Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-9f2xs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-04T00:27:48.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CHAPTER FIVE - Production changes in response to climate change

from Part I - Grassland dynamics and climate change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2019

By
Lauchlan H. Fraser
Edited by
David J. Gibson  and
Jonathan A. Newman
David J. Gibson
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University, Carbondale
Jonathan A. Newman
Affiliation:
University of Guelph, Ontario
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Grasslands and Climate Change , pp. 82 - 97
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

5.9 References

White, RP, Murray, S, Rohweder, M. Pilot analysis of global ecosystems: grassland ecosystems. Washington, DC: FAO; 2000.Google Scholar
Borer, ET, Grace, JB, Harpole, WS, MacDougall, AS, Seabloom, EW. A decade of insights into grassland ecosystem responses to global environmental change. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 2017;1(5):0118.Google Scholar
Jones, DL, Hodge, A, Kuzyakov, Y. Plant and mycorrhizal regulation of rhizodeposition. New Phytologist. 2004;163(3):459–80.Google Scholar
Parton, WJ, Scurlock, JMO, Ojima, DS, Gilmanov, TG, Scholes, RJ, Schimel, DS, et al. Observations and modeling of biomass and soil organic matter dynamics for the grassland biome worldwide. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 1993;7(4):785–809.Google Scholar
Parton, WJ, Scurlock, JMO, Ojima, DS, Schimel, DS, Hall, DO. Impact of climate change on grassland production and soil carbon worldwide. Global Change Biology. 1995;1(1):13–22.Google Scholar
Fraser, LH, Harrower, WL, Garris, HW, Davidson, S, Hebert, PDN, Howie, R, et al. A call for applying trophic structure in ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology. 2015;23(5):503–7.Google Scholar
Fraser, LH, Pither, J, Jentsch, A, Sternberg, M, Zobel, M, Askarizadeh, D, et al. Worldwide evidence of a unimodal relationship between productivity and plant species richness. Science. 2015;349(6245):302–5.Google Scholar
Haddad, NM, Haarstad, J, Tilman, D. The effects of long-term nitrogen loading on grassland insect communities. Oecologia. 2000;124(1):73–84.Google Scholar
Beier, C, Beierkuhnlein, C, Wohlgemuth, T, Penuelas, J, Emmett, B, Körner, C, et al. Precipitation manipulation experiments – challenges and recommendations for the future. Ecology Letters. 2012;15(8):899–911.Google Scholar
Huxman, TE, Smith, MD, Fay, PA, Knapp, AK, Shaw, MR, Loik, ME, et al. Convergence across biomes to a common rain-use efficiency. Nature. 2004;429(6992):651.Google Scholar
IPCC. Synthesis report. In: Pachauri, RK, Meyer, LA, editors. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Core Writing Team. Geneva: Cambridge University Press; 2014.Google Scholar
Smith, SD, Huxman, TE, Zitzer, SF, Charlet, TN, Housman, DC, Coleman, JS, et al. Elevated CO2 increases productivity and invasive species success in an arid ecosystem. Nature. 2000;408(6808):79.Google Scholar
Vitousek, PM, Mooney, HA, Lubchenco, J, Melillo, JM. Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science. 1997;277(5325):494–9.Google Scholar
Carpenter, SR, Mooney, HA, Agard, J, Capistrano, D, DeFries, RS, Díaz, S, et al. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2009;106(5):1305–12.Google Scholar
Knapp, AK, Beier, C, Briske, DD, Classen, AT, Luo, Y, Reichstein, M, et al. Consequences of more extreme precipitation regimes for terrestrial ecosystems. Bioscience. 2008;58(9):811–21.Google Scholar
Shaver, GR, Canadell, J, Chapin, FS, Gurevitch, J, Harte, J, Henry, G, et al. Global warming and terrestrial ecosystems: a conceptual framework for analysis. Bioscience. 2000;50(10):871–82.Google Scholar
Smith, MD, Knapp, AK, Collins, SL. A framework for assessing ecosystem dynamics in response to chronic resource alterations induced by global change. Ecology. 2009;90(12):3279–89.Google Scholar
Pan, S, Tian, H, Dangal, SRS, Ouyang, Z, Tao, B, Ren, W, et al. Modeling and monitoring terrestrial primary production in a changing global environment: toward a multiscale synthesis of observation and simulation. Advances in Meteorology. 2014;2014:965936.Google Scholar
Carlyle, CN, Fraser, LH, Turkington, R. Response of grassland biomass production to simulated climate change and clipping along an elevation gradient. Oecologia. 2014;174(3):1065–73.Google Scholar
Henry, GHR, Molau, U. Tundra plants and climate change: the International Tundra Experiment (ITEX). Global Change Biology. 1997;3(S1):1–9.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, FA, Augustine, DJ, Brewer, P, von Fischer, JC. Nitrogen cycling and water pulses in semiarid grasslands: are microbial and plant processes temporally asynchronous? Oecologia. 2012;170(3):799–808.Google Scholar
Heisler-White, JL, Knapp, AK, Kelly, EF. Increasing precipitation event size increases aboveground net primary productivity in a semi-arid grassland. Oecologia. 2008;158(1):129–40.Google Scholar
Heisler‐White, JL, Blair, JM, Kelly, EF, Harmoney, K, Knapp, AK. Contingent productivity responses to more extreme rainfall regimes across a grassland biome. Global Change Biology. 2009;15(12):2894–904.Google Scholar
Yahdjian, L, Sala, OE. A rainout shelter design for intercepting different amounts of rainfall. Oecologia. 2002;133(2):95–101.Google Scholar
Esser, G. Implications of climate change for production and decomposition in grasslands and coniferous forests. Ecological Applications. 1992;2(1):47–54.Google Scholar
Gao, Q, Li, Y, Wan, Y, Qin, X, Jiangcun, W, Liu, Y. Dynamics of alpine grassland NPP and its response to climate change in Northern Tibet. Climatic Change. 2009;97(3–4):515.Google Scholar
Gao, Q, Zhu, W, Schwartz, MW, Ganjurjav, H, Wan, Y, Qin, X, et al. Climatic change controls productivity variation in global grasslands. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:26958.Google Scholar
Hall, DO, Scurlock, JMO. Climate change and productivity of natural grasslands. Annals of Botany. 1991;67(Suppl 1):49–55.Google Scholar
Thornley, JHM, Cannell, MGR. Temperate grassland responses to climate change: an analysis using the Hurley pasture model. Annals of Botany. 1997;80(2):205–21.Google Scholar
Hufkens, K, Keenan, TF, Flanagan, LB, Scott, RL, Bernacchi, CJ, Joo, E, et al. Productivity of North American grasslands is increased under future climate scenarios despite rising aridity. Nature Climate Change. 2016;6(7):710.Google Scholar
Moore, AD, Ghahramani, A. Climate change and broadacre livestock production across southern Australia. 1. Impacts of climate change on pasture and livestock productivity, and on sustainable levels of profitability.Global Change Biology. 2013;19(5):1440–55.Google Scholar
Fay, PA. Precipitation variability and primary productivity in water‐limited ecosystems: how plants ‘leverage’ precipitation to ‘finance’ growth. New Phytologist. 2009;181(1):5–8.Google Scholar
Knapp, AK, Avolio, ML, Beier, C, Carroll, CJW, Collins, SL, Dukes, JS, et al. Pushing precipitation to the extremes in distributed experiments: recommendations for simulating wet and dry years. Global Change Biology. 2017;23(5):1774–82.Google Scholar
Densmore-McCulloch, JA, Thompson, DL, Fraser, LH. Short-term effects of changing precipitation patterns on shrub–steppe grasslands: seasonal watering is more important than frequency of watering events. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(12):e0168663.Google Scholar
Knapp, AK, Fay, PA, Blair, JM, Collins, SL, Smith, MD, Carlisle, JD, et al. Rainfall variability, carbon cycling, and plant species diversity in a mesic grassland. Science. 2002;298(5601):2202–5.Google Scholar
Brookshire, ENJ, Weaver, T. Long-term decline in grassland productivity driven by increasing dryness. Nature Communications. 2015;6:7148.Google Scholar
