Book contents
- Governing Complexity
- Cambridge Studies in Economics, Choice, and Society
- Governing Complexity
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Boxes
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Foundations for Understanding and Researching Polycentric Governance
- Part II Interactions and Performance in Polycentric Governance
- Part III Constituting Polycentric Governance
- Conclusions
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 September 2019
Book contents
- Governing Complexity
- Cambridge Studies in Economics, Choice, and Society
- Governing Complexity
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Boxes
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Foundations for Understanding and Researching Polycentric Governance
- Part II Interactions and Performance in Polycentric Governance
- Part III Constituting Polycentric Governance
- Conclusions
- References
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Governing ComplexityAnalyzing and Applying Polycentricity, pp. 261 - 290Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Abbott, Kenneth W. 2012. The transnational regime complex for climate change. Environment and Planning C-Government and Policy 30 (4): 571–90. https://doi.org/10.1068/c11127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abe, Jacques, Brown, Bradford, Ajao, Emmanuel A., and Donkor, Stephen. 2016. Local to regional polycentric levels of governance of the Guinea Current Large Marine Ecosystem. Environmental Development 17: 287–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.06.006.Google Scholar
Acar, Muhittin, Guo, Chao, and Yang, Kaifeng. 2012. Accountability in voluntary partnerships: To whom and for what? Public Organization Review 12 (2): 157–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acheson, J. M. 2003. Capturing the Commons: Devising Institutions to Manage the Maine Lobster Industry. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Adger, W. Neil, Brown, Katrina, and Tompkins, Emma L.. 2005. The political economy of cross-scale networks in resource co-management. Ecology and Society 10 (2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01465-100209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. 1987. The Organization of Local Public Economies. Washington, DC: Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.Google Scholar
Aligica, Paul D. 2003. Rethinking Governance Systems and Challenging Disciplinary Boundaries: Interview with Elinor Ostrom, from Rethinking Institutional Analysis: Interviews with Vincent and Elinor Ostrom, Commemorating a Lifetime of Achievement, George Mason University, Mercatus Center, November 7, 2003, 7–14. Reprinted in Aligica and Boettke 2009. Challenging Institutional Analysis and Development: The Bloomington School. New York: Routledge; and in Cole, Daniel H., and McGinnis, Michael D., eds. 2015. Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington School of Political Economy. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 51–64.Google Scholar
Aligica, Paul D. 2014. Institutional Diversity and Political Economy: The Ostroms and Beyond. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aligica, Paul D., and Boettke, Peter. 2009. Challenging Institutional Analysis and Development: The Bloomington School. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aligica, Paul D., and Sabetti, F., eds. 2014a. Choice, Rules and Collective Action: The Ostroms on the Study of Institutions and Governance. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Aligica, Paul D., and Sabetti, F.. 2014b. Introduction: The Ostroms’ research program for the study of institutions and governance: Theoretical and epistemic foundations. In Aligica, Paul D. and Sabetti, F., eds., Choice, Rules and Collective Action: The Ostroms on the Study of Institutions and Governance. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press, 1–19.Google Scholar
Aligica, Paul D., and Tarko, Vlad. 2012. Polycentricity: From Polanyi to Ostrom, and beyond. Governance – An International Journal of Policy Administration and Institutions 25 (2): 237–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01550.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aligcia, Paul D., and Tarko, Vlad. 2013. Co-production, polycentricity, and value heterogeneity: The Ostroms’ public choice institutionalism revisited. American Political Science Review 107 (4): 726–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000427.Google Scholar
Allen, Barbara. 2014. Vincent Ostrom and the Alaska Constitution in Ostroms the Movie. https://vimeo.com/channels/ostromsthemovie/84354523.Google Scholar
Allen, Barbara, and Lutz, Donald. 2009. Experience guides theory: Discovering the political theory of a compound republic. In Filippo Sabetti, Barbara Allen, and Mark Sproule-Jones, eds., The Practice of Constitutional Development: Vincent Ostrom’s Quest to Understand Human Affairs. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 73–104.Google Scholar
Anderies, John M., and Janssen, Marco A.. 2013. Robustness of social-ecological systems: Implications for public policy. Policy Studies Journal 41 (3): 513–36.Google Scholar
Anderies, John M., Janssen, Marco A., and Ostrom, Elinor. 2004. A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecology and Society 9 (1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, Krister P., and Ostrom, Elinor. 2008. Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective. Policy Sciences 41 (1): 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077–007-9055-6.Google Scholar
Andrews, Matt. 2013. The Limits of Institutional Reform in Development: Changing Rules for Realistic Solutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Aoki, Masahiko. 2001. Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aranda-Martín, José Francisco. 2009. Irrigation and water policies in Aragon. In A., K. Biswas, C. Tortajada, and R. Izquierdo, eds., Water Management in 2020 and Beyond, 213–35. Springer.Google Scholar
Arnold, Gwen, and Robert, Holahan. 2014. The federalism of fracking: How the locus of policy-making authority affects civic engagement. The Journal of Federalism 44 (2): 344–68.Google Scholar
Arnold, Gwen, Le Anh, Nguyen Long, and Gottlieb, Madeline. 2017. Social networks and policy entrepreneurship: How relationships shape municipal decision making about high-volume hydraulic fracturing. Policy Studies Journal 45 (3): 414–41.Google Scholar
Arthur, W. Brian. 1994. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. www.jstor.org/stable/10.3998/mpub.10029.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert, and Cohen, Michael D.. 2000. Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier. Riverside, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Elizabeth, Washington-Ottombre, Camille, Dell’Angelo, Jampel, Cole, Daniel, and Evans, Tom. 2016. Polycentric governance and irrigation reform in Kenya. Governance 29 (2): 207–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12160.Google Scholar
Ban, Natalie C., Adams, Vanessa M., Almany, Glenn R., Ban, Stephen, Cinner, Josh E., McCook, Laurence J., Mills, Morena, Pressey, Robert L., and White, Alan. 2011. Designing, implementing and managing marine protected areas: Emerging trends and opportunities for coral reef nations. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 408 (1–2, SI): 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2011.07.023.Google Scholar
Bardhan, Pranab, and Dayton-Johnson, Jeff. 2002. Unequal irrigators heterogeneity and commons management in large-scale multivariate research. In Ostrom, Elinor, ed., The Drama of the Commons. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 87–112.Google Scholar
Basurto, Xavier. 2013. Linking multi-level governance to local common-pool resource theory using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis: Insights from twenty years of biodiversity conservation in Costa Rica. Global Environmental Change 23 (3): 573–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.011.Google Scholar
Basurto, Xavier, and Ostrom, Elinor. 2009. Beyond the tragedy of the Commons. Economia delle fonti di energia e dell’ambiente (1): 35–60.Google Scholar
Beach, D. (2016). It’s all about mechanisms – What process-tracing case studies should be tracing. New Political Economy, 21(5): 463–72.Google Scholar
Beach, D., and Pedersen, R. B., (2016). Selecting appropriate cases when tracing causal mechanisms. Sociological Methods & Research 47(4): 837–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124115622510Google Scholar
Becker, Gert, Huitema, Dave, and Aerts, Jeroen C. J. H.. 2015. Prescriptions for adaptive comanagement: The case of flood management in the German Rhine basin. Ecology and Society 20 (3). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07562-200301.Google Scholar
Bednar, Jenna. 2009. The Robust Federation: Principles of Design: Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. Cambridge. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bednar, Jena. 2011. The political science of federalism. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 7: 269–88.Google Scholar
Bendor, Jonathan B. 1985. Parallel Systems: Redundancy in Government. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, A., and Elman, C.. (2006). Complex causal relations and case study methods: The example of path dependence. Political Analysis 14(3): 250–67.Google Scholar
Benson, David, Gain, Animesh K., and Rouillard, Josselin J.. 2015. Water governance in a comparative perspective: From IWRM to a ‘Nexus’ approach? Water Alternatives 8 (1): 756–73.Google Scholar
Berardo, Ramiro, and Lubell, Mark. 2016. Understanding what shapes a polycentric governance system. Public Administration Review 76 (5): 738–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12532.Google Scholar
Berardo, Ramiro, and Scholz, J. T.. 2010. Self-organizing policy networks: Risk, partner selection, and cooperation in estuaries. American Journal of Political Science 54 (3): 632–49. www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-77954255825&partnerID=40&md5=04a8bf211ac39eee3961d75675609dc4.Google Scholar
Berbel, Julio, Gutiérrez-Martín, Carlos, Rodríguez-Díaz, Juan A., Camacho, Emilio, and Montesinos, Pilar. 2015. Literature review on rebound effect of water saving measures and analysis of a Spanish case study. Water Resources Management 29 (3): 663–78.Google Scholar
Berger, P. L., and Neuhaus, R. J.. 1977. To Empower People: The Role of Mediating Structures in Public Policy. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Berkes, Fikret. 2005. Why keep a community-based focus in times of global interactions? Topics in Arctic Social Sciences 5: 33–43.Google Scholar
Berkes, Fikret. 2006. From community-based resource management to complex systems: The scale issue and marine commons. Ecology and Society 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01431-110145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, F. 2007. Community-based conservation in a globalized world. 104 (39): 15188–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, F. 2017. Environmental governance for the Anthropocene? Social-ecological systems, resilience and collaborative learning. Sustainability 9:1232. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071232.Google Scholar
Beyer, Jürgen. 2011. Pfadabkehr: Die Internationalisierung des deutschen Unternehmenskontroll-und Rechnungslegungssystems. In Thomas M. J. Möllers, ed., Internationalisierung von Standards, 145–74.Google Scholar
Bidwell, R. D., and Ryan, C. M.. 2006. Collaborative partnership design: The implications of organizational affiliation for watershed partnerships. Society and Natural Resources 19 (9): 827–43.Google Scholar
Biggs, Reinette, Schlüter, Maja, and Schoon, Michael L., eds., 2015. Principles for Building Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Social-Ecological Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bish, Robert. 1999. Federalist Theory and Polycentricity: Learning from Local Governments. In Racheter, Donald P., and Wagner, Richard E., eds., Limiting Leviathan. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Bish, Robert. 2014. Vincent Ostrom’s contribution to political economy. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 44 (2): 227–48.Google Scholar
Biswas, A. K. 2004. Integrated water resources management: A reassessment. Water International 29 (2): 248–56. https://doi. 10.1080/02508060408691775.Google Scholar
Blomquist, William. 1992. Dividing the Waters: Governing Groundwater in Southern California. San Francisco, CA: ICS Press.Google Scholar
Blomquist, William. 2009. Crafting Water Constitutions in California. In The Practice of Constitutional Development: Vincent Ostrom’s Quest to Understand Human Affairs. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 105.Google Scholar
BOE. 2005. Real Decreto-ley 15/2005, de 16 de diciembre, de medidas urgentes para la regulación de las transacciones de derechos al aprovechamiento de agua.Google Scholar
Boelens, Rutgerd, Dourojeanni, Axel, Duran, Alfredo, and Hoogendam, Paul. 1998. Water rights and watersheds: Managing multiple water uses and strengthening stakeholder platforms. In Boelens, Rutgerd and Davila, Gloria, eds., Searching for Equity: Conceptions of Justice and Equity in Peasant Irrigation. Assen, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Boelens, Rutgerd, and Davila, Gloria, eds. 1998. Searching for Equity: Conceptions of Justice and Equity in Peasant Irrigation. Assen, the Netherlands: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Boelens, Rutgerd, Hoogesteger, Jaime, and Baud, Michiel. 2015. Water reform governmentality in Ecuador: Neoliberalism, centralization, and the restraining of polycentric authority and community rule-making. Geoforum 64: 281–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.07.005.Google Scholar
Boelens, Rutgerd, Zwarteveen, Margreet, and Roth, Dik. 2005. Legal Complexity in the Analysis of Water Rights and Water Resources Management. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Boettke, Peter J., and Coyne, Christopher J.. 2005. Methodological individualism, spontaneous order and the research program of the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 57 (2): 145–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2004.06.012.Google Scholar
Boettke, Peter J., Coyne, Christopher J., and Leeson, Peter T.. 2011. Quaimarket Failure. Public Choice 149 (1/2): 209–24.Google Scholar
Boettke, Peter J., and Aligica, Paul D.. 2009. Challenging Institutional Analysis and Development. Abingdon, UK; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Borgatti, Stephen P., Everett, Martin G., and Johnson, Jeffrey C.. 2013. Analyzing Social Networks. London: SAGE Publications Limited.Google Scholar
Boyte, Harry, Elkin, Stephen, Levine, Peter, Mansbridge, Jane, Ostrom, Elinor, Soltan, Karol, and Smith, Rogers. 2014. The new civic politics: Civic theory and practice for the future. The Good Society 23 (2): 206–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, Daniel W. 1989. Economic Interests and Institutions: The Conceptual Foundations of Public Policy. New York, NY: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bromley, Daniel W. 1991. Environment and Economy: Property Rights and Public Policy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bromley, Daniel W. 2006. Sufficient Reason: Volitional Pragmatism and the Meaning of Economic Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0734/2005017807-b.html.Google Scholar
Bromley, Daniel W. 2012. Environmental governance as stochastic belief updating: Crafting rules to live by. Ecology and Society 17 (3). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04774-170314.Google Scholar
Brugha, Ruairi, and Varvasovszky, Zsuzsa. 2000. Stakeholder analysis: A review. Health Policy and Planning 15 (3): 239–46.Google Scholar
Brunner, Ronald D. 2002. Problems of governance. In Brunner, Ronald D., Colburn, Christine H., Cromley, Chritsina M., and Klein, Roberta A., eds., Finding Common Ground: Governance and Natural Resources in the American West. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1–47.Google Scholar
Bryson, John, Sancino, Alessandro, Benington, John, and Sorensen, Eva (2017) Towards a multi-actor theory of public value co-creation. Public Management Review 19 (5): 640–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, James M., and Brennan, Geoffrey. 1985. The Reason of Rules. Cambridge, UK, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M., and Tullock, Gordon. 1962. The Calculus of Consent. Collected Works of James M. Buchanan. 3 vols. Ann Arbour, MI : University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M., and Congleton, Roger D.. 1998. Politics by Principle, Not Interest: Towards Nondiscriminatory Democracy. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buthe, T. (2012). Taking temporality seriously: Modeling history and the use of narratives as evidence. American Political Science Review, 96(3): 481–93.Google Scholar
Buytaert, Wouter, Dewulf, Art, de Bievre, Bert, Clark, Julian, and Hannah, David M.. 2016. Citizen science for water resources management: Toward polycentric modeling and governance? Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 142 (4): 1–4.Google Scholar
Byron, N. 2011. What can the Murray-Darling Basin Plan achieve? Will it be enough? In Connell, D., and Grafton, R. Q., eds., Basin Futures: Water Reform in the Murray-Darling Basin. Canberra: ANU E Press, 385–98.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. 2016. Two steps forward, one step back: The ongoing failure to capture synergies in natural resource management (Australia). In Young, M. D., and Esau, C., eds., Transformational Change in Environmental and Natural Resource Management: Guidelines for Policy Excellence. New York: Routledge, 80–94.Google Scholar
Capano, Giliberto. 2009. Understanding policy change as an epistemological and theoretical problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 11 (1): 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980802648284.Google Scholar
Cardenas, J. C., Stranlund, J. K., and Willis, C.. 2000. Local environmental control and institutional crowding out. World Development 28(10): 1719–33.Google Scholar
Carlisle, Keith, and Gruby, Rebecca L.. 2017. Polycentric systems of governance: A theoretical model for the commons. Policy Studies Journal 10 (2): 629. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12212.Google Scholar
Carlsson, L., and Sandström, A.. 2008. Network governance of the commons. International Journal of the Commons 2 (1): 33–54.Google Scholar
Cash, D. W. 2000. Distributed assessment systems: An emerging paradigm of research, assessment and decision-making for environmental change. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 10 (4): 241–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cash, David, Adger, W., Neil, W., Birkes, Fikret, Garden, Po, Lebel, Louis, Olsson, Per, Pritchard, Lowell, and Young, Oran. 2006. Scale and cross-scale dynamics: Governance and information in a multi-level world. Ecology & Society 11 (2).Google Scholar
CESA. 2012. Informe socioeconómico de la década 2001-2010 en Aragón. Zaragoza: Consejo Económico y Social de Aragón.Google Scholar
Chaffin, B. C., Garmestani, A. S., Gosnell, H., and Craig, R. K.. 2016. Institutional networks and adaptive water governance in the Klamath River Basin, USA. Environmental Science & Policy 57: 112–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.11.008.Google Scholar
Challen, Ray. 2000. Institutions Transaction Cost and Environmental Policy: Institutional Reform for Water Resources. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Chambers, R. 1994. Participatory rural appraisal (PRA): Analysis of experience. World Development 22 (9): 1253–68.Google Scholar
Chen, X., Lupi, F., He, G., and Liu, J.. 2009. Linking social norms to efficient conservation investment in payments for ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (28): 11812–17.Google Scholar
Chirkov, V. I, Ryan, R. M, and Sheldon, K. M, eds. 2011. Human Autonomy in Cross-Cultural Contexts: Perspectives on the Psychology of Agency, Freedom and Well-Being. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Christin, Thomas, and Hug, Simon. 2012. Federalism, the geographic location of groups, and conflict. Conflict Management and Peace Science 29 (1): 93–122.Google Scholar
Cleaver, Frances. 2002. Reinventing institutions: Bricolage and the social embeddedness of natural resource management. The European Journal of Development Research 14 (2): 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/714000425.Google Scholar
Cleaver, Frances. 2012. Development through Bricolage: Rethinking Institutions for Natural Resource Management. 1st edn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. 1990. The Firm, the Market and the Law. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cochrane, Cathy, ed., 2017. State of the Sound. Washington DC: Puget Sound Partnership.Google Scholar
Cole, Daniel H. 2011. From global to polycentric climate governance. Climate Law 2(3): 395–413.Google Scholar
Cole, Daniel H. 2013. The varieties of comparative institutional analysis. Wisconsin Law Review 2013: 383–409.Google Scholar
Cole, Daniel H. 2015. Advantages of a polycentric approach to climate change policy. Nature Climate Change 5 (2): 114–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE2490.Google Scholar
Cole, Daniel H., and McGinnis, Michael D., eds. 2014. Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington School of Political Economy, Volume 1: Polycentricity in Public Administration and Political Science. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Cole, Daniel H., and McGinnis, Michael D., eds. 2015. Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington School of Political Economy. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Colorado Supreme Court. 2016. No. 15SC667. City of Longmont v. Colo. Oil and Gas Ass’n Preemption—Inalienable Rights Provision.Google Scholar
Columbia Basin Water Transactions Programme (CBWTP). 2017. 2016 Annual Report. Portland, OR: CBWTP.Google Scholar
Congleton, Roger D. 2014. The contractarian constitutional political economy of James Buchanan. Constitutional Political Economy 25 (1): 39–67.Google Scholar
Conrad, E., Moran, T., DuPraw, M., Ceppos, D., Martinez, J., and Blomquist, W.. 2018. Diverse stakeholders create collaborative, multilevel basin governance for groundwater sustainability. California Agriculture 72 (1): 44–53.Google Scholar
Cooperrider, David L. 2005. Appreciative Inquiry: A Positive Revolution in Change. 1st edn. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
Copes, P. 1986. A critical review of the individual quota as a device in fisheries management. Land Economics 62(3): 278–91.Google Scholar
Cosens, Barbara, McKinney, Matthew, Paisley, Richard, and Wolf, Aaron T.. 2018. Reconciliation of development and ecosystems: the ecology of governance in the International Columbia River Basin. Regional Environmental Change 18(6): 1679–92. doi: 10.1007/s10113-018-1355-1.Google Scholar
Council of Australian Governments. 2000. Our vital resource: A National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality.Google Scholar
Coward, Walter Jr. E. 1979. Principles of social organisation in an indegenous irrigation system. Human Organisation 38 (1): 29–36.Google Scholar
Cox, Michael, Arnold, Gwen, and Tomás, Sergio Villamayor. 2010. A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecology & Society 15 (4).Google Scholar
Crawford, Sue, and Ostrom, Elinor. 1995. A grammer of institutions. American Political Science Review 89 (3): 582–600.Google Scholar
Cumming, Graeme S. 2016. Heterarchies: Reconciling networks and hierarchies. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 31 (8): 622–32.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Gord, and Mathie, Alison. 2002. Asset-based community development: An overview. Coady International Institute. http://www.synergos.org/knowledge/02/abcdoverview.htm (1 of 5)9/10/2009 2:25:00 PM Retrieved February 4, 2009.Google Scholar
Curtis, A., Ross, H., Marshall, G. R., Baldwin, C., Cavaye, J., Freeman, C., Carr, A., and Syme, G. J.. 2014. The great experiment with devolved NRM governance: Lessons from community engagement in Australia and New Zealand since the 1980s. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 21 (2): 175–99.Google Scholar
Davenport, Coral. (2016). Obama Fracking Rule Is Struck Down by Court. The New York Times, 22 June 2016. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/2016/06/23/us/politics/hydraulic-fracturing-interior-department-regulations.htmlGoogle Scholar
Davis, Charles. 2012. The politics of ‘fracking’: Regulating natural gas drilling practices in Colorado and Texas. Review of Policy Research 29 (2): 177–91.Google Scholar
DeCaro, Daniel, Chaffin, Brian, Schlager, Edella, Garmestani, Ahjond, and Ruhl, J. B.. 2017. Legal and institutional foundations of adaptive environmental governance. Ecology and Society 22 (1).Google Scholar
DeCaro, Daniel A., and Stokes, Michael K.. 2013. Public participation and institutional fit: A social–psychological perspective. Ecology and Society 18 (4). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05837-180440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E. L. 1971. Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 18 (1): 105–15.Google Scholar
Dietz, T., Ostrom, Elinor, and Stern, P. C.. 2003. The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302 (5652): 1907–12.Google Scholar
Dobson, A. 2007. Environmental citizenship: Towards sustainable development. Sustainable Development 15 (4): 276–85.Google Scholar
Dorsch, Marcel J., and Flachsland, Christian. 2017. A polycentric approach to global climate governance. Global Environmental Politics 17 (2): 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00400.Google Scholar
Edmunds, David, and Wollenberg, Eva. 2001. A strategic approach to multi-stakeholder negotiations. Development and Change 32: 231–53.Google Scholar
Ekstrom, Julia A., and Young, Oran R.. 2009. Evaluating functional fit between a set of institutions and an ecosystem. Ecology and Society 14 (2).Google Scholar
Elazar, Daniel. 1987. Exploring Federalism. Tuscaloosa, AL: University Press of Alabama.Google Scholar
Elazar, Daniel. 1998. Covenant and Civil Society: The Constitutional Matrix of Modern Democracy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Elkin, Stephen L. 1988. Political institutions and political practice. In Portis, Edward B. and Levy, Michael B., eds., Handbook of Political Theory and Policy Science. New York: Greenwood Press, 111–25.Google Scholar
Ellerman, D. 2006. Helping People Help Themselves: From the World Bank to an Alternative Philosophy of Development Assistance. Ann Arbour, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Embid, Antonio 2013. La crisis del sistema concesional y la aparición de fórmulas complementarias para la asignación de recursos hídricos. Algunas reflexiones sobre los mercados de derechos de uso del Agua. In XVIII Jornadas de Derechos de Aguas: Usos de aguas, Concesiones, Autorizaciones y Mercados de Aguas. Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Emerson, K., Orr, P. J., Keyes, D. L., and McKnight, K. M.. 2009. Environmental conflict resolution: Evaluating performance outcomes and contributing factors. Conflict Resoultion Quarterly 27 (1): 27–64.Google Scholar
Engle, N. L., Lemos, M.C., 2010. Unpacking governance: Building adaptive capacity to climate change of river basins in Brazil. Global Environmental Change 20(1): 4–13.Google Scholar
Falconer, Katherine. 2002. Developing cooperative approaches to agri-environmental policy: A transaction cost perspective on farmer participation in voluntary schemes. In Hagedorn, Konrad, ed., Environmental Co-Operation and Institutional Change: Theories and Policies for European Agriculture. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Falk, Armin, and Fischbacher, Urs. 2001. A Theory of Reciprocity. Discussion paper series. Industrial organization / CEPR 3014. London: CEPR.Google Scholar
Falleti, T. G., and Lynch, J. (2008). From process to mechanism: Varieties of disaggregation. Qualitative Sociology 31(4): 333–39.Google Scholar
Feiock, R. C. 2013. The Institutional Collective Action Framework. Policy Studies Journal 41 (3): 397–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Focht, Will, and Trachtenberg, Zev. 2005. A trust-based guide to stakeholder participation. In Sabatier, Paul A., Focht, Will, Lubell, Mark, Trachtenberg, Zev, Vedlitz, Arnold, and Matlock, Marty, eds., Swimming Upstream: Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Management: Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 85–135.Google Scholar
Folke, Carl. 2006. Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change 16: 253–67.Google Scholar
Folke, Carl, Pritchard, LowellJr, Berkes, Fikret, Colding, Johan, and Svedin, Uno. 2007. The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: Ten years later. Ecology and Society 12 (1).Google Scholar
Folke, Carl, Hahn, Thomas, Olsson, Per, and Norberg, Jon. 2005. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30 (1): 441–73. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511.Google Scholar
Tracker, Frack. 2018. Fracking Bans and Moratoria in New York State. www.fractracker.org/map/us/new-york/moratoria/.Google Scholar
French, Stanely G. 1967. Kant’s constitutive-regulative distinction. The Monist 51 (4): 623–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fresco, Louise O. 2009. Challenges for food system adaptation today and tomorrow. Environmental Science and Policy 12 (4): 378–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2008.11.001.Google Scholar
Frey, B. S. 1997. Not Just for the Money: An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation. Brookfield, USA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Frey, B. S. 2012. Crowding out and crowding in of intrinsic preferences. In Brousseau, E., Dedeurwaerdere, T., and Siebenhüner, B., eds., Reflexive Governance for Global Public Goods. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 75–83.Google Scholar
Frey, B. S., and Jegen, R.. 2001. Motivation crowding theory: A survey of empirical evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys 15: 589–611.Google Scholar
Fritsch, Michael. 2014. Marktversagen und Wirtschaftspolitik: Mikroökonomische Grundlagen staatlichen Handelns. 9., vollst. überarb. Aufl. Vahlens Handbücher der Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften. München: Vahlen.Google Scholar
Galaz, Victor, Crona, Beatrice, Österblom, Henrik, Olsson, Per, and Folke, Carl. 2012. Polycentric systems and interacting planetary boundaries — Emerging governance of climate change–ocean acidification–marine biodiversity. Ecological Economics 81:21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.012.Google Scholar
Galusha, Diane. 1999. Liquid Assests: A History of New York City’s Water System. Fleishmanns, New York: Purple Mountain Press.Google Scholar
Garmestani, Ahjond S., and Benson, Melinda Harm. 2013. A framework for resilience-based governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology & Society 18 (1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05180-180109.Google Scholar
Garrick, Dustin. 2015. Water Allocation in Rivers under Pressure: Water Trading, Transaction Costs and Transboundary Governance in the Western US and Australia. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Garrick, Dustin, and Aylward, Bruce. 2012. Transaction costs and institutional performance in market-based environmental water allocation. Land Economics 88 (3): 536–60.Google Scholar
Garrick, Dustin, Schlager, Edella, and Villamayor-Tomás, Sergio. 2016. Governing an international transboundary river: Opportunism, safeguards, and drought adaptation in the Rio Grande. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 46 (2): 170–98.Google Scholar
Garrick, Dustin, and O’Donnell, Erin. 2016. Exploring private roles in environmental watering in Australia and the US. In Protecting the environment, privately, 203–231. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Garrick, D., Siebentritt, M. A., Aylward, B., Bauer, C. J., and Purkey, A. (2009). Water markets and freshwater ecosystem services: Policy reform and implementation in the Columbia and Murray-Darling Basins. Ecological Economics, 69(2): 366–79.Google Scholar
Garrick, Dustin, Whitten, Stuart M., and Coggan, Anthea. 2013. Understanding the evolution and performance of water markets and allocation policy: A transaction costs analysis framework. Ecological Economics 88: 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.010.Google Scholar
Garrido, Alberto. 2007. Water markets design and evidence from experimental economics. Environmental and Resource Economics 38 (3): 311–30.Google Scholar
Garrido, Alberto, and Ramón Llamas, M. 2009. Water management in Spain: An example of changing paradigms. In Dinar, A. and Albiac, J., eds., Policy and Strategic Behaviour in Water Resource Management. London: Earthscan. 125–46.Google Scholar
Gibson, Clark, Ostrom, Elinor, and Ahn, T. K. 2000. The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change. Ecological Economics 32: 217–39.Google Scholar
Gibson-Graham, Julie Katherine. 2006. A Postcapitalist Politics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Giffinger, Rudolf, and Suitner, Johannes. 2014. Polycentric metropolitan development: From structural assessment to processual dimensions. European Planning Studies 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2014.905007.Google Scholar
Giordano, Mark, and Shah, Tushaar. 2014. From IWRM back to integrated water resources management. International Journal of Water Resources Development 30 (3): 364–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2013.851521.Google Scholar
Glick, D., Ray, K., and Wood, T.. 2016. Fractured, Part V: Trouble in Triple Creek. The Colorado Independent, 2 November 2016. www.coloradoindependent.com/162050/fractured-triple-creek-extraction-oil-and-gas.Google Scholar
Global Water Partnership. 2008. Integrated Water Resources Management. www.gwptoolbox.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=8&Itemid=3.Google Scholar
Golten, Ryan, Ward, Tabor, and Mutz, Kathryn. 2016. Stakeholder Assessment: Colorado Oil and Gas Development. Insights from the Field. Toward an Understanding of Industry-Community MOUs. www.oilandgasbmps.org/docs/CO189_MOU_Stakeholder_Assessment_2016.pdfGoogle Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. 1996. The Theory of Institutional Design. Cambridge UK; New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grimble, Robin, and Wellard, Kate. 1997. Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: A review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agricultural Systems 55 (2): 173–93.Google Scholar
Gruby, Rebecca L., and Basurto, Xavier. 2014. Multi-level governance for large marine commons: Politics and polycentricity in Palau’s protected area network. Environmental Science & Policy 36: 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.08.001.Google Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2011. Time will tell? Temporality and the analysis of causal mechanisms and processes. Comparative Political Studies 44 (9): 1267–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010390653.Google Scholar
Gupta, Joyeeta, Termeer, Catrien, Klostermann, Judith, Meijerink, Sander, van den Brink, Margo, Jong, Pieter, Nooteboom, Sibout, and Bergsma, Emmy. 2010. The adaptive capacity wheel: A method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environmental Science & Policy 13 (6): 459–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.05.006.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter M. 1993. Epistemic communities and the dynamics of international environmental co-operations. In Rittberger, Volker, and Mayer, Peter, eds., Regime Theory and International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 168–201.Google Scholar
Hagedorn, Konrad, ed. 2002. Environmental Co-Operation and Institutional Change: Theories and Policies for European Agriculture. New Horizons in Environmental Economics. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Hagedorn, Konrad. 2008. Particular requirements for institutional analysis in nature-related sectors. European Review of Agricultural Economics 35 (4): 357–84.Google Scholar
Hagedorn, Konrad. 2015. Can the concept of integrative and segregative institutions contribute to the framing of institutions of sustainability? Sustainability 7 (1): 584–611. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7010584.Google Scholar
Hakim, D. 2012. Shift by Cuomo on Gas Drilling Prompts Both Anger and Praise. New York Times, 30 September 2012.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Jay, John, and Madison, James. 2009. The Federalist Papers. www.gutenberg.org/files/1404/1404-h/1404-h.htm.Google Scholar
Hanlon, Jeffery Wyatt. 2015. Maintaining Robust Resource Governance: Mechanisms of Formal Institutional Change in a Federal Bargain. Electronic Dissertation, University of Arizona. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/577203.Google Scholar
Hardy, Scott D., and Koontz, Tomas M.. 2008. Reducing nonpoint source pollution through collaboration: Policies and programs across the US states. Environmental Management 41 (3): 301–10.Google Scholar
Hauck, Jennifer, Stein, Christian, Schiffer, Eva, and Vandewalle, Marie. 2015. Seeing the forest and the trees: Facilitating participatory network planning in environmental governance. Global Environmental Change 35: 400–10.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1960. The Constitutional of Liberty. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heater, D. B. (2004). Citizenship: The Civic Ideal in World History, Politics and Education. Manchester UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Heikkila, Tanya, and Weible, Christopher M.. 2015. A Summary Report of a 2015 Survey of the Politics of Oil and Gas Development Using Hydraulic Fracturing in Colorado. www.ucdenver.edu/academics/colleges/SPA/researchandoutreach/SPA%20Institute/Centres/WOPPR/WOPPRresearch/natgasdev/Documents/CO%20Stakeholder%20Report%202015%207-24-15.pdf.Google Scholar
Heikkila, Tanya, and Weible, Christopher M.. 2016. Contours of coalition politics on hydraulic fracturing within the United States of America. In Weible, Christopher M., Heikkila, Tanya, Ingold, K., and Fischer, M., eds., Policy Debates on Hydraulic Fracturing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 29–52.Google Scholar
Heikkila, Tanya and Weible, Christopher M.. 2017. Unpacking the intensity of policy conflict: A study of Colorado’s oil and gas subsystem. Policy Sciences 50 (2): 179–93.Google Scholar
Heikkila, Tanya, and Weible, Christopher M.. 2018. A semiautomated approach to analyzing polycentric governance. Environmental Policy and Governance 28(4): 308–18.Google Scholar
Heikkila, Tanya, Weible, Christopher M., and Pierce, Jonathan J.. 2014. Exploring the policy narratives and politics of hydraulic fracturing in New York. In Jones, M. D., Shanahan, E. A., and McBeth, M. K., eds., The Science of Stories. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 185–205.Google Scholar
Heikkila, Tanya, and Schlager, Edella. 2012. Addressing the issues: The choice of environmental conflict‐resolution venues in the United States. American Journal of Political Science 56 (4): 774–86.Google Scholar
Heikkila, Tanya, Schlager, Edella, and Davis, Mark W.. 2011. The role of cross-scale institutional linkages in common pool resource management: Assessing interstate river compacts. Policy Studies Journal 39 (1): 121–45.Google Scholar
Heikkila, Tanya, Pierce, Jonathan J., Gallahar, Samuel, Deserai, Jennifer Kagan, Crow, A., and Weible, Christopher M.. 2014. Understanding a period of policy change: The case of hydraulic fracturing disclosure policy in Colorado. Review of Policy Research 31 (2): 65–87.Google Scholar
Heikkila, Tanya, Villamayor-Tomás, Sergio, and Garrick, Dustin. 2018. Bringing polycentric systems into focus for environmental governance. Environmental Policy and Governance 28 (4): 207–318.Google Scholar
Henry, A. D., Lubell, Mark, and McCoy, Michael. 2011. Belief systems and social capital as drivers of policy network structure: The case of California regional planning. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (3): 419–44.Google Scholar
Hernandez Garcia, Alberto. 2014. Modernizacion de regadios, situacion actual y retos de futuro. iagua.Google Scholar
Hernández-Mora, Nuria, and Del Moral, Leandro. 2015. Developing markets for water reallocation: Revisiting the experience of Spanish water mercantilización. Geoforum 62: 143–55.Google Scholar
Hernández-Mora, Nuria, and De Stefano, Lucia. 2013. Los mercados informales de aguas en España: una primera aproximación. ponencia presentada en las XVIII Jornadas de Derecho de Aguas Concesiones, autorizaciones y mercados de aguas, Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Hirschleifer, Jack. 2001. The Dark Side of the Force: Economic Foundations of Conflict Theory. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1971. Introduction: Political economics and possibilism. A Bias for Hope: Essays on Development and Latin America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1986. In defense of possibilism. In Albert O. Hirschman, ed., Rival Views of Market Society and Other Recent Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 171–75.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 2004. The Evolution of Institutional Economics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 2010. Darwinian coevolution of organizations and the environment. Ecological Economics 69 (4): 700–06. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.016.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary. 2003. Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review 97 (02): 233–43.Google Scholar
Horne, A., and O’Donnell, E.. 2014. Decision making roles and responsibility for environmental water in the Murray-Darling Basin. Australian Journal of Water Resources 18 (2): 118–32.Google Scholar
Howell-Moroney, Michael. 2008. The Tiebout hypothesis 50 years later: Lessons and lingering challenges for metropolitan governance in the 21st century. Public Administration Review 68 (1): 97–109.Google Scholar
Huitema, Dave, Mostert, Erik, Egas, Wouter, Moellenkamp, Sabine, Pahl-Wostl, Claudia, and Yalcin, Resul. 2009. Adaptive water governance: Assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-)management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda. Ecology and Society 14 (1).Google Scholar
Huntjens, Patrick, Pahl-Wostl, Claudia, Rihoux, Benoit, Schlüter, Maja, Flachner, Zsuzsanna, Neto, Susana, Koskova, Romana, Dickens, Chris, and Kiti, Isah Nabide. 2011. Adaptive water management and policy learning in a changing climate: a formal comparative analysis of eight water management regimes in Europe, Africa and Asia. Environmental Policy and Governance 21 (3): 145–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.571.Google Scholar
Innes, Judith E., and Booher, David E.. 2010. Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ison, R., Blackmore, C., and Iaquinto, B. L.. 2013. Towards systemic and adaptive governance: exploring the revealing and concealing aspects of contemporary social-learning metaphors. Ecological Economics, 87, 34–42.Google Scholar
Jensen, Olivia, and Xun, Wu. 2016. Embracing uncertainty in policy-making: The case of the water sector. Policy and Society 35 (2): 115–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2016.07.002.Google Scholar
Jones, Candace, Hesterly, William S., and Borgatti, Stephen P.. 1997. A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review 22 (4): 911–45.Google Scholar
Jordan, Andrew, and Huitema, Dave. 2014. Policy innovation in a changing climate: Sources, patterns and effects. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 29: 387–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.005.Google Scholar
Jordan, Andrew J., Huitema, Dave, van Asselt, Harro, and Forster, Johanna. 2018. Governing Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jordan, Andrew J., Huitema, Dave, Hildén, Mikael, van Asselt, Harro, Rayner, Tim J., Schoenefeld, Jonas J., Tosun, Jale, Forster, Johanna, and Boasson, Elin L.. 2015. Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nature Climate Change 5 (11): 977–82. https://doi.org/10.1038/NCLIMATE2725.Google Scholar
Jupille, J., Checkel, J. T., and Caporaso, J. A.. 2003. Integrating institutions: Rationalism, constructivism and the study of the European Union. Comparative Political Studies 36 (1/2): 7–40.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Thomas. 2014. Citing health risks, Cuomo bans fracking in New York state. New York Times, 17 December 2014.Google Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart. 1995. At Home in the Universe: The Search for Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kauffman, Stuart, and Levin, Simon. 1987. Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes. Journal of theoretical Biology 128 (1): 11–45.Google Scholar
Keast, Robyn, Myrna, P., Mandell, Kerry Brown, and Woolcock, Geoffrey. 2004. Network structures: Working differently and changing expectations. Public Administration Review 64 (3): 363–71.Google Scholar
Kendy, Eloise, Aylward, Bruce, Ziemer, Laura S., Richter, Brian D., Colby, Bonnie G., Grantham, Theodore E., Sanchez, Leslie, Dicharry, Will B., Powell, Emily M., and Martin, Season. 2018. Water transactions for streamflow restoration, water supply reliability, and rural economic vitality in the western United States. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 54 (2): 487–504.Google Scholar
Kerber, Heide. 2017. Marine Litter and the Commons: How Can Effective Governance Be Established? Biennial conference of the International Association for the Study of the Commons, July 10. Utrecht, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Kerr, John. 2007. Watershed management: Lessons from common property theory. International Journal of the Commons 1 (1): 89–109.Google Scholar
Kiser, Larry L., and Ostrom, E.. 1982. The three worlds of action: A metatheoretical synthesis of institutional approaches. In Ostrom, E., ed., Strategies of Political Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE Publications Limited, 179–222.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Michael, Milman, Anita, Owen, Dave, and Fisher, Andrew T.. 2017. The importance of institutional design for distributed local-level governance of groundwater: The case of California’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act. Water 9 (10): 755.Google Scholar
Kneese, Allen V. 1968. The problem shed as a unit for environmental control. Archives of Environmental Health: An International Journal 16 (1): 124–27.Google Scholar
Knieper, Christian, and Pahl-Wostl, Claudia. 2016. A comparative analysis of water governance, water management, and environmental performance in river basins. Water Resources Management 30 (7): 2161–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269–016-1276-z.Google Scholar
Knight, Jack. 1992. Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koehler, Brandi, and Koontz, Tomas M.. 2008. Citizen participation in collaborative watershed partnerships. Environmental Management 41 (2): 143–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267–007-9040-z.Google Scholar
Konisky, David M. 2007. Regulatory competition and environmental enforcement: Is there a race to the bottom? American Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 853–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00285.x.Google Scholar
Koontz, Tomas M. 2004. Collaborative Environmental Management: What Roles for Government? Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Koontz, Tomas M. 2014. Social learning in collaborative watershed planning: The importance of process control and efficacy. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 57 (10): 1572–93.Google Scholar
Koontz, Tomas M., and Thomas, Craig. 2006. What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Administration Review 66 (6): 111–21.Google Scholar
Koontz, Tomas M., and Thomas, Craig. 2016. The Role of Science in Collaborative Environmental Management: Top Down and Bottom Up Efforts. Paper presented at Midwest Political Science Association annual meeting, April 8–10, Chicago.Google Scholar
Koontz, Tomas M., and Thomas, Craig. Use of science in collaborative environmental management: Evidence from local watershed partnerships in the Puget Sound. Environmental Science and Policy 88: 17–23.Google Scholar
Koontz, Tomas M., Gupta, Divya, Mudliar, Pranietha, and Ranjan, Pranay. 2015. Adaptive institutions in social-ecological systems governance: A synthesis framework. Environmental Science & Policy 53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.01.003.Google Scholar
Koontz, Tomas M., and Newig, Jens. 2014. From planning to implementation: Top down and bottom up approaches for collaborative watershed management. Policy Studies Journal 42 (3): 416–42.Google Scholar
Koontz, Tomas M., Carmin, JoAnn, Steelman, Toddi A., Thomas, Craig, Korfmacher, Katrina Smith, and Cassandra, Moseley. 2004. Collaborative Environmental Management: What Roles for Government? Washington, D.C. Resources for the Future Press.Google Scholar
Koontz, Tomas M., and Sen, Sucharita. 2013. Community responses to government defunding of watershed projects: A comparative study in India and the USA. Environmental Management 51 (3): 571–85.Google Scholar
Korfmacher, Katrina Smith. 1998. Invisible successes, visible failures: Paradoxes of ecosystem management in the Albemarle‐Pamlico estuarine study. Coastal Management 26: 191–211.Google Scholar
Korhonen, J., and Seager, T. P.. 2008. Beyond eco‐efficiency: A resilience perspective. Business Strategy and Management 17 (7): 411–19.Google Scholar
Landau, Martin. 1969. Redundancy, rationality, and the problem of duplication and overlap. Public Administration Review 29 (4): 346. https://doi.org/10.2307/973247.Google Scholar
Landau, Martin. 1973. Federalism, redundancy, and system reliability. The Journal of Federalism 3 (2): 173–96.Google Scholar
Lankford, Bruce, and Hepworth, Nick. 2010. The cathedral and the bazaar: Monocentric and polycentric river basin management. Water Alternatives 3 (1): 82–101.Google Scholar
