Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:50:32.783Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 2 - Engaged Scholarship

Navigating the Role of Research in Extension Using a Relationship Education Case Example

from Part I - Overview of Extension and the Social Sciences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2024

By
J. Kale Monk
Edited by
Maria Rosario T. de Guzman  and
Holly Hatton
Maria Rosario T. de Guzman
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Lincoln
Holly Hatton
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska, Lincoln
Get access

Summary

The overarching purpose of Extension is to facilitate the application of science to the broader public. To achieve this goal, the information we disseminate must be accurate, relevant, socially just, and beneficial, which requires rigorous evaluation to ensure (Braverman & Arnold, 2008; Monk et al., 2021). In this chapter, I demonstrate the complementarity of Extension and the process of research and evaluation by outlining the relevance of Extension as a (a) research-informed, (b) evidence-based, (c) culturally relevant, (d) interdisciplinary, and (e) public-scholarship enterprise. To illustrate each of these qualities of Extension, I will describe the ongoing development of a relationship-science dissemination program, Relevate. In its over 100 years of existence, Extension has been at the forefront of community-engaged, translational and transformative scholarship. The landscape of Extension has changed over time. However, shifts and challenges in engagement work can also represent new opportunities to be responsive and innovative. Extension is well positioned to continue carrying bringing research to the community and conducting impactful, innovative, and engaged scholarship.

Keywords

Evaluationpublic scholarshipengagementtranslational scienceapplied researchcommunity engagement
Type
Chapter
Information
Extension Education and the Social Sciences
Uplifting Children, Youth, Families, and Communities
 , pp. 15 - 39
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, L. S., & Moio, J. A. (2009). Critical race theory and the cultural competence dilemma in social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 45(2), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2009.200700109Google Scholar
Adams, B. L., Cain, H. R., Giraud, V., & Stedman, N. L. (2012). Leadership, motivation, and teamwork behaviors of principal investigator’s in interdisciplinary teams: A Synthesis of research. Journal of Leadership Education, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.12806/V11/I2/TF2Google Scholar
Adler-Baeder, F., & Hawkins, A. J. (2010). Relationship and marriage education for diverse, lower-income couples. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 9(2), 93–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691003694869Google Scholar
Adler‐Baeder, F., Higginbotham, B., & Lamke, L. (2004). Putting empirical knowledge to work: Linking research and programming on marital quality. Family Relations, 53(5), 537–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0197-6664.2004.00063.xGoogle Scholar
Adler‐Baeder, F., Kerpelman, J. L., Schramm, D. G., Higginbotham, B., & Paulk, A. (2007). The impact of relationship education on adolescents of diverse backgrounds. Family Relations, 56(3), 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00460.xGoogle Scholar
Amato, P. R. (2010). Research on divorce: Continuing trends and new developments. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 650–666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00723.xGoogle Scholar
American Hospital Association. (2013). Becoming a culturally competent health care organization. aha.org. www.aha.org/ahahret-guides/2013-06-18-becoming-culturally-competent-health-care-organizationGoogle Scholar
Applebee, G. (2000). Cooperative Extension. In Wilson, A. & Hayes, E. (Eds.), Handbook of adult and continuing education (pp. 408–422). Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Arnold, M. E. (2006). Developing evaluation capacity in extension 4-H field faculty: A framework for success. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140062879Google Scholar
Arnold, M. E., & Rennekamp, R. A. (2020). A time like no other: 4-H youth development and COVID-19. Journal of Extension, 58(3), v58-3comm1.Google Scholar
