Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T11:26:40.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Works Cited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2020

Arash Abazari
Arash Abazari
Affiliation:
Sharif University of Technology
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Hegel's Ontology of Power
The Structure of Social Domination in Capitalism
 , pp. 205 - 212
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Note: The bibliography of the main primary works is at the beginning of the book.

Abazari, Arash. “Marx’s Conception of Dialectical Contradiction in Commodity,” Hegel-Bulletin, 1–21. doi:10.1017/hgl.2018.29, 2019.Google Scholar
Albrecht, Wolfgang. Hegels Gottesbeweis: Eine Studie zur Wissenschaft der Logik. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1958.Google Scholar
Allen, Amy. “Feminist Perspectives on Power,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2014 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/feminist-power.Google Scholar
Angehrn, Emil. Freiheit und System bei Hegel. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1977.Google Scholar
Backhaus, Hans-Georg. Dialektik der Wertform: Untersuchungen zur Marxschen Ökonomiekritik. Freiburg: Ça ira, 1997.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. The Second Sex, trans. H. M. Parshley. New York: Vintage Books, 1989 [1952].Google Scholar
Bell, John R. Capitalism and the Dialectic: The Uno–Sekine Approach to Marxian Political Economy. London: Pluto Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Bensaïd, Daniel. Marx for Our Times: Adventures and Misadventures of a Critique. London: Verso, 2009.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. “Two Concepts of Liberty,” in Berlin, Isaiah, Liberty, ed. Hardy, Henry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 166–217, 2002 [1969].Google Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences, 4th Edition. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis, 1998.Google Scholar
Bordignon, Michela. “Contradiction or Non-contradiction? Hegel’s Dialectic between Brandom and Priest,” Verifiche XLI (1–3), 2012.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. “The Structure of Desire and Recognition: Self-Consciousness and Self-Constitution,” Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (1): 127–50, 2007.Google Scholar
Burbidge, John W. Hegel’s Systematic Contingency. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar
Butterfield, Herbert. The Origins of Modern Science: 1300–1800. New York: Macmillan, 1957.Google Scholar
Carver, Terrell. “Introduction” to Karl Marx: Texts on Method, trans and ed. Terrell Carver. New York: Barnes and Noble Books, 1975.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. “The Structure of Proletarian Unfreedom,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 12 (1, Winter): 3–33, 1983.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. Why Not Socialism? Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Croce, Benedetto. What Is Living and What Is Dead of the Philosophy of Hegel. New York: Garland, 1984 [1915].Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. Suicide: A Study in Sociology, trans. John A. Spaulding and George Simpson. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul, 1952 [1897].Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. Logic and Society: Contradictions and Possible Worlds. Chichester: Wiley, 1978.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Fink-Eitel, Hinrich. Dialektik und Sozialethik: Kommentierende Untersuchungen zu Hegels Logik. Meisenheim am Glan: Hain, 1978.Google Scholar
Finlayson, Lorna. An Introduction to Feminism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Fisher, Mark. Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? Winchester: Zero Books, 2009.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. “From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a ‘Post-Socialist’ Age,” New Left Review No. 212: 68–149, 1995.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy and Honneth, Axel. Redistribution or Recognition: A Political–Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso, 2003.Google Scholar
Fulda, Hans Friedrich, Horstmann, Rolf-Peter, and Theunissen, Michael. Kritische Darstellung der Metaphysik: Eine Diskussion über Hegels Logik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1980.Google Scholar
Furth, Peter. “Asymmetrische Gegensätze in der Sprache der Politik,” in Troja hört nicht auf zu brennen: Aufsätze aus den Jahren 1981 bis 2004. Berlin: Landtverlag, 2006 [1991].Google Scholar
Geras, Norman. “The Controversy about Marx and Justice,” Philosophica 33 (1): 33–86, 1984.Google Scholar
Geuss, Raymond. The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Geuss, Raymond. Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Goodfield, Eric Lee. Hegel and the Metaphysical Frontiers of Political Theory. London: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
