Book contents
- Good Science
- Good Science
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Clearing the Ground
- Part II Good Science
- Part III Charting the Moral Geography of Psychological Research
- Book part
- Appendix A Instructor’s Guide
- Appendix B An Example Master’s-Level Curriculum
- Appendix C Questions to Aid Moral Reflection in Research Design
- References
- Index
- References
Appendix B - An Example Master’s-Level Curriculum
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 January 2022
Book contents
- Good Science
- Good Science
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Clearing the Ground
- Part II Good Science
- Part III Charting the Moral Geography of Psychological Research
- Book part
- Appendix A Instructor’s Guide
- Appendix B An Example Master’s-Level Curriculum
- Appendix C Questions to Aid Moral Reflection in Research Design
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Good SciencePsychological Inquiry as Everyday Moral Practice, pp. 156 - 170Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Fine, M. (2012). Troubling Calls for Evidence: A Critical Race, Class and Gender Analysis of Whose Evidence Counts. Feminism and Psychology, 22 (1), 3–19. doi:10.1177/0959353511435475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, D. (2016). The Baby Factory: Difficult Research Objects, Disciplinary Standards, and the Production of Statistical Significance. Socius, 2, 2378023115625071.Google Scholar
Arnett, J. J. (2009). The Neglected 95%: A Challenge to Psychology’s Philosophy of Science. American Psychologist, 64 (6), 571–574. doi:10.1037/a0016723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., and Simonsohn, U. (2016). False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant. In Kazdin, A. E. and Kazdin, A. E. (eds.), Methodological Issues and Strategies in Clinical Research, 4th ed. (pp. 547–555). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/14805-033.Google Scholar
Teo, T. (2010). What is Epistemological Violence in the Empirical Social Sciences? Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4 (5), 295–303. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00265.x.Google Scholar
Wiggins, B. J., and Chrisopherson, C. D. (2019). The Replication Crisis in Psychology: An Overview for Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 39 (4), 202–217.Google Scholar
Levitt, H. M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J. W., Frost, D. M., Josselson, R., and Suárez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Primary, Qualitative Meta-Analytic, and Mixed Methods Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report. American Psychologist, 73 (1), 26.Google Scholar
Giddings, L. S. (2006). Mixed-Methods Research: Positivism Dressed in Drag? Journal of Research in Nursing, 11 (3), 195–203. doi:10.1177/1744987106064635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L. T. (2014). Social Justice, Transformation and Indigenous Methodologies. In Rinehart, R. E., Barbour, K. N., Pope, C. C., Rinehart, R. 0., Barbour, K. 0., and Pope, C. 0. (eds.), Ethnographic Worldviews: Transformations and Social Justice (pp. 15–20). New York: Springer Science + Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6916-8_2.Google Scholar