Conclusion

doi:10.1017/9781009199100.018

Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 June 2023

Edited by

Klaus Schlichte and

Stephan Stetter

Show author details

Klaus Schlichte: Affiliation:
Universität Bremen
Stephan Stetter: Affiliation:
Universität der Bundeswehr München

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: The Historicity of International Politics
Imperialism and the Presence of the Past
, pp. 289 - 302

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009199100.018 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achen, C. H. (2002). Toward a New Political Methodology: Microfoundations and ART, Annual Review of Political Science, 5, 423–50.Google Scholar

Barkawi, T., Bell, D. & Zarakol, A. (forthcoming). What Is ‘Historicism’?, in Goddard, S., Lawson, G. & Sending, O. J. (eds.). Oxford Handbook of International Political Sociology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bevir, M. (2017). Historicism and the Human Sciences in Victorian Britain, in Bevir, Mark (ed.). Historicism and the Human Sciences in Victorian Britain, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bially Mattern, J. & Zarakol, A. (2016). Hierarchies in World Politics, International Organization, 70(3), 623–54.Google Scholar

Braumoeller, B. & Sartori, A. E. (2004). The Promise and Perils of Statistics in International Relations, in Sprinz, D. & Wolinsky, Y. (eds.). Models, Numbers, and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Buzan, B. & Little, R. (2001). Why International Relations Has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to Do about It, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 30(1), 19–39.Google Scholar

Çapan, Z. G. & Zarakol, A. (2018). Between ‘East’ and ‘West’: Travelling Theories, Travelling Imaginations, in Gofas, A., Hamati-Ataya, I. & Onuf, N. (eds.). The SAGE Handbook of the History, Philosophy and Sociology of International Relations. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Collins, R. (1984). Statistics versus Words, Sociological Theory, 2: 329–62.Google Scholar

Freeman, B., Kim, D. G. & Lake, D. A. (2022). Race in International Relations: Beyond the ‘Norm Against Noticing’, Annual Review of Political Science, May. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051820-120746.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, S. (1977). An American Social Science: International Relations, Daedalus, 106(3), 41–60.Google Scholar

Keynes, J. M. (1921). A Treatise on Probability, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

King, G., Keohane, R. O. & Verba, S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Lake, D. (2011). Hierarchy in International Relations, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Mearsheimer, J. J. & Walt, S. M. (2013). Leaving Theory Behind: Why Simplistic Hypothesis Testing Is Bad for International Relations, European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 427–57.Google Scholar

Maliniak, D., Oakes, A., Peterson, S. & Tierney, M. J. (2011). International Relations in the US Academy, International Studies Quarterly, 55(2), 437–64.Google Scholar

Maliniak, D., Peterson, S., Powers, R. & Tierney, M. J. (2014). TRIP 2014 Faculty Survey, Williamsburg: Institute for the Theory and Practice of International Relations. https://trip.wm.edu/charts/Google Scholar

Maliniak, D., Peterson, S. & Tierney, M. J. (2012). TRIP Around the World: Teaching, Research, and Policy Views of International Relations Faculty in 20 Countries, Williamsburg: Institute for the Theory and Practice of International Relations.Google Scholar

Ross, D. (1993). The Origins of American Social Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Steinmetz, G. (2020). Historicism and Positivism in Sociology: From Weimar Germany to the Contemporary United States, in Herman, P. & van Veldhuizen, A. (eds.). Historicism: A Travelling Concept, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Zarakol, A. (2011a). After Defeat: How the East Learned to Live with the West, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Zarakol, A. (2011b). What Makes Terrorism Modern? Terrorism, Legitimacy, and the International System, Review of International Studies, 37(5), 2311–36.Google Scholar

Zarakol, A. (2017a). States and Ontological Security: A Historical Rethinking, Cooperation & Conflict, 52(1), 48–68.Google Scholar

Zarakol, A. (2017b). Hierarchies in World Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Zarakol, A. (2018). Sovereign Equality as Misrecognition, Review of International Studies, 44(5), 848–62.Google Scholar

Zarakol, A. (2022). Before the West: The Rise and Fall of Eastern World Orders, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Book contents

Conclusion

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive