Book contents
- Free Will and the Rebel Angels in Medieval Philosophy
- Free Will and the Rebel Angels in Medieval Philosophy
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Citation Method
- Introduction
- Part I Free Will
- Part II Whence Evil?
- Part III Angelic Sin
- Bibliography
- Index of Manuscripts
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 November 2020
Book contents
- Free Will and the Rebel Angels in Medieval Philosophy
- Free Will and the Rebel Angels in Medieval Philosophy
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Citation Method
- Introduction
- Part I Free Will
- Part II Whence Evil?
- Part III Angelic Sin
- Bibliography
- Index of Manuscripts
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Free Will and the Rebel Angels in Medieval Philosophy , pp. 267 - 286Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Primary Sources
Albert the Great (1890–99). B. Alberti Magni Ratisbonensis episcopi, Ordinis Prae-dicatorum, omnia, Opera, ed. Auguste, Borgnet. 38 vols. Paris: Vivès.Google Scholar
Albert the Great (1951–). Alberti Magni Opera omnia, ed. Geyer, Bernhard et al. Münster: Aschen-dorff. (Editio Coloniensis.)Google Scholar
Alexander of Hales (1951–57). Glossa in quatuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi, ed. Collegii, PP Bonaventurae, S.. 4 vols. Quaracchi (Florence): Collegium S. Bonaventurae.Google Scholar
Ambrose, (1896). De Isaac uel anima, ed. Schenkl, C, 639–700. CSEL 32/1. Vienna: Tempsky; Leipzig: Freytag.Google Scholar
Anselm of Canterbury (1938–61). S. Anselmi Cantuariensis Archiepiscopi Opera omnia, ed. Schmitt., Franciscus Salesius 6 vols. Edinburgh: Thomas Nelson & Sons.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1831–70). Opera. Edited by the Academia Regia Borussica. 5 vols. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Aristoteles Latinus (1972–74). Ethica Nicomachea, ed. Gauthier, René Antoine. 5 vols. Aristoteles Latinus 26/1–3. Leiden: Brill; Brussels: Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar
Augustine, (1891). De duabus animabus, ed. Zycha, J, 49–80. CSEL 25/1. Vienna: Tempsky; Leipzig: Freytag.Google Scholar
Augustine, (1892). De natura boni liber, ed. Zycha, J, 853–89. CSEL 25/2. Vienna: Tempsky; Leipzig: Freytag.Google Scholar
Augustine, (1894). De Genesi ad litteram libri duodecim, ed. Zycha, J. CSEL 28/1. Vienna: Tempsky; Leipzig: Freytag. Repr. New York: Johnson, 1970.Google Scholar
Augustine, (1902). De nuptiis et concupiscentia ad Valerium comitem libri duo, ed. Urba, K. F. and Zycha, J, 207–319. CSEL 42. Vienna: Tempsky; Leipzig: Freytag.Google Scholar
Augustine, (1902). De perfectione iustitiae hominis, ed. Urba, K. F. and Zycha, J, 1–48. CSEL 42. Vienna: Tempsky; Leipzig: Freytag.Google Scholar
Augustine, (1955). De ciuitate Dei libri XXII, ed. Dombart, B and Kalb, A. 2 vols. CCSL 47–48. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Augustine, (1962). De uera religione liber unus, ed. Daur, K.-D., 169–260. CCSL 32. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Augustine, (1969). Enchiridion ad Laurentium de fide et spe et caritate, ed. Evans, E, 21–114. CCSL 46. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Augustine, (1970). De libero arbitrio libri tres, ed. Green, W. M., 205–321. CCSL 29. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Augustine, (1974 and 2004). Contra Iulianum opus imperfectum. 2 vols. Books I–III, ed. Kalinka, E and Zelzer, M; Books IV–VI, ed. M. Zelzer. CSEL 85/1–2. Vol. 1: Vienna: Hoelder-Pichler-Tempsky; vol. 2: Vienna: Verlag der Öster-reichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Augustine, (1981). Confessionum libri XIII, ed. Verheijen, L. CCSL 27. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Augustine, (1984). Retractationum libri duo, ed. Mutzenbecher, Almut, 5–143. CCSL 57. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Augustine, (1992). De moribus ecclesiae catholicae et de moribus Manicheorum libri duo, ed. Bauer, J. B.. CSEL 90. Vienna: Hoelder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar
Augustine, (2000). De correptione et gratia, ed. Folliet, Georges, 127–284. CSEL 92. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Augustine, (2001–). Enarrationes in Psalmos, ed. Gori, Franco et al., CSEL 93/1A–95/5. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Averroes latinus (1562–74). Aristotelis opera cum Averrois commentariis. 12 vols. Venice: Apud Iunctas. (Editio Juntina.) Repr. Frankfurt am Main: Minerva, 1962.Google Scholar
Averroes latinus(1953). Averrois Cordubensis Commentarium Magnum in Aristotelis De Anima libros, ed. Stuart Crawford, F. Cambridge, MA: The Medieval Academy of America.Google Scholar
Averroes latinus (1969). Das neunte Buch (Θ) des lateinischen Großen Metaphysik-Kommentars von Averroes, ed. Bernhard, Bürke. Bern: Francke Verlag.Google Scholar
Averroes latinus (1971). Averrois in librum V (Δ) Metaphysicorum Aristotelis commentarius, ed. Ponzalli, Ruggero. Bern: Franke Verlag.Google Scholar
Avicenna latinus (1968–72). Liber de anima seu sextus de naturalibus, ed. Si-mone, Van Riet. 2 vols. Avicenna Latinus 1–2. Leuven: Peeters; Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Avicenna latinus (1977–80). Liber de philosophia prima sive scientia divina, ed. Simone, Van Riet. 2 vols. Avicenna Latinus 3–4. Leuven: Peeters; Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bernard of Clairvaux (1957–77). Sancti Bernardi opera, ed. Leclercq, J, Talbot, C. H., Rochais, H. M.. 9 vols. Rome: Editiones Cistercienses.Google Scholar
Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus (1877–80). Commentarii in librum Aristotelis Peri Hermeneias, ed. Meiser, Karl, 2 vols. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus (2005). Contra Eutychen et Nestorium. In De consolatione philosophiae, Opuscula theologica, ed. Moreschini, Claudio, 206–41. 2nd edn. Munich: K. G. Saur.Google Scholar
Bonaventure, (1882–1902). Opera omnia. 10 vols. Quaracchi and Grottaferrata: Editiones Collegii S. Bonaventurae ad Claras Aquas.Google Scholar
Chartularium Universitatis Parisiensis (1889–97). Edited by Denifle, Heinrich Suso and Chatelain, Émile. 4 vols. Paris: Delalain.Google Scholar
Durand of St. Pourçain (1571). D. Durandi a Sancto Porciano, Ord. Praed. et Meldensis Episcopi, In Petri Lombardi Sententias Theologicas Commentariorum libri IIII. Venice: Guerraea. Repr. Ridgewood, NJ: Gregg Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Durand of St. Pourçain (1962). Quaestiones disputatae de libero arbitrio, ed. Stella 1962, 471–99.Google Scholar
Durand of St. Pourçain (2012–). Durandi de Sancto Porciano Scriptum super IV libros Sententiarum, ed. Retucci, Fiorella, Jeschke, Thomas, et al. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Gerard of Abbeville (1993). Quodlibeta, ed. Pattin, Adriaan, L’anthropologie de Gérard d’Abbeville, 3–122. Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Giles of Rome (1521). In primum librum Sententiarum. Venice. Repr. Frankfurt am Main: Minerva, 1968.Google Scholar
Giles of Rome (1581). In secundum librum Sententiarum. 2 vols. Venice. Repr. Frankfurt am Main: Minerva, 1968.Google Scholar
Giles of Rome (1939–40). Aegidii Romani Quaestio de deceptione, ed. Gerardo Bruni, Analecta Augustiniana 17: 229–45.Google Scholar
Giles of Rome (1985–). Aegidii Romani Opera omnia, ed. Del Punta, Francesco, Fioravanti, Gian-franco, et al. Florence: Leo S. Olschi; Sismel – Edizioni del Galluzzo.Google Scholar
Godfrey of Fontaines (1904). Les quatre premiers Quodlibets de Godefroid de Fontaines, ed. De Wulf, Maurice and Auguste, Pelzer. Belges 2, Les Philo-sophes. Leuven: Institut Supérieur de Philosophie.Google Scholar
Godfrey of Fontaines (1914). Les Quodlibet cinq, six et sept de Godefroid de Fontaines, ed. De Wulf, Maurice and Hoffmans, Jean. Les Philosophes Belges 3. Leuven: Institut Supérieur de Philosophie.Google Scholar
Godfrey of Fontaines (1924–31). Le huitième, neuvième et dixième Quodlibets de Godefroid de Fontaines, ed. Hoffmans, Jean. Les Philosophes Belges 4. Leuven: Institut Supérieur de Philosophie.Google Scholar
Godfrey of Fontaines (1932). Les Quodlibets onze–quatorze de Godefroid de Fontaines, ed. Hoffmans, Jean. Les Philosophes Belges 5. Leuven: Éditions de l’Institut Supérieur de Philo-sophie.Google Scholar
Godfrey of Fontaines (1937). Le Quodlibet XV et trois Questions ordinaires de Godefroid de Fontaines, ed. Lottin, Odon. Les Philosophes Belges 14. Leuven: Éditions de l’Institut Supérieur de Philosophie.Google Scholar
Gonsalvus of Spain (1935). Quaestiones disputatae et de Quodlibet, ed. León, Amorós. Quaracchi: Editiones Collegii S. Bonaventurae Ad Claras Aquas.Google Scholar
Gregory the Great (1979–85). Moralia in Iob, ed. Adriaen, M. CCSL 143, 143A, 143B. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Henry of Ghent (1518). Quodlibeta. Paris: Jodocus Badius. Repr. Leuven: Bibliothèque S.J., 1961.Google Scholar
Henry of Ghent (1520). Summa quaestionum ordinariarum. Paris: Jodocus Badius. Repr. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute, 1953.Google Scholar
Henry of Ghent (1979–). Henrici de Gandavo Opera omnia, ed. Macken, Raymond et al. Press, Leuven University; Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Natalis, Hervaeus (1513). Quodlibeta, ed. Zimara, M. A., Venice. Repr. Ridgewood, NJ, The Gregg Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Natalis, Hervaeus (1647). In quatuor libros Sententiarum commentaria. Paris. Repr. Ridgewood, NJ, The Gregg Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Hugh of St. Cher (2013). In II Sententiarum, distinctiones 24–5, ed. Saccenti 2013, 215–32.Google Scholar
Hugh of St. Victor (2008–). Corpus Victorinum Textus historici, ed. Berndt, Rainer. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Scotus, John Duns (1891–95). Joannis Duns Scoti doctoris subtilis, ordinis minorum opera omnia. 26 vols. Paris: Louis Vivès. Repr. Westmead: Gregg Inter-national Publishers, 1969.Google Scholar
Scotus, John Duns (1950–). Doctoris subtilis et mariani Ioannis Duns Scoti Ordinis Fratrum Minorum Opera omnia, ed. Balić, C et al. Rome: Typis Vaticanis. (Editio Vaticana.)Google Scholar
Scotus, John Duns (1997–2006). Opera Philosophica, ed. Etzkorn, Girard J., Noone, Timothy B., et al. 5 vols. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute; Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Scotus, John Duns (2004–2008). The Examined Report of the Paris Lecture: Reportatio IA. Latin Text and English Translation, ed. Wolter, Allan B. and Bychkov, Oleg V.. 2 vols. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute.Google Scholar
Scotus, John Duns (2007). “John Duns Scotus’ Quodlibet: A Brief Study of the Manuscripts and an Edition of Question 16,” ed. Timothy B. Noone and H. Francie Roberts. In Schabel ed. 2006–2007, vol. 2: 131–98.Google Scholar
John of Damascus (1955). De fide orthodoxa. Version of Burgundio of Pisa and Cerbanus, ed. Buytaert, Eligius M.. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute.Google Scholar
John of Morrovalle (1947). Quaestio disputata “utrum obiectum voluntatis moveat ipsam ad actum volendi finem,” ed. Longpré 1947, 488–92.Google Scholar
John of Paris (1961–64). Commentaire sur les Sentences, Reportation, ed. Jean-Pierre, Muller. 2 vols. Rome: Herder.Google Scholar
John of Pouilly (Forthcoming). Quodlibet II, q. 11 and Quodlibet IV, q. 6 (selections), ed. Hoffmann forthcoming b, Appendix B and C.Google Scholar
Pecham, John (1948). Tractatus de anima Ioannis Pecham, ed. Melani, Gaudenzio. Florence: Edizioni “Studi Francescani.”Google Scholar
Pecham, John (1989). Quodlibeta Quatuor. Quodlibeta I–III ed. Etzkorn, Girard J.; Quodlibet IV (Romanum) ed. Delorme, Ferdinand, O.F.M., revised by Etzkorn, Girard J.. Grottaferrata: Editiones Collegii S. Bonaventurae ad Claras Aquas.Google Scholar
Pecham, John (2002). Quaestiones disputatae, ed. Etzkorn, Girard J., Spettmann, Hieronymus, and Oliger, Livarius. Grottaferrata: Editiones Collegii S. Bonaventurae ad Claras Aquas.Google Scholar
Abelard, Peter (1987). Theologia Scholarium, ed. Buytaert, Eligius M. and Mews, Constant J., 313–549. CCCM 13. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Auriol, Peter (1596). Commentariorum in primum librum Sententiarum. Rome: Ex typographia Vaticana. books.google.com/books?id=gEPqoVz0z9MC.Google Scholar
Auriol, Peter (1605). Commentarium in secundum librum Sententiarum. Rome. books.google.com/books?id=XvO1qQE8yU8C.Google Scholar
Auriol, Peter (1952). Scriptum super Primum Sententiarum. Prologue and distinctions 1–8, ed. Buytaert, Eligius M.. 2 vols. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute.Google Scholar
Auriol, Peter (2012). Reportatio in Secundum librum Sententiarum d. 4, q. 3, ed. Hoffmann 2012b, 65–75.Google Scholar
Lombard, Peter (1971–81). Sententiae in IV libris distinctae. 2 vols. 3rd edn. Grottaferrata: Editiones Collegii S. Bonaventurae ad Claras Aquas.Google Scholar
Olivi, Peter (1922–26). Quaestiones in secundum librum Sententiarum, ed. Bern-hard, Jansen. 3 vols. Quaracchi: Editiones Collegii S. Bonaventurae ad Claras Aquas.Google Scholar
Olivi, Peter (1964). De perfectione evangelica. Quaestio secunda, ed. Aquilino Emmen and Feliciano Simoncioli, Studi Francescani 61: 113–67.Google Scholar
Philip the Chancellor (1985). Philippi Cancellarii Parisiensis Summa de bono, ed. Niklaus, Wicki. 2 vols. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Proclus, (1960). Procli Diadochi Tria Opuscula (De providentia, libertate, malo), ed. Boese, Helmut. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pseudo-Dionysius (1937). Dionysiaca: Recueil donnant l’ensemble des traductions latines des ouvrages attribuées au Denys de l’Aréopage, ed. Philippe, Chevallier. 2 vols. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar
Pseudo-Dionysius (1990). De divinis nominibus, ed. Suchla, Beate Regina, 93–231. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brito, Radulphus (2008). Le questiones di Radulfo Brito sull’‘Etica Nicomachea’, ed. Costa, Iacopo. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Richard of Menneville (Mediavilla) (1591). Super quatuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi quaestiones subtilissimae. 4 vols. Brixen. Repr. Frankfurt am Main: Minerva, 1963.Google Scholar
Richard of Menneville (Mediavilla) (2011–14) Questions disputées, ed. Boureau, Alain, 6 vols. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Grosseteste, Robert (2017). The Two Recensions of On Free Decision, ed. Lewis, Neil. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Siger of Brabant (1954). De necessitate et contingentia causarum, ed. Duin 1954, 14–44.Google Scholar
Siger of Brabant (1972). Les quaestiones super librum de causis de Siger de Brabant, ed. Marlasca, Anto-nio. Leuven: Publications universitaires; Paris: Béatrice-Nauwelaerts.Google Scholar
Siger of Brabant (1974). Impossibilia. In Écrits de logique, de morale et de physique, ed. Bazán, Bernardo, 67–97. Leuven: Publications universitaires; Paris: Béatrice-Nauwelaerts.Google Scholar
Siger of Brabant (1981). Quaestiones in Metaphysicam. Édition revue de la reportation de Munich; texte inédit de la reportation de Vienne, ed. Dunphy, William. Louvain-la-Neuve: Éditions de l’Institut Supérieur de Philosophie.Google Scholar
Siger of Brabant (1983). Quaestiones in Metaphysicam. Texte inédit de la reportation de Cambridge; Édition revue de la reportation de Paris, ed. Maurer, Armand. Louvain-la-Neuve: Éditions de l’Institut Supérieur de Philosophie.Google Scholar
Tempier, Stephen (1999). Articuli condemnati anno 1277, ed. Piché, David, La Condamnation Parisienne de 1277: texte latin, traduction, introduction et commentaire. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Summa Halensis (1924–79). 6 vols. Quaracchi: Editiones Collegii S. Bonaventurae ad Claras Aquas.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1852–73). Sancti Thomae Aquinatis, Doctoris Angelici, Ordinis Praedicatorum Opera omnia, ad fidem optimarum editionum accurate recognita. 25 vols. Parma: Typis Petri Fiaccadori. Repr. New York: Musurgia, 1948–50.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1882–). Opera omnia, iussu Leonis XIII edita cura et studio Fratrum Prae-dicatorum. Rome. (Editio Leonina.)Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1929–47). Scriptum super libros Sententiarum magistri Petri Lombardi Episcopi Parisiensis, ed. Mandonnet, Pierre F. (vols. 1–2) and Moos, Marie Fabien (vols. 3–4). Paris: Lethielleux.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1950). In librum Beati Dionysii De divinis nominibus expositio, ed. Pera, C, Caramello, P, and Mazzantini, C. Turin: Marietti.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1965). Quaestiones disputatae, ed. Bazzi, P, Calcaterra, M, Centi, T. S., Odetto, E, and Pession, P. M.. 2 vols. 10th edn. Turin: Marietti.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1961–67). Summa contra Gentiles, ed. Marc, P. 3 vols. Turin: Marietti.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas (1972). Super Evangelium S. Ioannis lectura, ed. Cai, R, edn. Turin: Marietti.Google Scholar
Thomas of Sutton (1977). Quaestiones ordinariae, ed. Schneider, Johannes. Munich: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Walter of Bruges (1928). Quaestiones disputatae du B. Gauthier de Bruges: texte inédit, ed. Ephrem, Longpré. Les Philosophes Belges 10. Leuven: Institut Supérieur de Philosophie de l’Université.Google Scholar
de la Mare, William (1927). Correctorium fratris Thomae. In Les premières polémiques thomistes. I.–Le Correctorium Corruptorii “Quare,” by Palémon Glorieux. Le Saulchoir, Kain: Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques.Google Scholar
William of Auvergne (1674). Guilielmi Alverni opera omnia. 2 vols. Paris, 1674. Repr. Frankfurt: Minerva, 1963.Google Scholar
William of Auxerre (1980–87). Magistri Guillelmi Altissiodorensis Summa aurea, ed. Ribailler, Jean. 5 vols. Paris: Éditions du CNRS; Grottaferata (Rome): Editiones Collegii S. Bonaventurae ad Claras Aquas.Google Scholar
William of Ockham (1967–89). Opera philosophica et theologica. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Adams, Marilyn McCord (1992). “St. Anselm on Evil: De casu diaboli.” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 3: 423–51.Google Scholar
Adams, Marilyn McCord (1999). “Ockham on Will, Nature, and Morality.” In Spade ed. 1999, 245–72.Google Scholar
Adamson, Peter (2010). “Freedom and Determinism.” In The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, edited by Pasnau, Robert, 399–13. Cambridge Uni-versity Press.Google Scholar
Aertsen, Jan A., Emery, Kent, Jr., and Speer, Andreas eds. (2001). Nach der Verurteilung von 1277: Philosophie und Theologie an der Universität von Paris im letzten Viertel des 13. Jahrhunderts. Studien und Texte. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Alliney, Guido (2002). “Velle malum ex pura libertate: Duns Scoto e la banalità del male.” Etica e Politica 4/2. www2.units.it/etica/2002_2/indexalliney.htmlGoogle Scholar
Alliney, Guido (2005). “La ricezione della teoria scotiana della volontà nell’ambiente teologico parigino (1307–1316).” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 16: 339–404.Google Scholar
Alliney, Guido (2013). “Giovanni di Morrovalle e le affectiones anselmiane.” Archivum Fran-ciscanum Historicum 106: 569–84.Google Scholar
Alliney, Guido (2015). “Landolfo Caracciolo, Peter Auriol, and John Duns Scotus on Freedom and Contingency.” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales 82: 271–300.Google Scholar
Alliney, Guido (2017). “Fra Aristotele e Agostino: Per un paradigma della libertà nel XIII secolo.” In Leone and Valente eds. 2017, 171–96.Google Scholar
Alliney, Guido (2018). “Demoni e dannati: Libero arbitrio e ostinazione al male nel pensiero di Tommaso d’Aquino.” Medioevo 43: 259–83.Google Scholar
Alliney, Guido (2020). “Quando Duns Scoto ha cambiato idea sulla volontà? La causa del volere secondo la quaestio 6 delle Collationes parisienses.” Quaderni di Noctua 7: 605–41.Google Scholar
Alliney, Guido (Forthcoming). “Angeli mali: Ostinazione al male e libertà del bene secondo Duns Scoto.” In Will and Cognition: John Duns Scotus Reconsidered, edited by Porro, Pasquale and Sileo, Leonardo. Turnhout: Brepols; Bari: Edizioni di Pagina.Google Scholar
Babcock, William S. (1991). “Augustine on Sin and Moral Agency.” In The Ethics of St. Augustine, edited by Babcock, William S., 87–113. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Barnwell, Michael (2015). “The Problem with Aquinas’s Original Discovery.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 89: 277–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnwell, Michael (2019). “The Root of Sin is Still Undiscovered: A Counter-reply to Jensen.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 93: 147–60.Google Scholar
Beonio Brocchieri Fumagalli, Mariateresa (1969). Durando di S. Porziano: Elementi filosofici della terza redazione del “Commento alle Sentenze.” Florence: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Luca (1999). Censure et liberté intellectuelle à l’Université de Paris (XIIIe–XIVe siècles). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Bobillier, Stève. (2017). “Éthique et personne: la volonté et le choix du mal dans la pensée de Pierre de Jean Olivi (1248–1298).” Ph.D. dissertation, Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.Google Scholar
Boler, John F. (1993). “Transcending the Natural: Duns Scotus on the Two Affections of the Will.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67: 109–26.Google Scholar
Bonino, Serge-Thomas (2016). Angels and Demons: A Catholic Introduction, translated by Michael J. Miller. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Brampton, C. K. (1966). “Personalities at the Process against Ockham at Avignon, 1324–26.” Franciscan Studies 26: 4–25.Google Scholar
Briggs, Charles F. (2016). “Life, Works, and Legacy.” In A Companion to Giles of Rome, edited by Briggs, Charles F. and Eardley, Peter S., 6–33. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Brock, Stephen L. (2018). “Dead Ends, Bad Form: the Positivity of Evil in the Summa Theologiae.” In Aquinas’s Summa theologiae: A Critical Guide, edited by Hause, Jeffrey, 29–46. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brungs, Alexander (2006). “Intellekt, Wille und Willensschwäche im Korrek-torienstreit.” In Hoffmann, Müller, and Perkams eds. 2006, 265–83.Google Scholar
Burns, J. Patout (1991). “Augustine on the Origin and Progress of Evil.” In The Ethics of St. Augustine, edited by Babcock, William S., 67–85. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Burr, David (1976). “The Persecution of Peter Olivi.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 66/5: 3–98.Google Scholar
Byers, Sarah Catherine (2013). Perception, Sensibility, and Moral Motivation in Augustine: A Stoic-Platonic Synthesis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Caldera, Federica (2005). “Guglielmo de la Mare tra Bonaventura, Tommaso d’Aquino e Pietro di Tarantasia: Dipendenze testuali e originalità del Com-mento alle Sentenze.” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 98: 465–508.Google Scholar
Chappell, T. D. J. (1994). “Explaining the Inexplicable: Augustine on the Fall.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 62: 869–84.Google Scholar
Chappell, T. D. J. (1995). Aristotle and Augustine on Freedom: Two Theories of Freedom, Voluntary Action, and Akrasia. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Mark J. (2019) “An Early Version of Peter Lombard’s Lectures on the Sentences.” Traditio 74: 223–47.Google Scholar
