Book contents
- Free Will and the Brain
- Free Will and the Brain
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Contributors
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Conceptual issues
- Part III Mental capacities and disorders of the will
- Part IV Neural circuitry and modification of the will
- Part V Legal implications of neuroscience
- 12 Neurobiology collides with moral and criminal responsibility: the result is double vision
- 13 Neuroscience, free will, and criminal responsibility
- Index
- References
12 - Neurobiology collides with moral and criminal responsibility: the result is double vision
from Part V - Legal implications of neuroscience
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2015
Edited by
Book contents
- Free Will and the Brain
- Free Will and the Brain
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Contributors
- Part I Introduction
- Part II Conceptual issues
- Part III Mental capacities and disorders of the will
- Part IV Neural circuitry and modification of the will
- Part V Legal implications of neuroscience
- 12 Neurobiology collides with moral and criminal responsibility: the result is double vision
- 13 Neuroscience, free will, and criminal responsibility
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Free Will and the BrainNeuroscientific, Philosophical, and Legal Perspectives, pp. 231 - 250Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Aharoni, E., Vincent, G. M., Harenski, C. L., Calhoun, V. D., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Gazzaniga, M. S., and Kiehl, K. A. 2013. Neuroprediction of future rearrest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 110:6223–6228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron-Cohen, S. and Belmonte, M. K. 2005. Autism: a window onto the development of the social and the analytic brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience 28:109–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bentham, J. 1781. An Introduction to Principles of Morals and Legislation. Reprinted 1892. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Bernet, W., Vnencak-Jones, C. L., Farahany, N., and Montgomery, S. A. 2007. Bad nature, bad nurture, and testimony regarding MAOA and SLC6A4 genotyping at murder trials. Journal of Forensic Science 52:1362–1371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernhardt, B. C. and Singer, T. 2012. The neural basis of empathy. Annual Review of Neuroscience 35:1–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernhardt, B. C., Valk, S. L., Silani, G., Bird, G., Frith, U., and Singer, T. 2013. Selective disruption of sociocognitive structural brain networks in autism and alexithymia. Cerebral Cortex. July 17. Epub ahead of print.Google ScholarPubMed
Cashmore, A. 2010. The Lucretian swerve: the biological basis of human behavior and the criminal justice system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 107:4499–4505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caspi, A., McClay, J., Moffitt, T.E., Mill, J, Martin, J., et al. 2002. Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science 297:851–854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ciske, P. and Kalaska, J. F. 2010. Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. Annual Review of Neuroscience 33:269–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A. 2007. What reaching teaches: consciousness, control, and the inner zombie. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58:563–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushman, F. 2008. Crime and punishment: distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analysis in moral judgment. Cognition 108:353–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Custers, R. and Aarts, H. 2010. The unconscious will: how the pursuit of goals operates outside of conscious awareness. Science 329:47–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, L. E., Pollastri, A. R., and Smoller, J. W. 2014. Mind the gap: why many geneticists and psychological scientists have discrepant views about gene-environment interaction (GXE) research. American Psychologist 69:249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehr, E. and Gachter, S. 2002. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415:137–140CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenno, L., Yizhar, O., and Deisseroth, K. 2011. The development and application of optogenetics. Annual Review of Neuroscience 34:389–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gold, J. I. and Shadlen, M. N. 2007. The neural basis of decision making. Annual Review of Neuroscience 30:535–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glimcher, P. W. and Rustichini, A. 2004. Neuroeconomics: the consilience of brain and decision. Science 306:447–452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, J. and Cohen, J. 2004. For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. Biological Sciences 359:1775–1785.Google ScholarPubMed
Haggard, P. 2008. Human volition: towards a neuroscience of will. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9:934–946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ioannides, J. P. A., Munafo, M. R., Fusar-Poli, P., Nosek, B. A., and David, S. 2014. Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18:235–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kable, J. W. and Glimcher, P. W. 2009. The neurobiology of decision: consensus and controversy. Neuron 24: 733–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. 1972. Subjective probability: a judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology 3: 430-454. Repr. 1982 in Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. (eds.), Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koechlin, E. and Hyafil, A. 2007. Anterior prefrontal function and the limits of human decision-making. Science 318:594–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knoch, D., Schneider, F., Schunk, D., Hohmann, M., and Fehr, E. 2009. Disrupting the prefrontal cortex diminishes the human ability to build a good reputation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 20895–20899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lancaster, M. A., Renner, M., Martin, C.-A., Wenzel, D., Bicknell, L. S., et al. 2013. Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly. Nature 501:373–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Libet, B., Wright, E. W., and Gleason, C. A. 1982. Readiness potentials preceding unrestricted “spontaneous” vs. pre-planned voluntary acts. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 54:322–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCabe, K., Houser, D., Ryan, L, Smith, V., and Trouard, T. 2001. A functional imaging study of cooperation in two-person reciprocal exchange. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 98:832–835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarroll, S. A. and Hyman, S. E. 2013. Progress in the genetics of polygenic brain disorders: significant new challenges for neurobiology. Neuron 80:579–587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montague, P. R., Hyman, S. E., and Cohen, J. D. 2004. Computational roles for dopamine in behavioural control. Nature 431:760–767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moran, J. M., Young, L. L, Saxe, R.,Lee, S. M., O'Young, D., Mavros, P. L., and Gabrieli, J. D. 2011. Impaired theory of mind for moral judgment in high-functioning autism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 108:2688–2692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morse, S. J. 2006. Brain overclaim syndrome. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law. 3:397–412.Google Scholar
Morse, S. J. 2007. Voluntary control of behavior and responsibility. The American Journal of Bioethics 7:12–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Neill, P. and Petrinovich, L. 1998. A preliminary cross-cultural study of moral intuitions. Evolution and Human Behavior 19:349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pessiglione, M., Petrovic, P., Daunizeau, J., Palminteri, S., Dolan, R. J., and Frith, C. D. 2008. Subliminal instrumental conditioning demonstrated in the human brain. Neuron 59:561–567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pessiglione, M., Seymour, B., Flandin, G., Dolan, R. J., and Frith, C. D. 2006. Dopamine-dependent prediction errors underpin reward-seeking behavior in humans. Nature 442:1042–1045.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramirez, S., Liu, X., Lin, P. A., Suh, J., Pignatelli, M., Redondo, R. L., Ryan, T. J., and Tonegawa, S. 2013. Creating a false memory in the hippocampus. Science 341:387–391CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ripke, S., Neale, B. M., Corvin, A., Walters, James T. R., Farh, Kai, et al. 2014. Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci. Nature, 521:421–427.Google Scholar
Roskies, A. L. 2010. How does neuroscience affect our concept of volition? Annual Review of Neuroscience 33:109–130. 2013. Can neuroscience resolve issues about free will? In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology, Vol. IV: Free Will and Moral Responsibility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 139–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Satel, S. and Lilienfeld, S. O.. 2013. Brainwashed: The Seductive Appeal of Mindless Neuroscience. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Schultz, W., Dayan, P., and Montague, P. R. 1997. A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science 275:1593–1599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, P., Gogtay, N., and Rapoport, J. 2010. Childhood psychiatric disorders as anomalies in neurodevelopmental trajectories. Human Brain Mapping 31:917–925.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh-Manoux, A., Adler, N. E., and Marmot, M. G. 2003. Subjective social status: its determinants and its association with measures of ill-health in the Whitehall II study. Social Science & Medicine 56:1321–1333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strawson, P. F. 1962. Freedom and resentment. Proceedings of the British Academy 48: 187–211. London: Oxford University Press. Repr. 1982 in Watson, G. (ed.), Free Will. Oxford University Press, pp. 59–80.Google Scholar
Sullivan, P. F., Daly, M. J., and O'Donovan, M. 2012. Genetic architecture of psychiatric disorders: the emerging picture and its implications. Nature Reviews Genetics 13:537–551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tankus, A., Fried, I., and Shoham, S. 2013. Cognitive-motor brain–machine interfaces. Journal of Physiology Paris. Doi:pii: S0928–4257(13)00035-1. Epub ahead of print.Google ScholarPubMed
Toga, A. W. and Thompson, P. M. 2005. Genetics of brain structure and intelligence. Annual Review of Neuroscience 28:1–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, H., Yang, H., Shivalila, C. S., Dawlaty, M. M., Cheng, A. W., Zhang, F., and Jaenisch, R. 2013. One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Genome Engineering. Cell 153:910–918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wegner, D. M. and Wheatley, T. 1999. Apparent mental causation: sources of experience of will. American Psychologist 54:480–491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, S. 1987. Sanity and the metaphysics of responsibility. In Schoeman, F. (ed.), Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions: New Essays in Moral Psychology. Cambridge University Press, pp. 46–62.Google Scholar
Young, L. and Saxe, R. 2009. Innocent intentions: a correlation between forgiveness for accidental harm and neural activity. Neuropsychologia 47(10):2065–2072.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Znamenskiy, P. and Zador, A. M. (2013) Corticostriatal neurons in auditory cortex drive decisions during auditory discrimination. Nature 497:482–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed