Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T06:30:39.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Prominent classes of strategic form games

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

Aviad Heifetz
Affiliation:
Open University of Israel
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In the previous chapters we defined the basic solution concepts for strategic form games – from those relying on considerations of dominance to the notion of Nash equilibrium which hinges on a concept of stability. It is now time to explore important classes of strategic form games and to analyze their properties.

Chapter 7 addresses a twofold classification: games of cooperation vs. games of conflict, and games with strategic complements vs. games with strategic substitutes. The first distinction asks whether each player would have preferred her rivals to increase the intensity of their action (games of cooperation) or decrease it (games of conflict). The second distinction asks whether, upon an increase in the intensity of the rivals’ action, the player herself would have preferred to increase the intensity of her own action (strategic complements) or decrease it (strategic substitutes); or, in other words, whether the reaction function of the player is increasing (the case of strategic substitutes) or decreasing (strategic complements).

Somewhat surprisingly, these two dimensions of classification are independent of one another, and each of the four combinations of cooperation/conflict and strategic complements/substitutes is possible. The partnership game, presented already in Chapter 6, is an example of a game of cooperation with strategic complements. The first example in that chapter, that of a public good game, is of cooperation with strategic substitutes. This game is analyzed in detail, showing, first, that its Nash equilibrium is inefficient – i.e. that all players would have preferred to play a profile of strategies in which they all invest more than at the Nash equilibrium. Unfortunately, such a unanimously preferable investment profile is not a Nash equilibrium and hence does not constitute a stable, self-sustaining agreement. Furthermore, we show that the larger the group of players, the more inefficient the Nash equilibrium becomes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Game Theory
Interactive Strategies in Economics and Management
, pp. 85 - 88
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×