Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:19:20.866Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Employment programs for the demobilized

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Get access

Summary

What became of the ex-combatants who demobilized? This chapter turns to this group's desires and efforts to fulfill them and how they fit (or did not) into the ruling party's agendas. The party sought to retain ex-combatant support and to build power and legitimacy by using ex-combatants in at least two ways. It deployed ex-combatants into cooperatives that symbolized economic transformation toward socialism, and it gave ex-combatants (chiefly ZANLA) privileged access to employment and training in the bureaucracy and private sector, both the preserve of its former Smith and Muzorewa enemies. It justified guerrilla privilege in terms of their war contribution. ZIPRA ex-combatants suffered the party's often violent wrath, experiencing difficulties in forming and sustaining cooperatives and obtaining employment or training where ZANU(PF) had control. Employed ZANLA ex-guerrillas used their positions of privilege to assert their authority and power over management and other workers. In the cooperatives, the ex-combatants were more adept at extracting and consuming resources than at using them productively. Ex-combatants justified their agendas with reference to their war contributions, often using violence and intimidation. The ruling party was both collaborator and antagonist as ZANLA ex-combatants sought privilege and power. Both ex-combatants and the party were skillful manipulators of NGOs.

Studies of demobilized ex-combatants in Zimbabwe tend to evaluate success in terms of subjective criteria. Some evaluate demobilization as a failure because it left a sizeable percentage of ex-combatants unemployed.

Type
Chapter
Information
Guerrilla Veterans in Post-war Zimbabwe
Symbolic and Violent Politics, 1980–1987
, pp. 141 - 184
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×