Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-tx7qf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-07T16:22:00.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section 1: - General Principles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2019

Edited by
Mark D. Kilby ,
Anthony Johnson  and
Dick Oepkes
Mark D. Kilby
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Anthony Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Texas Medical School at Houston
Dick Oepkes
Affiliation:
Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Fetal Therapy
Scientific Basis and Critical Appraisal of Clinical Benefits
 , pp. 1 - 90
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Harrison, MR, Filly, RA, Golbus, MS, Berkowitz, RL, Callen, PW, Canty, TG, et al. Fetal treatment 1982. N Engl J Med. 1982; 307: 1651–2.Google Scholar
Moon-Grady, A, Baschat, A, Cass, D, et al. Fetal treatment 2017: the evolution of fetal therapy centers – a joint opinion from the International Fetal Medicine and Surgical Society (IFMSS) and the North American Fetal Therapy Network (NAFTNet). Fetal Diagn Ther. 2017; 42: 241–8.Google Scholar
Snyder, E, Baschat, A, Huisman, TAGM, Tekes, A. Value of fetal MRI in the era of fetal therapy for management of abnormalities involving the chest, abdomen, or pelvis. Am J Roentgenol. 2018; 210: 998–1009.Google Scholar
Wapner, RJ, Martin, CL, Levy, B, Ballif, BC, Eng, CM, Zachary, JM, et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 2175–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drury, S, Williams, H, Trump, N, Boustred, C, GOSGene, Lench, N, Scott, RH, Chitty, LS. Exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with sonographic abnormalities. Prenat Diagn. 2015; 35: 1010–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reddy, UM, Baschat, AA, Zlatnik, MG, Towbin, JA, Harman, CR, Weiner, CP. Detection of viral deoxyribonucleic acid in amniotic fluid: association with fetal malformation and pregnancy abnormalities. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2005; 20: 203–7.Google Scholar
Adams, LL, Gungor, S, Turan, S, Kopelman, JN, Harman, CR, Baschat, AA. When are amniotic fluid viral PCR studies indicated in prenatal diagnosis? Prenat Diagn. 2012; 32: 88–93.Google Scholar
Emery, SP, Greene, S, Hogge, WA. Fetal Therapy for Isolated Aqueductal Stenosis. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015; 38: 81–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Micu, R, Chicea, AL, Bratu, DG, Nita, P, Nemeti, G, Chicea, R. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of open spina bifida. Med Ultrason. 2018; 20: 221–7.Google Scholar
Madenci, AL, Sjogren, AR, Treadwell, MC, Ladino-Torres, MF, Drongowski, RA, Kreutzman, J, Bruch, SW, Mychaliska, GB. Another dimension to survival: predicting outcomes with fetal MRI versus prenatal ultrasound in patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 2013; 48: 1190–7.Google Scholar
Metkus, AP, Filly, RA, Stringer, MD, Harrison, MR, Adzick, NS. Sonographic predictors of survival in fetal diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 1996; 31: 148–51.Google Scholar
Jani, J, Nicolaides, KH, Keller, RL, Benachi, A, Peralta, CF, Favre, R, et al. Observed to expected lung area to head circumference ratio in the prediction of survival in fetuses with isolated diaphragmatic hernia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 30: 67–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crombleholme, TM, Coleman, B, Hedrick, H, Liechty, K, Howell, L, Flake, AW, Johnson, M, Adzick, NS. Cystic adenomatoid malformation ratio predicts outcome in prenatally diagnosed cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. J Pediatr Surg. 2002; 37: 331–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wieczorek, A, Hernandez-Robles, J, Ewing, L, Leshko, J, Luther, S, Huhta, J. Prediction of outcome of fetal congenital heart disease using a cardiovascular profile score. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 31: 284–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huhta, JC, Paul, JJ. Doppler in fetal heart failure. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 53: 915–29.Google Scholar
Kim, SA, Lee, SM, Hong, JS, Lee, J, Park, CW, Kim, BJ, et al. Ultrasonographic severity scoring of non-immune hydrops: a predictor of perinatal mortality. J Perinat Med. 2015; 43: 53–9.Google Scholar
Quintero, RA, Morales, WJ, Allen, MH, Bornick, PW, Johnson, PK, Kruger, M. Staging of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Perinatol. 1999; 19: 550–5.Google Scholar
Rychik, J, Tian, Z, Bebbington, M, Xu, F, McCann, M, Mann, S, Wilson, RD, Johnson, MP. The twin-twin transfusion syndrome: spectrum of cardiovascular abnormality and development of a cardiovascular score to assess severity of disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197: 392. e1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, AD, Border, WL, Crombleholme, TM, Michelfelder, EC. Initial fetal cardiovascular profile score predicts recipient twin outcome in twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008; 21: 1105–8.Google Scholar
O’Donoghue, K, Cartwright, E, Galea, P, Fisk, NM. Stage I twin-twin transfusion syndrome: rates of progression and regression in relation to outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 30: 958–64.Google Scholar
Oepkes, D, Seaward, PG, Vandenbussche, FP, Windrim, R, Kingdom, J, Beyene, J, Kanhai, HH, Ohlsson, A, Ryan, G, DIAMOND Study Group. Doppler ultrasonography versus amniocentesis to predict fetal anemia. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 156–64.Google Scholar
Zwiers, C, Lindenburg, ITM, Klumper, FJ, de Haas, M, Oepkes, D, Van Kamp, IL. Complications of intrauterine intravascular blood transfusion: lessons learned after 1678 procedures. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 50: 180–6.Google Scholar
Manning, FA, Harrison, MR, Rodeck, C. Catheter shunts for fetal hydronephrosis and hydrocephalus. Report of the International Fetal Surgery Registry. N Engl J Med. 1986; 315: 336–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moon-Grady, AJ, Morris, SA, Belfort, M, Chmait, R, Dangel, J, Devlieger, R, et al. International Fetal Cardiac Intervention Registry: a worldwide collaborative description and preliminary outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66: 388–99.Google ScholarPubMed
Bebbington, MW, Danzer, E, Moldenhauer, J, Khalek, N, Johnson, MP. Radiofrequency ablation vs bipolar umbilical cord coagulation in the management of complicated monochorionic pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 40: 319–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephenson, CD, Temming, LA, Pollack, R, Iannitti, DA. Microwave ablation for twin-reversed arterial perfusion sequence: a novel application of technology. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015; 38: 35–40.Google Scholar
Senat, MV, Deprest, J, Boulvain, M, Paupe, A, Winer, N, Ville, Y. Endoscopic laser surgery versus serial amnioreduction for severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 136–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quintero, RA, Reich, H, Puder, KS, Bardicef, M, Evans, MI, Cotton, DB, Romero, R: Brief re- port: umbilical-cord ligation of an acardiac twin by fetoscopy at 19 weeks of gestation. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 469–471.Google Scholar
Jani, JC, Nicolaides, KH, Gratacós, E, Valencia, CM, Doné, E, Martinez, JM, Gucciardo, L, Cruz, R, Deprest, JA. Severe diaphragmatic hernia treated by fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 34: 304–10.Google Scholar
Richter, J, Wergeland, H, DeKoninck, P, De Catte, L, Deprest, JA. Fetoscopic release of an amniotic band with risk of amputation: case report and review of the literature. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012; 31: 134–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sananes, N, Cruz-Martinez, R, Favre, R, Ordorica-Flores, R, Moog, R, Zaloszy, A, Giron, AM, Ruano, R. Two-year outcomes after diagnostic and therapeutic fetal cystoscopy for lower urinary tract obstruction. Prenat Diagn. 2016; 36: 297–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohl, T, Hering, R, Heep, A, Schaller, C, Meyer, B, Greive, C, et al. Percutaneous fetoscopic patch coverage of spina bifida aperta in the human – early clinical experience and potential. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2006; 21: 185–93.Google Scholar
Abraham, RJ, Sau, A, Maxwell, D. A review of the EXIT (Ex utero Intrapartum Treatment) procedure. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 30: 1–5.Google Scholar
Adzick, NS, Thom, EA, Spong, CY, Brock, JW 3rd, Burrows, PK, Johnson, MP, et al. A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 993–1004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cass, DL, Olutoye, OO, Ayres, NA, Moise, KJ Jr., Altman, CA, Johnson, A, Cassady, CI, Lazar, DA, Lee, TC, Lantin, MR. Defining hydrops and indications for open fetal surgery for fetuses with lung masses and vascular tumors. J Pediatr Surg. 2012; 47: 40–5.Google Scholar
Liechty, KW, Crombleholme, TM, Flake, AW, Morgan, MA, Kurth, CD, Hubbard, AM, Adzick, NS. Intrapartum airway management for giant fetal neck masses: the EXIT (ex utero intrapartum treatment) procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 177: 870–4.Google Scholar
Mychaliska, GB, Bealer, JF, Graf, JL, Rosen, MA, Adzick, NS, Harrison, MR. Operating on placental support: the ex utero intrapartum treatment procedure. J Pediatr Surg. 1997; 32: 227–30.Google Scholar
Norris, MC, Joseph, J, Leighton, BL. Anaesthesia for perinatal surgery. Am J Perinatol. 1989; 6: 39–40.Google Scholar
Slaghekke, F, Lopriore, E, Lewi, L, Middeldorp, JM, van Zwet, EW, Weingertner, AS, et al. Fetoscopic laser coagulation of the vascular equator versus selective coagulation for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014; 383: 2144–51.Google Scholar
Peeters, SH, Van Zwet, EW, Oepkes, D, Lopriore, E, Klumper, FJ, Middeldorp, JM. Learning curve for fetoscopic laser surgery using cumulative sum analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014; 93: 705–11.Google Scholar
Inglis, SR, Lysikiewicz, A, Sonnenblick, AL, Streltzoff, JL, Bussel, JB, Chervenak, FA. Advantages of larger volume, less frequent intrauterine red blood cell transfusions for maternal red cell alloimmunization. Am J Perinatol. 1996; 13: 27–33.Google Scholar
Edwards, AG, Teoh, M, Hodges, RJ, Palma-Dias, R, Cole, SA, Fung, AM, Walker, SP. Balancing Patient Access to fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome with maintaining procedural competence: are collaborative services part of the solution? Twin Res Hum Genet. 2016; 19: 276–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, KG Jr., Hess, LW, Roberts, WE, Allbert, JR, Floyd, RC, McCaul, JF, Martin, RW, Martin, JN Jr., Morrison, JC. Cordocentesis (funipuncture) by maternal-fetal fellows: the learning curve. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1991; 6: 87–92.Google Scholar
Chang, YL, Chao, AS, Chang, SD, Hsieh, PC, Wang, CN. Short-term outcomes of fetoscopic laser surgery for severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome from Taiwan single center experience: demonstration of learning curve effect on the fetal outcomes. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 51: 350–3.Google Scholar
Cohen, AR, Couto, J, Cummings, JJ, Johnson, A, Joseph, G, Kaufman, BA, et al. Position statement on fetal myelomeningocele repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 210: 107–11.Google Scholar
Belfort, MA, Whitehead, WE, Shamshirsaz, AA, Ruano, R, Cass, DL, Olutoye, OO. Fetoscopic repair of meningomyelocele. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126: 881–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Araujo Júnior, E, Tonni, G, Martins, WP, Ruano, R. Procedure-related complications and survival following Fetoscopic Endotracheal Occlusion (FETO) for severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia: systematic review and meta-analysis in the FETO Era. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2016; 27: 297–305.Google ScholarPubMed
Grushka, JR, Laberge, JM, Puligandla, P, Skarsgard, ED, Canadian Pediatric Surgery Network: effect of hospital case volume on outcome in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: the experience of the Canadian Pediatric Surgery Network. J Pediatr Surg. 2009; 44: 873–6.Google Scholar
Snoek, KG, Greenough, A, van Rosmalen, J, Capolupo, I, Schaible, T, Ali, K, Wijnen, RM, Tibboel, D. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: 10-Year evaluation of survival, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and foetoscopic endotracheal occlusion in four high-volume centres. Neonatology. 2018; 113: 63–8.Google Scholar
Sanapo, L, Moon-Grady, AJ, Donofrio, MT. Perinatal and delivery management of infants with congenital heart disease. Clin Perinatol. 2016; 43: 55–71.Google Scholar
Loh, KC, Jelin, E, Hirose, S, Feldstein, V, Goldstein, R, Lee, H. Microcystic congenital pulmonary airway malformation with hydrops fetalis: steroids vs open fetal resection. J Pediatr Surg. 2012; 47: 36–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baschat, AA, Ahn, ES, Murphy, J, Miller, JL. Fetal blood gas values during fetoscopic myelomeningocele repair performed under carbon dioxide insufflation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 52: 400–402.Google Scholar
Wulff, CB, Gerds, TA, Rode, L, Ekelund, CK, Petersen, OB, Tabor, A, Danish Fetal Medicine Study Group: risk of fetal loss associated with invasive testing following combined first-trimester screening for Down syndrome: a national cohort of 147,987 singleton pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 47: 38–44.Google Scholar
Enzensberger, C, Pulvermacher, C, Degenhardt, J, Kawacki, A, Germer, U, Gembruch, U, Krapp, M, Weichert, J, Axt-Fliedner, R. Fetal loss rate and associated risk factors after amniocentesis, chorionic villus sampling and fetal blood sampling. Ultraschall Med. 2012; 33: E75–9.Google Scholar
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Berry, SM, Stone, J, Norton, ME, Johnson, D, Berghella, V. Fetal blood sampling. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 209: 170–80.Google Scholar
Bigelow, CA, Cinelli, CM, Little, SE, Benson, CB, Frates, MC, Wilkins-Haug, LE. Percutaneous umbilical blood sampling: current trends and outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016; 200: 98–101.Google Scholar
Wilson, RD, Gagnon, A, Audibert, F, Campagnolo, C, Carroll, J, Genetics committee: prenatal diagnosis procedures and techniques to obtain a diagnostic fetal specimen or tissue: maternal and fetal risks and benefits. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015; 37: 656–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papanna, R, Block-Abraham, D, Mann, LK, Buhimschi, IA, Bebbington, M, Garcia, E, Kahlek, N, Harman, C, Johnson, A, Baschat, A, Moise, KJ Jr. Risk factors associated with preterm delivery after fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 43: 48–53.Google Scholar
Ruano, R, Sananes, N, Sangi-Haghpeykar, H, Hernandez-Ruano, S, Moog, R, Becmeur, F, Zaloszyc, A, Giron, A, Morin, B, Favre, R. Fetal intervention for severe lower urinary tract obstruction: a multicenter case-control study comparing fetal cystoscopy with vesicoamniotic shunting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 45: 452–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moon-Grady, AJ, Morris, SA, Belfort, M, Chmait, R, Dangel, J, Devlieger, R, et al. International fetal cardiac intervention registry: a worldwide collaborative description and preliminary outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66: 388–99.Google Scholar
Araujo Júnior, E, Tonni, G, Chung, M, Ruano, R, Martins, WP. Perinatal outcomes and intrauterine complications following fetal intervention for congenital heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 48: 426–33.Google Scholar
Belfort, MA, Whitehead, WE, Shamshirsaz, AA, Ruano, R, Cass, DL, Olutoye, OO. Fetoscopic repair of meningomyelocele. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126: 881–4.Google Scholar
Johnson, MP, Bennett, KA, Rand, L, Burrows, PK, Thom, EA, Howell, LJ, et al. The Management of Myelomeningocele Study: obstetrical outcomes and risk factors for obstetrical complications following prenatal surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 215: 778. e1–778. e9.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, C Jr., Payne, P, Blackmon, L, Bowen, C, Gutberlet, R. Prematurity and the obstetrician. A regional neonatal intensive care nursery is not enough. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983; 147: 125–32.Google Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Policy statement: Levels of Neonatal Care. Pediatrics. 2012; 130: 587–97.Google Scholar
Task Force for Children’s Surgical Care. Optimal resources for children’s surgical care in the United States. J Am Coll Surg. 2014; 218: 479–87.Google Scholar
Birkmeyer, JD, Stukel, TA, Siewers, AE, Goodney, PP, Wennberg, DE, Lucas, FL. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. New Engl J Med. 2003; 349: 2117–27.Google Scholar
Grayson, AD, Moore, RK, Jackson, M, Rathore, S, Sastry, S, Gray, TP, Schofield, I, Chauhan, A, Ordoubadi, FF, Prendergast, B, Stables, RH. north west quality improvement programme in cardiac interventions: multivariate prediction of major adverse cardiac events after 9914 percutaneous coronary interventions in the north west of England. Heart. 2006; 92: 658–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, JD, Herzog, TJ, Siddiq, Z, Arend, R, Neugut, AI, Burke, WM, Lewin, SN, Ananth, CV, Hershman, DL. Failure to rescue as a source of variation in hospital mortality for ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30: 3976–82.Google Scholar
Slaghekke, F, Lopriore, E, Lewi, L, Middledorp, JM, van Zwet, EW, Weingertner, AS, et al. Fetoscopic laser coagulation of the vascular equator versus selective coagulation for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014; 383: 2144–51.Google Scholar

