Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:39:31.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Smoothed Analysis of Algorithms and Heuristics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2010

Daniel A. Spielman
Affiliation:
Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Yale University, New Heaven, Connecticut, USA
Shang-Hua Teng
Affiliation:
Computer Science, Boston University, and Akamai Technologies Inc, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Luis M. Pardo
Affiliation:
Universidad de Cantabria, Spain
Allan Pinkus
Affiliation:
Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa
Endre Suli
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Michael J. Todd
Affiliation:
Cornell University, New York
Get access

Summary

Abstract

In this paper, we survey some recent progress in the smoothed analysis of algorithms and heuristics in mathematical programming, combinatorial optimization, computational geometry, and scientific computing. Our focus will be more on problems and results rather than on proofs. We discuss several perturbation models used in smoothed analysis for both continuous and discrete inputs. Perhaps more importantly, we present a collection of emerging open questions as food for thought in this field.

Prelinminaries

The quality of an algorithm is often measured by its time complexity (Aho, Hopcroft & Ullman (1983) and Cormen, Leiserson, Rivest & Stein (2001)). There are other performance parameters that might be important as well, such as the amount of space used in computation, the number of bits needed to achieve a given precision (Wilkinson (1961)), the number of cache misses in a system with a memory hierarchy (Aggarwal et al. (1987), Frigo et al. (1999), and Sen et al. (2002)), the error probability of a decision algorithm (Spielman & Teng (2003a)), the number of random bits needed in a randomized algorithm (Motwani & Raghavan (1995)), the number of calls to a particular “oracle” program, and the number of iterations of an iterative algorithm (Wright (1997), Ye (1997), Nesterov & Nemirovskii (1994), and Golub & Van Loan (1989)). The quality of an approximation algorithm could be its approximation ratio (Vazirani (2001)) and the quality of an online algorithm could be its competitive ratio (Sleator & Tarjan (1985) and Borodin & El-Yaniv (1998)).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×