Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:50:59.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 3 - Overview of Offenders with Intellectual Disability

from Section 1 - An Overview: Definitions, Epidemiology and Policy Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2023

By
Verity Chester ,
Priyanka Tharian ,
Matthew Slinger ,
Anto Varughese  and
Regi T. Alexander
Edited by
Jane M. McCarthy ,
Regi T. Alexander  and
Eddie Chaplin
Jane M. McCarthy
Affiliation:
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust and University of Auckland
Regi T. Alexander
Affiliation:
Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust and University of Hertfordshire
Eddie Chaplin
Affiliation:
Institute of Health and Social Care, London South Bank University
Get access

Summary

This chapter provides an overview of clinical practice pertaining to offenders with intellectual disability. It covers the ‘offending journey’ of people with intellectual disability whose behaviour reaches the threshold for criminal justice system involvem’nt. This includes being accused of a crime, interactions with the police, decisions regarding prosecution and the processes involved in court cases. Though much of this account is based on the law in England and Wales, the chapter also reviews key research in this area, examining the risk factors for offending, characteristics of this population, models of treatment and treatment outcomes.

Keywords

Criminal Justice Systemtreatment modelstreatment outcomesintellectual DisabilityOffender characteristicschallenging behaviour
Type
Chapter
Information
Forensic Aspects of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
A Clinician's Guide
 , pp. 24 - 33
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Douds, F, Bantwal, A. The ‘forensicisation’ of challenging behaviour: the perils of people with learning disabilities and severe challenging behaviours being viewed as ‘forensic’ patients. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour 2011; 2(3): 110.Google Scholar
Royal College of Psychiatrists and British Psychological Society and Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists. Challenging behaviour: a unified approach (CR144). 2007. Available at: www.rcpsych.ac.uk/docs/default-source/improving-care/better-mh-policy/college-reports/college-report-cr144.pdf?sfvrsn=73e437e8_2.Google Scholar
Blackburn, R. The Psychology of Criminal Conduct. John Wiley & Sons, 1993.Google Scholar
Chester, V, Alexander, RT, Lindsay, WR. Women with intellectual disabilities and forensic involvement. In The Wiley Handbook on Offenders with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. John Wiley & Sons, 2018: 328–45.Google Scholar
Alexander, RT, Hiremath, A, Chester, V, Green, FN, Gunaratna, IJ, Hoare, S. Evaluation of treatment outcomes from a medium secure unit for people with intellectual disability. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities 2011; 5(1): 22–32.Google Scholar
Chester, V, Wells, H, Lovell, M, Melvin, C, Tromans, SJ. The prevention of offending behaviour by people with intellectual disabilities: a case for specialist childhood and adolescent early intervention. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities 2019; 13(5): 216–27.Google Scholar
Plant, A, McDermott, E, Chester, V, Alexander, RT. Substance misuse among offenders in a forensic intellectual disability service. Journal of Learning Disabilities and Offending Behaviour 2011; 2(3): 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rai, R, Tromans, S, Kapugama, C, Alexander, RT, Chester, V, Gunaratna, I, et al. A phenomenological approach to diagnosing psychosis in autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability: a case series. Advances in Autism 2018; 4(2): 39–48.Google Scholar
Winter, N, Holland, AJ, Collins, S. Factors predisposing to suspected offending by adults with self-reported learning disabilities. Psychological Medicine 1997; 27(3): 595–607.Google Scholar
Chester, V, Painter, G, Ryan, L, Popple, J, Chikodzi, K, Alexander, RT. Traumatic brain injury in a forensic intellectual disability population. Psychology, Crime and Law 2018; 24(4): 400–13.Google Scholar
Gray, NS, Fitzgerald, S, Taylor, J, MacCulloch, MJ, Snowden, RJ. Predicting future reconviction in offenders with intellectual disabilities: the predictive efficacy of VRAG, PCL-SV, and the HCR-20. Psychological Assessment 2007; 19(4): 474–9.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, S, Gray, NS, Alexander, RT, Bagshaw, R, Chesterman, P, Huckle, P, et al. Predicting institutional violence in offenders with intellectual disabilities: the predictive efficacy of the VRAG and the HCR-20. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 2013; 26(5): 384–93.Google Scholar
Holland, T, Clare, ICH, Mukhopadhyay, T. Prevalence of ‘criminal offending’ by men and women with intellectual disability and the characteristics of ‘offenders’: implications for research and service development. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2002; 46(s1): 6–20.Google Scholar
Lyall, R, Kelly, M. Specialist psychiatric beds for people with learning disability. Psychiatric Bulletin 2007; 31(8): 297–300.Google Scholar
Devapriam, J, Alexander, RT. Tiered model of learning disability forensic service provision. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour 2012; 3(4): 175–85.Google Scholar
Royal College of Psychiatrists. Forensic care pathways for adults with intellectual disability involved with the criminal justice. 2014. Available at: www.rcpsych.ac.uk/docs/default-source/members/faculties/forensic-psychiatry/forensic-fr-id-04.pdf?sfvrsn=2fdf0def_2.Google Scholar
Talbot, J. No one knows: offenders with learning disabilities and learning difficulties. International Journal of Prisoner Health 2009; 5(3): 141–52.Google Scholar
Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1985. Available at: www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/60/contents.Google Scholar
Home Office. CODE C Revised: Code of Practice for the detention, treatment and questioning of persons by police officers. 2017. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/903473/pace-code-c-2019.pdf.Google Scholar
Clare, ICH, Gudjonsson, GH. The vulnerability of suspects with intellectual disabilities during police interviews: a review and experimental study of decision-making. Mental Handicap Research 1995; 8(2): 110–28.Google Scholar
O’Mahony, BM. The emerging role of the registered intermediary with the vulnerable witness and offender: facilitating communication with the police and members of the judiciary. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 2010; 38(3): 232–7.Google Scholar
Gudjonsson, GH. The relationship of intelligence and memory to interrogative suggestibility: the importance of range effects. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 1988; 27(2): 185–7.Google Scholar
Gudjonsson, GH, Clare, ICH. The relationship between confabulation and intellectual ability, memory, interrogative suggestibility and acquiescence. Personality and Individual Differences 1995; 19(3): 333–8.Google Scholar
Boer, H, Alexander, R, Devapriam, J, Torales, J, Ng, R, Castaldelli-Maia, J, et al. Prisoner mental health care for people with intellectual disability. International Journal of Culture and Mental Health 2016; 9(4): 442–6.Google Scholar
Mckinnon, I, Thorp, J, Grubin, D. Improving the detection of detainees with suspected intellectual disability in police custody. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities 2015; 9(4): 174–85.Google Scholar
Leggett, J, Goodman, W, Dinani, S. People with learning disabilities’ experiences of being interviewed by the police. British Journal of Learning Disabilities 2007; 35(3): 168–73.Google Scholar
Department of Health. The Bradley Report: Lord Bradley’s review of people with mental health problems or learning disabilities in the criminal justice system. 2009. Available at: https://lx.iriss.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/The%20Bradley%20report.pdf.Google Scholar
Chester, V. People with intellectual and developmental disorders in the United Kingdom criminal justice system. East Asian Archives of Psychiatry 2018; 28(4): 150–8.Google Scholar
Taylor, ILA. Fitness to plead and stand trial: the impact of mild intellectual disability. Doctoral thesis, University College London, 2011.Google Scholar
Rogers, TP, Blackwood, NJ, Farnham, F, Pickup, GJ, Watts, MJ. Fitness to plead and competence to stand trial: a systematic review of the constructs and their application. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology 2008; 19: 576–96.Google Scholar
Baroff, GS, Gunn, M, Hayes, S. Legal issues. In Lindsay, WR, Taylor, JL, Sturmey, P, eds., Offenders with Developmental Disabilities. John Wiley & Sons, 2004: 37–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mental Health Act 1983. Available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1983/20/contents.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J, Chaplin, E, Hayes, S, Søndenaa, E, Chester, V, Morrissey, C, et al. Defendants with intellectual disability and autism spectrum conditions: the perspective of clinicians working across three jurisdictions. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 2021; 29(5): 698–717.Google Scholar
Criminal Justice Act 2003. Available at: www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/44/contents.Google Scholar
Archer, N, Hurley, EA. A justice system failing the autistic community. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour 2013; 4(1): 53–9.Google Scholar
Nacro. Liaison and diversion for mentally disordered offenders. 2015. Available at: www.nacro.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Liaison-and-diversion-for-mentally-disordered-offenders.pdf.Google Scholar
Department of Health & Social Care. Consultation outcome: reforming the Mental Health Act. Available at: www.gov.uk/government/consultations/reforming-the-mental-health-act.Google Scholar
Benton, C, Roy, A. The first three years of a community forensic service for people with a learning disability. British Journal of Forensic Practice 2008; 10(2): 4–12.Google Scholar
Dinani, S, Goodman, W, Swift, C, Treasure, T. Providing forensic community services for people with learning disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour 2010 Jan 1; 1(1): 58–63.Google Scholar
Lindsay, WR, Steele, L, Smith, AHW, Quinn, K, Allan, R. A community forensic intellectual disability service: twelve year follow up of referrals, analysis of referral patterns and assessment of harm reduction. Legal and Criminological Psychology 2006; 11(1): 113–30.Google Scholar
Department of Health Transforming Care: A national response to Winterbourne View Hospital Department of Health Review: Final Report. Department of Health, 2012.Google Scholar
Morrissey, C, Langdon, PE, Geach, N, Chester, V, Ferriter, M, Lindsay, WR, et al. A systematic review and synthesis of outcome domains for use within forensic services for people with intellectual disabilities. BJPsych Open 2017 Jan; 3(1): 41–56.Google Scholar
Alexander, RT, Crouch, K, Halstead, S, Piachaud, J. Long-term outcome from a medium secure service for people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 2006; 50(4): 305–15.Google Scholar
Chester, V, Tromans, S, Kapugama, C, Alexander, RT, Völlm, B. Long-stay patients with and without intellectual disability in forensic psychiatric settings: comparison of characteristics and needs. BJPsych Open 2018; 4(04): 226–34.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×