Bibliography

Nicolai K. Knudsen

doi:10.1017/9781009122672.014

Agosta, L. (2010). Empathy in the Context of Philosophy, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (1971, 21 October). Martin Heidegger at Eighty (A. Hofstadter, trans.), New York Review of Books. www.nybooks.com/articles/1971/10/21/martin-heidegger-at-eighty/ [Accessed 2020-11-09].Google Scholar

Bambach, C. R. (2003). Heidegger’s Roots: Nietzsche, National Socialism and the Greeks, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S. (1997). Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Beinsteiner, A. (2017). Unobtrusive Governance: Heidegger and Foucault on the Sources of Social Normativity. In Schmid, H. B. & Thonhauser, G., eds, From Conventionalism to Social Authenticity: Heidegger’s Anyone and Contemporary Social Theory, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 79–97.CrossRef Google Scholar

de Beistegui, M. (1998). Heidegger and the Political: Dystopias, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bergo, B. (2017). ‘Sterben Sie?’ The Problem of Dasein and ‘Animals’ … of Various Kinds. In Mitchell, A. J. & Trawny, P., eds, Heidegger’s Black Notebooks, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 52–73.CrossRef Google Scholar

Blattner, W. (1994). The Concept of Death in Being and Time. Man and World, 27(1), 49–70.CrossRef Google Scholar

Blattner, W. (1999). Heidegger’s Temporal Idealism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Blattner, W. (2005). Temporality. In Dreyfus, H. & Wrathall, M., eds, A Companion to Heidegger, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 311–324.Google Scholar

Blattner, W. (2013). Authenticity and Resoluteness. In Wrathall, M., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger’s Being and Time, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 320–337.Google Scholar

Boedeker, E. C. (2001). Individual and Community in Early Heidegger: Situating das Man, the Man-Self, and Self-Ownership in Dasein’s Ontological Structure. Inquiry, 44(1), 63–99.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1992). Back to History: An Interview. In Wolin, R., ed., The Heidegger Controversy: A Critical Reader, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 264–271.Google Scholar

Bratman, M. (1999). Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and Agency, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bratman, M. (2013). Shared Agency: A Planning Theory of Acting Together, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Buber, M. (2002). Between Man and Man (Smith, R. G., trans.), Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Caputo, J. D. (1987). Radical Hermeneutics: Repetition, Deconstruction, and the Hermeneutic Project, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Carman, T. (1994). On Being Social: A Reply to Olafson. Inquiry, 37(2), pp. 203–223.Google Scholar

Carman, T. (2000). Must We Be Inauthentic? In Wrathall, M. & Malpas, J., eds, Heidegger, Authenticity, and Modernity, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 13–28.Google Scholar

Carman, T. (2002). Was Heidegger a Linguistic Idealist? Inquiry, 45, pp. 205–216.Google Scholar

Carman, T. (2005). Authenticity. In Dreyfus, H. & Wrathall, M., eds, A Companion to Heidegger, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 285–296.CrossRef Google Scholar

Carman, T. (2007). Heidegger’s Analytic: Interpretation, Discourse and Authenticity in Being and Time, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Carman, T. (2014). Things Fall Apart: Heidegger on the Constancy and Finality of Death. In McManus, D., ed., Heidegger, Authenticity and the Self: Themes from Division Two of Being and Time, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 135–145.CrossRef Google Scholar

Carr, D. (1991). Time, Narrative, and History, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Carruthers, P. (2012). Mindreading in Infancy. Mind & Language, 28(2), pp. 141–172.Google Scholar

Crowell, S. G. (2001). Husserl, Heidegger, and the Space of Meaning: Paths toward Transcendental Phenomenology, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Crowell, S. G. (2003). Facticity and Transcendental Philosophy. In Malpas, J., ed., From Kant to Davidson: Philosophy and the Idea of the Transcendental, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 100–121.Google Scholar

Crowell, S. G. (2012). Authentic Historicality. In Carr, D. & Cheung, C.-F., eds, Space, Time and Culture, Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media, pp. 57–72.Google Scholar

Crowell, S. G. (2013). Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crowell, S. G., & Malpas, J. (2007). Transcendental Heidegger, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cykowski, E. (2021). Heidegger’s Metaphysical Abyss: Between the Human and the Animal, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dahlstrom, D. (2005). Heidegger’s Transcendentalism. Research in Phenomenology, 35(1), pp. 29–54.Google Scholar

Darwall, S. (2011). Being With. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 49, pp. 4–24.Google Scholar

Davidson, D. (2001). Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective: Philosophical Essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory Sense-Making: An Enactive Approach to Social Cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6, pp. 485–507.CrossRef Google Scholar

De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E., & Gallagher, S. (2010). Can Social Interaction Constitute Social Cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(10), pp. 441–447.Google Scholar

De Jaegher, H., & Froese, T. (2009). On the Role of Social Interaction in Individual Agency. Adaptive Behavior, 17(5), pp. 444–460.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (1989). Of Spirit: Heidegger and the Question, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Di Cesare, D. (2014). Heidegger e gli ebrei: i ‘Quaderni neri’, Milan: Bollati Boringhieri.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. (1991). Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. (1995). Interpreting Heidegger on Das Man. Inquiry, 38(4), pp. 423–430.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. (2002). Comments on Cristina Lafont’s Interpretation of Being and Time. Inquiry, 45(2), 191–194.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. (2007). The Return of the Myth of the Mental. Inquiry, 50(4), pp. 352–365.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. (2013). Being-with-Others. In Wrathall, M., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger’s Being and Time, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 145–156.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. (2014). Skillful Coping: Essays on the Phenomenology of Everyday Perception and Action, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. (2017). Background Practices: Essays on the Understanding of Being. (Wrathall, M., Ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. (1988). Mind Over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H., & Spinosa, C. (1999). Coping with Things-in-themselves: A Practice-Based Phenomenological Argument for Realism. Inquiry, 1(42), pp. 49–78.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H., & Taylor, C. (2015). Retrieving Realism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Duff, A. S. (2015). Heidegger and Politics: The Ontology of Radical Discontent, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elden, S. (2006). Speaking Against Number: Heidegger, Language and the Politics of Calculation, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Engelland, C. (2017). Heidegger’s Shadow: Kant, Husserl, and the Transcendental Turn, Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Epstein, B. (2016). A Framework for Social Ontology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 46(2), pp. 147–167.Google Scholar

Faye, E. (2009). Heidegger: The Introduction of Nazism Into Philosophy, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Ferencz-Flatz, C. (2015). The Element of Intersubjectivity. Heidegger’s Early Conception of Empathy. Continental Philosophy Review, 48, pp. 479–496.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fried, G. (2000). Heidegger’s Polemos: From Being to Politics, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Fuchs, T., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Enactive Intersubjectivity: Participatory Sense-making and Mutual Incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8, pp. 465–486.Google Scholar

Gadamer, H.-G. (2006). Truth and Method (Weinsheimer, J., trans.), London; New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Gadamer, H.-G., & Dottori, R. (2006). A Century of Philosophy: A Conversation with Riccardo Dottori (Coltman, R. & Koepke, S., trans.), New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Gallagher, S. (2008a). Direct Perception in the Intersubjective Context. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(2), pp. 535–543.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gallagher, S. (2008b). Intersubjectivity in Perception. Continental Philosophy Review, 41, pp. 163–178.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gallagher, S., & Hutto, D. D. (2008). Understanding Others through Primary Interaction and Narrative Practice. In Zlatev, J., Racine, T. P., Sinha, C., & Itkonen, E., eds, The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity, Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 17–38.Google Scholar

Geiman, C. P. (2001). Heidegger’s Antigones. In Polt, R. & Fried, G., eds, A Companion to Heidegger’s Introduction to Metaphysics, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1986). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Gilbert, M. (1990). Walking Together: A Paradigmatic Social Phenomenon. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 15(1), pp. 1–14.Google Scholar

Gilbert, M. (1992). On Social Facts, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Gilbert, M. (1993). Agreements, Coercion, and Obligation. Ethics, 103(4), pp. 679–706.Google Scholar

Gilbert, M. (2013). Joint Commitment: How We Make the Social World, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Goldman, A. (2006). Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Golob, S. (2014). Heidegger on Concepts, Freedom and Normativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1998). Words, Thoughts, and Theories. (Rosenschein, J. S, Ed.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. M. (1992). Why the Child’s Theory of Mind Really Is a Theory. Mind & Language, 7(1–2), pp. 145–171.Google Scholar

Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. M. (2012). Reconstructing Constructivism: Causal Models, Bayesian Learning Mechanisms, and the Theory Theory. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), pp. 1085–1108.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gordon, R. M. (1995). Simulation without Introspection or Inference from Me to You. In Davies, M. & Stone, T., eds, Mental Simulation, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 53–67.Google Scholar

Grosser, F. (2013a). Mitsein: Variationen auf das Thema Gemeinschaft. In Thomä, D., Grosser, F., Meyer, K., & Schmid, H. B., eds, Heidegger-Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung, Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, pp. 304–308.Google Scholar

Grosser, F. (2013b). Zwischen Gleichschaltung und robustem Pluralismus: Volten des “Mitseins”. In Sörensen, P. & Münch, N., eds, Politische Theorie und das Denken Heideggers, Bielefeld, transcript, pp. 21–42.CrossRef Google Scholar

Guala, F. (2007). The Philosophy of Social Science: Metaphysical and Empirical. Philosophy Compass, 2(6), pp. 954–980.CrossRef Google Scholar

Guignon, C. (1983). Heidegger and the Problem of Knowledge, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Guignon, C. (2007). The History of Being. In Dreyfus, H. & Wrathall, M., eds, A Companion to Heidegger, Oxford: Blackwell., pp. 392–406.Google Scholar

Guignon, C. (2014). Authenticity and the Question of Being. In McManus, D., ed., Heidegger, Authenticity and the Self: Themes From Division Two of Being and Time, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 8–20.CrossRef Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1987). The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1989). Work and Weltanschauung: The Heidegger Controversy from a German Perspective. Critical Inquiry, 15(2), pp. 431–456.Google Scholar

Han-Pile, B. (2007). Early Heidegger’s Appropriation of Kant. In Dreyfus, H. & Wrathall, M., eds, A Companion to Heidegger, Oxford: Blackwell., pp. 80–101.Google Scholar

Haslanger, S. (2016). What Is a (Social) Structural Explanation? Philosophical Studies, 173(1), pp. 113–130.Google Scholar

Hatab, L. (2002). Heidegger and the Question of Empathy. In Raffoul, F. and Pettigrew, D., eds, Heidegger and Practical Philosophy, Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 249–270.Google Scholar

Hatab, L. J. (2000). Ethics and Finitude: Heideggerian Contributions to Moral Philosophy, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Haugeland, J. (1998). Having Thought: Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Haugeland, J. (2013). Dasein Disclosed: John Haugeland’s Heidegger. (Rouse, J., Ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Heinämaa, S. (2017). On the Complexity and Wholeness of Human Beings: Husserlian Perspectives. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 25(3), pp. 393–406.Google Scholar

Heinz, M. (2016). Seinsgeschichte und Metapolitik. In Heinz, M. & Kellerer, S., eds, Martin Heideggers “Schwarze Hefte”: eine philosophisch-politische Debatte, Berlin: Surhkamp, pp. 122–143.Google Scholar

Heller, A. (2008). The Gods of Greece: Germans and the Greeks. Thesis Eleven, 93(1), pp. 52–63.Google Scholar

Hochkeppel, W. (1983, May 6). Heidegger, die Nazis und kein Ende. Die Zeit.Google Scholar

Hodge, J. (1995). Heidegger and Ethics, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Høffding, S. (2019). A Phenomenology of Musical Absorption, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hoffman, P. (2006). Death, Time, History: Division II of Being and Time. In Guignon, C., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 222–240.Google Scholar

Husserl, E. (1960). Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology (Cairns, D., trans.), Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar

Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy (Carr, D., trans.), Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Husserl, E. (1973a). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität I. Erster Teil: 1905-1920, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRef Google Scholar

Husserl, E. (1973b). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität II. Zweiter Teil: 1921-1928, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Husserl, E. (1973c). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität III. Dritter Teil: 1929-1935, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Husserl, E. (1987). Aufsätze und Vorträge (1922–1937) (Nenon, T. & Sepp, H. R., Eds), Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Kant, I. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason (Guyer, P. & Wood, A. W., Eds), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kisiel, T. (1995). The Genesis of Heidegger’s “Being and Time,” Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Kisiel, T. (2001). Heidegger’s Philosophical Geopolitics in the Third Reich. In Polt, R. & Fried, G., eds, A Companion to Heidegger’s Introduction to Metaphysics, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 226–249.Google Scholar

Kjosavik, F., Beyer, C., & Fricke, C. (2018). Husserl’s Phenomenology of Intersubjectivity: Historical Interpretations and Contemporary Applications, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Knowles, C. (2017). Das Man and Everydayness: A New Interpretation. In Schmid, H. B. & Thonhauser, G., eds, From Conventionalism to Social Authenticity: Heidegger’s Anyone and Contemporary Social Theory, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 29–52.Google Scholar

Knudsen, N. K. (2017). Depopulation: On the Logic of Heidegger’s Volk. Research in Phenomenology, 47(3), pp. 297–330.Google Scholar

Knudsen, N. K. (2020). Heidegger and the Genesis of Social Ontology: Mitwelt, Mitsein, and the Problem of Other People. European Journal of Philosophy, 28(3), pp. 723–739.Google Scholar

Koo, J.-J. (2015). Concrete Interpersonal Encounters or Sharing a Common World: Which Is More Fundamental in Phenomenological Approaches to Sociality? In Szanto, T. & Moran, D., eds, The Phenomenology of Sociality: Discovering the ‘We,’ Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 101–114.Google Scholar

Koo, J.-J. (2016). Early Heidegger on Social Reality. In Salice, A. & Schmid, H. B., eds, The Phenomenological Approach to Social Reality: History, Concepts, Problems, New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Krueger, J., & Overgaard, S. (2012). Seeing Subjectivity: Defending a Perceptual Account of Other Minds. ProtoSociology, 47, pp. 239–262.Google Scholar

Kukla, R. (2002). The Ontology and Temporality of Conscience. Continental Philosophy Review Continental Philosophy Review, 35(1), pp. 1–34.Google Scholar

Lacoue-Labarthe, P. (1990). Heidegger, Art, and Politics: The Fiction of the Political, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lafont, C. (2000). Heidegger, Language, and World-Disclosure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lafont, C. (2002a). Précis of Heidegger, Language, and World-Disclosure. Inquiry, 45(2), pp. 185–189.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lafont, C. (2002b). Replies. Inquiry, 45(2), pp. 229–248.Google Scholar

Lafont, C. (2005). Was Heidegger an Externalist? Inquiry, 48(6), pp. 507–532.Google Scholar

Lawson, T. (2019). The Nature of Social Reality: Issues in Social Ontology, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Levinas, E. (1990). Reflections on the Philosophy of Hitlerism. Critical Inquiry, 17(1), pp. 63–71.Google Scholar

Levinas, E. (2012). Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority (Lingis, A., trans.), Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar

Levinas, E. (2016). Otherwise than Being, or, Beyond Essence (Lingis, A., trans.), Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar

Lewis, D. (2002). Convention: A Philosophical Study, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lewis, M. (2014). Heidegger and the Place of Ethics: Being-With in the Crossing of Heidegger’s Thought, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Lipps, T. (2018). The Knowledge of Other Egos. The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy, 16, pp. 261–282.Google Scholar

Løgstrup, K. E. (2020). The Ethical Demand (Stern, R. & Rabjerg, B., trans.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Löwith, K. (1969). Das Individuum in der Rolle des Mitmenschen, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar

Löwith, K. (2007). Mein Leben in Deutschland vor und nach 1933: Ein Bericht (Hausmann, F.-R., Ed.), Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler.Google Scholar

Ludwig, K. (2016). From Individual to Plural Agency: Collective Action: Volume 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Malpas, J. (1992). Donald Davidson and the Mirror of Meaning: Holism, Truth, Interpretation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Malpas, J. (2002). Gadamer, Davidson, and the Ground of Understanding. In Malpas, J., Arnswald, U., & Kertscher, J., eds, Gadamer’s Century: Essays in Honor of Hans-Georg Gadamer, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 195–216.Google Scholar

Malpas, J. (2006). Heidegger’s Topology: Being, Place, World, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Malpas, J. (2012). Heidegger and the Thinking of Place: Explorations in the Topology of Being, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Malpas, J. (2017). Place and Situation. In Malpas, J. & Gander, H.-H., eds, The Routledge Companion to Hermeneutics, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 354–366.Google Scholar

Marchart, O. (2007). Post-foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Martin, W. (2013). The Semantics of “Dasein” and the Modality of Being and Time. In Wrathall, M., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger’s Being and Time, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 100–128.Google Scholar

Mathieson, K. (2005). Collective Consciousness. In Smith, D. W. & Thomasson, A. L., eds, Phenomenology and Philosophy of Mind, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 235–252.Google Scholar

McDowell, J. (1992). Putnam on Mind and Meaning. Philosophical Topics, 20(1), pp. 35–48.Google Scholar

McDowell, J. (1994). Mind and World, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

McManus, D. (2012). Heidegger and the Measure of Truth: Themes from His Early Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

McManus, D. (2021). Constitution (Konstitution). In Wrathall, M., ed., The Cambridge Heidegger Lexicon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 184–185.Google Scholar

McMullin, I. (2013). Time and the Shared World: Heidegger on Social Relations, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

McNeill, W. (1999). The Glance of the Eye: Heidegger, Aristotle, and the Ends of Theory, Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Meijers, A. (1994). Speech Acts, Communication and Collective Intentionality: Beyond Searle’s Individualism, Utrecht: A.W.M. Meijers.Google Scholar

Mendieta, E. (2017). Metaphysical Anti-Semitism and Worldlessness: On World Poorness, World Forming, and World Destroying. In Mitchell, A. and Trawny, P., eds, Heidegger’s Black Notebooks: Responses to Anti-Semitism, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 36–51.Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Signs, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2010). Phenomenology of Perception, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Miettinen, T. (2014). Transcendental Social Ontology. In Heinämaa, Sara, Hartimo, Mirja, & Miettinen, Timo, eds, Phenomenology and the Transcendental, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 147–171.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. (1979). An Examination of Sir William Hamilton’s Philosophy (Robson, J. & Ryan, A., Eds), Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Millikan, R. G. (2005). Language: A Biological Model, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Moran, D. (2015). Dasein as Transcendence in Heidegger and the Critique of Husserl. In Georgakis, T. & Ennis, P., eds, Heidegger in the Twenty-First Century, New York: Springer, pp. 23–46.Google Scholar

Mulhall, S. (2001). Inheritance and Originality: Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Kierkegaard, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Mulhall, S. (2007). Human Mortality: Heidegger on How to Portray the Impossible Possibility of Dasein. In Dreyfus, H. & Wrathall, M., eds, A Companion to Heidegger, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 297–310.Google Scholar

Nagel, T. (1979). The Possibility of Altruism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Nancy, J.-L. (1991). The Inoperative Community, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Nancy, J.-L. (1999). The Experience of Freedom, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Nancy, J.-L. (2002). Heidegger’s “Originary Ethics.” In Raffoul, F. & Pettigrew, D., eds, Heidegger and Practical Philosophy, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Nancy, J.-L. (2008). The Being-with of Being-there. Continental Philosophy Review, 41, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar

Nancy, J.-L. (2017). The Banality of Heidegger (Fort, J., trans.), New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar

Nenon, T. (2015). Husserl and Heidegger on the Social Dimensions of the Life-World. In Učník, Ľ., Chvatík, I., & Williams, A., eds, The Phenomenological Critique of Mathematisation and the Question of Responsibility: Formalisation and the Life-World, New York: Springer International Publishing, pp. 175–184.Google Scholar

O’Brien, M. (2014). Leaping Ahead of Heidegger: Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity in Being and Time. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 22(4), pp. 534–551.Google Scholar

Okrent, M. (1991). Heidegger’s Pragmatism : Understanding, Being and the Critique of Metaphysics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Okrent, M. (2002). Equipment, World, and Language. Inquiry, 45, pp. 195–204.CrossRef Google Scholar

Okrent, M. (2020). The Truth of Being and the History of Philosophy. In Malachowski, A., ed., A Companion to Rorty, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 281–296.Google Scholar

Olafson, F. A. (1987). Heidegger and the Philosophy of Mind, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Olafson, F. A. (1994). Heidegger à la Wittgenstein or Coping with Professor Dreyfus. Inquiry, 37(1), pp. 45–64.Google Scholar

Olafson, F. A. (1998). Heidegger and the Ground of Ethics: A Study of Mitsein, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

O’Murchadha, F. (2008). Reduction, Externalism and Immanence in Husserl and Heidegger. Synthese, 160(3), pp. 375–395.Google Scholar

Overgaard, S. (2004). Husserl and Heidegger on Being in the World, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Petersson, B. (2007). Collectivity and Circularity. The Journal of Philosophy, 104(3), pp. 138–156.Google Scholar

Petropoulos, G. (2020). Actuality Without Existence: The Jewish Figure in Heidegger’s Notebooks. Critical Horizons – A Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory, 21(4), pp. 335–351.Google Scholar

Phillips, J. (2005). Heidegger’s Volk: Between National Socialism and Poetry, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Pippin, R. B. (1997). Idealism as Modernism: Hegelian Variations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pöggeler, O. (1985). Den Führer führen? Heidegger und kein Ende. Philosophische Rundschau, 32(1/2), pp. 26–67.Google Scholar

Polt, R. (2019). Time and Trauma, London ; New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar

Putnam, H. (1975). The Meaning of “Meaning.” Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 7, pp. 131–193.Google Scholar

Raffoul, F. (2007). Rethinking Selfhood: From Enowning. Research in Phenomenology, 37(1), pp. 75–94.Google Scholar

Reid, J. D. (2019). Heidegger’s Moral Ontology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Richardson, W. J. (1993). Heidegger: Through Phenomenology to Thought, New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar

Rorty, R. (1976). Overcoming the Tradition: Heidegger and Dewey. The Review of Metaphysics, 30(2), pp. 280–305.Google Scholar

Rorty, R. (1981). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Rorty, R. (1990). Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and Social Hope, New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Rousse, B. S. (2018). Self-awareness and Self-understanding. European Journal of Philosoph, 27(1), pp. 162–186.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ruin, H. (2018). Historicity and the Hermeneutic Predicament. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Phenomenology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 717–733.Google Scholar

Sánchez Guerrero, H. A. (2016). Feeling Together and Caring with One Another: A Contribution to the Debate on Collective Affective Intentionality, New York: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar

Sartre, J.-P. (2003). Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology (Barnes, H. E., trans.), Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Schatzki, T. R. (2003a). A New Societist Social Ontology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 33(2), pp. 174–202.Google Scholar

Schatzki, T. R. (2003b). The Site of the Social, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Schatzki, T. R. (2007). Early Heidegger on Sociality. In Dreyfus, H. & Wrathall, M., eds, A Companion to Heidegger, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 233–247.Google Scholar

Schear, J. (2013). Historical Finitude. In Wrathall, M., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger’s Being and Time, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 360–380.Google Scholar

Schear, J. K. (2007). Judgment and Ontology in Heidegger’s Phenomenology. New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy, 7, pp. 127–158.Google Scholar

Schear, J. K. (2021). Being (Sein): In Being and Time. In Wrathall, M., ed., The Cambridge Heidegger Lexicon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 87–93.Google Scholar

Scheffler, S. (2013). Death and the Afterlife (Kolodny, N., Ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Scheler, M. (1973). Formalism in Ethics and Non-Formal Ethics of Values: A New Attempt Toward the Foundation of an Ethical Personalism (Frings, M. S. & Funk, R. L., trans.), Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Scheler, M. (2009). The Nature of Sympathy (Heath, P., trans.), Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Schmid, H. B. (2003). Can Brains in Vats Think as a Team? Philosophical Explorations, 6(3), pp. 201–217.Google Scholar

Schmid, H. B. (2005). Wir-Intentionalitat. Kritik des ontologischen Individualismus und Rekonstruktion der Gemeinschaft, Freiburg im Breisgau: Verlag Karl Alber.Google Scholar

Schmid, H. B. (2009). Plural Action: Essays in Philosophy and Social Science, Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar

Schmid, H. B. (2014a). Plural Self-awareness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 13(1), pp. 7–24.Google Scholar

Schmid, H. B. (2014b). The Feeling of Being a Group: Corporate Emotions and Collective Consciousness. In von Scheve, C. & Salmela, M., eds, Collective Emotions: Perspectives from Psychology, Philosophy, and Sociology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–16.Google Scholar

Schmid, H. B. (2017). Authentic Role Play: A Political Solution to an Existential Paradox. In Schmid, H. B. & Thonhauser, G., eds, From Conventionalism to Social Authenticity: Heidegger’s Anyone and Contemporary Social Theory, New York: Springer, pp. 261–274.Google Scholar

Schmid, H. B. (2018). The Subject of “We Intend.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 17(2), pp. 231–243.Google Scholar

Schmidt, D. J. (2001). On Germans & Other Greeks: Tragedy and Ethical Life, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Schmitt, C. (2006). Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty (Strong, T. B., trans., Schwab, G., Ed.), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Scholl, B. J., & Leslie, A. M. (1999). Modularity, Development and “Theory of Mind.” Mind and Language, 14(1), pp. 131–153.Google Scholar

Schütz, A. (1967). The Phenomenology of the Social World (Walsh, G. & Lehnert, F., trans.), Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Schweikard, D. P., & Schmid, H. B. (2013). Collective Intentionality. In Zalta, E., ed., Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/collective-intentionality/, accessed on 3/3/2020Google Scholar

Searle, J. (1990). Collective Intentions and Actions. In Jerry Morgan, P. R. C & Pollack, M., eds, Intentions in Communication, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 401–415.Google Scholar

Searle, J. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Searle, J. (2001). Neither Phenomenological Description Nor Rational Reconstruction. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 55(216), pp. 277–284.Google Scholar

Searle, J. (2010). Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sheehan, T. (2001). A Paradigm Shift in Heidegger Research. Continental Philosophy Review, 34(2), pp. 183–202.Google Scholar

Sheehan, T. (2014). No One Can Jump Over His Own Shadow: Richard Polt and Gregory Fried in Conversation with Thomas Sheehan. Retrieved September 19, 2021, from www.3ammagazine.com/3am/no-one-can-jump-over-his-own-shadow/Google Scholar

Sheehan, T. (2015). Making Sense of Heidegger: A Paradigm Shift, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Sherover, C. M. (1981). Founding an Existential Ethic. Human Studies, 4(3), pp. 223–236.Google Scholar

Shoemaker, D. (2011). Attributability, Answerability, and Accountability: Toward a Wider Theory of Moral Responsibility. Ethics, 121(3), pp. 602–632.Google Scholar

Sikka, S. (2018). Heidegger, Morality and Politics: Questioning the Shepherd of Being, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stein, E. (1970). On the Problem of Empathy (W. Stein, trans.), The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Steinbock, A. J. (1995). Home and Beyond: Generative Phenomenology after Husserl, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Stroh, K. M. (2015). Intersubjectivity of Dasein in Heideggers Being and Time: How Authenticity is a Return to Community. Human Studies: A Journal for Philosophy and the Social Sciences, 38(2), pp. 243–259.Google Scholar

Stueber, K. (2006). Rediscovering Empathy: Agency, Folk Psychology, and the Human Sciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. (2002). Understanding the Other: A Gadamerian View on Conceptual Schemes. In Malpas, J., Arnswald, U., & Kertscher, J., eds, Gadamer’s Century: Essays in Honor of Hans-Georg Gadamer, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Theunissen, M. (1984). The Other: Studies in the Social Ontology of Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, and Buber (Macann, C., trans.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Thompson, K. (2017). The Historicality of Das Man: Foucault on Docility and Optimality. In Bernhard, S. H. & Gerhard, T., eds, From Conventionalism to Social Authenticity: Heidegger’s Anyone and Contemporary Social Theory, New York: Springer, pp. 101–114.Google Scholar

Thomson, I. (2000). Ontotheology? Understanding Heidegger’s Destruktion of Metaphysics. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 8(3), pp. 297–327.Google Scholar

Thomson, I. (2013). Death and Demise in Being and Time. In Wrathall, M., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger’s Being and Time, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 260–290.Google Scholar

Thonhauser, G. (2017). Transforming the World: A Butlerian Reading of Heidegger on Social Change? In Schmid, H. B. & Thonhauser, G., eds, From Conventionalism to Social Authenticity: Heidegger’s Anyone and Contemporary Social Theory, New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Tollefsen, D. P. (2017). Collective Intentionality and Methodology in the Social Sciences. In Jankovic, M. and Ludwig, K., eds, The Routledge Handbook of Collective Intentionality, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 389–402.Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. (2014). A Natural History of Human Thinking, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Tönnies, F. (2001). Tönnies: Community and Civil Society (Hollis, M., trans., Harris, J., Ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Trawny, P. (2014). Heidegger und der Mythos der jüdischen Weltverschwörung, Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar

Tugendhat, E. (2001). Aufsätze 1992–2000, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Tuomela, R. (2013). Social Ontology: Collective Intentionality and Group Agents, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tuomela, R., Hakli, R., & Mäkelä, P. (2020). Social Ontology in the Making: An Introduction. In Tuomela, R., Hakli, R., & Mäkelä, P., eds, Social Ontology in the Making, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar

van Buren, J. (1994). The Young Heidegger: Rumor of the Hidden King, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Varga, S. (2020). Toward a Perceptual Account of Mindreading. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 100(2), pp. 380–401.Google Scholar

Vattimo, G. (1988). The End of Modernity: Nihilism and Hermeneutics in Post-modern Culture, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Vattimo, G. (1997). Beyond Interpretation: The Meaning of Hermeneutics for Philosophy, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Vogel, L. (1994). The Fragile We: Ethical Implications Of Heidegger’s Being and Time, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

von Herrmann, F.-W., & Alfieri, F. (2017). Martin Heidegger: Die Wahrheit über die Schwarzen Hefte, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar

Walsh, P. (2019). Intercorporeity and the First-person Plural in Merleau-Ponty. Continental Philosophy Review, 53, pp. 21–47.Google Scholar

Ward, K. (2021). Responsible for Destiny: Historizing, Historicality, and Community. Gatherings: The Heidegger Circle Annual, 11, pp. 198–226.Google Scholar

Watson, G. (1996). Two Faces of Responsibility. Philosophical Topics, 24(2), pp. 227–248.Google Scholar

Webb, D. (2011). Heidegger, Ethics and the Practice of Ontology, London, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Weber, M. (2019). Economy and Society: A New Translation (Tribe, K., trans.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Weichold, M. (2017). Social Authenticity: Towards a Heideggerian Analysis of Social Change. In Schmid, H. B. & Thonhauser, G., eds, From Conventionalism to Social Authenticity: Heidegger’s Anyone and Contemporary Social Theory, New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Westerlund, F. (2020). Heidegger and the Problem of Phenomena, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Winch, P. (1999). Understanding a Primitive Society. In Frankenberry, N. K. & Penner, H. H., eds, Language, Truth, and Religious Belief: Studies in Twentieth-Century Theory and Method in Religion, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 342–377.Google Scholar

Withy, K. (2013). The Strategic Unity of Heidegger’s The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 51(2), pp. 161–178.Google Scholar

Withy, K. (2015). Heidegger on Being Uncanny, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Withy, K. (2020). We Are a Conversation: Heidegger on How Language Uncovers. In Engelland, C., ed., Language and Phenomenology, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 132–148.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1967). Philosophical Investigations (Anscombe, G. E. M., trans.), Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wolin, R. (Ed.). (1992). The Heidegger Controversy: A Critical Reader, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Wolin, R. (2016). The Politics of Being: The Political Thought of Martin Heidegger, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Wrathall, M. (1999). Practical Incommensurability and the Phenomenological Basis of Robust Realism. Inquiry, 42(1), pp. 79–88.Google Scholar

Wrathall, M. (2002). Heidegger, Truth, and Reference. Inquiry, 45(2), pp. 217–228.Google Scholar

Wrathall, M. (2011). Heidegger and Unconcealment: Truth, Language, and History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wrathall, M. (2014). Autonomy, Authenticity, and the Self. In McManus, D., ed., Heidegger, Authenticity and the Self: Themes from Division Two of Being and Time, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 193–214.Google Scholar

Wrathall, M. (2015). “Demanding Authenticity of Ourselves”: Heidegger on Authenticity as an Extra-Moral Ideal. In Pedersen, H. & Altman, M., eds, Horizons of Authenticity in Phenomenology, Existentialism, and Moral Psychology: Essays in Honor of Charles Guignon, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 347–368.Google Scholar

Wrathall, M. (2017). “I” “here” and “you” “there”. Yearbook for Eastern and Western Philosophy, 2017(2), pp. 223–234.Google Scholar

Wrathall, M. (2018). The Task of Thinking in a Technological Age. In Wendland, A. J., Merwin, C., & Hadjioannou, C., eds, Heidegger on Technology, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 13–38.Google Scholar

Young, . (2008). Heidegger, Philosophy, Nazism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Zahavi, D. (2001). Husserl and Transcendental Intersubjectivity: A Response to the Linguistic-Pragmatic Critique, Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar

Zahavi, D. (2008). Internalism, Externalism, and Transcendental Idealism. Synthese, 160(3), 355–374.Google Scholar

Zahavi, D. (2010). Empathy, Embodiment and Interpersonal Understanding: From Lipps to Schutz. Inquiry, 53(3), pp. 285–306.Google Scholar

Zahavi, D. (2014). Self and Other: Exploring Subjectivity, Empathy, and Shame, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Zahavi, D. (2015a). Self and Other: From Pure Ego to Co-constituted We. Continental Philosophy Review, 48(2), pp. 143–160.Google Scholar

Zahavi, D. (2015b). You, Me, and We: The Sharing of Emotional Experiences. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 22(1–2), pp. 84–101.Google Scholar

Zahavi, D. (2018). Collective Intentionality and Plural Pre-Reflective Self-Awareness. Journal of Social Philosophy, 49(1), pp. 61–75.Google Scholar

Zahavi, D. (2019). Second-Person Engagement, Self-Alienation, and Group-Identification. Topoi, 38(1), pp. 251–260.Google Scholar

Zahavi, D., & Rochat, P. (2015). Empathy≠sharing: Perspectives from Phenomenology and Developmental Psychology. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, pp. 543–553.Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive