, crise de l’école. Le cas du Cameroun, Revue internationale d’éducation de Sèvres, 41, 53–63.Google Scholar
Noiriel, G. (1996). The French Melting Pot: Immigration, Citizenship, and National Identity, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Nyamnjoh, F. B. (1999). Cameroon: A Country United by Ethnic Ambition and Difference, African Affairs, 98(390), 101–18.Google Scholar
Ocheng, M. T. K. (2004). Basic Education through Primary Education Cycle in Uganda. 1925 to 1999: Rationale and Analysis of Policy Changes (PhD dissertation), Kampala: Makerere University.Google Scholar
Okuonzi, S. A. & Macrae, J. (1995). Whose Policy Is It Anyway? International and National Influences on Health Policy Development in Uganda, Health Policy and Planning, 10(2), 122–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pongou, R., Ezzati, M. & Salomon, J. A. (2006). Household and Community Socioeconomic and Environmental Determinants of Child Nutritional Status in Cameroon, BMC Public Health, 6(1).Google Scholar
Reid, R. J. (2017). A History of Modern Uganda, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rubongoya, J. B. (2018). ‘Movement Legacy’ and Neoliberalism as Political Settlement in Uganda’s Political Economy. In Wiegratz, J., Martiniello, G. & Greco, E. (eds.). Uganda: The Dynamics of Neoliberal Transformation, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Schlichte, K. (2008). Uganda, Or: The Internationalisation of Rule, Civil Wars, 10(4), 369–83.Google Scholar
Schlichte, K. (2017). The International State. Comparing Statehood in Central Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, in Heathershaw, J. & Schatz, E. (eds.). Paradox of Power: The Logics of State Weakness in Eurasia, 105–19, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, M., Kentikelenis, A. & Stubbs, T. (2017). Structural Adjustment Programmes Adversely Affect Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic-Narrative Review of Their Effect on Child and Maternal Health, Public Health Reviews 38(1), 13.Google Scholar
Toro District Annual Report 1956, District Commissioner’s Office, Fort Portal, Toro District, 20 March, 1957, Mountains of the Moon University Archive, Fort Portal, Box 414.Google Scholar
Vaughan, M. (1991). Curing Their Ills: Colonial Power and African Illness, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Veit, A., Schlichte, K. & Karadag, R. (2017). The Social Question and State Formation in British Africa: Egypt, South Africa and Uganda in Comparison, European Journal of Sociology, 58(2), 237–64.Google Scholar
Wacquant, L. (2010). La fabrique de l’Etat neoliberal. ‘Workfare’, ‘prison fare’ et insécurité sociale, Civilisations, 59(1), 151–72.Google Scholar
Zartman, I. W. (1995). Introduction: Posing the Problem of State Collapse, in Zartman, I. W. (ed.). Collapsed States: The Disintegration and Restoration of Legitimate Authority, 1–11, Boulder: L. Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
References
Borschberg, P. (2003). Portuguese, Spanish and Dutch Plans to Construct a Fort in the Straits of Singapore, ca. 1584–1625, Archipel, 65, 55–88.Google Scholar
Borschberg, P. (2013). From Self-Defense to an Instrument of War: Dutch Privateering Around the Malay Peninsula in the Early Seventeenth Century, Journal of Early Modern History, 17, 32–52.Google Scholar
de Carvalho, B. (2014). The Confessional State in International Politics: Tudor England, Religion, and the Eclipse of Dynasticism, Diplomacy & Statecraft, 25(3), 407–31Google Scholar
de Carvalho, B. (2015). Private Force and the Making of States, c. 1100–1500, in Abrahamsen, R. & Leander, A. (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Private Security Studies, 11–19, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
de Carvalho, B. (2016). The Making of the Political Subject: Subjects and Territory in the Formation of the State, Theory and Society, 45(1), 57–88.Google Scholar
de Carvalho, B. & Paras, A. (2015). Sovereignty and Solidarity: Moral Obligation, Confessional England, and the Huguenots, The International History Review, 37(1), 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colás, A. (2016). Barbary Coast in the Expansion of International Society: Piracy, Privateering, and Corsairing as Primary Institutions, Review of International Studies, 42(5), 840–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, R. (1962). The Rise of the English Shipping Industry, London: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Ekin, D. (2006). The Stolen Village: Baltimore and the Barbary Pirates, Dublin: O’Brien Press.Google Scholar
Emmer, P. C. (2003). The First Global War: The Dutch versus Iberia in Asia, Africa and the New World, 1590–1609, e-Journal of Portuguese History, 1(1).Google Scholar
Glete, J. (2000). Warfare at Seat, 1500–1650: Maritime Conflicts and the Transformation of Europe, Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hanna, M. G. (2015). Pirate Nests and the Rise of the British Empire, 1570–1740, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
