Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Denjoy subsystems and horseshoes
- Impact Hamiltonian systems and polygonal billiards
- Some remarks on the classical KAM theorem, following Pöschel
- Some recent developments in Arnold diffusion
- Viscosity solutions of the Hamilton–Jacobi equation on a noncompact manifold
- Holonomy and vortex structures in quantum hydrodynamics
- Surfaces of locally minimal flux
- A symplectic approach to Arnold diffusion problems
- Hamiltonian ODE, homogenization, and symplectic topology
- References
Some remarks on the classical KAM theorem, following Pöschel
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 May 2024
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Denjoy subsystems and horseshoes
- Impact Hamiltonian systems and polygonal billiards
- Some remarks on the classical KAM theorem, following Pöschel
- Some recent developments in Arnold diffusion
- Viscosity solutions of the Hamilton–Jacobi equation on a noncompact manifold
- Holonomy and vortex structures in quantum hydrodynamics
- Surfaces of locally minimal flux
- A symplectic approach to Arnold diffusion problems
- Hamiltonian ODE, homogenization, and symplectic topology
- References
Summary
We propose a slight correction and a slight improvement on the main result contained in A Lecture on Classical KAM Theorem by J. Pöschel.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Hamiltonian SystemsDynamics, Analysis, Applications, pp. 67 - 74Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Bounemoura, A., “Positive measure of KAM tori for finitely differentiable Hamiltonians”, J. Éc. polytech. Math. 7 (2020), 1113–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bounemoura, A. and Féjoz, J., “KAM, α-Gevrey regularity and the α-Bruno–Rüssmann condition”, Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) 19:4 (2019), 1225–1279.Google Scholar
Koudjinan, C. E., “Quantitative KAM normal forms and sharp measure estimates”, preprint, 2019. arXiv 1904.13062Google Scholar
Popov, G., “KAM theorem for Gevrey Hamiltonians”, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 24:5 (2004), 1753–1786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pöschel, J., “A lecture on the classical KAM theorem”, pp. 707–732 in Smooth ergodic theory and its applications (Seattle, WA, 1999), edited by Katok, A. et al., Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 69, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2001.Google Scholar
Rüssmann, H., “Nondegeneracy in the perturbation theory of integrable dynamical systems”, pp. 5–18 in Number theory and dynamical systems (York, 1987), edited by Dodson, M. M. and Vickers, J. A. G., Math, London. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 134, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Rüssmann, H., “Invariant tori in non-degenerate nearly integrable Hamiltonian systems”, Regul. Chaotic Dyn. 6:2 (2001), 119–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüssmann, H., “Invariant tori in non-degenerate nearly integrable Hamiltonian systems”, Regul. Chaotic Dyn. 6:2 (2001), 119–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villanueva, J., “Kolmogorov theorem revisited”, J. Differential Equations 244:9 (2008), 2251–2276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar