Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:40:42.910Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false

2 - The Promotion of Resilience in the Face of Adversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Michael Rutter
Affiliation:
Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, U.K.
Alison Clarke-Stewart
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Judy Dunn
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London
Get access

Summary

Resilience is a concept that suggests that some individuals have a relatively good psychological outcome despite suffering risk experiences that would be expected to bring about serious sequelae. In other words, resilience implies relative resistance to environmental risk experiences, or the overcoming of stress or adversity. It is not strictly social competence or positive mental health. Essentially, it is an interactive concept that involves the combination of serious risk experiences and a relatively positive psychological outcome despite those experiences (Cicchetti, Rogosch, Lynch, & Holt, 1993; Luthar, 2003; Masten, Best, Garmezy, 1990; Masten, 2001; Rutter, 1985; Rutter, 1987; Rutter, 1990; Rutter, 1999; Rutter, 2000a; Rutter, 2003; Werner & Smith, 1982; 1992).

RESILIENCE AND CONCEPTS OF RISK AND PROTECTION

Extensive research has been conducted into risk and protection factors as they operate in relation to the development of psychopathology (see Sameroff, Chapter 3 in this book). The findings show that, although the risk effects of most individual experiences are quite small, their cumulative effect may be great. To a considerable extent, adverse outcomes can be predicted on the basis of the overall number of risk factors (Fergusson, Horwood & Lynskey, 1994; Rutter, 1978; Williams, Anderson, McFie & Silva, 1990). It is therefore necessary to ask whether the concept of resilience is just a fancy way of reinventing the old and well-established concepts of risk and protection. Clearly, this is not the case.

Type
Chapter
Information
Families Count
Effects on Child and Adolescent Development
, pp. 26 - 52
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×