Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Preface to the First Edition
- Part I Fundamentals
- Part II Cohesion
- Part III Brokerage
- 6 Center and Periphery
- 7 Brokers and Bridges
- 8 Diffusion
- Part IV Ranking
- Part V Roles
- Appendix 1 Getting Started with Pajek
- Appendix 2 Exporting Visualizations
- Appendix 3 Shortcut Key Combinations
- Glossary
- Index of Pajek and R Commands
- Subject Index
7 - Brokers and Bridges
from Part III - Brokerage
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Preface to the First Edition
- Part I Fundamentals
- Part II Cohesion
- Part III Brokerage
- 6 Center and Periphery
- 7 Brokers and Bridges
- 8 Diffusion
- Part IV Ranking
- Part V Roles
- Appendix 1 Getting Started with Pajek
- Appendix 2 Exporting Visualizations
- Appendix 3 Shortcut Key Combinations
- Glossary
- Index of Pajek and R Commands
- Subject Index
Summary
Introduction
A person with many friends and acquaintances has better chances of getting help or information. Therefore, social ties are one measure of social capital, an asset that can be used by actors for positive advantage. Network analysts, however, discovered that the kind of tie is important in addition to the sheer number of ties. Their general argument is that strong (i.e., frequent or intense) ties with people who are themselves related yield less useful information than weak ties with people who do not know one another. Having a lot of ties within a group exposes a person to the same information over and over again, whereas ties outside one's group yield more diverse information that is worth passing on or retaining to make a profit.
As a consequence, we have to pay attention to the ties between a person's contacts. A person who is connected to people who are themselves not directly connected has opportunities to mediate between them and profit from his or her mediation. The ties of this person bridge the structural holes between others. It is hypothesized that people and organizations that bridge structural holes between others have more control and perform better.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek , pp. 159 - 185Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011