We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
The resolution of lexical ambiguity has been a main focus for the investigation of context effects in word recognition for the past twenty-five years (e.g. Hogaboam & Perfetti, 1975; Onifer & Swinney, 1981; Sereno, 1995; Simpson, 1981; Simpson & Burgess, 1985; Simpson & Krueger, 1991; Swinney, 1979; Tabossi, 1988; Tanenhaus, Leiman & Seidenberg, 1979). Most studies have been done on Indo-European languages (e.g. Dutch, English, and Italian), with little on non-Indo-European languages. In this chapter, we review studies on lexical ambiguity resolution in Chinese, a major Sino-Tibetan language, and show how they can contribute to our understanding of language processing. We begin with a review of models of lexical ambiguity resolution that have formed the main framework for studies on lexical ambiguity. Next we examine the different approaches used in this area. And then we discuss some linguistic properties of Chinese relevant to the study of lexical ambiguity, together with some recent studies conducted in our laboratories. Finally, we propose some directions for future studies.
Lexical ambiguity resolution: a test bench for modular/interactive theories
The fundamental purpose of language comprehension is the understanding of meaning. How is our language-processing system organized so meaning access is a rapid and accurate process? A central issue in psycholinguistics related to this question is whether the various language-processing subsystems (e.g. lexical and discourse subsystems) are interactive or modular in nature. The existing literature contains two opposing positions. Modular theory (Fodor, 1983; Forster, 1979) proposes the autonomy of the lexical processor.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