Lankford, Bruce A., Merrey, Douglas J., Cour, Julien, and Hepworth, Nick. 2007. From Integrated to Expedient: An Adaptive Framework for River Basin Management in Developing Countries. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute.Google Scholar
Lawson, Tony. 2012. Ontology and the study of social reality: Emergence, organisation, community, power, social relations, corporations, artefacts and money. Cambridge Journal of Economics 36 (2): 345–85.Google Scholar
Leach, William D., and Pelkey, Neil W.. 2001. Making watershed partnerships work: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 127 (6): 378–85. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2001)127:6(378).Google Scholar
Lecina, S., Isidoro, D., Playán, E., and Aragüés, R.. 2010. Irrigation modernization and water conservation in Spain: The case of Riegos del Alto Aragón. Agricultural Water Management 97 (10): 1663–75.Google Scholar
Lepenies, Philipp H. 2008. Possibilism: An approach to problem-solving derived from the life and work of Albert O. Hirschman. Development and Change 39 (3): 437–59.Google Scholar
Lesson, Peter T., and Boettke, Peter J.. 2009. Two-tiered entrepreneurship and economic development. International Review of Law and Economics 29 (3): 252–59.Google Scholar
Levi, Margaret (2009) Reconsiderations of rational choice in comparative and historical analysis. In Lichbach, M. I., and Zuckerman, A. S., eds., (2007). Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture and Structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Simon, ed. 2009. The Princeton Guide to Ecology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Levin, S. A. 1998. Ecosystems and the biosphere as complex adaptive systems. Ecosystems 1 (5): 431–36. www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0000519269&partnerID=40&md5=3204204de11c8d57f167763bbcf73105.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Evan S. 2011. The perils of polycentric governance of infectious disease in South Africa. Social Science & Medicine (1982) 73 (5): 676–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.012.Google Scholar
Lin, J. Y. 1989. An economic theory of institutional change: Induced and imposed change. Cato Journal 9 (1): 1–33.Google Scholar
Loehman, Edna T, and Charney, Sasha. 2011. Further down the road to sustainable environmental flows: Funding, management activities and governance for six western US states. Water International 36 (7): 873–93.Google Scholar
Low, Bobbi, Ostrom, E., and Wilson, James. 2003. Redundancy and diversity: Do they influence optimal management? In Berkes, Fikret, Colding, Johan, and Folke, Carl, eds., Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. New York: Cambridge University Press, 83–114.Google Scholar
Lubell, Mark. 2004. Collaborative environmental institutions: All talk and no action? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 23 (3): 549–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20026.Google Scholar
Lubell, Mark. 2013. Governing institutional complexity: The ecology of games framework. Policy Studies Journal 41 (3): 537–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12028.Google Scholar
Lubell, Mark, Henry, A. D., and McCoy, Mike. 2010. Collaborative Institutions in an ecology of games. American Journal of Political Science 54 (2): 287–300.Google Scholar
Lubell, Mark, Robins, Garry, and Wang, Peng. 2014. Network structure and institutional complexity in an ecology of water management games. Ecology and Society 19 (4).Google Scholar
Lurie, S., and Hibbard, M.. 2008. Community-based natural resource management: Ideals and realities in Oregon watershed councils. Society and Natural Resources: An International Journal 21 (5): 430–40.Google Scholar
Odell, Mac. Appreciative Planning and Action: Mission Statement. www.macodell.com/page-Appreciative-Planning.Google Scholar
Malik, A. 2013. Reconciliation between Muslims and Christians: Collective action, norm entrepreneurship, and ‘A Common Word between Us’. Journal of Religious Ethics 41 (3): 457–73.Google Scholar
Malik, A. 2017. Polycentricity and cultural diversity. In Sabetti, F., and Castiglione, D., eds., Political Theory, Policy Analysis and Institutional Creativity: Extending the Work of the Bloomington School. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 107–28Google Scholar
Malik, A. 2018. Polycentricity, Islam, and Development: Potentials and Challenges in Pakistan. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Margerum, Richard D. 2011. Beyond Consensus: Improving Collaboration to Solve Complex Public Problems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marsh, David. 1992. Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press. www.gbv.de/dms/bowker/toc/9780198278528.pdf.Google Scholar
Marshall, G. R. 2002. Institutionalising cost sharing for catchment management: Lessons from land and water management planning in Australia. Water, Science and Technology 45 (11): 101–11.Google Scholar
Marshall, G. R. 2005. Economics for Collaborative Environmental Management: Renegotiating the Commons. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Marshall, G. R. 2008. Nesting, subsidiarity, and community-based environmental governance beyond the local level. International Journal of the Commons 2 (1): 75–97.Google Scholar
Marshall, G. R. 2009. Polycentricity, reciprocity, and farmer adoption of conservation practices under community-based governance. Ecological Economics 68 (5): 1507–20.Google Scholar
Marshall, G. R. 2010. Governance for a surprising world. In Cork, S., ed., Resilience and Transformation: Preparing Australia for Uncertain Futures. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing, 49–57.Google Scholar
Marshall, G. R. 2011. What ‘community’ means for farmer adoption of conservation practices. In Pannell, D. J., and Vanclay, F. M., eds., Changing Land Management: Adoption of New Practices by Rural Landholders. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing, 107–27.Google Scholar
Marshall, G. R. 2015. Polycentricity, subsidiarity and adaptive efficiency. A paper presented to the international workshop on polycentricity, Ostrom Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana USA, 14–17 December.Google Scholar
Marshall, G. R. 2017. Cost-effective environmental water for NSW wetlands and rivers. Final report to the NSW Environmental Trust. Armidale: University of New England.Google Scholar
Marshall, G. R., and Stafford Smith, D. M.. 2010. Natural resources governance for the drylands of the Murray-Darling Basin. The Rangeland Journal 32 (3): 267–82.Google Scholar
Marshall, Graham R., Hine, D. W., and East, M. J.. 2017. Can community-based governance strengthen citizenship in support of climate change adaptation? Testing insights from self-determination theory. Environmental Science and Policy 72: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.environsci.2017.02.010.Google Scholar
Marshall, Graham R., Coleman, Michael J., Sindel, Brian M., Reeve, Ian J., and Berney, Peter J.. 2016. Collective action in invasive species control, and prospects for community-based governance: The case of serrated tussock (Nassella trichotoma) in New South Wales, Australia. Land Use Policy 56: 100–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.04.028.Google Scholar
McCord, Paul, Dell’Angelo, Jampel, Baldwin, Elizabeth, and Evans, Tom. 2016. Polycentric transformation in Kenyan water governance: A dynamic analysis of institutional and social-ecological change. Policy Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12168.Google Scholar
McCoy, Amy L., Rankin Holmes, S., and Boisjolie, Brett A.. 2018. Flow restoration in the Columbia River Basin: An evaluation of a flow restoration accounting framework. Environmental management 61 (3) : 506–19.Google Scholar
McGinnis, Michael. 1999a. Polycentric Governance and Development. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
McGinnis, Michael. 1999b. Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
McGinnis, Michael. 2000. Polycentric Games and Institutions. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
McGinnis, Michael. 2005a. Beyond individualism and spontaneity: Comments on Peter Boettke and Christopher Coyne. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 57 (2): 167–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2004.06.014.Google Scholar
McGinnis, Michael D. 2005b. Costs and Challenges of Polycentric Governance. Workshop on Analyzing Problems of Polycentric Governance in the Growing EU, Berlin, June 16.Google Scholar
McGinnis, Michael. 2011a. An introduction to IAD and the language of the Ostrom workshop: A simple guide to a complex framework. Policy Studies Journal 39 (1): 169–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00401.x.Google Scholar
McGinnis, M. D. 2011b. Networks of adjacent action situations in polycentric governance. Policy Studies Journal 39 (1): 51–78.Google Scholar
McGinnis, Michael D. 2015. Elinor Ostrom: Politics as problem-solving in polycentric settings. In Cole, Daniel H., and McGinnis, Michael D., eds. 2015. Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington School of Political Economy. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 281–306.Google Scholar
McGinnis, Michael D. 2016. Polycentric Governance in Theory and Practice: Dimensions of Aspiration and Practical Limitations. Paper presented at Ostrom Workshop, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
McGinnis, Michael D., and Ostrom, Elinor. 2012. Reflections on Vincent Ostrom, public administration, and polycentricity. Public Administration Review 72 (1): 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02488.x.Google Scholar
McPhail, Edward, and Tarko, Vlad. 2017. The evolution of governance structures in a polycentric system. In Altman, Morris, ed., Handbookof Behavioral Economics and Smart Decision-Making: Rational Decision-Making within the Bounds of Reason. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, 290–313.Google Scholar
Milman, Anita, and Scott, Christopher A.. 2010. Beneath the surface: Intranational institutions and management of the United States—Mexico transboundary Santa Cruz aquifer. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 28 (3) 528–51.Google Scholar
Milward, H. B., Provan, K. G., and Else, B. A.. 1993. What does the hollow state look like? In Bozeman, B. ed., Public Management: The State of the Art. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 309–32.Google Scholar
MIMA. 2001. Real Decreto Legislativo 1/2001, de 20 de julio, por el que se aprueba el texto refundido de la Ley de Aguas. Ed, Boletin Oficial del Estado. Madrid: BOE.Google Scholar
Mohamud, Abdirahman Mohamed, and Amina Abdulkadir, M Nur. 2007. The Puntland Experience: A Bottom up Approach to Peace and State Building. Garowe, Puntland: Interpeace and the Puntland Development Research Center (chapter in forthcoming publication).Google Scholar
Moriarty, Patrick, Batchelor, Charles, Laban, Peter, and Fahmy, Hazem. 2010. Developing a practical approach to light IWRM in the Middle East. Water Alternatives 3 (1): 122–36.Google Scholar
Morrison, Tiffany H., Neil Adger, W., Brown, Katrina, Carmen Lemos, Maria, Huitema, Dave, and Hughes, Terry P.. 2017. Mitigation and adaptation in polycentric systems: sources of power in the pursuit of collective goals. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 8 (5).Google Scholar
Moschitz, Heidrun. 2009. Moving on-European organic farming movements between political action and self-reflection. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 8 (5–6): 371–87.Google Scholar
Moss, Timothy. 2012. Spatial fit, from panacea to practice: Implementing the EU water framework directive. Ecology and Society 17 (3): 2.Google Scholar
Mueller, Dennis C. 2003. Public Choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. www.gbv.de/dms/bowker/toc/9780521815468.pdf.Google Scholar
Muro, Melanie, and Jeffrey, P.. 2012. Time to talk? How the structure of dialog processes shape stakeholder learning in participatory water resources management. Ecology and Society 17 (1).Google Scholar
Myint, Tun. 2012. Governing International Rivers: Polycentric Politics in the Mekong and the Rhine. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publications.Google Scholar
Nagendra, Harini, and Ostrom, Elinor. 2012. Polycentric governance of multifunctional forested landscapes. International Journal of the Commons 6 (2): 104–33.Google Scholar
NCDD. 2017. NCDD Resource Center. National Conference on Dialogue and Deliberation. http://ncdd.org/rc/Google Scholar
New York City Independent Budget Office. The Impact of Catskill/Delaware Filtration on Residential Water and Sewer Charges in New York City. www.ibo.nyc.ny.us/iboreports/waterreport.pdf.Google Scholar
Newig, Jens, Schulz, Daniel, and Jager, Nicolas W.. 2016. Disentangling puzzles of spatial scales and participation in environmental governance – the case of governance re-scaling through the European Water Framework Directive. Environmental Management 58 (6): 998–1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267–016-0753-8.Google Scholar
Niskanen, William A. 1994. Bureaucracy and Public Economics. Aldershot, Hants, UK: Brookfield, VT, USA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Norberg, Jon, and Cumming, Graeme S.. 2008. Complexity Theory for a Sustainable Future. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
North, Douglass Cecil. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. C. 1993. Institutions and credible commitment. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 149 (1): 11–23.Google Scholar
North, Douglass Cecil. 1994. Institutional Change: A Framework of Analysis Economic History. Accessed: 10 October 10 2007. http://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpeh/9412001.html#provider.Google Scholar
North, D. C. 2005. Understanding the Process of Institutional Change. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, E., and Garrick, D.. 2017. Defining success: A multi-criteria approach to guide evaluation and investment. In Horne, A., Stewardson, M., Webb, A., Richter, B., and Acreman, M.., eds., Water for the Environment. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 625–45.Google Scholar
Oakerson, Ronald J. 1999. Governing Local Public Economies: Creating the Civic Metropolis. Oakland, CA: ICS Press.Google Scholar
Oakerson, Ronald, and Parks, Roger B.. 1988. Citizen voice and public entrepreneurship: The organisational dynamic of a complex metropolitan county. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 18 (4): 91–112.Google Scholar
Oakerson, Ronald J., and Parks, Roger B.. 2011. The study of local public economies: Multi-organizational, multi-level institutional analysis and development. Policy Studies Journal 39 (1): 147–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00400.x.Google Scholar
Obinger, Herbert. 2015. Funktionalismus. In Wenzelburger, Georg, and Zohlnhöfer, Reimut, eds., Handbuch Policy-Forschung. Springer VS Handbuch. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 35–54.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, M. 1994. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press 1971, Reprinted.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1983. A public service industry approach to the study of local government structure and performance. Policy and Politics 11 (3): 313–41. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557383782628599.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. 1986. Multiorganizational arrangements and coordination: an application of institutional analysis. In Kaufmann, F. X, Majone, Giandomenico, and Ostrom, V., eds., Guidance, Control, and Evaluation in the Public Sector. Berlin: De Gruyter, 495–510.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. 1998. A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. American Political Science Review 92 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. 1999. 1999. Polycentricity, complexity, and the commons. The Good Society 9 (2): 37–41.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. 2000. Crowding out citizenship. Scandinavian Political Studies 23 (1): 3–15.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 2001. Vulnerability and Polycentric Governance Systems. Newsletter of the International Human Dimensions Program on Global Environmental Change 3: 2.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor, ed. 2002. The Drama of the Commons. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 2005a. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. 2005b. Policies that crowd out reciprocity and collective action. In Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., and Fehr, E., eds., Moral Sentiments and Material Interests: The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 253–75.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 2007. Collective action theory. In Boix, Carles, and Stokes, Susan C., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 2009. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325 (5939): 419–22. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. 2010. Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review 100 (3): 641–72.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 2011. Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Stud Journal 39 (1): 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 2012. Nested externalities and polycentric institutions: Must we wait for global solutions to climate change before taking actions at other scales ? Economic theory 49 (2): 353–69.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 2014a. A frequently overlooked precondition of democracy: citizens knowledgable about and engaged in collective action. In Cole, Daniel H., and McGinnis, Michael D., eds. 2014. Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington School of Political Economy, Volume 1: Polycentricity in Public Administration and Political Science: Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 337–52.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 2014b. Developing a method for analyzing institutional change. In Cole, Daniel H., and McGinnis, Michael D., eds. 2014. Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington School of Political Economy, Volume 1: Polycentricity in Public Administration and Political Science: Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. 281–316.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor, Schroeder, Larry, and Wynne, Susan. 1993. Polycentric institutional arrangements. In Ostrom, E., Schroeder, L., and Wynne, S., eds., Institutional Incentives and Sustainable Development Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 107–123.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor, Janssen, Marco A., and Anderies, John M.. 2007. Introduction: Going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (39): 1517615176-8.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor, Gardner, Roy, and Walker, Jimmy. 1994. Rules, Games and Common-Pool Resources. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor, and Basurto, Xavier. 2011. Crafting analytical tools to study institutional change. Journal of Institutional Economics 7 (03): 317–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137410000305.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Vincent. 1962. The water economy and its organization. Natural Resources Journal 2 (4): 55–73.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Vincent. 1972. Polycentricity. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V. 1980. Artisanship and Artifact. Public Administration Review 40 (4): 309–17.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Vincent. 1987. The Political Theory of Compound Republic: Designing the American Experiment, 3rd ed. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V. 1991a. The Meaning of American Federalism: Constituting a Self-Governing Society. San Francisco, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Vincent. 1991b. Polycentricity: The structural basis of self-governing systems. In The Meaning of American Federalism: Constituting a Self-Governing Society. San Francisco, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press. 223–48.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V. 1997. The Meaning of Democracy and the Vulnerability of Democracies. A Response to Tocqueville’s Challenge. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Vincent. 1999a. Polycentricity (Part 1). In McGinnis, Michael. 1999. Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 52–74.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Vincent. 1999b. Polycentricity (Part 2). In McGinnis, Michael. 1999. Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 119–38.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V. 2008a. The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration. 3rd edn. Tuscaloosa, USA: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Vincent. 2008b. The Political Theory of a Compound Republic: Designing the American Experiment. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Vincent. 2015. Executive leadership, authority relationships, and public entrepreneurship. In Cole, Daniel H., and McGinnis, Michael D., eds. 2015. Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington School of Political Economy. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 217–32.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Vincent, Tiebout, Charles M., and Warren, Robert. 1961. The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review 55 (4): 831–42.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Vincent, and Ostrom, Elinor. 1999. Public goods and public choices. In McGinnis, Michael. 1999. Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 75–106.Google Scholar
Paavola, Jouni. 2007. Institutions and Environmental Governance: A Reconceptualization. Ecological Economics 63 (1): 93–103.Google Scholar
Pacheco-Vega, Raúl. 2012. Governing Wastewater: A Cross-Regional Analysis within the Lerma-Chapala River Basin in Mexico. Canadian Association of Latin American and Caribbean Studies (CALACS) 2012 (May 18th–20th, 2012. Kelowna, BC, Canada)Google Scholar
Pacheco-Vega, Raúl. 2013. Polycentric Water Governance in Mexico: Beyond the Governing-by-River-Basin-Council Model: 1–30. Paper presented in the 2013 Meeting of the Latin American Studies Association Meeting. Washington, D.C. 29 May–June 1 2013.Google Scholar
Pahl-Wostl, Claudia. 2009. A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 19 (3): 354–65.Google Scholar
Pahl-Wostl, Claudia. 2015. Water Governance in the Face of Global Change: From Understanding to Transformation: Springer.Google Scholar
Pahl-Wostl, Claudia, Arthington, Angela, Bogardi, Janos, Bunn, Stuart E., Hoff, Holger, Lebel, Louis, Nikitina, Elena, Palmer, M., Poff, L. N., Richards, K., and Schlüter M, M.. 2013. Environmental flows and water governance: Managing sustainable water uses. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 5 (3–4): 341–51.Google Scholar
Pahl-Wostl, Claudia, and Knieper, Christian. 2014. The capacity of water governance to deal with the climate change adaptation challenge: Using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis to distinguish between polycentric, fragmented and centralized regimes. Global Environmental Change 29: 139–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.003.Google Scholar
Pahl-Wostl, Claudia, and Hare, M., 2004. Processes of social learning in integrated resources management. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 14, 193–206.Google Scholar
Pahl-Wostl, Claudia, Lebel, Louis, Knieper, Christian, and Nikitina, Elena. 2012. From applying panaceas to mastering complexity: Toward adaptive water governance in river basins. Environmental Science & Policy 23: 24–34.Google Scholar
Palomo-Hierro, Sara, Gómez-Limón, José A, and Riesgo, Laura. 2015. Water markets in Spain: performance and challenges. Water 7 (2): 652–78.Google Scholar
Parks, Roger B., and Oakerson, Ronald J.. 2000. Regionalism, localism, and metropolitan governance: Suggestions from the research program on local public economies. State & Local Government Review 32 (3): 169–79.Google Scholar
Pascale, Richard, Sternin, Jerry, and Sternin, Monique. 2010. The Power of Positive Deviance: How Unlikely Innovators Solve the World’s Toughest Problems: Brighton, MA: Harvard Press Business Review.Google Scholar
Pelletier, L. G., Baxter, D., and Huta, V.. 2011. Personal autonomy and environmental sustainability. In Chirkov, V. I., Ryan, R. M., and Sheldon, K. M., eds. 2011. Human Autonomy in Cross-Cultural Contexts: Perspectives on the Psychology of Agency, Freedom and Well-Being. Dordrecht: Springer, 257–77.Google Scholar
Picazo, Perez, Teresa, Maria, and Lemeunier, Guy. 2000. Formation et mise en cause du modèle de gestion hydraulique espagnol de 1780 a 2000. Economies et Sociétés no. Hors-Série:85.Google Scholar
Peters, B. Guy. 2015. Pursuing Horizontal Management: The Politics of Public Sector Coordination. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Peters, B. Guy, and Pierre, Jon. 2004. Multi-level governance and democracy: A Faustian bargain? In Bache, Ian, and Flinders, Matthew V., eds., Multi-Level Governance. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 75–89.Google Scholar
Pierce, Jonathan J., Kagan, Jennifer, Heikkila, Tanya, Weible, Christopher M., and Gallahar, Samuel. 2013. A Summary Report of Perceptions of the Politics and Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing in Colorado. Denver, CO: University of Colorado.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000. The limits of design: Explaining institutional origins and change. Governance 13 (4): 475–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00142.Google Scholar
Platt, R. H., Barten, P. K., and Pfeffer, M. J.. 2010. A full, clean glass? Managing New York City’s watershed. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 42 (5): 8–20.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 1953. Semantics of General Economic History (Revised). New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael. 1951. The Logic of Liberty. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael. 1964. Science, Faith, and Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Postel, Sandra, and Carpenter, Stephen. 1997. Freshwater ecosystem services. In Daily, Gretchen C., ed., Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington DC: Island Press, 195–214.Google Scholar
Poteete, A. R., Janssen, M. A., and Ostrom, E.. 2010. Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Poussard, H. (ed.) 1992. Community Landcare to test government policies and programs. In Proceedings of the seventh International Soil Conservation conference: People protecting their land. Sydney, Australia, April 10, 1992.Google Scholar
Prell, Christina, Hubacek, Klaus, and Reed, Mark. 2009. Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 22 (6): 501–18.Google Scholar
Pressman, Jeffrey L., and Wildavsky, Aaron B.. 1984. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland: Or Why It’s Amazing that Federal Programs Work at All, This Being a Saga of the Economic Development Administration as Told by Two Sympathetic Observers Who Seek to Build Morals on a Foundation of Ruined Hopes. California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Prokopy, Linda Stalker, Mullendore, Nathan, Brasier, Kathryn, and Floress, Kristin. 2014. A typology of catalyst events for collaborative watershed management in the United States. Society & Natural Resources 27 (11): 1177–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.918230.Google Scholar
Puget Sound Partnership. 2014. Briefing Memo: LIO Organization History. Puget Sound Partnership, Tacoma, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Puget Sound Partnership. 2016. Puget Sound Partnership Understanding of the Value of Local Integrating Organizations Regarding LIO Ecosystem Recovery Plans.Google Scholar
Puget Sound Partnership. 2017. State of the Sound 2017. Olympia, Washington. November 2017. www.psp.wa.gov/soGoogle Scholar
Purdy, J. M. 2012. A framework for assessing power in collaborative governance processes. Public Administration Review 72 (3): 409–17.Google Scholar
Quiggin, J. 2011. Why the guide to the proposed basin plan failed, and what can be done to fix it. In Quiggin, J., Mallawaarachchi, T., and Chambers, S., eds., Water Policy Reform: Lessons in Sustainability from the Murray-Darling Basin. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Rada, J. 2007. Managing Garfield County’s Air Quality: 2008 Air Monitoring Proposal. Garfield County.Google Scholar
Rajagopalan, Shruti. 2013. Economic Analysis of Amendments to the Indian Constitution. Economics Department, George Mason University. http://hdl.handle.net/1920/8223.Google Scholar
Rajagopalan, Shruti, and Wagner, Richard E. 2013. Constitutional craftsmanship and the rule of law. Constitutional Political Economy 24 (4): 295–309.Google Scholar
Rast, J. (2012). Why history (still) matters: Time and temporality in urban political analysis. Urban Affairs Review 48 (1): 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087411418178Google Scholar
Ratner, Blake D., and Smith, William E.. 2014. Collaborating for Resilience: A Practitioner’s Guide. Manual. Collaborating for Resilience.Google Scholar
Rayner, Tim, and Jordan, Andrew. 2013. The European Union: The polycentric climate policy leader? WIREs Climate Change 4 (2): 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.205.Google Scholar
Reed, Mark S., Graves, Anil, Dandy, Norman, Posthumus, Helena, Hubacek, Klaus, Morris, Joe, Prell, Christina, Quinn, Claire H., and Stringer, Lindsay C.. 2009. Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management 90 (5): 1933–49.Google Scholar
Reeve, I., Marshall, G. R., and Musgrave, W.. 2002. Resource Governance and Integrated Catchment Management. Issues Paper no. 2 for Murray-Darling Basin Commission project MP2004.Google Scholar
Regional Implementation Working Group of the NRM Ministerial Council. 2005. Regional delivery of natural resource management - Moving forward. NRM Ministerial Council, Canberra.Google Scholar
Richter, Brian D., and Thomas, Gregory A.. 2007. Restoring environmental flows by modifying dam operations. Ecology and Society 12 (1): 12.Google Scholar
Rinfret, Sara, Cook, Jeffrey, and Pautz, Michelle. 2014. Understanding state rulemaking processes: Developing fracking rules in Colorado, New York, and Ohio. Review of Policy Research 31 (2): 88–104.Google Scholar
Rixen, T., & Viola, L. A. (2015). Putting path dependence in its place: Toward a taxonomy of institutional change. Journal of Theoretical Politics 27(2): 301–23.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, C. 2014. Negotiating conflict through federalism: Institutional and popular perspectives. Yale Law Journal 124: 2094.Google Scholar
Roe, Emery, and Schulman, Paul R.. 2008. High Reliability Management: Operating on the Edge. (High Reliability and Crisis Management). Stanford, CA. Stanford Business Books, an imprint of Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rust, Joshua. 2006. John Searle and the Construction of Social Reality. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Ryan, C. M., and Klug, J. S.. 2005. Collaborative watershed planning in Washington State: Implementing the Watershed Planning Act. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 48 (4): 491–506.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L.. 2011. A self-determination theory perspective on social, institutional, cultural, and economic supports for autonomy and their importance for well-being. In Chirkov, V. I., Ryan, R. M., and Sheldon, K. M., eds. 2011. Human Autonomy in Cross-Cultural Contexts: Perspectives on the Psychology of Agency, Freedom and Well-Being. Dordrecht: Springer, 45–64.Google Scholar
Ryan, S., Broderick, K., Sneddon, Y., and Andrews, K.. 2010. Australia’s NRM governance system: Foundations and principles for meeting future challenges. Australian Regional NRM Chairs, CanberraGoogle Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A., and Weible, Christopher M.. 2016. The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and clarifications. In Sabatier, P. A., ed., Theories of the Policy Process, 2nd edn., New York: Routledge, 189–217.Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A., Focht, Will, Lubell, Mark, Trachtenberg, Zev, Vedlitz, Arnold, and Matlock, Marty. 2005. Swimming Upstream: Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Management: Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sabetti, Filippo, Allen, Barbara, and Sproule-Jones, Mark. 2009. The Practice of Constitutional Development: Vincent Ostrom’s Quest to Understand Human Affairs. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Sabetti, Filippo, and Castiglione, Dario, eds. 2017. Institutional Diversity in Self-Governing Societies: The Bloomington School and Beyond. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Salter, Alexander William, and Tarko, Vlad. 2017. Polycentric banking and macroeconomic stability. Business and Politics 19 (02): 365–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2016.10.Google Scholar
Sarker, Ashutosh. 2013. The role of state-reinforced self-governance in averting the tragedy of the irrigation commons in Japan. Public Administration 91(3): 727–43.Google Scholar
Sayles, Jesse S., and Baggio, Jacopo A.. 2017. Social-ecological network analysis of scale mismatches in estuary watershed restoration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114 (10): E1776–E1785. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1604405114.Google Scholar
Schafer, Josephine Gatti. 2016. Mandates to coordinate: The case of the Southern Nevada Public Lands Management Act. Public Performance & Management Review 40 (1): 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2016.1177555.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Eva, and Hauck, Jennifer. 2010. Net-Map: Collecting social network data and facilitating network learning through participatory influence network mapping. Field Methods 22 (3): 231–49.Google Scholar
Schlager, Edella. 2005. Getting the relationships right in water property rights. In Bruns, Bryan, Ringler, Claudia, and Meinzen-Dick, Ruth, eds., Water Rights Reform: Lessons for Institutional Design. Washington DC: IFPRI, 27–54.Google Scholar
Schlager, Edella, Heikkila, Tanya, and Case, Carl. 2012. The costs of compliance with interstate agreements: lessons from water compacts in the Western United States. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 42 (3): 494–515.Google Scholar
Schlager, Edella, and Blomquist, William. 2008. Embracing Watershed Politics. Boulder, CO: University Press Colorado.Google Scholar
Schlager, Edella, Blomquist, William, and Tang, Shui Yan. 1994. Mobile flows storage and self-organized institutions for governing common-pool resources. Land Economics 70 (3): 294–317.Google Scholar
Schlüter, Achim. 2001. Institutioneller Wandel und Transformation: Restitution, Transformation und Privatisierung in der tschechischen Landwirtschaft. Aachen: Shaker.Google Scholar
Schmid, Alfred Allan. 2004. Conflict and Cooperation: Institutional and Behavioral Economics. Malden, MA: Blackwell. www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip048/2003018398.html.Google Scholar
Schneider, Mark. 1989. Intercity competition and the size of the local public work force. Public Choice 63 (3): 253–65.Google Scholar
Scott, Tyler A. 2016. Analyzing policy networks using valued exponential random graph models: do government‐sponsored collaborative groups enhance organizational networks? Policy Studies Journal 44 (2): 215–44.Google Scholar
Scott, Tyler A., and Thomas, Craig. 2015. Do Collaborative Groups Enhance Interorganizational Networks? Policy Studies Journal 38 (4): 654–83.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 2003. Social ontology and political power. In Schmitt, F. F., ed., Socializing Metaphysics: The Nature of Social Reality. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, 195–210Google Scholar
Searle, John. 2005. What is an Institution? Journal of Institutional Economics 1 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 2006. Social ontology: Some principles. Anthropological Theory 6 (1): 12–29.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 2010. Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Austin, Zilliox, Skylar, and Smith, Jessica. 2014. Memoranda of understanding and the social license to operate in Colorado’s unconventional energy industry: A study of citizen complaints. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law, 1–42.Google Scholar
Shackelford, Scott. 2014. Managing Cyber Attacks in International Law, Business, and Relations: In Search of Cyber Peace. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shivakumar, S. 2005. The Constitution of Development: Crafting Capabilities for Self-Governance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
da Silveira, André R., and Richards, Keith S.. 2013. The link between polycentrism and adaptive capacity in river basin governance systems: Insights from the River Rhine and the Zhujiang (Pearl River) Basin. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (2): 319–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2013.754687Google Scholar
Simonelli, Jeanne. 2014. Home rule and natural gas development in New York: Civil fracking rights. Journal of Political Ecology 21 (1): 258–78.Google Scholar
Smaldino, P. E., and Lubell, M.. 2011. An institutional mechanism for assortment in an ecology of games. PLoS ONE 6 (8). www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79961158100&partnerID=40&md5=37d2a30be789640853ea7a500b3c4422.Google Scholar