Colish, Marcia L. (1995). “Early Scholastic Angelology.” Recherches de Théologie ancienne et médiévale 62: 80–109.Google Scholar
Colish, Marcia L. (2013). “Otto of Lucca, Author of the Summa sententiarum?” In Discovery and Distinction in the Early Middle Ages: Studies in Honor of John J. Contreni, edited by Chandler, Cullen J. and Stofferahn, Steven A., 57–72. Kalamazoo: Medi-eval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University.Google Scholar
Cory, Therese Scarpelli (2016). “Attention, Intentionality, and Mind-Reading in Aquinas’s De malo, q. 16, a. 8.” In Dougherty ed. 2016, 164–91.Google Scholar
Costa, Iacopo (2018). “Dieu et la volonté humaine: sur les motions divines chez Thomas d’Aquin.” In Actualité de Thomas d’Aquin, edited by Boulnois, Olivier, 117–34. Paris: Parole et silence.Google Scholar
Couenhoven, Jesse (2017). “Augustine’s Moral Psychology.” Augustinian Studies 48: 23–44.Google Scholar
Courtenay, William J. (1999). “The Academic and Intellectual Worlds of Ockham.” In Spade ed. 1999, 17–30.Google Scholar
Decorte, Jos (1983). “Der Einfluß der Willenspsychologie des Walter von Brügge OFM auf die Willenspsychologie und Freiheitslehre des Heinrich von Gent.” Franziskanische Studien 65: 215–40.Google Scholar
Del Punta, Francesco, Donati, Silvia, and Luna, Concetta (1993). “Egidio Romano.” In Dizionario biografico degli italiani vol. 42: 319–41. Rome: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana.Google Scholar
D’Ercole, Angela Federica (2017). “Il Peccato dell’Angelo: I dibattiti scolastici tra la fine del XIII e gli inizi del XIV secolo.” Ph.D. dissertation, Università degli studi di Salerno.Google Scholar
Dobler, Emil (2000). Zwei syrische Quellen der theologischen Summa des Thomas von Aquin: Nemesios von Emesa und Johannes von Damaskus. Ihr Einfluss auf die anthropologischen Grundlagen der Moraltheologie (S. Th. I–II, qq. 6–17; 22–48). Fribourg: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Dondaine, Hyacinthe-François (1955). “Le premier instant de l’ange d’après Thomas d’Aquin.” Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 39: 213–27.Google Scholar
Dougherty, Michael V., ed. (2016). Aquinas’s Disputed Questions on Evil: A Critical Guide, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dowd, Joseph Suk-Hwan (2015). “Aquinas on Demonic Obstinacy.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 89: 699–718.Google Scholar
Duba, William, and Schabel, Chris (2017). “Remigio, Auriol, Scotus, and the Myth of the Two-Year Sentences Lecture at Paris.” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales 84: 143–79.Google Scholar
Dubouclez, Olivier (2014). “Plura simul intelligere: Éléments pour une histoire du débat médiéval et renaissant sur la simultanéité des actes de l’intellect.” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales 81: 331–67.Google Scholar
Duin, J. J. (1954). La doctrine de la providence dans les écrits de Siger de Brabant. Leuven: Éditions de l’Institut Supérieur de Philosophie.Google Scholar
Dumont, Stephen D. (1992). “Time, Contradiction and Freedom of the Will in the Late Thirteenth Century.” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 3: 561–97.Google Scholar
Dumont, Stephen D. (1995). “The Origin of Scotus’s Theory of Synchronic Contingency.” The Modern Schoolman 72: 149–67.Google Scholar
Dumont, Stephen D. (2001). “Did Duns Scotus Change His Mind on the Will?” In Aertsen, Emery, and Speer eds. 2001, 719–94. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dumont, Stephen D. (2018a). “James of Viterbo on the Will.” In A Companion to James of Viterbo, edited by Côté, Antoine and Pickavé, Martin, 249–305. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Dumont, Stephen D. (2018b). “John Duns Scotus’s Reportatio Parisiensis Examinata: A Mystery Solved.” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales 85: 377–438.Google Scholar
Dumont, Stephen D. (Forthcoming). “John Duns Scotus’s Life in Context.” In Interpreting Duns Scotus, edited by Giorgio Pini. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eardley, Peter S. (2003). “Thomas Aquinas and Giles of Rome on the Will.” Review of Metaphysics 56: 835–62.Google Scholar
Eardley, Peter S. (2006a). “The Foundations of Freedom in Later Medieval Philosophy: Giles of Rome and His Contemporaries.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 44: 353–76.Google Scholar
Eardley, Peter S. (2006b). “The Problem of Moral Weakness, the Propositio Magistralis, and the Condemnation of 1277.” Mediaeval Studies 68: 161–203.Google Scholar
Eardley, Peter S. (2016). “Ethics and Moral Psychology.” In A Companion to Giles of Rome, edited by Briggs, Charles F. and Eardley, Peter S., 173–211. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Effler, Roy (1962). John Duns Scotus and the Principle “Omne quod movetur ab alio movetur.” St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute.Google Scholar
Ekenberg, Tomas (2016). “Voluntary Action and Rational Sin in Anselm of Canterbury.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24: 215–30.Google Scholar
Emili, A. (2010). “Minio, Giovanni (Giovanni da Morrovalle).” In Dizionario biografico degli italiani vol. 74: 650–4. Rome: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana.Google Scholar
Faes de Mottoni, Barbara (1991). “Bonaventura e la caduta degli angeli.” Doctor Seraphicus 38: 97–113.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Allan D. et al., eds. (1999). Augustine through the Ages: An Encyclopedia. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Flasch, Kurt (1991). “Freiheit des Willens: 850–1150.” In Die abendländische Frei-heit vom 10. zum 14. Jahrhundert: Der Wirkungszusammenhang von Idee und Wirklichkeit im europäischen Vergleich, edited by Fried, Johannes, 17–47. Sig-maringen: Jan Thorbecke Verlag.Google Scholar
Friedman, Russell L. (2002). “The Sentences Commentary, 1250–1320: General Trends, the Impact of the Religious Orders, and the Test Case of Predes-tination.” In Mediaeval Commentaries on the Sentences of Peter Lom-bard: Current Research, vol. 1, edited by Evans, G. R., 41–128. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Friedman, Russell L. (2007). “Dominican Quodlibetal Literature, ca. 1260–1330.” In Schabel ed. 2006–2007, vol. 2: 401–91.Google Scholar
Frost, Gloria (2010). “John Duns Scotus on God’s Knowledge of Sins: A Test-Case for God’s Knowledge of Contingents.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 48: 15–34.Google Scholar
Fussenegger, Gerold (1933). “Definitiones Capituli Generalis Argentinae celebrati anno 1282.” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 26: 127–40.Google Scholar
Gallagher, David M. (1991). “Thomas Aquinas on the Will as a Rational Appetite.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 29: 559–84.Google Scholar
Gallagher, David M. (1994). “Free Choice and Free Judgment in Thomas Aquinas.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 76: 247–77.Google Scholar
Gauthier, René-Antoine (1954). “Saint Maxime le Confesseur et la psychologie de l’acte humain.” Recherches de Théologie ancienne et médiévale 21: 51–100.Google Scholar
Gauthier, René-Antoine (1970). L’Éthique à Nicomaque. 2nd edn., vol. 1: Introduction. Leuven: Publications Universitaires; Paris: Béatrice-Nauwelaerts.Google Scholar
Gilson, Étienne (1952). “Les ‘philosophantes’.” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge 19: 135–40.Google Scholar
Glorieux, Palémon (1939). “Notations brèves sur Godefroid de Fontaines.” Recherches de Théologie ancienne et médiévale 11: 168–73.Google Scholar
González Ayesta, Cruz (2014). “¿Es la voluntad un apetito o un ‘poder’? La perspectiva de Duns Escoto.” Anuario filosófico 47: 77–102.Google Scholar
González Ayesta, Cruz (2019). “Duns Scotus on Freedom as a Pure Perfection: Necessity and Contingency.” In Philosophy of Mind in the Early and High Middle Ages, edited by Cameron, Margaret, 83–102. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goris, Harm (2012). “Angelic Knowledge in Aquinas and Bonaventure.” In Hoffmann ed. 2012, 149–85.Google Scholar
Hamesse, Jacqueline (2006). “Theological Quaestiones Quodlibetales.” In Schabel ed. 2006–2007, vol. 1: 17–48.Google Scholar
Hause, Jeffrey (1997). “Thomas Aquinas and the Voluntarists.” Medieval Philosophy and Theology 6: 167–82.Google Scholar
Hille, Markus (2005). Die Pariser Verurteilung vom 10. Dezember 1270 im Spannungsfeld von Universitätsgeschichte, Theologie und Philosophie. Leipzig: St.-Benno-Verlag.Google Scholar
Hissette, Roland (1977). Enquête sur les 219 articles condamnés à Paris le 7 mars 1277. Leuven: Publications Universitaires; Paris: Vander-Oyez.Google Scholar
Hissette, Roland (1982). “Albert le Grand et Thomas d’Aquin dans la censure parisienne du 7 mars 1277.” In Studien zur mittelalterlichen Geistesgeschichte und ihren Quellen, edited by Zimmermann, Albert, 226–46. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hocedez, Edgar (1925). Richard de Middleton: sa vie, ses œuvres, sa doctrine. Leuven: Spicilegium sacrum Lovaniense; Paris: Librairie Ancienne Honoré Champion, Édouard Champion.Google Scholar
Hödl, Ludwig (1960). “Die Aulien des Magister Johannes von Polliaco und der scholastische Streit über die Begründung der menschlichen Willensfreiheit.” Scholastik 35: 57–75.Google Scholar
Hödl, Ludwig (1999). “Die Diskussion des Johannes de Polliaco über die Lehrentscheidung der Pariser Theologen von 1285/86 ‘Non est malitia in voluntate … ’.” Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Âge 66: 245–97.Google Scholar
Hödl, Ludwig (2007). “The Quodlibeta of John of Pouilly († ca. 1328) and the Philosophical and Theological Debates at Paris 1307–1312.” In Schabel ed. 2006–2007, vol. 2: 199–229.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Fritz (1959). Die Schriften des Oxforder Kanzlers Johannes Lutterell: Texte zur Theologie des vierzehnten Jahrhunderts. Leipzig: St. Benno-Verlag.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias (2006). “Voluntariness, Choice, and Will in the Ethics Commentaries of Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas.” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 17: 71–92.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias (2007). “Aquinas and Intellectual Determinism: The Test Case of Angelic Sin.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 89: 122–56.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias (2008). “Henry of Ghent’s Voluntarist Account of Weakness of Will.” In Weakness of Will from Plato to the Present, edited by Hoffmann, Tobias, 115–37. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias (2012a). “Duns Scotus’s Intellectualist Account of Practical Knowledge.” In John Duns Scotus 1308–2008: The Opera Theologica of Scotus. Proceedings of “The Quadruple Congress” on John Duns Scotus, part 2, edited by Cross, Richard, 35–52. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias (2012b). “Peter Auriol on Practical Judgment and Angelic Sin.” In Contingenza e libertà: Teorie francescane del primo Trecento, edited by Alliney, Guido, Fedeli, Marina, and Pertosa, Alessandro, 45–75. Macerata: Edizioni Università di Macerata.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias (2012c). “Theories of Angelic Sin from Aquinas to Ockham.” In Hoffmann ed. 2012, 283–316.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias (2013). “Freedom Beyond Practical Reason: Duns Scotus on Will-Dependent Relations.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21: 1071–90.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias (2015). “Peter Auriol on Free Choice and Free Judgment.” Vivarium 53: 65–89.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias (2018). “Aquinas on Moral Progress.” In Aquinas’s Summa theologiae: A Critical Guide, edited by Hause, Jeffrey, 131–49. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias (2019). “Freedom without Choice: Medieval Theories of the Essence of Freedom.” In Williams ed. 2019, 194–216.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias (Forthcoming a). “Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, and Duns Scotus on the First Cause of Moral Evil.” In Will and Cognition: John Duns Scotus Reconsidered, edited by Porro, Pasquale and Sileo, Leonardo. Turnhout: Brepols; Bari: Edizioni di Pagina.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias (Forthcoming b). “The First Sin in the Early Fourteenth-Century Free Will Debate: Alexander of Alessandria and John of Pouilly.” In Libertés médiévales, edited by Trego, Kristell. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias, and Furlong, Peter (2016). “Free Choice.” In Dougherty ed. 2016, 56–74.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias, and Michon, Cyrille (2017). “Aquinas on Free Will and Intellectual Determinism.” Philosophers’ Imprint 17/10: 1–36. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3521354.0017.010.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias, ed. (2012). A Companion to Angels in Medieval Philosophy. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias, Müller, Jörn, and Perkams, Matthias, eds. (2006). Das Problem der Willensschwäche in der mittelalterlichen Philosophie / The Problem of Weakness of Will in Medieval Philosophy. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Tobias, Müller, Jörn, and Perkams, Matthias (2013). Aquinas and the Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, Terence (2007). The Development of Ethics. Vol. 1: From Socrates to the Reformation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, Steven (2018a). “Aquinas’s Original Discovery: A Reply to Barnwell.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 92: 73–95.Google Scholar
Jensen, Steven (2018b). Sin: A Thomistic Psychology. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, Steven (2019). “Proto-Sin: A Case Study.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 93: 161–71.Google Scholar
Kaye, Sharon M. (2004). “Why the Liberty of Indifference Is Worth Wanting: Buridan’s Ass, Friendship, and Peter John Olivi.” History of Philosophy Quarterly 21: 21–42.Google Scholar
Kent, Bonnie (1989). “Transitory Vice: Thomas Aquinas on Incontinence.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 27: 199–223.Google Scholar
Kent, Bonnie (1995). Virtues of the Will: The Transformation of Ethics in the Late Thirteenth Century. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Kent, Bonnie (2007). “Aquinas and Weakness of Will.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75: 70–91.Google Scholar
Kent, Bonnie (2012). “Reinventing Augustine’s Ethics: the Afterlife of City of God.” In Augustine’s City of God: A Critical Guide, edited by Wetzel, James, 225–44. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kent, Bonnie (2013). “Losable Virtue: Aquinas on Character and Will.” In Hoffmann, Müller, and Perkams eds. 2013, 91–109.Google Scholar
Kent, Bonnie (2017). “Our inalienable ability to sin: Peter Olivi’s rejection of asymmetrical freedom.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 25: 1073–92.Google Scholar
Kent, Bonnie, and Dressel, Ashley (2016). “Weakness and Willful Wrongdoing in Aquinas’s De malo.” In Dougherty ed. 2016, 34–55.Google Scholar
Kim, Yul (2016). “Thomas Aquinas on the Divine First Motion of the Human Will.” Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 63: 483–98.Google Scholar
King, Peter (1994). “Duns Scotus on the Reality of Self-Change.” In Self-Motion from Aristotle to Newton, edited by Gill, Mary Louise and Lennox, James G., 227–90. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
King, Peter (2010). “Scotus’s Rejection of Anselm: The Two-Wills Theory.” In Johannes Duns Scotus 1308–2008: Die philosophischen Perspektiven seines Werkes / Investigations into His Philosophy. Proceedings of “The Quadruple Congress” on John Duns Scotus, part 3, edited by Honnefelder, Ludger et al., 359–78. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute Publications; Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
King, Peter (2012). “Augustine and Anselm on Angelic Sin.” In Hoffmann ed. 2012, 261–81.Google Scholar
Knuuttila, Simo (1981). “Time and Modality in Scholasticism.” In Reforging the Great Chain of Being: Studies of the History of Modal Theories, edited by Knuuttila, Simo, 163–257. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Knuuttila, Simo (2004). Emotions in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Knuuttila, Simo (2017). “Change and Contradiction in Henry of Ghent.” Vivarium 55: 22–35.Google Scholar
Kobusch, Theo (2006). “Willensschwäche und Selbstbestimmung des Willens: Zur Kritik am abendländischen Intellektualismus bei Heinrich von Gent und in der franziskanischen Philosophie.” In Hoffmann, Müller, and Perkams eds. 2006, 249–63.Google Scholar
Koch, Joseph (1927). Durandus de S. Porciano O.P.: Forschungen zum Streit um Thomas von Aquin zu Beginn des 14. Jahrhunderts. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Koch, Joseph (1935–36). “Neue Aktenstücke zu dem gegen Wilhelm Ockham in Avignon geführten Prozess.” Recherches de Théologie ancienne et médiévale 7: 353–80; 8: 79–93; 168–97.Google Scholar
Laarmann, Matthias (1999). Deus primum cognitum: Die Lehre von Gott als Ersterkanntem des menschlichen Intellekts bei Heinrich von Gent († 1293). Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Langevin, Paul-Émile (1960). “Nécessité ou liberté, chez Godefroid de Fontaines.” Sciences Ecclésiastiques 12: 175–203.Google Scholar
Leone, Marialucrezia (2017a). “‘Non quaecumque necessitas excludit libertatem.’ Goffredo di Fontaines e la libertà della volontà e dell’intelletto.” Medioevo 42: 187–225.Google Scholar
Leone, Marialucrezia (2017b). “Utrum voluntas moveat se ipsam: Goffredo di Fontaines e l’auto-movimento della volontà.” In Leone and Valente eds. 2017, 259–307.Google Scholar
Leone, Marialucrezia, and Valente, Luisa, eds. (2017). Libertà e determinismo: Riflessioni medievali. Canterano: Aracne editrice.Google Scholar
Lewis, Neil (1996). “Power and Contingency in Robert Grosseteste and Duns Scotus.” In John Duns Scotus: Metaphysics and Ethics, edited by Honnefelder, Ludger, Wood, Rega, and Dreyer, Mechthild, 205–25. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Longpré, Éphrem (1947). “L’œuvre scolastique du cardinal Jean de Murro, O.F.M. († 1312).” In Mélanges Auguste Pelzer: Études d’histoire littéraire et doctrinale de la Scolastique médiévale offertes à Auguste Pelzer à l’occasion de son soixante-dixième anniversaire, 467–92. Leuven: Bibliothèque de l’Université; Éditions de l’Institut Supérieur de Philosophie.Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon (1937a). “Le libre arbitre chez Godefroid de Fontaines.” Revue néoscolastique de philosophie 40: 213–41.Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon (1937b). “Le thomisme de Godefroid de Fontaines en matière de libre arbitre.” Revue néoscolastique de philosophie 40: 554–73.Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon (1957a). “Libre arbitre et liberté depuis saint Anselme jusqu’à la fin du XIIIe siècle.” In Psychologie et morale aux XIIe et XIIIe siècles. 2nd edn., vol. 1: 11–389. Gembloux: Duculot.Google Scholar
Lottin, Odon (1957b). “La psychologie de l’acte humain chez saint Jean Damascène et les théologiens du XIIIe siècle occidental.” In Psychologie et morale aux XIIe et XIIIe siècles, 2nd edn., vol. 1: 393–424. Gembloux: Duculot.Google Scholar
Löwe, Can Laurens (2019). “Thomas Aquinas on Our Freedom to Use Our Habitus.” In The Ontology, Psychology and Axiology of Habits (Habitus) in Medieval Philosophy, edited by Faucher, Nicolas and Roques, Magali, 167–84. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Lowe, Elizabeth (2003). The Contested Theological Authority of Thomas Aquinas: The Controversies between Hervaeus Natalis and Durandus of St. Pourçain. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Scott (1995). “Synchronic Contingency, Instants of Nature, and Libertarian Freedom: Comments on ‘The Background to Scotus’s Theory of Will.’” The Modern Schoolman 72: 169–74.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Scott (1998). “Aquinas’s Libertarian Account of Free Choice.” Revue internationale de philosophie 52: 309–28.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Scott (1999). “Primal Sin.” In The Augustinian Tradition, edited by Matthews, Gareth B., 110–39. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Scott (2014). “Petit Larceny, the Beginning of All Sin: Augustine’s Theft of the Pears.” In Debates in Medieval Philosophy: Essential Readings and Con-temporary Responses, edited by Hause, Jeffrey, 5–27. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Macken, Raymond (1977). “Heinrich von Gent im Gespräch mit seinen Zeit-genossen über die menschliche Freiheit.” Franziskanische Studien 59: 125–82.Google Scholar
Macken, Raymond (1995). “The Human Will as Decision-Maker in the Human Person according to the Philosophy of Henry of Ghent.” Mediaevalia, Textos e Estudos 7–8: 427–39.Google Scholar
Maglio, Gianfranco (2016). Libero arbitrio e libertà in San Bonaventura. Padua: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Mandonnet, Pierre (1908–11). Siger de Brabant et l’averroïsme latin au XIIIme siècle. 2nd edn. 2 vols. Leuven: Institut Supérieur de Philosophie.Google Scholar
Marieb, Raymond E. (1964). “The Impeccability of the Angels Regarding Their Natural End.” The Thomist 28: 409–74.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques (1942). Saint Thomas and the Problem of Evil, translated by Gordon Andison. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques (1959). The Sin of the Angel: An Essay on a Re-interpretation of Some Thomistic Positions, translated by William L. Rossner. Westminster, MD: Newman Press.Google Scholar
Martel, Benoît (1968). La psychologie de Gonsalve d’Espagne. Montréal: Institut d’études médiévales; Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Matthews, Gareth (2014). “Wanting Bad Things.” In Debates in Medieval Philosophy: Essential Readings and Contemporary Responses, edited by Hause, Jeffrey, 28–37. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McCluskey, Colleen (2001a). “Albertus Magnus and Thomas Aquinas on the Freedom of Human Action.” In Albertus Magnus: Zum Gedenken nach 800 Jahren. Neue Zugänge, Aspekte und Perspektiven, edited by Senner, Walter, 243–54. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
McCluskey, Colleen (2001c). “Worthy Constraints in Albertus Magnus’s Theory of Action.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 39: 491–533.Google Scholar
McCluskey, Colleen (2017). Thomas Aquinas on Moral Wrongdoing. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miteva, Evelina (2018). “I Want to Break Free: Albert the Great’s Naturalistic Account of Freedom of Choice and Its Limitations.” Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter 21: 11–28.Google Scholar
Mühlenberg, Ekkehard (1969). “Das Verständnis des Bösen in neuplatonischer und frühchristlicher Sicht.” Kerygma und Dogma 15: 226–38.Google Scholar
Müller, Jörn (2007). “Willensschwäche im Voluntarismus? Das Beispiel Heinrichs von Gent.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 89: 1–29.Google Scholar
Müller, Jörn (2009). Willensschwäche im Denken der Antike und des Mittelalters: Eine Problem-geschichte von Sokrates bis Johannes Duns Scotus. Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Jörn (2018). “Der Herr und sein Diener mit der Lampe: Heinrich von Gent über Wille und Intellekt.” In Freiheit und Geschichte: Festschrift für Theo Kobusch zum 70. Geburtstag, edited by Müller, Jörn and Rode, Christian, 95–120. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Nicolas, J.-H. (1960). “La permission du péché.” Revue thomiste 60: 5–37, 185–206, 509–46.Google Scholar
Normore, Calvin (1994). “Ockham, Self-Motion, and the Will.” In Self-Motion from Aristotle to Newton, edited by Gill, Mary Louise and Lennox, James G., 291–303. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Normore, Calvin (1998). “Picking and Choosing: Anselm and Ockham on Choice.” Vivarium 36: 23–39.Google Scholar
Normore, Calvin (2003). “Duns Scotus’s Modal Theory.” In The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus, edited by Williams, Thomas, 129–60. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Normore, Calvin (2007a). “Freedom, Contingency, and Rational Power.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 81/2: 49–64Google Scholar
Normore, Calvin (2007b). “What Was Contingency.” In Laudemus viros gloriosos: Essays in Honor of Armand Maurer, edited by Houser, R. E., 283–96. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Oliva, Adriano (2005). “La deuxième rédaction du Correctorium de Guillaume de la Mare: les questions concernant la I Pars.” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 98: 423–64.Google Scholar
Opsomer, Jan, and Steel, Carlos (1999). “Evil without a Cause: Proclus’ Doctrine on the Origin of Evil, and Its Antecedents in Hellenistic Philosophy.” In Zur Rezeption der hellenistischen Philosophie in der Spätantike. Akten der 1. Tagung der Karl-und-Gertrud-Abel-Stiftung vom 22.–25. September 1997 in Trier, edited by Fuhrer, Therese and Erler, Michael, 229–60. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, Fran (2016). “Evil as Privation: the Neoplatonic Background to Aquinas’s De malo, I.” In Dougherty ed. 2016, 192–221.Google Scholar
Osborne Jr., Thomas M. (2005). “Ockham as a Divine-Command Theorist.” Religious Studies 41: 1–22.Google Scholar
Osborne Jr., Thomas M. (2012). “William of Ockham on the Freedom of the Will and Happiness.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86: 435–56.Google Scholar
Osborne Jr., Thomas M. (2013). “Giles of Rome, Henry of Ghent, and Godfrey of Fontaines on Whether to See God Is to Love Him.” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales 80: 57–76.Google Scholar
Osborne Jr., Thomas M. (2014). Human Action in Thomas Aquinas, John Duns Scotus, and William of Ockham. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Panaccio, Claude (2012). “Intellections and Volitions in Ockham’s Nominalism.” In Emotion and Cognitive Life in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy, edited by Pickavé, Martin and Shapiro, Lisa, 75–93. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert (1999). “Olivi on Human Freedom.” In Pierre de Jean Olivi (1248–1298): Pensée scolastique, dissidence spirituelle et société, edited by Boureau, Alain and Piron, Silvain, 15–25. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Pasnau, Robert (2002). Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature: A Philosophical Study of Summa theologiae 1ª 75–89. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peck, John W. (2014). “Angelic Primal Sin: A Test Case for Aquinas’ Intellectualism.” Gregorianum 95: 105–26.Google Scholar
Perkams, Matthias (2012). “Bernhard von Clairvaux, Robert von Melun und die Anfänge des mittelalterlichen Voluntarismus.” Vivarium 50: 1–32.Google Scholar
Perler, Dominik (2008). “Thought Experiments: The Methodological Function of Angels in Late Medieval Epistemology.” In Iribarren and Lenz eds. 2008, 143–53.Google Scholar
Perler, Dominik (2020). Eine Person sein: Philosophische Debatten im Spätmittelalter. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Pickavé, Martin (2012). “Que signifie ‘être libre’? Le cas Henri de Gand.” Médiévales 63: 91–104.Google Scholar
Pickavé, Martin (2013). “Aquinas on Incontinence and Psychological Weakness.” In Hoffmann, Müller, and Perkams eds. 2013, 184–202.Google Scholar
Pini, Giorgio (2013). “What Lucifer Wanted: Anselm, Aquinas, and Scotus on the Object of the First Evil Choice.” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 1: 61–82.Google Scholar
Piron, Sylvain (2003). “The Formation of Olivi’s Intellectual Project: ‘Petrus Ioannis Olivi and the Philosophers’ Thirty Years Later.” Oliviana 1. http://journals.openedition.org/oliviana/8.Google Scholar
Piron, Sylvain (2006). “Franciscan Quodlibeta in Southern Studia and at Paris, 1280–1300.” In Schabel ed. 2006–2007, vol. 1: 403–38.Google Scholar
Piron, Sylvain (2020a). “Chronologie des écrits de Pierre de Jean Olivi. Première partie: avant 1279.” Oliviana 6. http://journals.openedition.org/oliviana/1035.Google Scholar
Piron, Sylvain (2020b). “Chronologie des écrits de Pierre de Jean Olivi. Deuxième partie: après l’été 1279.” Oliviana 6. http://journals.openedition.org/oliviana/1050.Google Scholar
Porro, Pasquale (2006). “Doing Theology (and Philosophy) in the First Person: Henry of Ghent’s Quodlibeta.” In Schabel ed. 2006–2007, vol. 1: 171–231.Google Scholar
Putallaz, François-Xavier (1995). Insolente liberté: Controverses et condamnations au XIIIe siècle. Paris: Cerf.Google Scholar
Putallaz, François-Xavier (2000). “Entre grâce et liberté: Pierre de Jean Olivi.” In Geistesleben im 13. Jahrhundert, edited by Aertsen, Jan A. and Speer, Andreas, 104–15. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Putallaz, François-Xavier (2010). “Censorship.” In The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy, edited by Pasnau, Robert, 99–113. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rigo, Caterina (2005). “Zur Redaktionsfrage der Frühschriften des Albertus Magnus.” In Albertus Magnus und die Anfänge der Aristoteles-Rezeption im lateinischen Mittelalter: Von Richardus Rufus bis zu Franciscus de Mayronis, edited by Honnefelder, Ludger et al., 325–74. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Rist, John M. (2014). Augustine Deformed: Love, Sin and Freedom in the Western Moral Tradition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, Christopher J. (1983). “Man’s Free Will in the Works of Siger of Brabant.” Mediaeval Studies 45: 155–99.Google Scholar
Saccenti, Riccardo (2013). Conservare la retta volontà: L’atto morale nelle dottrine di Filippo il Cancelliere e Ugo di Saint-Cher (1225–1235). Bologna: Società editrice il Mulino.Google Scholar
Saccenti, Riccardo (2016). Un nuovo lessico morale medievale: Il contributo di Burgundio da Pisa. Canterano: Aracne editrice.Google Scholar
San Cristóbal-Sebastián, Antonio (1958). Controversias acerca de la voluntad desde 1270 a 1300. Madrid: Editorial y librería CO. CUL. S.A.Google Scholar
Schabel, Christopher (2000). “Place, Space, and the Physics of Grace in Auriol’s Sentences Commentary.” Vivarium 38: 117–61.Google Scholar
Schabel, Christopher (2014). “John of Pouilly’s Quaestiones ordinariae de scientia Dei.” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales 81: 237–72.Google Scholar
Schabel, Christopher (2020). “Were There Sentences Commentaries?” In Commenter au Moyen Âge, edited by Bermon, Pascale and Moulin, Isabelle, 243–66. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Schabel, Christopher, ed. (2006–2007). Theological Quodlibeta in the Middle Ages. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Christian (2002). Unde malum: Die Frage nach dem Woher des Bösen bei Plotin, Augustinus, und Dionysius. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Christian (2006). The Philosophy of Dionysius the Areopagite: An Introduction to the Structure and the Content of the Treatise on the Divine Names. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Schlosser, Marianne (2014). “Bonaventure: Life and Works.” In A Companion to Bonaventure, edited by Hammond, Jay M., Wayne Hellmann, J. A., and Goff, Jared, 9–59. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Schneider, Johannes (1977). “Der Wille und seine Freiheit.” In Thomas of Sutton (1977), 165*–197*.Google Scholar
Schöllgen, Werner (1927). Das Problem der Willensfreiheit bei Heinrich von Gent und Hervaeus Natalis. Düsseldorf: Schwann.Google Scholar
Shanley, Brian J. (1998). “Divine Causation and Human Freedom in Aquinas.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 72: 99–122.Google Scholar
Shanley, Brian J. (2007). “Beyond Libertarianism and Compatibilism: Thomas Aquinas on Created Freedom.” In Freedom and the Human Person, edited by Velkley, Richard, 70–89. Washington DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Simoncioli, Feliciano (1956). Il problema della libertà umana in Pietro Giovanni Olivi e Pietro de Trabibus. Milan: Vita e pensiero.Google Scholar
Solère, Jean-Luc (2014). “Sine qua non Causality and the Context of Durand’s Early Theory of Cognition.” In Durand of Saint-Pourçain and His Sentences Commentary, edited by Speer, Andreas et al., 185–227. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent, ed. (1999). The Cambridge Companion to Ockham. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spiering, Jamie Anne (2010). “An Innovative Approach to Liberum Arbitrium in the Thirteenth Century.” Ph.D. dissertation. Washington DC: The Catholic University of America.Google Scholar
Spiering, Jamie Anne (2015). “‘What Is Freedom?’: An Instance of the Silence of St. Thomas.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 89: 27–46.Google Scholar
Stadter, Ernst (1971). Psychologie und Metaphysik der menschlichen Freiheit: Die ideengeschichtliche Entwicklung zwischen Bonaventura und Duns Scotus. Munich: Schöningh.Google Scholar
Steel, Carlos (2002). “Avicenna and Thomas Aquinas on Evil.” In Avicenna and His Heritage: Acts of the International Colloquium, Leuven – Louvain-la-Neuve, September 8 – September 11, 1999, edited by Janssens, Jules and De Smet, Daniel, 171–96. Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Stella, Propero T. (1962). “Le ‘Quaestiones de libero arbitrio’ di Durando da S. Porciano.” Salesianum 24: 450–524.Google Scholar
Suarez-Nani, Tiziana (2002a). Les anges et la philosophie: subjectivité et fonction cosmologique des substances séparées à la fin du XIIIe siècle. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Suarez-Nani, Tiziana (2002b). Connaissance et langage des anges selon Thomas d’Aquin et Gilles de Rome. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Szlachta, Michael (2018). “Peter John Olivi, Free Will, and the Threefold aspectus.” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales 85: 285–307.Google Scholar
Szlachta, Michael (2020). “Thomas of Sutton’s Intellectualist Doctrine of the Will’s Self-Motion.” Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 8.Google Scholar
Teske, Roland J. (1994). “The Will as King over the Powers of the Soul: Uses and Sources of an Image in the Thirteenth Century.” Vivarium 32: 62–71.Google Scholar
Teske, Roland J. (1996). “Henry of Ghent’s Rejection of the Principle: ‘omne quod movetur ab alio movetur.’” In Henry of Ghent: Proceedings of the International Colloquium on the Occasion of the 700th Anniversary of His Death (1293), edited by Vanhamel, Willy, 279–308. Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Teske, Roland J. (2011). “Henry of Ghent on Freedom of the Human Will.” In A Companion to Henry of Ghent, edited by Wilson, Gordon A., 315–35. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Thijssen, J. M. M. H. (1998). Censure and Heresy at the University of Paris 1200–1400. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Torrell, Jean-Pierre (2015). Initiation à Saint Thomas d’Aquin: Sa personne et son œuvre. Paris: Cerf.Google Scholar
Vanni Rovighi, Sofia (1964–65). “Notes sur l’influence de saint Anselme au XIIe siècle.” Cahiers de civilisation médiévale 7/28: 423–37; 8/29: 43–58.Google Scholar
Visser, Sandra, and Williams, Thomas (2004). “Anselm’s account of freedom.” In The Cambridge Companion to Anselm, edited by Davies, Brian and Leftow, Brian. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weisheipl, James A. (1965). “The Principle Omne quod movetur ab alio movetur in Medieval Physics.” Isis 56: 26–45.Google Scholar
Westberg, Daniel (1994). “Did Aquinas Change His Mind about the Will?” The Thomist 58: 41–60.Google Scholar
Wetzel, James (2012). “Augustine on the Origin of Evil: Myth and Metaphysics.” In Augustine’s City of God: A Critical Guide, edited by Wetzel, James, 167–85. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, Dominic (2016). “Peter of John Olivi’s Allusions to the Condemnation of 7 March 1277 in Question 57 of His Quaestiones in secundum librum Sententiarum.” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 109: 47–98.Google Scholar
Wieland, Georg (1981). Ethica – scientia practica: Die Anfänge der philosophischen Ethik im 13. Jahrhundert. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Wielockx, Robert (2011). “Henry of Ghent and the Events of 1277.” In A Companion to Henry of Ghent, edited by Wilson, Gordon A., 25–61. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wierzbicki, Mateusc J. (2016). “L’irremissibilità del peccato degli angeli secondo Alessandro di Hales.” Archivum Franciscanum Historicum 109: 585–96.Google Scholar
Williams, Thomas (1995). “How Scotus Separates Morality from Happiness.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 69: 425–45.Google Scholar
Williams, Thomas ed. (2019). The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Ethics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wippel, John F. (1973). “Godfrey of Fontaines and the Act-Potency Axiom.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 11: 299–317.Google Scholar
Wippel, John F. (1981). The Metaphysical Thought of Godfrey of Fontaines: A Study in Late Thirteenth-Century Philosophy. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Wippel, John F. (1984). “Divine Knowledge, Divine Power, and Human Freedom in Thomas Aquinas and Henry of Ghent.” In Metaphysical Themes in Aquinas, Thomas, 243–70. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Wippel, John F. (1995). “Thomas Aquinas and the Condemnation of 1277.” The Modern Schoolman 72: 233–72.Google Scholar
Wippel, John F. (1997). “Bishop Stephen Tempier and Thomas Aquinas: A Separate Process against Aquinas?” Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Theologie 44: 117–36.Google Scholar
Wippel, John F. (2002). “The Parisian Condemnations of 1270 and 1277.” In A Companion to Philosophy in the Middle Ages, edited by Gracia, Jorge J. E. and Noone, Timothy B., 65–73. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wippel, John F. (2007). “Godfrey of Fontaines and the Condemnation of March 7, 1277.” In Laudemus viros gloriosos: Essays in Honor of Armand Maurer, edited by Houser, R. E., 213–37. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Wippel, John F. (2016). “Metaphysical Themes in De malo, I.” In Dougherty ed. 2016, 12–33.Google Scholar
Yrjönsuuri, Mikko (2002). “Free Will and Self-Control in Peter Olivi.” In Emotions and Choice from Boethius to Descartes, edited by Lagerlund, Henrik and Yrjönsuuri, Mikko, 99–128. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Zavattero, Irene (2014). “La βούλησις nella psicologia dell’agire morale della prima metà del XIII secolo.” In Il desiderio nel medioevo, edited by Palazzo, Alessandro, 133–50. Rome: Edizioni di storia e letteratura.Google Scholar
Zavattero, Irene (2015). “Voluntas est duplex: La dottrina della volontà dell’anonimo Commento di Parigi sull’Ethica nova e vetus (1235–1240).” Medioevo 40: 65–96.Google Scholar
Zavattero, Irene (2017). “Liberum arbitrium est facultas voluntatis et rationis: Sulla definizione di libero arbitrio all’inizio del Duecento.” In Leone and Valente eds. 2017, 143–69.Google Scholar
Zavattero, Irene (2019). “Il libero arbitrio imago della libertà divina secondo Bonaventura.” In L’uomo nel pensiero di Bonaventura da Bagnoregio, edited by Zavattero, Irene. Canterano: Aracne editrice.Google Scholar