Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:26:56.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Politics, Imaginaries and Others in the New World of Work

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2020

Edited by
Jeremy Aroles ,
François-Xavier de Vaujany  and
Karen Dale
Jeremy Aroles
Affiliation:
Durham University
François-Xavier de Vaujany
Affiliation:
Université Paris-Dauphine
Karen Dale
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Experiencing the New World of Work , pp. 179 - 252
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Akram-Lodhi, A. H. & Kay, C. 2010. Surveying the agrarian question (part 1): Unearthing foundations, exploring diversity. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(1): 177–202.Google Scholar
Amul Company 2015. 41st Annual Report. Anand, Gujarat.Google Scholar
BBC 2 2017. Episode 2 of Three Part Documentary, ‘Billion Dollar Deals’ presented by J. Peretti.Google Scholar
Bhatt, E. R. 2006. We Are Poor But so Many: The Story of Self-Employed Women in India. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bhatt, E. R. & Jhabvala, R. 2012. A History of SEWA. Ahmedabad: Navaji de Publishing.Google Scholar
Burrell, G. 2018. Imperialism and the Military-Peasantry Complex. In Grady, J. & Grocott, C. (Eds.) The Continuing Imperialism of Free Trade: Developments, Trends, and the Role of Supranational Agencies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 59–71.Google Scholar
Crouch, C. 2019. Will the Gig Economy Prevail? Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
De Janvry, A., Sadoulet, E. & Young, L. W. (1989). Land and labour in Latin American agriculture from the 1950s to the 1980s. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 16(3), 396–424.Google Scholar
Edelman, M. & James, C. 2011. Peasants’ rights and the UN system: Quixotic struggle? Or emancipatory idea whose time has come? Journal of Peasant Studies 38(1): 1–32.Google Scholar
Fisher, T., Mahajan, V. & Singha, A. 1997. The Forgotten Sector: Non-Farm Employment and Enterprises in Rural India. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, S. H. 1969. The European Peasantry: The Final Phase. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Gerber, J. F. 2014. The role of rural indebtedness in the evolution of capitalism. Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(5): 729–747.Google Scholar
Gerth, H. H. & Wright, Mills C. (eds.) 1948. For Max Weber. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Handy, J. 2009. ‘Almost idiotic wretchedness’: A long history of blaming peasants. Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(2): 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, J. E. C. 1989. The Common People: A History from the Norman Conquest to the Present. Roermond: Fontana.Google Scholar
Jacques, R. 1996. Manufacturing the Employee: Management Knowledge from the 19th to 21st Century. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kearney, M. 1996. Reconceptualizing the Peasantry: Anthropology in Global Perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Kumar, A. 2015. Organizing Tataland, The Modern Nation: A History of Development in Post/Colonial India. PhD Thesis: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Kumar, K. J. & Thomas, A. O. 2006. Telecommunications and development: The cellular mobile ‘revolution’ in India and China. Journal of Creative Communications, 1(3): 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerche, J. 2013. The agrarian question in neoliberal India: Agrarian transition bypassed? Journal of Agrarian Change, 13(3): 382–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K. 1987. The Peasantry as a Class. In Shanin, T. (ed.) Peasants and Peasant Society. London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
McMichael, P. 2008. Peasants make their own history, but not just as they please. Journal of Agrarian Change, 8(2–3): 205–228.Google Scholar
Mitrany, D. 1951. Marx against the Peasant. London: George Weidenfeld and Nicholson.Google Scholar
Peretti, J. 2017. Done: The Billion Dollar Deals and How They’re Changing Our World. London: BBC Publications.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. A. 2005. An Unfinished Agenda: My Life in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Haryana: Portfolio.Google Scholar
Sanyal, K. 2014. Rethinking Capitalist Development: Primitive Accumulation, Governmentality and Post-colonial Capitalism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saragih, H. 2009. Statement by Mr. Henry Saragih, General Coordinator of La Via Campesina at the United Nations General Assembly. New York: UNOGoogle Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1967. Time, work-discipline, and industrial capitalism. Past & Present, 38: 56–97.Google Scholar
Thorner, A. 1982. Semi-feudalism or capitalism? Contemporary debate on classes and modes of production in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 17(49): 1961–1968.Google Scholar
