COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EU
Court of Justice
Case 76/72 Michel S. v Fonds national de reclassement social des handicapés EU:C:1973:46
Case 8/74 Dassonville EU:C:1974:82
Case 36/75 Rutili v Ministre de l’intérieur EU:C:1975:137
Case 48/75 Royer EU:C:1976:57
Case 98/79 Pecastaing v Belgian State EU:C:1980:69
Case 163/82 Commission v Italy EU:C:1983:295
Case 184/83 Hofmann v Barmer Ersatzkasse EU:C:1984:273
Case 267/83 Diatta EU:C:1985:67
Case 222/84 Johnston v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary EU:C:1986:206
Case 59/85 Reed EU:C:1986:157
Case 222/86 Unectef v Heylens and others EU:C:1987:442
Case 5/88 Wachauf EU:C:1989:321
Case C-308/89 Di Leo v Land Berlin EU:C:1990:400
Case C-370/90 Singh EU:C:1992:296
Case C-97/91 Oleificio Borelli v Commission EU:C:1992:491
Case C-13/94 P v S and Cornwall County Council EU:C:1996:170
Case C-65/95 The Queen v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Shingara EU:C:1997:300
Case C-243/95 Hill and Stapleton v The Revenue Commissioners and the Department of Finance EU:C:1998:298
Case C-351/95 Kadiman EU:C:1997:205
Case C-85/96 Martínez Sala v Freistaat Bayern EU:C:1998:217
Case C-249/96 Grant EU:C:1998:63
Case C-218/98 Abdoulaye v Renault EU:C:1999:424
Case C-357/98 The Queen v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Yiadom EU:C:2000:604
Joined Cases C-122/99 P and C-125/99 P D and Sweden v Council EU:C:2001:304
Case C-413/99 Baumbast EU:C:2002:493
Case C-459/99 MRAX EU:C:2002:461
Case C-60/00 Carpenter EU:C:2002:434
Case C-117/01 K.B. EU:C:2004:7
Case C‑452/01 Ospelt and Schlössle Weissenberg EU:C:2003:493
Case C-148/02 Garcia Avello EU:C:2003:539
Case C-200/02 Zhu and Chen EU:C:2004:639
Case C-373/03 Aydinli EU:C:2005:434
Case C-540/03 Parliament v Council EU:C:2006:429
Case C-1/05 Jia v Migrationsverket EU:C:2007:1
Case C-325/05 Derin EU:C:2007:442
Case C-267/06 Maruko EU:C:2008:179
Case C-353/06 Grunkin-Paul EU:C:2008:559
Case C-435/06 C EU:C:2007:714
Case C-453/07 Er EU:C:2008:524
Case C-127/08 Metock EU:C:2008:449
Case C-147/08 Römer EU:C:2011:286
Case C-310/08 Ibrahim EU:C:2010:1065
Case C-371/08 Ziebell EU:C:2011:809
Case C-480/08 Teixeira EU:C:2010:83
Case C-578/08 Chakroun EU:C:2010:117
Case C-14/09 Genc EU:C:2010:57
Case C-34/09 Ruiz Zambrano EU:C:2011:124
Case C-208/09 Sayn-Wittgenstein EU:C:2010:806
Case C-372/09 Peñarroja Fa EU:C:2011:156
Case C-391/09 Runevič-Vardyn and Wardyn EU:C:2011:291
Case C-542/09 Commission v The Netherlands EU:C:2012:346
Case C-149/10 Chatzi EU:C:2010:534
Case C-400/10 PPU McB EU:C:2010:582
Case C-430/10 Gaydarov EU:C:2011:749
Case C-617/10 Åkerberg Fransson EU:C:2013:105.
