Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-qzcqf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-03T23:24:37.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Civil Society, Social Media, and Political Messaging

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2025

Edited by
Valerie J. Bunce ,
Thomas B. Pepinsky ,
Rachel Beatty Riedl  and
Kenneth M. Roberts
Valerie J. Bunce
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Thomas B. Pepinsky
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Rachel Beatty Riedl
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Kenneth M. Roberts
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Global Challenges to Democracy
Comparative Perspectives on Backsliding, Autocracy, and Resilience
 , pp. 141 - 254
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

Acciari, Louisa (2021), “Practicing intersectionality: Brazilian domestic workers’ strategies of building alliances and mobilizing identity,” Latin American Research Review, 56 (1), 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, Sonia (1990), Engendering democracy in Brazil: Women’s movements in transition politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Armony, Ariel C. (2004), The dubious link: Civic engagement and democratization (Stanford: Stanford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Sheri (1997), “Civil society and the collapse of the Weimar Republic,” World Politics, 49 (3), 401–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biroli, Flávia (2016), “Political violence against women in Brazil: Expressions and definitions,” Revista Direito e Práxis, 7 (16), 557–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biroli, Flávia and Caminotti, Mariana (2020), “The conservative backlash against gender in Latin America,” Politics & Gender, 16 (1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blofield, Merike (2012), Care work and class: Domestic workers’ struggles for equal rights in Latin America (University Park,: The Pennsylvania State University Press).Google Scholar
Boas, Taylor (2021), “Expanding the public square: Evangelicals and electoral politics in Latin America,” in Kapiszewski, Diana, Levitsky, Steven, and Yashar, Deborah J. (eds.), The inclusionary turn in Latin American democracies (New York: Cambridge University Press), 362–97.Google Scholar
Boas, Taylor (2023), Evangelicals and electoral politics in Latin America: A kingdom of this world (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Taylor and Smith, Amy Erica (2019), “Looks like me, thinks like me: Descriptive representation and opinion congruence in Brazil,” Latin American Research Review, 54 (2), 310–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bob, Clifford (2012), The global right wing and the clash of world politics (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bob, Clifford (2019), Rights as weapons: Instruments of conflict, tools of power (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Bonner, Michelle (2013), “The politics of police image in Chile,” Journal of Latin American Studies, 45 (4), 669–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Teresa (2000), City of walls: Crime, segregation, and citizenship in São Paulo. (Berkeley: University of California Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Teresa (2002), “The paradox of police violence in democratic Brazil,” Ethnography, 3 (3), 235–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Teresa and Holston, James (1999), “Democracy and violence in Brazil,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 41 (4), 691–729.Google Scholar
Caminotti, Mariana and Tabbush, Constanza (2019), “Más allá del sexo: la ampliación de la oposición conservadora a las políticas de igualdad de género en América Latina,” LASA Forum, 51 (2), 27–31.Google Scholar
Chambers, Simone and Kopstein, Jeffrey (2001), “Bad civil society,” Political Theory, 29 (6), 837–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Jennifer (2014), “New left experiences in Bolivia and Ecuador and the challenge to theories of populism,” Journal of Latin American Studies, 46 (1), 59–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrales, Javier (2021), The politics of LGBTQ rights expansion in Latin America and the Caribbean (Cambridge Elements in Politics and Society in Latin America; New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Corredor, Elizabeth (2019), “Unpacking ‘gender ideology’ and the global right’s antigender countermovement,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 44 (3), 613–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corredor, Elizabeth (2021), “On the strategic uses of women’s rights: Backlash, rights-based framing, and anti-gender campaigns in Colombia’s 2016 peace agreement,” Latin American Politics and Society, 63 (3), 46–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
da Matta, Roberto (1987), “The quest for citizenship in a relational university,” in Wirth, John, Nunes, Edson, and Bogenschild, Thomas (eds.), State and society in Brazil: Continuity and change (Boulder: Westview Press), 307–35.Google Scholar
Daby, Mariela and Moseley, Mason (2022), “Feminist mobilization and the abortion debate in Latin America: Lessons from Argentina,” Politics & Gender, 18 (2), 359–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díez, Jordi (2015), The politics of gay marriage in Latin America (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, Kent (2008), “Paradoxes of police reform: Federalism, parties, and civil society in Argentina’s public security crisis,” Latin American Research Review, 43 (3), 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Encarnación, Omar (2016), Out in the periphery: Latin America’s gay rights revolution (Oxford University Press: New York).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewig, Christina (1999), “The strengths and limits of the NGO women’s movement model: Shaping Nicaragua’s democratic institutions,” Latin American Research Review, 34 (3), 75–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes, Claudio (2005), Contesting the iron fist: Advocacy networks and police violence in democratic Argentina and Chile (New York: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garay, Candelaria (2016), Social policy expansion in Latin America (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Edward (1996), Class and conservative parties: Argentina in comparative perspective (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
Glenn, Evelyn (2011), “Constructing citizenship,” American Sociological Review, 76 (1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, Tomás and Peña, Alejandro (2021), “The rise of the contentious right: Digitally intermediated linkage strategies in Argentina and Brazil,” Latin American Politics and Society, 63 (3), 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, Yanilda and Mayka, Lindsay (2023), “Policing, democratic participation, and the reproduction of asymmetric citizenship,” American Political Science Review, 117 (1), 263–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Sara (2019), “Liberal democracy, national identity boundaries, and populist entry points,” Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society, 31 (3), 377–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Sara (2022), Citizenship in hard times: How ordinary people respond to democratic threat (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Sara (2023), “Citizenship studies: Policy causes and consequences,” Annual Review of Political Science, 26, 135‒52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, Alisha (2013), “Right on crime? Conservative party politics and mano dura policies in El Salvador,” Latin American Research Review, 48 (1), 44–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holston, James (2008), Insurgent citizenship: Disjunctions of democracy and modernity in Brazil (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Holston, James (2011), “Contesting privilege with right: The transformation of differentiated citizenship in Brazil,” Citizenship Studies, 15 (3–4), 335–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummel, Calla (2017), “Disobedient markets: Street vendors, enforcement, and state intervention in collective action,” Comparative Political Studies, 50 (11), 1524–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummel, Calla (2022), Why informal workers organize: Contentious politics, enforcement, and