Van Der Ploeg, J. D. 2008. The New Peasantries: Struggles for Autonomy and Sustainability in an Era of Empire and Globalisation. Abingdon: Earthscan.Google Scholar

References

Anonymous 1969. FRANCE: May 1968, WORKERS REBEL! Available at: www.marxists.org/history/erol/1960-1970/francemay68.pdf (Accessed: 30 January 2020).Google Scholar
Applebaum, H. 1992. The Concept of Work. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Aroles, J., Mitev, N. & de Vaujany, F. X. 2019. Mapping themes in the study of new work practices. New Technology, Work and Employment, 34(3): 285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronowitz, S. & DiFazio, W. 1994. The Jobless Future. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Baldry, H. C. 1953. The idler's paradise in Attic comedy. Greece and Rome, 22(65): 49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basso, P. 2003. Modern Times, Ancient Hours, trans. G. Donis. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bastani, A. 2019. Fully Automated Luxury Communism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Beck, U. 2000. The Brave New World of Work. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bell, D. 1973. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bix, A. 2000. Inventing Ourselves out of Jobs? London: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blauner, R. 1964. Alienation and Freedom. London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bleakley, D. 1985. Beyond Work – Free to Be. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
Booth, W. 1991. Economies of time: On the idea of time in Marx’s political economy. Political Theory, 19(1): 205–222.Google Scholar
Bourgeois, P. 1995. Workaday world, crack economy. The Nation, 4 December: 706–711.Google Scholar
Brown, D. 1991. Review critique of economic reason by Andre Gorz, Gillian Handyside and Chris Turner. Journal of Economic Issues, 25(3): 866–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brynjolfsson, E. & McAfee, A. 2014. The Second Machine Age. London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Clark, G. & Van Der Werf, Y. 1998. Work in progress? The industrious revolution. The Journal of Economic History, 58(3): 830–843.Google Scholar
Clegg, S. & Pina e Cunha, M. 2019. Management, Organizations and Contemporary Social Theory. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Denning, M. 2010. Wageless life. New Left Review, 66: 79–97.Google Scholar
Edgell, S. & Granter, E. 2019. The Sociology of Work. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Etzler, J. A. 1842. The Paradise within the Reach of All Men… London: J. Cleave.Google Scholar
Farber, D. 2019. Crack: Rock Cocaine, Street Capitalism, and the Decade of Greed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fleming, P. 2015. The Mythology of Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fourier, C. 1972. The Utopian Vision of Charles Fourier, trans. Beecher, J., and Bienvenu, R.. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Frankel, B. 1987. The Post-industrial Utopians. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Frayne, D. 2015. The Refusal of Work. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Frey, C. B. & Osborne, M. A. 2013. The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerisation? (Working Paper). Oxford Martin School: University of Oxford. Available at: www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/publications/the-future-of-employment/ (Accessed 30 January 2020).Google Scholar
Gorz, A. 1967. Strategy for Labor, trans. Nicolaus, M. A. and Ortiz, V.. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Gorz, A. 1980. Adieux au proletariat: au–dela du socialisme Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
Gorz, A. 1982. Farewell to the Working Class, trans. Sonenscher, M.. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
Gorz, A. 1985. Paths to Paradise, trans. M. Imrie. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
Gorz, A. 1989. Critique of Economic Reason, trans. G. Handyside and C. Turner. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Gorz, A. 1999. Reclaiming Work, trans. C. Turner. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Gorz, A. 2003. L'immatériel. Connaissance, valeur et capital. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
Graeber, D. 2018. Bullshit Jobs. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Graham, M., Hjorth, I. & Lehdonvirta, V. 2017. Digital labour and development: Impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2): 135–162.Google Scholar
Granter, E. 2009. Critical Social Theory and the End of Work. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Granter, E. 2014. Critical Theory and Organization Studies. In Adler, P., DuGay, P. & Morgan, G. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Sociology, Social Theory and Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 534–560.Google Scholar
Granter, E. 2019. The Frankfurt School and Critical Theory. In Clegg, S. R. & Pina e Cunha, M. (eds.) Management, Organizations and Contemporary Social Theory. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guizzo, D. & Stronge, W. 2018. Keynes, Foucault and the ‘disciplinary complex’: A contribution to the analysis of work. Autonomy, 2.Google Scholar
Gunderson, R. 2018. Degrowth and other quiescent futures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198: 1574–1582.Google Scholar
Handy, C. 1984. The Future of Work. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harper, C. & Ward, C. 1990 [1974–1975]. Visions. In Richards, V. (ed.) Why Work. London: Freedom Press, pp. 149–154.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, M. 2002 [1937]. Traditional and Critical Theory. In Horkheimer, M. (ed.) Critical Theory; Selected Essays. New York: Continuum, pp. 188–243.Google Scholar
Jay, M. 1996 [1973]. The Dialectical Imagination 1923–1950. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, C. & Sherman, B. 1979. The Collapse of Work. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Kellner, D. 1989. Critical Theory, Marxism and Modernity. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
Lang, L. 2020. You Make Do with what You’ve Got. In Evans, G. (ed.) Post-industrial Precarity. Wilmington, NC: Vernon Press, pp.151–171.Google Scholar
Leicht, K. T. 1998. Work (if you can get it) and occupations (if there are any)? What social scientists can learn from predictions of the end of work and radical workplace change. Work and Occupations, 25(1): 36–48.Google Scholar
Macherey, P. 2015. The Productive Subject. Viewpoint Magazine, 31 October. Available at: www.viewpointmag.com/2015/10/31/the-productive-subject/ (Accessed: 30 January 2020).Google Scholar
Marcuse, H. 1970. The End of Utopia. In Marcuse, H. Five Lectures. Boston: Beacon, pp. 62–82.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H. 1973 [1933]. On the philosophical foundation of the concept of labor in economics (trans. D. Kellner). Telos, 16: 9–37.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H. 1986 [1964]. One Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. London: Ark.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H. 1987 [1955]. Eros and Civilization. London: Ark.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H. 2005 [1968]. A Conversation with Herbert Marcuse. In Kellner, D. (ed.) Herbert Marcuse, the New Left and the 1960s. London: Routledge, pp. 154–164.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1845. The German Ideology. Available at: www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/german-ideology/ch01a.htm (Accessed: 30 January 2020).Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1974 [1867]. Capital. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1975 [1844]. Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts. In Coletti, L. (ed.) Early Writings. London: Penguin, pp. 279–400.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1977 [1894]. Capital Vol. III. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1993 [1857-8]. Grundrisse. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mason, P. 2016. Postcapitalism. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Mavor, C. 2016. The Closed Cosmogony of Utopia. 8 September 2016. Frieze. Available at: https://frieze.com/article/closed-cosmogony-utopia (Accessed: 30 January 2020).Google Scholar
McLean, D. D. & Hurd, A. R. 2015. Kraus’ Recreation and Leisure in Modern Society. Burlington, MA: Jones and Bartlett Learning.Google Scholar
Meagher, G. 2003. Friend or Flunkey? Sydney: UNSW Press.Google Scholar
Musto, M. 2010. Revisiting Marx's concept of alienation. Socialism and Democracy, 24(3): 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neimark, M. & Tinker, T. 1987. Identity and non identity thinking: A dialectical critique of the transaction cost theory of the modern corporation. Journal of Management, 13(4): 661–673.Google Scholar
Pitts, F. H. & Dinerstein, A. C. 2017. Postcapitalism, Basic Income and the End of Work: A Critique and Alternative. Bath Papers in International Development and Wellbeing, No. 55, University of Bath, Centre for Development Studies (CDS), Bath.Google Scholar
Poster, M. 1975. Existential Marxism in Post-War France. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pym, D. 1990 [1981]. The Other Economy as a Social System. In Richards, V. (ed.) Why Work. London: Freedom Press, pp. 137–149.Google Scholar
Rachlis, C. 1978. Marcuse and the problem of happiness. Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory, 2(1): 63–89.Google Scholar
Ralph, L. 2014. Renegade Dreams. London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ransby, B. 1996. US: the Black Poor and the Politics of Expendability. Race and Class, 38(2): 1–12.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. 1976. The “revolt against work”, or fight for the right to be lazy. Fifth Estate. Available at: www.fifthestate.org/archive/279-december-1976/the-revolt-against-work-or-fight-for-the-right-to-be-lazy/ (Accessed: 30 January 2020).Google Scholar