Gray, John. Liberalism, 2nd Edition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Green, T. H., Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1895.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, “Labor and Interaction: Remarks on Hegel’s Jena Philosophy of Mind,” in Theory and Practice, trans. J. Viertel. Boston: Beacon Press, pp. 142–69, 1973.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Hardimon, Michael. Hegel’s Social Philosophy: The Project of Reconciliation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Klaus. Die Marxsche Theorie: Eine philosophische Untersuchung zu den Hauptschriften. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1970.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Klaus. “Die ontologische Option,” in Die ontologische Option, ed. Hartmann, Klaus. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 1–30, 1976.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Klaus. Hegels Logik. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1999.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. The Limits to Capital. London: Verso, 2006.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. A Companion to Marx’s Capital: Volume One. London: Verso, 2010.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. “History versus Theory: A Commentary on Marx’s Method in Capital,” Historical Materialism 20 (2): 3–38, 2012.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. A Companion to Marx’s Capital: Volume Two. London: Verso, 2013.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. Marx, Capital, and the Madness of Economic Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Heinrich, Michael. “Abstrakte Arbeit,” in Historisch-kritisches Wörterbuch des Marxismus, ed. Haug, Wolfgang Fritz. Hamburg: Argument, 1994.Google Scholar
Heinrich, Michael. Die Wissenschaft vom Wert: Die Marxsche Kritik der politischen Ökonomie zwischen wissenschaftlicher Revolution und klassischer Tradition. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot, 1999.Google Scholar
Heinrich, Michael. Kritik der politischen Ökonomie: Eine Einführung. Stuttgart: Schmetterling Verlag, 2004.Google Scholar
Heinrich, Michael. Wie das Marxsche Kapital lesen? Teil 2. Stuttgart: Schmetterling Verlag, 2013.Google Scholar
Heinrich, Michael. “Grundbegriffe der Kritik der politischen Ökonomie,” in Marx Handbuch: Leben, Werk, Wirkung, ed. Quante, Michael and Schweikard, David. Stuttgart: Metzler Verlag, 2016.Google Scholar
Heinrichs, Johannes. Die Logik der Phänomenologie des Geistes. Bonn: Bouvier, 1974.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. “Hegels Theorie über den Zufall,” in Hegel im Kontext. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 157–86, 1971.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. “Hegels Logik der Reflexion,” in Die Wissenschaft der Logik und die Logik der Reflexion, Hegel-Tage Chantilly 1971, Hegel-Studien, Beiheft 18. Bonn: Bouvier, pp. 203–324, 1978.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. “Logische Form und reale Totalität,” in Hegels Philosophie des Rechts: Die Theorie der Rechtsformen und ihre Logik, ed. Henrich, Dieter and Horstmann, Rolf-Peter. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, pp. 428–519, 1982.Google Scholar
Herzog, Lisa. Inventing the Market: Smith, Hegel, and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas Sören. Die Absolute Form: Modalität, Individualität und das Prinzip der Philosophie nach Kant und Hegel. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1991.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas Sören. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: Eine Propädeutik. Wiesbaden: Marixverlag, 2012.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. The Pathologies of Individual Freedom: Hegel’s Social Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. “Recognition as Ideology: The Connection between Morality and Power,” in The I in We: Studies in the Theory of Recognition. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 75–97, 2012.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Hösle, Vittorio. Hegels System: Der Idealismus der Subjektivität und das Problem der Intersubjektivität. Hamburg: Meiner, 1998.Google Scholar
Houlgate, Stephen. “Necessity and Contingency in Hegel’s Science of Logic,” The Owl of Minerva 27 (1): 37–49, 1995.Google Scholar
Houlgate, Stephen. The Opening of Hegel’s Logic: From Being to Infinity. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Houlgate, Stephen. “Essence, Reflexion and Immediacy in Hegel’s Science of Logic,” in A Companion to Hegel, ed. Houlgate, Stephen and Bauer, Michael. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 139–58, 2011.Google Scholar
Hume, David. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Millican, Peter F., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Iber, Christian. Metaphysik absoluter Relationalität: Eine Studie zu den beiden ersten Kapiteln von Hegels Wesenslogik. Berlin: W. de Gruyter, 1990.Google Scholar
Jaeggi, Rahel. “Was ist Ideologiekritik?,” in Was ist Kritik?, ed. Jaeggi, Rahel and Wesche, Tilo. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 266–95, 2009.Google Scholar
Jaeschke, Walter. “Äußerliche Reflexion und immanente Reflexion: Eine Skizze der systematischen Geschichte des Reflexionsbegriffs in Hegels Logik-Entwürfen,” Hegel-Studien 13: 85–118, 1978.Google Scholar
Jaeschke, Walter. Hegel-Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Schule. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2003.Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob. “Konkurrenz,” in Historisch-kritisches Wörterbuch des Marxismus, ed. Haug, Wolfgang Fritz. Hamburg: Argument, Band 7/II: pp. 1542–63, 2010.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Political Writings, trans. Hans Siegbert Reiss. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Laplace, Pierre Simon. A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities, trans. Frederick Truscott and Frederick Emory. New York: Dover Publications, 1951.Google Scholar
Lask, Emil. Fichtes Idealismus und die Geschichte, Sämtliche Werke, Band I. Jena: Scheglmann, 2002 [1902].Google Scholar
Lebanidze, Giorgi. Hegel’s Transcendental Ontology. London: Lexington, 2019.Google Scholar
Lenin, Vladimir. Collected Works, Volume 38: Philosophical Notebooks. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1961 [1916].Google Scholar
Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Lohmann, Georg. Indifferenz und Gesellschaft: Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit Marx. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1991.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. Hegel’s Critique of Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. Essays über Realismus. Berlin: Aufbau-Verlag, 1948. [Essays on Realism, trans. David Fernbach. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1980.]Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. The Young Hegel: Studies in the Relations between Dialectics and Economics, trans. Rodney Livingstone. London: Merlin, 1975 [1948].Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. The Ontology of Social Being: Hegel, trans. David Fernbach. London: Merlin Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Luxemburg, Rosa. Reform or Revolution and Other Writings. New York: Dover Publications, 2012.Google Scholar
Macherey, Pierre. Hegel or Spinoza, trans. Susan M. Ruddick. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. “Difference and Dominance: On Sex Discrimination,” in Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 32–45, 1987a.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. “Desire and Power,” in Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 46–62, 1987b.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Majetschak, Stefan, Die Logik des Absoluten: Spekulation und Zeitlichkeit in der Philosophie Hegels. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1992.Google Scholar
Mandel, Ernest. “Introduction” to Marx, Karl. Capital: Volume Two. London: Penguin Books, 1978.Google Scholar
Mandel, Ernest. “How to Make No Sense of Marx?,” in Analyzing Marxism: New Essays on Analytical Marxism, ed. Ware, Robert and Nielsen, Kai, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 15, The University of Calgary Press, pp. 105–32, 1989.Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert. Reason and Revolution: Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory. Boston: Beacon Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert. Hegels Ontologie und die Grundlegung einer Theorie der Geschichtlichkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1975.Google Scholar
Megill, Allan. Karl Marx: The Burden of Reason (Why Marx Rejected Politics and the Market). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. “Acosmism or Weak Individuals? Hegel, Spinoza, and the Reality of the Finite,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (1): 77–92, 2010.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance and Thought. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Menke, Christoph. “Das Nichtanerkennbare: Oder warum das moderne Recht keine Sphäre der Anerkennung ist,” in Sozialphilosophie und Kritik, ed. Forst, R., Hartmann, M., Jaeggi, R., and Saar, M.. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 87–108, 2009.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty, ed. Bromwich, David and Kateb, George. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. Principles of Political Economy. Amherst: Prometheus Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Morishima, Michio. Marx’s Economics: A Dual Theory of Value and Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Moseley, Fred. “Marx’s Reproduction Schemes and Smith’s Dogma,” in The Circulation of Capital: Essays on Volume Two of Marx’s Capital, ed. Arthur, C. J. and Reuten, G. A.. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Moyar, Dean. “Thought and Metaphysics: Hegel’s Critical Reception of Spinoza,” in Spinoza and German Idealism, ed. Förster, Eckart and Melamed, Yitzhak Y.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197–213, 2012.Google Scholar
Mure, G. R. G. A Study of Hegel’s Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Negri, Antonio. The Savage Anomaly: The Power of Spinoza’s Metaphysics and Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick. Foundations of Hegel’s Social Theory: Actualizing Freedom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Brian. Adorno. London: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Peperzak, Adriaan. Modern Freedom: Hegel’s Legal, Moral, and Political Philosophy. Berlin: Springer, 2001.Google Scholar
Patten, Alan. Hegel’s Idea of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. “The Doctrine of Necessity Examined,” The Monist 2 (3): 321–37, 1892.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Pinkard, Terry. Hegel’s Dialectic: The Explanation of Possibility. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Pinkard, Terry. German Philosophy, 1760–1860: The Legacy of Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Pinkard, Terry. “Recognition, the Right, the Good,” in The Philosophy of Recognition: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, ed. Schmidt am Busch, Hans-Christoph and Zurn, Christopher F.. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2010.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. “Hegel’s Ethical Rationalism,” in Idealism and Modernism: Hegelian Variations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 417–50, 1997.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. “Recognition and Reconciliation: Actualized Agency in Hegel’s Jena Phenomenology,” in Recognition and Power: Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory, ed. van den Brink, Bert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–78, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. Hegel’s Practical Philosophy: Rational Agency as Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. “Individualism versus Collectivism,” in Popper Selections, ed. Miller, David. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 338–44, 1983.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. The Poverty of Historicism, 2nd Edition. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis, 2012 [1957].Google Scholar
Postone, Moishe. Time, Labor, and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx’s Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Priest, Graham. Beyond the Limits of Thought, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Quante, Michael. “Schichtung oder Setzung? Hegels Reflexionslogische Bestimmung des Natur–Geist-Verhältnisses,” Hegel-Studien 37: 107–21, 2002.Google Scholar
Rand, Sebastian. “What’s Wrong with Rex? Hegel on Animal Defect and Individuality,” European Journal of Philosophy 23 (1): 68–86, 2015.Google Scholar
Robinson, Joan. An Essay on Marxian Economics, 2nd Edition. London: Macmillan, 1966.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, Alessandro. The Wealth of Ideas: A History of Economic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Rosen, Michael. On Voluntary Servitude: False Consciousness and the Theory of Ideology. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Ruben, David-Hillel. The Metaphysics of the Social World. London: Routledge, 1985.Google Scholar
Rubin, Isaak Illich. Essays on Marx’s Theory of Value, trans. Fredy Perlman and Miloš Samardžija. Delhi: Aakar, 2008 [1923].Google Scholar
Ruda, Frank. Hegel’s Rabble: An Investigation into Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. London: Continuum, 2011.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael J. “The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self,” Political Theory 12 (1): 81–96, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandkaulen, Birgit. “Die Ontologie der Substanz, der Begriff der Subjektivität und die Faktizität des Einzelnen: Hegels reflexionslogische „Widerlegung“ der Spinozanischen Metaphysik,” in Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus 5: 235–75, 2007.Google Scholar
Schick, Friedrike. “Die Lehre vom Begriff: Erster Abschnitt. Die Subjectivität,” in Kommentar zu Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik, ed. Quante, Michael and Mooren, Nadine. Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 457–558, 2018.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Gerhart. “Das Spiel der Modalitäten und die Macht der Notwendigkeit: Zu Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik,” in Hegel in der Sicht der neueren Forschung, ed. Fetscher, Iring. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, pp. 188–206, 1973.Google Scholar
Schnädelbach, Herbert. “Was ist Ideologie? Versuch einer Begriffsklärung,” Das Argument 50: 71–92, 1969.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Sekine, Thomas T. The Dialectic of Capital: A Study of the Inner Logic of Capitalism. Tokyo: Yushindo, 1984.Google Scholar
Smith, Tony. The Logic of Marx’s Capital: Replies to Hegelian Criticism. Albany: SUNY Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Smith, Tony. “Hegel, Marx and the Comprehension of Capitalism,” in Marx’s Capital and Hegel’s Logic: A Reexamination, ed. Mosley, Fred and Smith, Tony. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Smith, Tony. Beyond Liberal Egalitarianism: Marx and Normative Social Theory in the Twenty-First Century. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar
Sraffa, Piero. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. Hegel. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Theunissen, Michael. “Krise der Macht: Thesen zur Theorie des dialektischen Widerspruchs,” in Hegel Jahrbuch. Meisenheim am Glan: Anton Hain Verlag, pp. 319–29, 1974.Google Scholar
Theunissen, Michael. Sein und Schein: Die kritische Funktion der Hegelschen Logik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1978.Google Scholar
Theunissen, Michael. “Die verdrängte Intersubjektivität in Hegels Philosophie des Rechts,” in Hegels Philosophie des Rechts: Die Theorie der Rechtsformen und ihre Logik, ed. Henrich, Dieter and Horstmann, Rolf-Peter. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, pp. 317–81, 1982.Google Scholar
Theunissen, Michael. “Begriff und Realität: Hegels Auffassung des metaphysischen Wahrheitsbegriffs,” in Seminar: Dialektik in der Philosophie Hegels, ed. Horstmann, Rolf-Peter. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 324–59, 1989 [1975].Google Scholar
Vieweg, Klaus. Das Denken der Freiheit: Hegels Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 2012.Google Scholar
Wallace, Robert M. Hegel’s Philosophy of Reality, Freedom, and God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Wieland, Wolfgang. “Das Individuum und seine Identifizierung in der Welt der Kontingenz,” in Denken der Individualität: Festschrift für Josef Simon zum 65. Geburtstag, ed. Hoffmann, Thomas Sören and Majetschak, Stefan. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 3–25, 1995.Google Scholar
Wolff, Michael. Der Begriff des Widerspruchs: Eine Studie zur Dialektik Kants und Hegels. Königstein im Taunus: Hain, 1981.Google Scholar
Wolff, Michael. “Über Hegels Lehre vom Widerspruch,” in Probleme der Hegelschen Logik, ed. Henrich, Dieter. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, pp. 107–28, 1986.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen. Hegel’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen. The Free Development of Each: Studies on Freedom, Right, and Ethics in Classical German Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Yeomans, Christopher. Freedom and Reflection: Hegel and the Logic of Agency. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Yeomans, Christopher. “Power as Control and the Therapeutic Effects of Hegel’s Logic,” Hegel Bulletin 36 (1): 33–52, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. “Recognition of Love’s Labor: Considering Axel Honneth’s Feminism,” in Recognition and Power, pp. 189–212, 2007.Google Scholar
Zelený, Jindřich. The Logic of Marx, trans. Terrell Carver. Oxford: Blackwell, 1980.Google Scholar
Abazari, Arash. “Marx’s Conception of Dialectical Contradiction in Commodity,” Hegel-Bulletin, 1–21. doi:10.1017/hgl.2018.29, 2019.Google Scholar
Albrecht, Wolfgang. Hegels Gottesbeweis: Eine Studie zur Wissenschaft der Logik. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1958.Google Scholar
Allen, Amy. “Feminist Perspectives on Power,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2014 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2014/entries/feminist-power.Google Scholar
Angehrn, Emil. Freiheit und System bei Hegel. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1977.Google Scholar
Backhaus, Hans-Georg. Dialektik der Wertform: Untersuchungen zur Marxschen Ökonomiekritik. Freiburg: Ça ira, 1997.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. The Second Sex, trans. H. M. Parshley. New York: Vintage Books, 1989 [1952].Google Scholar
Bell, John R. Capitalism and the Dialectic: The Uno–Sekine Approach to Marxian Political Economy. London: Pluto Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Bensaïd, Daniel. Marx for Our Times: Adventures and Misadventures of a Critique. London: Verso, 2009.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. “Two Concepts of Liberty,” in Berlin, Isaiah, Liberty, ed. Hardy, Henry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 166–217, 2002 [1969].Google Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences, 4th Edition. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis, 1998.Google Scholar
Bordignon, Michela. “Contradiction or Non-contradiction? Hegel’s Dialectic between Brandom and Priest,” Verifiche XLI (1–3), 2012.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. “The Structure of Desire and Recognition: Self-Consciousness and Self-Constitution,” Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (1): 127–50, 2007.Google Scholar
Burbidge, John W. Hegel’s Systematic Contingency. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.Google Scholar
Butterfield, Herbert. The Origins of Modern Science: 1300–1800. New York: Macmillan, 1957.Google Scholar
Carver, Terrell. “Introduction” to Karl Marx: Texts on Method, trans and ed. Terrell Carver. New York: Barnes and Noble Books, 1975.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. “The Structure of Proletarian Unfreedom,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 12 (1, Winter): 3–33, 1983.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. Why Not Socialism? Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Croce, Benedetto. What Is Living and What Is Dead of the Philosophy of Hegel. New York: Garland, 1984 [1915].Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. Suicide: A Study in Sociology, trans. John A. Spaulding and George Simpson. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul, 1952 [1897].Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. Logic and Society: Contradictions and Possible Worlds. Chichester: Wiley, 1978.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Fink-Eitel, Hinrich. Dialektik und Sozialethik: Kommentierende Untersuchungen zu Hegels Logik. Meisenheim am Glan: Hain, 1978.Google Scholar
Finlayson, Lorna. An Introduction to Feminism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Fisher, Mark. Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? Winchester: Zero Books, 2009.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. “From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a ‘Post-Socialist’ Age,” New Left Review No. 212: 68–149, 1995.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy and Honneth, Axel. Redistribution or Recognition: A Political–Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso, 2003.Google Scholar
Fulda, Hans Friedrich, Horstmann, Rolf-Peter, and Theunissen, Michael. Kritische Darstellung der Metaphysik: Eine Diskussion über Hegels Logik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1980.Google Scholar
Furth, Peter. “Asymmetrische Gegensätze in der Sprache der Politik,” in Troja hört nicht auf zu brennen: Aufsätze aus den Jahren 1981 bis 2004. Berlin: Landtverlag, 2006 [1991].Google Scholar
Geras, Norman. “The Controversy about Marx and Justice,” Philosophica 33 (1): 33–86, 1984.Google Scholar
Geuss, Raymond. The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Geuss, Raymond. Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Goodfield, Eric Lee. Hegel and the Metaphysical Frontiers of Political Theory. London: Routledge, 2014.Google Scholar
Gray, John. Liberalism, 2nd Edition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Green, T. H., Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1895.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, “Labor and Interaction: Remarks on Hegel’s Jena Philosophy of Mind,” in Theory and Practice, trans. J. Viertel. Boston: Beacon Press, pp. 142–69, 1973.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Hardimon, Michael. Hegel’s Social Philosophy: The Project of Reconciliation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Klaus. Die Marxsche Theorie: Eine philosophische Untersuchung zu den Hauptschriften. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1970.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Klaus. “Die ontologische Option,” in Die ontologische Option, ed. Hartmann, Klaus. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 1–30, 1976.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Klaus. Hegels Logik. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1999.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. The Limits to Capital. London: Verso, 2006.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. A Companion to Marx’s Capital: Volume One. London: Verso, 2010.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. “History versus Theory: A Commentary on Marx’s Method in Capital,” Historical Materialism 20 (2): 3–38, 2012.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. A Companion to Marx’s Capital: Volume Two. London: Verso, 2013.Google Scholar
