Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T09:20:34.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - The implications of discovering extraterrestrial life: different searches, different issues

from Part II - Extent of life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 December 2010

By
Margaret S. Race
Edited by
Constance M. Bertka
Constance M. Bertka
Affiliation:
AAAS, Washington
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The search for ET life is encompassed within a broad spectrum of research efforts in the field of astrobiology. In general, this multidisciplinary field seeks to understand the origin, evolution, and fate of life in the universe. While searches for ET life represent just a subset of the overall astrobiology goals, they command a disproportionate share of the public interest. To scientists it may be obvious that finding an ET microbe on Mars would be quite different than getting a message from an intelligent civilization somewhere in the Milky Way. However, to the public, the nature and implications of different types of discoveries are probably less clear. Without a systematic analysis of the varied research efforts and a consideration of the science and issues associated with them, it is impossible to get an overview of what it would mean to discover ET life. This chapter attempts such an analysis and focuses additionally on the kinds of societal issues and concerns that need to be communicated to public audiences when discussing astrobiological research and exploration efforts, particularly those centered on searching for ET life.

When searching for ET life, astrobiology uses diverse methods to identify and study potentially habitable locations, understand their environmental conditions, analyze processes that may be associated with life, and, finally, seek evidence for ET life (which may or may not be the same as finding life itself).

Type
Chapter
Information
Exploring the Origin, Extent, and Future of Life
Philosophical, Ethical and Theological Perspectives
 , pp. 205 - 219
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NASA Astrobiology Roadmap (2003), available online at: http://astrobiology.arc.nasa.gov/roadmap.
United Nations Treaty On Principles Governing The Activities Of States In The Exploration And Use Of Outer Space, Including The Moon And Other Celestial Bodies, UN Doc A /Res /2222(XXI); TIAS #6347, NY, 1967.
Rummel, J. D.. Planetary exploration in the time of astrobiology: protecting against biological contamination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98 (2001), 2128031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Race, M. S.. Planetary protection, legal ambiguity and the decision making process for Mars sample return. Advances in Space Research, 18(1/2) (1996), 345–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council. Size Limits of Very Small Organisms: Proceedings of a Workshop (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999), available online at: www.nap.edu.Google Scholar
Dick, S. J.. Life On Other Worlds: The Twentieth Century Extraterrestrial Debate (London: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Tarter, J. E.. Security consideration in signal detection. Invited paper number IAA-97-IAA.9.2.05, International Astronautical Federation, Paris, 1997.
Schenkel, P.. Legal frameworks for two contact scenarios. Journal of the British Interplanetary Society, 50 (1997), 258–262.Google Scholar
Shostak, S.. Media reaction to a SETI success. International Astronautical Congress, Turin, Italy (Paris: International Astronautical Federation, 1997).
Oliver, C., et al. The case of EQ Peg: challenge and response. International Astronautical Congress (Paris: International Astronautical Federation, 1999).
Race, M. S. and Randolph, R. O.. The need for operating guidelines and a decision making framework applicable to the discovery of non-intelligent extraterrestrial life. Advances in Space Research, 30(6) (2002), 1583–1591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, P.. E.T. and God. The Atlantic Monthly (September 2003), available online at: www.theatlantic.com/issues/2003/09/davies.htm.
National Research Council. Mars Sample Return: Issues and Recommendations (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1997), available online at: www.nap.edu.Google Scholar
Rummel, J. D., et al. (eds.). A draft test protocol for detecting possible biohazards in martian samples returned to Earth, NASA/CP-2002–211842 (Washington, DC, 2002).
Race, M. S., et al. Planetary protection and humans on Mars: NASA/ESA workshop results. Advances in Space Research, 42(6) (2008), 1128–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, C. P.. Does Mars have rights? An approach to the environmental ethics of planetary engineering. In Moral Expertise, ed. MacNiven, D. (New York:Routledge, 1990), pp. 184–197.Google Scholar
Lupisella, M.. The rights of Martians. Space Policy, 13(2) (1997), 84–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargrove, E. (ed.). Beyond Spaceship Earth: Environmental Ethics and the Solar System (San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books, 1986).Google Scholar
Randolph, R., et al. Reconsidering the ethical and theological implications of extraterrestrial life. Center for Theology and Natural Sciences Bulletin 17(3) (1997), 1–8. Available online at: www.CTNS.org.Google Scholar
Almár, I.. What could COSPAR do for the protection of the planetary and space environment?Advances in Space Research, 30 (2002), 1577–1581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thater-Braan, R.. The six directions: a pattern for understanding Native American educational values, diversity and the need for cognitive pluralism, SECME Summer Institute, University of Arizona, Tuscon, 2001.
Lupisella, M. and Logsdon, J.. Do we need a cosmocentric ethic? International Astronautical Congress (Turin, Italy), Invited Paper Number IAA-97-IAA.9.2.09. International Astronautical Federation, Paris, 1997.
Dick, S. (ed.). Many Worlds: The New Universe, Extraterrestrial Life and the Theological Implications (Philadelphia, PA: Templeton Foundation Press, 2002).Google Scholar
National Research Council. Preventing the Forward Contamination of Mars, C.F. Chyba (chair) (Washington, DC: National Research Council, National Academy Press, 2006), available online at: www.nap.edu.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×