Rifkin, J. 1996 [1995]. The End of Work. New York: G.P. Putnam.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. 1985. Future Work. London: Gower/Maurice Temple Smith.Google Scholar
Robertson, K. & Uebel, M. 2016. The Middle Ages at Work. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, A. 2020. Gig economy now making workers organize groceries in rich people's fridge. VICE, Jan 09. Available at: www.vice.com/en_us/article/qjd8vq/gig-economy-now-making-workers-organize-groceries-in-rich-peoples-fridges (Accessed: 30 January 2020).Google Scholar
Rothkopf, D. 2008. Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They Are Making. New York: Farrar.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M.D. 1972. Stone Age Economics. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Segal, H. P. 1985. Technological Utopianism in American Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schor, J. B. 1993. The Overworked American. New York: BasicBooks.Google Scholar
Spiers, S. n.d. Women in Utopia: Charles Fourier's Theory of the Four Movements. Available at: www.academia.edu/32791990/Women_in_Utopia_Charles_Fouriers_Theory_of_the_Four_Movements (Accessed: 30 January 2020).Google Scholar
Srnicek, N. & Williams, A. 2015. Inventing the Future. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Steel, M. 2012. When Tories demonise the workless. Independent, 28 November.Google Scholar
Sturdy, A. & Morgan, G. 2018. Management consultancies: Inventing the future. Futures of Work, Issue 1. Available at: https://futuresofwork.co.uk/2018/09/05/management-consultancies-inventing-the-future-2/ (Accessed: 30 January 2020).Google Scholar
Susskind, D. 2020. A World without Work. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Taylor, A. 2018. The automation charade. Logic Magazine. Available at: https://logicmag.io/failure/the-automation-charade/ (Accessed: 30 January 2020).Google Scholar
Thrift, N. 2001. “It's the romance, not the finance, that makes the business worth pursuing”: disclosing a new market culture. Economy and Society, 30(4): 412–432.Google Scholar
Venkatesh, S. A. 2008. Gang Leader for a Day: A Rogue Sociologist Takes to the Streets. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Weeks, K. 2011. The Problem with Work. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Weiner, N. 1950. The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Human Beings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Westwood, S. 2000. Re-branding Britain: Sociology, futures and futurology. Sociology, 34(1): 185–202.Google Scholar
Wilson, W. J. 2011. When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Wood, A. J., Graham, M. & Lehdonvirta, V. 2018. Good gig, bad big: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1): 56–75.Google Scholar
Zilbersheid, U. 2008. The utopia of Herbert Marcuse part 1. Critique, 36(3): 403–419.Google Scholar

References

Anderson, C. 2012. Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
Andriotis, A.M., Rudegeair, P. & Hoffman, L. 2019. Facebook’s New Cryptocurrency, Libra, Gets Big Backers. The Wall Street Journal. www.wsj.com/articles/facebooks-new-cryptocurrency-gets-big-backers-11560463312Google Scholar
Arendt, H. 1998. The Human Condition (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Aroles, J., Mitev, N. & de Vaujany, F. X. 2019. Mapping themes in the study of new work practices. New Technology, Work and Employment, 34(3): 285–299.Google Scholar
Bacqué, M. H., Rey, H. & Sintomer, Y. 2005. Gestion de proximité et démocratie participative. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Barley, S. R. 2010. Building an institutional field to corral a government: A case to set an agenda for organization studies. Organization Studies, 31(6): 777–805.Google Scholar
Besley, T. & Burgess, R. 2001. Political agency, government responsiveness and the role of the media. European Economic Review, 45(4): 629–640.Google Scholar
Bosch-Sijtsema, P., Ruohomäki, V. & Vartiainen, M. 2010. Multi-locational knowledge workers in the office: Navigation, disturbances and effectiveness. New Technology, Employment and Work, 25(3): 183–195.Google Scholar
Botsman, R. & Rogers, R. 2011. What’s Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
Brocklehurst, M., Grey, C. & Sturdy, A. 2009. Management: The work that dares not speak its name. Management Learning, 41(1): 7–19.Google Scholar
Burnham, J. 1941. The Managerial Revolution: What Is Happening in the World. New York: John Day Company.Google Scholar
Cappelli, P. & Keller, J. R. 2013. Classifying work in the new economy. Academy of Management Review, 38(4): 575–596.Google Scholar
Castells, M. 1996. The net and the self: Working notes for a critical theory of the informational society. Critique of Anthropology, 16(1), 9–38.Google Scholar
Cerny, P. G. 2000. Political agency in a globalizing world: Toward a structurational approach. European Journal of International Relations, 6(4): 435–463.Google Scholar