Harvey, David. Marx, Capital, and the Madness of Economic Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Heinrich, Michael. “Abstrakte Arbeit,” in Historisch-kritisches Wörterbuch des Marxismus, ed. Haug, Wolfgang Fritz. Hamburg: Argument, 1994.Google Scholar
Heinrich, Michael. Die Wissenschaft vom Wert: Die Marxsche Kritik der politischen Ökonomie zwischen wissenschaftlicher Revolution und klassischer Tradition. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot, 1999.Google Scholar
Heinrich, Michael. Kritik der politischen Ökonomie: Eine Einführung. Stuttgart: Schmetterling Verlag, 2004.Google Scholar
Heinrich, Michael. Wie das Marxsche Kapital lesen? Teil 2. Stuttgart: Schmetterling Verlag, 2013.Google Scholar
Heinrich, Michael. “Grundbegriffe der Kritik der politischen Ökonomie,” in Marx Handbuch: Leben, Werk, Wirkung, ed. Quante, Michael and Schweikard, David. Stuttgart: Metzler Verlag, 2016.Google Scholar
Heinrichs, Johannes. Die Logik der Phänomenologie des Geistes. Bonn: Bouvier, 1974.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. “Hegels Theorie über den Zufall,” in Hegel im Kontext. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 157–86, 1971.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. “Hegels Logik der Reflexion,” in Die Wissenschaft der Logik und die Logik der Reflexion, Hegel-Tage Chantilly 1971, Hegel-Studien, Beiheft 18. Bonn: Bouvier, pp. 203–324, 1978.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. “Logische Form und reale Totalität,” in Hegels Philosophie des Rechts: Die Theorie der Rechtsformen und ihre Logik, ed. Henrich, Dieter and Horstmann, Rolf-Peter. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, pp. 428–519, 1982.Google Scholar
Herzog, Lisa. Inventing the Market: Smith, Hegel, and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas Sören. Die Absolute Form: Modalität, Individualität und das Prinzip der Philosophie nach Kant und Hegel. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1991.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas Sören. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel: Eine Propädeutik. Wiesbaden: Marixverlag, 2012.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. The Pathologies of Individual Freedom: Hegel’s Social Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. “Recognition as Ideology: The Connection between Morality and Power,” in The I in We: Studies in the Theory of Recognition. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 75–97, 2012.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Hösle, Vittorio. Hegels System: Der Idealismus der Subjektivität und das Problem der Intersubjektivität. Hamburg: Meiner, 1998.Google Scholar
Houlgate, Stephen. “Necessity and Contingency in Hegel’s Science of Logic,” The Owl of Minerva 27 (1): 37–49, 1995.Google Scholar
Houlgate, Stephen. The Opening of Hegel’s Logic: From Being to Infinity. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Houlgate, Stephen. “Essence, Reflexion and Immediacy in Hegel’s Science of Logic,” in A Companion to Hegel, ed. Houlgate, Stephen and Bauer, Michael. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 139–58, 2011.Google Scholar
Hume, David. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Millican, Peter F., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Iber, Christian. Metaphysik absoluter Relationalität: Eine Studie zu den beiden ersten Kapiteln von Hegels Wesenslogik. Berlin: W. de Gruyter, 1990.Google Scholar
Jaeggi, Rahel. “Was ist Ideologiekritik?,” in Was ist Kritik?, ed. Jaeggi, Rahel and Wesche, Tilo. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 266–95, 2009.Google Scholar
Jaeschke, Walter. “Äußerliche Reflexion und immanente Reflexion: Eine Skizze der systematischen Geschichte des Reflexionsbegriffs in Hegels Logik-Entwürfen,” Hegel-Studien 13: 85–118, 1978.Google Scholar
Jaeschke, Walter. Hegel-Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Schule. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2003.Google Scholar
Jessop, Bob. “Konkurrenz,” in Historisch-kritisches Wörterbuch des Marxismus, ed. Haug, Wolfgang Fritz. Hamburg: Argument, Band 7/II: pp. 1542–63, 2010.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Political Writings, trans. Hans Siegbert Reiss. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Laplace, Pierre Simon. A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities, trans. Frederick Truscott and Frederick Emory. New York: Dover Publications, 1951.Google Scholar
Lask, Emil. Fichtes Idealismus und die Geschichte, Sämtliche Werke, Band I. Jena: Scheglmann, 2002 [1902].Google Scholar
Lebanidze, Giorgi. Hegel’s Transcendental Ontology. London: Lexington, 2019.Google Scholar
Lenin, Vladimir. Collected Works, Volume 38: Philosophical Notebooks. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1961 [1916].Google Scholar
Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Lohmann, Georg. Indifferenz und Gesellschaft: Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit Marx. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1991.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. Hegel’s Critique of Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. Essays über Realismus. Berlin: Aufbau-Verlag, 1948. [Essays on Realism, trans. David Fernbach. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1980.]Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. The Young Hegel: Studies in the Relations between Dialectics and Economics, trans. Rodney Livingstone. London: Merlin, 1975 [1948].Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg. The Ontology of Social Being: Hegel, trans. David Fernbach. London: Merlin Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Luxemburg, Rosa. Reform or Revolution and Other Writings. New York: Dover Publications, 2012.Google Scholar