‘t Hart, M. (2014). The Dutch Wars of Independence: Warfare and Commerce in the Netherlands 1570–1680, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyman, J. M. and Smart, A. (1999). States and Illegal Practices: An Overview, in Heyman, J. M. (ed.). States and Illegal Practices, 1–24, Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Keene, E. (2007). A Case Study of the Construction of International Hierarchy: British Treaty-Making against the Slave Trade in the Early Nineteenth Century, International Organization, 61(2), 311–39.Google Scholar
Leira, H. (2017). Political Change and Historical Analogies, Global Affairs, 3(1), 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leira, H. & de Carvalho, B. (2010). Privateers of the North Sea: At Worlds End – French Privateers in Norwegian Waters, in Colas, A. & Mabee, B. (eds.). Mercenaries, Pirates, Bandits and Empires, 55–82, London: Hurst Publishers.Google Scholar
Leira, H. & de Carvalho, B. (2018). The Function of Myths in International Relations: Discipline and Identity, in Gofas, A., Hamati-Ataya, I. & Onuf, N. (eds.). The Sage Handbook of the History, Philosophy and Sociology of International Relations, 222–35, London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Leonard, A. B. (ed.). (2016). Marine Insurance: Origins and Institutions, 1300–1850, Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Murphy, M. (2011). Somalia: The New Barbary? Piracy and Islam in the Horn of Africa, London: Hurst Publishers.Google Scholar
Neff, S. C. (2005). War and the Law of Nations: A General History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pennell, C. R. (1994). Accommodation between European and Islamic Law in the Western Mediterranean in the Early Nineteenth Century, British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 21 (2), 159–89.Google Scholar
Pennell, C. R. (2001). Bandits at Sea: A Pirates Reader, New York: New York University PressGoogle Scholar
Phillips, A., & Sharman, J. (2015). International Order in Diversity: War, Trade and Rule in the Indian Ocean, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Pilgrim, D. (1975). The Colbert-Seignelay Naval Reforms and the Beginnings of the War of the League of Augsburg, French Historical Studies, 9(2), 235–62.Google Scholar
Rodger, N. A. M. (2014). The Law and Language of Private Naval Warfare, The Mariner’s Mirror, 100(1), 5–16.Google Scholar
Starkey, D. J. & McCarthy, M. (2014). A Persistent Phenomenon: Private Prize-Taking in the British Atlantic, c. 1540–1856, in Amirell, S. E. & Müller, L. (eds.). Persistent Piracy: Maritime Violence and State-Formation in Global Historical Perspective, 131–51, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sutton, A. (2009). Atlantic Orientalism: How Language in Jefferson’s America Defeated the Barbary Pirates, darkmatter Journal, 5, 53–67.Google Scholar
Wenner, M. W. (1980). The Arab/Muslim Presence in Medieval Central Europe, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 12(1), 59–79.Google Scholar
Windler, C. (2001a). Diplomatic History as a Field for Cultural Analysis: Muslim-Christian Relations in Tunis, 1700–1840, The Historical Journal, 44(1), 79–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windler, C. (2001b). Representing a State in a Segmentary Society: French Consuls in Tunis from the Ancien Régime to the Restoration, The Journal of Modern History, 73(2), 233–74.Google Scholar
References
Albert, M., Brunkhorst, H., Neumann, I.B. & Stetter, S. (2023). The Social Evolution of World Politics, Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
Allsen, T. T. (1987). Mongol Imperialism: The Politics of the Great Qan Möngke in China, Russia, and the Islamic Lands, 1251–1259, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Barfield, T. J. (1989). The Perilous Frontier: Nomadic Empires and China, Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Barfield, T. J. (2010). Afghanistan: A Cultural and Political History, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boeck, B. J. (2009). Imperial Boundaries: Cossack Communities and Empire-Building in the Age of Peter the Great, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Di Cosmo, N. (2002). Ancient China and Its Enemies: The Rise of Nomadic Power in East Asian History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, A. (1999). A Precarious Balance: Conflict, Trade and Diplomacy on the Russian-Ottoman Frontier, Istanbul: İsis Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, A. W. (1970). The Russian Annexation of the Crimea 1772–1783, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Golden, P. B. (1992). An Introduction to the History of the Turkic Peoples, Wiesbaden: Otto Harassowitz.Google Scholar
Jordheim, H. & Neumann, I. B. (2011). Empire, Imperialism and Conceptual History, Journal of International Relations and Development, 14(2), 153–85.Google Scholar
Kasaba, R. (2009). A Moveable Empire: Ottoman Nomads, Migrants & Refugees, Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Khodarkovsky, M. (2004). Russia’s Steppe Frontier: The Making of a Colonial Empire, 1500–1800, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Khazanov, A. (1994). Nomads and the Outside World. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Kotkin, S. (2007). “Mongol Commonwealth? Exchange and Governance across the Post-Mongol Space”. Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History. 8(3), 487–531.Google Scholar
McNeill, W. (1964). Europe’s Steppe Frontier 1500–1800, Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Nexon, D. H. & Wright, T. (2007). What’s at Stake in the American Empire Debate, The American Political Science Review, 101(2), 253–71.Google Scholar
Pardesi, M. S. (2018). Mughal Hegemony and the Emergence of South Asia as a ‘Region’ for Regional Order-Building, European Journal of International Relations, 25(1), 276–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, W. H. (1996). “Historical Events as Transformations of Structures: Inventing Revolution at the Bastille”. Theory and Society, 25(6), 841–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sverdrup-Thygeson, B. (2012). “A Neighbourless Empire? The Forgotten Diplomatic Tradition of Imperial China”, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 7(3) 245–267.Google Scholar
Wigen, E. (2019). O Brother, Where Art Thou? Kinship in Turkish Region-Building, in Haugevik, K. M. & Neumann, I. B. (eds.). Kinship in International Relations, 121–37, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zerjal, T. et al. (2003). The Genetic Legacy of the Mongols, American Journal of Human Genetics, 72(3), 717–21.Google Scholar
References
Albert, M. & Stichweh, R. (2007). Weltstaat und Weltstaatlichkeit: Beobachtungen globaler politischer Strukturbildung, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
Albert, M., Brunkhorst, H., Neumann, I.B. & Stetter, S. (2023). The Social Evolution of World Politics, Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar
Aydin, C. (2016). Regionen und Reiche in der politischen Geschichte des langen 19. Jahrhunderts (1750–1924), in Conrad, S. & Osterhammel, J. (eds.). Geschichte der Welt: Wege zur modernen Welt 1750–1870, 35–253, Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Berger, S. & Miller, A. (2015). Building Nations in and with Empires: A Reassessment, in Berger, S. & Miller, A. (eds.). Nationalizing Empires, Budapest: CEU Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunkhorst, H. (2014). Critical Theory of Legal Revolutions: Evolutionary Perspectives, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Bull, H. & Watson, A. (eds.) (1984). The Expansion of International Society, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dunne, T. & Reus-Smit, C. (eds.) (2017). The Globalization of International Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krajewski, M. (2006). Restlosigkeit: Weltprojekte um 1900, Frankfurt: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M. & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World Society and the Nation-State, American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 144–81.Google Scholar
Münkler, H. (2007). Empires: The Logic of World Domination from Ancient Rome to the United States, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Münkler, H. (2019). Imperiale Ordnung. Die Governance-Leistung von Imperien, in Hausteiner, E. M. & Huhnholz, S. (eds.). Imperien verstehen. Theorien, Typen, Transformationen, 71–99, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Neumann, I. B. & Nexon, D. H. (2018). Hegemonic-Order Theory: A Field-Theoretic Account, European Journal of International Relations, 24(3), 662–86.Google Scholar
Nipperdey, T. (1983). Deutsche Geschichte 1800–1866: Bürgerwelt und starker Staat, Munich: C.H. Beck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osiander, A. (2001). Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Westphalian Myth, International Organization, 55(2), 251–87.Google Scholar
Reinhart, W. (2015). Introduction, in Reinhart, W. (ed.). Empires and Encounters: 1350–1750, 30–52, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schlichte, K. (1998). La Françafrique: Postkolonialer Habitus und Klientelismus in der französischen Afrikapolitik, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen, 5(2), 309–43.Google Scholar
Sewell, W. H. Jr. (2005). Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, M. (2000). Theory of the Global State: Globality as Unfinished Revolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, J. D. (1961). The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations, World Politics, 14(1), 77–92.Google Scholar
Stetter, S. (2019). Das Imperium schlägt (immer wieder) zurück: Imperien, Kolonialismus und Postkolonialismus im politischen System der Weltgesellschaft, in Hausteiner, E. M. & Huhnholz, S. (eds.). Imperien verstehen. Theorien, Typen, Transformationen, 255–77, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Werner, M. & Zimmermann, B. (2002). Vergleich, Transfer, Verflechtung. Der Ansatz der Histoire croisée und die Herausforderung des Transnationalen, Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 28(4), 607–36.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. H. (2016). The Holy Roman Empire: A Thousand Years of Europe’s History, London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar