Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:23:23.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Elements of Statistical Decision Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Pranab K. Sen
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Julio M. Singer
Affiliation:
Universidade de São Paulo
Antonio C. Pedroso de Lima
Affiliation:
Universidade de São Paulo
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Statistical estimation as well as hypothesis testing may be viewed as important topics of a more general (and admittedly, more abstract) statistical decision theory (SDT). Having genesis in the theory of games and affinity with Bayes methods, SDT has been continuously fortified with sophisticated mathematical tools as well as with philosophical justifications. In conformity with the general objectives and contended intermediate level of this monograph, we intend to provide an overall introduction to the general principles of SDT with some emphasis on Bayes methodology (as well as some of its variants), avoiding the usual philosophical deliberations and mathematical sophistication, to the extent possible. See Berger (1993) for a detailed exposition.

The connection between estimation and hypothesis testing theories treated in the preceding chapters and SDT relates to the uncertainty of statistical conclusions or decisions based on observed data sets and to the adequate provision for quantifying the frequency of incorrect ones. This has generated the notion of loss and risk functions that form the foundation of SDT. This notion serves as a building block for the formulation of minimum risk and minimax (risk) estimation theory, where Bayes estimates have a focal stand. In the same vein, Bayes tests, which are not necessarily isomorphic to the Neyman–Pearson–Wald likelihood-based tests have cropped up in SDT. In either case, the basic difference comes from the concepts of prior and posterior distributions that bring in more room for subjective judgement in the inferential process.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×