Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:06:22.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2023

Nicolai K. Knudsen
Nicolai K. Knudsen
Affiliation:
Aarhus Universitet, Denmark
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Heidegger's Social Ontology
The Phenomenology of Self, World, and Others
 , pp. 260 - 273
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agosta, L. (2010). Empathy in the Context of Philosophy, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1971, 21 October). Martin Heidegger at Eighty (A. Hofstadter, trans.), New York Review of Books. www.nybooks.com/articles/1971/10/21/martin-heidegger-at-eighty/ [Accessed 2020-11-09].Google Scholar
Bambach, C. R. (2003). Heidegger’s Roots: Nietzsche, National Socialism and the Greeks, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (1997). Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Beinsteiner, A. (2017). Unobtrusive Governance: Heidegger and Foucault on the Sources of Social Normativity. In Schmid, H. B. & Thonhauser, G., eds, From Conventionalism to Social Authenticity: Heidegger’s Anyone and Contemporary Social Theory, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 79–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Beistegui, M. (1998). Heidegger and the Political: Dystopias, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bergo, B. (2017). ‘Sterben Sie?’ The Problem of Dasein and ‘Animals’ … of Various Kinds. In Mitchell, A. J. & Trawny, P., eds, Heidegger’s Black Notebooks, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 52–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blattner, W. (1994). The Concept of Death in Being and Time. Man and World, 27(1), 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blattner, W. (1999). Heidegger’s Temporal Idealism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blattner, W. (2005). Temporality. In Dreyfus, H. & Wrathall, M., eds, A Companion to Heidegger, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 311–324.Google Scholar
Blattner, W. (2013). Authenticity and Resoluteness. In Wrathall, M., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger’s Being and Time, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 320–337.Google Scholar
Boedeker, E. C. (2001). Individual and Community in Early Heidegger: Situating das Man, the Man-Self, and Self-Ownership in Dasein’s Ontological Structure. Inquiry, 44(1), 63–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1992). Back to History: An Interview. In Wolin, R., ed., The Heidegger Controversy: A Critical Reader, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 264–271.Google Scholar
Bratman, M. (1999). Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and Agency, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, M. (2013). Shared Agency: A Planning Theory of Acting Together, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buber, M. (2002). Between Man and Man (Smith, R. G., trans.), Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Caputo, J. D. (1987). Radical Hermeneutics: Repetition, Deconstruction, and the Hermeneutic Project, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Carman, T. (1994). On Being Social: A Reply to Olafson. Inquiry, 37(2), pp. 203–223.Google Scholar
Carman, T. (2000). Must We Be Inauthentic? In Wrathall, M. & Malpas, J., eds, Heidegger, Authenticity, and Modernity, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 13–28.Google Scholar
Carman, T. (2002). Was Heidegger a Linguistic Idealist? Inquiry, 45, pp. 205–216.Google Scholar
Carman, T. (2005). Authenticity. In Dreyfus, H. & Wrathall, M., eds, A Companion to Heidegger, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 285–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carman, T. (2007). Heidegger’s Analytic: Interpretation, Discourse and Authenticity in Being and Time, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carman, T. (2014). Things Fall Apart: Heidegger on the Constancy and Finality of Death. In McManus, D., ed., Heidegger, Authenticity and the Self: Themes from Division Two of Being and Time, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, D. (1991). Time, Narrative, and History, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Carruthers, P. (2012). Mindreading in Infancy. Mind & Language, 28(2), pp. 141–172.Google Scholar
Crowell, S. G. (2001). Husserl, Heidegger, and the Space of Meaning: Paths toward Transcendental Phenomenology, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Crowell, S. G. (2003). Facticity and Transcendental Philosophy. In Malpas, J., ed., From Kant to Davidson: Philosophy and the Idea of the Transcendental, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 100–121.Google Scholar
Crowell, S. G. (2012). Authentic Historicality. In Carr, D. & Cheung, C.-F., eds, Space, Time and Culture, Dordrecht: Springer Science and Business Media, pp. 57–72.Google Scholar
Crowell, S. G. (2013). Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crowell, S. G., & Malpas, J. (2007). Transcendental Heidegger, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cykowski, E. (2021). Heidegger’s Metaphysical Abyss: Between the Human and the Animal, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlstrom, D. (2005). Heidegger’s Transcendentalism. Research in Phenomenology, 35(1), pp. 29–54.Google Scholar
Darwall, S. (2011). Being With. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 49, pp. 4–24.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (2001). Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective: Philosophical Essays, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory Sense-Making: An Enactive Approach to Social Cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6, pp. 485–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E., & Gallagher, S. (2010). Can Social Interaction Constitute Social Cognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(10), pp. 441–447.Google Scholar
De Jaegher, H., & Froese, T. (2009). On the Role of Social Interaction in Individual Agency. Adaptive Behavior, 17(5), pp. 444–460.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. (1989). Of Spirit: Heidegger and the Question, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Di Cesare, D. (2014). Heidegger e gli ebrei: i ‘Quaderni neri’, Milan: Bollati Boringhieri.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. (1991). Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. (1995). Interpreting Heidegger on Das Man. Inquiry, 38(4), pp. 423–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, H. (2002). Comments on Cristina Lafont’s Interpretation of Being and Time. Inquiry, 45(2), 191–194.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. (2007). The Return of the Myth of the Mental. Inquiry, 50(4), pp. 352–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, H. (2013). Being-with-Others. In Wrathall, M., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger’s Being and Time, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 145–156.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. (2014). Skillful Coping: Essays on the Phenomenology of Everyday Perception and Action, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, H. (2017). Background Practices: Essays on the Understanding of Being. (Wrathall, M., Ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. (1988). Mind Over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H., & Spinosa, C. (1999). Coping with Things-in-themselves: A Practice-Based Phenomenological Argument for Realism. Inquiry, 1(42), pp. 49–78.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H., & Taylor, C. (2015). Retrieving Realism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Duff, A. S. (2015). Heidegger and Politics: The Ontology of Radical Discontent, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elden, S. (2006). Speaking Against Number: Heidegger, Language and the Politics of Calculation, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Engelland, C. (2017). Heidegger’s Shadow: Kant, Husserl, and the Transcendental Turn, Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, B. (2016). A Framework for Social Ontology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 46(2), pp. 147–167.Google Scholar
Faye, E. (2009). Heidegger: The Introduction of Nazism Into Philosophy, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ferencz-Flatz, C. (2015). The Element of Intersubjectivity. Heidegger’s Early Conception of Empathy. Continental Philosophy Review, 48, pp. 479–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, G. (2000). Heidegger’s Polemos: From Being to Politics, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fuchs, T., & De Jaegher, H. (2009). Enactive Intersubjectivity: Participatory Sense-making and Mutual Incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8, pp. 465–486.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (2006). Truth and Method (Weinsheimer, J., trans.), London; New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G., & Dottori, R. (2006). A Century of Philosophy: A Conversation with Riccardo Dottori (Coltman, R. & Koepke, S., trans.), New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. (2008a). Direct Perception in the Intersubjective Context. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(2), pp. 535–543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallagher, S. (2008b). Intersubjectivity in Perception. Continental Philosophy Review, 41, pp. 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, S., & Hutto, D. D. (2008). Understanding Others through Primary Interaction and Narrative Practice. In Zlatev, J., Racine, T. P., Sinha, C., & Itkonen, E., eds, The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity, Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 17–38.Google Scholar
Geiman, C. P. (2001). Heidegger’s Antigones. In Polt, R. & Fried, G., eds, A Companion to Heidegger’s Introduction to Metaphysics, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1986). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, M. (1990). Walking Together: A Paradigmatic Social Phenomenon. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 15(1), pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Gilbert, M. (1992). On Social Facts, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, M. (1993). Agreements, Coercion, and Obligation. Ethics, 103(4), pp. 679–706.Google Scholar
Gilbert, M. (2013). Joint Commitment: How We Make the Social World, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. (2006). Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Golob, S. (2014). Heidegger on Concepts, Freedom and Normativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (1998). Words, Thoughts, and Theories. (Rosenschein, J. S, Ed.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. M. (1992). Why the Child’s Theory of Mind Really Is a Theory. Mind & Language, 7(1–2), pp. 145–171.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. M. (2012). Reconstructing Constructivism: Causal Models, Bayesian Learning Mechanisms, and the Theory Theory. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), pp. 1085–1108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, R. M. (1995). Simulation without Introspection or Inference from Me to You. In Davies, M. & Stone, T., eds, Mental Simulation, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 53–67.Google Scholar
Grosser, F. (2013a). Mitsein: Variationen auf das Thema Gemeinschaft. In Thomä, D., Grosser, F., Meyer, K., & Schmid, H. B., eds, Heidegger-Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung, Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, pp. 304–308.Google Scholar
Grosser, F. (2013b). Zwischen Gleichschaltung und robustem Pluralismus: Volten des “Mitseins”. In Sörensen, P. & Münch, N., eds, Politische Theorie und das Denken Heideggers, Bielefeld, transcript, pp. 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guala, F. (2007). The Philosophy of Social Science: Metaphysical and Empirical. Philosophy Compass, 2(6), pp. 954–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guignon, C. (1983). Heidegger and the Problem of Knowledge, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Guignon, C. (2007). The History of Being. In Dreyfus, H. & Wrathall, M., eds, A Companion to Heidegger, Oxford: Blackwell., pp. 392–406.Google Scholar
Guignon, C. (2014). Authenticity and the Question of Being. In McManus, D., ed., Heidegger, Authenticity and the Self: Themes From Division Two of Being and Time, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 8–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. (1987). The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1989). Work and Weltanschauung: The Heidegger Controversy from a German Perspective. Critical Inquiry, 15(2), pp. 431–456.Google Scholar
Han-Pile, B. (2007). Early Heidegger’s Appropriation of Kant. In Dreyfus, H. & Wrathall, M., eds, A Companion to Heidegger, Oxford: Blackwell., pp. 80–101.Google Scholar
Haslanger, S. (2016). What Is a (Social) Structural Explanation? Philosophical Studies, 173(1), pp. 113–130.Google Scholar
Hatab, L. (2002). Heidegger and the Question of Empathy. In Raffoul, F. and Pettigrew, D., eds, Heidegger and Practical Philosophy, Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 249–270.Google Scholar
Hatab, L. J. (2000). Ethics and Finitude: Heideggerian Contributions to Moral Philosophy, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Haugeland, J. (1998). Having Thought: Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haugeland, J. (2013). Dasein Disclosed: John Haugeland’s Heidegger. (Rouse, J., Ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heinämaa, S. (2017). On the Complexity and Wholeness of Human Beings: Husserlian Perspectives. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 25(3), pp. 393–406.Google Scholar
Heinz, M. (2016). Seinsgeschichte und Metapolitik. In Heinz, M. & Kellerer, S., eds, Martin Heideggers “Schwarze Hefte”: eine philosophisch-politische Debatte, Berlin: Surhkamp, pp. 122–143.Google Scholar
Heller, A. (2008). The Gods of Greece: Germans and the Greeks. Thesis Eleven, 93(1), pp. 52–63.Google Scholar
Hochkeppel, W. (1983, May 6). Heidegger, die Nazis und kein Ende. Die Zeit.Google Scholar
Hodge, J. (1995). Heidegger and Ethics, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Høffding, S. (2019). A Phenomenology of Musical Absorption, London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hoffman, P. (2006). Death, Time, History: Division II of Being and Time. In Guignon, C., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 222–240.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1960). Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology (Cairns, D., trans.), Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy (Carr, D., trans.), Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1973a). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität I. Erster Teil: 1905-1920, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, E. (1973b). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität II. Zweiter Teil: 1921-1928, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1973c). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität III. Dritter Teil: 1929-1935, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1987). Aufsätze und Vorträge (1922–1937) (Nenon, T. & Sepp, H. R., Eds), Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason (Guyer, P. & Wood, A. W., Eds), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kisiel, T. (1995). The Genesis of Heidegger’s “Being and Time,” Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kisiel, T. (2001). Heidegger’s Philosophical Geopolitics in the Third Reich. In Polt, R. & Fried, G., eds, A Companion to Heidegger’s Introduction to Metaphysics, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 226–249.Google Scholar
Kjosavik, F., Beyer, C., & Fricke, C. (2018). Husserl’s Phenomenology of Intersubjectivity: Historical Interpretations and Contemporary Applications, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Knowles, C. (2017). Das Man and Everydayness: A New Interpretation. In Schmid, H. B. & Thonhauser, G., eds, From Conventionalism to Social Authenticity: Heidegger’s Anyone and Contemporary Social Theory, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 29–52.Google Scholar
Knudsen, N. K. (2017). Depopulation: On the Logic of Heidegger’s Volk. Research in Phenomenology, 47(3), pp. 297–330.Google Scholar
Knudsen, N. K. (2020). Heidegger and the Genesis of Social Ontology: Mitwelt, Mitsein, and the Problem of Other People. European Journal of Philosophy, 28(3), pp. 723–739.Google Scholar
Koo, J.-J. (2015). Concrete Interpersonal Encounters or Sharing a Common World: Which Is More Fundamental in Phenomenological Approaches to Sociality? In Szanto, T. & Moran, D., eds, The Phenomenology of Sociality: Discovering the ‘We,’ Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 101–114.Google Scholar
Koo, J.-J. (2016). Early Heidegger on Social Reality. In Salice, A. & Schmid, H. B., eds, The Phenomenological Approach to Social Reality: History, Concepts, Problems, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Krueger, J., & Overgaard, S. (2012). Seeing Subjectivity: Defending a Perceptual Account of Other Minds. ProtoSociology, 47, pp. 239–262.Google Scholar
Kukla, R. (2002). The Ontology and Temporality of Conscience. Continental Philosophy Review Continental Philosophy Review, 35(1), pp. 1–34.Google Scholar
Lacoue-Labarthe, P. (1990). Heidegger, Art, and Politics: The Fiction of the Political, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lafont, C. (2000). Heidegger, Language, and World-Disclosure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lafont, C. (2002a). Précis of Heidegger, Language, and World-Disclosure. Inquiry, 45(2), pp. 185–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafont, C. (2002b). Replies. Inquiry, 45(2), pp. 229–248.Google Scholar
Lafont, C. (2005). Was Heidegger an Externalist? Inquiry, 48(6), pp. 507–532.Google Scholar
Lawson, T. (2019). The Nature of Social Reality: Issues in Social Ontology, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Levinas, E. (1990). Reflections on the Philosophy of Hitlerism. Critical Inquiry, 17(1), pp. 63–71.Google Scholar
Levinas, E. (2012). Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority (Lingis, A., trans.), Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Levinas, E. (2016). Otherwise than Being, or, Beyond Essence (Lingis, A., trans.), Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (2002). Convention: A Philosophical Study, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. (2014). Heidegger and the Place of Ethics: Being-With in the Crossing of Heidegger’s Thought, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Lipps, T. (2018). The Knowledge of Other Egos. The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy, 16, pp. 261–282.Google Scholar
Løgstrup, K. E. (2020). The Ethical Demand (Stern, R. & Rabjerg, B., trans.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Löwith, K. (1969). Das Individuum in der Rolle des Mitmenschen, Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Löwith, K. (2007). Mein Leben in Deutschland vor und nach 1933: Ein Bericht (Hausmann, F.-R., Ed.), Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler.Google Scholar
Ludwig, K. (2016). From Individual to Plural Agency: Collective Action: Volume 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malpas, J. (1992). Donald Davidson and the Mirror of Meaning: Holism, Truth, Interpretation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Malpas, J. (2002). Gadamer, Davidson, and the Ground of Understanding. In Malpas, J., Arnswald, U., & Kertscher, J., eds, Gadamer’s Century: Essays in Honor of Hans-Georg Gadamer, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 195–216.Google Scholar
Malpas, J. (2006). Heidegger’s Topology: Being, Place, World, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Malpas, J. (2012). Heidegger and the Thinking of Place: Explorations in the Topology of Being, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Malpas, J. (2017). Place and Situation. In Malpas, J. & Gander, H.-H., eds, The Routledge Companion to Hermeneutics, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 354–366.Google Scholar
Marchart, O. (2007). Post-foundational Political Thought: Political Difference in Nancy, Lefort, Badiou and Laclau, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, W. (2013). The Semantics of “Dasein” and the Modality of Being and Time. In Wrathall, M., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger’s Being and Time, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 100–128.Google Scholar
Mathieson, K. (2005). Collective Consciousness. In Smith, D. W. & Thomasson, A. L., eds, Phenomenology and Philosophy of Mind, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 235–252.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (1992). Putnam on Mind and Meaning. Philosophical Topics, 20(1), pp. 35–48.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (1994). Mind and World, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McManus, D. (2012). Heidegger and the Measure of Truth: Themes from His Early Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McManus, D. (2021). Constitution (Konstitution). In Wrathall, M., ed., The Cambridge Heidegger Lexicon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 184–185.Google Scholar
McMullin, I. (2013). Time and the Shared World: Heidegger on Social Relations, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
McNeill, W. (1999). The Glance of the Eye: Heidegger, Aristotle, and the Ends of Theory, Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Meijers, A. (1994). Speech Acts, Communication and Collective Intentionality: Beyond Searle’s Individualism, Utrecht: A.W.M. Meijers.Google Scholar
Mendieta, E. (2017). Metaphysical Anti-Semitism and Worldlessness: On World Poorness, World Forming, and World Destroying. In Mitchell, A. and Trawny, P., eds, Heidegger’s Black Notebooks: Responses to Anti-Semitism, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 36–51.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Signs, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2010). Phenomenology of Perception, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Miettinen, T. (2014). Transcendental Social Ontology. In Heinämaa, Sara, Hartimo, Mirja, & Miettinen, Timo, eds, Phenomenology and the Transcendental, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 147–171.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1979). An Examination of Sir William Hamilton’s Philosophy (Robson, J. & Ryan, A., Eds), Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Millikan, R. G. (2005). Language: A Biological Model, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moran, D. (2015). Dasein as Transcendence in Heidegger and the Critique of Husserl. In Georgakis, T. & Ennis, P., eds, Heidegger in the Twenty-First Century, New York: Springer, pp. 23–46.Google Scholar
Mulhall, S. (2001). Inheritance and Originality: Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Kierkegaard, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mulhall, S. (2007). Human Mortality: Heidegger on How to Portray the Impossible Possibility of Dasein. In Dreyfus, H. & Wrathall, M., eds, A Companion to Heidegger, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 297–310.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (1979). The Possibility of Altruism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nancy, J.-L. (1991). The Inoperative Community, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Nancy, J.-L. (1999). The Experience of Freedom, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Nancy, J.-L. (2002). Heidegger’s “Originary Ethics.” In Raffoul, F. & Pettigrew, D., eds, Heidegger and Practical Philosophy, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Nancy, J.-L. (2008). The Being-with of Being-there. Continental Philosophy Review, 41, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Nancy, J.-L. (2017). The Banality of Heidegger (Fort, J., trans.), New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Nenon, T. (2015). Husserl and Heidegger on the Social Dimensions of the Life-World. In Učník, Ľ., Chvatík, I., & Williams, A., eds, The Phenomenological Critique of Mathematisation and the Question of Responsibility: Formalisation and the Life-World, New York: Springer International Publishing, pp. 175–184.Google Scholar
O’Brien, M. (2014). Leaping Ahead of Heidegger: Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity in Being and Time. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 22(4), pp. 534–551.Google Scholar
Okrent, M. (1991). Heidegger’s Pragmatism : Understanding, Being and the Critique of Metaphysics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Okrent, M. (2002). Equipment, World, and Language. Inquiry, 45, pp. 195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okrent, M. (2020). The Truth of Being and the History of Philosophy. In Malachowski, A., ed., A Companion to Rorty, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 281–296.Google Scholar
Olafson, F. A. (1987). Heidegger and the Philosophy of Mind, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olafson, F. A. (1994). Heidegger à la Wittgenstein or Coping with Professor Dreyfus. Inquiry, 37(1), pp. 45–64.Google Scholar
Olafson, F. A. (1998). Heidegger and the Ground of Ethics: A Study of Mitsein, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Murchadha, F. (2008). Reduction, Externalism and Immanence in Husserl and Heidegger. Synthese, 160(3), pp. 375–395.Google Scholar
Overgaard, S. (2004). Husserl and Heidegger on Being in the World, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Petersson, B. (2007). Collectivity and Circularity. The Journal of Philosophy, 104(3), pp. 138–156.Google Scholar
Petropoulos, G. (2020). Actuality Without Existence: The Jewish Figure in Heidegger’s Notebooks. Critical Horizons – A Journal of Philosophy and Social Theory, 21(4), pp. 335–351.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. (2005). Heidegger’s Volk: Between National Socialism and Poetry, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. B. (1997). Idealism as Modernism: Hegelian Variations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pöggeler, O. (1985). Den Führer führen? Heidegger und kein Ende. Philosophische Rundschau, 32(1/2), pp. 26–67.Google Scholar
Polt, R. (2019). Time and Trauma, London ; New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1975). The Meaning of “Meaning.” Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 7, pp. 131–193.Google Scholar
Raffoul, F. (2007). Rethinking Selfhood: From Enowning. Research in Phenomenology, 37(1), pp. 75–94.Google Scholar
Reid, J. D. (2019). Heidegger’s Moral Ontology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, W. J. (1993). Heidegger: Through Phenomenology to Thought, New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1976). Overcoming the Tradition: Heidegger and Dewey. The Review of Metaphysics, 30(2), pp. 280–305.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1981). Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1990). Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1999). Philosophy and Social Hope, New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rousse, B. S. (2018). Self-awareness and Self-understanding. European Journal of Philosoph, 27(1), pp. 162–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruin, H. (2018). Historicity and the Hermeneutic Predicament. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Phenomenology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 717–733.Google Scholar
Sánchez Guerrero, H. A. (2016). Feeling Together and Caring with One Another: A Contribution to the Debate on Collective Affective Intentionality, New York: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Sartre, J.-P. (2003). Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology (Barnes, H. E., trans.), Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schatzki, T. R. (2003a). A New Societist Social Ontology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 33(2), pp. 174–202.Google Scholar
Schatzki, T. R. (2003b). The Site of the Social, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Schatzki, T. R. (2007). Early Heidegger on Sociality. In Dreyfus, H. & Wrathall, M., eds, A Companion to Heidegger, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 233–247.Google Scholar
Schear, J. (2013). Historical Finitude. In Wrathall, M., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger’s Being and Time, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 360–380.Google Scholar
Schear, J. K. (2007). Judgment and Ontology in Heidegger’s Phenomenology. New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy, 7, pp. 127–158.Google Scholar
Schear, J. K. (2021). Being (Sein): In Being and Time. In Wrathall, M., ed., The Cambridge Heidegger Lexicon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 87–93.Google Scholar
Scheffler, S. (2013). Death and the Afterlife (Kolodny, N., Ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scheler, M. (1973). Formalism in Ethics and Non-Formal Ethics of Values: A New Attempt Toward the Foundation of an Ethical Personalism (Frings, M. S. & Funk, R. L., trans.), Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Scheler, M. (2009). The Nature of Sympathy (Heath, P., trans.), Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Schmid, H. B. (2003). Can Brains in Vats Think as a Team? Philosophical Explorations, 6(3), pp. 201–217.Google Scholar
Schmid, H. B. (2005). Wir-Intentionalitat. Kritik des ontologischen Individualismus und Rekonstruktion der Gemeinschaft, Freiburg im Breisgau: Verlag Karl Alber.Google Scholar
Schmid, H. B. (2009). Plural Action: Essays in Philosophy and Social Science, Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Schmid, H. B. (2014a). Plural Self-awareness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 13(1), pp. 7–24.Google Scholar
Schmid, H. B. (2014b). The Feeling of Being a Group: Corporate Emotions and Collective Consciousness. In von Scheve, C. & Salmela, M., eds, Collective Emotions: Perspectives from Psychology, Philosophy, and Sociology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–16.Google Scholar
Schmid, H. B. (2017). Authentic Role Play: A Political Solution to an Existential Paradox. In Schmid, H. B. & Thonhauser, G., eds, From Conventionalism to Social Authenticity: Heidegger’s Anyone and Contemporary Social Theory, New York: Springer, pp. 261–274.Google Scholar
Schmid, H. B. (2018). The Subject of “We Intend.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 17(2), pp. 231–243.Google Scholar
Schmidt, D. J. (2001). On Germans & Other Greeks: Tragedy and Ethical Life, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (2006). Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty (Strong, T. B., trans., Schwab, G., Ed.), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Scholl, B. J., & Leslie, A. M. (1999). Modularity, Development and “Theory of Mind.” Mind and Language, 14(1), pp. 131–153.Google Scholar
Schütz, A. (1967). The Phenomenology of the Social World (Walsh, G. & Lehnert, F., trans.), Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Schweikard, D. P., & Schmid, H. B. (2013). Collective Intentionality. In Zalta, E., ed., Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/collective-intentionality/, accessed on 3/3/2020Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1990). Collective Intentions and Actions. In Jerry Morgan, P. R. C & Pollack, M., eds, Intentions in Communication, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 401–415.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (2001). Neither Phenomenological Description Nor Rational Reconstruction. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 55(216), pp. 277–284.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (2010). Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sheehan, T. (2001). A Paradigm Shift in Heidegger Research. Continental Philosophy Review, 34(2), pp. 183–202.Google Scholar
Sheehan, T. (2014). No One Can Jump Over His Own Shadow: Richard Polt and Gregory Fried in Conversation with Thomas Sheehan. Retrieved September 19, 2021, from www.3ammagazine.com/3am/no-one-can-jump-over-his-own-shadow/Google Scholar
Sheehan, T. (2015). Making Sense of Heidegger: A Paradigm Shift, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Sherover, C. M. (1981). Founding an Existential Ethic. Human Studies, 4(3), pp. 223–236.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, D. (2011). Attributability, Answerability, and Accountability: Toward a Wider Theory of Moral Responsibility. Ethics, 121(3), pp. 602–632.Google Scholar
Sikka, S. (2018). Heidegger, Morality and Politics: Questioning the Shepherd of Being, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stein, E. (1970). On the Problem of Empathy (W. Stein, trans.), The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Steinbock, A. J. (1995). Home and Beyond: Generative Phenomenology after Husserl, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Stroh, K. M. (2015). Intersubjectivity of Dasein in Heideggers Being and Time: How Authenticity is a Return to Community. Human Studies: A Journal for Philosophy and the Social Sciences, 38(2), pp. 243–259.Google Scholar
Stueber, K. (2006). Rediscovering Empathy: Agency, Folk Psychology, and the Human Sciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (2002). Understanding the Other: A Gadamerian View on Conceptual Schemes. In Malpas, J., Arnswald, U., & Kertscher, J., eds, Gadamer’s Century: Essays in Honor of Hans-Georg Gadamer, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Theunissen, M. (1984). The Other: Studies in the Social Ontology of Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, and Buber (Macann, C., trans.), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, K. (2017). The Historicality of Das Man: Foucault on Docility and Optimality. In Bernhard, S. H. & Gerhard, T., eds, From Conventionalism to Social Authenticity: Heidegger’s Anyone and Contemporary Social Theory, New York: Springer, pp. 101–114.Google Scholar
Thomson, I. (2000). Ontotheology? Understanding Heidegger’s Destruktion of Metaphysics. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 8(3), pp. 297–327.Google Scholar
Thomson, I. (2013). Death and Demise in Being and Time. In Wrathall, M., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger’s Being and Time, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 260–290.Google Scholar
Thonhauser, G. (2017). Transforming the World: A Butlerian Reading of Heidegger on Social Change? In Schmid, H. B. & Thonhauser, G., eds, From Conventionalism to Social Authenticity: Heidegger’s Anyone and Contemporary Social Theory, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Tollefsen, D. P. (2017). Collective Intentionality and Methodology in the Social Sciences. In Jankovic, M. and Ludwig, K., eds, The Routledge Handbook of Collective Intentionality, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 389–402.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2014). A Natural History of Human Thinking, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tönnies, F. (2001). Tönnies: Community and Civil Society (Hollis, M., trans., Harris, J., Ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trawny, P. (2014). Heidegger und der Mythos der jüdischen Weltverschwörung, Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Tugendhat, E. (2001). Aufsätze 1992–2000, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Tuomela, R. (2013). Social Ontology: Collective Intentionality and Group Agents, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tuomela, R., Hakli, R., & Mäkelä, P. (2020). Social Ontology in the Making: An Introduction. In Tuomela, R., Hakli, R., & Mäkelä, P., eds, Social Ontology in the Making, Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
van Buren, J. (1994). The Young Heidegger: Rumor of the Hidden King, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Varga, S. (2020). Toward a Perceptual Account of Mindreading. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 100(2), pp. 380–401.Google Scholar
Vattimo, G. (1988). The End of Modernity: Nihilism and Hermeneutics in Post-modern Culture, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Vattimo, G. (1997). Beyond Interpretation: The Meaning of Hermeneutics for Philosophy, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, L. (1994). The Fragile We: Ethical Implications Of Heidegger’s Being and Time, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
von Herrmann, F.-W., & Alfieri, F. (2017). Martin Heidegger: Die Wahrheit über die Schwarzen Hefte, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Walsh, P. (2019). Intercorporeity and the First-person Plural in Merleau-Ponty. Continental Philosophy Review, 53, pp. 21–47.Google Scholar
Ward, K. (2021). Responsible for Destiny: Historizing, Historicality, and Community. Gatherings: The Heidegger Circle Annual, 11, pp. 198–226.Google Scholar
Watson, G. (1996). Two Faces of Responsibility. Philosophical Topics, 24(2), pp. 227–248.Google Scholar
Webb, D. (2011). Heidegger, Ethics and the Practice of Ontology, London, New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (2019). Economy and Society: A New Translation (Tribe, K., trans.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weichold, M. (2017). Social Authenticity: Towards a Heideggerian Analysis of Social Change. In Schmid, H. B. & Thonhauser, G., eds, From Conventionalism to Social Authenticity: Heidegger’s Anyone and Contemporary Social Theory, New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Westerlund, F. (2020). Heidegger and the Problem of Phenomena, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Winch, P. (1999). Understanding a Primitive Society. In Frankenberry, N. K. & Penner, H. H., eds, Language, Truth, and Religious Belief: Studies in Twentieth-Century Theory and Method in Religion, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 342–377.Google Scholar
Withy, K. (2013). The Strategic Unity of Heidegger’s The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 51(2), pp. 161–178.Google Scholar
Withy, K. (2015). Heidegger on Being Uncanny, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withy, K. (2020). We Are a Conversation: Heidegger on How Language Uncovers. In Engelland, C., ed., Language and Phenomenology, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 132–148.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1967). Philosophical Investigations (Anscombe, G. E. M., trans.), Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolin, R. (Ed.). (1992). The Heidegger Controversy: A Critical Reader, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wolin, R. (2016). The Politics of Being: The Political Thought of Martin Heidegger, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wrathall, M. (1999). Practical Incommensurability and the Phenomenological Basis of Robust Realism. Inquiry, 42(1), pp. 79–88.Google Scholar
Wrathall, M. (2002). Heidegger, Truth, and Reference. Inquiry, 45(2), pp. 217–228.Google Scholar
Wrathall, M. (2011). Heidegger and Unconcealment: Truth, Language, and History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wrathall, M. (2014). Autonomy, Authenticity, and the Self. In McManus, D., ed., Heidegger, Authenticity and the Self: Themes from Division Two of Being and Time, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 193–214.Google Scholar
Wrathall, M. (2015). “Demanding Authenticity of Ourselves”: Heidegger on Authenticity as an Extra-Moral Ideal. In Pedersen, H. & Altman, M., eds, Horizons of Authenticity in Phenomenology, Existentialism, and Moral Psychology: Essays in Honor of Charles Guignon, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 347–368.Google Scholar
Wrathall, M. (2017). “I” “here” and “you” “there”. Yearbook for Eastern and Western Philosophy, 2017(2), pp. 223–234.Google Scholar
Wrathall, M. (2018). The Task of Thinking in a Technological Age. In Wendland, A. J., Merwin, C., & Hadjioannou, C., eds, Heidegger on Technology, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 13–38.Google Scholar
Young, . (2008). Heidegger, Philosophy, Nazism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2001). Husserl and Transcendental Intersubjectivity: A Response to the Linguistic-Pragmatic Critique, Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2008). Internalism, Externalism, and Transcendental Idealism. Synthese, 160(3), 355–374.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2010). Empathy, Embodiment and Interpersonal Understanding: From Lipps to Schutz. Inquiry, 53(3), pp. 285–306.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2014). Self and Other: Exploring Subjectivity, Empathy, and Shame, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2015a). Self and Other: From Pure Ego to Co-constituted We. Continental Philosophy Review, 48(2), pp. 143–160.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2015b). You, Me, and We: The Sharing of Emotional Experiences. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 22(1–2), pp. 84–101.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2018). Collective Intentionality and Plural Pre-Reflective Self-Awareness. Journal of Social Philosophy, 49(1), pp. 61–75.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (2019). Second-Person Engagement, Self-Alienation, and Group-Identification. Topoi, 38(1), pp. 251–260.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D., & Rochat, P. (2015). Empathy≠sharing: Perspectives from Phenomenology and Developmental Psychology. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, pp. 543–553.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Nicolai K. Knudsen, Aarhus Universitet, Denmark
  • Book: Heidegger's Social Ontology
  • Online publication: 18 February 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009122672.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Nicolai K. Knudsen, Aarhus Universitet, Denmark
  • Book: Heidegger's Social Ontology
  • Online publication: 18 February 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009122672.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Nicolai K. Knudsen, Aarhus Universitet, Denmark
  • Book: Heidegger's Social Ontology
  • Online publication: 18 February 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009122672.014
Available formats
×