Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:01:20.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Gender and social change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Tony Lawson
Affiliation:
Reader in Economics, University of Campridge
Jude Browne
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

How in the context of the currently developing global order (and consequent ever-changing local political frameworks) might feminists most sensibly seek to transform the gendered features of society in such a manner as to facilitate a less discriminating scenario than is currently in evidence? This is a question that motivates much of the thinking behind this book. But posing it carries certain presuppositions. In particular it takes for granted the notion that gender is a meaningful as well as useful category of analysis. And it presumes, too, that, whatever the socio-political context, it is always feasible to identify some forms of emancipatory practice, at least with respect to gender discrimination. Or at least there is an assumption that such emancipatory practice is not ruled out in principle. Both sets of presuppositions have been found to be problematic. Specifically, various feminist theorists hold that there are conceptual and political difficulties to making use of the category of gender in social theorising (see e.g. Bordo 1993; Spelman 1990). And the reasoning behind such assessments tends in its turn to be destabilising of the goal of emancipatory practice.

In this chapter I focus on these latter concerns rather than the more specific question posed at the outset. For unless the noted difficulties can somehow be resolved any further questioning of appropriate local and global strategies appears to beg too many issues.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Future of Gender , pp. 136 - 162
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bordo, S. (1993) ‘Feminism, Post Modernism and Gender Scepticism’, in Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body, The Regents of the University of California; reprinted in Anne, C. Herrmann and Stewart, Abigail (eds.), Theorizing Feminism: Parallel Trends in the Humanities and Social Sciences (Boulder, San Francisco and Oxford: Westview Press, 1994) (page references to the latter).Google Scholar
Chodorow, N. (1978) The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Collins, P. (1991) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Ferber, M. and Nelson, J. (eds.) (1993) Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, N. (2000) ‘Rethinking Recognition’, New Left Review 3, May–June: 1–10.Google Scholar
Fricker, M. (2000) ‘Feminism in Epistemology: Pluralism without Post Modernism’, in Fricker, M. and Hornsby, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 146–65.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (1985) ‘A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s’, Socialist Review 80: 65–108.Google Scholar
Haraway, D(1988) ‘Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective’, Feminist Studies 14, 3: 575–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, S. (1993) ‘Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What Is “Strong Objectivity”?’, in Alcoff, L. and Potter, E. (eds.), Feminist Epistemologies (New York: Routledge) 49–82; reprinted in E. Fox Keller and H. Longino (eds.), Feminism and Science (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press), 235–48 (page references to the latter).Google Scholar
Harding, S(1995) ‘Can Feminist Thought Make Economics More Objective?’, Feminist Economics 1, 1: 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartsock, N. (1983) ‘The Feminist Standpoint’, in Harding, S. and Hintikka, M. (eds.), Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science (Dordrecht: Reidel), 283–310; reprinted in (for example) L. Nicholson (ed.), The Second Wave: A Reader in Feminist Theory (London and New York: Routledge), 216–40 (page references to the latter version).Google Scholar
Haslanger, S. (2000) ‘Feminism in Metaphysics, Negotiating the Natural’, in Fricker, M. and Hornsby, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 107–26.Google Scholar
Keller, E. (1985) Reflections on Gender and Science (New Haven: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Kuiper, Edith and Sap, Jolande (eds.) (1995) Out of the Margin: Feminist Perspectives on Economics (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Lawson, T. (1997) Economics and Reality (London and New York: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, T(2003) Reorienting Economics (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
Longino, H. (1990) Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Enquiry (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1952 [1848]) Manifesto of the Communist Party (Moscow: Progress Publishers).Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. (2003) Siblings: Sex and Violence (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
Mohanty, , Talpade, Chandra (2000) ‘Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses’, in Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity (Durham, NC: Duke University Press), 333–58.Google Scholar
Moya, P. (2000) ‘Postmodernism, “Realism”, and the Politics of Identity: Cherríe Moraga and Chicana Feminism’, in Moya, P. and Hames-Garcia, M. (eds.), Reclaiming Identity: Realist Theory and the Predicament of Postmodernism (Berkeley: University of California Press), 67–101.Google Scholar
Oakley, A. (1972) Sex, Gender and Society (London: Temple-Smith).Google Scholar
Phillips, A. (1992) ‘Universal Pretensions in Political Thought’, in Barrett, M. and Phillips, A. (eds.), Destabilizing Theory: Contemporary Feminist Debates (Cambridge: Polity Press), 10–30.Google Scholar
Seiz, J. (1995) ‘Epistemology and the Tasks of Feminist Economics’, Feminist Economics, 1, 3: 110–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Dorothy (1987) The Everyday World as Problematic (Boston: Northeastern University Press).Google Scholar
Smith, Dorothy(1990) The Conceptual Practices of Power (Boston: Northeastern University Press).Google Scholar
Soper, Kate (1990) Troubled Pleasures: Writings on Politics, Gender and Hedonism (London and New York: Verso).Google Scholar
Soper, Kate(1991) ‘Postmodernism, Critical Theory and Critical Realism’, in Bhaskar, Roy (ed.), A Meeting of Minds (London: The Socialist Society), 42–9.Google Scholar
Spelman, Elizabeth V. (1990) Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought (London: The Women's Press).Google Scholar
Stoller, Robert (1968) Sex and Gender (London: Hogarth Press).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Gender and social change
    • By Tony Lawson, Reader in Economics, University of Campridge
  • Edited by Jude Browne, University of Cambridge
  • Book: The Future of Gender
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619205.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Gender and social change
    • By Tony Lawson, Reader in Economics, University of Campridge
  • Edited by Jude Browne, University of Cambridge
  • Book: The Future of Gender
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619205.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Gender and social change
    • By Tony Lawson, Reader in Economics, University of Campridge
  • Edited by Jude Browne, University of Cambridge
  • Book: The Future of Gender
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619205.008
Available formats
×