Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-16T14:32:30.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 December 2024

Edited by
Marja-Liisa Öberg  and
Alina Tryfonidou
Marja-Liisa Öberg
Affiliation:
Lund University
Alina Tryfonidou
Affiliation:
University of Cyprus
Type
Chapter
Information
The Family in EU Law , pp. 263 - 280
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

References

Ackers, L. ‘Citizenship, gender and dependency in the EU: Women and internal migration’ in Hervey, K. H. and O’Keeffe, D. (eds), Sex Equality Law in the European Union (Wiley 1996).Google Scholar
Ackers, L. Shifting Spaces: Women, Citizenship and Migration within the European Union (Policy Press 1998).Google Scholar
Ackers, L., and Stalford, H., ‘Children, migration and citizenship in the European Union: Intra-community mobility and the status of children in EC law’ (1999) 21 Children and Youth Services Review 987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adam, S., and Van Elsuwege, P., ‘EU citizenship and the European federal challenge through the prism of family reunification’ in Kochenov, D. (ed), EU Citizenship and Federalism – The Role of Rights (Cambridge University Press 2017).Google Scholar
Almond, B. The Fragmenting Family (Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar
Antokolskaia, M. ‘Convergence and divergence of divorce laws in Europe’ (2006) 18 Child and Family Law Quarterly 307.Google Scholar
Antokolskaia, M. Harmonisation of Family Law in Europe: A Historical Perspective (Intersentia 2006).Google Scholar
Antokolskaia, M. ‘The search for a common core of divorce law: State intervention v. spouses’ autonomy’ in Martín-Casals, M. and Ribot, J. (eds), The Role of Self-Determination in the Modernisation of Family Law in Europe (Documenta Universitaria 2006).Google Scholar
Antokolskaia, M. ‘Harmonisation of substantive family law in Europe: Myths and reality’ (2010) 22 Child and Family Law Quarterly 397.Google Scholar
Antokolskaia, M. ‘Divorce in a European perspective’ in Scherpe, J. M. (ed), European Family Law Vol. III – Family Law in a European Perspective (Edward Elgar Publishing 2016).Google Scholar
Archard, D. The Family: A Liberal Defence (Palgrave Macmillan 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archard, D. ‘Family and family law: Concepts and norms’ in Brake, E. and Ferguson, L. (eds), Philosophical Foundations of Children’s and Family Law (Oxford University Press 2018).Google Scholar
Azoulai, L. ‘Transfiguring European citizenship: From Member State Territory to Union Territory, in EU citizenship and federalism: The role of rights’ in Kochenov, D. (ed), EU Citizenship and Federalism (Cambridge University Press 2015).Google Scholar
Azoulai, L. ‘The European individual and collective entities’ in Azoulai, L., Barbou des Places, S., and Pataut, E. (eds), Constructing the Person in EU Law: Rights, Roles, Identities (Hart Publishing 2016).Google Scholar
Bailey, A., and Boyle, P., ‘Untying and retying family migration in the New Europe’ (2004) 30 Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogh, L., László Pap, A., and Pásztor, E., ‘Hungary: The concept of family within the framework of “illiberal democracy”’ in Yassari, N. and Foblets, M.-C. (eds), Normativity and Diversity in Family Law (Springer 2022).Google Scholar
Banda, F., and Eekelaar, J., ‘International conceptions of the family’ (2017) 66 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbou des Places, S. ‘The integrated person in EU law’ in Azoulai, L., Barbou des Places, S., and Pataut, E. (eds), Constructing the Person in EU Law: Rights, Roles, Identities (Hart Publishing 2016).Google Scholar
Barbou des Places, S. ‘La famille du ressortissant d’État tiers: une famille désinstituée?’ in Fulchiron, H. (ed), La famille du migrant (Lexis Nexis 2020).Google Scholar
Barnard, C. S. The Substantive Law of the EU (Oxford University Press 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, G. ‘Family matters: European Community law and third country national family members’ (2003) 40 Common Market Law Review 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Başak, Ç., and Helfer, L., ‘The gender of treaty withdrawal: Lessons from the Istanbul Convention’ (EJIL: Talk!, 28 November 2022) <www.ejiltalk.org/the-gender-of-treaty-withdrawal-lessons-from-the-istanbul-convention/>..>Google Scholar
Beaumont, P. ‘Private international law concerning children in the UK after Brexit: Comparing Hague Treaty Law with EU Regulations’ (2017) 29 Child and Family Law Quarterly 214.Google Scholar
Beck-Gernsheim, E. Reinventing the Family: In Search of New Lifestyles (Polity Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Beqiraj, J., and Ippolito, F., ‘Conceptualizing an ‘association citizenship’ for children of Turkish workers’ in Thym, D. and Zoetewij-Turhan, M. H. (eds), Rights of Third-Country Nationals under EU Association Agreements (Brill 2015).Google Scholar
Bernardes, J. Family Studies: An Introduction (Routledge 1997).Google Scholar
Berneri, C. Family Reunification in the EU (Hart Publishing 2017).Google Scholar
Berneri, C. ‘Family reunification between static EU citizens and third country nationals’ (2018) 20 European Journal of Migration and Law 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boekestein, T. ‘Making do with what we have: On the interpretation and enforcement of the EU’s founding values’ (2022) 23 German Law Journal 431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boele-Woelki, K. ‘Cross-border family relations in Europe: Towards a common European matrimonial property law based upon cooperation between private international law and substantive law’ in Keirse, A. L. M. and Loos, M. B. M. (eds), Alternative Ways to Ius Commune – The Europeanisation of Private Law (Intersentia 2012).Google Scholar
Boele-Woelki, K., and Fuchs, A. (eds), Same-Sex Relationships and Beyond (Intersentia 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonelli, M. ‘Infringement Actions 2.0: How to protect EU values before the Court of Justice’ (2022) 18 European Constitutional Law Review 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonelli, M., and Claes, M.. ‘Crossing the Rubicon? The Commission’s use of Article 2 TEU in the infringement action on LGBTIQ+ rights in Hungary' (2023) 30 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottomley, A., and Wong, S., ‘Shared household: A new paradigm for thinking about the reform of domestic property relations’ in Diduck, A. and O’Donovan, K. (eds), Feminist Perspectives on Family Law (Routledge 2006).Google Scholar
Bracken, L. ‘Recognition of LGBTQI+ parent families across European borders’ (2022) 29 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, D. ‘Family law’ in Smits, J. M. (ed), Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2006).Google Scholar
Bribosia, E., and Rorive, I., ‘L’arrêt Coman: Quand la Cour de justice contribue à la reconnaissance du mariage homosexuel’ (2018) n 253 Journal de droit européen 344–347.Google Scholar
Brighouse, H., and Swift, A., Family Values: The Ethics of a Parent–Child Relationship (Princeton University Press 2014).Google Scholar
Brown, A. What Is the Family of Law? The Influence of the Nuclear Family (Hart 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, C., and Hannesson, Ó. Í., ‘Citizenship by the backdoor? Gunnarsson’ (2015) 52 Common Market Law Review 1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, E. Reflections on the Revolution in France (first published 1790) (Penguin 1968).Google Scholar
Caiola, A. ‘Une acception large de la notion de “conjoint” pour garantir la liberté de séjour des citoyens européens’ (2018) Revue des affaires européennes 335.Google Scholar
Camus, A. Resistance, Rebellion and Death (Wintage 1974).Google Scholar
Cannoot, P. ‘Inadmissibility decision in Bonnaud and Lecoq v. France: Should the Court have recognized the specificity of a same-sex relationship?’ (Strasbourg Observers, 11 April 2018) <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2018/04/11/inadmissibility-decision-in-bonnaud-and-lecoq-v-france-should-the-court-have-recognized-the-specificity-of-a-same-sex-relationship/>..>Google Scholar
Caracciolo di Torella, E., and Masselot, A., ‘Under construction: EU family law’ (2004) 29 European Law Review 32.Google Scholar
Caracciolo di Torella, E., and Foubert, P., ‘Maternity rights for intended mothers? Surrogacy puts the EU legal framework to the test’ (2014) 2 European Gender Equality Law Review 5.Google Scholar
Caracciolo di Torella, E., and Masselot, A., Caring Responsibilities in European Law and Policy (Routledge 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlier, J.-Y. ‘Vers un ordre public européen des droits fondamentaux – L’exemple de la reconnaissance des mariages de personnes de même sexe dans l’arrêt Coman’ (2019) Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme 220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrera, S. In Search of the Perfect Citizen? (Martinus Nijhoff 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrera, S., and Wiesbrock, A., ‘Civic integration of third-country nationals: Nationalism versus Europeanisation in the Common EU Immigration Policy’, CEPS 2009.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, H., and Chinkin, C., ‘The gender of jus cogens’ (1993) 15 Human Rights Law Review 63.Google Scholar
Cheal, D. Sociology of Family Life (Blackwell 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chieregato, E. ‘A work-life balance for all? Assessing the inclusiveness of EU Directive 2019/1158’ (2020) 36 International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choudhry, S. ‘Right to respect for private and family life (family life aspects)’, in Peers, S., Hervey, T., and Ward, A. (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Hart Publishing 2014).Google Scholar
Coltrane, S. Gender and Families (Rowman & Littlefield 1998).Google Scholar
Corrias, L., and Tinnevelt, R. (eds), European Ways of Life: Legal and Philosophical Perspectives (Edward Elgar Publishing, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Costello, C. ‘Article 33 family and professional life’ in Peers, S., Hervey, T., and Ward, A. (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Hart Publishing 2014).Google Scholar
Craig, P., and de Búrca, G., EU Law: Text, Cases and Materials (UK Version) (Oxford University Press 2020).Google Scholar
Cretney, S. Family Law in the Twentieth Century: A History (Oxford University Press 2004).Google Scholar
Cretney, S. Same Sex Relationships from ‘Odious Crime’ to ‘Gay Marriage’ (Oxford University Press 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czapanskiy, K. ‘Volunteers and draftees: The struggle for parental equality’ (1991) 38 UCLA Law Review 1415.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska-Kłosińska, P. ‘The right to family reunion vs integration conditions for third-country nationals’ (2018) 20 European Journal of Migration and Law 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dailey, A. ‘Federalism and families’ (1995) 143 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, J., and Hanley, S., ‘What’s wrong with East-Central Europe? The fading mirage of the “Liberal Consensus”’ (2016) 27 Journal of Democracy 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, M., and Muir, E., ‘Hungary and the indirect protection of EU fundamental rights and the rule of law’ (2013) 14 German Law Journal 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Baere, G., and Gutman, K., ‘The impact of the European Union and the European Court of Justice on European Family Law’ in Scherpe, J. M. (ed), European Family Law Vol. I – The Impact of Institutions and Organisations on European Family Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2016).Google Scholar
De Capitani, C. ‘Rainbow families and the right to freedom of movement – the V.М.А. v Stolichna Obshtina, Rayon ‘Pancharevo’ Case’ (EU Law Analysis, 11 January 2022) <http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2022/01/rainbow-families-and-right-to-freedom.html>..>Google Scholar
de Witte, B. ‘The past and future of the European Court of Justice in the protection of human rights’ in Alston, P. (ed), The EU and Human Rights (Oxford University Press 1999).Google Scholar
Derave, C., and Ouhnaoui, H., ‘C.E. & al. v. France: Legal recognition of intended parenthood from previous same-sex relationships (between women)’ (Strasbourg Observers, 7 October 2022) <http://strasbourgobservers.com/2022/10/07/c-e-al-v-france-legal-recognition-of-intended-parenthood-from-previous-same-sex-relationships-between-women/>..>Google Scholar
Dermott, E., and Fowler, T. M., ‘What is a family and why does it matter’ (2020) 9 Social Sciences 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diduck, A. Law’s Families (Cambridge University Press 2003).Google Scholar
Diduck, A. ‘Shifting familiarity’ (2005) 58 Current Legal Problems 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diduck, A., and Kaganas, F., Family Law, Gender and the State (Hart Publishing 2012).Google Scholar
Dopffel, H. P. and Scherpe, J. M. ‘Gleichgeschlechtliche Lebensgemeinschaften im Recht der nordischen Länder’ in Basedow, J., Hopt, K. J., Kötz, H., and Dopffel, H. P. (eds), Die Rechtsstellung gleichgeschlechtlicher Lebensgemeinschaften (Mohr Siebeck 2000).Google Scholar
Dougan, M. ‘So long, farewell, aufwiedersehen, goodbye: The UK’s withdrawal package’ (2020) 57 Common Market Law Review 631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, G. ‘The intention to be a parent and the making of mothers’ (1994) 57 Modern Law Review 636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubout, E. ‘The European form of family life. The case of EU citizenship’ (2020) 5 European Papers 3.Google Scholar
Dutta, A., and others (eds), Scheidung ohne Gericht? (Gieseking 2017).Google Scholar
Editorial Comments, ‘Safeguarding EU values in the Member States – Is something finally happening?’ (2015) 52 Common Market Law Review 625.Google Scholar
Editorial Comments, ‘Who are the “peoples of Europe”?’ (2023) 60 Common Market Law Review 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, R., McCarthy, J., and Gillies, V., ‘The politics of concepts: Family and its (putative) replacements’ (2012) 63 British Journal of Sociology 730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eeckhout, P. ‘The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the federal question’ (2002) 39 Common Market Law Review 945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ergas, Y., Jenson, J., and Michel, S., ‘Introduction’ in Ergas, Y., Jenson, J., and Michel, S. (eds), Reassembling Motherhood: Procreation and Care in a Globalised World (Columbia University Press 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskridge, W. N. Jr. Equality Practice: Civil Unions and the Future of Gay Rights (Routledge 2002).Google Scholar
Espejo-Yaksic, N., Fenton-Glynn, C., and Scherpe, J.M. (eds), Surrogacy in Latin America (Intersentia 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabbrini, F. Fundamental Rights in Europe: Challenges and Transformations in Comparative Perspectives (Oxford University Press 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallon, M. ‘Observations sous CJUE, 5 juin 2018, Gr. Ch., Coman, C-673/16, EU:C:2018:385’ (Cahiers de l’EDEM, June 2018) <http://uclouvain.be/fr/instituts-recherche/juri/cedie/actualites/observations-sous-cjue-5-juin-2018-gr-ch-coman-c-673-16-eu-c-2018-385.html>..>Google Scholar
Featherstone, B., Gupta, A., Morris, K., and Warner, J., ‘Let us stop feeding the risk monster: Towards a social model of “child protection”’ (2018) 7 Families, Relationships and Societies 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Featherstone, B. Children and the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford University Press 2021).Google Scholar
Ferri, D., and Martinico, G., ‘Revisiting the Ruiz Zambrano Doctrine and exploring the potential for its extensive application’ (2021) 27 European Public Law 685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch, J. ‘Displaying families’ (2007) 41 Sociology 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finck, M., and Kas, B., ‘Surrogacy leave as a matter of EU law: CD and Z’ (2015) 52 Common Market Law Review 281.Google Scholar
Forder, C. ‘Legal protection under Article 8 ECHR: Marckx and beyond’ (1990) 37 Netherlands International Law Review 162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredman, S. ‘Reversing roles: Bringing fathers into the frame’ (2014) 10 International Journal of Law in Context 442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frick, M. L. ‘Illiberalims and human rights’ in Sajó, A., Uitz, R., and Holmes, S. (eds), Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism (Routledge 2021).Google Scholar
Fulchiron, H. ‘Un modèle familial européen?’ in Fulchiron, H. and Bidaut-Garon, C. (eds), Vers un statut européen de la famille (Dalloz 2014).Google Scholar
Fulchiron, H. ‘Citoyenneté européenne, liberté de circulation et reconnaissance des situations familiales créées dans un État membre: Un petit pas pour de grandes enjambées?’ (2018) Recueil Dalloz 1678.Google Scholar
Fulchiron, H. ‘La CEDH et la reconnaissance des mariages entre personnes de même sexe célébrés à l’étranger: Avis de tempête ou signal brouillé?’ (2018) Recueil Dalloz 446.Google Scholar
Fussey, P., and Rawlinson, P., Child Trafficking in the EU: Policing and Protecting Europe’s Most Vulnerable (Routledge 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganty, S. ‘Silence is not (always) golden: A criticism of the ECJ’s approach towards integration conditions for family reunification’ (2021) 23 European Journal of Migration and Law 176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganty, S. ‘Surrogacy as Citizenship Deprivation in S.-H. v. Poland’ (Strasbourg Observers, 14 March 2022) <http://strasbourgobservers.com/2022/03/14/surrogacy-deprives-from-citizenship-in-s-h-v-poland%EF%BF%BC/#:~:text= − %20H.,of%20the%20Polish%20legal%20system>..>Google Scholar
Gheaus, A. ‘Is the family uniquely valuable?’ (2012) 6 Ethics and Social Welfare 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilding, M. ‘Reflexivity over and above convention: The new orthodoxy in the sociology of personal life, formerly sociology of the family’ (2010) 61 British Journal of Sociology 757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gittins, D. The Family in Question (Macmillan 1985).Google Scholar
González Pascual, M., and Torres Pérez, A. (eds), The Right to Family Life in the European Union (Routledge 2018).Google Scholar
Goudappel, F. The Effects of EU Citizenship (T.M.C. Asser Press 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graff, A., and Korolczuk, E., ‘Gender and Illiberal Politics’ in M. Laruelle (ed), Oxford Handbook of Illiberalism (Oxford University Press 2023).Google Scholar
Groussot, X., and Gill-Pedro, E., ‘Old and new human rights in Europe – The scope of EU rights versus that of ECHR rights’ in Brems, E. and Gerards, J. (eds), Shaping the Rights in ECHR – The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press 2013).Google Scholar
Groussot, X., and Petursson, G. T., ‘The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights five years on – The emergence of a new constitutional framework’ in de Vries, S., Bernitz, U., and Weatherill, S. (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights as a Binding Instrument – Five Years Old and Growing (Hart Publishing 2015).Google Scholar
Grzebalska, W. ‘Poland’ in Kováts, E. and Põim, M. (eds), Gender as Symbolic Glue: The Position and Role of Conservative and Far Right Parties in the Anti-gender Mobilizations in Europe (FEPS – Foundation for European Progressive Studies 2015).Google Scholar
Grzebalska, W., and Pető, A., ‘The gendered modus operandi of the illiberal transformation in Hungary and Poland’ (2018) 68 Women’s Studies International Forum 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guild, E., Gortázar Rotaeche, C. J., and Kostakopoulou, D. (eds), The Reconceptualization of European Union Citizenship (Brill Nijhoff 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guild, E., Peers, S., and Tomkin, J., The EU Citizenship Directive: A Commentary (Oxford University Press 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guth, J. ‘When is a partner not a partner? Conceptualisations of “family” in EU Free Movement Law’ (2011) 33 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutman, K. ‘The essence of the fundamental right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union: The best is yet to come?’ (2019) 20 German Law Journal 884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halmai, G. ‘The early retirement age of the Hungarian judges’ in Nicola, F. and Davis, B. (eds), EU Law Stories: Contextual and Critical Histories of European Jurisprudence (Cambridge University Press 2017).Google Scholar
Hammje, P. ‘Obligation de reconnaissance d’un mariage entre personnes de même sexe conclu dans un État membre aux fins d’octroi d’un droit de séjour dérivé’ (2018) Revue critique de droit international privé 816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hantrais, L. ‘What is a family or family life in the European Union?’ in Guild, E. (ed), The Legal Framework and Social Consequences of Free Movement of Persons in the European Union (Kluwer 1999).Google Scholar
Harding, M. ‘The harmonisation of private international law in Europe: Taking the character out of family law?’ (2011) 7 Journal of Private International Law 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. ‘Positivism and the separation of law and morals’ (1958) 71 Harvard Law Review 593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, A. ‘Same-sex registered partnerships – A right to be recognized’ (2016) 75 Cambridge Law Journal 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herring, J., Probert, R., and Gilmore, S., Great Debates in Family Law (Macmillan 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herring, J. Family Law (Pearson 2017).Google Scholar
Hervey, T. H. ‘A gendered perspective on the right to family life in European Community law’ in Neuwahl, N. and Rosas, A. (eds), The European Union and Human Rights (Martinus Nijhoff 1995).Google Scholar
Hesová, Z. ‘Three types of culture wars and the populist strategies in Central Europe’ (2021) 28 Czech Journal of Political Science/Politologick 130.Google Scholar
Hodson, L. ‘Ties that bind: Towards a child-centred approach to lesbian, gay, bi-sexual and transgender families under the ECHR’ (2012) 20 International Journal of Children’s Rights 501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, S. ‘The antiliberal idea’ in Sajó, A., Uitz, R., and Holmes, S. (eds), Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism (Routledge 2021).Google Scholar
Honorati, C., and Baruffi, M. C., EU Private International Law in Family Matters: Legislation and CJEU Case Law (Intersentia 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyltén-Cavallius, K. ‘Who cares? Caregivers’ derived residence rights from children in EU free movement law’ (2020) 57 Common Market Law Review 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iglesias Sanchez, S. ‘Fundamental rights and citizenship of the Union at a crossroads: A promising alliance or a dangerous liaison?’ (2014) European Law Journal 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, S. ‘Resourcing the family: Gendered claims and obligations and issues of explanation’ in Silva, E. B. and Smart, C. (eds), The New Family? (Sage 1999).Google Scholar
Jackson, E. ‘What is a parent?’ in Diduck, A. and O’Donovan, K. (eds), Feminist Perspectives on Family Law (Routledge 2006).Google Scholar
Jacobs, F. G. (ed), European Law and the Individual (North Holland 1976).Google Scholar
Jakab, A., and Kochenov, D., ‘Introductory remarks’ in Jakab, A. and Kochenov, D. (eds), The Enforcement of EU Law and Values: Ensuring Member States’ Compliance (Oxford University Press 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaganas, F., and Day Sclater, S., ‘Contact disputes: Narrative constructions of “good” parents’ (2004) 12 Feminist Legal Studies 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, L. ‘A new chapter in the European rule of law saga?’ (VerfBlog, 4 March 2023) <https://verfassungsblog.de/a-new-chapter-in-the-european-rule-of-law-saga/>..>Google Scholar
Kemper, A. ‘Foundation of the nation: How political parties and movements are radicalising others in favour of conservative family values and against tolerance, diversity, and progressive gender politics in Europe’ (Friedrich Ebert Stiftung 2016) <http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/dialog/12503.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Kiernan, K. ‘Changing European families: Trends and issues’ in Scott, J., Treas, J., and Richards, M. (eds), The Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Families (Blackwell 2004).Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, C. ‘The Court of Justice and Labour Law in 2010: A new EU discrimination law architecture’ (2011) 40 Industrial Law Journal 280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, E. Oxford Dictionary of Quotations (Oxford University Press 2009).Google Scholar
Kochenov, D. ‘Gay rights in the EU: A long way forward for the Union of 27’ (2007) 3 Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy 469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochenov, D. ‘Mevrouw de Jong Gaat Eten: EU citizenship and the culture of prejudice’ EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2011/06 <https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/15774>..>Google Scholar
Kochenov, D. (ed), EU Citizenship and Federalism: The Role of Rights (Cambridge University Press 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochenov, D., and Belavusau, U., ‘After the celebration: Marriage equality in EU Law post-Coman in eight questions and some further thoughts’ (2020) 27 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochenov, D., and Belavusau, U., ‘Same-sex spouses: More free movement, but what about marriage? Coman’ (2020) 57 Common Market Law Review 227.Google Scholar
Kochenov, D., and van den Brink, M., ‘Pretending there is no union: Non-derivative Quasi-citizenship rights of third-country nationals in the EU’ in Thym, D. and Zoetewij-Turhan, M. H. (eds), Rights of Third-Country Nationals under EU Association Agreements (Brill 2015).Google Scholar
Koffeman, N. Morally Sensitive Issues and Cross-Border Movement in the EU: The Cases of Reproductive Matters and Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships (Intersentia 2015).Google Scholar
Koffeman, N. ‘Taddeucci and McCall v. Italy: Welcome novelty in the ECtHR’s case-law on equal treatment of same-sex couples’ (Strasbourg Observers, 27 July 2016) <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2016/07/27/taddeucci-and-mccall-v-italy-welcome-novelty-in-the-ecthrs-case-law-on-equal-treatment-of-same-sex-couples/>..>Google Scholar
Korolczuk, E. ‘“The war on gender” from a transnational perspective: Lessons for feminist strategising’ in Anti‐gender Movements on the Rise? Strategising for Gender Equality in Central and Eastern Europe (Heinrich Böll Stiftung 2014) <https://pl.boell.org/sites/default/files/uploads/2014/10/war_on_gender_korolczuk.pdf>.Google Scholar
Korolczuk, E., and Graff, A., ‘“Worse than Communism and Nazism put together”: War on gender in Poland’ in Kuhar, R. and Paternotte, D. (eds), Anti-gender Campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against Equality (Rowman & Littlefield 2017).Google Scholar
Korolczuk, E., and Graff, A., ‘Gender as “Ebola from Brussels”: The anticolonial frame and the rise of illiberal populism’ (2018) 43 Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koslowski, R., ‘A constructive approach to understanding the European Union as a federal polity’ (1999) 4 Journal of European Public Policy 561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krizsan, A., and Roggeband, C., ‘Towards a conceptual framework for struggles over democracy in backsliding states: Gender equality policy in Central Eastern Europe’ (2018) 6 Politics and Governance 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruger, T., and Samyn, L., ‘Brussels IIbis: Successes and suggested improvements’ (2016) 12 Journal of Private International Law 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuby, G. The Global Sexual Revolution: Destruction of Freedom in the Name of Freedom (Angelico Press 2015).Google Scholar
Kuhar, R., and Paternotte, D., Anti-gender Campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against Equality (Rowman & Littlefield 2017).Google Scholar
Kuskoff, E., and others, ‘Of good mothers and violent fathers: Negotiating child protection interventions in abusive relationships’ (2023) Violence Against Women (online first).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacroix, J. ‘Does Europe need common values?’ (2009) 8 European Journal of Political Theory 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambinet, F., and Gilson, S., ‘Arrêt “Hay”: Les partenaires (de même sexe) pacsés doivent-ils être traités comme des (hétérosexuels) Mariés’ 2014 Journal de droit européen 243.Google Scholar
Lamont, R. ‘Care proceedings with a European dimension under Brussels IIa: jurisdiction, mutual trust and the best interests of the child’ (2016) 28 Child and Family Law Quarterly 67.Google Scholar
Lamont, R. ‘Not a European family: Implications of Brexit for international family law’ (2017) 29 Child and Family Law Quartely 267.Google Scholar
Lamont, R. ‘The development of child protection across international borders for children at risk of harm’ in Douglas, G., Murch, M., and Stephens, V. (eds), International and National Perspectives on Child and Family Law (Intersentia 2018).Google Scholar
Lamont, R. ‘Article 24’ in Peers, S. and others (eds), The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (Hart Publishing 2021).Google Scholar
Lamont, R. ‘Child protection in international family law and the determination of where the child “belongs” for the purpose of jurisdiction’ (2022) 34 Child and Family Law Quarterly 401.Google Scholar
Lamont, R., and Fenton-Glynn, C., ‘Cross-border care and adoption proceedings in the European Union’ (2016) 38 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane Scheppele, K. ‘Enforcing the basic principles of EU law through systemic infringement actions’ in Closa, C. and Kochenov, D. (eds), Reinforcing Rule of Law Oversight in The European Union (Cambridge University Press 2021).Google Scholar
Lane Scheppele, K., Kochenov, D., and Grabowska-Moroz, B., ‘EU values are law, after All: Enforcing EU values through systemic infringement actions by the European Commission and the Member States of the European Union’ (2020) 39 Yearbook of European Law 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane Scheppele, K., and Morijn, J., ‘Frozen, how the EU is blocking funds to Hungary and Poland using a multitude of conditionalities’ (VerfBlog, 4 April 2023) <https://verfassungsblog.de/frozen/>..>Google Scholar
Laruelle, M. ‘Illiberalism: A conceptual introduction’ (2022) 38 East European Politics 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Łazowski, A. ‘When Cives Europae became bargaining chips: Free movement of persons in the Brexit negotiations’ (2018) 18 ERA Forum 469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebret, A. ‘The European Court of Human Rights and the framing of reproductive rights’ (2020) Droits Fondamentaux <www.crdh.fr/revue/n-18–2020/the-european-court-of-human-rights-and-the-framing-of-reproductive-rights/>..>Google Scholar
Leeder, E. The Family in Global Perspective: A Gendered Journey (Sage 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leib, E. J. ‘Friendship and the law’ (2007) 54 UCLA Law Review 631.Google Scholar
Lenaerts, K. ‘Exploring the limits of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2012) 8 European Constitutional Law Review 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lendvai-Bainton, N., and Szelewa, D., ‘Governing new authoritarianism: Populism, nationalism and radical welfare reforms in Hungary and Poland’ (2021) 55 Social Policy & Administration 559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, M. ‘Surrogacy and parenthood: A European saga of genetic essentialism and gender discrimination’ (2022) 29 Michigan Journal of Gender and Law 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lievens, J. ‘EHRM opent deur naar europese erkenning homohuwelijk’ (2018) Juristenkrant 1.Google Scholar
Linnamäki, K. ‘Not in front of the child: Illiberal familism and the Hungarian anti‐LGBTQ+ “Child Protective Law”’ (2022) 10 Politics and Governance 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardo, E., Kantola, J., and Rubio‐Marin, R., ‘De‐democratization and opposition to gender equality politics in Europe’ (2021) 28 Social Politics 521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loxa, A. ‘Analysis: “Cross-border recognition of parenthood for rainbow families”’ (EU Law Live, 14 December 2021) <https://eulawlive.com/analysis-cross-border-recognition-of-parenthood-for-rainbow-families-by-alezini-loxa/>..>Google Scholar
Lugosi, N. V. T. ‘Radical right framing of social policy in Hungary: Between nationalism and populism’ (2018) 34 Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy 210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund-Andersen, I. ‘Registered partnerships in Denmark’ in Scherpe, J. M. and Hayward, A. (eds), The Future of Registered Partnerships – Family Recognition beyond Marriage? (Intersentia 2017).Google Scholar
Mahmoud, Z. ‘Surrogates across the Atlantic: Comparing the impact of legal and health regulatory frameworks on surrogates’ autonomy, health and wellbeing’ (PhD thesis, University of Exeter 2022).Google Scholar
Mahmoud, Z., and Romanis, E. C., ‘On gestation and motherhood’ (2023) 31 Medical Law Review 109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mancini, S., and Palazzo, N., ‘The body of the nation: Illiberalism and gender’ in Sajó, A., Uitz, R., and Holmes, S. (eds), Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism (Routledge 2021).Google Scholar
Margaria, A., ‘Parenthood and cross-border surrogacy: What is “new”? The ECtHR’s First Advisory Opinion’ (2020) 28 Medical Law Review 412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Margaria, A., ‘Trans men giving birth and reflections on fatherhood: What to expect?’ (2020) 34 International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margaria, A., ‘Honner v France: Damage prevention and/or damage control?’ (Strasbourg Observers, 12 January 2021) <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2021/01/12/honner-v-france-damage-prevention-and-or-damage-control/>..>Google Scholar
Margaria, A., ‘Genetics and the construction of parenthood: The ECtHR jurisprudence on transnational surrogacy’ in Dethloff, N. and Kaesling, K. (eds), Between Sexuality, Gender and Reproduction – On the Pluralisation of Family Forms (Intersentia 2023).Google Scholar
Marguénaud, J.-P. ‘Le refus de la procréation médicalement assistée à un couple d’homosexuelles mariées ou la subsidiarité otage de la proportionnalité.’ (2018) Revue trimestrielle de droit civil 349.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. H. Citizenship and Social Class, and Other Essays (Cambridge University Press 1950).Google Scholar
Martens, P. ‘L’égalité dans l’adoption’ (2013) Revue de jurisprudence de Liège, Mons et Bruxelles 1404.Google Scholar
Martiny, D. ‘Divorce and maintenance between former spouses – Initial results of the Commission in European family law’ in Boele-Woelki, K. (ed), Perspectives for the Unification and Harmonisation of Family Law in Europe (Intersentia 2003).Google Scholar
Martiny, D. ‘Is unification of family law feasible or even desirable?’ in Hartkamp, A. S. and others (eds), Towards a European Civil Code (Kluwer 2011).Google Scholar
Marzano, V. J. ‘Oliari and the European Court of Human Rights: Where the court failed’ (2017) Pace International Law Review 241.Google Scholar
McCandless, J. ‘Reforming birth registration law in England and Wales?’ (2017) 4 Reproductive BioMedicine and Society Online 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClintock, A. ‘Family feuds. Gender, nationalism and the family’ (1993) 44 Feminist Review 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEleavy, P. ‘The Brussels II Regulation: How the European community has moved into family law’ (2002) 51 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEleavy, P. ‘Private international law: Brussels IIbis matrimonial matters, parental responsibility, child abduction and mutual recognition’ (2004) 53 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlynn, C. ‘A family law for the European Union?’ in Shaw, J. (ed), Social Law and Policy in an Evolving European Union (Hart Publishing 2000).Google Scholar
McGlynn, C. ‘Ideologies of motherhood in European community sex equality law’ (2000) 6 European Law Journal 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlynn, C. ‘Families and the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights: Progressive change or entrenching the status quo’ (2001) 26 European Law Review 582.Google Scholar
McGlynn, C. ‘Reclaiming a feminist vision: The reconciliation of paid work and family life in European Union law and policy’ (2001) 7 Columbia Journal of European Law 262.Google Scholar
McGlynn, C. ‘The Europeanisation of family law’ (2001) 13 Child and Family Law Quarterly 35.Google Scholar
McGlynn, C. Families and the European Union: Law, Politics and Pluralism (Cambridge University Press 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meeusen, J. ‘Instrumentalisation of private international law in the European Union: Towards a European conflicts revolution?’ (2007) 9 European Journal of Migration and Law 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meeusen, J. ‘Functional recognition of same-sex parenthood for the benefit of mobile Union citizens – Brief comments on the CJEU’s Pancharevo judgment – GEDIP’ (GEDIP-EGPIL, 2022) <https://eapil.org/2022/02/03/functional-recognition-of-same-sex-parenthood-for-the-benefit-of-mobile-union-citizens-brief-comments-on-the-cjeus-pancharevo-judgment/>..>Google Scholar
Melhuus, M. ‘Better safe than sorry: Legislating assisted conception in Norway’ in Krohn-Hansen, C. and Nustad, K. (eds), State formation: Anthropological perspectives (Pluto 2005).Google Scholar
Menendez, A. ‘Which free movement? Whose free movement?’ in Borelli, S. and Guazzarotti, A. (eds), Labour Mobility and Transnational Solidarity in the European Union (Jovene editore 2019).Google Scholar
Merin, Y. Equality for Same-Sex Couples: The Legal Recognition of Gay Partnerships in Europe and the United States (Rowman & Littlefield 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mewes, J. and Mau, S., ‘Unraveling working-class welfare chauvinism’ in Svallfors, S. (ed), Contested Welfare States: Welfare Attitudes in Europe and Beyond (Stanford University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Michaels, R., and Riles, A., ‘Law as technique’ in Foblets, M.-C. and others, The Oxford Handbook of Law and Anthropology (Oxford University Press 2022).Google Scholar
Milanich, N. ‘Certain mothers, uncertain fathers – Placing assisted reproductive technologies in historical perspective’ in Ergas, Y., Jenson, J., and Michel, S. (eds), Reassembling Motherhood: Procreation and Care in a Globalised World (Columbia University Press 2017).Google Scholar
Milios, G. ‘Defining “family members” of EU citizens and the circumstances under which they can rely on EU law’ (2020) 39 Yearbook of European Law 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millard, É. Famille et droit public. Recherches sur la construction d’un objet juridique, Tome 182 (LGDJ 1995).Google Scholar
Moebius, I., and Szyszczak, E., ‘Of raising pigs and children’ (1998) 18 Yearbook of European Law 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montale, M. Ossi Di Seppia (Piero Gobetti 1925).Google Scholar
Morgan, D. H. J. Family Connections (Polity Press 1996).Google Scholar
Moskal, M., and Tyrrell, N., ‘Family migration decision-making, step-migration and separation: Children’s experiences in European migrant worker families’ (2016) 14 Children’s Geographies 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller-Freienfels, W. ‘The unification of family law’ (1968) 16 The American Journal of Comparative Law 175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murat, P. ‘Article II-69’ in Burgorgue-Larsen, L., Levade, A., and Picod, F. (eds), Traité établissant une Constitution pour l’Europe. Commentaire article par article. Partie II: La Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union (Bruylant 2005).Google Scholar
Mustasaari, S. ‘Introduction to Special Issue on transnational child protection’ (2022) 34 Child and Family Law Quarterly 333.Google Scholar
