Book contents
- Genre in English Medical Writing, 1500–1820
- Studies in English Language
- Genre in English Medical Writing, 1500–1820
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Image Gallery
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Chapter 1 Medical Discourse and Sociocultural Contexts 1500–1820
- Chapter 2 John Arderne’s Afterlife in Manuscript and Print
- Chapter 3 John Mirfield’s Gouernayl of Helþe
- Chapter 4 Surgical Handbooks Translated into Low German
- Chapter 5 Tracing the Early Modern John of Burgundy
- Chapter 6 The Plague in Southern Italy in 1815–1816
- Chapter 7 On Excitability
- Chapter 8 Systems and Centos
- Chapter 9 Medical Vocabulary in English Romantic Literature
- Chapter 10 Foreign Ingredients in Early and Late Modern English Recipes
- Chapter 11 Walter Bailey’s (1529–1593) Medical Genres
- Chapter 12 London Bills of Mortality of the Seventeenth Century
- Chapter 13 Advertising Proprietary Medicines in Pamphlets
- Chapter 14 Persuasion in Hungarian Medical Recipes
- Chapter 15 Persuasion in Early Modern English Medical Recipes
- Chapter 16 Richard III
- Chapter 17 Images and Paratexts
- Preface to the Image Gallery
- Image Gallery
- Index
- References
Chapter 1 - Medical Discourse and Sociocultural Contexts 1500–1820
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 October 2022
Book contents
- Genre in English Medical Writing, 1500–1820
- Studies in English Language
- Genre in English Medical Writing, 1500–1820
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Image Gallery
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Chapter 1 Medical Discourse and Sociocultural Contexts 1500–1820
- Chapter 2 John Arderne’s Afterlife in Manuscript and Print
- Chapter 3 John Mirfield’s Gouernayl of Helþe
- Chapter 4 Surgical Handbooks Translated into Low German
- Chapter 5 Tracing the Early Modern John of Burgundy
- Chapter 6 The Plague in Southern Italy in 1815–1816
- Chapter 7 On Excitability
- Chapter 8 Systems and Centos
- Chapter 9 Medical Vocabulary in English Romantic Literature
- Chapter 10 Foreign Ingredients in Early and Late Modern English Recipes
- Chapter 11 Walter Bailey’s (1529–1593) Medical Genres
- Chapter 12 London Bills of Mortality of the Seventeenth Century
- Chapter 13 Advertising Proprietary Medicines in Pamphlets
- Chapter 14 Persuasion in Hungarian Medical Recipes
- Chapter 15 Persuasion in Early Modern English Medical Recipes
- Chapter 16 Richard III
- Chapter 17 Images and Paratexts
- Preface to the Image Gallery
- Image Gallery
- Index
- References
Summary
This introductory chapter discusses the contents of the volume with its focus on genres and text traditions of medical discourse in a diachronic perspective. Variability of medical language with its conventions and traditions of writing is a leading theme in several chapters and surfaces in others as well. The social and cultural contexts of production and use as well as meaning-making processes of written texts as communicative events receive attention. All contributions take context in textual production and use into account. Another point of emphasis is variation in discourse forms in texts that were removed from the original settings and repurposed for new readerships. Texts circulating in Britain are at centre stage, but medical discourses reflecting common ideological assumptions had a broad currency and English writers shared profoundly in the pan-European medical culture.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Genre in English Medical Writing, 1500–1820Sociocultural Contexts of Production and Use, pp. 1 - 12Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Alonso-Almeida, Francisco. 2013. Genre conventions in English recipes, 1600–1800. In DiMeo, Michelle & Pennell, Sara (eds.), Reading and writing recipe books, 1550–1800, 68–90. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Dwight. 1992. The evolution of medical research writing from 1735 to 1985: The case of the Edinburgh Medical Journal. Applied Linguistics 13: 337–74.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Dwight. 1999. Scientific discourse in sociohistorical context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, & Conrad, Susan. 2009. Register, genre and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, & Finegan, Edward. 1989. Drift and the evolution of English style: A history of three genres. Language 65(3): 487–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claridge, Claudia. 2017 [2012]. Styles, registers, genres and text types. In Bergs, Alex & Brinton, Laurel (eds.), Historical outlines from sound to text: Reprint articles from English historical linguistics: An international handbook, 218–37. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Crossgrove, William. 1998. Introduction. In Crossgrove, William, Schleissner, Margaret, & Voigts, Linda Ehrsam (eds.), Early Science and Medicine 3(2): 81–7. Special issue.Google Scholar
