Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:17:08.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

22 - “Freakin’ Hard”

Game Design and Issue Literacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

Constance Steinkuehler
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Kurt Squire
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Sasha Barab
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Get access

Summary

We had ambitious goals for the Boys & Girls Clubs of America’s GameTech Program. We set out to use the lens of game design to expose nine- to thirteen-year-old youth to systems thinking, basic programming skills, the iterative design process, game-design concepts, and understanding the dynamics of real-world issues, something we call issue literacy. This was an incredible laundry list of pedagogical goals, each alone presenting its own complexities and together posing a rather daunting curriculum design challenge. The issues we encountered were numerous but can be boiled down to five core challenges: teaching the software tools to the point where they were not the locus of attention, instilling a deep understanding of games and systems thinking, the complexity of finding form-appropriate means of addressing issues in games, creating issue literacy, and the difficulties in assisting teachers and facilitators in teaching all the above.

This chapter is a travelogue of our work in this space, the challenges we faced along the way, and our encounters with other programs and projects pursuing similar goals. In the pages that follow we will explore the challenges in combining active learning through game design with differing forms of issue literacy and civic engagement. While the connections among game play, learning, and civic engagement have been explored and studied widely (Lenhart et al., 2008), using game design, not game play, as an entry point to learning about social and civic concerns is a much less explored pedagogical space. We will look at the difficulties presented by this curricular approach, our investigation of programs with similar pedagogical objectives, and how we refactored our approach in Activate!, a more recent online curriculum we developed for thirteen- to fifteen-year-olds. Framing our discussion is the question: Is learning to make games a natural next step in game-based learning programs, or is it a complete departure from programs based on play?

Type
Chapter
Information
Games, Learning, and Society
Learning and Meaning in the Digital Age
, pp. 381 - 402
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bachhuber, J.Flanagan, Joseph, B. M.Macklin, C.Sharp, J. 2009 Issue literacy: Teaching games for changeNew YorkGoogle Scholar
Charness, N.Krampe, R. T.Mayr, U. 1996 Ericsson, K. A.The Road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and gameMahwah, NJErlbaumGoogle Scholar
Costikyan, G. 2002 Mäyrä, F.Proceedings of Computer Games and Digital Cultures ConferenceTampere, FinlandTampere University PressGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A.Krampe, R. T.Tesch-Römer, C. 1993 The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance.”Psychological Review 100 363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrester, J. W. 1958 Industrial Dynamics – A Major Breakthrough for Decision MakersHarvard Business Review 36 37Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. 2003 What video games have to teach us about learning and literacyNew YorkPalgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Gladwell, M. 2008 OutliersNew YorkLittle, BrownGoogle Scholar
Lantz, F. 2009 http://gamedesignadvance.com/?p=1567
Lenhart, A.Kahne, J.Middaugh, E.Macgill, A.Evans, C.Vitak, J. 2008 http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2008/Teens-Video-Games-and-Civics.aspx
McCloud, S. 1993 Understanding comics: The invisible artNorthampton, MAKitchen Sink PressGoogle Scholar
Nudell, H.Brunner, C.Pasnik, S. 2007 Playing 4 keeps evaluation reportEDCCenter for Children and TechnologyGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×