Book contents
- Endorsements
- Global Shareholder Stewardship
- Global Shareholder Stewardship
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Part I Foundations
- Part II Jurisdictions
- 4 Shareholder Stewardship in the Netherlands
- 5 Capitalist Stakeholders
- 6 Institutional Investor Stewardship in Italian Corporate Governance
- 7 The Danish Stewardship Code
- 8 Stewardship Norwegian-Style
- 9 Stewardship and Shareholder Engagement in Germany
- 10 The Japanese Stewardship Code
- 11 Korea’s Stewardship Code and the Rise of Shareholder Activism
- 12 The Assessment of Taiwan’s Shareholder Stewardship Codes
- 13 Stewardship in the Hong Kong International Financial Centre
- 14 Singapore’s Embrace of Shareholder Stewardship
- 15 Institutional Investor Stewardship in Malaysia
- 16 The Thai Institutional Investors Stewardship Code and Its Implementation
- 17 Shareholder Stewardship in India
- 18 Institutional Investors in China
- 19 Stewardship and Collective Action
- 20 Stewardship Principles in Canada
- 21 The Uncertain Stewardship Potential of Index Funds
- 22 Encouraging Sustainable Investment in South Africa
- 23 Stewardship in Kenya
- 24 The Brazilian Stewardship Framework
- Part III Comparisons
- Index
10 - The Japanese Stewardship Code
Its Resemblance and Non-resemblance to the UK Code
from Part II - Jurisdictions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 April 2022
- Endorsements
- Global Shareholder Stewardship
- Global Shareholder Stewardship
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Part I Foundations
- Part II Jurisdictions
- 4 Shareholder Stewardship in the Netherlands
- 5 Capitalist Stakeholders
- 6 Institutional Investor Stewardship in Italian Corporate Governance
- 7 The Danish Stewardship Code
- 8 Stewardship Norwegian-Style
- 9 Stewardship and Shareholder Engagement in Germany
- 10 The Japanese Stewardship Code
- 11 Korea’s Stewardship Code and the Rise of Shareholder Activism
- 12 The Assessment of Taiwan’s Shareholder Stewardship Codes
- 13 Stewardship in the Hong Kong International Financial Centre
- 14 Singapore’s Embrace of Shareholder Stewardship
- 15 Institutional Investor Stewardship in Malaysia
- 16 The Thai Institutional Investors Stewardship Code and Its Implementation
- 17 Shareholder Stewardship in India
- 18 Institutional Investors in China
- 19 Stewardship and Collective Action
- 20 Stewardship Principles in Canada
- 21 The Uncertain Stewardship Potential of Index Funds
- 22 Encouraging Sustainable Investment in South Africa
- 23 Stewardship in Kenya
- 24 The Brazilian Stewardship Framework
- Part III Comparisons
- Index
Summary
Japan adopted its stewardship code in 2014, and revised it in 2017 and 2020. As it paid much attention each time to the UK Code, one might initially think that Japan was following in the UKʼs footsteps. However, although the Japanese Stewardship Code and the UK Stewardship Code bear superficial resemblance, their fundamental policy objectives are almost diametrically opposed. The UK Code aims to restrain excessive risk-taking and short-termism by making institutional investors more responsible to the public. Conversely, the Japanese Code intends to champion shareholders’ interests by making domestic institutional investors more active shareholders who exert pressure on entrenched management. This divergence can also be seen in the two countriesʼ stance on ESG factors in their respective latest revisions. While the 2020 UK Code revision emphasizes the importance of environmental and social issues, the 2020 Japanese Code revision requires that consideration of ESG factors must be consistent with institutional investors’ investment strategy. Such difference in the goals of these Codes shows that caution is needed when comparing the stewardship codes of different jurisdictions.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Global Shareholder Stewardship , pp. 222 - 238Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
- 2
- Cited by