Arya, M., Kumar, D., Patel, S., StreetJr, R. L., Giordano, T. P., & Viswanath, K. (2014). Mitigating HIV health disparities: the promise of mobile health for a patient-initiated solution. American Journal of Public Health, 104(12), 2251–2255. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302120Google Scholar
Bamka, W., Komar, S., Melendez, M., & Infante-Casella, M. (2020). “Ask the Ag Agent” weekly webinar series: Agriculture-focused response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Extension, 58(4), v58–4tt2.Google Scholar
Beaulieu, M., Breton, M., & Brousselle, A. (2018). Conceptualizing 20 years of engaged scholarship: A scoping review. PloS One, 13(2), e0193201. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193201Google Scholar
Bell, M., & LewisJr, N. (2023). Universities claim to value community-engaged scholarship: So why do they discourage it? Public Understanding of Science, 32(3), 304–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221118779Google Scholar
Besley, J. C., Newman, T. P., Dudo, A., & Tiffany, L. A. (2020). Exploring scholars’ public engagement goals in Canada and the United States. Public Understanding of Science, 29(8), 855–867. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520950671Google Scholar
Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 579–616. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030Google Scholar
Borich, T. O. (2001). The Department of Housing and Urban Development and Cooperative Extension: A case for urban collaboration. Journal of Extension, 39(6), 6FEA2.Google Scholar
Braverman, M. T., & Arnold, M. E. (2008). An evaluator’s balancing act: Making decisions about methodological rigor. In Braverman, M. T., Engle, M., Arnold, M. E., & Rennekamp, R. A. (Eds.), Program evaluation in a complex organizational system: Lessons from Cooperative Extension (pp. 71–86). New Directions for Evaluation, 120. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Brooks, J. E., Ogolsky, B. G., & Monk, J. K. (2018). Commitment in interracial relationships: Dyadic and longitudinal tests of the investment model. Journal of Family Issues, 39(9), 2685–2708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X18758343Google Scholar
Bruns, K., & Franz, N. K. (2015). Cooperative Extension program development and the community-university engagement movement: Perspectives from two lifelong Extension professionals. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 3(2), 156–169.Google Scholar
Colbeck, C. L., & Wharton-Michael, P. (2006). Individual and organizational influences on faculty members engagement in public scholarship. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 105, 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.220Google Scholar
Curtis, K., Fry, M., Shaban, R. Z., & Considine, J. (2017). Translating research findings to clinical nursing practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(5–6), 862–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13586Google Scholar
DiClemente, R. J., Crosby, R. A., & Kegler, M. C. (Eds.). (2009). Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Diem, K. G., Hino, J., Martin, D., & Meisenbach, T. (2011). Is extension ready to adopt technology for delivering programs and reaching new audiences? Journal of Extension, 49(6), v49–6a1.Google Scholar
Dunifon, R., Duttweiler, M., Pillemer, K., Tobias, D., & Trochim, W. M. (2004). Evidence-based extension. Journal of Extension, 42(2), 2FEA2.Google Scholar
Duttweiler, M. W. (2008). The value of evaluation in Cooperative Extension. In Braverman, M. T., Engle, M., Arnold, M. E., & Rennekamp, R. A. (Eds.), Program evaluation in a complex organizational system: Lessons from Cooperative Extension (pp. 87–100). New Directions for Evaluation, 120. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Fehlis, C. P. (1992). Urban extension programs. Journal of Extension, 30(2), 2FEA3.Google Scholar
Fetsch, R. J., MacPhee, D., & Boyer, L. K. (2012). Evidence-based programming: What is a process an extension agent can use to evaluate a program’s effectiveness. Journal of Extension, 50(5), 5FEA2.Google Scholar
Fincham, F. D., Stanley, S. M., & Rhoades, G. (2011). Relationship education in emerging adulthood: Problems and prospects. In Fincham, F. D. & Cui, M. (Eds.), Romantic relationships in emerging adulthood (pp. 293–316). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, J. (2017). What is unique about Extension personnel in the city? Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 5(2), 22–36.Google Scholar
