Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chronology
- Further reading
- Note on the text and translation
- List of abbreviations
- The System of Ethics
- Table of contents
- Introduction
- Part I Deduction of the principle of morality
- Part II Deduction of the reality and applicability of the principle of morality
- Part III Systematic application of the principle of morality, or ethics in the narrower sense
- Glossary
- Index
- Cambridge texts in the history of philosophy
Part III - Systematic application of the principle of morality, or ethics in the narrower sense
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chronology
- Further reading
- Note on the text and translation
- List of abbreviations
- The System of Ethics
- Table of contents
- Introduction
- Part I Deduction of the principle of morality
- Part II Deduction of the reality and applicability of the principle of morality
- Part III Systematic application of the principle of morality, or ethics in the narrower sense
- Glossary
- Index
- Cambridge texts in the history of philosophy
Summary
First section [of ethics in the proper sense of the term]: Formal conditions for the morality of our actions
The will in particular
I could turn immediately to a synthetic–systematic statement of the formal conditions for the morality of our actions. But since formal morality, or what is generally meant by “morality” [Moralität], is also called good will, and since I myself intend to characterize it in this way, I first have to provide an account of my concept of the will [iv, 158].
To be sure, everything that pertains to this elucidation has already been presented under another name; but it is still necessary to address this subject explicitly under this name [i.e., “will”], in order to indicate the connection between my presentation of the same and the way it has usually been dealt with hitherto.
An act of willing [Wollen] is an absolutely free transition from indeterminacy to determinacy, accompanied by a consciousness of this transition. This action has been sufficiently described above. – One can distinguish the objective I, which undergoes a transition from indeterminacy to determinacy, and the subjective I, which intuits itself in this transition. In willing, however, these two are united. The will [Wille] is neither the drive nor the longing nor the desiring. In the case of a drive there is a propensity and an inclination; in the case of desiring there is, in addition, consciousness of the object of the inclination, but instead of any determinacy of the active I there is only indeterminacy.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Fichte: The System of Ethics , pp. 149 - 344Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2005