Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of boxes
- Acknowledgements
- 1 INTRODUCTION AND THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL GIS
- 2 FIRST PRINCIPLES
- 3 PUTTING GIS TO WORK IN ARCHAEOLOGY
- 4 THE GEODATABASE
- 5 SPATIAL DATA ACQUISITION
- 6 BUILDING SURFACE MODELS
- 7 EXPLORATORY DATA ANALYSIS
- 8 SPATIAL ANALYSIS
- 9 MAP ALGEBRA, SURFACE DERIVATIVES AND SPATIAL PROCESSES
- 10 REGIONS: TERRITORIES, CATCHMENTS AND VIEWSHEDS
- 11 ROUTES: NETWORKS, COST PATHS AND HYDROLOGY
- 12 MAPS AND DIGITAL CARTOGRAPHY
- 13 MAINTAINING SPATIAL DATA
- Glossary
- References
- Index
3 - PUTTING GIS TO WORK IN ARCHAEOLOGY
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of boxes
- Acknowledgements
- 1 INTRODUCTION AND THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL GIS
- 2 FIRST PRINCIPLES
- 3 PUTTING GIS TO WORK IN ARCHAEOLOGY
- 4 THE GEODATABASE
- 5 SPATIAL DATA ACQUISITION
- 6 BUILDING SURFACE MODELS
- 7 EXPLORATORY DATA ANALYSIS
- 8 SPATIAL ANALYSIS
- 9 MAP ALGEBRA, SURFACE DERIVATIVES AND SPATIAL PROCESSES
- 10 REGIONS: TERRITORIES, CATCHMENTS AND VIEWSHEDS
- 11 ROUTES: NETWORKS, COST PATHS AND HYDROLOGY
- 12 MAPS AND DIGITAL CARTOGRAPHY
- 13 MAINTAINING SPATIAL DATA
- Glossary
- References
- Index
Summary
This chapter reviews four typical applications of GIS in archaeology: management of archaeological resources, excavation, landscape archaeology and the spatial modelling of past human behaviour. For each application we discuss some general issues concerning the use of GIS in that particular context, followed by a presentation of a case study that illustrates the contribution that GIS has made. Although these examples are in no way exhaustive, they do provide a good overview of the capabilities and potential contributions that GIS can make to archaeological management and research.
Management of archaeological resources
It is not our intention to discuss the objectives of cultural resource management (CRM), nor the appropriate structure of a spatial database for managing the archaeological record, as these decisions are most appropriately made by government bodies and the archaeologists charged with the tasks of recording and managing the archaeological resource. However, we note that archaeological and historic databases have increasingly been subject to government scrutiny. In the UK, this most recently occurred in a parliamentary review of archaeology that took place in 2003 (APPAG 2003; Gilman 2004). In particular, the UK archaeological databases termed ‘Sites and Monuments Records’ (SMRs) are under review in light of recent developments in information technology, especially GIS and the Internet (e.g. Newman 2002). This report makes it clear that SMRs should evolve into broader Historic Environment Records (HERs) that include information such as historic buildings, parks and gardens, historic aircraft crash sites, etc.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Geographical Information Systems in Archaeology , pp. 33 - 50Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2006
- 1
- Cited by