Book contents
- Green Trade and Fair Trade in and with the EUProcess-Based Measures within the EU Legal Order
- Cambridge Studies in European Law and Policy
- Green Trade and Fair Trade in and with the EU
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Series Editors’ Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Table of Legislation
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 EU Process-Based Measures
- 2 Member State Process-Based Measures as Restrictions on the Free Movement of Goods
- 3 Extraterritoriality within the Free Movement of Goods
- 4 Unilateralism within the Free Movement of Goods
- 5 Process-Based Measures and EU Competition Law
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 August 2017
Book contents
- Green Trade and Fair Trade in and with the EUProcess-Based Measures within the EU Legal Order
- Cambridge Studies in European Law and Policy
- Green Trade and Fair Trade in and with the EU
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Series Editors’ Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Table of Legislation
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 EU Process-Based Measures
- 2 Member State Process-Based Measures as Restrictions on the Free Movement of Goods
- 3 Extraterritoriality within the Free Movement of Goods
- 4 Unilateralism within the Free Movement of Goods
- 5 Process-Based Measures and EU Competition Law
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Green Trade and Fair Trade in and with the EUProcess-based Measures within the EU Legal Order, pp. 252 - 262Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Akerlof, GA, ‘The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism’ (1970) 84 Quarterly Journal of Economics, 488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alemanno, A, ‘The Better Regulation Initiative at the Judicial Gate: A Trojan Horse within the Commission’s Walls or the Way Forward?’ (2009) 15 European Law Journal, 382–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alemanno, A, ‘The European Reform of Organic Farming: Balancing Consumer Preferences and Free Movement Imperatives’ [2009] European Food and Feed Law Review, 406Google Scholar
Amato, G, Antitrust and the Bounds of Power: The Dilemma of Liberal Democracy in the History of the Market (Oxford: Hart 1997)Google Scholar
Ankersmit, L, ‘Het einde van de kiloknallers? De grenzen aan zelfregulering van duurzaam vlees onder het kartelverbod’ (2011) Actualiteiten Mededingingsrecht, 149Google Scholar
Ankersmit, L, ‘The Scope of the Common Commercial Policy after Lisbon: The Daiichi Sankyo and Conditional Access Services Grand Chamber Judgments’ (2014) 41 Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ankersmit, L, ‘What if Cassis de Dijon were Cassis de Quebec? The Assimilation of Goods of Third Country Origin in the Internal Market’ (2013) 50 Common Market Law Review, 1387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ankersmit, L and Lawrence, JC, ‘The Future of Environmental Labelling: US – Tuna II and the Scope of the TBT’ (2012) 39 Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ankersmit, LJ, Lawrence, JC, and Davies, GT, ‘Diverging EU and WTO Perspectives on Extraterritorial Process Regulation’ (2012) 21 Minnesota Journal of International Law Online, 58Google Scholar
Armstrong, KA, ‘Mutual Recognition’ in Barnard, Catherine and Scott, Joanne (eds.) The Law of the Single European Market: Unpacking the Premises (Oxford: Hart, 2002), 225Google Scholar
Arnould, J, ‘Secondary Policies in Public Procurement: The Innovations of the New Directives’ [2004] Public Procurement Law Review, 191Google Scholar
Arrowsmith, S, ‘The Purpose of the EU Procurement Directives: Ends, Means and the Implications for National Regulatory Space for Commercial and Horizontal Policies’ (2011–2012) 13 The Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrowsmith, S and Kunzlik, P (eds.), Social and Environmental Policies in EC Procurement Law: New Directives and New Directions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azoulai, L, ‘The Court of Justice and the Social Market Economy: The Emergence of an Ideal and the Conditions for Its Realization’ (2008) 45 Common Market Law Review, 1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, D, ‘Restrictions of Competition by Object under Article 101 TFEU’ (2012) 49 Common Market Law Review, 559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baksi, S and Bose, P, ‘Credence Goods, Efficient Labelling Policies, and Regulatory Enforcement’ (2007) 37 Environmental & Resource Economics, 411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balineau, G and Dufeu, I, ‘Are Fair Trade Goods Credence Goods? A New Proposal, with French Illustrations’ (2010) 92 Journal of Business Ethics 331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baquero Cruz, J, Between Competition and Free Movement: The Economic Constitutional Law of the European Community (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2002)Google Scholar
Baquero Cruz, J, ‘Free Movement and Private Autonomy’ (1999) 24 European Law Review, 603Google Scholar
Barnard, C, ‘Fitting the Remaining Pieces into the Goods and Persons Jigsaw’ (2001) 26 European Law Review, 35Google Scholar
Barnard, C, The Substantive Law of the EU: The Four Freedoms Third Edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Barrett Lydgate, E, ‘The EU, the WTO and Indirect Land-Use Change’ (2013) 47 Journal of World Trade, 159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, L, ‘Article XX of GATT and the Problem of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: The Case of Trade Measures for the Protection of Human Rights’ (2002) 36 Journal of World Trade, 353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basaran, HR, ‘How Should Article 81 EC Address Agreements that Yield Environmental Benefits’, (2006) 9 European Competition Law Review, 479Google Scholar
Bayefsky, AF, ‘Cultural Sovereignty, Relativism, and International Human Rights: New Excuses for Old Strategies’ (1996) 9 Ratio Juris, 42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beqiraj, J, ‘The Delicate Equilibrium of EU Trade Measures: The Seals Case’ (2013) 14 German Law Journal, 279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, S and Cashore, B, ‘Can Non-State Global Governance Be Legitimate? An Analytical Framework’ [2007] Regulation & Governance, 347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwati, J, ‘After Seattle: Free Trade and the WTO’ in Roger, B, Porter, Jagdish and others (eds.), Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy: the Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium (Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2001), 50Google Scholar
Black, J, ‘Constitutionalising Self-Regulation’ (1996) 59 The Modern Law Review, 24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodansky, D, ‘What’s So Bad about Unilateral Action to Protect the Environment?’ (2000) 11 European Journal of International Law, 339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boedeltje, M and Cornips, J, ‘Input and Output Legitimacy in Interactive Governance’ (No. NIG2-01) NIG Annual Work Conference 2004 RotterdamGoogle Scholar
Bogaert, S, ‘Horizontality: The Court Attacks?’ in Barnard, Catherine and Scott, Joanne (eds.), The Law of the Single European Market: Unpacking the Premises (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2002), 123Google Scholar
Bonroy, O and Constantatos, C, ‘On the Use of Labels in Credence Goods Markets’ (2008) 33 Journal of Regulatory Economics, 237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bork, RH, The Antitrust Paradox. A Policy at War with Itself (New York: Basic Books, 1978)Google Scholar
Bronckers, M, ‘The Relationship of the EC Courts with other International Tribunals: Non-Comittal, Respectful or Submissive?’ (2007) 44 Common Market Law Review, 601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, C, ‘Case C-112/00, Eugen Schmidberger, Internationale Transporte und Planzüge v. Austria’ (2003) 40 Common Market Law Review, 1499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brus, M, ‘Case C-510/99, Procureur de la République v. Xavier Tridon’ (2003) 40 Common Market Law Review, 169Google Scholar
Camm, T and Bowles, D, ‘Animal Welfare and the Treaty of Rome-Legal Analysis of the Protocol on Animal Welfare and Welfare Standards in the European Union’ (2000) 12 Journal of Environmental Law, 197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caporaso, JA, ‘International Relations Theory and Multilateralism: The Search for Foundations’ (1992) 46 International Organization, 599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey, D, ‘Disintegration: Environmental Protection and Article 81 EC’ (2009) 15 European Law Journal, 362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castaldo, S, Perrini, F, Misani, N and Tencati, A, ‘The Missing Link Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumer Trust: The Case of Fair Trade Products’ (2009) 84 Journal of Business Ethics 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, D, Davies, G, and Monti, G, European Union Law; Cases and Materials, 2nd edn, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, H, ‘An Economic Analysis of Trade Measures to Protect the Global Environment’ (1995) 83 Georgetown Law Journal, 4Google Scholar
Charnovitz, S, ‘Free Trade, Fair Trade, Green Trade: Defogging the Debate’ (1994) 27 Cornell International Law Journal, 459Google Scholar
Charnovitz, S, ‘The Law of Environmental PPMs in the WTO: Debunking the Myth of Illegality’ (2002) 27 The Yale Journal of International Law, 59Google Scholar