Fox, S., & Duggan, M. (2012). Mobile health 2012. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from www.pewinternet.org/2012/11/08/mobile-health-2012/Google Scholar
Fox, S., & Duggan, M. (2013). Tracking for health. Pew research Center’s internet & American life project. Retrieved from www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/28/tracking-for-health/Google Scholar
Franz, N. K. (2014). Measuring and articulating the value of community engagement: Lessons learned from 100 years of Cooperative Extension work. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 18(2), 5–16.Google Scholar
Franz, N. K. (2015). Programming for the public good: Ensuring public value through the Cooperative Extension program development model. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 3(2), 13–25.Google Scholar
Franz, N. K., Arnold, M., & Baughman, S. (2014). The role of evaluation in determining the public value of Extension. Journal of Extension, 52(4), 4COM3.Google Scholar
Franz, N. K., Brekke, R., Coates, D. M., Kress, C., & Hlas, J. M. (2014). The virtual Extension annual conference: Addressing contemporary professional development needs. Journal of Extension, 52(1), 1TOT1.Google Scholar
Franz, N. K., Garst, B. A., & Gagnon, R. J. (2015). The Cooperative Extension program development model: Adapting to a changing context. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 3(2), 3–12.Google Scholar
Franz, N., & Townson, L. (2008). The nature of complex organizations: The case for Cooperative Extension. In Braverman, M. T., Engle, M., Arnold, M. E., & Rennekamp, R. A. (Eds.), Program evaluation in a complex organizational system: Lessons from Cooperative Extension (pp. 5–14). New Directions for Evaluation, 120. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Futris, T. G., Adler-Baeder, F., & Dean, K. J. (2004). Using technology to link researchers and educators: Evaluation of electronic conferencing. Journal of Extension, 42(1), 1RIB1.Google Scholar
Gagnon, R. J., Franz, N. K., Garst, B. A., & Bumpus, M. F. (2015). Factors impacting program delivery: The importance of implementation research in Extension. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 3(2), 68–82.Google Scholar
Gagnon, R. J., Garst, B. A., & Franz, N. K. (2015). Looking ahead: Envisioning the future of the Extension program development model. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 3(2), 170–176.Google Scholar
Garst, B. A., Baughman, S., & Franz, N. K. (2014). Benchmarking professional development practices across youth-serving organizations: Implications for Extension. Journal of Extension, 52(5), 5FEA2.Google Scholar
Garst, B. A., & McCawley, P. F. (2015). Solving problems, ensuring relevance, and facilitating change: The evolution of needs assessment within Cooperative Extension. Journal of Human Sciences and Extension, 3(2), 26–46.Google Scholar
Go, C., & Murdock, S. (2003). To bully-proof or not to bully-proof: That is the question. Journal of Extension, 41(2), 2RIB1.Google Scholar
Gottman, J., & Gottman, J. (2017). The natural principles of love. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 9(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12182Google Scholar
Grzanka, P. R., & Cole, E. R. (2021). An argument for bad psychology: Disciplinary disruption, public engagement, and social transformation. American Psychologist, 76(8), 1334. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000853Google Scholar
Hamilton, S. F., Chen, E. K., Pillemer, K., & Meador, R. H. (2013). Research use by Cooperative Extension educators in New York state. Journal of Extension, 51(3), 3FEA2.Google Scholar
Hawkins, A. J., Blanchard, V. L., Baldwin, S. A., & Fawcett, E. B. (2008). Does marriage and relationship education work? A meta-analytic study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(5), 723–734. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012584Google Scholar
Hawkins, A. J., & Ooms, T. (2010). What works in marriage and relationship education? A review of lessons learned with a focus on low-income couples. National Healthy Marriage Resource Center.Google Scholar
Hill, L. G., & Parker, L. A. (2005). Extension as a delivery system for prevention programming: Capacity, barriers, and opportunities. Journal of Extension, 43(1), 1FEA1.Google Scholar
Holt-Lunstad, J., Robles, T. F., & Sbarra, D. A. (2017). Advancing social connection as a public health priority in the United States. American Psychologist, 72(6), 517. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000103Google Scholar
Hong, Y. R., Lawrence, J., WilliamsJr, D., & Mainous Iii, A. (2020). Population-level interest and telehealth capacity of US hospitals in response to COVID-19: Cross-sectional analysis of Google search and national hospital survey data. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 6(2), e18961. https://doi.org/10.2196/18961Google Scholar
Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., Becker, A. B., Allen, A. A., & Guzman, J. R. (2003). Critical issues in developing and following community-based participatory research principles. In Minkler, M. & Wallerstein, N. (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health (pp. 53–76). Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Iverson, S. V. (2008). Now is the time for change: Reframing diversity planning at Land-Grant Universities. Journal of Extension, 46(1), 1FEA3.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. D. (2012). Healthy marriage initiatives: On the need for empiricism in policy implementation. American Psychologist, 67(4), 296–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027743Google Scholar
Johnson, M. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (2015). Contributions of social learning theory to the promotion of healthy relationships: Asset or liability? Journal of Family Theory & Review, 7(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12057Google Scholar
Kaplan, M., Liu, S. T., & Radhakrishna, R. (2003). Intergenerational programming in Extension: Needs assessment as planning tool. Journal of Extension, 41(4), 4FEA5.Google Scholar
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Wilson, S. J. (2017). Lovesick: How couples’ relationships influence health. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 13, 421–443. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045111Google Scholar
Kim, E. S., Cao, C., Wang, Y., & Nguyen, D. T. (2017). Measurement invariance testing with many groups: A comparison of five approaches. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(4), 524–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1304822Google Scholar
Kim, Y. B., Bowers, J. R., Martin, S., Ebata, A., Lindsey, S. C., Nelson, P. T., & Ontai, L. (2015). Process monitoring evaluation of an online program for parents. Journal of Extension, 53(2), 2RIB2.Google Scholar
King, N. J., & Coosky, L. J. (2008). Evaluating multilevel programs. In Braverman, M. T., Engle, M., Arnold, M. E., & Rennekamp, R. A. (Eds.), Program evaluation in a complex organizational system: Lessons from Cooperative Extension (pp. 27–39). New Directions for Evaluation, 120. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Lamm, A. J., Israel, G. D., & Diehl, D. (2013). A national perspective on the current evaluation activities in Extension. Journal of Extension, 51(1), 1FEA1.Google Scholar
Lichter, D. T. (2012). Immigration and the new racial diversity in rural America. Rural Sociology, 77(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2012.00070.xGoogle Scholar
Martin, S. S., Feldman, D. I., Blumenthal, R. S., Jones, S. R., Post, W. S., McKibben, R. A., … Blaha, M. J. (2015). mActive: A randomized clinical trial of an automated mHealth intervention for physical activity promotion. Journal of the American Heart Association, 4(11), e002239. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002239Google Scholar
McDowell, G. (2004). Is Extension an idea whose time has come – And gone. Journal of Extension, 42(6), 6COM1.Google Scholar
Mincemoyer, C., Perkins, D., Ang, P. M. M., Greenberg, M. T., Spoth, R. L., Redmond, C., & Feinberg, M. (2008). Improving the reputation of cooperative extension as a source of prevention education for youth and families: The effects of the PROSPER model. Journal of Extension, 46(1), 1FEA6.Google Scholar
Molgaard, V. K. (1997). The extension service as key mechanism for research and services delivery for prevention of mental health disorders in rural areas. American Journal of Community Psychology, 25(4), 515–544. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024611706598Google Scholar
Monk, J. K. (in press). Changing dynamics after divorce: Evaluation of a co-parent education program. Journal of Extension.Google Scholar
Monk, J. K., Benson, J. J., & Bordere, T. C. (2019). Public scholarship: A tool for strengthening relationships across Extension, campus, and community. Journal of Extension, 57(3), 3TOT1.Google Scholar
Monk, J. K., Benson, J. J., Bordere, T. C. & Vennum, A. V. (2020). Creating change through public scholarship. Webinars available through the National Council on Family Relations at www.ncfr.org/events/creating-change-through-public-scholarship-part-1-2Google Scholar
Monk, J. K., Bordere, T. C., & Benson, J. J. (2021). Emerging Ideas. Advancing Family Science through public scholarship: Fostering community relationships and engaging in broader impacts. Family Relations, 70(5), 1612–1625. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12545Google Scholar
Monk, J. K., & Ogolsky, B. G. (2019). Contextual relational uncertainty model: Understanding ambiguity in a changing sociopolitical context of marriage. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 11(2), 243–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12325Google Scholar
Monk, J. K., Ruhlmann, L., Nelson Goff, B. S., Ogan, M., & Miller, M. B. (2022). Translating Discovery Science. Fostering relationships: Service provider perspectives on community building among veteran families. Family Relations, 72, 1351–1367. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12724Google Scholar
Monk, J. K., Vennum, A. V., & Kanter, J. B. (2019). How to use crowdfunding in Extension: A relationship education example. Journal of Extension, 57(4), 4TOT3.Google Scholar
Myers‐Walls, J. A., Ballard, S. M., Darling, C. A., & Myers‐Bowman, K. S. (2011). Reconceptualizing the domain and boundaries of family life education. Family Relations, 60(4), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2011.00659.xGoogle Scholar
Ogolsky, B. G., Monk, J. K., Rice, T. M., Theisen, J. C., & Maniotes, C. R. (2017). Relationship maintenance: A review of research on romantic relationships. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 9(3), 275–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12205Google Scholar
Olson, J. R., Welsh, J. A., & Perkins, D. F. (2015). Evidence-based programming within Cooperative Extension: How can we maintain program fidelity while adapting to meet local needs? Journal of Extension, 53(3), 3FEA3.Google Scholar
Page, C. S., & Kern, M. A. (2018). Creating and implementing diverse development strategies to support Extension centers and programs. Journal of Extension, 56(1), Article 1FEA4.Google Scholar
Patton, M. Q. (2008). Sup wit eval ext? In Braverman, M. T., Engle, M., Arnold, M. E., & Rennekamp, R. A. (Eds.), Program evaluation in a complex organizational system: Lessons from Cooperative Extension (pp. 101–116). New Directions for Evaluation, 120. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Percheski, C., & Hargittai, E. (2011). Health information-seeking in the digital age. Journal of American College Health, 59(5), 379–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2010.513406Google Scholar
Perkins, D. F., Chilenski, S. M., Olson, J. R., Mincemoyer, C. C., & Spoth, R. (2014). Knowledge, attitudes, and commitment concerning evidence-based prevention programs: Differences between family and consumer sciences and 4-H youth development educators. Journal of Extension, 52(3), 3FEA6.Google Scholar
PEW Research Center. (2019). Mobile fact sheet. www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/Google Scholar
Reed, M. S., & Rudman, H. (2023). Re-thinking research impact: Voice, context and power at the interface of science, policy and practice. Sustainability Science, 18(2), 967–981.Google Scholar
Schauber, A. C., & Castania, K. (2001). Facing issues of diversity: Rebirthing the Extension Service. Journal of Extension, 39(6), 6COM2.Google Scholar
Sellers, D. M., Schainker, L. M., Lockhart, P. A., & Yeh, H. C. (2017). Establishing a common language: The meaning of research based and evidence-based programming (in the Human Sciences). Journal of Extension, 55(6), 6FEA2.Google Scholar
Selwyn, N., Gorard, S., & Furlong, J. (2006). Adult learning in the digital age: Information technology and the learning society. Routledge.Google Scholar
Sevin, C., Moore, G., Shepherd, J., Jacobs, T., & Hupke, C. (2009). Transforming care teams to provide the best possible patient-centered, collaborative care. The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management, 32(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JAC.0000343121.07844.e0Google Scholar
Shamblen, S. R., Gluck, A., Wubbenhorst, W., & Collins, D. A. (2018). The economic benefits of marriage and family strengthening programs. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 39(3), 386–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-018-9565-8Google Scholar
Sharfstein, J. M. (2016). Banishing “stakeholders.” The Milbank Quarterly, 94(3), 476.Google Scholar
Shelton, D. (2008). Establishing the public’s trust through community-based participatory research: A case example to improve health care for a rural Hispanic community. Annual Review of Nursing Research, 26(1), 237–259.Google Scholar
Small, S. A., Cooney, S. M., & O’connor, C. (2009). Evidence‐informed program improvement: Using principles of effectiveness to enhance the quality and impact of family‐based prevention programs. Family Relations, 58(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00530.xGoogle Scholar
Spoth, R., Franz, N., & Brennan, A. (2020, July). Strengthening the power of evidence-based prevention in Cooperative Extension: A capacity-building framework for translation science-driven behavioral health. Child & Youth Care Forum. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-020-09559-0Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M., Allen, E. S., Markman, H. J., Rhoades, G. K., & Prentice, D. L. (2010). Decreasing divorce in US Army couples: Results from a randomized controlled trial using PREP for Strong Bonds. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 9(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691003694901Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M., Markman, H. J., Prado, L. M., Olmos Gallo, P. A., Tonelli, L., St. Peters, M., … Whitton, S. W. (2001). Community-based premarital prevention: Clergy and lay leaders on the front lines. Family Relations, 50, 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00067.xGoogle Scholar
Stanley, S. M., Rhoades, G. K., Loew, B. A., Allen, E. S., Carter, S., Osborne, L. J., … Markman, H. J. (2014). A randomized controlled trial of relationship education in the US Army: 2‐year outcomes. Family Relations, 63(4), 482–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12083Google Scholar
Stephenson, G. (2003). The somewhat flawed theoretical foundation of the extension service. Journal of Extension, 41(4), 4FEA1.Google Scholar
Taylor-Powell, E., & Boyd, H. H. (2008). Evaluation capacity building in complex organizations. In Braverman, M. T., Engle, M., Arnold, M. E., & Rennekamp, R. A. (Eds.), Program evaluation in a complex organizational system: Lessons from Cooperative Extension (pp. 55–69). New Directions for Evaluation, 120. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
The Connector. (2020). Retrieved from https://theconnector.missouri.edu/who-we-are/Google Scholar
Tozzi, A. E., Carloni, E., Gesualdo, F., Russo, L., & Raponi, M. (2015). Attitude of families of patients with genetic diseases to use m-health technologies. Telemedicine and e-Health, 21(2), 86–89. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2014.0080Google Scholar
Vennum, A., Monk, J. K., Pasley, B. K., & Fincham, F. D. (2017). Emerging adult relationship transitions as opportune times for tailored interventions. Emerging Adulthood, 5, 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696817705020Google Scholar
Warren, M. R., Calderón, J., Kupscznk, L. A., Squires, G., & Su, C. (2018). Is collaborative, community-engaged scholarship more rigorous than traditional scholarship? On advocacy, bias, and social science research. Urban Education, 53(4), 445–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085918763511Google Scholar
We are Social. (2019). https://wearesocial.com/us/digital-2019-usGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. T. (1996). The on-going farm crisis: Extension leadership in rural communities. Journal of Extension, 34(1), 1FEA3.Google Scholar
Yang, R. K., Fetsch, R. J., McBride, T. M., & Benavente, J. C. (2009). Assessing public opinion directly to keep current with changing community needs. Journal of Extension, 47(3), 3FEA6.Google Scholar
Yapa, L. (2006). Public scholarship in the postmodern university. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 105, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.226Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×