Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5f56664f6-6m42z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-08T07:07:46.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Regulators and terminators: the importance of biotic factors to a healthy forest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
S.A. Teale  and
J.D. Castello
Edited by
John D. Castello  and
Stephen A. Teale
S.A. Teale
Affiliation:
State University of New York
J.D. Castello
Affiliation:
State University of New York
John D. Castello
Affiliation:
State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry
Stephen A. Teale
Affiliation:
State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry
Get access

Summary

Of all the extraordinary numbers of species of insects and other arthropods, nematodes, fungi, bacteria, and viruses that exist in the world's forests, only a relatively small percentage affect trees or forests to such an extent that they are considered to be problematic. Most have beneficial or at least harmless functions in the ecosystems in which they occur. What is it about this troublesome minority of species that makes them damaging to forests? The answers to this simple question are complex, and have far-reaching ramifications in the way we view forest ecology and management.

At the broadest level, the answer begins with recognizing that native organisms living in their natural environments are only problematic when a human dimension is introduced. The human role can take many forms including (1) management practices (e.g., commodity production) that create favorable conditions for insects and disease, (2) management objectives that view natural ecological processes as undesirable (e.g., insect outbreaks or diseases that damage forest resources) even though these processes occurred in the absence of human influence, and (3) the movement of insects, pathogens and/or trees out of their native ranges into new regions or continents; and thus the creation of new and often unpredictable interspecific interactions. Absent the human dimension, forest insects and pathogens act as natural thinning agents causing the tree mortality that is needed to cull the weak competitors and release resources that are needed to support the growth of the surviving trees (see Chapter 8).

Type
Chapter
Information
Forest Health
An Integrated Perspective
 , pp. 81 - 114
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Altenkirch, W. 1991. Zyklische Fluktuationen beim Kleinen Frostspanner (Operophthera brumata L.). Allg. Forst-u. Jagdz. 162: 2–7.Google Scholar
Asaro, C. and Allen, D. C. 2001. History of a pine false webworm (Hymenoptera: Pamphiliidae) outbreak in northern New York. Canadian Journal Forest Research 31: 181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Augspurger, C. K. 1984. Seedling survival of tropical tree species: Interactions of dispersal distance, light-gaps, and pathogens. Ecology 65: 1705–1712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltensweiler, W. and Fischlin, A. 1988. The larch budmoth in the Alps In: Dynamics of Forest Insect Populations: Patterns, Causes, Implications. Berryman, A. A. (ed.). Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Berryman, A. A. 1981. Population Systems: A General Introduction. Plenum Press, New York, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berryman, A. A. 1986. Forest Insects: Principles and Practice of Population Management. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berryman, A. A. 1987. The theory and classification of outbreaks, In: Insect Outbreaks. Barbosa, P. and Schultz, J. C. (eds). Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Berryman, A. A. 1999. Principles of Population Dynamics and their Application. Stanley Thornes, Cheltenham.Google Scholar
Berryman, A. A. and Kindlmann, P. 2008. Population Systems: A General Introduction. Springer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Boone, R. D., Sollins, P., and Cromack, Jr., K. 1988. Stand and soil changes along a mountain hemlock death and regrowth sequence. Ecology 69: 714–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyce, J. S. 1961. Forest Pathology. 3rd edition. Mc-Graw-Hill Book Co., Inc. New York, USA.Google Scholar
Burdon, J. J. and Shattock, R. C. 1980. Disease in plant communities. Applied Biology 5: 145–219.Google Scholar
Byler, J. W., Marsden, M. A., and Hagle, S. K. 1990. The probability of root disease on the Lolo National Forest, Montana. Canadian Journal Forest Research 20: 987–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, S. 2008. Why large-scale afforestation efforts in China have failed to solve the desertification problem. Environmental Science & Technology 42: 1826–1831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castello, J. D., Leopold, D. J., and Smallidge, P. J. 1995. Pathogens, patterns, and processes in forest ecosystems. BioScience 45: 16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulson, R. N., Hennier, P. B., Flamm, R. O., et al. 1983. The role of lightning in the epidemiology of the southern pine beetle. Z. Ang. Entomol. 96: 182–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delb, H. 1999. Folgewirkungen der Schwammspinner-Kalamitaet 1992 bis 1995 (Lymantria dispar L.) in einem mitteleuropaeischen Eichenwaldgebiet am Beispiel des Bienwaldes in Rheinland-Pfalz. Thesis, Goettingen, Germany: University Goettingen, Faculty of Forest Sciences.Google Scholar
Dinoor, A. and Eshed, N. 1984. The role and importance of pathogens in natural plant communities. Annual Review Phytopathology 22: 443–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, A. and Crawley, M. 1994. Pathogens and the structure of plant communities. Trends Ecology & Evolution 9: 393–398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dwyer, G., Dushoff, J., and Harrell Yee, S. 2004. The combined effects of pathogens and predators on insect outbreaks. Nature 430: 341–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eichhorn, J. and Paar, U. 2000. Oak decline in Europe. Methods and results of assessments in the ICP forests. In: Recent Advances on Oak Health in Europe. Oszako, T. and Delatour, C. (eds). Forest Research Institute, Warsaw.Google Scholar
Esper, J. U.Buntgen, D. C.Frank, D.et al. 2007. 1200 years of regular outbreaks in alpine insects. Proceedings Royal Society 274: 671–679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foahom, B. 2003. Preliminary investigations on insect pest attacks in a disturbed evergreen forest of south Cameroon. International Forestry Review 6: 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grubb, P. J. 1977. The maintenance of species richness in plant communities: The importance of the regeneration niche. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc 52: 107–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haack, R. A. and Byler, J. W. 1993. Insects and pathogens: regulators of forest ecosystems. Journal Forestry 91: 32–37.Google Scholar
Hartmann, G. and Blank, R. 1998. Aktuelles Eichensterben in Niedersachsen-Ursachen und Gegenmaβbnahmen. Forst Holz. 53: 733–735.Google Scholar
Isaev, A. S., Khlebopros, R. G., Nedorezov, L. V., et al. 1984. The Dynamics of Forest Insect Populations. Nauka, Novosibirsk.Google Scholar
Keever, C. 1953. Present composition of some stands of the former oak-chestnut forest in the southern Blue Ridge Mountains. Ecology 34: 44–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kile, G. A., McDonald, G. I., and Byler, J. W. 1991. Ecology and disease in natural forests. In: Armillaria Root Disease. USDA Forest Service Agriculture Handbook No. 691. Shaw III, C. G., and Kile, G. A. (eds). USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins, CO.Google Scholar
Krause, C. 1997. The use of dendrochronological material from buildings to get information about past spruce budworm outbreaks. Canadian Journal Forest Research 27: 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H. 2008. J. Heilongjiang Vocational Inst. Ecol. Eng 21: 23–24.
Long, G. E. 1988. The larch casebearer in the intermountain northwest, In: Dynamics of Forest Insect Populations, Patterns, Causes, Implications. Berryman, A. A. (ed.). Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Lundquist, J. E. and Hamelin, R. C. (eds.) 2005. Forest Pathology – From Genes to Landscapes. APS Press, St. Paul, MN.
Lundquist, J. E. 2005. Landscape pathology: Forest pathology in the era of landscape ecology. In: Forest Pathology – From Genes to Landscapes. Lundquist, J. E. and Hamelin, R. C. (eds). APS Press, St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
Lundquist, J. E. and Beatty, J. S. 2002. A method for characterizing and mimicking forest canopy gaps caused by different disturbances. Forest Science 48: 582–594.Google Scholar
Lundquist, J. E., Goheen, E. M., and Goheen, D. J. 2002. Measuring positive, negative, and null impacts of forest disturbances: A case study using dwarf mistletoe on Douglas-fir. Environmental Management 30: 793–800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackey, H. E. and Sivec, N. 1973. The present composition of a former oak-chestnut forest in the Allegheny Mountains of western Pennsylvania. Ecology 54: 915–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maloney, P. E. and Rizzo, D. M. (2002). Pathogens and insects in a pristine forest ecosystem: The Sierra San Pedro Martir, Baja, Mexico. Canadian Journal Forest Research 32: 488–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manion, P. D. 1991. Tree Disease Concepts. Prentice-Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
Manion, P. D. and Griffin, D. H. 2001. Large landscape scale analysis of tree death in the Adirondack Park, New York. Forest Science 47: 542–549.Google Scholar
Manion, P. D. and Lachance, D. (eds). 1992. Forest Decline Concepts. APS Press, St. Paul, MN.
McCauley, K. J. and Cook, S. A. 1980. Phellinus weirii infestation of two mountain hemlock forests in the Oregon Cascades. Forest Science 26: 23–29.Google Scholar
McCormick, J. F. and Platt, R. B. 1980. Recovery of an Appalachian forest following the chestnut blight or Catherine Keever – you were right!American Midland Naturalist 104: 264–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muesel, H., Jaeger, E., and Weinert, E. 1965. Vergleichende Chorologie der zentraleuropaeischen Flora. Jena, Germany: VEB G. Fischer.Google Scholar
Otvos, I. S., Cunningham, J. C., MacLaughlan, L., et al. 1999. The development and operational use of a management system for control of the Douglas-fir tussock moth, Orgyia pseudotsugata (Lepidoptera:Lymantriidae), populations at pre-outbreak levels. In: Proceedings: Population Dynamics, Impacts, and Integrated Management of Forest Defoliating Insects. General Technical Report NE-27. McManus, M. L. and Liebhold, A. M. (eds). USDA Forest Service. Radnor, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Read, D. J. 1968. Some aspects of the relationship between shade and fungal pathogenicity in an epidemic disease in pines. New Phytologist 67: 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Root, R. B. 1973. Organization of a plant-arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: the fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecological Monographs 43: 94–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, C. G. and Kile, G. A. 1991. Armillaria Root Disease. USDA Forest Service Agriculture Handbook No. 691. USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins, CO.Google Scholar
Shea, K. 1998. Management of populations in conservation, harvesting, and control. Trends Ecology & Evolution 13: 371–375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephenson, S. L. 1986. Changes in a former chestnut-dominated forest after a half century of succession. American Midland Naturalist 116: 173–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swetnam, T. W. and Lynch, A. M. 1993. Multicentury, regional-scale patterns of western spruce budworm outbreaks. Ecological Monographs 63: 399–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, F. M., Blank, R., and Hartmann, G. 2002. Abiotic and biotic factors and their interactions as causes of oak decline in Central Europe. Forest Pathology 32: 277–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, F. M. 2008. Recent advances in cause-effect research on oak decline in Europe. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources2008 3, No 037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turchin, P., Wood, S. N., Ellner, S. P., et al. 2003. Dynamical effects of plant quality and parasitism on population cycles of larch budmoth. Ecology 84: 1207–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamp, B. J. 1991. Pathogens as agents of diversity in forested landscapes. Forestry Chronicle 67: 353–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vehviläinena, H., Koricheva, J., Ruohomäki, K.et al. 2006. Effects of tree stand species composition on insect herbivory of silver birch in boreal forests. Basic and Applied Ecology 7: 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veteli, T. O., Koricheva, J., Niemelä, P., and Kellomäki, S. 2006. Effects of forest management on the abundance of insect pests on Scots pine. Forest Ecology & Management 231: 214–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wachter, H. 2001. Untersuchungen zum Eichensterben in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Teil 2 (1951–2000). Schriftenr. Landesforstvwerw. Nordrhein-Westfalen 13. Arnsberg/Germany: Forstl. Dokumentationsstelle.Google Scholar
Weste, G. 1986. Vegetation changes associated with invasion by Phytophthora cinnamomi of defined plots in the Brisbane Ranges, Victoria, 1975–1985. Australian Journal Botany 34: 633–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmore, T. 1998. An Introduction to Tropical Rain Forests. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Williams, D. W., Lee, H. P., and Kim, I. K. 2004. Distribution and abundance of Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in natural Acer stands in South Korea. Environmental Entomologist 33: 540–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worrall, J. J. and Harrington, T. C. 1988. Etiology of canopy gaps in spruce-fir forests at Crawford Notch, New Hampshire. Canadian Journal Forest Research 18: 1463–1469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamanaka, T. and Liebhold, A. M. 2009. Mate-location failure, the Allee effect, and the establishment of invading populations. Population Ecology 51: 37–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, H. K. 2005. Review of the Asian longhorned beetle: research, biology, distribution and management in China. For. Dep. Work. Pap., FBS/6E, Food Agriculture Organization, Rome.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×