Book contents
- Expressivity in European Languages
- Expressivity in European Languages
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction
- Uralic
- 2 Hypocoristic reduplications and embellished clippings in Hungarian and elsewhere
- 3 Reduplication in Finno-Ugric languages
- Germanic
- Hellenic
- Romance
- Celtic
- Vasconian
- Caucasian
- Comparative
- Index
- References
3 - Reduplication in Finno-Ugric languages
from Uralic
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 August 2023
Edited by
Book contents
- Expressivity in European Languages
- Expressivity in European Languages
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction
- Uralic
- 2 Hypocoristic reduplications and embellished clippings in Hungarian and elsewhere
- 3 Reduplication in Finno-Ugric languages
- Germanic
- Hellenic
- Romance
- Celtic
- Vasconian
- Caucasian
- Comparative
- Index
- References
Summary
The chapter provides a general overview of lexical reduplication in Finno-Ugric languages. The research data are taken from observations of everyday life and from various written sources for major languages of this family: Finnic (Finnish, Estonian), Saamic, Mordvinic (Erzya, Moksha), Mari, Permic (Komi, Udmurt), Ugric (Hungarian, Mansi, Khanty). Finno-Ugric reduplication is rich, because, on one hand, agglutinative properties of these languages favor mergeability and repetition of various stems; on the other hand, many onomatopoeias and descriptive words (ideophones) can function as various parts of speech, mainly as adverbs and adjectives, which are often repeated. They also sometimes complete nouns or verbs. Repetitive constructions can express various semantic shades, mainly intensification, iterativity, distributivity, multiplicity, frequency, or indefiniteness. Finno-Ugric reduplication is total or partial (which is more frequent). Reduplicative tendencies are more visible and productive in Hungarian, Komi, Udmurt, and Mari, than in Saamic, in which they barely exist.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Expressivity in European Languages , pp. 53 - 88Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Ahlqvist, A. (1894). Wogulische Sprachtexte nebst Entwurf einer wogulischen Grammatik, Wichmann, Yrjö (ed.). Helsinki: SKS.Google Scholar
Asztalos, E., Gulyás, N. F., Horváth, L., & Timár, B. (2021). New aspects in the study of Mari, Udmurt, and Komi-Permyak: The typological database of the Volga area Finno-Ugric languages. In Szeverényi, S. (ed.) Uralic Studies, Languages, and Researchers. Studia Uralo-altaica, Vol. 54. Szeged: University of Szeged, 255–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14232/sua.2021.54.255-274Google Scholar
Bartens, R. (1999). Mordvalaisten kielten rakenne ja kehitys. Helsinki: Suomalais-ugrilainen seura.Google Scholar
Bartens, R. (2000). Permiläisten kielten rakenne ja kehitys. Helsinki: Suomalais-ugrilainen seura.Google Scholar
Baxtijarova, T. P. & Dinislamova, S. S. (Бахтиярова, Т.П. & Динисламова, C.C.) (2016). Мансийско-Русский Словарь (Верхне-Лозьвинский Диалект) [Mansijsko-russkij slovar’ (verxne loz’vinskij dialekt)]. Tyumen: Format.Google Scholar
BKR (2020). Большой Коми–Русский Словарь. [Bol’šoj komi-russkij slovar’ ] [Great Komi–Russian dictionary]. Institute of Language, Literature and History, Federal Research Centre Komi Scientific Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. https://dict.fu-lab.ru/dict?id=5109Google Scholar
BMR (2020). Большой Марийско–Русский Словарь. [Bol’šoj marijsko-russkij slovar’] [Great Mari–Russian dictionary]. Mari Research Institute of Language, Literature and History. https://dict.fu-lab.ru/dict?id=37767Google Scholar
BUR (2020). Большой Удмуртско–Русский Словарь. [Bol’šoj udmurtsko-russkij slovar’] [Great Udmurt–Russian dictionary]. Udmurt Institute of History, Language and Literature of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. https://dict.fu-lab.ru/dict?id=129449Google Scholar
Bradley, J., Riese, T., & Guseva, E. (2014). Mari–English Dictionary. Vienna: University of Vienna. https://mari-language.univie.ac.atGoogle Scholar
Brdar, M. & Brdar-Szabó, R. (2014). Syntactic reduplicative constructions in Hungarian (and elsewhere): Categorization, topicalization and concessivity rolled into one. In Rundblad, G. et al. (eds.) Selected Papers from the 4th UK Cognitive Linguistics Conference. London: UK Cognitive Linguistics Association, 36–51.Google Scholar
EKSS (2009). Eesti keele seletav sõnaraamat [Explanatory dictionary of the Estonian language]. Tallinn: Eesti Keele Instituut. https://eki.ee/dict/ekssGoogle Scholar
Erelt, M. (1997). Reduplication in Estonian. In Erelt, M. (ed.) Estonian: Typological Studies II, Tartu: Department of Estonian of the University of Tartu, 9‒41.Google Scholar
Erelt, M. (2008). Intensifying reduplication in Estonian. Linguistica Uralica 44(4), 268‒77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erelt, M. & Punttila, M. (1999). Suomalais-ugrilaisten kielten reduplikaatiosta. Lähivertailuja 10, 3‒12.Google Scholar
EUD (2015). Eston–udmurt kylľukam [Estonian–Udmurt dictionary]. Tallinn: Eesti Keele Instituut. https://eki.ee/dict/eudGoogle Scholar
Fejes, L. (2004) ‘Compound verbs’ in Komi: Grammaticalisation without a grammatical morpheme? Acta Linguistica Hungarica 51 (1–2), 5–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feoktistov, A. P. (Феоктистов, А. П.) (1974). О конструкциях с повтором основы (figura etymologica) [O konstrukcijax s povtorom osnovy (figura etymologica)] [On constructions with stem repetition (figura etymologica)]. In Szűts, L. (ed.) Jelentéstan és stilisztika. A Magyar Nyelvészek 2. Nemzetközi Kongresszusának előadásai. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 129–36.Google Scholar
Forsberg, U.-M. (2007) Itämansin kielioppi ja tekstejä. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
ISK = Hakulinen, A., Vilkuna, M., Korhonen, R., Koivisto, V., Heinonen, T. R., & Alho, I. (2004) Iso suomen kielioppi. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Ivanov, V. A. (2016). Синтаксис звукоподражаний в финно-пермских языках [Sintaksis zvykopodražanij v finno-permskix jazykax] [Syntax of onomatopoeia in the Finno-Permian languages]. Acta Linguistica Petropolitana 12(1), 709–35.Google ScholarPubMed
Keevallik, L. (2010). Social action of syntactic reduplication. Journal of Pragmatics 42, 800–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keszler, B. (2010). Reduplication and (especially general and indefinite) pronominal function. Studia slavica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 55(2), 299–302.Google Scholar
Kiefer, F. (1995–1996). Prefix reduplication in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 43(1‒2), 175‒94.Google Scholar
Kiefer, F. & Németh, B. (2019). Compounds and multi-word expressions in Hungarian. In Schlücker, B. (ed.) Complex Lexical Units: Compounds and multi-word expressions. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 337–58.Google Scholar
KM = Konakov, N. D., Napol’skih, V. V., Siikala, A.-L., Hoppál, M., & Belyh, S. (2003) Komi Mythology, Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó and Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Lipták, A. & Saab, A. (2019). Hungarian particle reduplication as local doubling. Acta Linguistica Academica 66(4), 527–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lönnrot, E. (1907). Kalevala: The Land of heroes. 2 vols. Translated by W. F. Kirby. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Mäger, M. (1966). Intensiivistavad reduplikatiivsõnad eesti murretes. Emakeele Seltsi Aastaraamat 12, 91–107.Google Scholar
Majtinskaja, K. E. (Майтинская, К. Е.) (1964). Структурные типы удвоений (повторений) в финно-угорских языках [Strukturnyje tipy udvojenij (povtorenij) v finno-ugorskix jazykax] [Structural types of doublings (repetitions) in the Finno-Ugric languages]. In Serebennikov, B. А. (Серебренников, Б. А.) (ed.) Вопросы финно-угорского языкознания: Грамматика и лексикология [Voprosy finno-ugorskogo jazykoznanija: Grammatika i leksikologija] [Issues of Finno-Ugric linguistics: grammar and lexicology]. Leningrad and Moscow: Nauka, 122‒35.Google Scholar
Miestamo, M. (2011). Skolt Saami: A typological profile. Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Aikakauskirja 93: 111–45.Google Scholar
Mikone, E. (2001). Ideophones in the Balto-Finnic languages. In Erhard Voeltz, F. K. & Kilian-Hatz, C. (eds.) Ideophones. Typological Studies in Language, Vol. 44. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins, 223–33.Google Scholar
Niemi, A. R. (ed.) (1919). Suomen kansan vanhat runot. [Old poems of the Finnish people]. Parts 3–4. Helsinki: SKS.Google Scholar
Paasonen, H. (1990–1996). Mordwinisches Wörterbuch. The dialect dictionary of the Mordvin languages based on the materials of Heikki Paasonen. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura. Volumes 1–6 online. https://www.mv.helsinki.fi/home/rueter/PaasonenMW.shtmlGoogle Scholar
Räsänen, M. (2010). Päivä päivältä enemmän ja enemmän. Suomen toistokonstruktioita. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.Google Scholar
Rießler, M. (2022). Kildin Saami. In Bakró-Nagy, M., Laakso, J. & Skribnik, E. (eds.) The Oxford Guide to the Uralic Languages, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 219–39.Google Scholar
Rozhanskiy, F. (2018). Non-Canonical behavior of reduplicated ideophones in Komi. In Urdze, A. (ed.) Non-Prototypical Reduplication. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 177–99.Google Scholar
Sammallahti, P. (1993). Sámi-suoma-sámi sátnegirji: Saamelais-suomalais-saamelainen sanakirja, Ohcejohka: Girjegiisá.Google Scholar
Sammallahti, P. (1998). Saamic. In Abondolo, D. (ed.) The Uralic Languages, London and New York: Routledge, 43–95.Google Scholar
Shiyanova, A. A. (Шиянова, А. А.) (2011). Парно-повторные слова в хантыйском языке (на материале шурышкарского диалекта) [Parno-povtornyje slova w xantyjskom jazyke (na materiale šuryškarskogo dialekta)] [Pair-repeated words in Khanty language (on material of shuryshkar dialect)]. Вестник Угроведения: Филология [Vestnik ugrovedenija: Filologija] 3(6), 38–40.Google Scholar
Shlyakhova, S. S. (2013). Study of reduplication in Finno-Ugrian languages of Permic group. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 16, 1329–333.Google Scholar
Shybanov, A. A. (Шибанов, А. А.) (2010). Наречия и подражательные слова в удмуртском языке [Narečija i podražateľnyje slova v udmurtskom jazyke] [Adverbs and imitative words in the Udmurt language]. Вестник Челябинского государственного университета [Vestnik Čeljabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta] 34(215):
Филология. Искусствоведение
[Filologija. Iskusstvovedenie] 49: 133–36.Google Scholar
Shybanov, A. A. (Шибанов, А. А.) (2017). Редуплицированные подражательные слова в удмуртском языке [Reduplicirovannyje podražateľnyje slova v udmurtskom jazyke]. Восточно-Европейский научный вестник [Vostočno-Evropejskij naučnyj vestnik] 12(4), 85–88.Google Scholar
Siikala, A-L. & Ulyashev, O. (2016). Hidden Rituals and Public Performances. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Sipos, M. (2021). Word and stem repetitions in the heroic epic songs collected by Antal Reguly. In Szeverényi, S. (ed.) Uralic studies, languages, and researchers. Proceedings of the 5th Mikola Conference. 19–20, September 2019. Szeged: University of Szeged, 131–47.Google Scholar
SMS (2022). Suomen murteiden sanakirja. [Dictionary of Finnish dialects]. Centre for Finnish Languages. https://kaino.kotus.fi/smsGoogle Scholar
Solovar, V. N. (Соловар, В. Н.) (2014). Хантыйско-русский словарь (казымский диалект) [Xantyjsko–russkij slovar’ (kazymskij dialekt)] [Khanty–Russian dictionary]. Khanty-Mansiysk: Format.Google Scholar
Szikszainé Nagy, I. (1993). Az ikerítés helye, szerepe, szabályszerűségei a magyar nyelvben, és szabályszerűségei a magyar nyelvben, Budapest: Magyar Nyelvtudományi Társaság.Google Scholar
Szikszainé Nagy, I. (2001). Az ikerszók a magyar szókincs rendszerében, Magyar Nyelvjárások 39: 77–87.Google Scholar
Tsygankin, D. V. (1980). Грамматика Мордовских Языков. [Grammatika mordovskikh yazykov] [Grammar of the Mordovian languages]. Saransk: Mordovian State University.Google Scholar
UKDW (2020). Uusi kielemme: Ruokaruoka Pikapikaa [Finnish for busy people: Double words – Reduplication]. https://bit.ly/3YpR215Google Scholar
Vartiainen, V. (2019). Kotikotiin syömään ruokaruokaa. Kielikello 3/2019. https://www.kielikello.fi/-/kotikotiin-syomaan-ruokaruokaaGoogle Scholar
Zaicz, G. (1998). Mordva. In Abondolo, D. (ed.) The Uralic Languages. London and New York: Routledge, 184–218.Google Scholar