Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:01:43.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - The principle of equal treatment and gender: theory and practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Jude Browne
Affiliation:
Nuffield Fellow, University of Cambridge
Jude Browne
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

There is a troubling theoretical–empirical divide in contemporary approaches to equality and justice. All too often guiding principles prescribed by normative social and political theorists are divorced from the workable mechanisms available to political reformers. In turn, reformers are themselves all too often unclear as to what precisely should be held up as guiding objectives if they are to accomplish their purpose. The result is unsurprisingly often disappointing. Social equality between men and women, more commonly termed ‘gender equality’, is one such case and will be the general theme of this chapter.

Central to any account of equality is the principle of equal treatment, and it is this principle's translation into practice that I wish to consider specifically. The principle of equal treatment is a constitutive feature of justice and a minimum political standard throughout mainstream western political culture (Habermas 1983; Kymlicka 1990; Nagel 1991). It is understood as prescribing treatment of individuals as equals, i.e. with equal concern and respect (Dworkin 1977: 370) and not the often unacceptable notion that all individuals are indistinguishable and thus should be treated uniformly. To treat people equally, in this latter sense, might of course be appropriate according to the principle of equal treatment but is not necessarily so. This subtlety allows us to create institutions and structures which can administer the equal treatment of individuals who are alike in ‘relevant and specified respects’ in a way that is constructive and just.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Future of Gender , pp. 250 - 279
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becker, G. (1981, 1991) A Treatise on the Family (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Becker, G. (1985) ‘Human Capital, Effort and the Sexual Division of Labour’, Journal of Labour Economics 3: 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, C. (1983) Fathers, Childbirth and Work (Manchester: Equal Opportunities Commission).Google Scholar
Brewer, M., Goodman, A., Shaw, J. and Shephard, A. (2005) Poverty and Inequality in Britain 2005. Commentary No. 99. FIS. London.
Browne, J. (2004) ‘Resolving Gender Pay Inequality? Rationales, Enforcement and Policy’, Journal of Social Policy 33, 4: 553–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, J. (2006) Gender Inequality and Sex Segregation in the Modern Labour Market (Bristol: Policy Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, A. (1997) Fatherhood Reclaimed: The Making of the Modern Father (London: Vermillion).Google Scholar
Burgess, A. and Ruxton, S. (1996) Men and Their Children: Proposals for Public Policy (London: Institute for Public Policy Research).Google Scholar
Colman, A. and Colman, L. (1988) The Father: Mythology and Changing Roles (Wilmette, IL: Chiron).Google Scholar
Deakin, S. and Morris, G. (1998) Labour Law (London: Butterworths).Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1977) Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
EOC (2003) Annual Report (Manchester: EOC).Google Scholar
EOC (2005a) Facts about Men and Women in Great Britain (Manchester: EOC).Google Scholar
EOC (2005b) Time to Deliver (Manchester: EOC).Google Scholar
Equal Opportunities Review 117 (May 2003).
Equal Opportunities Review 106 (June 2002).
Ewing, K. (ed.) (1996) Working Life: A New Perspective on Labour Law (London: Lawrence and Wishart).Google Scholar
Fredman, S. (1997) Women and the Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Gregg, P. and Washbrook, E. (2003) The Effects of Early Maternal Employment on Understanding the Impact of Poverty on Children of the 90's. CMPO Working Paper Series 03/070.
Haas, L. and Hwang, C. P. (2005) The Impact of Taking Parental Leave on Fathers' Participation in Childcare and Ties with Children: Lessons from Sweden Conference Paper. First International Conference – Community, Work and Family, 16–18 March 2005, Manchester, UK. See www.did.stu.mmu.ac.uk/cwf/Haas_HwangManchester.doc.
Habermas, J. (1983) ‘Discourse Ethics: Notes on a Program of Philosophical Justification,’ in J. Habermas, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, trans. C. Lenhardt and S. Weber Nicholsen, 1990 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 43–115.Google Scholar
Hatter, W., Vinter, L. and Williams, R. (2002) Dads on Dads: Needs and Expectations at Home and at Work (Manchester: EOC).Google Scholar
Hepple, B. (1984) Equal Pay and the Industrial Tribunals (London: Sweet and Maxwell).Google Scholar
Hepple, B. (1995) ‘Social Values and European Law’, Current Legal Problems 48, 2: 39–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepple, B. (2002) ‘Enforcement: The Law and Politics of Cooperation and Compliance’, in Hepple, B. (ed.), Social and Labour Rights in a Global Context: International and Comparative Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 238–57.Google Scholar
Hewlett, B. (1991) Intimate Fathers: The Nature and Content of Aka Pygmy Paternal Infant Care (Michigan: University of Michigan Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, B. and Morgan, D. (2002) ‘Introduction: Making Men into Fathers’ in Hobson, B. (ed.), Making Men into Fathers: Men, Masculinities and the Social Politics of Fatherhood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IRS Employment Review (2004a) Issue 804, July 2004. IRS. See http://www.irser.co.uk/
IRS Employment Review (2004b) Issue 798, April 2004 IRS. See http://www.irser.co.uk/
Jarman, J. (1992) Which Way Forward? Conceptual Issues from the Current Proposals To Amend the British Equal Pay Act. Sociological Research Group Working Papers 8. University of Cambridge.
Kymlicka, W. (1990) Contemporary Political Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Labour Party (2005) Labour Party Manifesto (London: Labour Party).Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. (1927) The Father in Primitive Psychology (London: Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Mead, M. (1935) Sex and Temperament in Three Primitive Societies (New York: Morrow).Google Scholar
Meehan, E. (1985) Rights at Work: Campaigns and Policy in Britain and the United States (Basingstoke: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, T. (1991) Equality and Partiality (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Neathey, F., Dench, S., and Thomson, L. March (2003) Monitoring Progress towards Pay Equality: EOC Research Discussion Series. EOC. Manchester.
O'Brien, M. and Shemilt, I. (2003), Working Fathers: Earning and Caring, Research and Discussion Series (Manchester: Equal Opportunities Commission).Google Scholar
ONS (2005a) The Demographic Characteristics of the Oldest Old in the United Kingdom. Population Trends 120. Summer 2005 (London: ONS).Google Scholar
ONS (2005b) ‘Labour Market, More Lone Parents Working’ at www.statistics.gov.uk as of 21 November 2005.
Pittmann, F. (1993) Man Enough: Fathers, Sons, and the Search for Masculinity (New York: Berkeley Publishing Co.).Google Scholar
Posner, R. (1992) Economic Analysis of Law, 4th ed (London: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, M. (1984) Equal Pay for Work of Equal Value (London: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubenstein, M. (2004) ‘Equal Value Procedures To Be Improved’. Equal Opportunities Review 121, July 2004 (London: LexisNexis Butterworths).Google Scholar
Rubenstein, M. (2005) ‘Amending the Sex Discrimination Act’. Equal Opportunities Review, 140, April 2005 (London: LexisNexis Butterworths).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×