References

Hanson, MA, Gluckman, PD. Early developmental conditioning of later health and disease: physiology or pathophysiology? Physiol Rev. 2014; 94: 1027–76.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2017). Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs). https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds).Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2018).Diabetes. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/diabetes.Google Scholar
Godfrey, KM, Barker, D J. Fetal programming and adult health. Public Health Nutr. 2001; 4: 611–24.Google Scholar
Barker, D J, Osmond, C, Forsen, T J, Kajantie, E, Eriksson, JG. Trajectories of growth among children who have coronary events as adults. New Engl J Med. 2005; 353: 1802–9.Google Scholar
Gluckman, PD, Hanson, MA, Spencer, HG, Bateson, P. Environmental influences during development and their later consequences for health and disease: implications for the interpretation of empirical studies. Proc Biol Sci. 2005; 272: 671–7.Google ScholarPubMed
Godfrey, KM. The ‘developmental origins’ hypothesis: epidemiology. In Gluckman, PD and Hanson, M, eds., Developmental Origins of Health and Disease. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 6–32.Google Scholar
Roseboom, T J, van der Meulen, JH, Osmond, C, Barker, DJ, Ravelli, AC, Schroeder-Tanka, JM, et al. Coronary heart disease after prenatal exposure to the Dutch famine, 1944-45. Heart. 2000; 84: 595–8.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Public health guideline: dietary interventions and physical activity interventions for weight management before, during and after pregnancy. London, 2010.Google Scholar
Crozier, SR, Inskip, HM, Godfrey, KM, Cooper, C, Harvey, NC, Cole, ZA, Robinson, SM, Southampton Women’s Survey Study Group: weight gain in pregnancy and childhood body composition: findings from the Southampton Women’s Survey. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010; 91: 1745–51.Google Scholar
Fraser, A, Tilling, K, Macdonald-Wallis, C, Sattar, N, Brion, MJ, Benfield, L, et al. Association of maternal weight gain in pregnancy with offspring obesity and metabolic and vascular traits in childhood. Circulation. 2010; 121: 2557–64.Google Scholar
Mamun, AA, O’Callaghan, M, Callaway, L, Williams, G, Najman, J, Lawlor, DA. Associations of gestational weight gain with offspring body mass index and blood pressure at 21 Years of age: evidence from a birth cohort study. Circulation. 2009; 199: 1720–7.Google Scholar
Forsen, T, Eriksson, JG, Tuomilehto, J, Teramo, K, Osmond, C, Barker, DJ. Mother’s weight in pregnancy and coronary heart disease in a cohort of Finnish men: follow up study. BMJ. 1997; 315: 837–40.Google Scholar
Stein, CE, Fall, CH, Kumaran, K, Osmond, C, Cox, V, Barker, DJ. Fetal growth and coronary heart disease in south India. Lancet. 1996; 348: 1269–73.Google Scholar
Poore, KR, Cleal, JK, Newman, JP, Boullin, JP, Noakes, DE, Hanson, MA, Green, LR. Nutritional challenges during development induce sex-specific changes in glucose homeostasis in the adult sheep. Am J Physiol. 2007; 292: E32–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Vickers, MH, Breier, BH, Cutfield, WS, Hofman, PL, Gluckman, PD. Fetal origins of hyperphagia, obesity, and hypertension and postnatal amplification by hypercaloric nutrition. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2000; 279: E83–7.Google Scholar
Sellayah, D, Sek, K, Anthony, FW, Watkins, AJ, Osmond, C, Fleming, TP, Hanson, MA, Cagampang, FR. Appetite regulatory mechanisms and food intake in mice are sensitive to mismatch in diets between pregnancy and postnatal periods. Brain Res. 2008; 1237: 146–52.Google Scholar
Brawley, L, Itoh, S, Torrens, C, Barker, A, Bertram, C, Poston, L, Hanson, M. Dietary protein restriction in pregnancy induces hypertension and vascular defects in rat male offspring. Pediatr Res. 2003; 54: 83–90.Google Scholar
Gopalakrishnan, GS, Gardner, DS, Rhind, SM, Rae, MT, Kyle, CE, Brooks, AN, et al. Programming of adult cardiovascular function after early maternal undernutrition in sheep. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2004; 287: R12–R20.Google Scholar
Hawkins, P, Steyn, C, McGarrigle, HH, Calder, NA, Saito, T, Stratford, LL, et al. Cardiovascular and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis development in late gestation fetal sheep and young lambs following modest maternal nutrient restriction in early gestation. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2000; 12: 443–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, P, Steyn, C, Ozaki, T, Saito, T, Noakes, DE, Hanson, MA. Effect of maternal undernutrition in early gestation on ovine fetal blood pressure and cardiovascular reflexes. Am J Physiol. 2000; 279: R340–8.Google Scholar
Langley-Evans, SC, Welham, SJ, Jackson, AA. Fetal exposure to a maternal low protein diet impairs nephrogenesis and promotes hypertension in the rat. Life Sci. 1999; 64: 965–74.Google Scholar
Cleal, JK, Poore, KR, Boullin, JP, Khan, O, Chau, R, Hambidge, O, et al. Mismatched pre- and postnatal nutrition leads to cardiovascular dysfunction and altered renal function in adulthood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 2007; 104: 9529–33.Google Scholar
Bertram, C, Khan, O, Ohri, S, Phillips, DI, Matthews, SG, Hanson, MA. Transgenerational effects of prenatal nutrient restriction on cardiovascular and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function. J Physiol. 2008; 586: 2217–29.Google Scholar
Cleal, JK, Poore, KR, Newman, JP, Noakes, DE, Hanson, MA, Green, LR. The effect of maternal undernutrition in early gestation on gestation length and fetal and postnatal growth in sheep. Pediatr Res. 2007; 62: 422–7.Google Scholar
Gardner, DS, Tingey, K, Van Bon, BW, Ozanne, SE, Wilson, V, Dandrea, J, et al. Programming of glucose-insulin metabolism in adult sheep after maternal undernutrition. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2005; 289: R947–54.Google Scholar
Hawkins, P, Hanson, MA, Matthews, SG. Maternal undernutrition in early gestation alters molecular regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in the ovine fetus. J Neuroendocrinol. 2001; 13: 855–61.Google Scholar
Poore, KR, Boullin, JP, Cleal, JK, Newman, JP, Noakes, DE, Hanson, MA, Green, LR. Sex- and age-specific effects of nutrition in early gestation and early postnatal life on hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis and sympathoadrenal function in adult sheep. J Physiol. 2010; 588: 2219–37.Google Scholar
Torrens, C, Poston, L, Hanson, MA. Transmission of raised blood pressure and endothelial dysfunction to the F2 generation induced by maternal protein restriction in the F0, in the absence of dietary challenge in the F1 generation. Br J Nutr. 2008; 100: 760–6.Google Scholar
Shasa, DR, Odhiambo, JF, Long, NM, Tuersunjiang, N, Nathanielsz, PW, Ford, SP. Multigenerational impact of maternal overnutrition/obesity in the sheep on the neonatal leptin surge in granddaughters. Int J Obes. 2015; 39: 695–701.Google Scholar
Torrens, C, Snelling, TH, Chau, R, Shanmuganathan, M, Cleal, JK, Poore, KR, et al. Effects of pre- and periconceptional undernutrition on arterial function in adult female sheep are vascular bed dependent. Exp Physiol. 2009; 94: 1024–33.Google Scholar
Gopalakrishnan, GS, Gardner, DS, Dandrea, J, Langley-Evans, SC, Pearce, S, Kurlak, LO, et al. Influence of maternal pre-pregnancy body composition and diet during early-mid pregnancy on cardiovascular function and nephron number in juvenile sheep. Br J Nutr. 2005; 94: 938–47.Google Scholar
Costello, PM, Hollis, LJ, Cripps, RL, Bearpark, N, Patel, HP, Sayer, AA, et al. Lower maternal body condition during pregnancy affects skeletal muscle structure and glut-4 protein levels but not glucose tolerance in mature adult sheep. Reprod Sci. 2013; 20: 1144–55.Google Scholar
Fainberg, HP, Sharkey, D, Sebert, S, Wilson, V, Pope, M, Budge, H, Symonds, ME. Suboptimal maternal nutrition during early fetal kidney development specifically promotes renal lipid accumulation following juvenile obesity in the offspring. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2013; 25: 728–36.Google Scholar
Nielsen, MO, Kongsted, AH, Thygesen, MP, Strathe, AB, Caddy, S, Quistorff, B, et al. Late gestation undernutrition can predispose for visceral adiposity by altering fat distribution patterns and increasing the preference for a high-fat diet in early postnatal life. Br J Nutr. 2013; 109: 2098–110.Google Scholar
Khanal, P, Johnsen, L, Axel, AM, Hansen, PW, Kongsted, AH, Lyckegaard, NB, Nielsen, MO. Long-term impacts of foetal malnutrition followed by early postnatal obesity on fat distribution pattern and metabolic adaptability in adult sheep. PLoS One. 2016; 11: e0156700.Google Scholar
Khan, I, Dekou, V, Hanson, M, Poston, L, Taylor, P. Predictive adaptive responses to maternal high-fat diet prevent endothelial dysfunction but not hypertension in adult rat offspring. Circulation. 2004; 110: 1097–102.Google Scholar
Desai, M, Byrne, CD, Meeran, K, Martenz, ND, Bloom, SR, Hales, CN. Regulation of hepatic enzymes and insulin levels in offspring of rat dams fed a reduced-protein diet. Am J Physiol. 1997; 273: G899–904.Google Scholar
Ozanne, SE, Hales, CN. Lifespan: catch-up growth and obesity in male mice. Nature. 2004; 427: 411–12.Google Scholar
Norman, JF, LeVeen, RF. Maternal atherogenic diet in swine is protective against early atherosclerosis development in offspring consuming an atherogenic diet post-natally. Atherosclerosis. 2001; 157: 41–7.Google Scholar
Halvorsen, CP, Andolf, E, Hu, J, Pilo, C, Winbladh, B, Norman, M. Discordant twin growth in utero and differences in blood pressure and endothelial function at 8 years of age. J Intern Med. 2006; 259: 155–63.Google Scholar
Jiang, BY, Godfrey, KM, Martyn, CN, Gale, CR. Birth weight and cardiac structure in children. Pediatrics. 2006; 117: E257–61.Google Scholar
Torrance, HL, Bloemen, MC, Mulder, EJ, Nikkels, PG, Derks, JB, de Vries, LS, Visser, GH. Predictors of outcome at 2 years of age after early intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obs. 2010; 36: 171–7.Google Scholar
Burrage, DM, Braddick, L, Cleal, JK, Costello, P, Noakes, DE, Hanson, MA, Green, LR. The late gestation fetal cardiovascular response to hypoglycaemia is modified by prior peri-implantation undernutrition in sheep. J Physiol. 2009; 587: 611–24.Google Scholar
Aberdeen, GW, Baschat, AA, Harman, CR, Weiner, CP, Langenberg, PW, Pepe, GJ, Albrecht, ED. Uterine and fetal blood flow indexes and fetal growth assessment after chronic estrogen suppression in the second half of baboon pregnancy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010; 298: H881–9.Google Scholar
Burrage, D, Green, LR, Moss, TJ, Sloboda, DM, Nitsos, I, Newnham, JP, Hanson, MA. The carotid bodies influence growth responses to moderate maternal undernutrition in late-gestation fetal sheep. BJOG. 2008; 115: 261–8.Google Scholar
Cleal, JK, Bagby, S, Hanson, MA, Gardiner, HM, Green, LR. The effect of late gestation foetal hypoglycaemia on cardiovascular and endocrine function in sheep. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2010; 1: 42–9.Google Scholar
Haugen, G, Hanson, M, Kiserud, T, Crozier, S, Inskip, H, Godfrey, KM. Fetal liver-sparing cardiovascular adaptations linked to mother’s slimness and diet. Circ Res. 2005; 96: 12–14.Google Scholar
Kessler, J, Rasmussen, S, Godfrey, K, Hanson, M, Kiserud, T. Longitudinal study of umbilical and portal venous blood flow to the fetal liver: low pregnancy weight gain is associated with preferential supply to the fetal left liver lobe. Pediatr Res. 2008; 63: 315–20.Google Scholar
Nishina, H, Green, LR, McGarrigle, HH, Noakes, DE, Poston, L, Hanson, MA. Effect of nutritional restriction in early pregnancy on isolated femoral artery function in mid-gestation fetal sheep. J Physiol. 2003; 553: 637–47.Google Scholar
Ozaki, T, Hawkins, P, Nishina, H, Steyn, C, Poston, L, Hanson, MA. Effects of undernutrition in early pregnancy on systemic small artery function in late-gestation fetal sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183: 1301–7.Google Scholar
Edwards, L, McMillen, I. Maternal undernutrition increases arterial blood pressure in the sheep fetus during late gestation. J Physiol. 2001; 533: 561–70.Google Scholar
Vasak, B, Koenen, SV, Koster, MP, Hukkelhoven, CW, Franx, A, Hanson, MA, Visser, GH. Human fetal growth is constrained below optimal for perinatal survival. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 45: 162–7.Google Scholar
Kiserud, T, Piaggio, G, Carroli, G, Widmer, M, Carvalho, J, Neerup Jensen, L, et al. The World Health Organization Fetal Growth Charts: A Multinational Longitudinal Study of Ultrasound Biometric Measurements and Estimated Fetal Weight. PLOS Med. 2017; 14: e1002220.Google Scholar
Oliver, MH, Hawkins, P, Harding, JE. Periconceptional undernutrition alters growth trajectory and metabolic and endocrine responses to fasting in late-gestation fetal sheep. Pediatr Res. 2005; 57: 591–8.Google Scholar
Costello, PM, Rowlerson, A, Astaman, NA, Anthony, FE, Sayer, AA, Cooper, C, Hanson, MA, Green, LR. Peri-implantation and late gestation maternal undernutrition differentially affect fetal sheep skeletal muscle development. J Physiol. 2008; 586: 2371–9.Google Scholar
Shukla, P, Ghatta, S, Dubey, N, Lemley, CO, Johnson, ML, Modgil, A, et al. Maternal nutrient restriction during pregnancy impairs an endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor-like pathway in sheep fetal coronary arteries. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2014; 307: H134–42.Google Scholar
Lie, S, Sim, SM, McMillen, IC, Williams-Wyss, O, MacLaughlin, SM, Kleemann, DO, et al. Maternal undernutrition around the time of conception and embryo number each impact on the abundance of key regulators of cardiac growth and metabolism in the fetal sheep heart. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2013; 4: 377–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, H-C, Austin, KJ, Nathanielsz, PW, Ford, SP, Nijland, MJ, Hansen, TR. Maternal nutrient restriction alters gene expression in the ovine fetal heart. J Physiol. 2004; 558: 111–21.Google Scholar
Vonnahme, KA, Hess, BW, Hansen, TR, McCormick, RJ, Rule, DC, Moss, GE, et al. Maternal undernutrition from early- to mid-gestation leads to growth retardation, cardiac ventricular hypertrophy, and increased liver weight in the fetal sheep. Biol Reprod. 2003; 69: 133–40.Google Scholar
Dong, F, Ford, SP, Fang, CX, Nijland, MJ, Nathanielsz, PW, Ren, J. Maternal nutrient restriction during early to mid gestation up-regulates cardiac insulin-like growth factor (IGF) receptors associated with enlarged ventricular size in fetal sheep. Growth Horm IGF Res. 2005; 15: 291–9.Google Scholar
Wang, J, Ma, H, Tong, C, Zhang, H, Lawlis, GB, Li, Y, et al. Overnutrition and maternal obesity in sheep pregnancy alter the JNK-IRS-1 signaling cascades and cardiac function in the fetal heart. FASEB J. 2010; 24: 2066–76.Google Scholar
Paradis, F, Wood, KM, Swanson, KC, Miller, SP, McBride, BW, Fitzsimmons, C. Maternal nutrient restriction in mid-to-late gestation influences fetal mRNA expression in muscle tissues in beef cattle. BMC Genomics. 2017; 18: 632.Google Scholar
Lie, S, Morrison, JL. Impact of periconceptional and preimplantation undernutrition on factors regulating myogenesis and protein synthesis in muscle of singleton and twin fetal sheep. Physiol Rep. 2015; 3: e12495.Google Scholar
Lie, S, Morrison, JL, Williams-Wyss, O, Suter, CM, Humphreys, DT, Ozanne, SE, et al. Periconceptional undernutrition programs changes in insulin-signaling molecules and microRNAs in skeletal muscle in singleton and twin fetal sheep. Biol Reprod. 2014; 90: 5.Google Scholar
Green, LR, Hester, RL (eds). Parental Obesity: Intergenerational Programming and Consequences. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellmuth, C, Uhl, O, Kirchberg, FF, Harder, U, Peissner, W, Koletzko, B, Nathanielsz, PW. Influence of moderate maternal nutrition restriction on the fetal baboon metabolome at 0.5 and 0.9 gestation. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2016; 26: 786–96.Google Scholar
Lie, S, Morrison, JL, Williams-Wyss, O, Ozanne, SE, Zhang, S, Walker, SK, et al. Impact of embryo number and periconceptional undernutrition on factors regulating adipogenesis, lipogenesis, and metabolism in adipose tissue in the sheep fetus. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2013; 305: E931–41.Google Scholar
Nicholas, LM, Rattanatray, L, MacLaughlin, SM, Ozanne, SE, Kleemann, DO, Walker, SK, et al. Differential effects of maternal obesity and weight loss in the periconceptional period on the epigenetic regulation of hepatic insulin-signaling pathways in the offspring. FASEB J. 2013; 27: 3786–96.Google Scholar
Poore, KR, Hollis, LJ, Murray, RJ, Warlow, A, Brewin, A, Fulford, L, et al. Differential pathways to adult metabolic dysfunction following poor nutrition at two critical developmental periods in sheep. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e90994.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, FH, Oliver, MH, Hawkins, P, Campbell, M, Phillips, DJ, Gluckman, PD, Challis, JR, Harding, JE. A periconceptional nutritional origin for noninfectious preterm birth. Science. 2003; 300: 606.Google Scholar
Pardal, R, Lopez-Barneo, J. Low glucose-sensing cells in the carotid body. Nat. Neurosci. 2002; 5: 197–8.Google Scholar
Ahokas, RA, Reynolds, SL, Anderson, GD, Lipshitz, J. Maternal organ distribution of cardiac output in the diet-restricted pregnant rat. J Nutr. 1984; 114: 2262–8.Google Scholar
Itoh, S, Brawley, L, Wheeler, T, Anthony, FW, Poston, L, Hanson, MA. Vasodilation to vascular endothelial growth factor in the uterine artery of the pregnant rat is blunted by low dietary protein intake. Pediatr Res. 2002; 51: 485–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemley, CO, Meyer, AM, Camacho, LE, Neville, TL, Newman, DJ, Caton, JS, Vonnahme, KA. Melatonin supplementation alters uteroplacental hemodynamics and fetal development in an ovine model of intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Physiol Integr Comp Physiol. 2012; 302: R454–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrens, C, Brawley, L, Anthony, FW, Dance, CS, Dunn, R, Jackson, AA, Poston, L, Hanson, MA. Folate supplementation during pregnancy improves offspring cardiovascular dysfunction induced by protein restriction. Hypertension. 2006; 47: 982–7.Google Scholar
Fleming, TP, Watkins, AJ, Velazquez, MA, Mathers, JC, Prentice, AM, Stephenson, J, et al. Origins of lifetime health around the time of conception: causes and consequences. Lancet. 2018; 391: 1842–52.Google Scholar
Lewis, RM, Cleal, JK, Hanson, MA. Review: Placenta, evolution and lifelong health. Placenta. 2012; 33 (Suppl.): S28–S32.Google Scholar
Roberts, VHJ, Lo, JO, Lewandowski, KS, Blundell, P, Grove, KL, Kroenke, CD, Sullivan, EL, Roberts, CT Jr., Frias, AE. Adverse placental perfusion and pregnancy outcomes in a new nonhuman primate model of gestational protein restriction. Reprod Sci. 2018; 25: 110–19.Google Scholar
Cleal, JK, Day, PE, Simner, CL, Barton, SJ, Mahon, PA, Inskip, HM, et al. Placental amino acid transport may be regulated by maternal vitamin D and vitamin D-binding protein: results from the Southampton Women’s Survey. Br J Nutr. 2015; 113: 1903–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sferruzzi-Perri, AN, López-Tello, J, Fowden, AL, Constancia, M. Maternal and fetal genomes interplay through phosphoinositol 3-kinase(PI3K)-p110α signaling to modify placental resource allocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016; 113: 11255–60.Google Scholar
Lewis, RM, Greenwood, SL, Cleal, JK, Crozier, SR, Verrall, L, Inskip, HM, et al. Maternal muscle mass may influence system A activity in human placenta. Placenta. 2010; 31: 418–22.Google Scholar
Sinclair, KD, Allegrucci, C, Singh, R, Gardner, DS, Sebastian, S, Bispham, J, et al. DNA methylation, insulin resistance, and blood pressure in offspring determined by maternal periconceptional B vitamin and methionine status. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 2007; 104: 19351–6.Google Scholar
Burdge, GC, Hanson, MA, Slater-Jefferies, JL, Lillycrop, KA. Epigenetic regulation of transcription: a mechanism for inducing variations in phenotype (fetal programming) by differences in nutrition during early life? Br J Nutr. 2007; 97: 1036–46.Google Scholar
Begum, G, Stevens, A, Smith, EB, Connor, K, Challis, JR, Bloomfield, F, White, A. Epigenetic changes in fetal hypothalamic energy regulating pathways are associated with maternal undernutrition and twinning. FASEB J. 2012; 26: 1694–1703.Google Scholar
Nijland, MJ, Mitsuya, K, Li, C, Ford, S, McDonald, TJ, Nathanielsz, PW, Cox, LA. Epigenetic modification of fetal baboon hepatic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase following exposure to moderately reduced nutrient availability. J Physiol. 2010; 588: 1349–59.Google Scholar
Murray, R, Bryant, J, Titcombe, P, Barton, SJ, Inskip, H, Harvey, NC, et al. DNA methylation at birth within the promoter of ANRIL predicts markers of cardiovascular risk at 9 years. Clin. Epigenetics. 2016; 8: 90.Google Scholar
Curtis, EM, Murray, R, Titcombe, P, Cook, E, Clarke-Harris, R, Costello, P, et al. Perinatal DNA methylation at CDKN2A is associated with offspring bone mass: findings from the Southampton women’s survey. J Bone Miner Res. 2017; 32: 2030–40.Google Scholar
Carr, DJ, Wallace, JM, Aitken, RP, Milne, JS, Martin, JF, Zachary, IC, Peebles, DM, David, AL. Peri- and postnatal effects of prenatal adenoviral VEGF gene therapy in growth-restricted sheep. Biol Reprod. 2016; 94: 1–12.Google Scholar
Patel, N, Godfrey, KM, Pasupathy, D, Levin, J, Flynn, AC, Hayes, L, et al. Infant adiposity following a randomised controlled trial of a behavioural intervention in obese pregnancy. Int J Obes. 2017; 41: 1018–26.Google Scholar
Kermack, AJ, Calder, PC, Houghton, FD, Godfrey, KM, Macklon, NS. A randomised controlled trial of a preconceptional dietary intervention in women undergoing IVF treatment (PREPARE trial). BMC Womens Health. 2014; 14: 130.Google Scholar
Barker, M, Dombrowski, SU, Colbourn, T, Fall, CHD, Kriznik, NM, Lawrence, WT, et al. Intervention strategies to improve nutrition and health behaviours before conception. Lancet. 2018; 391: 1853–64.Google Scholar
Woods-Townsend, K, Bagust, L, Barker, M, Christodoulou, A, Davey, H, Godfrey, K, et al. Engaging teenagers in improving their health behaviours and increasing their interest in science (Evaluation of LifeLab Southampton): study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015; 16: 372.Google Scholar

References

Schoenwolf, G, Brauer, BS, Francis-West, P. Larsen’s Human Embryology, 5th edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier, Churchill, Livingstone, 2014.Google Scholar
Viotti, M, Niu, L, Shi, S-H, Hadjantonakis, A-K. Role of the Gut Endoderm in Relaying Left-Right Patterning in Mice. PLoS Biol. 2012; 10: e1001276.Google Scholar
Fu, V, Plouffe, SW, Guan, KL. The Hippo pathway in organ development, homeostasis, and regeneration. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2017; 49: 99–107.Google Scholar
Varelas, X. The Hippo pathway effectors TAZ and YAP in development, homeostasis and disease. Development. 2014; 141: 1614–26.Google Scholar
Shukla, V, Coumoul, X, Wang, RH, Kim, HS, Deng, CX. RNA interference and inhibition of MEK-ERK signaling prevent abnormal skeletal phenotypes in a mouse model of craniosynostosis. Nat Genet. 2007; 39: 1145–50.Google Scholar
Twigg, SR, Wilkie, AO. A Genetic-Pathophysiological Framework for Craniosynostosis. Am J Hum Genet. 2015; 97: 359–77.Google Scholar
Twigg, SR, Wilkie, AO. New insights into craniofacial malformations. Hum Mol Genet. 2015; 24: R50–9.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, S, Mikkola, ML. Ectodysplasin research—where to next? Sem Immunol. 2014; 26: 220–8.Google Scholar
Antonarakis, SE. Down syndrome and the complexity of genome dosage imbalance. Nat Rev Genet. 2017; 18: 147–63.Google Scholar
Das, I, Reeves, RH. The use of mouse models to understand and improve cognitive deficits in Down syndrome. Dis Model Mech. 2011; 4: 596–606.Google Scholar
Chambers, SM, Studer, L. Cell fate plug and play: direct reprogramming and induced pluripotency. Cell. 2011; 145: 827–30.Google Scholar
Clevers, H. Modeling Development and Disease with Organoids. Cell. 2016; 165: 1586–97.Google Scholar
Brown, J, Quadrato, G, Arlotta, P. Studying the Brain in a Dish: 3D Cell Culture Models of Human Brain Development and Disease. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2018; 129: 99–122.Google Scholar
Adli, M. The CRISPR tool kit for genome editing and beyond. Nat Commun. 2018; 9: 1911.Google Scholar
Zhang, C, Quan, R, Wang, J. Development and application of CRISPR/Cas9 technologies in genomic editing. Hum Mol Genet. 2018; 27: R79–88.Google Scholar
Takebe, T, Zhang, B, Radisic, M. Synergistic Engineering: Organoids Meet Organs-on-a-Chip. Cell Stem Cell. 2017; 21: 297–300.Google Scholar
Bier, E, De Robertis, EM. EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT. BMP gradients: A paradigm for morphogen-mediated developmental patterning. Science. 2015; 348: aaa5838.Google Scholar
White, RJ, Schilling, TF. How degrading: Cyp26s in hindbrain development. Dev Dyn. 2008; 237: 2775–90.Google Scholar
Zhou, Y, Liu, HX, Mistretta, CM. Bone morphogenetic proteins and noggin: inhibiting and inducing fungiform taste papilla development. Dev Biol. 2006; 297: 198–213.Google Scholar
Hamada, H, Tam, PP. Mechanisms of left-right asymmetry and patterning: driver, mediator and responder. F1000Prime Rep. 2014; 6: 110.Google Scholar
Chiang, C, Litingtung, Y, Lee, E, Young, KE, Corden, JL, Westphal, H, Beachy, PA. Cyclopia and defective axial patterning in mice lacking Sonic hedgehog gene function. Nature. 1996; 383: 407–13.Google Scholar
Teillet, M, Watanabe, Y, Jeffs, P, Duprez, D, Lapointe, F, Le Douarin, NM. Sonic hedgehog is required for survival of both myogenic and chondrogenic somitic lineages. Development. 1998; 125: 2019–30.Google Scholar
Tickle, C, Towers, M. Sonic Hedgehog Signaling in Limb Development. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2017; 5: 14.Google Scholar
Zhu, J, Mackem, S. John Saunders’ ZPA, Sonic hedgehog and digit identity – How does it really all work? Dev Biol. 2017; 429: 391–400.Google Scholar
Roessler, E, Muenke, M. The molecular genetics of holoprosencephaly. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2010; 154C: 52–61.Google Scholar
Al-Qattan, MM. Zone of polarizing activity regulatory sequence mutations/duplications with preaxial polydactyly and longitudinal preaxial ray deficiency in the phenotype: a review of human cases, animal models, and insights regarding the pathogenesis. Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018: 1573871.Google Scholar
Roessler, E, Hu, P, Muenke, M. Holoprosencephaly in the genomics era. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2018; 178: 165–74.Google Scholar
Petrov, K, Wierbowski, BM, Salic, A. Sending and receiving Hedgehog signals. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2017; 33: 145–68.Google Scholar
Elliott, KH, Brugmann, SA. Sending mixed signals: cilia-dependent signaling during development and disease. Dev Biol. 2019; 447: 28–41.Google Scholar
Briscoe, J, Small, S. Morphogen rules: design principles of gradient-mediated embryo patterning. Development. 2015; 142: 3996–4009.Google Scholar
Grainger, S, Willert, K. Mechanisms of Wnt signaling and control. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2018; e1422 [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
Butler, MT, Wallingford, JB. Planar cell polarity in development and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017; 18: 375–88.Google Scholar
Ulloa, F, Marti, E. Wnt won the war: antagonistic role of Wnt over Shh controls dorso-ventral patterning of the vertebrate neural tube. Dev Dyn. 2010; 239: 69–76.Google Scholar
Cairns, DM, Sato, ME, Lee, PG, Lassar, AB, Zeng, L. A gradient of Shh establishes mutually repressing somitic cell fates induced by Nkx3.2 and Pax3. Dev Biol. 2008; 323: 152–165.Google Scholar
Copp, AJ, Adzick, NS, Chitty, LS, Fletcher, JM, Holmbeck, GN, Shaw, GM. Spina bifida. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015; 1: 15007.Google Scholar
Yang, Y. Wnt signaling in development and disease. Cell Biosci. 2012; 2: 14.Google Scholar
Al-Qattan, MM. WNT pathways and upper limb anomalies. J Hand Surg Eur. 2011; 36: 9–22.Google Scholar
Weiss, A, Attisano, L. The TGFbeta superfamily signaling pathway. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2013; 2: 47–63.Google Scholar
Zinski, J, Tajer, B, Mullins, MC. TGF-beta Family Signaling in Early Vertebrate Development. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2018; 10: pii: a033274.Google Scholar
Pla, P, Monsoro-Burq, AH. The Neural Border: Induction, Specification and Maturation of the territory that generates Neural Crest cells. Dev Biol. 2018; 444 (Suppl. 1): S36–46.Google Scholar
Dahn, RD, Fallon, JF. Interdigital regulation of digit identity and homeotic transformation by modulated BMP signaling. Science. 2000; 289: 438–41.Google Scholar
Kahata, K, Dadras, MS, Moustakas, A. TGF-beta Family Signaling in Epithelial Differentiation and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2018; 10: pii: a022194.Google Scholar
Wu, M, Chen, G, Li, YP. TGF-beta and BMP signaling in osteoblast, skeletal development, and bone formation, homeostasis and disease. Bone Res. 2016; 4: 16009.Google Scholar
Stricker, S, Mundlos, S. Mechanisms of digit formation: Human malformation syndromes tell the story. Dev Dyn. 2011; 240: 990–1004.Google Scholar
Suzuki, S, Marazita, ML, Cooper, ME, Miwa, N, Hing, A, Jugessur, A, et al. Mutations in BMP4 are associated with subepithelial, microform, and overt cleft lip. Am J Hum Genet. 2009; 84: 406–11.Google Scholar
Josso, N, Belville, C, di Clemente, N, Picard, JY. AMH and AMH receptor defects in persistent Mullerian duct syndrome. Hum Reprod Update. 2005; 11: 351–6.Google Scholar
Ornitz, DM, Itoh, N. The Fibroblast Growth Factor signaling pathway. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2015; 4: 215–66.Google Scholar
Dorey, K, Amaya, E. FGF signalling: diverse roles during early vertebrate embryogenesis. Development. 2010; 137: 3731–42.Google Scholar
Bhagavath, B, Layman, LC. The genetics of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. Semin Reprod Med. 2007; 25: 272–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ornitz, DM, Legeai-Mallet, L. Achondroplasia: Development, pathogenesis, and therapy. Dev Dyn. 2017; 246: 291–309.Google Scholar
Bray, SJ. Notch signalling in context. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016; 17: 722–35.Google Scholar
Sjoqvist, M, Andersson, ER. Do as I say, Not(ch) as I do: Lateral control of cell fate. Dev Biol. 2019; 447: 58–70.Google Scholar
Masek, J, Andersson, ER. The developmental biology of genetic Notch disorders. Development. 2017; 144: 1743–63.Google Scholar
Tossell, K, Kiecker, C, Wizenmann, A, Lang, E, Irving, C. Notch signalling stabilises boundary formation at the midbrain-hindbrain organiser. Development. 2011; 138: 3745–57.Google Scholar
Fre, S, Bardin, A, Robine, S, Louvard, D. Notch signaling in intestinal homeostasis across species: the cases of Drosophila, Zebrafish and the mouse. Exp Cell Res. 2011; 317: 2740–7.Google Scholar
Hori, K, Sen, A, Artavanis-Tsakonas, S. Notch signaling at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2013; 126: 2135–40.Google Scholar
Carrieri, FA, Dale, JK. Turn it down a notch. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2016; 4: 151.Google Scholar
Wahi, K, Bochter, MS, Cole, SE. The many roles of Notch signaling during vertebrate somitogenesis. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2016; 49: 68–75.Google Scholar
Chiang, MY, Radojcic, V, Maillard, I. Oncogenic notch signaling in T-cell and B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. Curr Opin Hematol. 2016; 23: 362–70.Google Scholar

References

Horn, R, Parker, M. Opening Pandora’s box?: ethical issues in prenatal whole genome and exome sequencing. Prenat Diagn. 2018; 38: 20–25.Google Scholar
Genomics England. 2018. 100,000 Genomes Project. https://www.genomicsengland.co.ukGoogle Scholar
Lord, J, McMullan, DJ, Eberhardt, RY, Rinck, G, Hamilton, SJ, Quinlan-Jones, E, et al. Prenatal exome sequencing analysis in fetal structural anomalies detected by ultrasonography (PAGE): a cohort study. Lancet. 2019; 393: 747–57.Google Scholar
Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme Handbook. London: Public Health England, 2018.Google Scholar
Nicolaides, KH. Nuchal translucency and other first-trimester sonographic markers of chromosomal abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191: 45–67.Google Scholar
Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine. The Combined Test. https://www.qmul.ac.uk/wolfson/services/antenatal-screening/screening-tests/combined-testGoogle Scholar
Chiu, RW, Lo, YM. Clinical applications of maternal plasma fetal DNA analysis: translating the fruits of 15 years of research. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013; 51: 197–204.Google Scholar
Gil, MM, Brik, M, Casanova, C, Martin-Alonso, R, Verdejo, M, Ramírez, E, Santacruz, B. Screening for trisomies 21 and 18 in a Spanish public hospital: from the combined test to the cell-free DNA test. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017; 30: 2476–82.Google Scholar
Vinante, V, Keller, B, Huhn, EA, Huang, D, Lapaire, O, Manegold-Brauer, G. Impact of nationwide health insurance coverage for non-invasive prenatal testing. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018; 141: 189–93.Google Scholar
Lewis, C, Hill, M, Silcock, C, Daley, R, Chitty, LS. Non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomy 21: a cross-sectional survey of service users’ views and likely uptake. BJOG. 2014; 121: 582–94.Google Scholar
Mackie, FL, Hemming, K, Allen, S, Morris, RK, Kilby, MD. The accuracy of cell-free fetal DNA-based non-invasive prenatal testing in singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis. BJOG. 2017; 124: 32–46.Google Scholar
Gil, MM, Accurti, V, Santacruz, B, Plana, MN, Nicolaides, KH. Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for aneuploidies: updated meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 50: 302–14.Google Scholar
Hui, L, Tabor, A, Walker, SP, Kilby, MD. How to safeguard competency and training in invasive prenatal diagnosis: ‘the elephant in the room’. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 47: 8–13.Google Scholar
Persson, M, Cnattingius, S, Villamor, E, Söderling, J, Pasternak, B, Stephansson, O, Neovius, M. Risk of major congenital malformations in relation to maternal overweight and obesity severity: cohort study of 1.2 million singletons. BMJ. 2017; 357: j2563.Google Scholar
Chitty, LS. Cell-free DNA testing: an aid to prenatal sonographic diagnosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 ; 28 : 453–66.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, CM, Lashwood, A, Chitty, L, Waters, JJ, Scriven, PN, Flinter, F. The future of prenatal diagnosis: rapid testing or full karyotype? An audit of chromosome abnormalities and pregnancy outcomes for women referred for Down’s Syndrome testing. BJOG. 2005; 112: 1369–75.Google Scholar
Stosic, M, Levy, B, Wapner, R. The Use of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Prenatal Diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2018; 45: 55–68.Google Scholar
Best, S, Wou, K, Vora, N, Van der Veyver, IB, Wapner, R, Chitty, LS. Promises, pitfalls and practicalities of prenatal whole exome sequencing. Prenat Diagn. 2018; 38: 10–19.Google Scholar
International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis, Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine, Perinatal Quality Foundation. Joint Position Statement from the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis (ISPD), the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM), and the Perinatal Quality Foundation (PQF) on the use of genome-wide sequencing for fetal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 2018; 38: 6–9.Google Scholar
Luthardt, FW, Keitges, E. Chromosomal Syndromes and Genetic Disease. In Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2001.Google Scholar
Nadler, HL, Gerbie, AB. Role of amniocentesis in the intrauterine detection of genetic disorders. N Engl J Med. 1970; 282: 596–9.Google Scholar
Nicolini, U, Lalatta, F, Natacci, F, Curcio, C, Bui, TH. The introduction of QF-PCR in prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies: time for reconsideration. Hum Reprod Update. 2004; 10: 541–8.Google Scholar
Ockeloen, CW, Willemsen, MH, de Munnik, S, van Bon, BW, de Leeuw, N, Verrips, A, et al. Further delineation of the KBG syndrome phenotype caused by ANKRD11 aberrations. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015; 23: 1176–85.Google Scholar
Hillman, SC, McMullan, DJ, Hall, G, Togneri, FS, James, N, Maher, EJ, et al. Use of prenatal chromosomal microarray: prospective cohort study and systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 41: 610–20.Google Scholar
Robson, SC, Chitty, LS, Morris, S, Verhoef, T, Ambler, G, Wellesley, DG, et al. Evaluation of array comparative genomic hybridisation in prenatal diagnosis of fetal anomalies: a multicentre cohort study with cost analysis and assessment of patient, health professional and commissioner preferences for array comparative genomic hybridisation. Efficacy Mech Eval. 2017; 4(1).Google Scholar
Hillman, SC, McMullan, DJ, Silcock, L, Maher, ER, Kilby, MD. How does altering the resolution of chromosomal microarray analysis in the prenatal setting affect the rates of pathological and uncertain findings? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014; 27: 649–57.Google Scholar
Wapner, RJ, Levy, B, Ballif, BC, Eng, CM, Zachary, JM, Savage, M, et al. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 2175–84.Google Scholar
Wapner, RJ, Zachary, J, Clifton, R. Change in classification of prenatal microarray analysis copy number variants over time [abstract]. Prenat Diagn. 2015; 35 (Suppl. S1): 1–26.Google Scholar
Xia, Y, Yang, Y, Huang, S, Wu, Y, Li, P, Zhuang, J. Clinical application of chromosomal microarray analysis for the prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities and copy number variations in fetuses with congenital heart disease. Prenat Diagn. 2018; 38: 406–413.Google Scholar
Egloff, M, Hervé, B, Quibel, T, Jaillard, S, Le Bouar, G, Uguen, K, et al. Diagnostic yield of chromosomal microarray analysis in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency: a French multicenter retrospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 52: 715–21.Google Scholar
Richards, S, Aziz, N, Bale, S, Bick, D, Das, S, Gastier-Foster, J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015; 17: 405–24.Google Scholar
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). The use of chromosomal microarray for prenatal diagnosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 215: B2–9.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics. Committee Opinion No. 581: the use of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 122: 1374–7.Google Scholar
Armour, CM, Dougan, SD, Brock, JA, Chari, R, Chodirker, BN, DeBie, I, et al. Practice guideline: joint CCMG-SOGC recommendations for the use of chromosomal microarray analysis for prenatal diagnosis and assessment of fetal loss in Canada. J Med Genet. 2018; 55: 215–221.Google Scholar
Gardiner, C, Wellesley, D, Kilby, MD, Bronwyn, K, on behalf of the Joint Committee on Genomics in Medicine (2015). G144: Recommendations for the use of chromosome microarray in pregnancy. https://www.rcpath.org/uploads/assets/uploaded/bdde58eb-4852-4ce8-95f6325a71c3d550.pdfGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y, Muzny, DM, Reid, JG, Bainbridge, MN, Willis, A, Ward, PA, et al. Clinical whole-exome sequencing for the diagnosis of Mendelian disorders. N Eng J Med. 2013; 369: 1502–12.Google Scholar
Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study. Large-scale discovery of novel genetic causes of developmental disorders. Nature. 2015; 519: 223–8.Google Scholar
Ku, CS, Naidoo, N, Pawitan, Y. Revisiting Mendelian disorders through exome sequencing. Hum Genet. 2011; 129: 351–70.Google Scholar
Chandler, N, Best, S, Hayward, J, Faravelli, F, Mansour, S, Kivuva, E, et al. Rapid prenatal diagnosis using targeted exome sequencing: a cohort study to assess feasibility and potential impact on prenatal counseling and pregnancy management. Genet Med. 2018; 20: 1430–7.Google Scholar
Quinlan-Jones, E, Lord, J, Williams, D, Hamilton, S, Marton, T, Eberhardt, RY, et al. Molecular autopsy by trio exome sequencing (ES) and postmortem examination in fetuses and neonates with prenatally identified structural anomalies. Genet Med. 2018; 21: 1065–73.Google Scholar
Carss, KJ, Hillman, SC, Parthiban, V, McMullan, DJ, Maher, ER, Kilby, MD, Hurles, ME. Exome sequencing improves genetic diagnosis of structural fetal abnormalities revealed by ultrasound. Hum Mol Genet. 2014; 23: 3269–77.Google Scholar
Talkowski, ME, Ordulu, Z, Pillalamarri, V, Benson, CB, Blumenthal, I, Connolly, S, et al. Clinical diagnosis by whole-genome sequencing of a prenatal sample. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 2226–32.Google Scholar
Bodian, DL, Klein, E, Iyer, RK, Wong, WS, Kothiyal, P, Stauffer, D, et al. Utility of whole-genome sequencing for detection of newborn screening disorders in a population cohort of 1,696 neonates. Genet Med. 2016; 18: 221–30.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists Committee on Genetics. Committee Opinion No. 581: the use of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 122: 1374–7Google Scholar
Joint Committee on Medical Genetics (2011). Consent and confidentiality in clinical genetic practice: Guidance on genetic testing and sharing genetic information. https://www.bsgm.org.uk/media/678746/consent_and_confidentiality_2011.pdfGoogle Scholar

References

Lawn, JE, Blencowe, H, Waiswa, P, Amouzou, A, Mathers, C, Hogan, D, The Lancet Ending Preventable Stillbirths series study group. Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030. Lancet. 2016; 387: 587–603.Google Scholar
Flenady, V, Wojcieszek, AM, Middleton, P, Ellwood, D, Erwich, JJ, Coory, M, et al. Stillbirths: recall to action in high-income countries. Lancet. 2016; 387: 691–702.Google Scholar
Draper, E, Kurinczuk, JJ, Kenyon, S (eds.), on behalf of MBRRACE-UK. MBRRACE-UK 2017 Perinatal Confidential Enquiry: Term, Singleton, Intrapartum Stillbirth and Intrapartum-Related Neonatal Death. The Infant Mortality and Morbidity Studies. Leicester: Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 2017.Google Scholar
Draper, ES KJ, Kenyon, S. (eds.), on behalf of MBRRACE-UK. MBRRACE-UK Perinatal Confidential Enquiry: Term, Singleton, Normally Formed, Antepartum Stillbirth. The Infant Mortality and Morbidity Studies. Leicester: Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 2015.Google Scholar
Flenady, V, Koopmans, L, Middleton, P, Frøen, JF, Smith, GC, Gibbons, K, et al. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2011; 377: 1331–40.Google Scholar
Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network Writing Group. Association between stillbirth and risk factors known at pregnancy confirmation. JAMA. 2011; 306: 2469–79.Google Scholar
Maternal and Child Health Consortium. (2001). Confidential Enquiry Into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy: 8th Annual Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy (CESDI).Google Scholar
Geenes, V, Chappell, LC, Seed, PT, Steer, PJ, Knight, M, Williamson, C. Association of severe intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with adverse pregnancy outcomes: a prospective population-based case-control study. Hepatology. 2014; 59: 1482–91.Google Scholar
Herrera, CA, Manuck, TA, Stoddard, GJ, Varner, MW, Esplin, S, Clark, EAS, et al. Perinatal outcomes associated with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018; 31: 1913–20.Google Scholar
Ovadia, C, Seed, PT, Sklavounos, A, Geenes, V, Di Ilio, C, Chambers, J, et al. Association of adverse perinatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with biochemical markers: results of aggregate and individual patient data meta-analyses. Lancet. 2019; 393: 899–909.Google Scholar
Williamson, C, Gorelik, J, Eaton, BM, Lab, M, de Swiet, M, Korchev, Y. The bile acid taurocholate impairs rat cardiomyocyte function: a proposed mechanism for intra-uterine fetal death in obstetric cholestasis. Clin Sci. 2001; 100: 363–9.Google Scholar
Geenes, VL, Lim, YH, Bowman, N, Tailor, H, Dixon, PH, Chambers, J, et al. A placental phenotype for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Placenta. 2011; 32: 1026–32.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Green Top Guidelines 55: Late Intrauterine Fetal Death and Stillbirth, 1st edn. London: RCOG, 2010.Google Scholar
Chappell, LC, Gurung, V, Seed, PT, Chambers, J, Williamson, C, Thornton, JG. Ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo, and early term delivery versus expectant management, in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: semifactorial randomised clinical trial. BMJ. 2012; 344: e3799.Google Scholar
Grand’Maison, S, Durand, M, Mahone, M. The effects of ursodeoxycholic acid treatment for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy on maternal and fetal outcomes: A meta-analysis including non-randomized studies. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014; 36: 632–41.Google Scholar
Kohari, KS, Carroll, R, Capogna, S, Ditchik, A, Fox, NS, Ferrara, LA. Outcome after implementation of a modern management strategy for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017; 30: 1342–6.Google Scholar
Mathers, CD, Loncar, D. Projections of global mortality and burden of disease from 2002 to 2030. PLoS Medicine. 2006; 3: e442.Google Scholar
Egan, AM, Hod, M, Mahmood, T, Dunne, FP. Perspectives on diagnostic strategies for hyperglycaemia in pregnancy – dealing with the barriers and challenges: Europe. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018; 145: 67–72.Google Scholar
Martis, R, Brown, J, Alsweiler, J, Crawford, TJ, Crowther, CA. Different intensities of glycaemic control for women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 4: Cd011624.Google Scholar
McCurdy, CE, Friedman, JE. Mechanisms Underlying Insulin Resistance in Human Pregnancy and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. In Kim, C and Ferrara, A, eds., Gestational Diabetes During and After Pregnancy. London: Springer London, 2010, pp. 125–38.Google Scholar
The HAPO study cooperative research group. hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358: 1991–2002.Google Scholar
Schaefer-Graf, U, Napoli, A, Nolan, CJ. Diabetes in pregnancy: a new decade of challenges ahead. Diabetologia. 2018; 61: 1012–21.Google Scholar
Macintosh, MC, Fleming, KM, Bailey, JA, Doyle, P, Modder, J, Acolet, D, et al. Perinatal mortality and congenital anomalies in babies of women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland: Population based study. BMJ. 2006; 333: 177.Google Scholar
Baptiste-Roberts, K, Nicholson, WK, Wang, NY, Brancati, FL. Gestational diabetes and subsequent growth patterns of offspring: the National Collaborative Perinatal Project. Matern Child Health J. 2012; 16: 125–32.Google Scholar
West, NA, Crume, TL, Maligie, MA, Dabelea, D. Cardiovascular risk factors in children exposed to maternal diabetes in utero. Diabetologia. 2011; 54: 504–7.Google Scholar
Philipps, LH, Santhakumaran, S, Gale, C, Prior, E, Logan, KM, Hyde, MJ, Modi, N. The diabetic pregnancy and offspring BMI in childhood: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2011; 54: 1957–66.Google Scholar
Bellamy, L, Casas, JP, Hingorani, AD, Williams, D. Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2009; 373: 1773–9.Google Scholar
Wahabi, HA, Alzeidan, RA, Esmaeil, SA. Pre-pregnancy care for women with pre-gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12: 792.Google Scholar
Scheffler, RM, Feuchtbaum, LB, Phibbs, CS. Prevention: the cost-effectiveness of the California Diabetes and Pregnancy Program. Am J Public Health. 1992; 82: 168–75.Google Scholar
Nankervis, A, McIntyre, HD, Moses, R, Ross, GP, Callaway, L, Porter, C, et al. (2013). Australasian Diabetes In Pregnancy Society (ADIPS) Consensus Guidelines for the Testing and Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Australia. http://www.adips.org/downloads/ADIPSConsensusGuidelinesGDM-03.05.13VersionACCEPTEDFINAL.pdfGoogle Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2015). Diabetes in pregnancy: management from preconception to the postnatal period. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng3/resources/diabetes-in-pregnancy-management-from-preconception-to-the-postnatal-period-51038446021Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 131: e49–64.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health. Screening, Diagnosis and Management of Gestational Diabetes in New Zealand: A Clinical Practice Guideline. Wellington: Ministry of Health, 2014.Google Scholar
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Healthcare Improvement Scotland (2017). Management of Diabetes: A National Clinical Guideline. https://www.sign.ac.uk/assets/sign116.pdfGoogle Scholar
Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee, Thompson, D, Berger, H, Feig, D, Gagnon, R, Kader, T, et al. Diabetes and pregnancy. Can J Diabetes. 2013; 37: S168–83.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Diagnostic Criteria and Classification of Hyperglycaemia First Detected in Pregnancy. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2013.Google Scholar
Nankervis, A, Conn, J. Gestational diabetes mellitus: negotiating the confusion. Aust Fam Physician. 2013; 42: 528–31.Google Scholar
Prutsky, GJ, Domecq, JP, Wang, Z, Carranza Leon, BG, Elraiyah, T, Nabhan, M, et al. Glucose targets in pregnant women with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013; 98: 4319–24.Google Scholar
American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2013. Diabetes Care. 2013; 36 (Suppl. 1): S11–66.Google Scholar
Stacey, T, Tennant, P, McCowan, L, Mitchell, EA, Budd, J, Li, M, et al. Gestational diabetes and the risk of late stillbirth: a case-control study from England, UK. BJOG. 2019; 126: 973–82.Google Scholar
Metzger, BE, Buchanan, TA, Coustan, DR, de Leiva, A, Dunger, DB, Hadden, DR, et al. Summary and recommendations of the Fifth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2007; 30 (Suppl. 2): S251–60.Google Scholar
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Management of Diabetes. A National Clinical Guideline. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, 2010.Google Scholar
National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health (UK). Diabetes in Pregnancy: Management of Diabetes and Its Complications from Preconception to the Postnatal Period. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2008.Google Scholar
Brown, J, Alwan, NA, West, J, Brown, S, McKinlay, CJ, Farrar, D, Crowther, CA. Lifestyle interventions for the treatment of women with gestational diabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 5: Cd011970.Google Scholar
NHS (2016). National Pregnancy in Diabetes Audit Report, 2015 England, Wales and the Isle of Man. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/national-pregnancy-in-diabetes-audit/national-pregnancy-in-diabetes-audit-report-2015.Google Scholar
Flenady, V, Middleton, P, Smith, GC, Duke, W, Erwich, JJ, Khong, TY, et al. Stillbirths: The way forward in high-income countries. Lancet. 2011; 377: 1703–17.Google Scholar
Nijkamp, JW, Korteweg, FJ, Holm, JP, Timmer, A, Erwich, JJHM, van Pampus, MG. Subsequent pregnancy outcome after previous foetal death. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013; 166: 37–42.Google Scholar
Monari, F, Pedrielli, G, Vergani, P, Pozzi, E, Mecacci, F, Serena, C, et al. Adverse perinatal outcome in subsequent pregnancy after stillbirth by placental vascular disorders. PLOS One. 2016; 11: e0155761.Google Scholar
Derricott, H, Jones, RL, Heazell, AE. Investigating the association of villitis of unknown etiology with stillbirth and fetal growth restriction – a systematic review. Placenta. 2013; 34: 856–62.Google Scholar
Contro, E, deSouza, R, Bhide, A. Chronic intervillositis of the placenta: a systematic review. Placenta. 2010; 31: 1106–10.Google Scholar
Wojcieszek, AM, Shepherd, E, Middleton, P, Lassi, ZS, Wilson, T, Murphy, MM, et al. Care prior to and during subsequent pregnancies following stillbirth for improving outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 5: CD012203.Google Scholar
Mills, TA, Ricklesford, C, Cooke, A, Heazell, AE, Whitworth, M, Lavender, T. Parents’ experiences and expectations of care in pregnancy after stillbirth or neonatal death: a metasynthesis. BJOG. 2014; 121: 943–50.Google Scholar
Bujold, E, Roberge, S, Nicolaides, KH. Low-dose aspirin for prevention of adverse outcomes related to abnormal placentation. Prenat Diagn. 2014; 34: 642–8.Google Scholar
Rolnik, DL, Wright, D, Poon, LC, O’Gorman, N, Syngelaki, A, de Paco Matallana, C, et al. Aspirin versus placebo in pregnancies at high risk for preterm preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377: 613–22.Google Scholar
Mekinian, A, Costedoat-Chalumeau, N, Masseau, A, Botta, A, Chudzinski, A, Theulin, A, et al. Chronic histiocytic intervillositis: outcome, associated diseases and treatment in a multicenter prospective study. Autoimmunity. 2015; 48: 40–5.Google Scholar
Grivell, RM, Alfirevic, Z, Gyte, GM, Devane, D. Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 9: Cd007863.Google Scholar
Stock, SJ, Ferguson, E, Duffy, A, Ford, I, Chalmers, J, Norman, JE. Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study. BMJ. 2012; 344: e2838.Google Scholar
Hilder, L, Costeloe, K, Thilaganathan, B. Prolonged pregnancy: evaluating gestation-specific risks of fetal and infant mortality. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998; 105: 169–73.Google Scholar
Olesen, AW, Westergaard, JG, Olsen, J. Perinatal and maternal complications related to postterm delivery: a national register-based study, 1978-1993. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 189: 222–7.Google Scholar
Jones, CJ, Fox, H. Ultrastructure of the placenta in prolonged pregnancy. J Pathol. 1978; 126: 173–9.Google Scholar
Smith, SC, Baker, PN. Placental apoptosis is increased in post-term pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999; 106: 861–2.Google Scholar
Middleton, P, Shepherd, E, Crowther, CA. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 5: Cd004945.Google Scholar
Zizzo, AR, Kirkegaard, I, Pinborg, A, Ulbjerg, N. Decline in stillbirths and perinatal mortality after implementation of a more aggressive induction policy in post-date pregnancies: a nationwide register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017; 96: 862–7.Google Scholar
Yudkin, PL, Wood, L, Redman, CW. Risk of unexplained stillbirth at different gestational ages. Lancet. 1987; 1: 1192–4.Google Scholar
Lean, SC, Derricott, H, Jones, RL, Heazell, AEP. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017; 12: e0186287.Google Scholar
Lean, SC, Heazell, AEP, Dilworth, MR, Mills, TA, Jones, RL. Placental dysfunction underlies increased risk of fetal growth restriction and stillbirth in advanced maternal age women. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 9677.Google Scholar
Knight, HE, Cromwell, DA, Gurol-Urganci, I, Harron, K, van der Meulen, JH, Smith, GCS. Perinatal mortality associated with induction of labour versus expectant management in nulliparous women aged 35 years or over: An English national cohort study. PLoS Medicine. 2017; 14: e1002425.Google Scholar
Walker, KF, Bugg, GJ, Macpherson, M, McCormick, C, Grace, N, Wildsmith, C, et al. Randomized Trial of Labor Induction in Women 35 Years of Age or Older. N Engl J Med. 2016; 374: 813–22.Google Scholar
Crump, C, Sundquist, K, Winkleby, MA, Sundquist, J. Early-term birth (37-38 weeks) and mortality in young adulthood. Epidemiology (Cambridge, MA). 2013; 24: 270–6.Google Scholar
Spong, CY, Mercer, BM, D’Alton, M, Kilpatrick, S, Blackwell, S, Saade, G. Timing of indicated late-preterm and early-term birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118: 323–33.Google Scholar
Chan, E, Leong, P, Malouf, R, Quigley, MA. Long-term cognitive and school outcomes of late-preterm and early-term births: a systematic review. Child Care Health Dev. 2016; 42: 297–312.Google Scholar
Bentley, JP, Roberts, CL, Bowen, JR, Martin, AJ, Morris, JM, Nassar, N. Planned birth before 39 weeks and child development: A population-based study. Pediatrics. 2016; 138: e20162002.Google Scholar
Frøen, JF, Tveit, JV, Saastad, E, Bordahl, PE, Stray-Pedersen, B, Heazell, AE, et al. Management of decreased fetal movements. Semin Perinatol. 2008; 32: 307–11.Google Scholar
Warrander, LK, Batra, G, Bernatavicius, G, Greenwood, SL, Dutton, P, Jones, RL, et al. Maternal perception of reduced fetal movements is associated with altered placental structure and function. PloS One. 2012; 7: e34851.Google Scholar
Saastad, E, Winje, BA, Israel, P, Froen, JF. Fetal movement counting – maternal concern and experiences: A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Birth. 2012; 39: 10–20.Google Scholar
Frøen, JF. A kick from within – fetal movement counting and the cancelled progress in antenatal care. J Perinat Med. 2004; 32: 13–24.Google Scholar
Sergent, F, Lefevre, A, Verspyck, E, Marpeau, L. Decreased fetal movements in the third trimester: What to do? Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2005; 33: 861–9.Google Scholar
Tveit, JVH, Saastad, E, Stray-Pedersen, B, Børdahl, PE, Flenady, V, Fretts, R, Frøen, JF. Reduction of late stillbirth with the introduction of fetal movement information and guidelines – a clinical quality improvement. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009; 9: 32.Google Scholar
Flenady, V, MacPhail, J, Gardener, G, Chadha, Y, Mahomed, K, Heazell, A, et al. Detection and management of decreased fetal movements in Australia and New Zealand: A survey of obstetric practice. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009; 49: 358–63.Google Scholar
Heazell, AE, Green, M, Wright, C, Flenady, V, Froen, JF. Midwives’ and obstetricians’ knowledge and management of women presenting with decreased fetal movements. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008; 87: 331–9.Google Scholar
Gardener, G, Daly, L, Bowring, V, Burton, G, Chadha, Y, Ellwood, D, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Care of Women with Decreased Fetal Movements. Brisbane: Centre of Research Excellence in Stillbirth, 2017.Google Scholar
Department of Health. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Pregnancy Care. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health, 2018.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynacologists (2011). Green-top guideline 57: Reduced fetal Movement. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg57/Google Scholar
International Stillbirth Alliance (2017). Position Statement: Fetal Movement Monitoring, Version 2. http://stillbirthalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/ISA_DFM_Position_Statement_Final-V2-June-2017.pdfGoogle Scholar
Flenady, V. Making Stillbirths Visible and Moving to Action (Invited Speaker). 2018 International Conference on Stillbirths, SIDS and Baby Survival. Glasgow, 2018. Abstract available at https://ispid-isa.org/2018/PublishingImages/abstract-information/abstract-e-book/ISPID2018ebook.pdfGoogle Scholar
McArdle, A, Flenady, V, Toohill, J, Gamble, J, Creedy, D. How pregnant women learn about foetal movements: sources and preferences for information. Women And Birth. 2015; 28: 54–9.Google Scholar
Birkenfeld, A, Laufer, N, Sadovsky, E. Diurnal variation of fetal activity. Obstet Gynecol. 1980; 55: 417–19.Google Scholar
Druzin, M, Foodim, J, Fox, A, Weiss, C. The effect of maternal glucose ingestion (MGI) compared to maternal water ingestion (MWI) on the non stress test (NST). In Scientific Abstracts of the Thirtieth Annual Meeting of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, March 17–20, 1983 [Abstract 59]. Washington, DC: Society for Gynecologic Investigation, 1983.Google Scholar
Esin, S, Baser, E, Cakir, C, Ustun, Tuncal GN, Kucukozkan, T. Chocolate or orange juice for non-reactive non-stress test (NST) patterns: a randomized prospective controlled study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013; 26: 915–19.Google Scholar
Tveit, JV, Saastad, E, Stray-Pedersen, B, Bordahl, PE, Flenady, V, Fretts, R, Frøen, JF. Reduction of late stillbirth with the introduction of fetal movement information and guidelines – a clinical quality improvement. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009; 9: 32.Google Scholar
Daly, LM, Gardener, G, Bowring, V, Burton, W, Chadha, Y, Ellwood, D, et al. Care of pregnant women with decreased fetal movements: Update of a clinical practice guideline for Australia and New Zealand. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018: 58: 463–8.Google Scholar
Mangesi, L, Hofmeyr, GJ, Smith, V, Smyth, RM. Fetal movement counting for assessment of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 10: Cd004909.Google Scholar
Saastad, E, Winje, BA, Stray-Pedersen, B, Froen, JF. Fetal movement counting improved identification of fetal growth restriction and perinatal outcomes – a multi-centre, randomized, controlled trial. PloS One. 2011; 6: e28482.Google Scholar
Saastad, E, Tveit, JV, Flenady, V, Stray-Pedersen, B, Fretts, R, Bordahl, PE, Frøen, JF. Implementation of uniform information on fetal movement in a Norwegian population reduces delayed reporting of decreased fetal movement and stillbirths in primiparous women – a clinical quality improvement. BMC Res Notes. 2010; 3: 2.Google Scholar
Norman, J, Heazell, AEP, Rodriguez, A, Weir, CJ, Stock, SJE, Calderwood, CJ, et al. The AFFIRM study: Can promoting awareness of fetal movements and focusing interventions reduce fetal mortality? A stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 218: S603.Google Scholar
The Australian and New Zealand Stillbirth Alliance Research Consortium. My Baby’s Movements: A stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised controlled trial testing a mobile application intervention aimed at lowering stillbirth rates. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017; 17 (Suppl. 1): 35.Google Scholar
Eichbaum, M, Gast, AS, Sohn, C. Doppler sonography of the fetal middle cerebral artery in the management of massive fetomaternal hemorrhage. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2006; 21: 334–8.Google Scholar
Samadi, R, Greenspoon, JS, Gviazda, I, Settlage, RH, Goodwin, TM. Massive fetomaternal hemorrhage and fetal death: are they predictable? J Perinatol. 1999; 19: 227–9.Google Scholar
Wylie, BJ, D’Alton, ME. Fetomaternal hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 115: 1039–51.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, O, Stephen, G, Martindale, E, Heazell, AE. Predicting poor perinatal outcome in women who present with decreased fetal movements. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009; 29: 705–10.Google Scholar
Scala, C, Bhide, A, Familiari, A, Pagani, G, Khalil, A, Papageorghiou, A, Thilaganathan, B. Number of episodes of reduced fetal movement at term: association with adverse perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213: 678. e1–6.Google Scholar
Warland, J, Dorrian, J, Morrison, JL, O’Brien, LM. Maternal sleep during pregnancy and poor fetal outcomes: A scoping review of the literature with meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev. 2018; 41: 197–219.Google Scholar
Stacey, T, Thompson, JMD, Mitchell, EA, Ekeroma, AJ, Zuccollo, JM, McCowan, LME. Association between maternal sleep practices and risk of late stillbirth: a case-control study. BMJ. 2011; 342: d3403.Google Scholar
Humphries, A, Mirjalili, SA, Tarr, GP, Thompson, JMD, Stone, P. The effect of supine positioning on maternal hemodynamics during late pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heazell, A, Li, M, Budd, J, Thompson, J, Stacey, T, Cronin, RS, et al. Association between maternal sleep practices and late stillbirth – findings from a stillbirth case-control study. BJOG. 2018; 125: 254–62.Google Scholar
McCowan, LME, Thompson, JMD, Cronin, RS, Li, M, Stacey, T, Stone, PR, et al. Going to sleep in the supine position is a modifiable risk factor for late pregnancy stillbirth; Findings from the New Zealand multicentre stillbirth case-control study. PloS One. 2017; 12: e0179396.Google Scholar
Tommy’s. (2017). Sleep On Side – a pregnancy campaign https://www.tommys.org/pregnancy-information/sleep-side-pregnancy-campaign.Google Scholar
Sleep on Side (2018). Sleep on side when baby’s inside. Website. https://www.sleeponside.org.nz/.Google Scholar
Tommy’s (22 June 2018). Umamanita DormirDeLado. Online video clip. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLTO1qGp_I0.Google Scholar
Zdravkovic, T, Genbacev, O, McMaster, MT, Fisher, SJ. The adverse effects of maternal smoking on the human placenta: a review. Placenta. 2005; 26 (Suppl. A): S81–6.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, C, O’Mara-Eves, A, Porter, J, Coleman, T, Perlen, SM, Thomas, J, McKenzie, JE. Psychosocial interventions for supporting women to stop smoking in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 2: CD001055.Google Scholar
Mund, M, Louwen, F, Klingelhoefer, D, Gerber, A. Smoking and pregnancy – A review on the first major environmental risk factor of the unborn. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013; 10: 6485–99.Google Scholar
Karumanchi, SA, Levine, RJ. How Does Smoking Reduce the Risk of Preeclampsia? Hypertension. 2010; 55: 1100–1.Google Scholar
Zhang, K, Wang, X. Maternal smoking and increased risk of sudden infant death syndrome: a meta-analysis. Legal Med (Tokyo, Japan). 2013; 15: 115–21.Google Scholar
Hofhuis, W, de Jongste, JC, Merkus, PJFM. Adverse health effects of prenatal and postnatal tobacco smoke exposure on children. Arch Dis Child. 2003; 88: 1086–90.Google Scholar
Khader, M, Bresgen, N, Eckl, PM. Antimutagenic effects of ethanolic extracts from selected Palestinian medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 2010; 127: 319–24.Google Scholar
Tobacco Use and Dependence Guideline Panel. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, 2008.Google Scholar
Coleman, T, Chamberlain, C, Davey, MA, Cooper, SE, Leonardi-Bee, J. Pharmacological interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 12: Cd010078.Google Scholar
Hunt, R, Davey, M, Anil, S, Kenny, S, Wills, G, Simon, D, Wallace, E. on behalf of the Perinatal Safety and Quality Committee. Victorian Perinatal Services Performance Indicators Report 2016–17. Melbourne: Safer Care Victoria, Victorian Government, 2018.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, CP, Gould, GS, Oncken, C. Management of smoking in pregnant women. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health. 2014; 43: 46–51.Google Scholar
Flenady, V, New, K, MacPhail, J. Clinical Practice Guideline Working Party on Smoking Cessation in Pregnancy. Brisbane: Centre for Clinical Studies, Mater Health Services, 2005.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2011). Smoking Cessation during Pregnancy: A Clinician’s Guide to Helping Pregnant Women Quit Smoking. https://www.acog.org/~/media/Departments/Tobacco%20Alcohol%20and%20Substance%20Abuse/SCDP.pdf.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2010). Smoking: stopping in pregnancy and after childbirth. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/PH26.Google Scholar
Widdows, K, Reid, HE, Roberts, SA, Camacho, EM, Heazell, AEP. Saving babies’ lives project impact and results evaluation (SPiRE): a mixed methodology study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018; 18: 43.Google Scholar

References

Fry, JT, Frader, J. “We want to do everything”: how parents represent their experiences with maternal–fetal surgery online. J Perinatol. 2018; 38: 226.Google Scholar
McCoyd, JLM. Critical Aspects of Decision-Making and Grieving After Diagnosis of Fetal Anomaly. In Paley Galst, J and Verp, M, eds., Prenatal and Preimplantation Diagnosis. Cham: Springer, 2015.Google Scholar
Shapiro, DE, Boggs, SR, Melamed, BG, Graham-Pole, J. The effect of varied physician affect on recall, anxiety, and perceptions in women at risk for breast cancer: an analogue study. Health Psychol. 1992; 11: 61–66.Google Scholar
Kessels, PC. Patients’ memory for medical information J R Soc Med. 2003; 96: 219–222.Google Scholar
Baron, J. Thinking and Deciding. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Marois, R, Ivanoff, J. Capacity limits of information processing in the brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005; 9: 296–305.Google Scholar
Timmermans, DRM. Bounded Rationality and Emotions. In Kattan, MW, ed., Encyclopedia of Medical Decision Making. London: Sage Publications, 2009.Google Scholar
National Literary Trust. http://www.literacytrust.org.ukGoogle Scholar
Williams, MV, Davis, T, Parker, RM, Weiss, BD. The Role of Health Literacy in Patient-Physician Communication. Fam Med. 2002; 34: 383–9.Google Scholar
Peters, E, Västfjäll, D, Slovic, P, Metz, CK, Mazzocco, K, Dickert, S. Numeracy and decision making. Psychol Sci. 2006; 17: 407–13.Google Scholar
Tiedens, LZ, Linton, S. Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001; 81: 973–88.Google Scholar
Evans, JS. Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment and Social Cognition. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008; 59: 255–78.Google Scholar
Gilovich, T, Griffin, D, Kahneman, D. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Schwartz, N, Clore, GL. Mood as information: 20 years later. Psychol Inq. 2003; 14: 296–303.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G, Lerner, JS. The Role of Affect in Decision Making. In Davidson, RJ, Scherer, KR, Goldsmith, HH. Handbook of Affective Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, M, Timmermans, DRM, Knol, D, Eijk, JTM, Smit, D, van Vugt, J, Van der Wal, G. Understanding pregnant women’s decision making concerning prenatal screening. Health Psychol. 2008; 27; 430–37.Google Scholar
Timmermans, DRM. Understanding and perception of risks about prenatal screening: interviews with pregnant women. Unpublished material.Google Scholar
Wang, XT. Emotions with reason: Resolving conflicts in risk preference. Cogn Emot. 2006; 20: 1132–52.Google Scholar
Antiel, RM, Flake, AW, Collura, CA, Johnson, MP, Rintoul, NE, Lantos, JD, et al. Weighing the Social and Ethical Considerations of Maternal-Fetal Surgery. Pediatrics. 2017; 140: e20170608.Google Scholar
Brown, SD, Feudtner, C, Truog, RD. Prenatal Decision-Making for Myelomeningocele: Can We Minimize Bias and Variability? Pediatrics. 2015; 136: 409–11.Google Scholar
Clayman, ML, Bylund, CL, Chewning, B, Makoul, G. The impact of patient participation in health decisions within medical encounters: a systematic review. Med Decis Making. 2016; 36: 427–52.Google Scholar
Elwyn, G Laitner, S, Coulter, A, Walker, E, Watson, P, Thomson, R. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. BMJ. 2010; 341: c5146.Google Scholar
Elwyn, G, Edwards, A, Britten, N. “Doing prescribing”: how doctors can be more effective. BMJ. 2003; 327: 864–7.Google Scholar
O’Connor, A, Llewellyn-Thomas, H, Stacey, D. (2005). IPDAS Collaboration Background Document. International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration. http://ipdas.ohri.ca/IPDAS_Background.pdfGoogle Scholar
Stacey, D, Légaré, F, Col, NF, Bennett, CL, Barry, MJ, Eden, KB, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 1: CD001431.Google Scholar
Blumenthal-Barby, JS, Krieger, H, Wei, A, Kim, D, Olutoye, OO, Cass, DL. Communication about maternal-fetal surgery for myelomeningocele and congenital diaphragmatic hernia: preliminary findings with implications for informed consent and shared decision-making. J Perinat Med. 2016; 44: 645–53.Google Scholar
Timmermans, DRM, Oudhoff, J. Different formats for the Communication of risks: Verbal, numerical, and graphical formats. In Cochran, JJ, ed., Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2010.Google Scholar
Timmermans, DRM. The Role of Experience and Domain of Expertise in Using Numerical and Verbal Probability Terms in Medical Decisions. Med Decis Making. 1994; 14: 146–56.Google Scholar
Wallsten, TS, Budescu, DV, Zwick, R, Kemp, SM. Preferences and reasons for communicating probabilistic information in verbal or numerical terms. Bull Psychon Soc. 1993; 31: 135–38.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G, Gassmaier, W, Kurz-Milcke, E, Schwartz, LM, Woloshin, S. Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2007; 8: 53–96.Google Scholar
Slovic, P, Monahan, J, MacGregor, DG. Violence risk assessment and risk communication: the effects of using actual cases, providing instruction, and employing probability versus frequency formats. Law Hum Behav. 2000; 24: 271–96.Google Scholar
Lipkus, IM. Numeric, Verbal, and Visual Formats of Conveying Health Risks: Suggested Best Practices and Future Recommendations. Med Decis Making. 2007; 27: 696–713.Google Scholar
Timmermans, D, Molewijk, B, Stiggelbout, A, Kievit, J. Different formats for communicating surgical risks to patients and the effect on choice of treatment. Patient Educ Couns. 2004; 54: 255–63.Google Scholar
Galesic, M, Garcia-Retamero, R, Gigerenzer, G. Using icon arrays to communicate medical risks: Overcoming low numeracy. Health Psychol. 2009; 28: 210–16.Google Scholar
Fischhoff, B, Slovic, P, Lichtenstein, S. Knowing what you want: measuring labile values. In Wallsten, TS, ed., Cognitive Processes in Choice and Decision Behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1980.Google Scholar
Montgomery, AA, Fahey, T. How do patients’ treatment preferences compare with those of clinicians? Qual Health Care. 2001; 10 (Suppl. I): i39–43.Google Scholar
Stiggelbout, AM, De Haes, JCJM. Patient Preference for Cancer Therapy: An Overview of Measurement Approaches. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19: 220–30.Google Scholar
Wilson, T. Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Robinson, A, Thomson, R. Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools. Qual Health Care. 2001; 10 (Suppl. I): i34–38.Google Scholar
Gibb, A, Entwistle, V. Shared decision making: trade-offs between narrower and broader conceptions. Health Expect. 2011; 14: 210–19.Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis, A. On making the right choice: the deliberation without attention effect. Science. 2006; 311: 1005–7.Google Scholar

References

Manson, NC, O’Neill, O. Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Faden, RR, Beauchamp, TL. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Elwyn, GA, Durand, MA, Song, J, Aarts, J, Barr, PJ, Berger, Z, et al. A three-talk model for shared-decision making: multistage consultation process. BMJ. 2017; 359: j4891.Google Scholar
Sandman, L, Munthe, C. Shared decision making, paternalism and patient choice. Health Care Anal. 2010; 18: 60–84.Google Scholar
Emanuel, EJ, Emanuel, LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA. 1992; 267: 2221–6.Google Scholar
Sheppard, MK. Vulnerability, therapeutic misconception and informed consent: is there a need for special treatment of pregnant women in fetus-regarding clinical trials? J Med Ethics. 2016; 42: 127–31.Google Scholar
Smajdor, A. Ethical challenges in fetal surgery. J Med Ethics. 2011; 37: 88–91.Google Scholar
Blizzard, D. A trying experience: fetoscopy and maternal decision making. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 48: 562–73.Google Scholar
Clarke, A. Treatments and trials for the fetal patient: imposing the burdens of enthusiasm? In Schmitz, D, Clarke, A, Dondorp, W, eds., The Fetus as a Patient: A Contested Concept and Its Normative Implications. London: Routledge, 2018. p. 117–132.Google Scholar
Lidz, CW, Appelbaum, PS. The therapeutic misconception: problems and solutions. Med Care. 2002; 40: V55–63.Google Scholar
Horng, S, Grady, C. Misunderstanding in clinical research: distinguishing therapeutic misconception, therapeutic misestimation, and therapeutic optimism. IRB. 2003; 25: 11–16.Google Scholar
Helmreich, RJ, Hundley, V, Norman, A, Ighedosa, A, Chow, E. Research in pregnant women: the challenges of informed consent. Nurs Womens Health. 2007; 11: 576–85.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Ethics, American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics. Maternal-fetal intervention and fetal care centers. Pediatrics. 2011; 128: e473–8.Google Scholar
Lyerly, AD, Little, MO, Faden, RR. A critique of the ‘fetus as patient’. Am J Bioeth. 2008; 8: 42–4; discussion W4–6.Google Scholar
Casper, MJ. The Making of the Unborn Patient. A Social Anatomy of Fetal Surgery. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Dondorp, W, De Wert, G. Ethical issues in maternal-fetal medicine. In Rodeck, CH, Whittle, MJ, eds., Fetal Medicine: Basic Science and Clinical Practice, 3rd Edition. London: Elsevier, 2019, p. 139–148.Google Scholar
McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA. Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Callahan, JC, Knight, JW. Women, fetuses, medicine, and the law. In Bequaert Holmes, H, Purdy, L, eds., Feminist Perspectives in Medical Ethics. Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1992, pp. 224–239.Google Scholar
Murray, TH. Moral obligations to the not-yet born: the fetus as patient. Clin Perinatol. 1987; 14: 329–43.Google Scholar
Savulescu, J. Future people, involuntary medical treatment in pregnancy and the duty of easy rescue. Utilitas. 2007; 19: 1–20.Google Scholar
Care for the Unborn Child. Ethical and Legal Aspects of Fetal Therapy. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands, 2009.Google Scholar
Reitsma, AM, Moreno, JD. Ethical regulations for innovative surgery: the last frontier? J Am Coll Surg. 2002; 194: 792–801.Google Scholar
Antiel, RM, Flake, AW. Responsible surgical innovation and research in maternal-fetal surgery. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017; 22: 423–7.Google Scholar
De Koning, TJ, Klomp, LW, Van Oppen, AC, Beemer, FA, Dorland, L, van den Berg, I, Berger, R. Prenatal and early postnatal treatment in 3-phosphoglycerate-dehydrogenase deficiency. Lancet. 2004; 364: 2221–2.Google Scholar
Liley, AW. The development of the idea of fetal transfusion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971; 111: 302–4.Google Scholar
Harrison, MR. The University of California at San Francisco Fetal Treatment Center: a personal perspective. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2004; 19: 513–24.Google Scholar
Lyerly, AD, Mahowald, MB. Maternal-fetal surgery: the fallacy of abstraction and the problem of equipoise. Health Care Anal. 2001; 9: 151–65.Google Scholar
Adzick, NS, Thom, EA, Spong, CY, Brock, JW 3rd, Burrows, PK, Johnson, MP, et al. A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 993–1004.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, HCML, Deprest, J, Van den Berg, PP. When referring physicians and researchers disagree on equipoise: the TOTAL trial experience. Prenatal Diag. 2011; 31: 589–94.Google Scholar
Verweij, EJ. Ethics of involving pregnant women in fetal therapy trials. In Schmitz, D, Clarke, A, Dondorp, W, eds., The Fetus as a Patient: A Contested Concept and its Normative Implications. London: Routledge, 2018, p. 133–43.Google Scholar
Deprest, J, Toelen, J, Debyser, Z, Rodrigues, C, Devlieger, R, De Catte, L, Lewi, L, Van Mieghem, T, Naulaers, G, Vandevelde, M, Claus, F, Dierickx, K. The fetal patient – ethical aspects of fetal therapy. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2011; 3: 221–7.Google Scholar
Westgren, M, Götherström, C. Stem cell transplantation before birth – a realistic option for treatment of osteogenesis imperfecta? Prenatal Diag. 2015; 35: 827–32.Google Scholar
Götherström, C, Hermerén, G, Johansson, M, Sahlin, N-E, Westgren, M. Stem cells and fetal therapy: is it a reality? Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Med. 2017; 27: 166–7.Google Scholar
Strong, C. Abortion decisions as inclusion and exclusion criteria in research involving pregnant women and fetuses. J Med Ethics. 2012; 38: 43–7.Google Scholar
Lindenburg, IT, Van Kamp, IL, Oepkes, D. Intrauterine blood transfusion: current indications and associated risks. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014; 36: 263–71.Google Scholar
Grethel, EJ, Wagner, AJ, Clifton, MS, Cortes, RA, Farmer, DL, Harrison, MR, Nobuhara, KK, Lee, H. Fetal intervention for mass lesions and hydrops improves outcome: a 15-year experience. J Pediatr Surg. 2007; 42: 117–23.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. Diagnosis and Management of Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 58: 611–31.Google Scholar
Gebb, J, Dar, P, Rosner, M, Evans, MI. Long-term neurologic outcomes after common fetal interventions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 212: e1–9.Google Scholar
Antiel, RM. Ethical challenges in the new world of maternal-fetal surgery. Semin Perinatol. 2016; 40: 227–33.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Ethics. Committee Opinion No. 664: refusal of medically recommended treatment during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 127: e175–82.Google Scholar
Critical Care Decisions in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine: Ethical Issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2006, p. 276.Google Scholar
Bianchi, DW. From prenatal genomic diagnosis to fetal personalized medicine: progress and challenges. Nat Med. 2012; 18: 1041–51.Google Scholar
Guedj, F, Bianchi, DW, Delabar, JM. Prenatal treatment of Down syndrome: a reality? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 26: 92–103.Google Scholar
De Wert, G, Dondorp, W, Bianchi, DW. Fetal therapy for Down syndrome: an ethical exploration. Prenatal Diag. 2017; 37: 1–7.Google Scholar

References

Adzick, NS. Open fetal surgery for life-threatening fetal anomalies. Sem Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010; 15: 1–8.Google Scholar
Danzer, E, Sydorak, RM, Harrison, MR, Albanese, CT. Minimal access fetal surgery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003; 108: 3–13.Google Scholar
Olutoye, OO, Olutoye, OA. EXIT procedure for fetal neck masses. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2012; 24: 386–93.Google Scholar
Adamsons, K Jr. Fetal surgery. New Engl J Med. 1966; 275: 204–6.Google Scholar
Jancelewicz, T, Harrison, MR. A history of fetal surgery. Clin Perinatol. 2009; 36: 227–36, vii.Google Scholar
Horger, EO 3rd, Hutchinson, DL. Intrauterine fetal transfusion in the treatment of erythroblastosis fetalis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1969; 103: 959–66.Google Scholar
Liley, AW. The use of amniocentesis and fetal transfusion in erythroblastosis fetalis. Pediatrics. 1965; 35: 836–47.Google Scholar
Moise, KJ Jr. The history of fetal therapy. Am J Perinatol. 2014; 31: 557–66.Google Scholar
Golbus, MS, Harrison, MR, Filly, RA, Callen, PW, Katz, M. In utero treatment of urinary tract obstruction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982; 142: 383–8.Google Scholar
Manning, FA, Harrison, MR, Rodeck, C. Catheter shunts for fetal hydronephrosis and hydrocephalus. Report of the International Fetal Surgery Registry. New Engl J Med. 1986; 315: 336–40.Google Scholar
Morris, RK, Malin, GL, Quinlan-Jones, E, Middleton, LJ, Hemming, K, Burke, D, Daniels, JP, Khan, KS, Deeks, J, Kilby, MD, Percutaneous vesicoamniotic shunting in Lower Urinary Tract Obstruction (PLUTO) Collaborative Group. Percutaneous vesicoamniotic shunting versus conservative management for fetal lower urinary tract obstruction (PLUTO): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2013; 382: 1496–506.Google Scholar
Quintero, RA, Johnson, MP, Romero, R, Smith, C, Arias, F, Guevara-Zuloaga, F, Cotton, DB, Evans, MI. In-utero percutaneous cystoscopy in the management of fetal lower obstructive uropathy. Lancet. 1995; 346: 537–40.Google Scholar
Harrison, MR, Langer, JC, Adzick, NS, Golbus, MS, Filly, RA, Anderson, RL, Rosen, MA, Callen, PW, Goldstein, RB, deLorimier, AA. Correction of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in utero, V. Initial clinical experience. J Pediatr Surg. 1990; 25: 47–55; discussion 6–7.Google Scholar
Harrison, MR, Adzick, NS, Bullard, KM, Farrell, JA, Howell, LJ, Rosen, MA, Sola, A, Goldberg, JD, Filly, RA. Correction of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in utero VII: a prospective trial. J Pediatr Surg. 1997; 32: 1637–42.Google Scholar
Harrison, MR, Adzick, NS, Flake, AW, Jennings, RW, Estes, JM, MacGillivray, TE, et al. Correction of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in utero: VI. Hard-earned lessons. J Pediatr Surg. 1993; 28: 1411–17; discussion 7–8.Google Scholar
Harrison, MR, Adzick, NS, Flake, AW, VanderWall, KJ, Bealer, JF, Howell, LJ, Farrell, JA, Filly, RA, Rosen, MA, Sola, A, Goldberg, JD. Correction of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in utero VIII: Response of the hypoplastic lung to tracheal occlusion. J Pediatr Surg. 1996; 31: 1339–48.Google Scholar
VanderWall, KJ, Bruch, SW, Meuli, M, Kohl, T, Szabo, Z, Adzick, NS, Harrison, MR. Fetal endoscopic (‘Fetendo’) tracheal clip. J Pediatr Surg. 1996; 31: 1101–3; discussion 3–4.Google Scholar
Flake, AW, Crombleholme, TM, Johnson, MP, Howell, LJ, Adzick, NS. Treatment of severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia by fetal tracheal occlusion: clinical experience with fifteen cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183: 1059–66.Google Scholar
Deprest, J, Gratacos, E, Nicolaides, KH. Fetoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) for severe congenital diaphragmatic hernia: evolution of a technique and preliminary results. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 24: 121–6.Google Scholar
Meuli, M, Meuli-Simmen, C, Hutchins, GM, Yingling, CD, Hoffman, KM, Harrison, MR, Adzick, NS. In utero surgery rescues neurological function at birth in sheep with spina bifida. Nature Med. 1995; 1: 342–7.Google Scholar
Meuli, M, Meuli-Simmen, C, Yingling, CD, Hutchins, GM, Timmel, GB, Harrison, MR, Adzick, NS. In utero repair of experimental myelomeningocele saves neurological function at birth. J Pediatr Surg. 1996; 31: 397–402.Google Scholar
Heuer, GG, Adzick, NS, Sutton, LN. Fetal myelomeningocele closure: technical considerations. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015; 37: 166–71.Google Scholar
Belfort, MA, Whitehead, WE, Shamshirsaz, AA, Bateni, ZH, Olutoye, OO, Olutoye, OA, et al. Fetoscopic open neural tube defect repair: development and refinement of a two-port, carbon dioxide insufflation technique. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129: 734–43.Google Scholar
Graf, K, Kohl, T, Neubauer, BA, Dey, F, Faas, D, Wanis, FA, Reinges, MH, Uhl, E, Kolodziej, MA. Percutaneous minimally invasive fetoscopic surgery for spina bifida aperta. Part III: neurosurgical intervention in the first postnatal year. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 47: 158–61.Google Scholar
Pedreira, DA, Zanon, N, Nishikuni, K, Moreira de Sá, RA, Acacio, GL, Chmait, RH, Kontopoulos, EV, Quintero, RA. Endoscopic surgery for the antenatal treatment of myelomeningocele: the CECAM trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 214:111 e1–11.Google Scholar
Belfort, MA, Whitehead, WE, Shamshirsaz, AA, Ruano, R, Cass, DL, Olutoye, OO. Fetoscopic Repair of Meningomyelocele. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126: 881–4.Google Scholar
Kabagambe, SK, Jensen, GW, Chen, YJ, Vanover, MA, Farmer, DL. Fetal Surgery for Myelomeningocele: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes in Fetoscopic versus Open Repair. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2018; 43: 161–74.Google Scholar
Olutoye, OA, Baker, BW, Belfort, MA, Olutoye, OO. Food and Drug Administration warning on anesthesia and brain development: implications for obstetric and fetal surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 218: 98–102.Google Scholar
Luks, FI, Deprest, J, Marcus, M, Vandenberghe, K, Vertommen, JD, Lerut, T, Brosens, I. Carbon dioxide pneumoamnios causes acidosis in fetal lamb. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1994; 9: 105–9.Google Scholar
Gratacós, E, Wu, J, Devlieger, R, Van de Velde, M, Deprest, JA. Effects of amniodistention with carbon dioxide on fetal acid-base status during fetoscopic surgery in a sheep model. Surg Endosc. 2001; 15: 368–72.Google Scholar
Saiki, Y, Litwin, DE, Bigras, JL, Waddell, J, Konig, A, Baik, S, Navsarikar, A, Rebeyka, IM. Reducing the deleterious effects of intrauterine CO2 during fetoscopic surgery. J Surg Res. 1997; 69: 51–4.Google Scholar
Baschat, AA, Ahn, ES, Murphy, J, Miller, JL. Fetal blood gas values during fetoscopic myelomeningocele repair performed under carbon dioxide insufflation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 52: 400–2.Google Scholar
Joyeux, L, Chalouhi, GE, Ville, Y, Sapin, E. [Maternal-fetal surgery for spina bifida: future perspectives]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2014; 43: 443–54.Google Scholar
Rice, HE, Estes, JM, Hedrick, MH, Bealer, JF, Harrison, MR, Adzick, NS. Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation: a sheep model of fetal hydrops. J Pediatr Surg. 1994; 29: 692–6.Google Scholar
Baud, D, Windrim, R, Kachura, JR, Jefferies, A, Pantazi, S, Shah, P, Langer, JC, Forsey, J, Chaturvedi, RR, Jaeggi, E, Keating, S, Chiu, P, Ryan, G. Minimally invasive fetal therapy for hydropic lung masses: three different approaches and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 42: 440–8.Google Scholar
Cass, DL, Olutoye, OO, Ayres, NA, Moise, KJ Jr., Altman, CA, Johnson, A, Cassady, CI, Lazar, DA, Lee, TC, Lantin, MR. Defining hydrops and indications for open fetal surgery for fetuses with lung masses and vascular tumors. J Pediatr Surg. 2012; 47: 40–5.Google Scholar
Cass, DL, Olutoye, OO, Cassady, CI, Zamora, IJ, Ivey, RT, Ayres, NA, Olutoye, OA, Lee, TC. EXIT-to-resection for fetuses with large lung masses and persistent mediastinal compression near birth. J Pediatr Surg. 2013; 48: 138–44.Google Scholar
Cass, DL, Olutoye, OO, Cassady, CI, Moise, KJ, Johnson, A, Papanna, R, Lazar, DA, Ayres, NA, Belleza-Bascon, B. Prenatal diagnosis and outcome of fetal lung masses. J Pediatr Surg. 2011; 46: 292–8.Google Scholar
Peranteau, WH, Boelig, MM, Khalek, N, Moldenhauer, JS, Martinez-Poyer, J, Hedrick, HL, Flake, AW, Johnson, MP, Adzick, NS. Effect of single and multiple courses of maternal betamethasone on prenatal congenital lung lesion growth and fetal survival. J Pediatr Surg. 2016; 51: 28–32.Google Scholar
Peiro, JL, Sbragia, L, Scorletti, F, Lim, FY, Shaaban, A. Management of fetal teratomas. Pediatr Surg Int. 2016; 32: 635–47.Google Scholar
Hedrick, HL, Flake, AW, Crombleholme, TM, Howell, LJ, Johnson, MP, Wilson, RD, Adzick, NS. Sacrococcygeal teratoma: prenatal assessment, fetal intervention, and outcome. J Pediatr Surg. 2004; 39: 430–8; discussion 430–8.Google Scholar
Paek, BW, Jennings, RW, Harrison, MR, Filly, RA, Tacy, TA, Farmer, DL, Albanese, CT. Radiofrequency ablation of human fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184: 503–7.Google Scholar
Lam, YH, Tang, MH, Shek, TW. Thermocoagulation of fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. Prenat Diagn. 2002; 22: 99–101.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, D, Ho, E, Scherl, SA, Sullivan, CM. Newborn with an open posterior hip dislocation and sciatic nerve injury after intrauterine radiofrequency ablation of a sacrococcygeal teratoma. J Pediatr Surg. 2003; 38: 248–50.Google Scholar
Hirose, S, Sydorak, RM, Tsao, K, Cauldwell, CB, Newman, KD, Mychaliska, GB, Albanese, CT, Lee, H, Farmer, DL. Spectrum of intrapartum management strategies for giant fetal cervical teratoma. J Pediatr Surg. 2003; 38: 446–50; discussion 446–50.Google Scholar
Laje, P, Johnson, MP, Howell, LJ, Bebbington, MW, Hedrick, HL, Flake, AW, Adzick, NS. Ex utero intrapartum treatment in the management of giant cervical teratomas. J Pediatr Surg. 2012; 47: 1208–16.Google Scholar
Abraham, RJ, Sau, A, Maxwell, D. A review of the EXIT (Ex utero Intrapartum Treatment) procedure. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 30: 1–5.Google Scholar
Liechty, KW, Crombleholme, TM, Flake, AW, Morgan, MA, Kurth, CD, Hubbard, AM, Adzick, NS. Intrapartum airway management for giant fetal neck masses: the EXIT (ex utero intrapartum treatment) procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 177: 870–4.Google Scholar
Laje, P, Tharakan, SJ, Hedrick, HL. Immediate operative management of the fetus with airway anomalies resulting from congenital malformations. Sem Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016; 21: 240–5.Google Scholar
Hedrick, HL, Flake, AW, Crombleholme, TM, Howell, LJ, Johnson, MP, Wilson, RD, Adzick, NS. The ex utero intrapartum therapy procedure for high-risk fetal lung lesions. J Pediatr Surg. 2005; 40: 1038–43; discussion 44.Google Scholar
Roybal, JL, Moldenhauer, JS, Khalek, N, Bebbington, MW, Johnson, MP, Hedrick, HL, Adzick, NS, Flake, AW. Early delivery as an alternative management strategy for selected high-risk fetal sacrococcygeal teratomas. J Pediatr Surg. 2011; 46: 1325–32.Google Scholar
Mychaliska, GB, Bealer, JF, Graf, JL, Rosen, MA, Adzick, NS, Harrison, MR. Operating on placental support: the ex utero intrapartum treatment procedure. J Pediatr Surg. 1997; 32: 227–30; discussion 30–1.Google Scholar

References

March of Dimes, Partnership for Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health, Save the Children, WHO. Born too soon: the global action report on preterm birth. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2012.Google Scholar
Glass, HC, Costarino, AT, Stayer, SA, Brett, CM, Cladis, F, Davis, PJ. Outcomes for extremely premature infants. Anesth Analg. 2015; 120: 1337–51.Google Scholar
Callaghan, WM, MacDorman, MF, Rasmussen, SA, Qin, C, Lackritz, EM. The contribution of preterm birth to infant mortality rates in the United States. Pediatrics. 2006; 118: 1566–73.Google Scholar
Anderson, JG, Baer, RJ, Partridge, JC, Kuppermann, M, Franck, LS, Rand, L, Jelliffe-Pawlowski, LL, Rogers, EE. Survival and major morbidity of extremely preterm infants: a population-based study. Pediatrics. 2016; 138: e20154434.Google Scholar
Coalson, JJ. Pathology of new bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Semin Neonatol. 2003; 8: 73–81.Google Scholar
Maynes, EA, Callaghan, JC. A new method of oxygenation: a study of its use in respiratory support and the artificial placenta. Ann Surg. 1963; 158: 537–42.Google Scholar
Zapol, WM, Kolobow, T, Pierce, JG, Bowman, RL. Artificial placenta: two days of total extrauterine support of the isolated premature lamb fetus. Science. 1969; 166: 617–18.Google Scholar
Kuwabara, Y, Okai, T, Imanishi, Y, Muronosono, E, Kozuma, S, Takeda, S, Baba, K, Mizuno, M. Development of extrauterine fetal incubation system using extracorporeal membrane oxygenator. Artif Organs 1986; 11; 224–77.Google Scholar
Kuwabara, Y, Okai, T, Kozuma, S, Unno, N, Akiba, K, Shinozuka, N, Maeda, T, Mizuno, M. Artificial placenta: long-term extrauterine incubation of isolated goat fetuses. Artif Organs. 1989; 13: 527–31.Google Scholar
Unno, N, Kuwabara, Y, Okai, T, Kido, K, Nakayama, H, Narumiya, Y, Kozuma, S, Taketani, Y, Tamura, M. Development of an artificial placenta: survival of isolated goat fetuses for up to three weeks with umbilical arteriovenous extracorporeal oxygenation. Artif Organs. 1993; 17: 996–1003.Google Scholar
Unno, N, Baba, K, Kozuma, S, Nishina, H, Okai, T, Kuwabara, Y, Taketani, Y. An evaluation of the system to control blood flow in maintaining goat fetuses on arterio-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a novel approach to the development of an artificial placenta. Artif Organs. 1997; 21: 1239–46.Google Scholar
Yasufuku, M, Hisano, K, Sakata, M, Okada, M. Arterio-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation of fetal goat incubated in artificial amniotic fluid (artificial placenta): influence on lung growth and maturation. J Pediatr Surg. 1998; 33: 442–8.Google Scholar
Pak, SC, Song, CH, So, GY, Jang, CH, Lee, KH, Kim, JY. Extrauterine incubation of fetal goats applying the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation via umbilical artery and vein. J Korean Med Sci. 2002; 17: 663–8.Google Scholar
Awad, JA, Cloutier, R, Fournier, L, Major, D, Martin, L, Masson, M, Guidoin, R. Pumpless respiratory assistance using a membrane oxygenator as an artificial placenta: a preliminary study in newborn and preterm lambs. J Invest Surg. 1995; 8: 21–30.Google Scholar
Reoma, JL, Rojas, A, Kim, AC, Khouri, JS, Boothman, E, Brown, K, et al. Development of an artificial placenta I: pumpless arterio-venous extracorporeal life support in a neonatal sheep model. J Pediatr Surg. 2009; 44: 53–9.Google Scholar
Mirua, Y, Matsuda, T, Funakubo, A, Watanabe, S, Kitanishi, R, Saito, M, Hanita, T. Novel modification of an artificial placenta: pumpless arteriovenous extracorporeal life support in a premature lamb model. Pediatr Res. 2002; 72: 490–94.Google Scholar
Schoberer, M, Arens, J, Erben, A, Ophelders, D, Jellema, RK, Kramer, BW, et al. Miniaturization: the clue to clinical application of the artificial placenta. Artif Organs. 2014; 38: 208–14.Google Scholar
Gray, BW, El-Sabbagh, A, Zakem, SJ, Kock, KL, Rojas-Pena, A, Owens, GE, et al. Development of an artificial placenta V: 70h veno-venous extracorporeal life support after ventilatory failure in premature lambs. J Pediatr Surg. 2013; 48: 145–53.Google Scholar
Bryner, B, Gray, B, Perkins, E, Davis, R, Hoffman, H, Barks, J, et al. An extracorporeal placenta supports extremely premature lambs for one week. J Pediatr Surg. 2015; 50: 44–49.Google Scholar
Partridge, EA, Davey, MG, Hornick, MA, McGovern, PE, Majaddam, AY, Vrecenak, JD, et al. An extra-uterine system to physiologically support the extreme preterm lamb. Nat Comm. 2017; 8: 15112.Google Scholar
Beall, MH, van den Wijngaard, JPHM, van Gemert, MJ, Ross, MG. Amniotic fluid water dynamics. Placenta. 2007; 28: 816–23.Google Scholar
Hornick, MA, Davey, MG, Partridge, EA, Mejaddam, AY, McGovern, PE, Olive, AM, et al. Umbilical cannulation optimizes circuit flows in premature lambs supported by the EXTra-uterine Environment for Neonatal Development (EXTEND). J Physiol. 2018; 596: 1575–85.Google Scholar
Stockmann, C, Fandrey, J. Hypoxia-induced erythropoietin production: a paradigm for oxygen-regulated gene expression. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2006; 33: 968–79.Google Scholar
Creasy, RK, Drost, M, Green, MV, Morris, JA. Determination of fetal, placental and neonatal blood volumes in the sheep. Circ Res. 1970; 27: 487–94.Google Scholar
Faber, JJ, Green, TJ. Foetal placental blood flow in the lamb. J Physiol. 1972; 223: 375–93.Google Scholar
Joshi, S, Kotecha, S. Lung growth and development. Early Hum Dev. 2007; 83: 789–94.Google Scholar
Hanif, F, Drennan, K, Mari, G. Variables that affect the middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity in fetuses with anemia and intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Perinatol. 2007; 24: 501–5.Google Scholar
Papademetriou, M, Tachtsidis, I, Elliott, MJ, Hoskote, A, Elwell, CE. Wavelet cross-correlation to investigate regional variations in cerebral oxygenation in infants supported on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Adv Exp Med Biol .2013; 765; 203–9.Google Scholar
Short, BL, Walker, LK, Bender, KS, Travstman, RJ. Impairment of cerebral autoregulation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in newborn lambs. Pediatr Res. 1993; 33: 289–94.Google Scholar
Stolar, CJ, Reyes, C. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation causes significant changes in intracranial pressure and carotid artery blood flow in newborn lambs. J Pediatr Surg. 1988; 23: 1163–8.Google Scholar
Walker, LK, Short, BL, Travstman, RJ. Impairment of cerebral autoregulation during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the newborn lamb. Crit Care Med. 1996; 24: 2001–6.Google Scholar
Iisselstiin, H, van Heist, AF. Long-term outcome of children treated with neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: increasing problems with increasing age. Semin Perinatol. 2014; 38: 114–121.Google Scholar
Kumar, P, Bedard, MP, Shankaran, S, Delaney-Black, V. Post extracorporeal membrane oxygenation single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) as a predictor of neurodevelopmental outcome. Pediatrics. 1994; 93: 951–55.Google Scholar
Danzer, E, Hoffman, C, D’Agostino, JA, Connelly, JT, Wagar, LN, Gerdes, M, et al. Short-term neurodevelopmental outcome in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: the impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and timing of repair. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018; 19: 64–74.Google Scholar
Miura, Y, Saito, M, Usuda, H, Woodward, E, Rittenschober-Bohm, J, Kannan, PS, et al. Ex-Vivo uterine environment (EVE) therapy induced limited fetal inflammation in a premature lamb model. PLOS One. 2015; 10: 1–17.Google Scholar
Usuda, H, Watanabe, S, Miura, Y, Saito, M, Musk, GC, Rittenschober-Bohm, J, et al. Successful maintenance of key physiological parameters in preterm lambs treated with ex vivo uterine environment therapy for a period of 1 week. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 217: 457. e1–13.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×