Mustasaari, S. ‘Children abroad: A relational analysis of cross-border child protection cases in the Finnish Central Authority’ (2022) 34 Child and Family Law Quarterly 361.Google Scholar
Naldini, M., and Long, J.. ‘Geographies of families in the European Union: A legal and social policy analysis’ (2017) 31 International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nic Shuibhne, N. ‘The right to move and reside: Disentangling the dual dynamics of fundamental rights in EU citizenship law’ in Douglas-Scott, S. and Hatzis, N. (eds), Research Handbook on EU Law and Human Rights (Edward Elgar Publishing 2017).Google Scholar
O’Brien, C. ‘Between the devil and the deep blue sea: Vulnerable EU citizens cast adrift in the UK post-Brexit’ (2021) 58 Common Market Law Review 431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donovan, K. ‘Constructions of maternity and motherhood in stories of lost children’ in Bridgeman, J. and Monk, D. (eds), Feminist Perspectives on Child Law (Routledge 2000).Google Scholar
O’Leary, S. The Evolving Concept of Community Citizenship: From the Free Movement of Persons to Union Citizenship (Kluwer 1996).Google Scholar
Öberg, M.-L. ‘From EU citizens to third country nationals: The legacy of Polydor’ (2016) 22 European Public Law 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öberg, M.-L. ‘Internal market acquis as a tool in EU external relations: From integration to disintegration’ (2020) 47 Legal Issues of Economic Integration 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochiai, E. ‘Introduction: Reconstruction of intimate and public spheres in Asian modernity’ in Ochiai, E. and Aoi Hosoya, L. (eds), Transformation of the Intimate and the Public in Asian Modernity (Kyoto University Press 2013).Google Scholar
Palazzo, N. ‘The EU family: Is marital status emerging as a prohibited ground of discrimination?’ in Bernard, E., Cresp, M., and Ho-Dac, M. (eds), La famille dans l’ordre juridique de l’Union européenne / Family within the Legal Order of the European Union (Bruylant 2020).Google Scholar
Palazzo, N., and Tomasi, M., ‘I referendum in materia di diritti delle coppie omosessuali: Minoranze e vox populi’ (2016) 1 GenIUS 89.Google Scholar
Palonen, E. ‘Performing the nation: The Janus-faced populist foundations of illiberalism in Hungary’ (2018) 26 Journal of Contemporary European Studies 308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palumbo, L. ‘The borders of legal motherhood: Rethinking access to assisted reproductive technologies in Europe’ in Ergas, Y., Jenson, J., and Michel, S. (eds), Reassembling Motherhood: Procreation and Care in a Globalised World (Columbia University Press 2017).Google Scholar
Parti, K. ‘Illiberal and populist political narratives on gender and underreporting of sexual violence: A case study of Hungary’ (2022) 10 Politics and Governance 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parton, N. ‘Child protection and safeguarding in England: Changing and competing conceptions of risk and their implications for social work’ (2011) 41 British Journal of Social Work 854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parton, N. ‘Comparing child protection systems’ in Dolan, P. and Frost, N. (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Global Child Welfare (Routledge 2017).Google Scholar
Paskalia, V. Free Movement, Social Security and Gender in the EU (Hart Publishing 2007).Google Scholar
Pastre-Belda, B. ‘La Cour européenne des droits de l’homme, entre promotion de la subsidiarité et protection effective des droits’ (2013) Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’Homme 256.Google Scholar
Pataut, E. ‘La famille saisie par l’Union’ in Bernard, E., Cresp, M., and Ho-Dac, M. (eds), La famille dans l’ordre juridique de l’Union européenne / Family within the Legal Order of the European Union (Bruylant 2020).Google Scholar
Pech, L., and Kochenov, D., ‘Respect for the rule of law in the case law of the European Court of Justice: A casebook overview of key judgments since the Portuguese judges case’ SIEPS 2021:3 <www.sieps.se/globalassets/publikationer/2021/sieps-2021_3-eng-web.pdf?>..>Google Scholar
Pető, A. ‘Gender and illiberalism’ in Sajó, A., Uitz, R., and Holmes, S. (eds), Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism (Routledge 2021).Google Scholar
Pető, A. ‘Three readings of one law: Reregulating sexuality in Hungary’ (LSE EUROPP blog, 8 July 2021) <https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2021/07/06/three-readings-of-one-law-reregulating-sexuality-in-hungary/>..>Google Scholar
Pintens, W. ‘Family law in Europe: Developments and perspectives’ (2008) 41 The Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 155.Google Scholar
Pintens, W., and Scherpe, J. M., ‘The Marckx case: A “whole code of family law”?’ in Gilmore, S., Herring, J., and Probert, R. (eds), Landmark Cases in Family Law (Hart Publishing 2011).Google Scholar
Pohjankoski, P. ‘Rule of law with leverage: Policing structural obligations in EU law with the infringement procedure, fines, and set-off’ (2021) 58 Common Market Law Review 1341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popenoe, D. ‘American family in decline, 1960–1990: A review and appraisal’ (1993) 55 Journal of Marriage and the Family 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poppelwell-Scevak, C. ‘Oliari, Orlandi and homophobic dissenting opinions: The Strasbourg approach to the recognition of same sex marriages’ (Strasbourg Observers, 2 February 2018) <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2018/02/02/oliari-orlandi-and-homophobic-dissenting-opinions-the-strasbourg-approach-to-the-recognition-of-same-sex-marriages/>..>Google Scholar
Prechal, S., and Widdershoven, R., ‘Redefining the relationship between “Rewe-effectiveness” and effective judicial protection’ (2011) 4 Review of European Administrative Law 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puppinck, G. ‘X. and Others v. Austria (Part I): Had the woman been a man …’ (Strasbourg Observers, 4 March 2013) <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2013/03/04/x-and-others-v-austria-part-i-had-the-woman-been-a-man/>..>Google Scholar
Ragone, S., and Volpe, V., ‘An emerging right to a “gay” family life? The case Oliari v. Italy in a comparative perspective’ (2016) 17 German Law Journal 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathus, Z. ‘Social science or ‘Lego science’? Presumptions, politics, parenting and the new family law’ (2010) 10 QUT Law Review 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice (revised edition, Oxford University Press 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Réveillère, V. ‘Family rights for naturalized EU citizens: Lounes’ (2018) 55 Common Market Law Review 1855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rijpma, J. J. ‘You gotta let love move: ECJ 5 June 2018, Case C-673/16, Coman, Hamilton, Accept v. Inspectoratul General pentru Imigrări’ (2019) 15 European Constitutional Law Review 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rijpma, J. J., and Koffeman, N., ‘Free movement rights for same-sex couples under EU law: What role to play for the CJEU?’ in Gallo, D., Paladini, L., and Pustorino, P. (eds), Same-Sex Couples before National, Supranational and International Jurisdictions (Springer 2014).Google Scholar
Rodean, N. ‘Adoption and same-sex couples: New rights in European constitutional space after the ruling X and Others v. Austria’ (2014) 29 Direitos Fundamentais & Justiça 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romeo Casabona, C. M., Paslack, R., and Simon, J. W., ‘Reproductive medicine and the law: Egg donation in Germany, Spain and other European countries’ (2013) 38 Revista de Derecho y Genoma Humano 15.Google Scholar
Sajó, A., Uitz, R., and Holmes, S. (eds), Routledge Handbook of Illiberalism (Routledge 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salzberg, M. ‘The Marckx case’ (1983–1984) 13 Denver Journal for International Law and Policy 283.Google Scholar
Sata, R. ‘In the name of the family’ (Gunda Werner Institut - Heinrich Böll Stiftung 2022) <www.gwi-boell.de/en/2022/01/31/im-namen-der-familie-wie-populistinnen-ungarn-gegen-geschlechtergleichstellung>..>Google Scholar
Scheiwe, K. ‘EU law’s unequal treatment of the family: The case law of the European Court of Justice on rules prohibiting discrimination on grounds of sex and nationality’ (1994) 3 Social and Legal Studies 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherpe, J. M. ‘Zehn Jahre registrierte Partnerschaft in Dänemark - Zur Novellierung des Gesetzes von 1989’ (2000) Deutsches und Europäisches FamilienRecht 32.Google Scholar
Scherpe, J. M. ‘Erfahrungen mit dem Rechtsinstitut der registrierten Lebenspartnerschaft in Dänemark’ (2001) Familie Partnerschaft Recht 439.Google Scholar
Scherpe, J. M. ‘Gleichgeschlechtliche Lebensgemeinschaften’ in Basedow, J., Hopt, K.-J., and Zimmermann, R. (eds), Handwörterbuch des Europäischen Privatrechts (Mohr Siebeck 2009).Google Scholar
Scherpe, J. M. ‘From ‘odious crime’ to family life – Same-sex couples and the ECHR’ in Verbeke, A. and others (eds), Confronting the Frontiers of Family and Succession Law – Liber amicorum Walter Pintens (Intersentia 2012).Google Scholar
Scherpe, J. M. ‘Same-sex relationships’ in Basedow, J., Hopt, K.-J., and Zimmermann, R. (eds), Max Planck Encyclopedia of European Private Law (Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Scherpe, J. M. ‘The legal recognition of same-sex couples in Europe and the role of the European Court of Human Rights’ (2013) 10 The Equal Rights Review 83.Google Scholar
Scherpe, J. M. (ed), The Legal Status of Transsexual and Transgender Persons (Intersentia 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherpe, J. M. The Present and Future of European Family Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherpe, J. M. ‘Breaking the existing paradigms of parent–child relationships’ in Douglas, G., Murch, M., and Stephens, V. (eds), International and National Perspectives on Child and Family Law: Essays in Honour of Nigel Lowe (Intersentia 2018).Google Scholar
Scherpe, J. M. ‘Is there a ‘European Family Law’?’ (2023) 54 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherpe, J. M. ‘Marriage and the family’ in Corrias, L. and Tinnevelt, R. (eds), European Ways of Life: Legal and Philosophical Perspectives (Edward Elgar Publishing, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Scherpe, J. M., Fenton-Glynn, C., and Kaan, T. (eds), Eastern and Western Perspectives on Surrogacy (Intersentia 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherpe, J. M., and Hayward, A. (eds), The Future of Registered Partnerships – Family Recognition beyond Marriage? (Intersentia 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, M., and Bogdanowicz, P., ‘The infringement procedure in the rule of law crisis: How to make effective use of Article 258 TFEU’ (2018) 55 Common Market Law Review 1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönberger, C. ‘European citizenship as federal citizenship, some citizenship lessons of comparative federalism’ (2007) 19 European Review of Public Law 63.Google Scholar
Schütze, R. European Union Law (Cambridge University Press 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, J. The Transformation of Citizenship in the European Union (Cambridge University Press 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shenfield, F., and others, ‘Cross border reproductive care in six European countries’ (2010) 25 Human Reproduction 1367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smart, C. Personal Life: New Directions in Sociological Thinking (Polity 2007).Google Scholar
Smet, S. ‘X. and others v. Austria (Part II): A narrow ruling on a narrow issue’ (Strasbourg Observers, 6 March 2013) <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2013/03/06/x-and-others-v-austria-part-ii-a-narrow-ruling-on-a-narrow-issue/>..>Google Scholar
Smyth, C. European Asylum Law and the Rights of the Child (Routledge 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, J. ‘Do fundamental rights determine the scope of EU law?’ (2018) 43 European Law Review 475.Google Scholar
Somek, A. ‘The individualisation of liberty: Europe’s move from emancipation to empowerment’ (2013) 4 Transnational Legal Theory 258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somek, A. ‘Alienation, despair and social freedom’ in Azoulai, L., Barbou des Places, S., and Pataut, E. (eds), Constructing the Person in EU Law: Rights, Roles, Identities (Hart Publishing 2016).Google Scholar
Spaventa, E. ‘Mice or horses? British citizens in the EU 27 after Brexit as “former EU citizens”’ (2019) 44 European Law Review 589.Google Scholar
Spieker, L. D. ‘Berlaymont is back: The Commission invokes Article 2 TEU as self-standing plea in infringement proceedings over Hungarian LGBTIQ rights violations’ (EU Law Live, 22 February 2023) <https://eulawlive.com/op-ed-berlaymont-is-back-the-commission-invokes-article-2-teu-as-self-standing-plea-in-infringement-proceedings-over-hungarian-lgbtiq-rights-violations-by-luke-dimitrios-spieker/>..>Google Scholar
Spratt, T., and others, ‘Child protection in Europe: Development of an international cross-comparison model to inform national policies and practices’ (2015) 45 British Journal of Social Work 1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stacey, J. Brave New Families: Stories of Domestic Upheaval in Late Twentieth Century America (Basic Books 1990).Google Scholar
Stalford, H. ‘Concepts of family under EU law – Lessons from the ECHR’ (2002) 16 International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stalford, H. Children and the European Union: Rights, Welfare and Accountability (Hart Publishing 2012).Google Scholar
Stalford, H. ‘The UK referendum on membership of the EU: Whither social welfare and family law?’ (2016) 38 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stehlík, V. ‘The CJEU crossing the Rubicon on the same-sex marriages? Commentary on Coman case’ (2018) 18 International and Comparative Law Review 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, C. ‘Persuasive definitions’ (1938) 47 Mind 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stöckl, K. ‘The European culture wars’ (ZOiS Spotlight 13/19, 3 April 2019) <https://en.zois-berlin.de/publications/zois-spotlight/archiv-2019/the-european-culture-wars>..>Google Scholar
Strumia, F. ‘The family in EU law after the SM ruling: Variable geometry and conditional deference’ (2019) 4 European Papers 389.Google Scholar
Sturm, F. ‘Das Straßburger Marckx-Urteil zum Recht des nichtehelichen Kindes und seine Folgen’ (1982) Zeitschrift für das gesamte Familienrecht 1151.Google Scholar
Swennen, F. ‘Motherhoods and the law’ in Willekens, H. and others (eds), Motherhood and the Law (Göttingen University Press 2019).Google Scholar
Szikra, D. ‘Democracy and welfare in hard times: The social policy of the Orbán Government in Hungary between 2010 and 2014’ (2014) 24 Journal of European Social Policy 486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szikra, D., and Szelewa, D., ‘Do Central and Eastern European countries fit the “Western” picture? The example of family policies in Hungary and Poland’ in Klenner, C. and Leiber, S. (eds), Welfare States and Gender Inequality in Central and Eastern Europe: Continuity and Post‐socialist Transformation in the EU Member States (European Trade Union Institute 2010).Google Scholar
Takács, J., Fobear, K., and Schmitsek, S., ‘Resisting genderphobia in Hungary’ (2022) 10 Politics and Governance 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thienpont, D., and Willems, G., ‘Le droit à la libre circulation des familles homoparentales consacré par la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne’ (2022) 132 Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’Homme 925.Google Scholar
Thompson, L. ‘Impossible expectations? Abused mothers’ experiences of the child protection and family court systems’ (2020) 32 Child and Family Law Quarterly 31.Google Scholar
Thym, D., and Zoetewij-Turhan, M. H., ‘Introduction: Free movement between membership and partnership’ in Thym, D. and Zoetewij-Turhan, M. H. (eds.), Rights of Third-Country Nationals under EU Association Agreements (Brill 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmer, A. ‘S.H. and Others v Austria: Margin of appreciation and IVF’ (Strasbourg Observers, 9 November 2011) <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2011/11/09/s-h-and-others-v-austria-margin-of-appreciation-and-ivf/>..>Google Scholar
Tobler, C. ‘Equality and non-discrimination under the ECHR and EU law: A comparison focusing on discrimination against LGBTI persons’ (2014) 74 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 521.Google Scholar
Tobler, C. ‘Free movement of persons in the EU v. in the EEA: Of effect-related homogeneity and a reversed Polydor principle’ (2018) 3 European Papers 1429.Google Scholar
Todorova, V. ‘Gender wars in Bulgaria’ in Scherpe, J. M. and Gilmore, S. (eds), Family Matters – Essays in Honour of John Eekelaar (Intersentia 2022).Google Scholar
Torres Pérez, A. Conflicts of Rights in the European Union – A Theory of Supranational Adjudication (Oxford University Press 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres Pérez, A. ‘Rights and powers in the European Union: Towards a Charter that is fully applicable to the Member States’ (2020) 22 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tóth, O., and Dupcsik, C., ‘Trust in people and conservatism of family and gender roles in Hungary and in some other European countries’ (2011) 1 Journal of Intimate and Public Spheres 152.Google Scholar
Trimmings, K., Shakargy, S., and Achmad, C. (eds), Research Handbook on Surrogacy and the Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2024).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tryfonidou, A. ‘(Further) signs of a turn of the tide in the CJEU’s citizenship jurisprudence: Case C-40/11, Iida, Judgment of 8 November 2012’ (2013) 20 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 302.Google Scholar
Tryfonidou, A. ‘Another failed opportunity for the effective protection of LGB rights under EU law: Dr David. L. Parris v. Trinity College Dublin and Others’ (EU Law Analysis, 1 December 2016) <http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2016/12/another-failed-opportunity-for.html>..>Google Scholar
Tryfonidou, A. ‘EU free movement law and the children of rainbow families: Children of a lesser god?’ (2019) 38 Yearbook of European Law 220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tryfonidou, A. ‘The ECJ recognises the right of same-sex spouses to move freely between EU Member States: The Coman ruling’ (2019) 44 European Law Review 663.Google Scholar
Tryfonidou, A. ‘Law and sexual minority rights in the EU: Navigating a political minefield’ in Cardwell, P. and Granger, M.-P. (eds), Research Handbook on the Politics of EU Law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2020).Google Scholar
Tryfonidou, A. ‘Positive state obligations under European law: A tool for achieving substantive equality for sexual minorities in Europe’ (2020) 13 Erasmus Law Review 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tryfonidou, A. ‘The cross-border recognition of the parent–child relationship in rainbow families under EU law: A critical view of the ECJ’s V.M.A. Ruling’ (European Law Blog, 21 December 2021) <https://europeanlawblog.eu/2021/12/21/the-cross-border-recognition-of-the-parent-child-relationship-in-rainbow-families-under-eu-law-a-critical-view-of-the-ecjs-v-m-a-ruling/>.CrossRef.>Google Scholar
Tryfonidou, A. ‘The ECJ recognises the right of rainbow families to move freely between EU Member States: The V.M.A. ruling’ (2022) 47 European Law Review 534.Google Scholar
Tryfonidou, A. ‘The impact of right-wing populism on the family rights of sexual minorities in Europe’ (2022) EU-POP Working Paper Series 2.Google Scholar
Tryfonidou, A. ‘Cross-border recognition of parenthood in the EU: Comments on the Commission proposal of 7 December’ (2023) 24 ERA Forum 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tryfonidou, A. ‘Surrogacy in the ECHR and the European institutions’ in Trimmings, K., Shakargy, S., and Achmad, C. (eds), Research Handbook on Surrogacy and the Law (Edward Elgar Publishing forthcoming).Google Scholar
Vaige, L. Cross-Border Recognition of Formalized Same-Sex Relationships (Intersentia 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Eijken, H. EU Citizenship and the Constitutionalisation of the European Union (Europa Law Publishing 2015).Google Scholar
Van Hoof, W., and Pennings, G., ‘Extraterritorial laws for cross-border reproductive care: The issue of legal diversity’ (2012) 19 European Journal of Health Law 187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Hoof, W., and Pennings, G., ‘The consequences of S.H. and Others v Austria for legislation on gamete donation in Europe: an ethical analysis of the European Court of Human Rights judgments’ (2012) 25 Reproductive BioMedicine Online 667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Middelaar, L. The Passage to Europe: How a Continent Became a Union (Yale University Press 2014).Google Scholar
von Bogdandy, A., and Spieker, L. D., ‘Countering the judicial silencing of critics: Article 2 TEU values, reverse Solange, and the responsibilities of national judges’ (2019) 15 European Constitutional Law Review 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waaldijk, K. ‘The gender-neutrality of the International Right to Marry: Same-sex couples may still be excluded from marriage, but their exclusion – and their foreign marriages – must be recognised’ (23 July 2018) <https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3218308>..>Google Scholar
Waaldijk, K. ‘Small change: How the road to same-sex marriage got paved in the Netherlands’ in Wintemute, R. and Andenæs, M. (eds), Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Partnerships: A Study of National, European, and International Law (Hart Publishing 2001) 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walklate, S., and Mythen, G. ‘Beyond risk theory: Experiential knowledge and “knowing otherwise”’ (2011) 11 Criminology and Criminal Justice 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, J. ‘Editorial: Does the European Union truly need a Charter of Rights?’ (2000) 6 European Law Journal 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, S., and Mythen, G., ‘Disentangling practitioners’ understandings of child sexual exploitation: The risks of assuming otherwise?’ (2022) 22 Criminology and Criminal Justice 618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willekens, H. ‘Motherhood as a legal institution: A historical-sociological introduction’ in Willekens, H. and others (eds), Motherhood and the Law (Göttingen University Press 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willems, G. ‘Orientation sexuelle et adoption: L’Autriche condamnée par la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme’ (2013) Revue trimestrielle des droits de l’homme 1037.Google Scholar
Willems, G. ‘Droits de l’homme et procréation médicalement assistée: La Cour de Strasbourg face aux évolutions biomédicales et aux mutations de la filiation’ in Massager, N., Procréation médicalement assistée et gestation pour autrui: Regards croisés du droit et de la pratique médicale (Anthemis 2017).Google Scholar
Willems, G. ‘Le droit au regroupement familial des époux homosexuels consacré par la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne’ (2018) La semaine juridique (édition générale).Google Scholar
Williams, R. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society (Croom Helm 1976).Google Scholar
Wollenschläger, F. ‘A new fundamental freedom beyond market integration: Union citizenship and its dynamics for shifting the economic paradigm of European integration’ (2011) 17 European Law Journal 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, L. ‘Family rights in the EU – Disadvantaging the disadvantaged?’ (1999) 11 Child and Family Law Quarterly 17.Google Scholar
Wright, M. ‘Working the international child protection case: A snapshot of local authorities’ experiences within an evolving legal context’ (2019) 41 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuval-Davis, N. ‘Gender and nation’ (1997) 16 Ethnic and Racial Studies 621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimanyi, E. ‘Family b/Orders: Hungary’s campaign for the “Family Protection Action Plan”’ (2020) 20 Feminist Media Studies 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×