Macherey, Pierre. Hegel or Spinoza, trans. Susan M. Ruddick. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. “Difference and Dominance: On Sex Discrimination,” in Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 32–45, 1987a.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine. “Desire and Power,” in Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 46–62, 1987b.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Majetschak, Stefan, Die Logik des Absoluten: Spekulation und Zeitlichkeit in der Philosophie Hegels. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1992.Google Scholar
Mandel, Ernest. “Introduction” to Marx, Karl. Capital: Volume Two. London: Penguin Books, 1978.Google Scholar
Mandel, Ernest. “How to Make No Sense of Marx?,” in Analyzing Marxism: New Essays on Analytical Marxism, ed. Ware, Robert and Nielsen, Kai, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 15, The University of Calgary Press, pp. 105–32, 1989.Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert. Reason and Revolution: Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory. Boston: Beacon Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert. Hegels Ontologie und die Grundlegung einer Theorie der Geschichtlichkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1975.Google Scholar
Megill, Allan. Karl Marx: The Burden of Reason (Why Marx Rejected Politics and the Market). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. “Acosmism or Weak Individuals? Hegel, Spinoza, and the Reality of the Finite,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (1): 77–92, 2010.Google Scholar
Melamed, Yitzhak Y. Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance and Thought. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Menke, Christoph. “Das Nichtanerkennbare: Oder warum das moderne Recht keine Sphäre der Anerkennung ist,” in Sozialphilosophie und Kritik, ed. Forst, R., Hartmann, M., Jaeggi, R., and Saar, M.. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 87–108, 2009.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty, ed. Bromwich, David and Kateb, George. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. Principles of Political Economy. Amherst: Prometheus Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Morishima, Michio. Marx’s Economics: A Dual Theory of Value and Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Moseley, Fred. “Marx’s Reproduction Schemes and Smith’s Dogma,” in The Circulation of Capital: Essays on Volume Two of Marx’s Capital, ed. Arthur, C. J. and Reuten, G. A.. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Moyar, Dean. “Thought and Metaphysics: Hegel’s Critical Reception of Spinoza,” in Spinoza and German Idealism, ed. Förster, Eckart and Melamed, Yitzhak Y.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197–213, 2012.Google Scholar
Mure, G. R. G. A Study of Hegel’s Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1950.Google Scholar
Negri, Antonio. The Savage Anomaly: The Power of Spinoza’s Metaphysics and Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick. Foundations of Hegel’s Social Theory: Actualizing Freedom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Brian. Adorno. London: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar
Peperzak, Adriaan. Modern Freedom: Hegel’s Legal, Moral, and Political Philosophy. Berlin: Springer, 2001.Google Scholar
Patten, Alan. Hegel’s Idea of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. “The Doctrine of Necessity Examined,” The Monist 2 (3): 321–37, 1892.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Pinkard, Terry. Hegel’s Dialectic: The Explanation of Possibility. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Pinkard, Terry. German Philosophy, 1760–1860: The Legacy of Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Pinkard, Terry. “Recognition, the Right, the Good,” in The Philosophy of Recognition: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, ed. Schmidt am Busch, Hans-Christoph and Zurn, Christopher F.. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2010.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. “Hegel’s Ethical Rationalism,” in Idealism and Modernism: Hegelian Variations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 417–50, 1997.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. “Recognition and Reconciliation: Actualized Agency in Hegel’s Jena Phenomenology,” in Recognition and Power: Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory, ed. van den Brink, Bert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–78, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. Hegel’s Practical Philosophy: Rational Agency as Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. “Individualism versus Collectivism,” in Popper Selections, ed. Miller, David. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 338–44, 1983.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. The Poverty of Historicism, 2nd Edition. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis, 2012 [1957].Google Scholar
Postone, Moishe. Time, Labor, and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx’s Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Priest, Graham. Beyond the Limits of Thought, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Quante, Michael. “Schichtung oder Setzung? Hegels Reflexionslogische Bestimmung des Natur–Geist-Verhältnisses,” Hegel-Studien 37: 107–21, 2002.Google Scholar
Rand, Sebastian. “What’s Wrong with Rex? Hegel on Animal Defect and Individuality,” European Journal of Philosophy 23 (1): 68–86, 2015.Google Scholar