Dorgeloh, Heidrun. 2016. The interrelationship of register and genre in medical discourse. In Schubert, Christoph & Sanchez-Stockhammer, Christina (eds.), Variational text linguistics: Revisiting register in English, 43–65. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrelly, Michael, & Seoane, Elena. 2012. Democratization. In Nevalainen, Terttu & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 392–401. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulk, Robert D. 2016. Philological methods. In Kytö, Merja & Pahta, Päivi (eds.), English historical linguistics, 95–107. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Görlach, Manfred. 2008. Text types and the history of English. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Gross, Alan G., Harmon, Joseph E., & Reidy, Michael. 2002. Communicating science: The scientific article from the 17th century to the present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo, & Loureiro-Porto, Lucía. 2020. Democratization of Englishes: Synchronic and diachronic approaches. Language Sciences 79: 101275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo, & Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.). In pressa. Corpus pragmatic studies on the history of medical discourse. Pragmatics and Beyond New Series, vol. 330. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo, & Taavitsainen, Irma. In pressb. Corpora, pragmatics, and historical medical discourse. In Hiltunen, Turo & Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Corpus Pragmatic Studies on the History of Medical Discourse, 1–19. Pragmatics and Beyond New Series, vol. 330. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 2008. Historical pragmatics. Language and Linguistic Compass 2(5): 894–906.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N., & Short, Mick. 1981. Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. Milton: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lehto, Anu, & Taavitsainen, Irma. 2019. Medical case reports in Late Modern English. In Taavitsainen, Irma & Hiltunen, Turo (eds.), Late Modern English medical texts: Writing medicine in the eighteenth century, 89–111. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., & Jucker, Andreas H.. 2021. The pragmatics of fiction: Literature, stage and screen discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Pahta, Päivi, & Jucker, Andreas H.. 2011. Communicating Early English manuscripts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pahta, Päivi, & Taavitsainen, Irma. 2010. Scientific discourse. In Jucker, Andreas H. & Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Historical pragmatics, 549–86. Vol. VIII of Wolfram Bubliz, Andreas H. Jucker, & Klaus P. Schneider (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics, vols. I–X. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Peikola, Matti, Mäkilahde, Aleksi, Salmi, Hanna, Varila, Mari-Liisa, & Skaffari, Janne (eds.). 2017. Verbal and visual communication in Early English texts. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Salager-Meyer, Francoise, Alcaraz Ariza, María Ángeles, & Pabón Berbesí, Maryelis. 2007. Collegiality, critique and the construction of scientific argumentation in medical book reviews: A diachronic approach. Journal of Pragmatics 39, 1758–74.Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas (ed.). 1960. Style in language. New York: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Siraisi, Nancy G. 1990. Medieval and early Renaissance medicine: An introduction to knowledge and practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jeremy. 2020. Transforming Early English: The reinvention of Early English and Older Scots. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swales, John M. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swales, John M. 2004. Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2001. Changing conventions of writing: The dynamics of genres, text types, and text traditions. European Journal of English Studies 5(2): 139–50.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2011. Medical case reports and scientific thought-styles. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos 17, Special issue, Almeida, Francisco Alonso (ed.), 75–98.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2015. Historical pragmatics. In Biber, Douglas & Reppen, Randy (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics, 252–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2016. Genre dynamics in the history of English. In Kytö, Merja & Pahta, Päivi (eds.), English historical linguistics, 271–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Voigts, Linda E. 1989. Scientific and medical books. In Griffiths, Jeremy & Pearsall, Derek (eds.), Book production and publishing in Britain 1375–1475, 345–402. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Włodarczyk, Matylda, & Taavitsainen, Irma. 2017. Historical (socio)pragmatics at present. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18(2): 159–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar