Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Reorienting the feminist imagination
- Part II Variations on the theme of gender
- Part III Gender and political practice
- 9 The politics of female diversity in the twenty-first century
- 10 Gender inequality and the gendered division of labour
- 11 The principle of equal treatment and gender: theory and practice
- Index
- References
9 - The politics of female diversity in the twenty-first century
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Reorienting the feminist imagination
- Part II Variations on the theme of gender
- Part III Gender and political practice
- 9 The politics of female diversity in the twenty-first century
- 10 Gender inequality and the gendered division of labour
- 11 The principle of equal treatment and gender: theory and practice
- Index
- References
Summary
There is still no consensus on what the goals of feminism should be. This is largely because women themselves differ in their life-goals, needs and aspirations. Until recently, there has been rather more consensus on the key indicators of women's position in society, and the pace of change – which is glacial. However there is again little agreement on explanations for the slow pace of change, and what should be done about it. This chapter presents a new theory for explaining the lack of any fundamental change after the equal opportunities revolution of the late twentieth century; preference theory also shows that some women are benefiting greatly from recent changes while others are not, and predicts a continuing polarisation of the female workforce. Perhaps most important, preference theory predicts that sex and gender are ceasing to be key dividing factors in the workforce and in society; instead, it is lifestyle preferences, personally chosen values and life-goals that segment society and determine patterns of work and employment over the lifecycle.
New feminist myths
The pay gap (the difference in average hourly earnings between men and women) has long been used as a simple but telling indicator of sex discrimination in the labour market and, by implication, other areas of life. It is published annually in Britain, and is scrutinised closely every year by gender specialists. Is it up? Or down? Until recently, this was appropriate.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Future of Gender , pp. 191 - 227Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007
References
, and (2003) ‘Is There a Glass Ceiling in Sweden?’, Journal of Labor Economics 21: 145–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2005) ‘Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: a meta-analytic review’, Review of General Psychology 8: 291–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2003) Women Don't Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Bertram, H., Rosler, W. and Ehlert, N. (2005) Nachhaltige Familienpolitik (Berlin: Bundesministerium fur Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend).
, , and (eds.) (2006) Work–Life Integration: International Perspectives on the Balancing of Multiple Roles (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘Evolved Sex Differences and Occupational Segregation’, Journal of Organizational Behaviour 27: 143–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1976) ‘Some Personality Differences between Members of One-Career and Two-Career Families’, Journal of Marriage and the Family 38: 453–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004) Occupational Ghettos: The Worldwide Segregation of Women and Men (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
(1978) The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Cleland, J. (1985) ‘Marital Fertility Decline in Developing Countries: Theories and the Evidence’, in and (eds.), Reproductive Change in Developing Countries: Insights from the World Fertility Survey (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 223–52.Google Scholar
Corijn, M. and Hakim, C. (forthcoming) ‘Lifestyle Preferences in Belgium-Flanders’.
and (2005) ‘The New Gender Essentialism – Domestic and Family Choices and Their Relation to Attitudes’, British Journal of Sociology, 56: 601–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1982) ‘Achievement Variables and Class Cultures: Family, Schooling, Job and Forty-Nine Dependent Variables in the Cumulative GSS’, American Sociological Review 47: 569–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1998) ‘Soft Skills and Long Run Labor Market Success’, Research in Labor Economics 17: 123–49.Google Scholar
(1995) ‘The Science and Politics of Comparing Women and Men’, American Psychologist 50: 145–58 (with comments by Hyde and Plant, Marecek, and Buss, and response by Eagly, 159–71).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (eds.) (2006) ‘Symposium on Careers and Family-Friendly Policies’, British Journal of Guidance and Counselling 34: 273–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985) Hard Choices: How Women Decide about Work, Career and Motherhood (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press).Google Scholar
(2004) ‘Feminism-by-Design: Emerging Capitalisms, Cultural Feminism, and Women's Nongovernmental Organisations in Postsocialist Eastern Europe’, Signs 29: 727–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) ‘Blessing or Curse? Work–Family Policies and Mothers’ Wage Growth over Time', Work and Occupations 31: 367–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulding, C. and Reed, K. (2006) ‘Commitment, Community and Happiness: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding Lifestyle and Work’, in et al. (eds.), Work–Life Integration: International Perspectives on the Balancing of Multiple Roles (New York: Palgrave Macmillan), 216–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (1999) Women, Work and Inequality: The Challenge of Equal Pay in a Deregulated Labour Market (London: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995) ‘Five Feminist Myths about Women's Employment’, British Journal of Sociology 46: 429–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1996) ‘Labour Mobility and Employment Stability: Rhetoric and Reality on the Sex Differential in Labour Market Behaviour’, European Sociological Review 12: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Social Change and Innovation in the Labour Market (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
(2000a) Work–Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
(2003a) Models of the Family in Modern Societies: Ideals and Realities (Aldershot: Ashgate).Google Scholar
(2003b) ‘Public Morality versus Personal Choice: The Failure of Social Attitude Surveys’, British Journal of Sociology 54: 339–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003c) ‘A New Approach to Explaining Fertility Patterns: Preference Theory’, Population and Development Review 29: 349–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003d) Childlessness in Europe, Report to the Economic and Social Research Council (London: London School of Economics).Google Scholar
(2004a) Key Issues in Women's Work: Female Diversity and the Polarisation of Women's Employment (London: GlassHouse Press).Google Scholar
Hakim, C. (2004b) ‘Lifestyle Preferences and Patriarchal Values: Causal and Non-causal Attitudes’, in Giele and Elke Holst (eds.), Changing Life Patterns in Western Industrial Societies (New York: Elsevier), 69–91.Google Scholar
Hakim, C. (2005) ‘Sex Differences in Work–Life Balance Goals’, in (ed.), Work–Life Balance in the Twenty-First Century (London: Palgrave Macmillan), 55–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2006) ‘Women, Careers, and Work–Life Preferences’, British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, special issue ed. Amal Al-Sawad and Laurie Cohen, 34: 281–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2007) ‘Dancing with the Devil? Essentialism and Other Feminist Heresies’, British Journal of Sociology 58: 123–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1999) The Family Gap in Pay: Evidence from Seven Industrialised Countries (London: London School of Economics, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion).Google Scholar
Henrekson, M. and Dreber, A. (2004) ‘Female Career Choice and Career Success: Institutions, Path Dependence and Psychological Feed-back Effects’, Stockholm School of Economics, Department of Economics.
(1990) The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home (London: Piatkus).Google Scholar
Huang Qinghai, El-Khouri, B. M., Johansson, G., Lindroth, S. and Sverke, M. (2006) ‘Women's Career Patterns: A Study of Swedish Women Born in the 1950s’, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology.
(2002) ‘The Transition in East Germany: When Is a Ten-point Fall in the Gender Wage Gap Bad News?’, Journal of Labor Economics 20: 148–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2004) The Time Divide: Work, Family and Gender Inequality (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
and (2005) ‘The Adult Worker Model Family, Gender Equality and Care: The Search for New Policy Principles and the Possibilities and Problems of a Capabilities Approach’, Economy and Society 34: 76–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Complex Inequality: Gender, Class and Race in the New Economy (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
(2003) ‘Constraints and Choices in Mothers’ Employment Careers: A Consideration of Hakim's Preference Theory', British Journal of Sociology 54: 317–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
and (1998) Gender Equality and Occupational Segregation in Nordic Labour Markets (Geneva: International Labour Office).Google Scholar
Middleton, C. (1988) ‘The Familiar Fate of the Famulae: Gender Divisions in the History of Wage Labour’, in (ed.), On Work (Oxford: Blackwell), 21–47.Google Scholar
(1993) ‘The Contraceptive Pill and Women's Employment as Factors in Fertility Change in Britain 1963–1980: A Challenge to the Conventional View’, Population Studies 47: 221–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(2004) ‘Defending Equality of Outcome’, Journal of Political Philosophy 12: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Working in a 24/7 Economy: Challenges for American Families (New York: Russell Sage Foundation).Google Scholar
Reed, K. and Blunsden, B. (2006) ‘Should Mothers Work? An International Comparison of the Effect of Religion on Women's Work and Family Roles’, in et al. (eds.), Work–Life Integration: International Perspectives on the Balancing of Multiple Roles (New York: Palgrave Macmillan), 135–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1950) ‘Ecological Correlations and the Behaviour of Individuals’, American Sociological Review 15: 351–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (1990) ‘A Cross-national Comparison of the Gender Gap in Income’, American Journal of Sociology 96: 69–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and (2002) ‘Teenage Aspirations for Future Careers and Occupational Outcomes’, Journal of Vocational Behaviour 60: 262–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and (2004) ‘Men Matter More: The Social Class Identity of Married British Women, 1985–1991’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 167: 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1994) ‘Perceived versus Meta-analytic Effect Sizes: An Assessment of the Accuracy of Gender Stereotypes’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66: 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szekelyi, M. and Tardos, R. (1993) Attitudes That Make a Difference: Expectancies and Economic Progress, Discussion papers of the Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin.
(2006) ‘Family-Friendly Labour Market Policies and Careers in Sweden – and the Lack of Them’, British Journal of Guidance and Counselling 34: 309–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(ed.) (1997) Women, Men, and Gender: Ongoing Debates (New Haven and London: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
, and (1995) ‘The Gender Gap in Workplace Authority: A Cross-national Study’, American Sociological Review 60: 407–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3
- Cited by