Chen, G, Tian, H, Zhang, C, Liu, M, Ren, W, Zhu, W, et al. Drought in the southern United States over the 20th century: variability and its impacts on terrestrial ecosystem productivity and carbon storage. Climatic Change. 2012;114(2):379–97.Google Scholar
Cherwin, K, Knapp, A. Unexpected patterns of sensitivity to drought in three semi-arid grasslands. Oecologia. 2012;169(3):845–52.Google Scholar
Zeppel, MJ, Wilks, JV, Lewis, JD. Impacts of extreme precipitation and seasonal changes in precipitation on plants. Biogeosciences. 2014;11:3083–93.Google Scholar
Fay, PA, Carlisle, JD, Knapp, AK, Blair, JM, Collins, SL. Productivity responses to altered rainfall patterns in a C4-dominated grassland. Oecologia. 2003;137(2):245–51.Google Scholar
Guo, Q, Li, S, Hu, Z, Zhao, W, Yu, G, Sun, X, et al. Responses of gross primary productivity to different sizes of precipitation events in a temperate grassland ecosystem in Inner Mongolia, China. Journal of Arid Land. 2016;8(1):36–46.Google Scholar
Craine, JM. The importance of precipitation timing for grassland productivity. Plant Ecology. 2013;214(8):1085–9.Google Scholar
Craine, JM, Nippert, JB, Elmore, AJ, Skibbe, AM, Hutchinson, SL, Brunsell, NA. Timing of climate variability and grassland productivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2012;109(9):3401–5.Google Scholar
Copeland, SM, Harrison, SP, Latimer, AM, Damschen, EI, Eskelinen, AM, Fernandez‐Going, B, et al. Ecological effects of extreme drought on Californian herbaceous plant communities. Ecological Monographs. 2016;86(3):295–311.Google Scholar
Frank, DA. Drought effects on above- and belowground production of a grazed temperate grassland ecosystem. Oecologia. 2007;152(1):131–9.Google Scholar
Nippert, JB, Knapp, AK, Briggs, JM. Intra-annual rainfall variability and grassland productivity: can the past predict the future? Plant Ecology. 2006;184(1):65–74.Google Scholar
Holub, P, Fabšičová, M, Tůma, I, Záhora, J, Fiala, K. Effects of artificially varying amounts of rainfall on two semi‐natural grassland types. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2013;24(3):518–29.Google Scholar
Carlyle, CN, Fraser, LH, Turkington, R. Tracking soil temperature and moisture in a multi-factor climate experiment in temperate grassland: do climate manipulation methods produce their intended effects? Ecosystems. 2011;14(3):489–502.Google Scholar
Dengler, J, Janišová, M, Török, P, Wellstein, C. Biodiversity of Palaearctic grasslands: a synthesis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2014;182:1–14.Google Scholar
Grime, JP, Fridley, JD, Askew, AP, Thompson, K, Hodgson, JG, Bennett, CR. Long-term resistance to simulated climate change in an infertile grassland. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2008;105(29):10,028–32.Google Scholar
Jentsch, A, Kreyling, J, Elmer, M, Gellesch, E, Glaser, B, Grant, K, et al. Climate extremes initiate ecosystem‐regulating functions while maintaining productivity. Journal of Ecology. 2011;99(3):689–702.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D, Novoplansky, A. On the relative importance of competition in unproductive environments. Journal of Ecology. 1997;85(4):409–18.Google Scholar
Novoplansky, A, Goldberg, DE. Effects of water pulsing on individual performance and competitive hierarchies in plants. Journal of Vegetation Science. 2001;12(2):199–208.Google Scholar
Robertson, TR, Bell, CW, Zak, JC, Tissue, DT. Precipitation timing and magnitude differentially affect aboveground annual net primary productivity in three perennial species in a Chihuahuan Desert grassland. New Phytologist. 2009;181(1):230–42.Google Scholar
Gherardi, LA, Sala, OE. Enhanced precipitation variability decreases grass – and increases shrub – productivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2015;112(41):12,735–40.Google Scholar
Chelli, S, Canullo, R, Campetella, G, Schmitt, AO, Bartha, S, Cervellini, M, et al. The response of sub‐Mediterranean grasslands to rainfall variation is influenced by early season precipitation. Applied Vegetation Science. 2016;19(4):611–9.Google Scholar
Golodets, C, Sternberg, M, Kigel, J, Boeken, B, Henkin, Z, No’am, GS, et al. Climate change scenarios of herbaceous production along an aridity gradient: vulnerability increases with aridity. Oecologia. 2015;177(4):971–9.Google Scholar
Fay, PA, Kaufman, DM, Nippert, JB, Carlisle, JD, Harper, CW. Changes in grassland ecosystem function due to extreme rainfall events: implications for responses to climate change. Global Change Biology. 2008;14(7):1600–8.Google Scholar
Beierkuhnlein, C, Thiel, D, Jentsch, A, Willner, E, Kreyling, J. Ecotypes of European grass species respond differently to warming and extreme drought. Journal of Ecology. 2011;99(3):703–13.Google Scholar
Jentsch, A, Kreyling, J, Boettcher‐Treschkow, J, Beierkuhnlein, C. Beyond gradual warming: extreme weather events alter flower phenology of European grassland and heath species. Global Change Biology. 2009;15(4):837–49.Google Scholar
Kreyling, J, Wenigmann, M, Beierkuhnlein, C, Jentsch, A. Effects of extreme weather events on plant productivity and tissue die-back are modified by community composition. Ecosystems. 2008;11(5):752–63.Google Scholar
Meehl, GA, Washington, WM, Santer, BD, Collins, WD, Arblaster, JM, Hu, A, et al. Climate change projections for the twenty-first century and climate change commitment in the CCSM3. Journal of Climate. 2006;19(11):2597–616.Google Scholar
Schoof, JT, Pryor, SC, Surprenant, J. Development of daily precipitation projections for the United States based on probabilistic downscaling. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 2010;115(D13).Google Scholar
Collins, SL, Koerner, SE, Plaut, JA, Okie, JG, Brese, D, Calabrese, LB, et al. Stability of tallgrass prairie during a 19‐year increase in growing season precipitation. Functional Ecology. 2012;26(6):1450–9.Google Scholar
Epstein, HE, Lauenroth, WK, Burke, IC. Effects of temperature and soil texture on ANPP in the US Great Plains. Ecology. 1997;78(8):2628–31.Google Scholar
Epstein, HE, Lauenroth, WK, Burke, IC, Coffin, DP. Ecological responses of dominant grasses along two climatic gradients in the Great Plains of the United States. Journal of Vegetation Science. 1996;7(6):777–88.Google Scholar
Ma, W, Liu, Z, Wang, Z, Wang, W, Liang, C, Tang, Y, et al. Climate change alters interannual variation of grassland aboveground productivity: evidence from a 22-year measurement series in the Inner Mongolian grassland. Journal of Plant Research. 2010;123(4):509–17.Google Scholar
Fay, PA, Blair, JM, Smith, MD, Nippert, JB, Carlisle, JD, Knapp, AK. Relative effects of precipitation variability and warming on tallgrass prairie ecosystem function. Biogeosciences. 2011;8(10):3053–68.Google Scholar
Luo, Y, Wan, S, Hui, D, Wallace, LL. Acclimatization of soil respiration to warming in a tall grass prairie. Nature. 2001;413(6856):622.Google Scholar
Hudson, JMG, Henry, GHR. Increased plant biomass in a High Arctic heath community from 1981 to 2008. Ecology. 2009;90(10):2657–63.Google Scholar
Wu, Z, Dijkstra, P, Koch, GW, Hungate, BA. Biogeochemical and ecological feedbacks in grassland responses to warming. Nature Climate Change. 2012;2(6):458.Google Scholar
De Boeck, HJ, Lemmens, CMHM, Zavalloni, C, Gielen, B, Malchair, S, Carnol, M, et al. Biomass production in experimental grasslands of different species richness during three years of climate warming. Biogeosciences. 2008;5(2):585–94.Google Scholar
Bazzaz, FA. The response of natural ecosystems to the rising global CO2 levels. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1990;21(1):167–96.Google Scholar
Koch, GW, Mooney, HA. Response of terrestrial ecosystems to elevated CO2: a synthesis and summary. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1996.Google Scholar
Roy, J, Picon-Cochard, C, Augusti, A, Benot, M-L, Thiery, L, Darsonville, O, et al. Elevated CO2 maintains grassland net carbon uptake under a future heat and drought extreme. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2016;113(22):6224–9.Google Scholar
Morgan, JA, LeCain, DR, Pendall, E, Blumenthal, DM, Kimball, BA, Carrillo, Y, et al. C4 grasses prosper as carbon dioxide eliminates desiccation in warmed semi-arid grassland. Nature. 2011;476(7359):202.Google Scholar
Brown, PJ, DeGaetano, AT. A paradox of cooling winter soil surface temperatures in a warming northeastern United States. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 2011;151(7):947–56.Google Scholar
Ernakovich, JG, Hopping, KA, Berdanier, AB, Simpson, RT, Kachergis, EJ, Steltzer, H, et al. Predicted responses of arctic and alpine ecosystems to altered seasonality under climate change. Global Change Biology. 2014;20(10):3256–69.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, M, Østrem, L, Höglind, M. De‐hardening in contrasting cultivars of timothy and perennial ryegrass during winter and spring. Grass and Forage Science. 2010;65(1):38–48.Google Scholar
Ögren, E. Premature dehardening in Vaccinium myrtillus during a mild winter: a cause for winter dieback? Functional Ecology. 1996;10(6):724–32.Google Scholar
Sakai, A, Larcher, W. Frost survival of plants: responses and adaptation to freezing stress. Berlin: Springer; 1987.Google Scholar
Bjerke, JW, Tømmervik, H, Zielke, M, Jørgensen, M. Impacts of snow season on ground-ice accumulation, soil frost and primary productivity in a grassland of sub-Arctic Norway. Environmental Research Letters. 2015;10(9):095007.Google Scholar
Bokhorst, SF, Bjerke, JW, Tømmervik, H, Callaghan, TV, Phoenix, GK. Winter warming events damage sub‐Arctic vegetation: consistent evidence from an experimental manipulation and a natural event. Journal of Ecology. 2009;97(6):1408–15.Google Scholar
Choler, P. Growth response of temperate mountain grasslands to inter-annual variations in snow cover duration. Biogeosciences. 2015;12(12):3885–97.Google Scholar
Preece, C, Callaghan, TV, Phoenix, GK. Impacts of winter icing events on the growth, phenology and physiology of sub‐arctic dwarf shrubs. Physiologia Plantarum. 2012;146(4):460–72.Google Scholar
Liston, GE, Hiemstra, CA. The changing cryosphere: pan-Arctic snow trends (1979–2009). Journal of Climate. 2011;24(21):5691–712.Google Scholar
Henry, HAL. Climate change and soil freezing dynamics: historical trends and projected changes. Climatic Change. 2008;87(3–4):421–34.Google Scholar
Kreyling, J, Henry, HAL. Vanishing winters in Germany: soil frost dynamics and snow cover trends, and ecological implications. Climate Research. 2011;46(3):269–76.Google Scholar
Zhao, L, Ping, C-L, Yang, D, Cheng, G, Ding, Y, Liu, S. Changes of climate and seasonally frozen ground over the past 30 years in Qinghai–Xizang (Tibetan) Plateau, China. Global and Planetary Change. 2004;43(1–2):19–31.Google Scholar
Zhao, X, Tan, K, Zhao, S, Fang, J. Changing climate affects vegetation growth in the arid region of the northwestern China. Journal of Arid Environments. 2011;75(10):946–52.Google Scholar
Fraser, LH, Henry, HAL, Carlyle, CN, White, SR, Beierkuhnlein, C, Cahill, JF, et al. Coordinated distributed experiments: an emerging tool for testing global hypotheses in ecology and environmental science. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2013;11(3):147–55.Google Scholar
Sala, OE, Austin, AT. Methods of estimating aboveground net primary productivity. In: Sala, OE, Jackson, RB, Mooney, HA, Howarth, R, editors. Methods in ecosystem science. Berlin: Springer; 2000. pp. 31–43.Google Scholar
Gill, RA, Kelly, RH, Parton, WJ, Day, KA, Jackson, RB, Morgan, JA, et al. Using simple environmental variables to estimate below‐ground productivity in grasslands. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2002;11(1):79–86.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×