Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T12:40:39.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2021

David Bilchitz
David Bilchitz
Affiliation:
University of Johannesburg
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Fundamental Rights and the Legal Obligations of Business , pp. 458 - 486
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography

Addo, M. 1999. ‘The Corporation as a Victim of Human Rights Violations’. In Addo, M. (ed.).Google Scholar
Addo, M. (ed.). 1999. Human Rights Standards and the Responsibility of Transnational Corporations. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Alexy, R. 2002. A Theory of Constitutional Rights (trans. J. Rivers). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alexy, R. 2009. ‘On Constitutional Rights to Protection’. Legisprudence 3: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, P. 2005. ‘The “Not-a-Cat” Syndrome: Can the International Human Rights Regime Accommodate Non-state Actors?’. In Alston, P. (ed.).Google Scholar
Alston, P. (ed.). 2005. Non-state Actors and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alvarez, J. E. 2011. ‘Are Corporations Subjects of International Law?’. Santa Clara Journal of International Law 9: 1–35.Google Scholar
Amao, O. 2011. Corporate Social Responsibility, Human Rights and the Law: Multinational Corporations in Developing Countries. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Law Institute. 1994. Principles of Corporate Governance: Analysis and Recommendations. Washington: American Law Institute.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Nicomachean Ethics (trans. W. D. Ross) available at http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.1.i.html.Google Scholar
Ariza, L. J. 2013. ‘The Economic and Social Rights of Prisoners and Constitutional Court Intervention in the Penitentiary System in Colombia’. In Bonilla, D. (ed.).Google Scholar
Armour, J. 2019. ‘Derivative Actions: A Framework for Decisions’. Law Quarterly Review 135: 412–435.Google Scholar
Armour, J., Deakin, S. and Konzelmann, S. 2003. ‘Shareholder Primacy and the Trajectory of UK Corporate Governance’. British Journal of Industrial Relations 41: 531–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armour, J., Black, B., Cheffins, B. and Nolan, R. 2009. ‘Private Enforcement of Corporate Law: An Empirical Comparison of the United Kingdom and the United States’. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 6: 687–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armour, J., Hansmann, H., Kraakman, R. and Pargendler, M. 2017a. ‘What Is Corporate Law?’. In Kraakman, R. et al. (eds.).Google Scholar
Armour, J., Hansmann, H. and Kraakman, R. 2017b. ‘Agency Problems and Legal Strategies’. In Kraakman, R. et al. (eds.).Google Scholar
Armour, J., Enriques, L., Hansmann, H. and Kraakman, R. 2017c. ‘The Basic Governance Structure: The Interests of Shareholders as a Class’. In Kraakman, R. et al. (eds.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armour, J., Gordon, J. and Min, G. 2020a. ‘Taking Compliance Seriously’. Yale Journal of Regulation 37: 1–66.Google Scholar
Armour, J., Garrett, B., Gordon, J. and Min, G. 2020b. ‘Board Compliance’. Minnesota Law Review 104: 1191–1273.Google Scholar
Arnold, D. 2006. ‘Corporate Moral Agency’. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 30: 279–291.Google Scholar
Arnold, D. 2009. ‘The Human Rights Obligations of Multinational Corporations’. In Smith, J. D. (ed.).Google Scholar
Arnold, D. 2010. ‘Transnational Corporations and the Duty to Respect Basic Human Rights’. Business Ethics Quarterly 20: 371–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashcraft, R. 1994. ‘Locke’s Political Philosophy’. In Chappell, V. (ed.).Google Scholar
Ashton, A. 2009. ‘Rescuing the Hero: The Ramifications of Expanding the Duty to Rescue on Society and the Law’. Duke Law Journal 59: 69–107.Google Scholar
Ayers, I. and Braithwaite, J. 1992. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Backer, L. C. 2017. ‘The Human Rights Obligations of State-Owned Enterprises: Emerging Conceptual Structures and Principles in National and International Law and Policy’. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 50: 827–888.Google Scholar
Bakan, J. 2004. The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R., Cave, M. and Lodge, M. 2011. Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Balkin, J. M. and Siegel, R. B. (eds.). 2009. The Constitution in 2020. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barak, A. 2001. ‘Constitutional Human Rights and Private Law’. In Friedmann, D. and Barak-Erez, D. (eds.).Google Scholar
Barak, A. 2012. Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barczak, T. 2017. ‘Konstitutionalisierung der Privatrechtsordnung’. In Scheffczyk, F. and Fabian-Wolter, Y. (eds.).Google Scholar
Barnes, M. 2018. State-Owned Entities in International Law. Geneva: Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies.Google Scholar
Baskin, J. B. and Miranti, P. J. 1997. A History of Corporate Finance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beale, S. 2009. ‘A Response to the Critics of Corporate Criminal Liability’. American Criminal Law Review 46: 1481–1505.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, T., Bowie, N., and Arnold, D. (eds.). 2008. Ethical Theory and Business 8th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bebchuk, L. A. and Tallarita, R. 2020. ‘The Illusory Promise of Stakeholder Governance’ Cornell Law Review 106: 91–178.Google Scholar
Becker, Y. and Lange, F. 2014. Linien der Rechtsprechung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts – erörtert von den wissenschaftlichen Mitarbeitern und Mitarbeiterinnen. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beever, A. 2011. ‘Our Most Fundamental Rights’. In Robertson, A. and Nolan, D. (eds.).Google Scholar
Begg, D., Fischer, S. and Dornbusch, R. 2005. Economics. Columbus: McGraw Hill Education.Google Scholar
Beitz, C. 2009. The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. 1987. ‘Anarchical Fallacies’. In Waldron, J. (ed.).Google Scholar
Berle, A. 1931. ‘Corporate Powers as Powers in Trust’. Harvard Law Review 44: 1049–1074.Google Scholar
Berle, A. A. and Means, G. C. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Besson, S. 2017. ‘Human Rights as Transnational Constitutional Law’. In Lang, A. F. and Wiener, A. (eds.).Google Scholar
Beyleveld, D. and Brownsword, R. 2001. Human Dignity in Bioethics and Biolaw. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bilchitz, D. I. 2007. Poverty and Fundamental Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bilchitz, D. I. 2008. ‘Corporate Law and the Constitution: Towards Binding Human Rights Responsibilities for Corporations’. South African Law Journal 124: 754–789.Google Scholar
Bilchitz, D. I. 2009. ‘Moving Beyond Arbitrariness: The Legal Personhood and Dignity of Non-Human Animals’. South African Journal on Human Rights 25: 38–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilchitz, D. I. 2010a. ‘Do Corporations Have Positive Fundamental Rights Obligations?’. Theoria 125: 1–35.Google Scholar
Bilchitz, D. I. 2010b. ‘The Ruggie Framework: An Adequate Rubric for Corporate Human Rights Obligations?’. SUR International Journal on Human Rights 12: 199–229.Google Scholar
Bilchitz, D. I. 2011a. ‘Should Religious Associations Be Allowed to Discriminate?’. South African Journal on Human Rights 27: 219–248.Google Scholar
Bilchitz, D. I. 2011b. ‘Does Balancing Adequately Capture the Nature of Rights?’. Southern African Public Law 25: 423–444.Google Scholar
Bilchitz, D. I. 2013. ‘A Chasm between “Is” and “Ought”? A Critique of the Normative Foundations of the SRSG’s Framework and the Guiding Principles’. In Deva, S. and Bilchitz, D. (eds.).Google Scholar
Bilchitz, D. I. 2014. ‘Necessity and Proportionality: Towards a Balanced Approach’. In Lazarus, L., McCrudden, C. and Bowles, N. (eds.).Google Scholar
Bilchitz, D. I. 2016a. ‘Corporations and the Limits of State-Based Models for Protecting Fundamental Rights in International Law’. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 23: 143–170.Google Scholar
Bilchitz, D. I. 2016b. ‘The Necessity for a Business and Human Rights Treaty’. Business and Human Rights Journal 1: 203–227.Google Scholar
Bilchitz, D. I. 2017a. ‘Putting Flesh on the Bone: What Should a Business and Human Rights Treaty Look Like?’. In Deva, S. and Bilchitz, D. (eds.).Google Scholar
Bilchitz, D. I. 2017b. ‘Corporate Obligations and a Business and Human Rights Treaty: a Constitutional Law Model?’. In Deva, S. and Bilchitz, D. (eds.).Google Scholar
Bilchitz, D.I. 2018. ‘Fundamental Rights as Bridging Concepts: Straddling the Boundary Between Ideal Justice and an Imperfect Reality’. Human Rights Quarterly 40: 119–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilchitz, D. 2021. ‘How can Rights be Individuated?’ In A. Linares-Cantillo (ed.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilchitz, D. I. and Ausserladscheider Jonas, L. 2016. ‘Proportionality, Fundamental Rights and the Duties of Directors’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 36: 828–854.Google Scholar
Bilchitz, D. I. and Deva, S. 2013. ‘The Human Rights Obligations of Business: A Critical Framework for the Future’. In Deva, S. and Bilchitz, D. (eds.).Google Scholar
Bilchitz, D. I., Metz, T. and Oyowe, O. 2017. Jurisprudence in an African Context. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Birchall, D. 2019. ‘Any Act, Any Harm, To Anyone: The Transformative Potential of “Human Rights Impacts” under the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights’. University of Oxford Human Rights Hub Journal 1: 120–147.Google Scholar
Black, C. 1967. ‘The Supreme Court 1966 Term – Foreword: “State Action,” Equal Protection, and California’s Proposition 14’. Harvard Law Review 81: 69–109.Google Scholar
Black, E. 2009. Nazi Nexus: America’s Corporate Connections to the Nazi Holocaust. Washington: Dialog Press.Google Scholar
Black, E. 2012. IBM and the Holocaust: The Strategic Alliance between Nazi Germany and America’s Most Powerful Corporation. Washington: Dialog Press.Google Scholar
Blair, M. 2003. ‘Locking in Capital: What Corporate Law Achieved for Business Organizers in the Nineteenth Century’. UCLA Law Review 51: 387–456.Google Scholar
Blair, M. M. and Stout, L. A. 1999. ‘A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law’. Virginia Law Review 85: 247–328.Google Scholar
Blair, C., Vidak-Gojkovic, E. and Meudic-Role, M.-A. 2018. ‘The Medium Is the Message: Establishing a System of Business and Human Rights Through Contract Law and Arbitration’. Journal of International Arbitration 35: 379–412.Google Scholar
Bonilla, D. 2013a. ‘Toward a Constitutionalism of the Global South’. In D. Bonilla (ed.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonilla, D. (ed.). 2013b. Constitutionalism of the Global South: the Activist Tribunals of India, South Africa and Colombia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Booysen, S (ed.). 2016. Fees Must Fall: Student Revolt, Decolonisation and Governance in South Africa. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botha, M. M. 2016. ‘Evaluating the Social and Ethics Committee: Is Labour the Missing Link?’ (Part 1) Tydskrif vir Hedendaagse Romeins-Hollandse Reg 79: 580–593.Google Scholar
Botha, M. M. 2017. ‘Evaluating the Social and Ethics Committee: Is Labour the Missing Link’ (Part 2) Tydskrif vir Hedendaagse Romeins-Hollandse Reg 80: 1–17.Google Scholar
Bottomley, S. 2007. The Constitutional Corporation: Rethinking Corporate Governance. Ashgate: New York.Google Scholar
Bowie, N. E. 2017. Business Ethics: A Kantian Perspective 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. 2006. ‘Responsive Regulation and Developing Economies’. World Development 34: 884–898.Google Scholar
Branson, D. M. 2002. ‘The Rule That Isn’t a Rule – The Business Judgment Rule’. Valparaiso University Law Review 36: 631–654.Google Scholar
Bratman, M. 2003. ‘Autonomy and Hierarchy’. Social Philosophy and Policy 20: 156–176.Google Scholar
Bratton, W. 1989. ‘Nexus of Contracts Corporation: a Critical Appraisal’. Cornell Law Review 74: 407–465.Google Scholar
Brenkert, G. and Beauchamp, T. (eds.). 2010. The Oxford Handbook of Business Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brinktrine, R. 2001. ‘The horizontal effect of human rights in German constitutional law: the British debate on horizontality and the possible role model of the German doctrine of “mittelbare Drittwirkung der Grundrechte”’. European Human Rights Law Review 4: 421–432.Google Scholar
Brown, G. 2003. ‘Proportionality and Just War’. Journal of Military Ethics 2: 171–185.Google Scholar
Brownsword, R., Micklitz, H., Niglia, L. and Weatherill, S. 2011. The Foundations of European Private Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Buchanan, G. S. 1997. ‘State Action and the Public/Private Distinction’. Harvard Law Review 123: 1248–1313.Google Scholar
Buhmann, K. 2013. ‘Navigating from ‘train wreck’ to being ‘welcomed’: negotiation strategies and argumentative patterns in the development of the UN Framework’. In S. Deva and D. Bilchitz (eds.).Google Scholar
Burkiczak, C. 2014. ‘Grundrechtswirkung zwischen Privaten’ in Y. Becker and F. Lange (eds.).Google Scholar
Campbell, T. 2012. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Beyond the Business Case to Human Rights’. In W. Cragg (ed.).Google Scholar
Campbell, T. and Bourne, K. (eds.). 2017. Political and Legal Approaches to Human Rights. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnwath, R. 2014. ‘From Rationality to Proportionality in the Modern Law’. Hong Kong Law Journal 44: 447–58.Google Scholar
Carrillo-Santarelli, N. 2018. ‘A Defence of Direct International Human Rights Obligations of (All) Corporations’. In J. L. Černič and N. Carrillo-Santarelli (eds).Google Scholar
Carroll, A. (ed.). 1977. Managing Corporate Social Responsibility. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Cassim, F. H. 2012. ‘The Duties and the Liability of Directors’ in F.H. Cassim (eds.).Google Scholar
Cassim, F. H., Cassim, M., Cassim, R., Jooste, R., Shev, J. and Yeats, J. (eds.). 2012. Contemporary Company Law 2nd ed. Cape Town: Juta.Google Scholar
Cepeda-Espinosa, M. 2004. ‘Judicial Activism in a Violent Context: The Origin, Role and Impact of the Colombian Constitutional Court’. Washington University Global Studies Law Review 3: 529–700.Google Scholar
Cepeda-Espinoza, M. and Landau, D. 2017. Colombian Constitutional Law: Leading Cases. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Černič, J. L. 2010. Human Rights Law and Business: Corporate Responsibility for Fundamental Human Rights. Amsterdam: Europa Law Publishing.Google Scholar
Černič, J. L. and Carrillo-Santarelli, N. 2018. The Future of Business and Human Rights: Theoretical and Practical Considerations for a UN Treaty. Cambridge: Intersentia.Google Scholar
Chappell, V. (ed.). 1994. Locke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, B. and Mitra, N. 2017. ‘The Genesis of the CSR Mandate in India: Demystifying the “Chatterjee Model”’. In N. Mitra and R. Schmidpeter (eds.).Google Scholar
Chatterjee, D. K. (ed.). 2004. The Ethics of Assistance: Morality and the Distant Needy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chayes, A. 1959. ‘The Modern Corporation and the Rule of Law’. In E. S. Mason (ed.).Google Scholar
Chemerinsky, E. 1985. ‘Rethinking State Action’. Northwestern University Law Review 80: 503–557.Google Scholar
Chirwa, D. 2006. ‘The Horizontal Application of Constitutional Rights in a Comparative Perspective’. Law Democracy and Development 10: 21–48.Google Scholar
Choudhury, B. 2005. ‘Beyond the Alien Tort Claims Act: Alternative Approaches to Attributing Liability to Corporations for Extraterritorial Abuses’. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 26: 43–75.Google Scholar
Ciepley, D. 2013. ‘Beyond Public and Private: Toward a Political Theory of the Corporation’. American Political Science Review 107: 139–158.Google Scholar
Clapham, Andrew. 2006. Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. 1937. ‘The Nature of the Firm’. Economica 4: 386–405.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. 1988. The Firm, the Market and the Law. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. 1995. Self-ownership, Freedom and Equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen-Eliya, M. and Porat, I. 2011. ‘Proportionality and the Culture of Justification’. American Journal of Comparative Law 59: 463–490.Google Scholar
Cohen-Eliya, M. and Porat, I. 2013. Proportionality and Constitutional Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, B. 1975. ‘Is Corporate Criminal Liability Really Necessary’. Southwestern Law Journal 29: 908–927.Google Scholar
Cragg, W. 2010. ‘Business and Human Rights: A Principle and Value-Based Analysis’. In G. Brenkert (ed.).Google Scholar
Cragg, W. (ed.). 2012. Business and Human Rights. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Craig, P. 2010. ‘Proportionality, Rationality and Review’. New Zealand Law Review 265–301.Google Scholar
Cranston, M. 1967. ‘Human Rights: Real and Supposed’. In D. D. Raphael (ed.).Google Scholar
Cruft, R., Liao, S. M., and Renzo, M. (eds.). 2015. Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cruft, R., Liao, S. M., and Renzo, M. 2015. ‘The Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights: An Overview’. In R. Cruft., S. M. Liao., and M. Renzo (eds.).Google Scholar
Cullity, G. 2004. The Moral Demands of Affluence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Currie, I. and De Waal, J. (eds.). 2013. The Bill of Rights Handbook 6th ed. Cape Town: Juta.Google Scholar
Da Silva, V. A. 2011. ‘Comparing the Incommensurable: Constitutional Principles, Balancing and Rational Decision’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 31: 273–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dafel, M. 2015. ‘The Directly Enforceable Constitution: Political Parties and the Horizontal Application of the Bill of Rights’. South African Journal on Human Rights 31: 56–85.Google Scholar
Dahan, Y., Lerner, H. and Milman-Sivan, F. 2011. ‘Global Justice, Labour Standards and Responsibility’. Theoretical Enquiries in Law 12: 117–142.Google Scholar
Davis, D., Geach, W. Loubser, A., Buba, Z., Burdette, D., Butler, D., Coetzee, L. and Mongalo, T. (eds.). 2019. Companies and Other Business Structures in South Africa 4th ed. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, K. 1977. ‘The Case for and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities’. In A. Carroll (ed.).Google Scholar
De Schutter, O. 2015. ‘Towards a New Treaty on Business and Human Rights’. Business and Human Rights Journal 1: 41–67.Google Scholar
De Schutter, O. (ed.). 2006. Transnational Corporations and Human Rights. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
De Wet, E. and Vidmar, J. 2012. Hierarchy in International Law: The Place of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Desautels-Stein, J. and Tomlins, C. (eds.). 2017. Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deva, S. 2012. Regulating Corporate Human Rights Violations: Humanizing Business. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Deva, S. 2013. ‘Treating Human Rights Lightly: a Critique of the Consensus Rhetoric and the Language Employed by the Guiding Principles’. In S. Deva and D. Bilchitz (eds.).Google Scholar
Deva, S. 2017. ‘Scope of the Proposed Business and Human Rights Treaty: Navigating Through Normativity, Law and Politics’. In S. Deva and D. Bilchitz (eds.).Google Scholar
Deva, S. and Bilchitz, D. (eds.). 2013. Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deva, S. and Bilchitz, D. (eds.). 2017. Building a Treaty on Business and Human Rights: Context and Contours. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dhir, A. 2006. ‘Realigning the Corporate Building Blocks: Shareholder Proposals as a Vehicle for Achieving Corporate Social and Human Rights Accountability’. American Business Law Journal 43: 365–412.Google Scholar
Dhir, A. 2009. ‘Politics of Knowledge Dissemination: Corporate Reporting, Shareholder Voice and Human Rights’. Osgood Hall Law Journal 47: 47–82.Google Scholar
Dhir, A. 2012. ‘Shareholder Engagement in the Embedded Business Corporation: Investment Activism, Human Rights and TWAIL Discourse’. Business Ethics Quarterly 22: 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicke, K. 2002. ‘The Founding Function of Human Dignity in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights’. In D. Kretzmer and E. Klein (eds.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dine, J. and Koutsias, M. 2005. Company Law 6th ed. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Donaghey, J. and Reinecke, J. 2018. ‘When Industrial Democracy Meets Corporate Social Responsibility – a Comparison of the Bangladesh Accord and Alliance as Responses to the Rana Plaza Disaster’. British Journal of Industrial Relations 56: 14–42.Google Scholar
Donaldson, T. 1989. The Ethics of International Business. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donnelly, J. 1998. International Human Rights 2nd ed. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Dorff, M. C. and Sabel, C. F. 1998. ‘A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism’. Columbia Law Review 98: 267–473.Google Scholar
Dusza, K. 1989. ‘Max Weber’s Conception of the State’. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 3: 71–105.Google Scholar
Dworkin, G. 1988. The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 1986. Law’s Empire. Cambridge: The Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 1996. Freedom’s Law: the Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 2000. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, D. and Thorburn, M. (eds.). 2016. Philosophical Foundations of Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, F. H. and Fischel, D. R. 1985. ‘Limited Liability and the Corporation’. University of Chicago Law Review 52: 89–117.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, F. H. and Fischel, D. R. 1991. The Economic Structure of Corporate Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Elkins, Z., Ginsburg, T. and Simmons, B. 2013. ‘Getting to Rights: Treaty Ratification, Constitutional Convergence, and Human Rights Practice’. Harvard International Law Journal 54: 61–95.Google Scholar
Elliott, M., Varuhas, J. N. E. and Wilson Stark, S. (eds.). 2018. The Unity of Public Law? Doctrinal, Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Elster, J. 1982. ‘Sour Grapes — Utilitarianism and the Genesis of Wants’. In A.K. Sen and B. Williams (eds.).Google Scholar
Emedi, S. J. 2011. ‘Utilizing Existing Mechanisms of International Law to Implement Human Rights Standards: States and Multinational Corporations’. Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 28: 629–658.Google Scholar
Endicott, T. 2014. ‘Proportionality and Incommensurability’. In G. Huscroft et al. (eds.).Google Scholar
Enriques, L. Hansmann, H., Kraakman, R. and Pargendler, M. 2017. ‘The Basic Governance Structure: Minority Shareholders and Non-Shareholder Constituencies’. In R. Kraakman et al. (eds.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, R. 2011. ‘Citizens United v. FEC: The Constitutional Rights that Big Corporations Should Have but Do Not Want’. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 34: 639–661.Google Scholar
Evans, B. A. 2015. ‘Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh: An International Response to Bangladesh Labor Conditions’. North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 40: 597–626.Google Scholar
Fagan, A. 2013. ‘Causation in the Constitutional Court: Lee v. Minister of Correctional Services’. Constitutional Court Review 5: 104–134.Google Scholar
Fallon, R. H. 2008. ‘The Core of an Uneasy Case for Judicial Review’. Harvard Law Review 121: 1693–1736.Google Scholar
Feinberg, J. 1980. Rights, Justice and the Bounds of Liberty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ferreras, I. 2017. Firms as Political Entities: Saving Democracy through Economic Bicameralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fineman, M. A. 2013. ‘Equality, Autonomy and the Vulnerable Subject in Law and Politics’. In M. A. Fineman and A. Grear (eds.).Google Scholar
Fineman, M. A. and Grear, A. (eds.). 2013. Vulnerability: Reflections on a New Ethical Foundation for Law and Politics. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Finn, M. 2015a. ‘Organs of State: an Anatomy’. South African Journal on Human Rights 31: 631–654.Google Scholar
Finn, M. 2015b. ‘Allpay Remedy: Dissecting the Constitutional Court’s Approach to Organs of State’. Constitutional Court Review 6: 258–272.Google Scholar
Finn, M. 2020. ‘Befriending the Bogeyman: Direct Horizontal Application in AB v. Pridwin’. South African Law Journal 137: 591–607.Google Scholar
Fletcher, G. P. 1987. ‘Law and Morality: a Kantian Perspective’. Columbia Law Review 87: 533–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonseca, A. 2010. ‘How Credible Are Mining Corporations’ Sustainability Reports? A Critical Analysis of External Assurance under the Requirements of the International Council on Mining and Minerals’. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 17: 355–370.Google Scholar
Fredman, S. 2008. Human Rights Transformed: Positive Rights and Positive Duties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. 2010. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L. and de Colle, S. 2010. Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
French, P. A. 1979. ‘The Corporation as a Moral Person’. American Philosophical Quarterly 16: 207–215.Google Scholar
French, P. A. 1995. Corporate Ethics. Dallas: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
French, P. A. 1996. ‘Integrity, Intentions and Corporations’. American Business Law Journal 34: 141–156.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1970. ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’. In T. Beauchamp et al. (eds.).Google Scholar
Friedman, N. 2014. ‘The South African Common Law and the Constitution: Revisiting Horizonality’. South African Journal on Human Rights 30: 63–88.Google Scholar
Friedman, N. 2020. ‘Corporations as Moral Agents: Trade-offs in Criminal Liability and Human Rights for Corporations’. The Modern Law Review 83: 255–284.Google Scholar
Friedmann, D. and Barak-Erez, D. (eds.). 2001. Human Rights in Private Law. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Frynas, J. 2009. Beyond Corporate Social Responsibility: Oil, Multinationals and Social Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gallegos, L. and Uribe, D. 2016. ‘The Next Step against Corporate Impunity: A World Court of Business and Human Rights?’ Harvard International Law Journal Online Symposium 57: 7–10.Google Scholar
Gardbaum, S. 2003. ‘The “Horizontal Effect of Constitutional Rights”’. Michigan Law Review 102: 388–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardbaum, S. 2008. ‘Human Rights as International Constitutional Rights’. European Journal of International Law 19: 749–768.Google Scholar
Gardbaum, S. 2013. The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gardbaum, S. 2017. ‘Positive and Horizontal Rights: Proportionality’s Next Frontier or a Bridge too Far?’ In V. Jackson and M. Tushnet (eds.).Google Scholar
Garrett, J. E. 1989. ‘Unredistributable Corporate Moral Responsibility’. Journal of Business Ethics 8: 535–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatto, A. 2011. Multinational Enterprises and Human Rights. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Gert, B. 2010. Hobbes. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gewirth, A. 1978. Reason and Morality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, M. M. 1966. Hobbes’ Science of Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. 1985. Protecting the Vulnerable: A Re-analysis of Our Social Responsibilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goodpaster, K. 2010. ‘Corporate Responsibility and Its Constituents’. In G. Brenkert and T. Beauchamp (eds.).Google Scholar
Grear, A. 2010. Redirecting Human Rights: Facing the Challenge of Corporate Legal Humanity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Grear, A. 2013. ‘Vulnerability, Advanced Global Capitalism and Co-Symptomatic Injustice: Locating the Vulnerable Subject’. In M. A. Fineman and A. Grear (eds.).Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. D. and Brotman, E. C. 2014. ‘Strict Vicarious Criminal Liability for Corporations and Corporate Executives: Stretching the Boundaries of Criminalization’. American Criminal Law Review 51: 79–98.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. 2008. On Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grimm, D. 2007. ‘Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence’. The University of Toronto Law Journal 57: 383–397.Google Scholar
Gyekye, K. 1997. Tradition and Modernity: Philosophical Reflections on the African Experience. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hannigan, B. 2018. Company Law 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hansmann, H. and Kraakman, R. 2000. ‘The End of History for Corporate Law’. Georgetown Law Journal 89: 439–468.Google Scholar
Hariri, Y. N. 2015. Sapiens: a Brief History of Humankind. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Hart, H. 1958. ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’. Harvard Law Review 71: 593–629.Google Scholar
Hart, H. 1997. The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Harvard Law Review. 2010. ‘State Action and the Public/Private Distinction’. Harvard Law Review 123: 1248–1314.Google Scholar
Havenga, M. 2015. ‘The Social and Ethics Committee in South African Company Law’. Tydskrif vir Hedendaagse Romeins-Hollandse Reg 78: 285–292.Google Scholar
Henkin, L. 1962. ‘Shelley v Kraemer: Notes for a Revised Opinion’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 110: 473–505.Google Scholar
Herman, B. 1993. The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Herting, S. and Stein, L. 2007. ‘The Evolution of Luhmann’s Systems Theory with Focus On the Constructivist Influence’. International Journal of General Systems 36: 1–17.Google Scholar
Hideg, I., Krstic, A., Trau, R. N. C. and Zarina, T. 2018. ‘The Unintended Consequences of Maternity Leaves: How Agency Interventions Mitigate the Negative Effects of Longer Legislated Maternity Leaves’. Journal of Applied Psychology 103: 1155–1164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, T. E. 1980. ‘Humanity as an End in Itself’. Ethics 91: 84–99.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. 1996. Leviathan (ed. R. Tuck). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodges, C. 2015. Law and Corporate Behaviour: Integrating Theories of Regulation, Enforcement, Compliance and Ethics. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Hoexter, C. 2018. ‘A Matter of Feel? Public Powers and Functions in South Africa’. In M. Elliott, J. N. E. Varuhas and S. Wilson Stark (eds.).Google Scholar
Hsieh, N. H. 2004. The Obligations of Transnational Corporations: Rawlsian Justice and the Duty of Assistance. Business Ethics Quarterly 14: 643–661.Google Scholar
Hsieh, N. H. 2009. ‘Does Global Business Have a Responsibility to Promote Just Institutions?’ Business Ethics Quarterly 19: 251–273.Google Scholar
Hudson, A. 2017. Understanding Company Law 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hugo, V. 1892. Les Miserables (trans. N. Denny). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hunt, M. 1998. ‘The Horizontal Effect of the Human Rights Act’. Public Law 423–443.Google Scholar
Huscroft, G., Miller, B. W. and Webber, G. 2014. Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification and Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishay, M. 2004. The History of Human Rights: From Ancient Times to the Globalization Era. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Itturalde, M. 2013. ‘Access to Constitutional Justice in Colombia: Opportunities and Challenges for Social and Political Change’. In D. Bonilla (ed.).Google Scholar
Jackson, V. and Tushnet, M. (eds.). 2017. Proportionality: New Frontiers, New Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jägers, N. 2013. ‘Will Transnational Private Regulation Close the Governance Gap?’. In S. Deva and D. Bilchitz (eds.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M. 2001. ‘Value Maximisation, Stakeholder Theory and the Corporate Objective Function’. European Financial Management 7: 297–317.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. H. 1976. ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure’. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–360.Google Scholar
Jhaveri, S. 2019. ‘Interrogating Dialogic Theories of Judicial Review’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 17: 811–835.Google Scholar
Joseph, S. 2004. Corporations and Transnational Human Rights Litigation. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Kahl, W. (ed.). 2018. Bonner Kommentar zum Grundgesetz. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Kampourakis, I. 2019. ‘CSR and Social Rights: Juxtaposing Societal Constitutionalism and Rights-Based Approaches Imposing Human Rights Obligations on Corporations’. Goettingen Journal of International Law 9: 537–569.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 2017. Groundwork for the Metaphysic of Morals (ed. J. Bennett) available at www.earlymoderntexts.com/assets/pdfs/kant1785.pdfGoogle Scholar
Karavias, M. 2013. Corporate Obligations under International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Karp, D. 2014. Responsibility for Human Rights: Transnational Corporations in Imperfect States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kater, J. 2016. Grundrechtsbindung und Grundrechtsfähigkeit gemischtwirtschaftlicher Aktiengesellschaften. Stuttgart: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, A. 2016. ‘The Constitutional Separation of Powers’. In D. Dyzenhaus and M. Thorburn (eds.).Google Scholar
Keay, A. 2007. ‘Tackling the Issue of the Corporate Objective: An Analysis of the United Kingdom’s Enlightened Shareholder Value Approach’. Sydney Law Review 29: 577–612.Google Scholar
Keay, A. 2011. The Corporate Objective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Keay, A. 2013. The Enlightened Shareholder Value Principle and Corporate Governance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keitner, C. 2011. ‘Rights beyond Borders’. Yale Journal of International Law 36: 55–114.Google Scholar
Kell, G. 2005. ‘The Global Compact: Selected Experiences and Reflections’. Journal of Business Ethics 59: 69–79.Google Scholar
Keller, H. and Grover, L. 2012. ‘General Comments of the Human Rights Committee and their Legitimacy’. In H. Keller and G. Ulfstein (eds.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, H. and Ulfstein, G. (eds.). 2012. UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies: Law and Legitimacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. 2003. The State of the Political: Conceptions of Politics and the State in the Thought of Max Weber, Carl Schmitt and Franz Neumann. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. 2011. ‘A Transnational Genealogy of Proportionality in Private Law’. In R. Brownsword, et al. (eds.).Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1984. ‘Concepts of Supervenience’. Philosophy and Phenomelogical Research 45: 153–176.Google Scholar
King, J. 2006. ‘Constitutional Rights and Social Welfare: A Comment on the Canadian Chaoulli Health Care Decision’. Modern Law Review 69: 631–643.Google Scholar
King, J. 2012. Judging Social Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
King, L. and Hamm, P. 2005. ‘Privatisation and State Capacity in Post-Communist Society’. William Davidson Institute Working Paper no 806 available at https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/40192/wp806.pdf;sequence=3Google Scholar
Kinley, D. and Tadaki, J. 2004. ‘From Talk to Walk: the Emergence of Human Rights Responsibilities for Corporations at International Law’. Virginia Journal of International Law 44: 931–1023.Google Scholar
Klare, K. and Davis, D. 2010. ‘Transformative Constitutionalism and the Common and Customary Law’. South African Journal on Human Rights 26: 403–509.Google Scholar
Klatt, M. 2011. ‘Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights’. Heidelberg Journal of International Law 71: 691–718.Google Scholar
Klatt, M. and Meister, M. 2012. The Constitutional Structure of Proportionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kloppers, H. J. 2013. ‘Driving Corporate Social Responsibility through the Companies Act: An Overview of the Role of the Social and Ethics Committee’. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 16: 166–199.Google Scholar
Klumpp, T., Mialon, H. and Williams, M. 2016. ‘The Business of American Democracy: Citizens United, Independent Spending and Elections’. The Journal of Law and Economics 59: 1–43.Google Scholar
Kockler, N. 2007. ‘The Principle of Double Effect and Proportionate Reason’. Virtual Mentor 9: 369–374.Google ScholarPubMed
Korsgaard, C. 2009. Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. 1997. ‘Hierarchy in International Law: A Sketch’. European Journal of International Law 8: 566–582.Google Scholar
Kraakman, R., Armour, J., Davies, P., Enriques, L., Hansmann, H., Gertig, H., Hopt, K., Kanda, H., Pargendler, M., Ringer, W.-G. and Rock, E. 2017. The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kremnitzer, M. 2010. ‘A Possible Case for Imposing Criminal Liability on Corporations in International Criminal Law’. Journal of International Criminal Justice 8: 909–918.Google Scholar
Kretzmer, D. and Klein, E. (eds.). 2002. The Concept of Human Dignity in Human Rights Discourse. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Kumm, M. 2010. ‘The Idea of Socratic Contestation and the Right to Justification: The Point of Rights-based Proportionality Review’. Law and Ethics of Human Rights 4: 142–175.Google Scholar
Kumm, M. and Comella, V. F. 2005. ‘What Is So Special about Constitutional Rights in Private Litigation? A Comparative Analysis of the Function of the State Action Requirements and Indirect Horizontal Effect’. In A. Sajo and R. Uitz (eds.).Google Scholar
Kuper, A. (ed.). 2005. Global Responsibilities: Who Must Deliver on Human Rights? New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Landau, D. 2012. ‘The Reality of Social Rights Enforcement’. Harvard International Law Journal 53: 190–247.Google Scholar
Lang, A. F. and Wiener, A. 2017. Handbook on Global Constitutionalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Laslett, K. 2012. ‘State Crime by Proxy: Australia and the Bougainville Conflict’. British Journal of Criminology 52: 705–723.Google Scholar
Lassman, P. and Spiers, R. (eds.). 1994. Weber: Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lazarus, L. McCrudden, C. and Bowles, N. (eds.). 2014. Reasoning Rights Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Leader, S. 2017. ‘Coherence, Mutual Assurance and the Rationale for a Treaty’. In S. Deva and D. Bilchitz (eds.).Google Scholar
Lee, I. 2009. ‘Citizenship and the Corporation’. Law and Social Inquiry 34: 129–168.Google Scholar
Lee, J. Y. and Hunt, P. 2012. ‘Human Rights Responsibilities of Pharmaceutical Companies in Relation to Access to Medicines’. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40: 220–233.Google Scholar
Lehr, A. and Jenkins, B. 2007. ‘Business and Human Rights – Beyond corporate spheres of influence’ (12 November 2007) available at https://business-humanrights.org/en/business-and-human-rights-%E2%80%93-beyond-corporate-spheres-of-influence (last accessed 11 May 2020).Google Scholar
Leisner, W. 1960. Grundrechte und Privatrecht. Munich, C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Liebenberg, 2010. Socio-Economic Rights: Adjudication under a Transformative Constitution. Cape Town: Juta.Google Scholar
Liebenberg, S. 2020. ‘Between Sovereignty and Accountability: The Emerging Jurisprudence of the United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights under the Optional Protocol’. Human Rights Quarterly 42: 48–84.Google Scholar
Linares-Cantillo, A. (ed.). 2021. Constitutionalism: Old Dilemmas, New Insights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1988. Two Treatises of Government (ed. P. Laslett). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lopata, B. 1973. ‘Property Theory in Hobbes’. Political Theory 1: 203–218.Google Scholar
López Latorre, A. F. 2020. ‘In Defence of Direct Obligations for Businesses under International Human Rights Law’. Business and Human Rights Journal 5: 56–83.Google Scholar
Lübbe-Wolf, G. 1988. Die Grundrechte als Eingriffsabwehrrechte. Nomos: Baden-Baden.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. 1989. ‘Law as a Society System’. Northwestern University Law Review 83: 136–150.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. 1997. ‘Limits of Steering’. Theory, Culture & Society 14: 41–57.Google Scholar
Lustig, D. 2020. Veiled Power: International Law and the Private Corporation 1886 – 1981. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Macdonald, K. 2011. ‘Rethinking “Spheres of Responsibility”: Business Responsibility for Indirect Harm’. Journal of Business Ethics 99: 549–563.Google Scholar
Macek, E. E. 2002. ‘Scratching the Corporate Back: Why Corporations Have No Incentive to Define Human Rights’. Minnesota Journal of Global Trade 11: 101–124.Google Scholar
Madlanga, M. 2018. ‘The Human Rights Duties of Companies and Other Private Actors in South Africa’ Stellenbosch Law Review 29: 359–378.Google Scholar
Mares, R. 2010. ‘Global Corporate Social Responsibility, Human Rights and Law: An Interactive Regulatory Perspective on the Voluntary-Mandatory Dichotomy’. Transnational Legal Theory 1: 221–285.Google Scholar
Mason, E. S. (ed.). 1959. The Corporation in Modern Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
May, R. J. 1990. ‘Papua New Guinea’s Bougainville Crisis’. The Pacific Review 3: 174–177.Google Scholar
McBarnet, D. and Whelan, C. 1991. ‘The Elusive Spirit of the Law: Formalism and the Struggle for Legal Control’. Modern Law Review 54: 848–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mccorquodale, R. and Smit, L. 2017a. ‘Human Rights, Responsibilities and Due Diligence’. In S. Deva and D. Bilchitz (eds.).Google Scholar
Mccorquodale, R., Smit, L., Neely, S. and Brooks, R. 2017b. ‘Human Rights Due Diligence in Law and Practice: Good Practices and Challenges for Business Enterprises’. Business and Human Rights Journal 2: 195–224.Google Scholar
Mdumbe, F. 2005. ‘The Meaning of “Organ of State” in the South African Constitution’. Southern African Public Law 20: 1–28.Google Scholar
Meeran, R. 2011. ‘Tort Litigation against Multinational Corporations for Violation of Human Rights: An Overview of the Position Outside the United States’. City University of Hong Kong Law Review 3: 1–41.Google Scholar
Menzel, J. and Müller-Terpitz, R. (ed.). 2017. Verfassungsrechtsprechung, 3rd ed.Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Merhof, K. 2015. ‘Building a Bridge between Reality and the Constitution: The Establishment and Development of the Colombian Constitutional Court’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 13: 714–732.Google Scholar
Metz, T. 2010. ‘For the Sake of Friendship: Relationality and Relationship as Grounds of Beneficence’. Theoria 57: 54–76.Google Scholar
Metz, T. 2011. ‘Ubuntu as a Moral Theory and Human Rights in South Africa’. African Human Rights Law Journal 11: 532–559.Google Scholar
Metz, T. 2016. ‘The South African Student/Worker Protests in Light of Just War Theory’. In S. Booysen (ed.).Google Scholar
Meyersfeld, B. 2020. ‘The South African Constitution and the Human-Rights Obligations of Juristic Persons’. South African Law Journal 137: 439–478.Google Scholar
Meyerson, D. 2007. ‘Why Courts Should Not Balance Rights against the Public Interest’. Melbourne University Law Review 31: 801–830.Google Scholar
Meyerson, D. 2015. ‘The Moral Justification for the Right to Make Full Answer and Defense’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 35: 237–265.Google Scholar
Michelman, F. 2008a. ‘On the Uses of Interpretive ‘Charity’: Some Notes on Application, Avoidance, Equality and Objective Unconstitutionality from the 2007 Term of the Constitutional Court of South Africa’. Constitutional Court Review 1: 1–61.Google Scholar
Michelman, F. I. 2008b. ‘Socioeconomic Rights in Constitutional Law: Explaining America Away’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 6: 663–686.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1859. On Liberty. Available at www.utilitarianism.com/ol/one.htmlGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1863. Utilitarianism. Available at www.utilitarianism.com/mill2.htmGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. and Harkins, C. 2010. ‘Corporate Strategy, Corporate Capture: Food and Alcohol Industry Lobbying and Public Health’. Critical Social Policy 30: 564–589.Google Scholar
Mitra, N. and Schmidpeter, , R. 2017. Corporate Social Responsibility in India: Cases and Developments after the Legal Mandate. Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Mokgoro, Y. 1998. ‘Ubuntu and the Law in South Africa’. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal 1: 17–32.Google Scholar
Möller, K. 2012. The Global Model of Constitutional Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, G. 1999. ‘Corporate Moral Agency: Review and Implications’. Journal of Business Ethics 21: 329–343.Google Scholar
Moseneke, D. 2009. ‘Transformative Constitutionalism: Its Implications for the Law of Contract’. Stellenbosch Law Review 20: 3–13.Google Scholar
Moyn, S. 2010. The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Muchlinski, P. 2010. Multinational Enterprises and the Law 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Muchlinski, P. 2012. ‘Implementing the new UN Corporate Human Rights Framework: Implications for Corporate Law, Governance and Regulation’. Business Ethics Quarterly 22: 145–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muchlinksi, P. 2017. ‘The Impact of a Business and Human Rights Treaty on Investment Law and Arbitration’. In S. Deva and D. Bilchitz (eds.).Google Scholar
Mulgan, T. 2001. The Demands of Consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Müller-Hoff, C. 2012. ‘How Does the New Constitutionalism Respond to the Human Rights Challenges Posed by Transnational Corporations?’. In Nolte, D. and Schilling-Vacaflor, A. (eds.).Google Scholar
Mureinik, E. 1994. ‘A Bridge to Where? Introducing the Interim Bill of Rights’. South African Journal on Human Rights 10: 31–48.Google Scholar
Murphy, L. 2000. Moral Demands in Non-ideal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nader, R., Green, M. and Seligman, J. 1976. Taming the Giant Corporation. New York: Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Naniwadekar, M. and Varottil, U. 2016. The Stakeholder Approach toward Directors’ Duties under Indian Company Law: A Comparative Analysis. In M. Singh (ed.).Google Scholar
Nedelsky, J. 1993. ‘Reconceiving Rights as Relationships’. Review of Constitutional Studies 1: 1–26.Google Scholar
Ng, Y. F. 2019. ‘In the Moonlight? The Control and Accountability of Government Corporations in Australia’. Melbourne University Law Review 43: 303–336.Google Scholar
Nicholls, C. 2005. Corporate Law. Toronto: Emond Montgomery.Google Scholar
Nipperdey, H. C. 1962. ‘Grundrechte und Privatrecht’ In H. C. Nipperdey (ed.).Google Scholar
Nipperdey, H. C. (ed.). 1962. Festschrift für Erich Molitor. Munich and Berlin: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Nolan, A. 2009. ‘Addressing Economic and Social Rights Violations by Nonstate Actors through the Role of the State: A Comparison of Regional Approaches to the ‘Obligation to Protect’. Human Rights Law Review 9: 225–255.Google Scholar
Nolan, A. 2014. ‘Holding Non-State Actors to Account for Constitutional Economic and Social Rights Violations: Experiences and Lessons from South Africa and Ireland’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 12: 61–93.Google Scholar
Nolan, J. 2005. ‘With Power Comes Responsibility: Human Rights and Corporate Accountability’. University of New South Wales Law Journal 28: 581–613.Google Scholar
Nolan, J. 2013. ‘The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights: Soft Law or Not Law?’. In S. Deva and D. Bilchitz (eds.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, J. 2017. ‘Human Rights and Global Corporate Supply Chains: Is Effective Supply Chain Accountability Possible?’. In S. Deva and D. Bilchitz (eds.).Google Scholar
Nolte, D. and Schilling-Vacaflor, A. (eds.). 2012. New Constitutionalism in Latin America: Promises and Practices. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Noortmann, M., Reinisch, A. and Ryngaert, C. (eds.). 2015. Non-state Actors in International Law. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2000. Women and Human Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2005. ‘Beyond “Compassion and Humanity”: Justice for Nonhuman Animals’. In C. Sunstein and M. Nussbaum (eds.).Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2007. Frontiers of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, D. and Fedtke, J. 2007. Human Rights and the Private Sphere: A Comparative Study. London and New York: Routledge and Cavendish.Google Scholar
O’Neill, O. 1989. Constructions of Reason: Exploration of Kant’s Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Neill, O. 1996. Towards Justice and Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, O. 2001.‘Agents of Justice’. Metaphilosophy 32: 180–195.Google Scholar
O’Neill, O. 2004. ‘Global Justice: Whose Obligations?’ In D.K. Chatterjee (ed.).Google Scholar
Ougaard, M. 2004. ‘The CSR Movement and Global Governance’. In S. Singh-Sengupta (ed.).Google Scholar
Oyowe, O. A. 2014. ‘An African Conception of Human Rights? Comments on the Challenges of Relativism’. Human Rights Review 15: 329–347.Google Scholar
Pahuja, S. and Saunders, A. 2019. ‘Rival Worlds and the Place of the Corporation in International Law’. In J. von Bernstorff and P. Dann (eds.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palacios, M. 2006. Between Legitimacy and Violence: A History of Colombia 1975–2002 2nd ed. (trans. R. Stoller). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Pally, M. 2016. Commonwealth and Covenant. Michigan: Williams B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Parker, C. 2002. The Open Corporation: Effective Self-regulation and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parkinson, J. 1993. Corporate Power and Responsibility: Issues in the Theory of Company Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Parrish, A. L. 2007. ‘Storm in a Teacup: The US Supreme Court’s Use of Foreign Law’. University of Illinois Law Review 2007: 637–680.Google Scholar
Peretti, T. 2010. ‘Constructing the State Action Doctrine, 1940–1990’. Law & Social Inquiry 35: 273–310.Google Scholar
Pérez, J. F. J. 2012. ‘Colombia’s 1991 Constitution: A Right’s Revolution’. In Nolte, D. and Schilling-Vacaflor, A. (eds.).Google Scholar
Perez, O. 2016. ‘The Green Economy Paradox: A Critical Inquiry into Sustainability Indices’. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology 17: 153–219.Google Scholar
Peritz, R. J. R. 1996. Competition Policy in America: History, Rhetoric, Law Rev. Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peroni, L. and Timmer, A. 2013. ‘Vulnerable Groups: The Promise of an Emerging Concept in European Human Rights Convention Law’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 11: 1056–1085.Google Scholar
Perry, M. 2007. Towards a Theory of Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pogge, T. 2002. World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Poscher, R. 2003. Grundrechte als Abwehrrechte. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Pyle, A.J. 2013. Locke. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Quint, P. 1989. ‘Free Speech and Private Law in German Constitutional Theory’. Maryland Law Review 48: 247–349.Google Scholar
Ramasastry, A. 2015. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility versus Business and Human Rights: Bridging the Gap between Responsibility and Accountability’. Journal of Human Rights 14: 237–259.Google Scholar
Ramose, M. 1999. African Philosophy Through Ubuntu. Harare: Mond Books.Google Scholar
Randall, P. 1972. Apartheid and the Church: Report of the Church Commission of the Study Project on Christianity in Apartheid Society. Johannesburg: Christian Institute of Southern Africa.Google Scholar
Raphael, D. D. (ed.). 1967. Political Theory and the Rights of Man. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ratner, S. 2001. ‘Corporations and Human Rights: A Theory of Legal Responsibility’. Yale Law Journal 111: 443–545.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1999. A Theory of Justice Rev. ed. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Ray, B. 2016. Engaging with Social Rights: Procedure, Participation and Democracy in South Africa’s Second Wave. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Regan, A. 1998. ‘Causes and Course of the Bougainville Conflict’. Journal of Pacific History 33: 269–285.Google Scholar
Rios-Figueroa, J. A. 2012. ‘Institutional Design and Judicial Behaviour: Constitutional Interpretation of Criminal Due Process Rights in Latin America’. In Nolte, D. and Schilling-Vacaflor, A. (eds.).Google Scholar
Ritz, D. 2001. Defying Corporations, Defining Democracy: A Book of History and Strategy. New York: Apex Press.Google Scholar
Rivers, J. 2006. ‘Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review’. Cambridge Law Journal 65: 174–207.Google Scholar
Roach, K. and Budlender, G. 2005. ‘Mandatory relief and Supervisory Jurisdiction: When Is It Appropriate, Just and Equitable?’ South African Law Journal 122: 325–351.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. and Nolan, D. (eds.). 2011. Rights and Private Law. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Robins, N. 2006. The Corporation That Changed the World: How the East India Company Shaped the Modern Multinational. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Rogge, M. 2020. ‘Bringing Corporate Governance Down to Earth: From Culmination Outcomes to Comprehensive Outcomes in Shareholder and Stakeholder Capitalism’. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy (forthcoming) available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3572765.Google Scholar
Rogowski, R. 2013. Reflexive Labour Law in World Society. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Rogowski, R. 2015. ‘The Emergence of Reflexive Global Labour Law’. The German Journal of Industrial Relations 22: 27–90.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, M. 2002. ‘Hate Speech in Constitutional Jurisprudence: A Comparative Analysis’. Cardozo Law Review 24: 1523–1567.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J. J. 1947. The Social Contract (trans. C. Frankel). New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
Roux, T. 2009. ‘Principle and Pragmatism on the Constitutional Court of South Africa’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 7: 106–138.Google Scholar
Rueth, R. 2017. ‘Between Tradition, Cultural Influence, Social Structure, and Economic Growth: A Status Quo Analysis on CSR Engagement in India and a Critical Evaluation of the New CSR Law’. In N. Mitra and R. Schmidpeter (eds.).Google Scholar
Ruffert, M. 2001. Vorrang der Verfassung und Eigenständigkeit des Privatrechts. Eine verfassungsrechtliche Untersuchung zur Privatrechtswirkung des Grundgesetzes. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. 2011. ‘The Construction of the UN “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework for Business and Human Rights: The True Confessions of a Principled Pragmatist’. European Human Rights Law Review 2: 127–133.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. 2013. Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Ryan, A. 1999. ‘Hobbes’ Political Philosophy’. In T. Sorrell (ed.).Google Scholar
Sabel, C. F. and Simon, W. H. 2017. ‘Democratic Experimentalism’. In J. Desautels-Stein and C. Tomlins (eds.).Google Scholar
Sajo, A. and Uitz, R. (eds.). 2005. The Constitution in Private Relations: Expanding Constitutionalism. Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing.Google Scholar
Salomon, M. E. 2007. Global Responsibility for Human Rights: World Poverty and the Development of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sandin, P. 1999. ‘Dimensions of the Precautionary Principle’. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 5: 889–907.Google Scholar
Santoro, M. 2010. ‘Post-Westphalia and Its Discontents: Business, Globalization and Human Rights in Political and Moral Perspective’. Business Ethics Quarterly 20: 285–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santoro, M. and Shanklin, R. 2020. ‘Human Rights Obligations of Drug Companies’. Journal of Human Rights 19: 557–567.Google Scholar
Sarfaty, G. 2013. ‘Regulating Through Numbers: A Case Study of Corporate Sustainability Reporting’. Virginia Journal of International Law 53: 575–622.Google Scholar
Sarfaty, G. 2015. ‘Shining Light on Global Supply Chains’. Harvard International Law Journal 56: 419–464.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. 1972. ‘A Theory of Freedom of Expression’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: 204–226.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. 1975. ‘Preference and Urgency’. Journal of Philosophy 72: 655–669.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. 2000. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schaefer, J. P. 2012. ‘Neues vom Strukturwandel der Öffentichkeit’. Der Staat 51: 251–277.Google Scholar
Schauer, F. 2014. ‘Proportionality and the Question of Weight’. In G. Huscroft, B.W. Miller and G. Webber (eds.).Google Scholar
Scheffczyk, F. and Fabian-Wolter, Y. (eds.). 2017. Linien der Rechtsprechung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts vol. 4. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schiff, D. and Nobles, R. (eds.). 2003. Jurisprudence. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Schlaich, K. and Korioth, W. 2015. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht 10th ed. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Schwabe, J. 1971. Die Sogennante Drittwirkung der Grudrechte. Munich: Goldman Wilhelm.Google Scholar
Seitz, K. and Martens, J. 2017. ‘Philanthrolateralism: Private Funding and Corporate Influence in the United Nations’. Global Policy 8: 46–50.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 2004. ‘Elements of a Theory of Human Rights’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 32: 315–356.Google Scholar
Sen, A. and Williams, B. (eds.). 1982. Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelton, D. 2006. ‘Normative Hierarchy in International Law’. American Journal of International Law 100: 291–323.Google Scholar
Shin-Ichi, A. 2018. ‘A Convention or a Recommendation? The Experience of International Labour Legislation’. In J. L. Černič and N. Carrillo-Santarelli (eds.).Google Scholar
Shue, H. 1980. Basic Rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Simester, A. 2005. ‘Is Strict Liability Always Wrong?’. In A. Simester (ed.).Google Scholar
Simester, A. (ed.). 2005. Appraising Strict Liability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, P. 2004. ‘Corporate Voluntarism and Human Rights: The Adequacy and Effectiveness of Voluntary Self-Regulation’. Industrial Relations 59: 101–141.Google Scholar
Simons, P. and Macklin, A. 2014. The Governance Gap: Extractive Industries, Human Rights and the Home State Advantage. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Singer, P. 1972. ‘Famine, Affluence, and Morality’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: 229–243.Google Scholar
Singh, M. (ed.). 2016. The Indian Yearbook of Comparative Law. India: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Singh-Sengupta, S. (ed.). 2004. Business-Social Partnership: an International Perspective. Jaipur: Aalekh.Google Scholar
Sinha, M. K. 2018. ‘The Applicability of Human Rights Treaties to Business Enterprises: A Case Study of India’. In J. L. Černič and N. Carrillo-Santarelli (eds.).Google Scholar
Sinkovits, N., Hoque, S. F. and Sinkovics, R. R. 2016. ‘Rana Plaza Collapse Aftermath: Are CSR Compliance and Auditing Pressures Effective?’ Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 49: 617–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skogly, S. 2017. ‘Regulatory Obligations in a Complex World: States’ Extraterritorial Obligations Relating to Business and Human Rights’. In S. Deva and D. Bilchitz (eds.).Google Scholar
Slye, R. C. 2008. ‘Corporations, Veils, and International Criminal Liability’. Brooklyn Journal of International Law 33: 955–973.Google Scholar
Smet, S. 2017. ‘Conflicts between Human Rights and the ECtHR: Towards a Structured Balancing Test’. In S. Smet and E. Brems (eds.).Google Scholar
Smet, S. and Brems, E. (eds.). 2017. When Human Rights Clash at the European Court of Human Rights: Conflict or Harmony? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, J. 2013. ‘Corporate Human Rights Obligations: Moral or Political?’ Business Ethics Journal Review 1: 7–13.Google Scholar
Smith, J. D. (ed.). 2009. Normative Theory and Business Ethics. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Sorrell, T. (ed.). 1999. The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steinhardt, R. H. 2005. ‘Corporate Responsibility and the International Law of Human Rights: The new Lex Mercatoria’ in P. Alston (ed.).Google Scholar
Stephens, B. 2002. ‘The Amorality of Profit: Transnational Corporations and Human Rights’ Berkeley Journal of International Law 20: 45–90.Google Scholar
Stone, C. 1975. Where the Law Ends: The Social Control of Corporate Behaviour. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Stone, R. and Devenney, J. 2013. The Modern Law of Contract 10th ed. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stout, L. 2012. The Shareholder Value Myth: How Putting Shareholders First Harms Investors, Corporations and the Public. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
Sumner, L. W. 1989. The Moral Foundation of Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sundaram, J. 2018. Pharmaceutical Patent Protection and World Trade Law: The Unresolved Problem of Access to Medicines. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, C. 1996a. ‘Foreword: Leaving Things Undecided’. Harvard Law Review 110: 4–101.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. 1996b. ‘On the Expressive Function of Law’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144: 2021–2053.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. and Nussbaum, M. (eds.). 2005. Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 2015. ‘Using Securities Disclosures to Advance Human Rights: A Consideration of Dodd-Frank Section 1502 and the Securities and Exchange Commission Conflict Minerals Rule’. Journal of Human Rights 14: 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G. 2002. ‘The Horizontal Effect of Human Rights Provisions, the German Model and its Applicability to Common-Law Jurisdictions’. King’s Law Journal 13: 187–218.Google Scholar
Teubner, G. 1985. ‘After Legal Instrumentalism? Strategic Models of Post-Regulatory Law’. In G. Teubner (ed.).Google Scholar
Teubner, G. (ed.). 1985. Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Teubner, G., Nobles, R. and Schiff, D. 2003. ‘The Autonomy of Law: An Introduction to Legal Autopoiesis’ in D. Schiff and R. Nobles (eds.).Google Scholar
Thompson, H. 1991. ‘The Economic Causes and Consequences of the Bougainville Crisis’. Resources Policy 17: 69–85.Google Scholar
Timmer, A. 2013. ‘A Quiet Revolution: Vulnerability in the European Court of Human Rights’. In Fineman, M. A. and Grear, A. (eds.).Google Scholar
Tófalo, I. 2006. ‘Overt and Hidden Accomplices: Transnational Corporations’ Range of Complicity for Human Rights Violations’. In De Schutter, O. (ed.).Google Scholar
Tsakyrakis, S. 2009. ‘Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights?’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 7: 468–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, M. 2003. ‘The Issue of State Action/Horizontal Effect in Comparative Constitutional Law’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 1: 79–98.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M. 2009. ‘State Action in 2020’. In J. M. Balkin and R. B. Siegel (eds.).Google Scholar
Urbina, F. 2012. ‘A Critique of Proportionality’. American Journal of Jurisprudence 57: 49–80.Google Scholar
Valentini, L. 2017. ‘Human Rights, the Political View and Transnational Corporations: An Exploration’. In T. Campbell and K. Bourne (eds.).Google Scholar
Van Alebeek, R. and Nollkaemper, A. 2012. ‘The Legal Status of Decisions by Human Rights Treaty Bodies in National Law’. In H. Keller and G. Ulfstein (eds.).Google Scholar
Van Alstine, M. 2009. ‘The Universal Declaration and Developments in the Enforcement of International Human Rights in Domestic Law’. Maryland Journal of International Law 24: 63–74.Google Scholar
Van Der Sijde, E. 2020. ‘Tenure Security for ESTA Occupiers: Building on the Obiter Remarks in Baron v. Claytile Limited’’. South African Journal on Human Rights 36: 74–92.Google Scholar
Van Ho, T. 2018. ‘Band-Aids Don’t Fix Bullet Holes: In Defence of a Traditional State-Centric Approach’. In J.L. Černič and N. Carrillo-Santarelli (eds.).Google Scholar
Vázquez, C. M. 2005. ‘Direct versus Indirect Obligations of Corporations under International Law’. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 43: 927–959.Google Scholar
Von Bernstorff, J. and Dann, P. (eds.). 2019. The Battle for International Law: South–North Perspectives on the Decolonization Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Voorhoof, D. 2017. ‘Freedom of Expression versus Privacy and the Right to Reputation’. In S. Smet and E. Brems (eds.).Google Scholar
Waldron, J. 1987. ‘Jeremy Bentham’s Anarchical Fallacies’. In J. Waldron (ed.).Google Scholar
Waldron, J. (ed.). 1987. Nonsense upon Stilts: Bentham, Burke and Marx on the Rights of Man. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. 1993. Liberal Rights: Collected Papers 1981–1991. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. 2002. God, Locke and Equality: Christian Foundations in Locke’s Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Webber, G. 2009. The Negotiable Constitution: On the Limitation of Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webber, G. 2010. ‘Proportionality, Balancing, and the Cult of Constitutional Rights scholarship’. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 23: 179–202.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1919. ‘The Profession and Vocation of Politics’. In P. Lassman and R. Spiers (eds.).Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1978. Economy and Society (trans. C. Wittich and G. Roth). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wechsler, H. 1959. ‘Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law’. Harvard Law Review 73: 1–35.Google Scholar
Werhane, P. 1985. Persons, Rights and Corporations. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Werhane, P. 2016. ‘Corporate Moral Agency and the Responsibility to Respect Rights in the UN Guiding Principles: Do Corporations Have Moral Rights?’. Business and Human Rights Journal 1: 5–20.Google Scholar
West, R. L. 1990. ‘Equality Theory, Marital Rape and the Promise of the Fourteenth Amendment’. Florida Law Review 42: 45–79.Google Scholar
West, R. L. 2003. Re-Imagining Justice: Progressive Interpretations of Formal Equality, Rights, and the Rule of Law. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Wettstein, F. 2009. Multinational Corporations and Global Justice: Human Rights Obligations of a Quasi-Governmental Institution. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wettstein, F. 2010. ‘For Better or for Worse: Corporate Responsibility beyond “Do No Harm”’. Business Ethics Quarterly 20: 275–283.Google Scholar
Wettstein, F. 2012. ‘CSR and the Debate on Business and Human Rights: Bridging the Great Divide’. Business Ethics Quarterly 22: 739–770.Google Scholar
Whitney, T. 2015. ‘Conflict Minerals, Black Markets and Transparency: The Legislative Background of Dodd-Frank Section 1502 and Its Historical Lessons’. Journal of Human Rights 14: 183–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winfield, T. H. 1926. ‘The History of Negligence in the Law of Torts’. Law Quarterly Review 42: 184–201.Google Scholar
Wood, A. 1999. Kant’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, S. 2012. ‘The Case for Leverage-Based Corporate Human Rights Responsibility’. Business Ethics Quarterly 22: 63–98.Google Scholar
Woolman, S. 2006. ‘Application’. In S. Woolman et al. (eds.).Google Scholar
Woolman, S. 2007. ‘The Amazing, Vanishing Bill of Rights’. South African Law Journal 124: 762–794.Google Scholar
Woolman, S. 2013. The Selfless Constitution: Experimentalism and Flourishing as Foundations of South Africa’s Basic Law. Cape Town: Juta.Google Scholar
Woolman, S. and Bishop, M. (eds.). 2006. Constitutional Law of South Africa. Cape Town: Juta.Google Scholar
Woolman, S. and Botha, H. 2006. ‘Limitations’. In S. Woolman et al. (eds.).Google Scholar
Woolman, S. and Davis, D. 1996. ‘The Last Laugh: Du Plessis v. De Klerk, Classical Liberalism, Creole Liberalism and the Application of Fundamental Rights under the Interim and Final Constitutions’. South African Journal on Human Rights 12: 361–404.Google Scholar
Yeh, J (ed.). 2015. The Functional Transformation of Courts: Taiwan and Korea in Comparison. Taiwan: National Taiwan University Press.Google Scholar
Young, I. M. 2006. ‘Responsibility and Global Justice: A Social Connection Model’. Social Philosophy and Policy 23: 102–130.Google Scholar
Yune, J. 2015. ‘Judicial Activism and the Constitutional Reasoning of the Korean Supreme Court in the Field of Civil Law’. In J. Yeh (ed.).Google Scholar
Zerk, J. 2006. Multinationals and Corporate Social Responsibility: Limitations and Opportunities in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zippelius, R. 2018. ‘Art. 1 Abs. 1 u. 2’. in W. Kahl et al. (ed.).Google Scholar
Zuck, R. 2017. Das Recht der Verfassungsbeschwerde, 5th ed. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Al Hussein, Z. R. ‘Ethical Pursuit of Prosperity’ (23 March 2015) available at www.lawgazette.co.uk/commentary-and-opinion/ethical-pursuit-of-prosperity/5047796.articleGoogle Scholar
Bafilemba, F., Mueller, T. and Lezhnev, S. ‘The Impact of Dodd-Frank and Conflict Minerals Reforms on Eastern Congo’s Conflict’ (2014) available at https://enoughproject.org/files/Enough%20Project%20-%20The%20Impact%20of%20Dodd-Frank%20and%20Conflict%20Minerals%20Reforms%20on%20Eastern%20Congo%E2%80%99s%20Conflict%2010June2014.pdfGoogle Scholar
British Institute of International and Comparative Law ‘A UK Failure to Prevent Mechanism for Corporate Human Rights’ (February 2020) available at www.biicl.org/publications/a-uk-failure-to-prevent-mechanism-for-corporate-human-rights-harms (‘BIICL Report, 2020’).Google Scholar
Castan Centre for Human Rights Law Monash University ‘Human Rights Translated 2.0: a Business Reference Guide’ (2017) available at www.ohchr.org/documents/publications/HRT_2_0_EN.pdf (‘The Human Rights Translated Report, 2017’).Google Scholar
Commission on Human Rights ‘Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Related Business Enterprises With Respect to Human Rights’ E/CN.4/2004/L.73/Rev.1(2004) available at www.refworld.org/pdfid/415298c04.pdfGoogle Scholar
Commission on Human Rights, ‘Interim Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises’, E/CN.4/2006/97 (2006) available at http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/business/RuggieReport2006.html (‘SRSG 2006 Interim Report’).Google Scholar
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment 3 on ‘the Nature of State Parties’ Obligations’, E/1991/23 (1990) available at www.refworld.org/pdfid/4538838e10.pdfGoogle Scholar
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment 4 on ‘The Right to Adequate Housing’, E/1992/23 (1991) available at www.refworld.org/docid/47a7079a1.htmlGoogle Scholar
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment 14 on ‘The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health’, E/C.12/2000/4 (2000) available at www.refworld.org/pdfid/4538838d0.pdfGoogle Scholar
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment 15 on ‘The Right to Water’, E/C.12/2002/11 (2003) available at www.refworld.org/pdfid/4538838d11.pdfGoogle Scholar
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment No.24 on ‘State Obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the Context of Business Activities’, E/C.12/GC/24 (2017) available at www.refworld.org/docid/5beaecba4.htmlGoogle Scholar
Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment No.16 on ‘State Obligations Regarding the Impact of the Business Sector on Children’s Rights’, CRC/C/GC/16 (2013) available at www.refworld.org/docid/51ef9cd24.htmlGoogle Scholar
Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (1789) available at http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/rightsof.aspGoogle Scholar
Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007) available at www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/declaration-on-the-rights-of-indigenous-peoples.htmlGoogle Scholar
Draft Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights E/CN.4/Sub.2/2003/12 (2003) available at http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/links/NormsApril2003.html (‘Draft Norms, 2003’).Google Scholar
European Commission ‘Study on Directors’ Duties and Sustainable Corporate Governance’ (2020) available at https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/e47928a2-d20b-11ea-adf7-01aa75ed71a1/language-en (‘Directors’ Duties Study, 2020’).Google Scholar
European Convention on Human Rights (1950) available at www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdfGoogle Scholar
Financial Reporting Council ‘The UK Corporate Governance Code’ (2018) available at www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/88bd8c45-50ea-4841-95b0-d2f4f48069a2/2018-UK-Corporate-Governance-Code-FINAL.pdfGoogle Scholar
Human Rights Council ‘Clarifying the Concepts of “Sphere of Influence” and “Complicity”’, A/HRC/8/16 (2008) available at https://www.refworld.org/docid/484d1fe12.html (‘Sphere of Influence Report’, 2008).Google Scholar
Human Rights Council, ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy: a Framework for Business and Human Rights’ A/HRC/8/5 (2008) available at https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/625292?ln=en (‘UN Framework 2008’).Google Scholar
Human Rights Council, ‘Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises’ A/HRC/14/27 (2010) available at www.refworld.org/docid/4c0759832.html (‘SRSG 2010 Report’).Google Scholar
Human Rights Council, ‘Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework’ A/HRC/17/31 (2011) available at www.ohchr.org/documents/publications/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_en.pdf (‘UNGPs’).Google Scholar
Human Rights Council, ‘Report on the Sixth Session of the Open-ended Intergovernmental Working Group on Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Respect to Human Rights’ A/HRC/46/XX (2020) available at www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/WGTransCorp/Session6/Pages/Session6.aspx (‘Draft Sixth Session Report 2020’).Google Scholar
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights available at www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx (‘ICCPR’).Google Scholar
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights available at www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CESCR.aspx (‘ICESCR’).Google Scholar
International Commission of Jurists ‘Corporate Complicity and Legal Accountability’ (2008) available at www.icj.org/report-of-the-international-commission-of-jurists-expert-legal-panel-on-corporate-complicity-in-international-crimes/ (‘ICJ Complicity Report, 2008’).Google Scholar
International Law Association. 2004. ‘Final Report on the Impact of Findings of the United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies’. International Law Association Reports of Conferences 71: 621–702 (‘2004 Treaty Bodies Report’).Google Scholar
Kay, J. ‘The Kay Review of UK Equity Markets and Long-term Decision-making’ (2012) available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/253454/bis-12-917-kay-review-of-equity-markets-final-report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Institute of Directors Southern Africa ‘King IV Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa’ (2016) available at https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.iodsa.co.za/resource/collection/684B68A7-B768-465C-8214-E3A007F15A5A/IoDSA_King_IV_Report_-_WebVersion.pdf (‘King IV Code’).Google Scholar
Matthysen, K. and Zaragoza Montejano, A. ‘‘Conflict Minerals’ Initiatives in DR Congo: Perceptions of Local Mining Communities’ (2013) available at http://afrikarabia.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/IPIS-Conflict-minerals-local-perception-novembre-2013-.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Corporate Affairs, India ‘Report of the High-Level Committee on Corporate Social Responsibility 2018’ (Released 2019) available at www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/pdf/CSRHLC_13092019.pdf (‘High-Level Committee Report 2018’).Google Scholar
Morrison, J. ‘the Business Case for Human Rights – Values, Expectations and Risk’ (2011) available at www.ihrb.org/pdf/IHRB_Speech_2011_04_28_John_Morrison_The_Business_Case_for_Human_Rights.pdfGoogle Scholar
MSI Integrity ‘Not Fit for Purpose: the Grand Experiment in Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives in Corporate Accountability, Human Rights and Global Governance’ (2020) available at https://www.msi-integrity.org/not-fit-for-purpose/ (‘Not Fit for Purpose Report’).Google Scholar
Open-ended Inter-governmental Working Group Chairmanship ‘Legally Binding Instrument to Regulate, in International Human Rights Law, the Activities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises’ (Second Revised Draft) (2020) available at https://media.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/7ebffa2b7510a719d61fdab83fd8b2c19de4c650.pdf (‘The 2nd Revised Draft Treaty’).Google Scholar
UK Joint Parliamentary Committee on Human Rights Human Rights and Business 2017: Promoting responsibility and ensuring accountability HL PAPER 153 HC 443 (5 April 2017) available at https://old.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/joint-select/human-rights-committee/inquiries/parliament-2015/inquiry/ (‘JPCHR Report, 2017’).Google Scholar
United Nations Charter available at www.un.org/en/sections/un-charter/un-charter-full-text/Google Scholar
Universal Declaration on Human Rights available at www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/ (‘UDHR’).Google Scholar
Working Group on Business and Human Rights on Corporate Human Rights Due Diligence, Report A/73/163 (2018) available at https://ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpage_e.aspx?si=A/73/163 (‘Working Group HRDD Report, 2018’).Google Scholar
Working Group on Business and Human Rights ‘Companion Note 1 to the Working Group’s 2018 Report to the General Assembly’ (2018) available at www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Business/Session18/CompanionNote1DiligenceReport.pdf (‘Working Group Companion Report 1, 2018’).Google Scholar
Working Group on Business and Human Rights ‘Companion Note 2 to the Working Group’s 2018 Report to the General Assembly’ available at www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Business/Session18/CompanionNote2DiligenceReport.pdf (‘Working Group Companion Report 2, 2018’).Google Scholar
Working Group on Business and Human Rights ‘Gender Dimensions of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights’ A/HRC/41/43 (2019) available at https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G19/146/08/PDF/G1914608.pdf?OpenElement (‘Working Group Gender Dimensions Report, 2019’).Google Scholar
Working Group on Business and Human Rights ‘Connecting the Business and Human Rights and the Anti-Corruption Agendas Report A/HRC/44/43 (2020) available at https://undocs.org/A/HRC/44/43 (‘Working Group Anti-Corruption Report, 2020).Google Scholar
Wu, B. and Zheng, Y. 2008. ‘A Long March to Improve Labour Standards in China: Chinese Debates on the New Labour Contract Law’ (2008) available at https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/iaps/documents/cpi/briefings/briefing-39-china-new-labour-contract-law.pdfGoogle Scholar
Al Hussein, Z. R. ‘Ethical Pursuit of Prosperity’ (23 March 2015) available at www.lawgazette.co.uk/commentary-and-opinion/ethical-pursuit-of-prosperity/5047796.articleGoogle Scholar
Bafilemba, F., Mueller, T. and Lezhnev, S. ‘The Impact of Dodd-Frank and Conflict Minerals Reforms on Eastern Congo’s Conflict’ (2014) available at https://enoughproject.org/files/Enough%20Project%20-%20The%20Impact%20of%20Dodd-Frank%20and%20Conflict%20Minerals%20Reforms%20on%20Eastern%20Congo%E2%80%99s%20Conflict%2010June2014.pdfGoogle Scholar
British Institute of International and Comparative Law ‘A UK Failure to Prevent Mechanism for Corporate Human Rights’ (February 2020) available at www.biicl.org/publications/a-uk-failure-to-prevent-mechanism-for-corporate-human-rights-harms (‘BIICL Report, 2020’).Google Scholar
Castan Centre for Human Rights Law Monash University ‘Human Rights Translated 2.0: a Business Reference Guide’ (2017) available at www.ohchr.org/documents/publications/HRT_2_0_EN.pdf (‘The Human Rights Translated Report, 2017’).Google Scholar
Commission on Human Rights ‘Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Related Business Enterprises With Respect to Human Rights’ E/CN.4/2004/L.73/Rev.1(2004) available at www.refworld.org/pdfid/415298c04.pdfGoogle Scholar
Commission on Human Rights, ‘Interim Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises’, E/CN.4/2006/97 (2006) available at http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/business/RuggieReport2006.html (‘SRSG 2006 Interim Report’).Google Scholar
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment 3 on ‘the Nature of State Parties’ Obligations’, E/1991/23 (1990) available at www.refworld.org/pdfid/4538838e10.pdfGoogle Scholar
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment 4 on ‘The Right to Adequate Housing’, E/1992/23 (1991) available at www.refworld.org/docid/47a7079a1.htmlGoogle Scholar
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment 14 on ‘The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health’, E/C.12/2000/4 (2000) available at www.refworld.org/pdfid/4538838d0.pdfGoogle Scholar
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment 15 on ‘The Right to Water’, E/C.12/2002/11 (2003) available at www.refworld.org/pdfid/4538838d11.pdfGoogle Scholar
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment No.24 on ‘State Obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the Context of Business Activities’, E/C.12/GC/24 (2017) available at www.refworld.org/docid/5beaecba4.htmlGoogle Scholar
Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment No.16 on ‘State Obligations Regarding the Impact of the Business Sector on Children’s Rights’, CRC/C/GC/16 (2013) available at www.refworld.org/docid/51ef9cd24.htmlGoogle Scholar
Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (1789) available at http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/rightsof.aspGoogle Scholar
Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007) available at www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/declaration-on-the-rights-of-indigenous-peoples.htmlGoogle Scholar
Draft Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights E/CN.4/Sub.2/2003/12 (2003) available at http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/links/NormsApril2003.html (‘Draft Norms, 2003’).Google Scholar
European Commission ‘Study on Directors’ Duties and Sustainable Corporate Governance’ (2020) available at https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/e47928a2-d20b-11ea-adf7-01aa75ed71a1/language-en (‘Directors’ Duties Study, 2020’).Google Scholar
European Convention on Human Rights (1950) available at www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdfGoogle Scholar
Financial Reporting Council ‘The UK Corporate Governance Code’ (2018) available at www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/88bd8c45-50ea-4841-95b0-d2f4f48069a2/2018-UK-Corporate-Governance-Code-FINAL.pdfGoogle Scholar
Human Rights Council ‘Clarifying the Concepts of “Sphere of Influence” and “Complicity”’, A/HRC/8/16 (2008) available at https://www.refworld.org/docid/484d1fe12.html (‘Sphere of Influence Report’, 2008).Google Scholar
Human Rights Council, ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy: a Framework for Business and Human Rights’ A/HRC/8/5 (2008) available at https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/625292?ln=en (‘UN Framework 2008’).Google Scholar
Human Rights Council, ‘Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises’ A/HRC/14/27 (2010) available at www.refworld.org/docid/4c0759832.html (‘SRSG 2010 Report’).Google Scholar
Human Rights Council, ‘Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations “Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework’ A/HRC/17/31 (2011) available at www.ohchr.org/documents/publications/guidingprinciplesbusinesshr_en.pdf (‘UNGPs’).Google Scholar
Human Rights Council, ‘Report on the Sixth Session of the Open-ended Intergovernmental Working Group on Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Respect to Human Rights’ A/HRC/46/XX (2020) available at www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/WGTransCorp/Session6/Pages/Session6.aspx (‘Draft Sixth Session Report 2020’).Google Scholar
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights available at www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx (‘ICCPR’).Google Scholar
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights available at www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CESCR.aspx (‘ICESCR’).Google Scholar
International Commission of Jurists ‘Corporate Complicity and Legal Accountability’ (2008) available at www.icj.org/report-of-the-international-commission-of-jurists-expert-legal-panel-on-corporate-complicity-in-international-crimes/ (‘ICJ Complicity Report, 2008’).Google Scholar
International Law Association. 2004. ‘Final Report on the Impact of Findings of the United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies’. International Law Association Reports of Conferences 71: 621–702 (‘2004 Treaty Bodies Report’).Google Scholar
Kay, J. ‘The Kay Review of UK Equity Markets and Long-term Decision-making’ (2012) available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/253454/bis-12-917-kay-review-of-equity-markets-final-report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Institute of Directors Southern Africa ‘King IV Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa’ (2016) available at https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.iodsa.co.za/resource/collection/684B68A7-B768-465C-8214-E3A007F15A5A/IoDSA_King_IV_Report_-_WebVersion.pdf (‘King IV Code’).Google Scholar
Matthysen, K. and Zaragoza Montejano, A. ‘‘Conflict Minerals’ Initiatives in DR Congo: Perceptions of Local Mining Communities’ (2013) available at http://afrikarabia.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/IPIS-Conflict-minerals-local-perception-novembre-2013-.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Corporate Affairs, India ‘Report of the High-Level Committee on Corporate Social Responsibility 2018’ (Released 2019) available at www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/pdf/CSRHLC_13092019.pdf (‘High-Level Committee Report 2018’).Google Scholar
Morrison, J. ‘the Business Case for Human Rights – Values, Expectations and Risk’ (2011) available at www.ihrb.org/pdf/IHRB_Speech_2011_04_28_John_Morrison_The_Business_Case_for_Human_Rights.pdfGoogle Scholar
MSI Integrity ‘Not Fit for Purpose: the Grand Experiment in Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives in Corporate Accountability, Human Rights and Global Governance’ (2020) available at https://www.msi-integrity.org/not-fit-for-purpose/ (‘Not Fit for Purpose Report’).Google Scholar
Open-ended Inter-governmental Working Group Chairmanship ‘Legally Binding Instrument to Regulate, in International Human Rights Law, the Activities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises’ (Second Revised Draft) (2020) available at https://media.business-humanrights.org/media/documents/7ebffa2b7510a719d61fdab83fd8b2c19de4c650.pdf (‘The 2nd Revised Draft Treaty’).Google Scholar
UK Joint Parliamentary Committee on Human Rights Human Rights and Business 2017: Promoting responsibility and ensuring accountability HL PAPER 153 HC 443 (5 April 2017) available at https://old.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/joint-select/human-rights-committee/inquiries/parliament-2015/inquiry/ (‘JPCHR Report, 2017’).Google Scholar
United Nations Charter available at www.un.org/en/sections/un-charter/un-charter-full-text/Google Scholar
Universal Declaration on Human Rights available at www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/ (‘UDHR’).Google Scholar
Working Group on Business and Human Rights on Corporate Human Rights Due Diligence, Report A/73/163 (2018) available at https://ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpage_e.aspx?si=A/73/163 (‘Working Group HRDD Report, 2018’).Google Scholar
Working Group on Business and Human Rights ‘Companion Note 1 to the Working Group’s 2018 Report to the General Assembly’ (2018) available at www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Business/Session18/CompanionNote1DiligenceReport.pdf (‘Working Group Companion Report 1, 2018’).Google Scholar
Working Group on Business and Human Rights ‘Companion Note 2 to the Working Group’s 2018 Report to the General Assembly’ available at www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Business/Session18/CompanionNote2DiligenceReport.pdf (‘Working Group Companion Report 2, 2018’).Google Scholar
Working Group on Business and Human Rights ‘Gender Dimensions of the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights’ A/HRC/41/43 (2019) available at https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G19/146/08/PDF/G1914608.pdf?OpenElement (‘Working Group Gender Dimensions Report, 2019’).Google Scholar
Working Group on Business and Human Rights ‘Connecting the Business and Human Rights and the Anti-Corruption Agendas Report A/HRC/44/43 (2020) available at https://undocs.org/A/HRC/44/43 (‘Working Group Anti-Corruption Report, 2020).Google Scholar
Wu, B. and Zheng, Y. 2008. ‘A Long March to Improve Labour Standards in China: Chinese Debates on the New Labour Contract Law’ (2008) available at https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/iaps/documents/cpi/briefings/briefing-39-china-new-labour-contract-law.pdfGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • David Bilchitz, University of Johannesburg
  • Book: Fundamental Rights and the Legal Obligations of Business
  • Online publication: 29 October 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108895224.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • David Bilchitz, University of Johannesburg
  • Book: Fundamental Rights and the Legal Obligations of Business
  • Online publication: 29 October 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108895224.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • David Bilchitz, University of Johannesburg
  • Book: Fundamental Rights and the Legal Obligations of Business
  • Online publication: 29 October 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108895224.013
Available formats
×