Book contents
- The High-Mountain CryosphereEnvironmental Changes and Human Risks
- The High-Mountain Cryosphere
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Book part
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Global drivers
- Part II Processes
- 7 Implications for hazard and risk of seismic and volcanic responses to climate change in the high-mountain cryosphere
- 8 Catastrophic mass wasting in high mountains
- 9 Glacier- and permafrost-related slope instabilities
- 10 Erosion and sediment flux in mountain watersheds
- 11 Glaciers as water resources
- 12 Glacier floods
- 13 Ecosystem change in high tropical mountains
- Part III Consequences and responses
- Part IV Conclusions
- Index
- References
10 - Erosion and sediment flux in mountain watersheds
from Part II - Processes
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2015
Book contents
- The High-Mountain CryosphereEnvironmental Changes and Human Risks
- The High-Mountain Cryosphere
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Book part
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Global drivers
- Part II Processes
- 7 Implications for hazard and risk of seismic and volcanic responses to climate change in the high-mountain cryosphere
- 8 Catastrophic mass wasting in high mountains
- 9 Glacier- and permafrost-related slope instabilities
- 10 Erosion and sediment flux in mountain watersheds
- 11 Glaciers as water resources
- 12 Glacier floods
- 13 Ecosystem change in high tropical mountains
- Part III Consequences and responses
- Part IV Conclusions
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The High-Mountain CryosphereEnvironmental Changes and Human Risks, pp. 166 - 183Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Buffington, JM, Montgomery, DR, Geomorphic classification of rivers. In Treatise on Geomorphology, Volume 9, Fluvial Geomorphology, ed. Shroder, J, Wohl, E (San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2013), pp. 730–767.Google Scholar
Hungr, O, Evans, S, Bovis, MJ, Hutchinson, JN, A review of the classification of landslides of the flow type. Environmental and Engineering Geoscience, 7 (2001), 221–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, M, Steep headwater channels. In Treatise on Geomorphology, Volume 9, Fluvial Geomorphology, ed. Shroder, J, Wohl, E (San Diego, CA: Academic Press), pp. 528–549.Google Scholar
Rickenmann, D, McArdell, BW, Continuous measurement of sediment transport in the Erlenbach stream using piezoelectric bedload impact sensors. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 32 (2007), 1362–1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavigne, F, Suwa, H, Contrasts between debris flows, hyperconcentrated flows and stream flows at a channel of Mount Semeru, East Java. Geomorphology, 61 (2004), 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, TC, Hyperconcentrated flow-transitional process between water flow and debris flow. In Debris-flow Hazards and Related Phenomena, ed. Jakob, M, Hungr, O (Chichester: Springer Praxis Publishing, 2005), pp. 159–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, TC, Costa, JE, A rheologic classification of subaerial sediment–water flows. Geological Society of America, Reviews in Engineering Geology, 7 (1987), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchi, L, D'Agostino, V, Estimation of debris-flow magnitude in the Eastern Italian Alps. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 29:2 (2004), 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickenmann, D, Koschni, A, Sediment loads due to fluvial transport and debris flows during the 2005 flood events in Switzerland. Hydrological Processes, 24 (2010), 993–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomery, DR, Buffington, JM, Channel-reach morphology in mountain drainage basins. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 109 (1997), 596–611.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, J, Dietrich, WE, Valley incision by debris flows: evidence of a topographic signature. Water Resources Research, 39 (2003), 1089. doi: 10.1029/2001WR001057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchner, JW, Finkel, RC, Riebe, CS, et al., Mountain erosion over 10 yr, 10 k.y., and 10 m.y. time scales. Geology, 29:7 (2001), 591–594.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickenmann, D, Empirical relationships for debris flows. Natural Hazards, 19 (1999), 47–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakob, M, Debris flow hazard analysis. In Debris-flow Hazards and Related Phenomena, ed. Jakob, M, Hungr, O (Chichester: Springer Praxis Publishing, 2005), pp. 411–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakob, M, A size classification for debris flows. Engineering Geology, 79 (2005), 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, AM, The coupling status of alluvial fans and debris cones: a review and synthesis. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 37 (2012), 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrascheck, A, Kienholz, H, Hazard assessment and mapping of mountain risks in Switzerland. In 3rd International Conference on Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation, ed. Rickenmann, D, Chen, CL (Rotterdam: Millpress, 2003), pp. 25–38.Google Scholar
Greminger, P, Managing the risks of natural hazards. In 3rd International Conference on Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation, ed. Rickenmann, D, Chen, CL (Rotterdam: Millpress, 2003), pp. 39–56.Google Scholar
Fell, R, Ho, KKS, Lacasse, S, Leroi, E, A framework for landslide risk assessment and management. In Landslide Risk Management, ed. Hungr, O, Fell, R (London: Taylor & Francis, 2005), pp. 3–25.Google Scholar
Porter, M, Morgenstern, N, Landslide Risk Evaluation. Canadian Technical Guidelines and Best Practices Related to Landslides. A National Initiative for Loss Reduction. Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 7312, 2013, doi:10.4095/292234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneuwly-Bollschweiler, M, Corona, C, Stoffel, M, How to improve dating quality and reduce noise in tree-ring based debris-flow reconstructions. Quaternary Geochronology, 18 (2013), 110–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiverrell, R, Jakob, M, Radiocarbon dating: alluvial fan/debris cone evolution and hazards. In Dating Torrential Processes on Fans and Cones, ed. Schneuwly-Bollschweiler, M, Stoffel, M, Rudolf-Miklau, F. (New York: Springer, 2013), pp. 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innes, JL, Lichenometric dating of debris-flow deposits in the Scottish Highlands. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 8 (2006), 579–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griswold, JP, Iverson, RM, Mobility Statistics and Automated Hazard Mapping for Debris Flows and Rock Avalanches. U.S. Geological Survey, Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5276, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheidl, C, Rickenmann, D, Empirical prediction of debris-flow mobility and deposition on fans. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 35 (2010), 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hungr, O, Morgan, GC, Kellerhals, R, Quantitative analysis of debris torrent hazards for design of remedial measures. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 21 (1984), 663–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kienholz, H, Frick, E, Gertsch, E, Assessment tools for mountain torrents: SEDEX© and bed load assessment matrix. In Proceedings of the International Interpraevent Symposium, Taipei, Taiwan (2010), pp. 245–256.Google Scholar
Jakob, M, Morphometric and geotechnical controls of debris flow frequency and magnitude in southwestern British Columbia. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia (1996).Google Scholar
Jakob, M, The fallacy of frequency: Statistical techniques for debris-flow frequency–magnitude analyses. In Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Landslides, Banff ISL, June 3–8, 2012.Google Scholar
Jakob, M, Lambert, S, Climate change effects on landslides along the south-west coast of British Columbia. Geomorphology, 107 (2009), 275–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoffel, M, Mendlik, T, Schneuwly-Bollschweiler, M, Gobiet, A, Possible impacts of climate change on debris-flow activity in the Swiss Alps. Climate Change, 122 (2014), 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, M, Haeberli, W, Climatic change and debris flow activity in high-mountain areas: a case study in the Swiss Alps. Catena Supplement, 22 (1992), 59–72.Google Scholar
Huggel, C, Clague, JJ, Korup, O, Is climate change responsible for changing landslide activity in high mountains? Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 37 (2012), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arenson, LU, Jakob, M, Periglacial geohazard risks and ground temperature increases. IAEG XII Congress – Engineering Geology for Society and Territory, Torino, Italy, September 15–19, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Agostino, V, Lenzi, MA, Bedload transport in the instrumented watershed of the Rio Cordon: Part II. Analysis of the bedload rate. Catena, 36 (1999), 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickenmann, D, Comparison of bed load transport in torrents and gravel bed streams. Water Resources Research, 37 (2001), 3295–3305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comiti, F, Mao, L, Recent advances in the dynamics of steep channels. In Gravel-Bed Rivers: Processes, Tools, Environments, ed. Church, M, Biron, PM, Roy, AG. (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2012), pp. 353–377.Google Scholar
Barry, JJ, Buffington, JM, King, JG, A general power equation for predicting bedload transport rates in gravel bed rivers. Water Resources Research, 40 (2004), doi:10.1029/2004WR003190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitsche, M, Rickenmann, D, Turowski, JM, Badoux, A, Kirchner, JW, Evaluation of bedload transport predictions using flow resistance equations to account for macro-roughness in steep mountain streams. Water Resources Research, 47 (2011), W08513, doi:10.1029/2011WR010645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, A, Flow resistance in steep streams: an experimental study. Water Resources Research, 46 (2010), doi:10.1029/2009WR007913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassan, MA, Church, M, Lisle, TE, Sediment transport and channel morphology of small, forested streams. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 41 (2005), 853–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bathurst, JC, Effect of coarse surface layer on bed-load transport. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 133 (2007), 1192–1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, MP, Dietrich, WE, Venditti, JG, Is the critical Shields stress for incipient sediment motion dependent on channel-bed slope? Journal of Geophysical Research, 113 (2008), F02008, doi:10.1029/2007JF000831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yager, EM, Kirchner, JW, Dietrich, WE, Calculating bedload transport in steep, boulder-bed channels. Water Resources Research, 43 (2007), doi:10.1029/2006WR005432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palt, SM, Sedimenttransportprozesse im Himalaya-Karakorum und ihre Bedeutung für Wasserkraftanlagen. Institut für Wasserwirtschaft und Kulturtechnik, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), Mitteilungen 209 (2001) [in German].Google Scholar
Chiari, M, Friedl, K, Rickenmann, D, A one dimensional bedload transport model for steep slopes. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 48 (2010), 152–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickenmann, D, Recking, A, Evaluation of flow resistance equations using a large field data base. Water Resources Research, 47 (2011), W07538, doi:10.1029/2010WR009793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickenmann, D, Alluvial steep channels: flow resistance, bedload transport and transition to debris flows. In Gravel-Bed Rivers: Processes, Tools, Environments, ed. Church, M, Biron, PM, Roy, AG. (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2012), pp. 386–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oden, ME, Debris recharge rates in torrented gullies on the Queen Charlotte Islands. MSc thesis, University of British Columbia (1994).Google Scholar
Jakob, M, Bovis, M, Oden, M, The significance of channel recharge rates for estimating debris-flow magnitude and frequency. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 30 (2005), 755–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, ER, Pitlick, J, Sediment supply and channel morphology in mountain river systems: 1. Relative importance of lithology, topography, and climate. Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surfaces, 118 (2013), doi:10.1002/2013JF002843.Google Scholar
Recking, A, Influence of sediment supply on mountain streams bedload transport. Geomorphology, 175–176 (2012), 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilford, DJ, Sakals, ME, Innes, JL, Sidle, RC, Bergerud, WA, Recognition of debris flow, debris flood and flood hazard through watershed morphometrics. Landslides, 1 (2004), 61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, JE, Rheologic, geomorphic, and sedimentologic differentiation of water floods, hyperconcentrated flows, and debris flows. In Flood Geomorphology, ed. Baker, VR, Kochel, RC, Patton, PC (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1988), pp. 113–122.Google Scholar
Korup, O, Landslides in the fluvial system. In Treatise on Geomorphology, Volume 9, Fluvial Geomorphology, ed. Shroder, J, Wohl, E (San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2013), pp. 244–259.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, M, Mani, P, Romang, H, Magnitude–frequency aspects of Alpine debris flows. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 90 (1997), 415–420.Google Scholar
Stoffel, M, Bollschweiler, M, Tree-ring analysis in natural hazards research: an overview. Natural Hazards and Earth Systems Science, 8 (2008), 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickenmann, D, Laigle, D, McArdell, BW, Hübl, J, Comparison of 2D debris-flow simulation models with field events. Computational Geosciences, 10 (2006), 241–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2
- Cited by