Case C-40/11 Iida EU:C:2012:691
Case C-83/11 Secretary of State for the Home Department v Rahman EU:C:2012:519
Case C-221/11 Demirkan EU:C:2013:583
Case C-249/11 Byankov EU:C:2012:608
Case C-256/11 Dereci EU:C:2011:734
Case C-300/11 ZZ v Secretary of State for the Home Department EU:C:2013:363
Joined Cases C-356/11 and C-357/11 O. and S. EU:C:2012:776
Case C-431/11 United Kingdom v Council EU:C:2013:589
Case C-529/11 Alarape EU:C:2013:290
Case C-583/11 Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and others v European Parliament and Council EU:C:2013:625
Case C-656/11 United Kingdom v Council EU:C:2014:97
Case C‑86/12 Alokpa and Moudoulou EU:C:2013:645
Case C-92/12 HSE EU:C:2012:255
Case C-167/12 CD v ST EU:C:2014:169
Case C-267/12 Hay EU:C:2013:823
Joined Cases C‑293/12 and C‑594/12 Digital Rights Ireland and others EU:C:2014:238
Case C-363/12 Z v Government Department and the Board of Management of a Community School EU:C:2014:159
Case C‑370/12 Pringle EU:C:2012:756
Case C‑423/12 Flora Reyes EU:C:2014:16
Case C-456/12 O. and B. EU:C:2014:135
Case C-457/12 S v Minister voor Immigratie EU:C:2014:136
Case C-81/13 United Kingdom v Council EU:C:2014:2449
Case C‑138/13 Dogan EU:C:2014:2066
Case C-244/13 Ogieriakhi EU:C:2014:2068
Case C-437/13 Unitrading Ltd v Staatssecretaris van Financiën EU:C:2014:2318
Case C-165/14 Rendón Marín EU:C:2016:675
Case C-169/14 Sánchez Morcillo v Banco Bilbao Vizcaya EU:C:2014:2099
Case C-218/14 Singh EU:C:2015:476
Case C-222/14 Maïstrellis EU:C:2015:473
Case C-299/14 Vestische Arbeit Jobcenter Kreis Recklinghausen v García-Nieto EU:C:2016:114
Case C‑362/14 Schrems (I) EU:C:2015:650
Joined Cases C‑439/14 and C‑488/14 Star Storage EU:C:2016:688
Joined Cases C-8/15 P to C-10/15 P Ledra Advertising v Commission and ECB EU:C:2016:701
Case C-115/15 NA EU:C:2016:487
Case C-133/15 Chavez-Vilchez and others EU:C:2017:354
Case C-205/15 DGRFP v Toma and Biroul EU:C:2016:499
Case C-231/15 Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej EU:C:2016:769
Case C-401/15 Depesme and Kerrou EU:C:2016:955
Case C-428/15 Child and Family Agency EU:C:2016:819
Case C-443/15 Parris EU:C:2016:897
Case C-64/16 Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses EU:C:2018:117
Case C-82/16 K.A. and others EU:C:2018:308
Case C-165/16 Toufik Lounes EU:C:2017:862
Case C-174/16 H EU:C:2017:637
Case C-451/16 MB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions EU:C:2018:492
Case C-550/16 A. and S. EU:C:2018:248
Case C-673/16 Coman and others EU:C:2018:385
Case C-89/17 Banger EU:C:2018:570
Case C-335/17 Neli Valcheva v Georgios Babanarakis EU:C:2018:359
Case C‑89/18 A v Udlændinge- og Integrationsministeriet EU:C:2019:580
Case C-94/18 Chenchooliah v Minister for Justice and Equality EU:C:2019:6930
Case C-129/18 SM EU:C:2019:248
Case C-311/18 Facebook Ireland and Schrems (Schrems II) EU:C:2020:559
Joined Cases C-518/18, C-624/18 and C-625/18 A.K. (Independence of the Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court) EU:C:2019:982
Case C-519/18 Bevándorlási és Menekültügyi Hivatal EU:C:2019:1070
Case C-619/18 Commission v Poland (Independence of the Supreme Court) EU:C:2019:531
Case C-836/18 Subdelegación del Gobierno en Ciudad Real v RH EU:C:2020:119
Case C-181/19 JD EU:C:2020:794
Joined Cases C-245/19 and C-246/19 État luxembourgeois contre B EU:C:2020:795
Case C-817/19 Ligue des droits humains EU:C:2022:491
Case C-129/20 Caisse pour l’avenir des enfants (Emploi à la naissance) EU:C:2021:140
Case C-247/20 VI EU:C:2022:177
Case C‑379/20 B v Udlændingenævnet EU:C:2021:660
Case C-379/20 Summary of the request for a preliminary ruling pursuant to Article 98(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice by Østre Landsret (Eastern High Court, Denmark), lodged on 11 August 2020
Case C-490/20 V.M.A. v Stolichna obshtina, rayon ‘Pancharevo’ EU:C:2021:1008
Case C-2/21 Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich EU:C:2022:502
Order of the Court in Case C-2/21 Rzecznik Praw Obywatelskich EU:C:2022:502
Case C-156/21 Hungary v Parliament and Council EU:C:2022:97
Case C-157/21 Poland v Parliament and Council EU:C:2022:98
Action brought on 19 December 2022 in Case C-769/22 Commission v Hungary [2023] OJ C54/16
General Court
Case T-65/92 Arauxo-Dumay EU:T:1993:47
Case T-461/08 Evropaïki Dynamiki v European Investment Bank EU:T:2011:494
Case T-517/16 Janoha and others v Commission EU:T:2018:874
Case T-484/18 XB v ECB EU:T:2020:90
Case T-131/20 IR v Commission EU:T:2020:381
Opinions of Advocates General
Opinion of Advocate General Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer in Case C-65/95 The Queen v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Shingara EU:C:1996:451
Opinion of Advocate General Mischo in Joined Cases C-122/99 P and C-125/99 P D and Sweden v Council EU:C:2001:113
Opinion of Advocate General Geelhoed in Case C-413/99 Baumbast and R EU:C:2001:385
Opinion of Advocate General Stix-Hackl in Case C-60/00 Carpenter EU:C:2001:447
Opinion of Advocate General Kokott in Case C-480/08 Teixeira EU:C:2009:642
Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston in Case C-34/09 Ruiz Zambrano EU:C:2010:560
Opinion of Advocate General Bot in Case C-108/10 Scattolon EU:C:2011:211
Opinion of Advocate General Kokott in Case C-110/10 Solvay v Commission EU:C:2011:257
Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi in Case C-249/11 Byankov EU:C:2012:380
Opinion of Advocate General Bot in Case C-300/11 ZZ v Secretary of State for the Home Department EU:C:2012:563
Opinion of Advocate General Kokott in Case C-167/12 CD v ST EU:C:2013:600
Opinion of Advocate General Wahl in Case C-363/12 Z v Government Department and the Board of Management of a Community School EU:C:2013:604
Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi in Case C-423/12 Flora May Reyes EU:C:2014:16
Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar in Case C-202/13 McCarthy and others EU:C:2014:345
Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar in Case C-133/15 Chavez-Vilchez and others EU:C:2016:659
Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet in Case C-401/15 Depesme and Kerrou EU:C:2016:430
Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet in Case C-673/16 Coman and others EU:C:2018:2
Opinion of Advocate General Bobek in Case C-89/17 Banger EU:C:2018:225
Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar in Case C-335/17 Valcheva v Babanarakis EU:C:2018:242
Opinion of Advocate General Kokott in Case C-490/20 V.М.А. v Stolichna obshtina, rayon ‘Pancharevo’ EU:C:2021:296
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Marckx v Belgium, Application no 6833/74
Johnston and Others v Ireland, Application no 9697/82
Christine Goodwin v the United Kingdom, Application no 28957/95
E v the United Kingdom, Application no 33218/96
Salgueiro Da Silva Mouta v Portugal, Application no 33290/96
Karner v Austria, Application no 40016/98
Odièvre v France, Application no 42326/98
Mata Estevez v Spain, Application no 56501/00
S.H. and Others v Austria, Application no 57813/00
Kozak v Poland, Application no 13102/02
P.B. and J.S. v Austria, Application no 18984/02
B and L v the United Kingdom, Application no 36536/02
EB v France, Application no 43546/02
L v Lithuania, Application no 27527/03
Sporer v Austria, Application no 35637/03
Zaunegger v Germany, Application no 22028/04
Schalk and Kopf v Austria, Application no 30141/04
Schlumpf v Switzerland, Application no 29002/06
X and Others v Austria, Application no 19010/07
Gas and Dubois v France, Application no 25951/07
Chapin and Charpentier v France, Application no 40183/07
YY v Turkey, Application no 14793/08
Vallianatos and Others v Greece [GC], Application nos 29381/09 and 32684/09
Godelli v Italy, Application no 33783/09
Aldeguer Tomás v Spain, Application no 35214/09