Soll, David. 2013. Empire of Water: An Environmental and Political History of the New York City Water Supply. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sovacool, Benjamin K. 2011. An international comparison of four polycentric approaches to climate and energy governance. Energy Policy 39 (6): 3832–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.014.Google Scholar
Spreng, Connor P., Sovacool, Benjamin K., and Spreng, Daniel. 2016. All hands on deck: Polycentric governance for climate change insurance. Climatic Change 139 (2): 129–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584–016-1777-z.Google Scholar
Sproule-Jones, Mark, Allen, Barbara, Sabetti, Filippo, Kuhnert, Stephan, Loveman, Brian, Malik, Anas, McGinnis, Michael D., Myint, Tun, Ostrom, Vincent, and Thomson, Jamie. 2008. The Struggle to Constitute and Sustain Productive Orders: Vincent Ostrom’s Quest to Understand Human Affairs. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/alltitles/docDetail.action?docID=10774665.Google Scholar
Steins, Nathalie A., and Edwards, Victoria M.. 1998. Platforms for Collective Action in Multiple-Use CPRs. Paper presented at Crossing Boundaries, the seventh annual conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property.Google Scholar
Susskind, Larry, and Cruikshank, J. L.. 1987. Breaking the Impasse: Consensual Approaches to Resolving Public Disputes. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sydow, Jörg, Schreyögg, Georg, and Koch, Jochen. 2009. Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review 34 (4): 689–709.Google Scholar
Tam-Kim, Yong, Uravian, Pakping, and Chalad, Bruns, eds. 2003. The Emergence of Polycentric Water Governance in Northern Thailand (Revised) 1. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tang, Shui Yan. 1992. Institutions and Collective Action: Self-Governance in Irrigation. San Francisco, CA: ICS Press.Google Scholar
Tarko, Vlad. 2017. Elinor Ostrom: An Intellectual Biography. London, New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar
Tarlock, A. Dan. 2001. The future of prior appropriation in the new west. Natural Resources Journal 41 (4):769–93.Google Scholar
Theesfeld, Insa. 2005. A Common Pool Resource in Transition: Determinants of Institutional Change for Bulgaria’s Postsocialist Irrigation Sector. Aachen: Shaker Verlag. www.gbv.de/dms/bsz/toc/bsz120714744inh.pdf.Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen. 2000. Timing and temporality in the analysis of institutional evolution and change. Studies in American Political Development 14(1), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X00213035.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. 2003. How institutions evolve – insights from comparative historical analysis. In Mahoney, J., and Rueschemeyer, D., eds., Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 208–40.Google Scholar
Thiel, Andreas. 2010a. Institutions shaping coastal ecosystems: The Algarve case. Coastal Management 38: 2, 144–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920751003605027.Google Scholar
Thiel, Andreas. 2010b. Constructing a strategic, national resource: European policies and the up-scaling of water services in the Algarve, Portugal. Environmental Management 46 (1): 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267–010-9498-y.Google Scholar
Thiel, Andreas. 2012. Developing Institutional Economics for the Analysis of Social-Ecological Systems. Berlin: Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.Google Scholar
Thiel, Andreas. 2014. Rescaling of resource governance as institutional change: Explaining the transformation of water governance in Southern Spain. Environmental Policy and Governance 24(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1644.Google Scholar
Thiel, Andreas. 2015. Constitutional state structure and scalar re-organization of natural resource governance: The transformation of polycentric water governance in Spain, Portugal and Germany. Land Use Policy 45: 176–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.012.Google Scholar
Thiel, Andreas. 2016. The Polycentricity Approach and the Research Challenges Confronting Environmental Governance: THESys Discussion Paper No. 2016-1. Berlin.Google Scholar
Thiel, Andreas. 2017. The scope of polycentric governance analysis and resulting challenges. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics 5 (3): 52–82.Google Scholar
Thiel, Andreas, and Moser, Christine. 2018. Toward comparative institutional analysis of polycentric social-ecological systems governance. Environmental Policy and Governance 28 (4): 269–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1814.Google Scholar
Thiel, Andreas, Schleyer, Christian, Hinkel, Jochen, Schlüter, Maja, Hagedorn, Konrad, Bisaro, Sandy, Bobojonov, Ihtiyor, and Hamidov, Ahmad. 2016. Transferring Williamson’s discriminating alignment to the analysis of environmental governance of social-ecological interdependence. Ecological Economics 128: 159–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.018.Google Scholar
Thiel, Andreas, Mukhtarov, Farhad, and Zikos, Dimitrios. 2015. Crafting or designing? Science and politics for purposeful institutional change in Social–Ecological Systems. Environmental Science & Policy 53: 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.018.Google Scholar
Thiel, Andreas, and Mukhtarov, Farhad. 2018. Institutional design for adaptive governance of natural resource governance: How do we cater for context and agency? In Marsden, Terry, ed., The SAGE Handbook of Nature, 1st edn. London: Sage Publications, 143–60.Google Scholar
Thomas, Craig W. 2002. Bureaucratic Landscapes: Interagency Cooperation and the Preservation of Biodiversity. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tiebout, Charles M. 1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64 (5): 416–24.Google Scholar
Toonen, Theo A. J. 1983. Administrative plurality in a unitary state: The analysis of public organizational pluralism. Policy & Politics 11: (3) 247–71.Google Scholar
Trampusch, Christine, and Palier, Bruno. 2016. Between X and Y: How process tracing contributes to opening the black box of causality. New Political Economy 21 (5): 437–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2015.1134465.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. New York, Princeton: Russell Sage Foundation; Princeton University Press. www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt7rvv7.Google Scholar
Tullock, Gordon. 2005. The Social Dilemma: Of Autocracy, Revolution, Coup d’Etat, and War. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Tullock, Gordon, Seldon, Arthur, and Brady, Gordon L.. 2002. Government Failure: A Primer in Public Choice. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.Google Scholar
U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2018. Colorado State Profile and Energy Estimates: Profile Analysis. US Energy Information Administration.Google Scholar
Ulibarri, Nicola. 2015. Collaboration in federal hydropower licensing: Impacts on process, outputs, and outcomes. Public Performance and Management Review 38 (4): 578–606.Google Scholar
United States Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. 1987. The Organization of Local Public Economies. Report A-109.Google Scholar
Van Riper, C. J., Thiel, A., Penker, M., Braito, M., Landon, A. C., and Thomsen, J. M. 2018 Incorporating multi-level values into the social-ecological systems framework. Ecology and Society 23 (3): 25.Google Scholar
van Zeben, Josephine A. W. 2013. Research Agenda for a Polycentric European Union. Working Paper Series W13–13.Google Scholar
Vanberg, Viktor, and Kerber, Wolfgang. 1994. Institutional competition among jurisdictions: An evolutionary approach. Constitutional Political Economy 5 (2): 193–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393147.Google Scholar
Varvasovszky, Zsuzsa, and Brugha, Ruair. 2000. How to do (or not to do) … A stakeholder analysis. Health Policy and Planning 15 (3): 338–45.Google Scholar
Vatn, A. 2002. Multifunctional agriculture: Some consequences for international trade regimes. European Review of Agricultural Economics 29 (3): 309–27.Google Scholar
Villamayor-Tomás, Sergio. 2014a. Adaptive irrigation management in drought contexts: Institutional robustness and cooperation in the Riegos del Alto Aragon project (Spain). In Bhaduri, Anik, Boardi, Janos, Leentvar, Jan, and Marx, Sina, eds., The Global Water System in the Anthropocene. New York: Springer, 197–215.Google Scholar
Villamayor-Tomás, Sergio. 2014b. Cooperation in common property regimes under extreme drought conditions: Empirical evidence from the use of pooled transferable quotas in Spanish irrigation systems. Ecological Economics 107: 482–93. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.005Google Scholar
Villamayor-Tomás, Sergio. 2018. Polycentricity in the water-energy nexus: A comparison of polycentric governance traits and implications for adaptive capacity of water user associations in Spain. Environmental Policy and Governance 28: 252–68.Google Scholar
Vousden, David. 2016. Local to regional polycentric governance approaches within the Agulhas and Somali current large marine ecosystems. Environmental Development 17:277–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.07.008.Google Scholar
Wagner, Richard E. 2005. Self-governance, polycentrism, and federalism: Recurring themes in Vincent Ostrom’s Scholarly Oeuvre. Journal of Economic Behaviour & Organization 57 (2): 173–88.Google Scholar
Walker, B. H. 1992. Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Conservation Biology 6 (1): 18–23.Google Scholar
Walt, G., Shiffman, J., Schneider, H., Murray, S. F., Brugha, R., & Gilson, L. (2008). ‘Doing’ health policy analysis: Methodological and conceptual reflections and challenges. Health Policy and Planning 23(5): 308–17.Google Scholar
War Torn Societies Project. 2005. Rebuilding Somaliland: Issues and Possibilities. Lawrenceville, N J: Red Sea Press.Google Scholar
Washington State Dept of Ecology. (n.d.) Watershed plan archive. https://ecology.wa.gov/Water-Shorelines/Water-supply/Streamflow-restoration/Watershed-plan-archive (accessed 4/8/2018)Google Scholar
Wegerich, K. 2007. Against the conventional wisdom: Why sector reallocation of water and multi-stakeholder platforms do not take place in Uzbekistan. Multi-stakeholder platforms for integrated water management. In Warner, J., ed., Multi-Stakeholder Platforms for Integrated Water Management. Bodmin, UK: Ashgate, 235–44.Google Scholar
Weible, Christopher M., and Heikkila, Tanya. 2016. Comparing the politics of hydraulic fracturing in New York, Colorado, and Texas. Review of Policy Research 33 (3): 232–50.Google Scholar
Weible, Christopher M., and Heikkila, Tanya. 2017. Policy conflict framework. Policy Sciences 50 (1): 23–40.Google Scholar
Weisbord, M. R., and Janoff, S.. 2007. Don’t Just Do Something Stand There! Ten Principles for Leading Meetings that Matter. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
Weller, M., and Wolff, S.. 2005. Autonomy, Self-Governance and Conflict Resolution: Innovative Approaches to Institutional Design in Divided Societies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. A., MacDonald, D. H., and Boxall, P.. 2017. Water policy debate in Australia: Understanding the tenets of stakeholders' social trust. Land Use Policy (63): 246–54.Google Scholar
Wibbels, Erik. 2005. Federalism and the Market: Intergovernmental Conflict and Economic Reform in the Developing World. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Oliver E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. 1991. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly 36: 269–96.Google Scholar
Wolf, J., Brown, K., and Conway, K.. 2009. Ecological citizenship and climate change: Perceptions and practice. Environmental Politics 18 (4): 503–21.Google Scholar
Woodhouse, P., and Muller, M.. 2017. Water governance – an historical perspective on current debates. World Development 92: 225–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.11.014.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2003. World Bank Water Resources Sector Strategy: Strategic Directions for World Bank Engagement. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Yaffee, S. L., and Wondolleck, J. M.. 2003. Collaborative ecosystem planning processes in the United States: Evolution and challenges. Environments 31 (2): 59–72.Google Scholar
Young, Oran Reed. 2002. The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zulkafli, Zed, Perez, Katya, Vitolo, Claudia, Buytaert, Wouter, Karpouzoglou, Timothy, Dewulf, Art, de Bievre, Bert, Clark, Julian, Hannah, David M., and Shaheed, Simrita. 2017. User-driven design of decision support systems for polycentric environmental resources management. Environmental Modelling & Software 88: 58–73.Google Scholar