Book contents
- Great Christian Jurists and Legal Collections in the First Millennium
- Law and Christianity
- Great Christian Jurists and Legal Collections in the First Millennium
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Part I
- 1 Normative Texts and Practices of the First Millennium
- 2 The Many Voices of Roman Law
- 3 The Law of the Post-Roman Kingdoms
- 4 Ecclesiastical Councils
- 5 The Papacy
- 6 The Sacred Palace, Public Penance, and the Carolingian Polity1
- 7 Canonical Collections
- 8 The Practice and Literature of Penance
- 9 Monastic Rules
- Part II
- Index
- References
9 - Monastic Rules
from Part I
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 June 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- Great Christian Jurists and Legal Collections in the First Millennium
- Law and Christianity
- Great Christian Jurists and Legal Collections in the First Millennium
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Part I
- 1 Normative Texts and Practices of the First Millennium
- 2 The Many Voices of Roman Law
- 3 The Law of the Post-Roman Kingdoms
- 4 Ecclesiastical Councils
- 5 The Papacy
- 6 The Sacred Palace, Public Penance, and the Carolingian Polity1
- 7 Canonical Collections
- 8 The Practice and Literature of Penance
- 9 Monastic Rules
- Part II
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter critically reviews and complicates three premises of the standard historiography of early-medieval monasticism: monastic life turned at an early stage into a “regular life,” lived according to a written rule; the practice of following a normative written rule was stable, not subject to much historical change; there was an organic evolution that culminated in the implementing of the Rule of Benedict as the unifying norm for monastic life in the context of Carolingian monastic reforms. The chapter complicates these notions on the basis of four case studies: the “angelic Rule” of Pachomius and its role in creating a monastic origin myth; the sancta regula of Caesarius as a way to achieve collective sanctity; the Regula Columbani as a program to unify a monastic movement; and the Regula Benedicti in its two manifestations: as a document revealing a late-antique attempt to organize an ascetic community; and as a Carolingian instrument of reform. Monastic rules are not only different in their content and in their disciplinary program, but each of them carries a different understanding of normativity and a distinctive idea of what the term “rule” (regula) really means.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Sources
Ardo, Vita Benedicti Anianensis. Ed. Waitz, G., MGH Scriptores (in Folio) 15.1 (1887), 198–220. [English translation by Allen Cabaniss in Noble, Thomas F. X. and Head, Thomas (eds.), Soldiers of Christ. Saints and Saints’ Lives from Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995), 213–54.]Google Scholar
Aurelianus of Arles, Regula ad monachos. Ed. Schmidt, Albert, “Zur Komposition der Mönchsregel des heiligen Aurelian von Arles,” Studia Monastica 17 (1975): 237–56.Google Scholar
Benedict of Aniane, Codex Regularum, PL 103 (selections). [See also Codex Regularum des Benedikt von Aniane: Faksimile der Handschrift Clm 28118 der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek München, ed. Engelbert, Pius (Sankt Ottilien: EOS Editions, 2016).]Google Scholar
Benedict of Aniane, Concordia Regularum. CCM 168 A (1999).Google Scholar
Boon, Amand. Pachomiana Latina. Règle et épitres de S. Pachome, épitre de S. Théodore et “liber” de S. Orsiesius. Leuven: Bureaux de la Revue, 1932.Google Scholar
Caesarius of Arles, Oeuvres Monastiques. Ed. de Vogüé, A. and Courreau, J., SC 345 and 398 (1988, 1994).Google Scholar
Caesarius of Arles, Regula ad virgines. Ed. de Vogüé, A. and Courreau, J., SC 345 (1988), 170–272. [English translation by McCarthy, Maria C., The Rule for Nuns of St. Caesarius of Arles: A Translation with a Critical Introduction (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1960).]Google Scholar
Columbanus, Regula monachorum and Regula coenobialis. Ed. and trans. Walker, G. S. M., Columbani opera (Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, 1957), 122–69.Google Scholar
Dionysius Exiguus, Vita Pachomii. Ed. van Cranenburgh, H., La Vie Latine de Saint Pachôme. Brussels: Societé des Bollandistes, 1969.Google Scholar
Halkin, François. Sancti Pachomii Vitae Graecae. Brussels: Societé des Bollandistes, 1932.Google Scholar
Jonas of Bobbio, Vita Columbani. Ed. Krusch, Bruno, MGH Scritpores rerum Germanicarum in usum scholarum separatim editi 37 (1905). [English translation by Ian Wood and Alexander O’Hara, Jonas of Bobbio Life of Columbanus, Life of John of Réomé, and Life of Vedast, Translated Texts for Historians (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2016).]Google Scholar
Mordek, Hubert, and Reynolds, Roger E.. “Bischof Leodegar und das Konzil von Autun.” In Mordek, H. (ed.), Aus Archiven und Bibliotheken. Festschrift für Raymund Kottje zum 65. Geburtstag (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1992), 71–92.Google Scholar
Regula Benedicti. Ed. Jean Neufville and Adalbert de Vogüé. SC 181 and 182 (1971, 1972).Google Scholar
Regula Donati. Ed. Victoria Zimmerl-Panagl, CSEL 98 (2015).Google Scholar
Regula Eugipii. Ed. Fernando Villégas and Adalbert de Vogüé. CSEL 87 (1976).Google Scholar
Regula magistri. Ed. Adalbert de Vogüé. SC 105 and 106 (1964, 1965).Google Scholar
Veilleux, Amand. Pachomian Koinonia, vol. 1. Kalamazoo: Cistercian Publications, 1980.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Agamben, Giorgio. The Highest Poverty: Monastic Rules and Form-of-Life. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Choy, Renie S. Intercessory Prayer and the Monastic Ideal in the Time of the Carolingian Reforms. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Dartmann, Christoph. “Normative Schriftlichkeit im früheren Mittelalter: das benediktinische Mönchtum.” ZRG Kan. Abt. 100 (2004): 1–61Google Scholar
De Jong, Mayke. “Carolingian Monasticism: The Power of Prayer.” In McKitterick, Rosamond (ed.), The New Cambridge Medieval History, vol. 2: c. 700–c. 900 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), 622–53, 995–1002.Google Scholar
Dey, Hendrik, and Fentress, Elizabeth (eds.). Western Monasticism ante litteram. The Spaces of Monastic Observance in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. Disciplina Monastica 8. Turnhout: Brepols, 2011.Google Scholar
Diem, Albrecht. “Columbanian Monastic Rules: Dissent and Experiment.” In Flechner, R. and Meeder, S. (eds.), The Irish in Early Medieval Europe: Identity, Culture and Religion (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016), 68–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-->Diem, Albrecht. “The Carolingians and the Regula Benedicti.” In van Espelo, D. et al. (eds.), Religious Franks Religion and Power in the Frankish Kingdoms: Studies in Honour of Mayke de Jong (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2016), 243–61.Google Scholar
-->Diem, Albrecht. “… ut si professus fuerit se omnia impleturum, tunc excipiatur. Observations on the Rules for Monks and Nuns of Caesarius and Aurelianus of Arles.” In Zimmerl-Panagl, V. et al. (eds.), Edition und Erforschung lateinischer patristischer Texte (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014), 191–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-->Diem, Albrecht. “Die ‘Regula Columbani’ und die ‘Regula Sancti Galli’. Überlegungen zu den Gallusviten in ihrem karolingischen Kontext.” In Schnoor, Franziska et al. (eds.), Gallus und seine Zeit. Leben, Wirken, Nachleben (St. Gallen: Verlag am Klosterhof, 2015), 65–97.Google Scholar
-->Diem, Albrecht. “Inventing the Holy Rule: Some Observations on the History of Monastic Normative Observance in the Early Medieval West.” In Dey, H. and Fentress, E. (eds.), Western Monasticism ante litteram: The Spaces of Monastic Observance in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages, Disciplina Monastica 8 (Turnhout: Brepols, 2011), 53–84.Google Scholar
Diem, Albrecht. “Was bedeutet Regula Columbani?” In Diesenberger, M. and Pohl, W. (eds.), Integration und Herrschaft. Ethnische Identitäten und soziale Organisation im Frühmittelalter (Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2002), 63–89.Google Scholar
Diem, Albrecht, and Rousseau, Philip. “Monastic Rules, 4th–9th c.” in Beach, Alison and Cochelin, Isabelle (eds.), The Cambridge History of Western Medieval Monasticism, vol. 1 (in press).Google Scholar
Hallinger, Kassius, “Papst Gregor der Große und der hl. Benedikt.” In Steidle, B. (ed.), Commentationes in Regulam S. Benedicti (Rome: Herder, 1957), 231–319.Google Scholar
Schulenburg, Jane Tibbetts. “Strict Active Enclosure and Its Effects on the Female Monastic Experience (ca. 500–1100).” In Nichols, J. A. and Shank, L. T. (eds.), Medieval Religious Women, vol. 1: Distant Echoes (Kalamazoo: Cistercian Publications, 1984), 51–86.Google Scholar
Semmler, Josef. “Benedictus II: una regula – una consuetudo.” In Lourdaux, W. and Verhelst, D. (eds.), Benedictine Culture 750–1050 (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1983), 1–49.Google Scholar