Cornish, W, Intellectual Property: Omnipresent, Distracting, Irrelevant? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damjanovic, D, ‘The EU Market Rules as Social Market Rules: Why the EU can be a Social Market Economy’ (2013) 50 Common Market Law Review, 1685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darby, M and Karni, E, ‘Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud’ (1973) 16 Journal of Law and Economics, 67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, G, ‘Freedom of Movement, Horizontal Effect, and Freedom of Contract’ [2012] European Review of Private Law, 805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, G, ‘Is Mutual Recognition an Alternative to Harmonisation: Lessons on Trade and Tolerance of Diversity from the EU’ in Bartels, Lorand and Ortino, Federico (eds.), Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006) 265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, G, ‘Process and Production Method Based Restrictions on Trade in the EU’ in Barnard, C. (ed.), Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 2007–2008 (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008), 69Google Scholar
de Mars, S, ‘The Limits of General Principles: A Procurement Case Study’ (2013) 38 European Law Review, 316Google Scholar
de Sadeleer, N, ‘Environmental Governance and the Legal Bases Conundrum’ (2012) 31 Yearbook of European Law, 373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Sadeleer, N, EU Environmental Law and the Internal Market (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
de Vries, S, ‘Case C–470/03, A.G.M.–COS.MET Srl v. Suomen valtio, Tarmo Lehtinen’ (2008) 45 Common Market Law Review, 56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Witte, B, ‘Non-market Values in Internal Market Legislation’ in Shuibhne, Niamh Nic (ed.), Regulating the Internal Market (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2006), 61Google Scholar
de Witte, F, ‘Sex, Drugs & EU Law: The Recognition of Moral and Ethical Diversity in EU Law’ (2013) 50 Common Market Law Review, 1545, 1553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhondt, N, Integration of Environmental Protection into Other EC Policies: Legal Theory and Practice (Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2003)Google Scholar
Dougan, M, ‘Minimum Harmonization and the Internal Market’ (2000) 37 Common Market Law Review, 853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doukas, D, ‘Untying the Market Access Knot: Advertising Restrictions and the Free Movement of Goods and Services’ (2007) 9 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dragos, D and Neamtu, B, ‘Sustainable Public Procurement: Life-Cycle Costing in the New EU Directive Proposal’ [2013] European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drijber, BJ and Stergiou, H, ‘Public Procurement Law and Internal Market Law’ (2009) 46 Common Market Law Review, 805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, G, ‘Paternalism’ in Wasserstrom, R A (ed.), Morality and the Law (Belmont: Wadsworth, 1971)Google Scholar
Eeckhout, P, EU External Relations Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enchelmaier, S, ‘Article 36: General’ in Oliver, P (ed.), Oliver on Free Movement of Goods in the European Union (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010), 215Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, PF, ‘“Morality” May Not Be Enough to Justify the EU Seal Products Ban: Animal Welfare Meets International Trade Law’ (2011) 14 Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy, 85–136Google Scholar
Fridell, M, Hudson, I and Hudson, M, ‘With Friends Like These: The Corporate Response to Fair Trade Coffee’ (2008) 40 Review of Radical Political Economics, 8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, SE, ‘Processes and Production Methods: How to Produce Sound Policy for Environmental PPM-Based Trade Measures?’ (2002) 27 Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 383Google Scholar
Gale, F and Haward, M, Global Commodity Governance: State Responses to Sustainable Forest and Fisheries Certification (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geraerts, D and Natens, B, ‘The WTO Consistency of the European Union Timber Regulation’ (2014) 48 Journal of World Trade, 433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerbrandy, A, ‘Competition Law and Private-Sector Sustainability Initiatives’ in Colombi Ciacchi, A.L.B. and others (eds.), Law & Governance – Beyond the Public-Private Divide? (The Hague: Eleven International Publishing, 2013), 81–103Google Scholar
Gormley, L, ‘Competition and Free Movement: Is the Internal Market the Same as a Common Market?’ [2002] European Business Law Review, 517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gormley, L, ‘Reasoning Renounced? The Remarkable Judgment in Keck & Mithouard’ [1994] European Business Law Review, 63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gormley, L, ‘Silver Threads among the Gold … 50 Years of the Free Movement of Goods’ (2007) 31 Fordham International Law Journal, 1637Google Scholar
Haas, E B, The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces, 1950–57 (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1958)Google Scholar
Habermas, J, The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Harbo, TI, ‘The Function of the Proportionality Principle in EU law’ (2010) 16 European Law Journal, 158, 185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrems, N, ‘The Leghold Trap Regulation and Potential Pitfalls during the Dutch Presidency of the EU’ (1998) European Environmental Law Review, 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, D, A brief history of neoliberalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haufler, V, ‘The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme: An Innovation in Global Governance and Conflict Prevention’ (2010) 89 Journal of Business Ethics, 403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedemann-Robinson, M, ‘Defending the Consumer’s Right to a Clean Environment in the Face of Globalisation. The Case of Extraterritorial Environmental Protection under European Community Law’ (2000) 23 Journal of Consumer Policy, 25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertel, M, ‘Climate-Change-Related Trade Measures and Article XX: Defining Discrimination in Light of the Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibilities’ (2011) 45 Journal of World Trade, 653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hojnik, J, ‘Free Movement of Goods in a Labyrinth: Can Buy Irish Survive the Crises?’ (2012) 49 Common Market Law Review, 291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horsley, T, ‘Unearthing Buried Treasure: Art 34 TFEU and the Exclusionary Rules,’ (2012) 37(6) European Law Review, 737Google Scholar
Howse, R and Langille, J, ‘Permitting Pluralism: The Seal Products Dispute and Why the WTO Should Accept Trade Restrictions Justified by Noninstrumental Moral Values’ (2012) 37 Yale Journal of International Law, 367Google Scholar
Howse, R and Regan, D, ‘The Product/Process Distinction: An Illusory Basis for Disciplining Unilateralism in Trade Policy’ (2000) 11 European Journal of International Law, 249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, JH, The World Trading System: Law and Policy of International Economic Relations 2nd edn (Cambridge, MIT Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Jans, JH, ‘Stop the Integration Principle?’ (2009–2010) 33 Fordham International Law Journal, 1533Google Scholar
Jans, JH and Vedder, HHB, European Environmental Law (Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2008)Google Scholar
Jansen, B, ‘The Limits of Unilateralism from a European Perspective’ (2000) 11 European Journal of International Law, 309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, MA, ‘Case C-325/00, Commission v. Germany, Judgment of the Court of Justice of 5 November 2002. Full Court’ (2003) 40 Common Market Law Review, 71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A, ‘Regulating the Legal Profession: Article 81, the Public Interest and the ECJ’s Judgment in Wouters’ (2008) 19 European Business Law Review, 1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kieran, F, ‘A Separation of Powers Approach to Non-efficiency Goals in EU Competition Law’ (2013) 19 European Public Law, 189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingston, S, Greening EU Competition Law and Policy (Cambridge University Press, 2012)Google Scholar
Kingston, S, ‘Integrating Environmental Protection and EU Competition Law: Why Competition Isn’t Special’ (2010) 16 European Law Journal, 780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjølbye, L, ‘The New Commission Guidelines on the Application of Article 81 (3): an Economic Approach to Article 81’ (2004) 25 European Competition Law Review, 566Google Scholar
Komninos, AP, ‘Non-competition Concerns: Resolution of Conflicts in the Integrated Article 81 EC’ (2008) The University of Oxford Centre for Competition Law and Policy Working Paper (L) 08/05Google Scholar
Krämer, L, ‘Sustainable Development in EC Law’ in Bugge, H and Voigt, C (eds.), Sustainable Development in International and National Law (Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2008)Google Scholar
Krenn, C, ‘A Missing Piece in the Horizontal Effect “Jigsaw”: Horizontal Direct Effect and the Free Movement of Goods’ (2012) 49 Common Market Law Review, 177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kröger, J, ‘Nationally Exclusive Support Schemes for RES Electricity Production and the Free Movement of Goods’ (2013) 10 Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, 378–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuijper, PJ and Bronckers, M, ‘WTO Law in the European Court of Justice’ (2005) 42 Common Market Law Review, 1313Google Scholar
Kulovesi, K, Morgera, E and Muñoz, M, ‘Environmental Integration and Multi-faceted International Dimensions of EU Law: Unpacking the EU’s 2009 Climate and Energy Package’ (2011) 48 Common Market Law Review, 829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunzlik, P, ‘From Suspect Practice to Market-Based Instrument: Policy Alignment and the Evolution of EU Law’s Approach to “green” Public Procurement’ [2013] Public Procurement Law Review, 97Google Scholar
Laïdi, Z, La norme sans la force: L’énigme de la puissance européenne, 2nd edn (Paris: Les Presses de Sciences Po, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, ATF, ‘Reconstructing Embedded Liberalism: John Gerard Ruggie and Constructivist Approaches to the Study of the International Trade Regime’ (2006) 9 Journal of International Economic Law, 81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levashova, Y, ‘How Effective is the New EU Timber Regulation in the Fight against Illegal Logging?’(2011) 20 Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohse, EJ, ‘Fundamental Freedoms and Private Actors – Towards an “Indirect Horizontal Effect”’ 13 (2007) European Public Law, 159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loozen, E, ‘Professional Ethics and Restraints of Competition’ [2006] European Law Review, 28Google Scholar
Loureiro, ML and Lotade, J, ‘Do Fair Trade and Eco-Labels in Coffee Wake up the Consumer Conscience?’ (2005) 53 Ecological Economics, 129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, R and O’Gorman, R, ‘A Cock and Bull Story? – Problems with the Protection of Animal Welfare in EU Law and Some Proposed Solutions’ (2008) 20 Journal of Environmental Law, 363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lugard, P and Hancher, L, ‘Honey, I Shrunk the Article! A Critical Assessment of the Commission’s Notice on Article 81(3) of the EC Treaty’ (2004) 25 European Competition Law Review, 410Google Scholar
Lupton, S, ‘Shared Quality Uncertainty and the Introduction of Indeterminate Goods’ (2005) 29 Cambridge Journal of Economics, 399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maduro, MP, We the Court: the European Court of Justice and the European economic constitution: a critical reading of Article 30 of the EC Treaty (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998)Google Scholar
Manners, I, ‘Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’ (2002) 40 Journal of Common Market Studies, 235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martens, M and de Margerie, S, ‘The Link to the Subject-Matter of the Contract in Green and Social Procurement’ [2013] European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review, 8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsushita, M, Schonebaum, TJ and Mavroidis, PC (eds.), The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice And Policy (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2006) 808Google Scholar
Mattera, A, ‘L’ article 30 du traité CEE, la jurisprudence «Cassis de Dijon» et le principle de la reconnaissaince mutuelle’ [1992] Revue du Marché Unique Européen, 13Google Scholar
Mattera, A, ‘Principle of Mutual Recognition and Respect for National, Regional and Local Identities and Traditions’ in Kostoris, Fiorella and Schioppa, Padoa (eds.), The Principle of Mutual Recognition in the European Integration Process (Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005)Google Scholar
Mena, S and Palazzo, G, ‘Input and Output Legitimacy of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives’ (2012) 22 Business Ethics Quarterly, 527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micheletti, M, Political Virtue and Shopping: Individuals, Consumerism, and Collective Action (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moïsé, E and Steenblik, R, ‘Trade-Related Measures Based on Processes and Production Methods in the Context of Climate-Change Mitigation’, (2011) OECD Trade and Environment Working Papers, 2011/04Google Scholar
Monti, G, ‘Article 81 EC and Public Policy’ (2002) 39 Common Market Law Review 1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monti, G, ‘EU Competition Law from Rome to Lisbon – Social Market Economy’ in Heide-Jorgensen, Caroline, Bergqvist, Christian, Neergaard, Ulla & Poulsen, Sune Troels (eds.), Aims and Values in Competition Law (Kopenhagen: DJØF Publishing, 2013), 27Google Scholar
Mortelmans, K, ‘Towards Convergence in the Application of the Rules on Free Movement and on Competition?’ (2001) 38 Common Market Law Review, 613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munoz, R, ‘Case C-1/96, The Queen v. Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and food, ex parte Compassion in World Farming Limited. Judgment of 19 March 1998, [1998] ECR I-1251’ (1999) 36 Common Market Law Review, 831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicoaïdis, K and Howse, R, ‘“This is my EUtopia …”: Narrative as Power’ (2002) 40 Journal of Common Market Studies, 767–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nocolaides, P, ‘The Balancing Myth: The Economics of Article 81 (1) and (3)’ (2005) 32 Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nollkaemper, A, ‘The Legality of Moral Crusades Disguised in Trade Laws: An Analysis of the EC “Ban” on Furs from Aimals taken by Leghold Traps’ (1996) 8 Journal of Environmental Law, 237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Notaro, N, ‘The New Generation Case Law on Trade and Environmnent’ (2000) 25 European Law Review, 467Google Scholar