Hämäläinen v Finland, Application no 37359/09
Taddeucci and McCall v Italy, Application no 51362/09
Manenc v France, Application no 66686/09
Fedotova and Others v Russia, Application nos 40792/10, 30538/14 and 43439/10
Hallier and Others v France, Application no 46386/10
Bonnaud and Lecoq v France, Application no 6190/11
Boeckel and Gessner-Boeckel v Germany, Application no 8017/11
Oliari and Others v Italy, Application nos 18766/11 and 36030/11
Mennesson v France, Application no 65192/11
Labassee v France, Application no 65941/11
Paradiso and Campanelli v Italy, Application no 25358/12
Orlandi and Others v Italy, Application no 26431/12
AP, Garçon and Nicot v France, Application nos 79885/12, 52471/13 and 52596/13
Delecolle v France, Application no 37646/13
Pajic v Croatia, Application no 68453/13
Maymulakhin and Markiv v Ukraine, Application no 75135/14
Charron and Merle-Montet v France, Application no 22612/15
A.D.-K. and Others v Poland, Application no 30806/15
S.-H. v Poland, Application nos 56846/15 and 56849/15
D.B. and Others v Switzerland, Application nos 58817/15 and 58252/15
X and Y v Romania, Application no 2145/16 and 20607/16
Honner v France, Application no 19511/16
YT v Bulgaria, Application no 41701/16
R.F. and Others v Germany, Application no 46808/16
Przybyszewska and Others v Poland, Application nos 11454/17 and 9 others
AD and Others v Georgia, Application nos 57864/17, 79087/17 and 55353/19
D. v France, Application no 11288/18
C.E. and Others v France, Application nos 29775/18 and 29693/19
A.M. v Norway, Application no 30254/18
Concurring Opinion of Judge O’Leary in A.M. v Norway, Application no 30254/18
Dissenting Opinion of Judge Jelić in A.M. v Norway, Application no 30254/18
O.H. and G.H. v Germany, Application nos 53568/18 and 54741/18
Buhuceanu and Others v Romania, Application nos 20081/19 and 20 others
Callamand v France, Application no 2338/20
EFTA Court
Case E-4/11 Clauder [2011] EFTA Ct. Rep. 216
Case E-26/13 Gunnarsson [2014] EFTA Ct. Rep. 254
Case E-28/15 Yankuba Jabbi v The Norwegian Government [2016] EFTA Ct. Rep. 575
Case E-4/19 Campbell v The Norwegian Government [2020] EFTA Ct. Rep. 21
Inter-American Court of Human Rights
Advisory Opinion (Opinión Consultativa) 24/17 of 24 November 2017 in a case concerning Costa Rica <https://corteidh.or.cr/docs/opiniones/seriea_24_eng.pdf>
International Court of Justice
Netherlands v Sweden (Application of the Convention of 1902 Governing the Guardianship of Infants) [1958] I.C.J. Reports 55.
Canada
Halpern v Canada (AG), [2003] O.J. No. 2268 (10 June 2003)
Reference Re Same-Sex Marriage [2004] 3 S.C.R 698
France
Cour de Cassation, Assemblée plénière, Nos 619 and 620 of 3 July 2015
Cour de Cassation, 1ère Chambre Civile, Nos 824–827 of 5 July 2017
Advisory Opinion concerning the recognition in domestic law of a legal parent–child relationship between a child born through a gestational surrogacy arrangement abroad and the intended mother [GC], request no. P16–2018–001, French Court of Cassation, 10 April 2019
Germany
Verwaltungsgericht München 1.6.2006 – M 2 K 05.1595
Republic of South Africa
Minister of Home Affairs and Another v Fourie and Another (CCT 60/04) [2005] ZACC 19
Lesbian and Gay Equality Project and Others v Minister of Home Affairs and Others [2005] ZACC 19
Taiwan
Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 748 of 24 May 2017
The Netherlands
Hoge Raad case no 463, 181.1980, Nederlands Jurisprudentie 1980, 1460
United Kingdom
Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42
In Re E (A Child) (Care Proceedings: European Dimension) Practice Note [2014] EWHC 6 (Fam).
Re HA (A Child) (Brussels IIA Art. 15) [2015] EWHC 1310 (Fam).
Re J (Children) (Brussels II Revised: Article 15) [2016] UKSC 15
Re TT and YY [2019] EWHC 2384, 25 September 2019
R (McConnell and YY) v Registrar General [2020] EWCA Civ 559, 29 April 2020
USA
Obergefell v Hodges (576 U.S. _ (2015))
Open access