Robinson, Joan. An Essay on Marxian Economics, 2nd Edition. London: Macmillan, 1966.Google Scholar
Roncaglia, Alessandro. The Wealth of Ideas: A History of Economic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Rosen, Michael. On Voluntary Servitude: False Consciousness and the Theory of Ideology. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Ruben, David-Hillel. The Metaphysics of the Social World. London: Routledge, 1985.Google Scholar
Rubin, Isaak Illich. Essays on Marx’s Theory of Value, trans. Fredy Perlman and Miloš Samardžija. Delhi: Aakar, 2008 [1923].Google Scholar
Ruda, Frank. Hegel’s Rabble: An Investigation into Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. London: Continuum, 2011.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael J. “The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self,” Political Theory 12 (1): 81–96, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandkaulen, Birgit. “Die Ontologie der Substanz, der Begriff der Subjektivität und die Faktizität des Einzelnen: Hegels reflexionslogische „Widerlegung“ der Spinozanischen Metaphysik,” in Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus 5: 235–75, 2007.Google Scholar
Schick, Friedrike. “Die Lehre vom Begriff: Erster Abschnitt. Die Subjectivität,” in Kommentar zu Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik, ed. Quante, Michael and Mooren, Nadine. Hamburg: Meiner, pp. 457–558, 2018.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Gerhart. “Das Spiel der Modalitäten und die Macht der Notwendigkeit: Zu Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik,” in Hegel in der Sicht der neueren Forschung, ed. Fetscher, Iring. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, pp. 188–206, 1973.Google Scholar
Schnädelbach, Herbert. “Was ist Ideologie? Versuch einer Begriffsklärung,” Das Argument 50: 71–92, 1969.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Sekine, Thomas T. The Dialectic of Capital: A Study of the Inner Logic of Capitalism. Tokyo: Yushindo, 1984.Google Scholar
Smith, Tony. The Logic of Marx’s Capital: Replies to Hegelian Criticism. Albany: SUNY Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Smith, Tony. “Hegel, Marx and the Comprehension of Capitalism,” in Marx’s Capital and Hegel’s Logic: A Reexamination, ed. Mosley, Fred and Smith, Tony. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar
Smith, Tony. Beyond Liberal Egalitarianism: Marx and Normative Social Theory in the Twenty-First Century. Leiden: Brill, 2017.Google Scholar
Sraffa, Piero. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. Hegel. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Theunissen, Michael. “Krise der Macht: Thesen zur Theorie des dialektischen Widerspruchs,” in Hegel Jahrbuch. Meisenheim am Glan: Anton Hain Verlag, pp. 319–29, 1974.Google Scholar
Theunissen, Michael. Sein und Schein: Die kritische Funktion der Hegelschen Logik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1978.Google Scholar
Theunissen, Michael. “Die verdrängte Intersubjektivität in Hegels Philosophie des Rechts,” in Hegels Philosophie des Rechts: Die Theorie der Rechtsformen und ihre Logik, ed. Henrich, Dieter and Horstmann, Rolf-Peter. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, pp. 317–81, 1982.Google Scholar
Theunissen, Michael. “Begriff und Realität: Hegels Auffassung des metaphysischen Wahrheitsbegriffs,” in Seminar: Dialektik in der Philosophie Hegels, ed. Horstmann, Rolf-Peter. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 324–59, 1989 [1975].Google Scholar
Vieweg, Klaus. Das Denken der Freiheit: Hegels Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 2012.Google Scholar
Wallace, Robert M. Hegel’s Philosophy of Reality, Freedom, and God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Wieland, Wolfgang. “Das Individuum und seine Identifizierung in der Welt der Kontingenz,” in Denken der Individualität: Festschrift für Josef Simon zum 65. Geburtstag, ed. Hoffmann, Thomas Sören and Majetschak, Stefan. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 3–25, 1995.Google Scholar
Wolff, Michael. Der Begriff des Widerspruchs: Eine Studie zur Dialektik Kants und Hegels. Königstein im Taunus: Hain, 1981.Google Scholar
Wolff, Michael. “Über Hegels Lehre vom Widerspruch,” in Probleme der Hegelschen Logik, ed. Henrich, Dieter. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, pp. 107–28, 1986.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen. Hegel’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen. The Free Development of Each: Studies on Freedom, Right, and Ethics in Classical German Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Yeomans, Christopher. Freedom and Reflection: Hegel and the Logic of Agency. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Yeomans, Christopher. “Power as Control and the Therapeutic Effects of Hegel’s Logic,” Hegel Bulletin 36 (1): 33–52, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. “Recognition of Love’s Labor: Considering Axel Honneth’s Feminism,” in Recognition and Power, pp. 189–212, 2007.Google Scholar
Zelený, Jindřich. The Logic of Marx, trans. Terrell Carver. Oxford: Blackwell, 1980.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Works Cited
  • Arash Abazari
  • Book: Hegel's Ontology of Power
  • Online publication: 10 July 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108877329.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Works Cited
  • Arash Abazari
  • Book: Hegel's Ontology of Power
  • Online publication: 10 July 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108877329.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Works Cited
  • Arash Abazari
  • Book: Hegel's Ontology of Power
  • Online publication: 10 July 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108877329.008
Available formats
×