Obradovic, D, Alonso Vizcaino, JM, ‘Good Governance Requirements Concerning the Participation of Interest Groups in EU Consultations’ (2006) 43 Common Market Law Review, 1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odudu, O, The Boundaries of EC Competition Law: The Scope of Article 81 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odudu, O, ‘The Wider Concerns of Competition Law’ (2010) 30 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogus, A, ‘The Paradoxes of Legal Paternalism and How to Resolve Them’ (2010) 30 Legal Studies, 61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, P (ed.), Oliver on Free Movement of Goods in the European Union (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2010)Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) ‘Processes and Production Methods (PPMs): Conceptual Framework and Considerations’ (OECD 1997)Google Scholar
Partiti, E, ‘The Appellate Body Report in US – Tuna II and Its Impact on Eco-Labelling and Standardization’ (2013) 40 Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, J, ‘Carbon Leakage Measures and Border Tax Ajdustments under WTO Law’ in Prevost, Denise and van Calster, Geert (eds.), Research Handbook on Environment Helath and the WTO (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012)Google Scholar
Pijnacker Hordijk, EH, ‘Oordeel over verenigbaarheid van verbod van invoer en verhandeling van uitheemse vogelsoorten met art. 36 EEG-Verdrag en Richtlijn inzake het behoud van de vogelstand’ [1991] Sociaal-Economische Wetgeving, 261Google Scholar
Pirker, B, Proportionality Analysis and Models of Judicial Review: A Theoretical and Comparative Study (Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2013)Google Scholar
Polanyi, K, The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (2nd edn, Beacon Press 2001)Google Scholar
Pollack, MA, ‘Unilateral America, Multilateral Europe?’ in Peterson, John and Pollack, Mark A. (eds.), Europe, America, Bush: Transatlantic Relations in the Twenty-first Century (London: Routledge, 2003), 115Google Scholar
Roe, B and Sheldon, I, ‘Credence Good Labeling: The Efficiency and Distributional Implications of Several Policy Approaches’ (2007) 89 American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romppanen, S, ‘Regulating Better Biofuels for the European Union’ [2012] European Energy and Environmental Law Review, 123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenboom, N, ‘How does article 101(3) TFEU case law relate to EC guidelines and the welfare perspective?’ (2013) SEO Working PaperGoogle Scholar
Roth, WH, ‘Case C-205/07, Lodewijk Gysbrechts, Santurel Inter BVBA, Judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 16 December 2008’ (2010) 47 Common Market Law Review, 509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, JG, ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’ (1982) 36 International Organization, 379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, JG, Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights (New York: Norton & Company, 2013)Google Scholar
Ryland, D and Nurse, A, ‘Mainstreaming after Lisbon: Advancing Animal Welfare in the EU Internal Market’ [2013] European Energy and Environmental Law Review, 101Google Scholar
Ryngaert, C, Jurisdiction in International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sands, P, ‘“Unilateralism”, Values, and International Law’ (2000) 11 European Journal of International Law, 291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauter, W and Schepel, H, State and Market in European Union Law: The Public and Private Spheres of the Internal Market before the EU Courts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, FW, Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schepel, H, ‘Case C-171/11 Fra.bo Spa v Deutsche Vereinigung des Gas- und Wasserfaches’ 9 (2013) European Review of Contract Law, 186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schepel, H, ‘Constitutionalising the Market, Marketising the Constitution, and to Tell the Difference: On the Horizontal Application of the Free Movement Provisions in EU Law’ 18 (2012) European Law Journal, 177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schepel, H, ‘The New Approach to the New Approach: The Juridification of Harmonized Standards in EU Law’ 20 (2013) Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schepel, H, ‘Private Regulators in Law’ in Pauwelyn, Joost, Wessel, Ramses, and Wouters, Jan (eds.), Informal International Lawmaking (Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online, 2013), 356Google Scholar
Scherer, G and Palazzo, G (eds.), Handbook of Research on Global Corporate Citizenship (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing 2008), 249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiff Berman, P, ‘Global Legal Pluralism’ (2007) 80 Southern California Law Review, 1155Google Scholar
Schütze, R, ‘Supremacy without Pre-emption? The Very Slowly Emergent Doctrine of Community Pre-emption’ (2006) 43 Common Market Law Review, 1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J, ‘Extraterritoriality and Territorial Extension in EU Law’ (2014) 62 The American Journal of Comparative Law, 87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J, ‘The Multi-level Governance of Climate Change’ in Craig, Paul (ed.), The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 805Google Scholar
Scott, J, ‘The New EU “extraterritoriality”’ (2014) 51 Common Market Law Review, 1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sevenster, H, Eco-imperialisme binnen de Europese Unie; een juridisch probleem? (Deventer: W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink, 1998)Google Scholar
Shuibhne, NN and Maci, M, ‘Proving Public Interest: The Growing Impact of Evidence in Free Movement Case Law’ (2013) 50 Common Market Law Review, 965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, J, Goods and Services in EC Law: A Study of the Relationship between the Freedoms (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spar, DL and La Mure, LT, ‘The Power of Activism: Assessing the Impact of NGOs on Global Business’(2003) 45 California Management Review, 78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinrücken, T and Jaenichen, S, ‘The Fair Trade Idea: Towards an Economics of Social Labels’ (2007) 30 Journal of Consumer Policy, 201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolze, M and Lampkin, N, ‘Policy for Organic Farming: Rationale and Concepts’ (2009) 34 Food Policy, 237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temple Lang, J, ‘The Development by the Court of Justice of the Duties of Cooperation of National Authorities and Community Institutions under Article 10 EC’ (2007–2008) 31 Fordham International Law Journal, 1483Google Scholar
Thaler, RH and Sunstein, CR, Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
The American Law Institute, Restatement (third) of Foreign Relations Law (The American Law Institute 1987)Google Scholar
Trebilcock, M, Howse R and Eliason A eds, The Regulation of International Trade, 4th edn (London: Routledge, 2013)Google Scholar
Van Calster, G, ‘Export Restrictions – A Watershed for Article 30’ (2000) 25 European Law Review, 335Google Scholar
Van Calster, G, International & EU Trade Law: The Environmental Challenge (London: Cameron May, 2000)Google Scholar
van Eijndthoven, J, ‘Energy Taxation at European Level: What does it do for the Environment and Sustainability?’ [2011] EC Tax Review, 283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Hoek, A, ‘Het proces tegen Shell wegens olielekkages in de Ogonidelta (Nigeria)’ (2013) 62 Ars Aequi, 482Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, B, ‘From Status to Impact, and the Role of National Legislation: The Application of Article 34 TFEU to a Private Certification Organisation in Fra.bo’ [2013] European Journal of Risk Regulation, 405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vedder, H, Competition Law and Environmental Protection in Europe: Towards Sustainability? (Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2003)Google Scholar
Vogel, D, ‘The Private Regulation of Global Corporate Conduct’ (2010) 49 Business & Society, 68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, D, ‘Trading up and Governing Across: Transnational Governance and Environmental Protection’ (1997) 4 Journal of European Public Policy, 556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vranes, E, Trade and the Environment: Fundamental Issues in International Law, WTO Law, and Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasmeier, M, ‘The Integration of Environmental Protection as a General Rule for Interpreting Community Law’ (2001) 38 Common Market Law Review, 159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, JHH, ‘In the Face of Crisis: Input Legitimacy, Output Legitimacy and the Political Messianism of European Integration’ (2012) 34 Journal of European Integration, 825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, JHH, ‘Mutual Recognition, Functional Equivalence and Harmonization in the Evolution of the European Common Market and the WTO’ in Kostoris, Fiorella and Schioppa, Padoa (eds.), The Principle of Mutual Recognition in the European Integration Process (Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), 25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiers, J, Trade and Environment in the EC and the WTO: a Legal Analysis (Groningen: Europa Law Publishing, 2002)Google Scholar
Wiesbrock, A, ‘An Obligation for Sustainable Procurement? Gauging the Potential Impact of Article 11 TFEU on Public Contracting in the EU’ (2013) 40 Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, AC, ‘Public Policy Goals under EU Competition Law: now is the Time to set the House in Order’ (2012) 8 European Competition Journal, 443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C, ‘Tacking Conflict Diamonds: The Kimberley Process Certification Scheme’ (2004) 11 International Peacekeeping, 697CrossRefGoogle Scholar