the state (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hummel, Calla and Velasco-Guachalla, Ximena (2024), “Activists, parties, and the expansion of trans rights in Bolivia,” Comparative Politics, 56 (3), 321–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucero, José Antonio (2008), Struggles of voice: The politics of indigenous representation in the Andes (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo and Medel, Rodrigo (2023), “Uneven states, unequal societies, and democracy’s unfulfilled promises: Citizenship rights in Chile and contemporary Latin America,” Latin American Politics and Society, 65 (2), 170–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, T. H. (1950), Citizenship and social class (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Mayka, Lindsay (2021), “The power of human rights frames in urban security: Lessons from Bogotá,” Comparative Politics, 54 (1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayka, Lindsay and Smith, Amy Erica (2021), “The grassroots right in Latin America: Patterns, causes, and consequences,” Latin American Politics and Society, 63 (3), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Michael and Wood, Charles (1999), “Ironies of citizenship: Skin color, police brutality, and the challenge to democracy in Brazil,” Social Forces, 77 (3), 1001–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moncada, Eduardo (2022), Resisting extortion: Victims, criminals, and states in Latin America (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Lynn M. (2014), “Claiming Rosa Parks: Conservative Catholic bids for ‘rights’ in contemporary Latin America,” Culture, Health & Sexuality, 16 (10), 1245–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, Laura, Kerrigan, Deanna, and Paiva, Vera Silvia (2018), “Rites of resistance: Sex workers’ fight to maintain rights and pleasure in the centre of the response to HIV in Brazil,” Global Public Health, 14 (2), 1–15.Google ScholarPubMed
O’Donnell, Guillermo (1993), “On the state, democratization, and some conceptual problems: A Latin American view with glances at some postcommunist countries,” World Development, 21 (8), 1355–69.Google Scholar
Paschel, Tianna (2016), Becoming black political subjects: Movements and ethno-racial rights in Colombia and Brazil (Princeton: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Leigh (2000), Uncivil movements: The armed right wing and democracy in Latin America (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
Payne, Leigh and Santos, de Souza, Aruska, Andreza (2020), “The right-wing backlash in Brazil and beyond,” Politics & Gender, 16 (1), 32–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Leigh, Escoffier, Simón, and Zulver, Julia (eds.) (2023), The right against rights in Latin America (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuterswärd, Camilla (2021), “‘Pro-life’ and feminist mobilization in the struggle over abortion in Mexico: Church networks, elite alliances, and partisan context,” Latin American Politics and Society, 63 (3), 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, Jessica A.J., Mayka, Lindsay, and Montero, Alfred (2019), “The politics of participation in Latin America: New actors and institutions,” Latin American Politics and Society, 61 (2), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Stéphanie (2020), “Antigender activism in Peru and its impacts on state policy,” Politics & Gender, 16 (1), 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shklar, Judith (1991), American citizenship: The quest for inclusion (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Smith, Amy Erica and Boas, Taylor (2023), “Religion, sexuality politics, and the transformation of Latin American electorates,” British Journal of Political Science, 54 (3), 1–20.Google Scholar
Smith, Nicholas Rush (2015), “Rejecting rights: Vigilantism and violence in post-apartheid South Africa,” African Affairs, 114 (456), 341–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Rogers (1997), Civic ideals: Conflicting visions of citizenship in US history (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Sosa-Villagarcia, Paolo and Rozas, Urrunaga, Lucila (2021), “From the state to the streets: The debate over the civil union bill and conservative strategic change in Peru,” Bulletin of Latin American Research, 40 (5), 634–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, Ruth (2005), “Controlling the police in Buenos Aires: A case study of horizontal and societal accountability,” Bulletin of Latin American Research, 24 (1), 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thayer, Millie (2009), Making transnational feminism: Rural women, NGO activists, and northern donors in Brazil (New York: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ungar, Mark (2011), Policing democracy: Overcoming obstacles to citizen security in Latin America (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaggione, Juan Marco (2005), “Reactive politicization and religious dissidence: The political mutations of the religious,” Social Theory and Practice, 31 (2), 233–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cott, Van, Lee, Donna (2005), From movements to parties in Latin America: The evolution of ethnic politics (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, Shannon Drysdale and Xydias, Christina (2014), “Women’s organizing and intersectional policy-making in comparative perspective: Evidence from Guatemala and Germany,” Politics, Groups, and Identities 2(4), 549–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Bruce and Gianella, Camila (2019), “Overcoming the limits of legal opportunity structures: LGBT rights’ forking paths in Costa Rica and Colombia,” Latin American Politics and Society, 61 (2), 138–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yashar, Deborah J. (2005), Contesting citizenship in Latin America: The rise of indigenous movements and the postliberal challenge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris Marion (2011), Justice and the politics of difference (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Ziblatt, Daniel (2017), Conservative parties and the birth of democracy (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Bencze, Áron. 2003. “Szeretem, mert Magor”: Beszélgetés Usztics Mátyással (“I love it because it’s Magor”: conversation with Mátyás Usztics. September 19 https://tinyurl.com/2s42er8n.Google Scholar
Beramendi, Pablo, Häusermann, Silja, Kitschelt, Herbert, and Kriesi, Hanspeter, eds. 2015. The Politics of Advanced Capitalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohle, Dorothee and Greskovits, Béla. 2019. “Politicizing Embedded Neoliberalism: Continuity and Change in Hungary’s Development Model,” West European Politics, 42, 5: 1069–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornschier, Simon and Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2013. “The Populist Right, the Working Class, and the Changing Face of Class Politics.” In: Rydgren, Jens ed. Class Politics and the Radical Right, London and New York: Routledge, 10–30.Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie and Wolchik, Sharon. 2011. Defeating Authoritarian Leaders in Postcommunist Countries. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidron, Noam and Hall, Peter. 2017. “The Politics of Social Status: Economic and Cultural Roots of the Populist Right,” The British Journal of Sociology, 68, S1: 57–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Götz, Norbert. 2015. “‛Moral Economy’: Its Conceptual History and Analytical Prospects,” Journal of Global Ethics, 11, 2: 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Greskovits, Béla. 2020. “Rebuilding the Hungarian Right through Conquering Civil Society: The Civic Circles Movement,” East European Politics, 36, 2: 247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greskovits, Béla and Wittenberg, Jason. 2016. Civil Society and Democratic Consolidation in Hungary in the 1990s and 2000s. Unpublished Manuscript. February 26.Google Scholar
Halász, Csilla. 2004. Kinek az Élete? (Whose life?) Interview with Csaba Hende. Heti Válasz. February 27.Google Scholar
Häusermann, Silja and Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2015. “What Do Voters Want? Dimensions and Configurations in Individual-Level Preferences and Party Choice.” In: Beramendi, Pablo, Häusermann, Silja, Kitschelt, Herbert, and Kriesi, Hanspeter eds. The Politics of Advanced Capitalism, New York: Cambridge University Press, 202–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschman, Albert. O. 1981. “The Changing Tolerance for Income Inequality in the Course of Economic Development.” In his Essays in Trespassing: Economics to Politics and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 39–58.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbeth and Marks, Gary. 2018. “Cleavage Theory Meets Europe’s Crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the Transnational Cleavage,” Journal of European Public Policy, 25, 1: 109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald F. and Norris, Pippa. 2016. Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash. Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP 16–026, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Cambridge MA, August.Google Scholar
Kapcsándi, Dóra. 2002. 150 milliárdba kerül a száznapos program (The 100-day program costs 150 billion) www.origo.hu/itthon/20020610150milliardba.html.Google Scholar
Laki, Mihály and Szalai, Júlia. 2015. Tíz évvel később: magyar nagyvállalkozók európai környezetben (Ten Years After: Hungarian Large Entrepreneurs in a European Environment) Budapest: Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas. 2021. “Populism in Europe: An Illiberal Democratic Response to Undemocratic Liberalism (The Government and Opposition/Leonard Schapiro Lecture 2019),” Government and Opposition, 56, 4 (October): 577–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orbán, Viktor. 2002. Orbán Viktor beszéde a Dísz Téren (Viktor Orbán’s Speech at Dísz Square). May 7 http://mkdsz1.freeweb.hu/n22/orban020507.html.Google Scholar
Orbán, Viktor. 2006. Vízválasztó 3. (Watershed 3.) Magyar Nemzet. September 9.Google Scholar
Orbán, Viktor. 2019. Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s speech at the “Tourism Summit 2019” conference. October 28. https://miniszterelnok.hu/tag/turizmus-summit/.Google Scholar
Orbán, Viktor. 2022. Orbán Viktor beszéde a Fidesz–KDNP választási győzelmét követően (Viktor Orbán’s speech after the election victory of Fidesz‒KDNP). April 3 https://tinyurl.com/rtacknpw.Google Scholar
Pethő, András. 2009. “Így tették lejtőre Magyarországot I-II” (This is how Hungary was brought down) https://tinyurl.com/2fkzep3t ; and https://tinyurl.com/3298z48f.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. [1944] 1957. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Pryke, Sam. 2012. “Economic Nationalism: Theory, History and Prospects,” Global Policy, 3, 3: 281–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rustow, Dankwart. 1970. “Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model,” Comparative Politics, 2, 3: 337‒363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda and Williamson, Vanessa. 2012. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swedberg, Richard. 2003. Principles of Economic Sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 2011. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Edward. P. 1971. “The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century,” Past and Present, 50: 76–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. [1904–05] 1958. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: Scribner’s.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. [1915] 1946. “The Social Psychology of World Religions.” In: Gerth, Hans and Mills, Charles Wright eds. From Max Weber, New York: Oxford University Press, 267–301.Google Scholar

References

Abbott, A. (2019). Hungarians Protest against Proposed Government Takeover of Science. Nature [online] (05 June). www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01756-9 [Accessed May 23, 2022].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, G. & Verba, S.. (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, D. (2019). Citizenship and Contemporary Direct Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Art, D. (2007). Reacting to the Radical Right: Lessons from Germany and Austria, Party Politics, 13(3), 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachrach, P. (1967). The Theory of Democratic Elitism: A Critique. New York: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Bakke, E. & Sitter, N.. (2022). The EU’s Enfants Terribles: Democratic Backsliding in Central Europe since 2010, Perspectives on Politics, 20(1), 22–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bánkuti, M., Halmai, G., & Lane Scheppele, K.. (2012). Hungary’s Illiberal Turn: Disabling the Constitution, Journal of Democracy, 23(3), 138‒146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazsofy, R. & Goat, E.. 2019. Fresh Evidence of Hungary Vote-Rigging Raises Concerns of Fraud in European Elections. openDemocracy. https://tinyurl.com/4u42jey2.Google Scholar
Berman, S. (1997). Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic, World Politics, 59(3), 401‒29.Google Scholar
Bernhard, M. (2016). The Moore Thesis: What’s Left after 1989? Democratization, 23(1), 118‒140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhard, M. (2020). What Do We Know about Civil Society and Regime Change after 1989? East European Politics, 36(3), 341‒362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhard, M. & Edgell, A. B.. (2022). Democracy and Social Forces. In Coppedge, M., Edgell, A. B., Knutsen, C. H., and Lindberg, S. I., eds., Why Democracies Develop and Decline. New York: Cambridge University Press, 185‒214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhard, M., Jung, D., Tzelgov, E., Coppedge, M., & Lindberg, S. I.. (2017) Making Embedded Knowledge Transparent: How the V-Dem Dataset Opens New Vistas in Civil Society Research, Perspectives on Politics, 15(2), 342–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhard, M., Hicken, A., Reenock, C., & Lindberg, S. I.. (2020). Parties, Civil Society, and the Deterrence of Democratic Defection, Studies in Comparative International Development, 55(1), 1‒21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugarič, B & Ginsburg, T.. (2016). The Assault on Postcommunist Courts, Journal of Democracy, 27(3), 69‒82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunce, V. J. & Wolchik, S. L.. (2011). Defeating Authoritarian Leaders in Postcommunist Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capoccia, G. (2005). Defending Democracy: Reactions to Extremism in Interwar Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. A., Martin, S. B., & Pister, K.. (1997). Associative Networks: New Structures of Representation for the Popular Sectors? In Chalmers, D. A., Vilas, C. M., Hite, K., Martin, S. B., Piester, K., & Segarra, M., eds., The New Politics of Inequality in Latin America: Rethinking Participation and Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 543‒582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, S. & Kopstein, J.. (2001). Bad Civil Society, Political Theory, 29(6), 838–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, S. & Kopstein, J.. (2022). Wrecking the Public Sphere: The New Authoritarians’ Digital Attack on Pluralism and Truth, Constellations, 30(3), 225‒240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, A. (2017). Pluralism under Attack: The Assault on Press Freedom in Poland. Washington, DC: Freedom House.Google Scholar
Cornell, A. & Grimes, M.. (2015). Institutions As Incentives for Civic Action: Bureaucratic Structures, Civil Society, and Disruptive Protests, The Journal of Politics, 77(3), 664‒678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, A., Møller, J., & Skaaning, S.. (2020). Democratic Stability in an Age of Crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dragomir, M. (2017). The State of Hungarian Media: Endgame. LSE Media Policy Project [online]. https://tinyurl.com/y6umaxtp [Accessed March 25, 2023].Google Scholar
Ekiert, G. (2019). The Dark Side of Civil Society. Concilium Civitas [online]. www.conciliumcivitas.pl/en/almanac/item/97-the-dark-side-of-civil-society [Accessed September 1, 2019].Google Scholar
Ekiert, G. & Perry, E.J.. (2020). State Mobilized Movements: A Research Agenda. In Ekiert, G., Perry, E. J., & Yan, X., eds., Ruling by Other Means: State-Mobilized Movements. Cambridge Studies in Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1‒23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enyedi, Z. (2018). Democratic Backsliding and Academic Freedom in Hungary, Perspectives on Politics, 16(4), 1067‒1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ésik, S. (2024). Viktor Orbán’s Newest Tool for Crushing Dissent. Journal of Democracy [online]. https://tinyurl.com/y5jmj4xz [Accessed March 15, 2024].Google Scholar
Fish, M. S. (1998). The Determinants of Economic Reform in the Post-Communist World, East European Politics and Societies, 12(1), 31‒78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foa, R. & Ekiert, G.. (2017). The Weakness of Postcommunist Civil Society Reassessed, European Journal of Political Research, 56(2), 419‒439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedom House. (2023). Nations in Transit 2023: War Deepens a Regional Divide. Washington, DC: Freedom House.Google Scholar
Gilens, M. & Page, B. I.. (2014). Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens, Perspectives on Politics, 12(3), 564–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graff, A. & Korolczuk, E.. (2021). Anti-Gender Politics in the Populist Moment. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greskovits, B. (2020). Rebuilding the Hungarian Right through Conquering Civil Society: The Civic Circles Movement, East European Politics, 36(2), 247‒266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, A. (2002). Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guasti, P. (2020). Populism in Power and Democracy: Democratic Decay and Resilience in the Czech Republic (2013–2020), Politics and Governance, 8(4), 473–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellmeier, S. & Bernhard, M.. (2023). Regime Transformation from Below: Mobilization for Democracy and Autocracy from 1900 to 2021, Comparative Political Studies, 56(12), 1858–1890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, V. & Shorter, J.. (2018). Hungary “Slave Law” Protest Shows Strains of Economic Model. Financial Times (20 December) [online]. https://tinyurl.com/22sdtnucwww.ft.com/content/609e64c4-03a3-11e9-99df-6183d3002ee1 [Accessed May 23, 2022].Google Scholar
Howard, M. (2003). The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwicz, L. (2008). But Who Will Guard the Guardians? American Economic Review, 98(3), 577–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R. & Welzel, C.. (2005). Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jovanović, S. M. (2019). “One out of Five Million”: Serbia’s 2018‒19 Protests against Dictatorship, the Media, and the Government’s Response, Open Political Science, 2 (1), 1‒8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelemen, R. D. (2017). Europe’s Other Democratic Deficit: National Authoritarianism in Europe’s Democratic Union, Government and Opposition, 52(2), 211–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler-Koch, B. (2010). Civil Society and EU Democracy: “Astroturf” Representation? Journal of European Public Policy, 17(1), 100‒116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopecký, P. (2003). Civil Society, Uncivil Society and Contentions Politics in Post-Communist Europe. In Kopecký, P. & Mudde, C., eds., Uncivil Society? Contentious Politics in Post-Communist Europe. London: Routledge, 1‒18.Google Scholar
Korolczuk, E. & Jacobsson, K. (2017). In Korolczuk, E and Jacobsson, K, eds., Civil Society Revisited: Lessons from Poland. New York: Berghahn Books, preface, viii‒xi.Google Scholar
Korolczuk, E., Kowalska, B., Snochowska- Gonzalez, C., & Ramme, J., eds. (2019). Bunt kobiet: czarne protesty I strajki kobiet. Gdańsk: Europejskie Centrum Solidarności.Google Scholar
Kotwas, M. & Kubik, J.. (2019). Symbolic Thickening of Public Culture and the Rise of Right-Wing Populism in Poland, East European Politics and Societies, 33(2), 435‒471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kucharczyk, J. & Fomina, J.. (2016). The Specter Haunting Europe: Populism and Protest in Poland, Journal of Democracy, 27(4), 58‒68.Google Scholar
Linz, J. (1978). Crisis, Breakdown, and Reequilibration. In Linz, J. & Stepan, A., eds., The Breakdown of Democratic Regime. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1‒97.Google Scholar
Linz, J. (1990). The Perils of Presidentialism, Journal of Democracy, 1(1), 51‒69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, J. & Stepan, A.. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy, American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69‒105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowi, T. (1979). The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States. 2nd ed. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Lührmann, A., Marquandt, K. L., & Mechkova, V.. (2020). Constraining Governments: New Indices of Vertical, Horizontal, and Diagonal Accountability, American Political Science Review, 114 (3), 811–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magyar, B. & Madlovics, B.. (2022). Hungary 2022: Election Manipulation and the Regime’s Attempts at Electoral Fraud. CEU Democracy Institute [online]. https://tinyurl.com/5b6e2p4r [Accessed March 31, 2022].Google Scholar
McAdam, D.v & Tarrow, S.. (2010). Ballots and Barricades: On the Reciprocal Relationship between Elections and Social Movements, Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 529‒542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, P. (2023). Young, Female Voters Were the Key to Defeating Populists in Poland’s Election. The Conversation [online]. https://tinyurl.com/2s4hurt8 [Accessed March 15, 2024].Google Scholar
Merkel, W. (2004). Embedded and Defective Democracies, Democratization 11(5), 33‒58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Migdal, J. S. (1988). Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2018). Explaining Eastern Europe: Romania’s Italian-Style Anticorruption Populism, Journal of Democracy, 29(3), 104‒116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C., Summerhill, W., & Weingast, B.. (2000). Order, Disorder, and Economic Change: Latin America versus North America. In Bueno de Mesquita, B. and Root, H., eds., Governing for Prosperity. New Haven: Yale University Press, 17‒58.Google Scholar
Notz, A. (2018). How to Abolish Democracy: Electoral System, Party Regulation and Opposition Rights in Hungary and Poland. Verfassungsblog [online]. https://tinyurl.com/4dfypz6d [Accessed October 1, 2023].Google Scholar
O’Donnell, G. (1994). Delegative Democracy, Journal of Democracy, 5(1), 55‒69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, G. (1998). Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies, Journal of Democracy, 9(3), 112‒126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OSCE. (2022). Hungary, Parliamentary Elections and Referendum, 3 April 2022: Statement of Preliminary Findings and Conclusions. www.osce.org/odihr/elections/hungary/515111 [Accessed May 22, 2022].Google Scholar
Pešić, J. & Petrović, J.. (2020). The Role and the Positioning of the Left in Serbia’s “One of Five Million” Protests. Balkanologie [online] 15(2). http://journals.openedition.org/balkanologie/2576 [Accessed May 23, 2022].Google Scholar
Popielec, D. (2017). Afera taśmowa z 2014 roku jako przykład politycznego podziału w mediach: studium przypadku, Polityka i Społeczeństwo, 4(15), 72‒81.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. (1991). Democracy and the Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, A., Stokes, S. C., & Manin, B.. (1999). Democracy, Accountability and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ptak, A. (2023). Poland’s Election Exit Poll in Charts. Notes from Poland. https://notesfrompoland.com/2023/10/16/polands-election-exit-poll-in-charts/ [Accessed March 15, 2024].Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Raskin, J. B. (2004). Overruling Democracy: The Supreme Court versus the American People. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, D. J. (2010). The Civic Foundations of Fascism in Europe: Italy, Spain, and Romania 1870–1945. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadurski, W. (2019). Poland’s Constitutional Breakdown. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, G. (1994). Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives, and Outcomes. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Schedler, A. 2006. The Logic of Electoral Authoritarianism. In Schedler, A., ed., Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1‒23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, M. S. & Carey, J. M.. (1992). Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seleny, A. (2014). Revolutionary Road: 1956 and the Fracturing of Hungarian Historical Memory. In Bernhard, M. & Kubik, J., eds., Twenty Years after Communism: The Politics of Memory and Commemoration. New York: Oxford University Press, 37‒59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ślarzyński, M. (2018). Rola klubów Gazety Polskiej w sukcesie politycznym Prawa i Sprawiedliwości w 2015 roku. Aktorzy lokalni czy actor ogólnokrajowej sfery publicznej III RP? Przegląd Socjolgiczny, 67(2), 139‒158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smulovitz, C. & Peruzzotti, E.. (2000). Societal Accountability in Latin America, Journal of Democracy, 11(4), 147‒158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vachudova, M. A. (2005). Europe Undivided. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vachudova, M. A. (2020). Ethnopopulism and Democratic Backsliding in Central Europe, East European Politics, 36(3), 318‒340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, C. (2016). The Authoritarian Threat: The Hijacking of Soft Power, Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 49‒63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, M. L. (2017). Going to the Ground (or AstroTurf): A Grassroots View of Regime Resilience, Democratization, 24(2), 265‒282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. (2024). World Development Indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators [Accessed November 19, 2024].Google Scholar

References

Acemoglu, Daron. 2017. “We Are the Last Defense against Trump.” Foreign Policy, January 18 (https://tinyurl.com/3aecvjet).Google Scholar
Andersen, Kristi. 2022. “Progressive Grassroots Organizing (2016–2020).” In Perry, Luke, ed., The 2020 Presidential Election: Key Issues and Regional Dynamics. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan: 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakke, Elisabeth, and Sitter, Nick. 2022. “The EU’s Enfants Terribles: Democratic Backsliding in Central Europe since 2010.” Perspectives on Politics 20, 1: 22–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basu, Amrita. 2021. “Prefiguring Alternatives to Autocratization: Democratic Dissent in Contemporary India.” In Widmalm, Sten, ed., Routledge Handbook of Autocratization in South Asia. London, UK: Routledge: 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Michael W. and Becker, Stefan. 2020. “Democratic Backsliding, Populism, and Public Administration.” Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 3, 1: 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beissinger, Mark R. 2002. The Revolutionary City: Urbanization and the Global Transformation of Rebellion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance and Segerberg, Alexandra. 2013. The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Sheri. 1997. “Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic.” World Politics 49, 3: 401–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermeo, Nancy. 2016. “On Democratic Backsliding.” Journal of Democracy 27, 1: 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhard, Michael. 2021. “Democratic Backsliding in Poland and Hungary.” Slavic Review 80, 3: 585–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael, Bernhard, Hicken, Allen, Reenock, Christopher, and Lindberg, Staffan I.. 2020. “Parties, Civil Society, and the Deterrence of Democratic Defection.” Studies in Comparative International Development 55, 4: 1–26.Google Scholar
Buben, Radek and Kouba, Karel. 2020. “Nicaragua in 2019: The Surprising Resilience of Authoritarianism in the Aftermath of Regime Crisis.” Revista de Ciencia Política 40, 2: 431–455.Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie J. and Wolchik, Sharon L.. 2011. Defeating Authoritarian Leaders in Postcommunist Countries. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceban, Elena. 2015. “Democratic Awakening in Macedonia: Expecting the Unexpected.” Journal of Global Politics and Current Diplomacy 3, 1: 23–33.Google Scholar
Conaghan, Catherine M. 2016. “Delegative Democracy Revisited: Ecuador under Correa.” Journal of Democracy 27, 3: 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, Michael et al. 2022. “VDem Dataset v12,” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemds22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Dana R. 2019. American Resistance: From the Women’s March to the Blue Wave. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamboa, Laura. 2017. “Opposition at the Margins: Strategies against the Erosion of Democracy in Colombia and Venezuela.” Comparative Politics 49, 4: 457–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamboa, Laura. 2022. Resisting Backsliding: Opposition Strategies against the Erosion of Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, Jennifer. 2019. “The Institutional Roots of Democratic Backsliding.” The Journal of Politics 81, 1 https://doi.org/10.1086/700653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Guadilla, María Pilar. 2004. “Civil Society: Institutionalization, Fragmentation, Autonomy.” In Ellner, Steve and Hellinger, Daniel, eds., Venezuelan Politics in the Chávez Era. London, UK: Lynne Rienner: 179–196.Google Scholar
Giugni, Marco. 1999. “How Social Movements Matter: Past Research, Present Problems, Future Developments.” In Giugni, Marco, McAdam, Doug, and Tilly, Charles, eds., How Social Movements Matter. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press: xiii–xxxiii.Google Scholar
Goldstone, Jack A. and Tilly, Charles. 2001. “Threat (and Opportunity): Popular Action and State Response in the Dynamics of Contentious Action.” In Aminzade, Ron et al., eds., Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press: 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greskovits, Béla. 2015. “The Hollowing and Backsliding of Democracy in East Central Europe.” Global Policy 6: 28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, Anna and Monika, Nalepa. 2022. “How Illiberal Populists Gain and Stay in Power: Programmatic Cohesion and Government Performance.” Unpublished paper (https://tinyurl.com/y8d8ejr5).Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan and Kaufman, Robert. 2021. Backsliding: Democratic Regress in the Contemporary World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Kirk A. 2016. “Responding to Radical Populism: Chavismo in Venezuela.” Democratization 23, 2: 242–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurečková, Adéla. 2021. “The End of the Babiš Era? The Czech Republic between the Past and the Future.” Heinrich Boll Stiftung, October 19 (https://tinyurl.com/ttycupme).Google Scholar
Krizsan, Andrea and Roggeband, Conny. 2018. “Towards a Conceptual Framework for Struggles over Democracy in Backsliding States: Gender Equality Policy in Central Eastern Europe.” Politics and Governance 6, 3: 90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korolczuk, Elżbieta. 2016. “Explaining Mass Protests against Abortion Ban in Poland: The Power of Connective Action.” Zoon politikon 7, 7: 91–113.Google Scholar
Laebens, Melis G. and Lührmann, Anna. 2021. “What Halts Democratic Erosion? The Changing Role of Accountability.” Democratization 28, 5: 908–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane Scheppele, Kim. 2018. “Autocratic Legalism.” The University of Chicago Law Review 85, 2: 545–584.Google Scholar
Lang, Marissa J. 2020. “‘Nobody Needs Another Pink Hat’: Why the Women’s March Is Struggling for Relevance.” The Washington Post, January 12 (https://tinyurl.com/3nhm2z9v).Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Way, Lucan A.. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2018. How Democracies Die. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
McCoy, Jennifer L. and Somer, Murat. 2019. “Toward a Theory of Pernicious Polarization and How It Harms Democracies: Comparative Evidence and Possible Remedies.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 681, 1: 234–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mickey, Robert, Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan A.. 2017. “Is America Still Safe for Democracy: Why the United States Is in Danger of Backsliding.” Foreign Affairs 96, 3: 20‒29.Google Scholar
Mietzner, Marcus. 2021. “Sources of Resistance to Democratic Decline: Indonesian Civil Society and Its Trials.” Democratization 28, 1: 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, Ádám C. 2016. “The Taming of Civil Society.” In Magyar, Bálint and Vásárhelyi, Júlia, eds., Twenty-Five Sides of a Post-Communist Mafia State. Budapest: Central European Press: 559–574.Google Scholar
Resnick, Danielle. 2022. “How Zambia’s Opposition Won.” Journal of Democracy 33, 1: 70–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedler, Andreas. 2019. “What Do We Know about Resistance to Democratic Subversion?” Annals of Comparative Democratization 17, 1: 4–7.Google Scholar
Shin, Soon-ok. 2020. “The Rise and Fall of Park Geun-hye: The Perils of South Korea’s Weak Party System.” The Pacific Review 33, 1: 153–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitter, Nick and Bakke, Elisabeth. 2019. “Democratic Backsliding in the European Union.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics (https://tinyurl.com/mrxhfswj).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, Putnam, Lara, and Tervo, Caroline. 2020. “Citizen Activism and the Democratic Party.” In Skocpol, Theda and Tervo, Caroline, eds., Upending American Politics: Polarizing Parties, Ideological Elites, and Citizen Activists from the Tea Party to the Anti-Trump Resistance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press: 283–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murat, Somer, McCoy, Jennifer L., and Luke, Russell E.. 2021. “Pernicious Polarization, Autocratization and Opposition Strategies.” Democratization 28, 5: 929–948.Google Scholar
Svolik, Milan W. 2020. “When Polarization Trumps Civic Virtue: Partisan Conflict and the Subversion of Democracy by Incumbents.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 15, 1: 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vachudova, Milada Anna. 2020. “Ethnopopulism and Democratic Backsliding in Central Europe.” East European Politics 36, 3: 318–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2024. Democracy’s Resilience to Populism’s Threat: Countering Global Alarmism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Jonas. 2020. “The Turbulent End of an Era in Bolivia: Contested Elections, the Ouster of Evo Morales, and the Beginning of a Transition towards an Uncertain Future.” Revista de Ciencia Política 40, 2: 163–186.Google Scholar
Wouters, Ruud. 2019. “The Persuasive Power of Protest: How Protest Wins Public Support.” Social Forces 98, 1: 403–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Albertson, B. and Guiler, K. (2020). “Conspiracy Theories, Election Rigging, and Support for Democratic Norms.” Research & Politics 7 (3): 2053168020959859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altay, S., de Araujo, E., and Mercier, H. (2022). “‘If This Account Is True, It Is Most Enormously Wonderful’: Interestingness-If-True and the Sharing of True and False News.” Digital Journalism, 10 (3): 373–394. www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21670811.2021.1941163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C. J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T., and Listhaug, A. (2005). Loser’s Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aral, S. (2020). The Hype Machine. New York, NY: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar
Arceneaux, K. and Truex, R. (2022). “Donald Trump and the Lie.” Perspectives on Politics 21 (3): 863‒879. doi:10.1017/S1537592722000901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashok, D., Luceri, L., Badaway, A., and Ferrara, E. (2019). Perils and Challenges of Social Media and Election Manipulation Analysis: The 2018 US Midterms. In Companion Proceedings of the 2019 World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2019). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308560.3316486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bail, C. A., Guay, B., Maloney, E., Combs, A., Sunshine Hillygus, D., Merhout, F., Freelon, D., and Volfovsky, A. (2019). “Assessing the Russian Internet Research Agency’s Impact on the Political Attitudes and Behaviors of American Twitter Users in Late 2017.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 (1): 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1906420116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bail, C. A. (2016). “Emotional Feedback and the Viral Spread of Social Media Messages about Autism Spectrum Disorders.” American Journal of Public Health 106 (7):1173–1180. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bayer, J. (2021). Policies and Measures to Counter Disinformation in Germany: The Power of Informational Communities.” Heinrich Böll Stiftung, October 13. https://tinyurl.com/mtbejmxw.Google Scholar
Bartels, L., Daxecker, U. E., Hyde, S. D., Lindberg, S. I., and Noorudin, I. (2023). “The Forum: Global Challenges to Democracy? Perspectives on Democratic Backsliding.” International Studies Review. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viad019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belanger, E. (2017). “Political Trust and Voting Behavior.” In Handbook on Political Trust. Eds Zmerli, S. and van der Meer, T. W. G. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, chapter 15.Google Scholar
Benkler, Y., Faris, R., and Roberts, H. (2018). Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. New York, NY: Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190923624.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlinski, N., Doyle, M., Guess, A., Levy, G., Lyons, B., Montgomery, J., Nyhan, B., and Reifler, J. (2021). “The Effects of Unsubstantiated Claims of Voter Fraud on Confidence in Elections.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 10 (1): 34–49. doi:10.1017/XPS.2021.18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, S. and Allyn, B. (2021). How the ‘Stop the Steal’ Movement Outwitted Facebook Ahead of the Jan. 6 Insurrection. NPR, October 22. www.npr.org/2021/10/22/1048543513/facebook-groups-jan-6-insurrection.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, S. and Howard, P. N. (2019). The Global Disinformation Order: 2019 Global Inventory of Organised Social Media Manipulation. Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. 207. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/207.Google Scholar
Brattberg, E. and Maurer, T. (2018). Russian Election Interference: Europe’s Counter to Fake News and Cyber Attacks. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Brief. May. https://tinyurl.com/yryrv5dr.Google Scholar
Brennan Center. (2022). https://tinyurl.com/y6k6nntz.Google Scholar
Brulle, R. J., Carmichael, J., and Jenkins, J. C. (2012). “Shifting Public Opinion on Climate Change: An Empirical Assessment of Factors Influencing Concern over Climate Change in the US, 2002–2010.” Climatic Change 114 (2): 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cederberg, G. (2018). Catching Swedish Phish: How Sweden Is Protecting Its 2018 Elections. Cambridge: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School. https://tinyurl.com/2abxxkjm.Google Scholar
Chadwick, A., Vaccari, C., and O’Loughlin, B. (2018). “Do Tabloids Poison the Well of Social Media? Explaining Democratically Dysfunctional News Sharing.” New Media & Society 20 (11): 4255–4274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Sin, S. C. J., Theng, Y. L., and Lee, C. S. (2015). Why Do Social Media Users Share Misinformation? In Proceedings of the 15th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries,111‒114. ACM.Google Scholar
Cheeseman, N., Fisher, J., Hitchen, J., and Hassan, I. (2020). “Social Media Disruption: Nigeria’s WhatsApp Politics.” Journal of Democracy 31 (3): 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cirone, A. and Hobbs, W. (2023). “Asymmetric Flooding as a Tool for Foreign Influence on Social Media.” Political Science Research and Methods 11 (1): 160–171. doi:10.1017/psrm.2022.9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, K., Davis, N. T., Nyhan, B., Porter, E., Ryan, T. J., and Wood, T. J. (2021). “Elite Rhetoric Can Undermine Democratic Norms.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (23): e2024125118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coleman, S. (2012). “Believing the News: From Sinking Trust to Atrophied Efficacy.” European Journal of Communication 27 (1): 35–45. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0267323112438806 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couzigou, I. (2021). “The French Legislation against Digital Information Manipulation in Electoral Campaigns: A Scope Limited by Freedom of Expression.” Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy 20 (1): 98–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, J., Simmons, C., and Bhatnagar, R. (2023). How January 6 Inspired Election Disinformation around the World. Institute for Strategic Dialogue, January 3. https://tinyurl.com/4vsrrzx9.Google Scholar
Crime and Security Research Institute. (2021). China-Linked Influence Operation on Twitter Detected Engaging with the Presidential Election. https://crimeandsecurity.org/feed/china-linked-io-us-2020.Google Scholar
Darcy, O. (2020). Fox News Hosts Sow Distrust in Legitimacy of Election. CNN Business, November 5. www.cnn.com/2020/11/05/media/fox-news-prime-time-election/index.html.Google Scholar
Davis, N. T., Goidel, K., and Zhao, Y. (2021). “The Meanings of Democracy among Mass Publics.” Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement 153 (3): 849–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiResta, R., Shaffer, D., Ruppel, B., Sullivan, D., Matney, R., Fox, R., Albright, D., and Johnson, B. (2019). “The Tactics & Tropes of the Internet Research Agency.” https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/senatedocs/2/.Google Scholar
Donovan, J., Dreyfuss, E., and Friedberg, B. (2022). Meme Wars: The Untold Story of the Online Battles Upending Democracy in America. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Dourado, T. and Salgado, S. (2021). “Disinformation in the Brazilian Pre-Election context: Probing the Content, Spread and Implications of Fake News About Lula da Silva.” The Communication Review 24 (4): 297–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2021.1981705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eady, G., Paskhalis, T., Zilinsky, J. et al. (2023). “Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency Foreign Influence Campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US Election and Its Relationship to Attitudes and Voting Behavior.” Nature Communications 14 (62). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35576-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, B. (2020). “Why It Is So Difficult to Regulate Disinformation Online.” In The Disinformation Age. SSRC Anxieties of Democracy. Eds Bennett, W. L. and Livingston, S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 190‒210.Google Scholar
Etter, L. (2017). What Happens When the Government Uses Facebook as a Weapon? Bloomberg, December 7. https://tinyurl.com/55muvd2n.Google Scholar
Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B., and Reifler, J. (2017). “The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs About Politics.” Advances in Political Psychology 38: 127‒150. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funke, D. (2019). India’s Election Ends This Week. And at Least One Political Party Is Spreading Hoaxes about Voter Fraud. Pointer. May 23. https://tinyurl.com/mt54y5p4.Google Scholar
Fortin-Rittberger, J., Harfst, P., and Dingler, S. C. (2017). “The Costs of Electoral Fraud: Establishing the Link between Electoral Integrity, Winning an Election, and Satisfaction with Democracy.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 27 (3): 350–368. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5546066/.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fukuyama, F. and Grotto, A. (2020). “Comparative Media Regulation in the United States and Europe.” In Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field, Prospects for Reform (SSRC Anxieties of Democracy). Eds Persily, N and Tucker, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 199‒219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goel, S., Anderson, A., Hofman, J., and Watts, D. J. (2016). “The Structural Virality of Online Diffusion.” Management Science 62 (1): 180–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowen, A. and Dwoskin, E. (2018). WhatsApp Launches New Controls after Widespread App-Fuelled Mob Violence in India. Washington Post, July 19. https://tinyurl.com/y64kr9zv.Google Scholar
Grounds, K. and Goff, M. (2022). Disinformation, Disruption, and the Shifting Media Ecosystem in the 2022 Philippines Election. Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada, May 5 https://tinyurl.com/jzrvj6rr .Google Scholar
Gunitsky, S. (2015). “Corrupting the Cyber-Commons: Social Media as a Tool of Autocratic Stability.” Perspectives on Politics 13 (1): 42–54. doi:10.1017/S1537592714003120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassan, I. (2019). How Fake News Spreads, Sowing Distrust Ahead of Nigeria’s Elections. African Arguments. https://africanarguments.org/2019/01/31/nigeria-fake-news-2019-election/.Google Scholar
Howard, P. N., Ganesh, B., Liotsiou, D., Kelly, J., and Francois, C. (2018). The IRA, Social Media and Political Polarization in the United States, 2012–2018. University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Humprecht, E., Esser, F., and van Aelst, P. (2020). “Resilience to Online Disinformation: A Framework for Cross-National Comparative Research.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 25 (3): 493–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, T. “Amendment of Section 230.” (2020). In Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field, Prospects for Reform (SSRC Anxieties of Democracy). Eds Persily, N. and Tucker, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 252. doi:10.1017/9781108890960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S. J., Bailey, M., and Foucault Welles, B. (2020). #HashtagActivism: Networks of Race and Gender Justice. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeangène Vilmer, J. B., Escorcia, A., Guillaume, M., and Herrera, J. (2018). Information Manipulation: A Challenge for Our Democracies. Report by the Policy Planning Staff (CAPS, Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs) and the Institute for Strategic Research (IRSEM, Ministry for the Armed Forces). www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/information_manipulation_rvb_cle838736.pdf.Google Scholar
Jungherr, A. (2016). “Twitter Use in Election Campaigns: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13 (1): 72–91. doi:10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jungherr, A., Rivero, G., and Gayo-Avello, D. (2020). “Retooling Politics.” In Retooling Politics: How Digital Media Are Shaping Democracy. Eds Jungherr, A, Rivero, G, and Gayo-Avello, D. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. i‒ii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, G. and Rizzo, S. (2020). President Trump’s False Claims of Vote Fraud: A Chronology. The Washington Post, November 5. https://tinyurl.com/4357s8pt.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. M., Hsu, J., Neiman, D., Kou, C., Bankston, L., Yun Kim, S., Heinrich, R., Baragwanath, R., and Raskutti, G. (2018). “The Stealth Media? Groups and Targets behind Divisive Issue Campaigns on Facebook.” Political Communication 35 (4): 515–541. doi:10.1080/10584609.2018.1476425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozyreva, A. et al. (2024). Toolbox of Individual-Level Interventions against Online Misinformation. Nature Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01881-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lachapelle, E., Montpetit, É., and Gauvin, J.-P. (2014). “Expert Framing and Political Worldviews.” Policy Studies Journal 42 (4): 674–697. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee Myers, S. and Mozur, P. (2019). China Is Waging a Disinformation War against Hong Kong Protesters. New York Times, September 3. www.nytimes.com/2019/08/13/world/asia/hong-kong-protests-china.html.Google Scholar
Levitsky, S. and Ziblatt, D. (2019). How Democracies Die. Harlow, England: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Li, H. and Sakamoto, Y. (2014) “Social Impacts in Social Media: An Examination of Perceived Truthfulness and Sharing of Information.” Computers in Human Behavior 41: 278–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, R., Mettler, S., Pepinsky, T., Roberts, K., and Valelly, R. (2019). “The Trump Presidency and American Democracy: A Historical and Comparative Analysis.” Perspectives on Politics 17 (2): 470–479. doi:10.1017/S1537592718003286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCarthy, M. (2022). Transparency Recommendations for Regulatory Regimes of Digital Platforms. CIGI Report, March 8. https://tinyurl.com/tzep28ur /.Google Scholar
MacLean, N. (2020). “‛Since We Are Greatly Outnumbered’”: Why and How the Koch Network Uses Disinformation to Thwart Democracy. In The Disinformation Age (SSRC Anxieties of Democracy). Eds Bennett, W. L. and Livingston., S. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 120–150. doi:10.1017/9781108914628.005.Google Scholar
Manin, B. (1997). The Principles of Representative Government (Themes in the Social Sciences). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511659935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margetts, H. (2019). “Rethinking Democracy with Social Media.” The Political Quarterly 90: 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, L. (2018). Uncivil Agreement. How Politics Became Our Identity. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, S. and Tenove, C. (2021). “Disinformation as a Threat to Deliberative Democracy.” Political Research Quarterly 74 (3): 703–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., and Medders, R. B. (2010). “Social and Heuristic Approaches to Credibility Evaluation Online.” Journal of Communication 60 (3): 413–439. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Intelligence Council. (2021). Intelligence Community Assessment: Foreign Threats to the 2020 US Federal Elections. March 10. www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/ICA-declass-16MAR21.pdf.Google Scholar
Neff, T. and Pickard, V. (2021). “Funding Democracy: Public Media and Democratic Health in 33 Countries.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 29 (3). https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211060255.Google Scholar
Norris, Pi. (2014). Why Electoral Integrity Matters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, P. (2019). “Do Perceptions of Electoral Malpractice Undermine Democratic Satisfaction? The US in Comparative Perspective.” International Political Science Review 40 (1): 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512118806783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohlin, J. D. (2021). A Roadmap for Fighting Election Interference. AJIL Unbound. AMA. c115: 69‒73. doi:10.1017/aju.2020.87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osmundsen, M., Bor, A., Vahlstrup, P. B., Bechmann, A., and Petersen, M. (2020). Partisan Polarization Is the Primary Psychological Motivation behind Political Fake News Sharing on Twitter. March 25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panditharatne, M. (2022). Law Requiring Social Media Transparency Would Break New Ground. Brennan Center Report, April 6. https://tinyurl.com/423vw6x2.Google Scholar
Pennycook, G. and Rand, D. G. (2021). Research Note: Examining False Beliefs about Voter Fraud in the Wake of the 2020 Presidential Election. Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, G., Bueno Bojczuk Camargo, I., and Parks, L. (2022). “WhatsApp Disruptions in Brazil: A Content Analysis of User and News Media Responses, 2015–2018.” Global Media and Communication 18 (1): 113–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/17427665211038530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persily, N. (2017). “Can Democracy Survive the Internet?” Journal of Democracy 28 (2), 63‒76. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persily, N. and Tucker, J. (2020). Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field, Prospects for Reform (SSRC Anxieties of Democracy). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center. (2022). Social Media Seen as Mostly Good for Democracy across Many Nations, but US, Is a Major Outlier. December. https://tinyurl.com/273wtwmj.Google Scholar
Poona, S. and Bansal, S. (2019). Misinformation Is Endangering India’s Election. The Atlantic, April 1. https://tinyurl.com/yh4acc2u.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A., Stokes, S., and Manin, B. (Eds.). (1999). Democracy, Accountability, and Representation (Cambridge Studies in the Theory of Democracy). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, D. (2021). “Lawfare in the Disinformation Age: Chinese Interference in Taiwan 2020 Elections.” Harvard International Law Journal 62 (5): 525–567.Google Scholar
Quitzon, J. (2021). Social Media Misinformation and the 2022 Philippine Elections. Center for Strategic and International Studies, November 22. https://tinyurl.com/bde7d7c4 .Google Scholar
Repucci, S. (2019). Media Freedom: A Downward Spiral. Freedom House Report: Freedom and the Media 2019. https://tinyurl.com/2s3hfbws.Google Scholar
Resende, G., Melo, P., Reis, J. et al. (2019). Analyzing Textual (Mis)Information Shared in WhatsApp Groups. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science – WebSci19, Boston, July. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3292522.3326029.Google Scholar
Rochefort, A. (2020). “Regulating Social Media Platforms: A Comparative Policy Analysis.” Communication Law and Policy 25 (2): 225–260. doi:10.1080/10811680.2020.1735194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roozenbeek, J. and van der Linden, S. (2018). “The Fake News Game: Actively Inoculating against the Risk of Misinformation.” Journal of Risk Research 22 (5): 570–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2018.1443491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roose, K. (2018). “We Asked for Examples of Election Misinformation: You Delivered.” New York Times, November 4. www.nytimes.com/2018/11/04/us/politics/election-misinformation-facebook.html.Google Scholar
Rudat, A. and Buder, J. (2015). “Making Retweeting Social: The Influence of Content and Context Information on Sharing News in Twitter.” Computers in Human Behavior 46: 75‒84. 10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seo, H. and Faris, R. (2021). “Comparative Approaches to Mis/Disinformation: Introduction.” International Journal of Communication 15: 1165–1172.Google Scholar
Tenove, C. (2020). “Protecting Democracy from Disinformation: Normative Threats and Policy Responses.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 25 (3): 517–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220918740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theocharis, Y., Roberts, M. Barberá, P., and Tucker, J. (2017). “From Liberation to Turmoil: Social Media and Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 28 (4): 46–59.Google Scholar
Tucker, J. et al. (2018). “Social Media, Political Polarization, and Political Disinformation: A Review of the Scientific Literature.” https://tinyurl.com/52tu62sx. Pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
Toquero, L. (2022). Détente Instituionalized Disinformation, and Paved the Way for a Marcos Victory. rappler.com, June 19. https://tinyurl.com/w8at4cra.Google Scholar
Tworek, H. and Leerssen, P. (2019). An Analysis of Germany’s NetzDG Law. Transatlantic. https://dare.uva.nl/search?identifier=3dc07e3e-a988-4f61-bb8c-388d903504a7.Google Scholar
Vandewalker, I. (2020). Digital Disinformation and Vote Suppression. Brennan Center for Justice Report. https://tinyurl.com/5fekzby3.Google Scholar
Voting Rights Lab. (2022). The State of State Election Law: A Review of 2021–22 and a First Look at 2023. December. https://votingrightslab.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/.Google Scholar
Wall Street Journal. The Facebook Files Archive. (2022). www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-files-xcheck-zuckerberg-elite-rules-11631541353.Google Scholar
Watts, D. J., Rothschild, D. M., and Mobius, M. (2021). “Measuring the News and Its Impact on Democracy.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (15). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912443118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watts, D. J. and Rothschild, D. M. (2017). Don’t Blame the Election on Fake News: Blame It on the Media. Columbia Journalism Review. www.cjr.org/analysis/fake-news-media-election-trump.php.Google Scholar
Wittenberg, C. and Berinsky, A. (2020). “Misinformation and Its Correction.” In Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field, Prospects for Reform. Eds Persily, N. and Tucker, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 163–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolley, S. (2022). In Many Democracies, Disinformation Targets the Most Vulnerable. Center for International Governance Innovation. July 18. https://tinyurl.com/2evd3s83/.Google Scholar
Wu, J., Yorgason, C., Folsz, H., Handan-Nader, C., Myers, A., Nowacki, T., Thompson, D. M., Yoder, J., and Hall, A. B. (2023). Are Dead People Voting by Mail? Evidence from Washington State Administrative Records. Working Paper. https://tinyurl.com/yhtbk8ke.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×