Clegg, S. R. 1989. Frameworks of Power. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, S. R. & Dunkerley, D. 1980. Organization, Class and Control. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coombs, N. 2013. Politics of the Event after Hegel. Ph.D., Faculty of History and Social Sciences.Google Scholar
Courpasson, D. 2008. We Have always Been Oligarchs: Business Elite in Polyarchy. In Clegg, S. R. and Cooper, C. L. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Behaviour. Sage, 424–443.Google Scholar
Courpasson, D. & Clegg, S. R. 2006. Dissolving the iron cages? Tocqueville, Michels, bureaucracy and the perpetuation of elite power. Organization, 13(3): 319–343.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, A. L. & Locke, K. 2019. Working with differences in everyday interactions through anticipational fluidity: A hermeneutic perspective. Organization Studies. DOI: 10.1177/0170840619831035.Google Scholar
Dale, K. 2005. Building a social materiality: Spatial and embodied politics in organizational control. Organization, 12(5): 649–678.Google Scholar
Daskalaki, D., Hjorth, D. & Mair, J. 2015. Are entrepreneurship, communities, and social transformation related? Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(4): 419-423.Google Scholar
de Vaujany, F. X. 2010a. Activités marchandes, activités administratives, marché et organisation: une approche sur la longue durée via l'Eglise. In: Hatchuel, A., Favreau, O. and Aggeri, F. (eds.) L'activité marchande sans le marché. Paris: Presses de l’Ecole des Mines de Paris.Google Scholar
de Vaujany, F. X. 2010b. A new perspective on the genealogy of collective action through the history of religious organizations. Management & Organizational History, 5(1): 65–78.Google Scholar
de Vaujany, F. X. 2019. Legitimation Process in Organizations and Organizing: An Ontological Discussion. In Materiality in Institutions. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 343–377.Google Scholar
de Vaujany, F. X. & Aroles, J. 2019. Nothing happened, something happened: Silence in a makerspace. Management Learning, 50(2): 208–225.Google Scholar
de Vaujany, F. X., Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A. & Holt, R. 2020. Communities versus platforms: The paradox in the body of the collaborative economy. Journal of Management Inquiry, 29(4): 450–467.Google Scholar
de Vaujany, F. X. & Mitev, N. 2016. Le tournant materiel. In de Vaujany, F. X., Hussenot, A. and Chanlat, J. F. (eds.) Les théories des organisations: grandes tournants. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
de Vaujany, F. X. & Mitev, N. 2017. The post-Macy paradox, information management and organizing: good intentions and road to hell? Culture & Organization, 23(5): 379–407.Google Scholar
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E. & Stern, P. C. 2003. The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652): 1907–1912.Google Scholar
Drucker, P. 1945, 2017. Concept of the Corporation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Epstein, E. M. 1969. The Corporation in American Politics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Faravelon, A. & Grumbach, S. 2016. Platforms as Governments. The Internet, Policy & Politics Conferences, Oxford Internet Institute.Google Scholar
Farias, C., Fernandez, P., Hjorth, D.,& Holt, R. 2019. Organizational Entrepreneurship, Politics and the Political. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 31(7–8): 555–566.Google Scholar
Fayard, A. L. 2019. Notes on the Meaning of Work: Labor, Work, and Action in the 21st Century. Journal of Management Inquiry. DOI: 1056492619841705.Google Scholar
Fleming, P. 2017. The Human capital coax: Work, debt and insecurity in the era of Uberization. Organization Studies, 38(5): 691–709.Google Scholar
Follett, M. P. 1918. The New State: Group Organization, Solution to Popular Government. New York: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Follett, M. P. 1919. Community as process. Philosophical Review, 28: 576–588.Google Scholar
Friedman, G. 2014. Workers without employers: Shadow corporations and the rise of the gig economy. Review of Keynesian Economics, 2(2): 171–188.Google Scholar
Friedman, T. 2019. Hong Kong’s protests could be another social media revolution that ends in failure. New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2019/09/17/opinion/hong-kong-protest.htmlGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, F. 2006. The End of History and the Last Man. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Garrett, L. E., Spreitzer, G. M. & Bacevice, P. A. 2017. Co-constructing a sense of community at work: The emergence of community in coworking spaces. Organization Studies, 38(6): 821–842.Google Scholar
Gregg, M. 2018. Counterproductive: Time Management in the Knowledge Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gutzan, S. & Tuckermann, H. 2019. Neat in theory, entangled in praxis: A practice perspective on the social notion of collective reflection in organisations. Management Learning, 50(3): 319–336.Google Scholar
Häkli, J. & Kallio, K. P. 2014. Subject, action and polis: Theorizing political agency. Progress in Human Geography, 38(2): 181–200.Google Scholar
Hickson, D., Flemming, A., Franco, F., Hofstede, G., Kieser, A., Cornelis, T. & Lammers, J. C. 1980. Editorial. Organization Studies, 1(1): 1–2.Google Scholar
Hjorth, D. & Steyaert, C. 2009. The Politics and Aesthetics of Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Hjorth, D. & Holt, R. 2016. It's entrepreneurship, not enterprise: Ai Weiwei as entrepreneur. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 5: 50–54.Google Scholar
Holt, R., & Johnsen, R. 2019. Time and organization studies. Organization Studies. DOI: 10.1177/0170840619844292.Google Scholar
Hunter, F. 1953. Community Power Structure. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Introna, L. 2019. On the making of sense in sensemaking: Decentred sensemaking in the meshwork of life. Organization Studies, 40(5): 745–764.Google Scholar
Kane, C. & Ransbotham, S. 2016. Content as community regulator: The recursive relationship between consumption and contribution in open collaboration communities. Organization Science, 27(5): 1258–1274.Google Scholar
Kieser, A. 1989. Organizational, institutional, and societal evolution: Medieval craft guilds and the genesis of formal organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(4): 540–564.Google Scholar
Kingma, S. 2019. New ways of working (NWW): Work space and cultural change in virtualizing organizations. Culture and Organization, 25(5), 383–406.Google Scholar
Lallement, M. 2015. L’âge du faire. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 2019. Pour la première fois, on a un gouvernement incapable d'écouter et un peuple incapable de s'exprimer. www.franceinter.fr/emissions/l-invite-de-8h20-le-grand-entretien/l-invite-de-8h20-le-grand-entretien-18-janvier-2019Google Scholar
Le Goff, J. 1957, 2000. Les intellectuels au Moyen Age. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Locke, R. & Schone, K. 2004. The Entrepreneurial Shift. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Makimoto, T. & Manners, D. 1997. Digital Nomad. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Matlay, H., & Westhead, P. 2005. Virtual teams and the rise of e-entrepreneurship in Europe. International Small Business Journal, 23(3): 279–302.Google Scholar
Mattei, U. 2012. First thoughts for a phenomenology of the commons. Socialisation and Commons in Europe, 75.Google Scholar
McGregor, J. 2011. Contestations and consequences of deportability: Hunger strikes and the political agency of non-citizens. Citizenship Studies, 15(5): 597–611.Google Scholar
Messenger, J. C. & Gschwind, L. 2016. Three generations of Telework: New ICTs and the (r)evolution from home office to yirtual office. New Technology, Work and Employment, 31(3): 195–208.Google Scholar
Miles, R. E., Miles, G. & Snow, C. C. 2005. Collaborative Entrepreneurship: How Communities of Networked Firms Use Continuous Innovation to Create Economic Wealth. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Miles, R. E., Miles, G. & Snow, C. C. 2006. Collaborative entrepreneurship: A business model for continuous innovation. Organizational Dynamics, 35(1): 1–11.Google Scholar
Oldenburg, R. 1989. The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Community Centers, Beauty Parlors, General Stores, Bars, Hangouts, and How They Get You through the Day. New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. 2002. Reformulating the commons. Ambiente & sociedade, 10: 5–25.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. 1965. Suggestions for a sociological approach to the theory of organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1(1): 63–85.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. 1978. Ecrits sur le signe. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Pennel, D. 2013. Travailler pour soi: quel avenir pour le travail à l'heure de la révolution individualiste?. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Perrow, C. 1972. Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.Google Scholar
Perrow, C. 2002. Organizing America: Wealth, Power and the Origins of Corporate Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Petriglieri, G., Ashford, S. J. & Wrzesniewski, A. 2019. Agony and ecstasy in the gig economy: Cultivating holding environments for precarious and personalized work identities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(1): 124–170.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. 1985. Temps et récit (Volume 3). Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
Robertson, B. 2015. Holacracy: The new Management System for a Rapidly Changing World. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Rocha, H. & Miles, R. 2009. A model of collaborative entrepreneurship for a more humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3): 445–462.Google Scholar
Rosa, H. 2019. Resonance. A Sociology of Our Relationship to the World. Trans. Wagner, J., Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Sarpong, D., Eyres, E. & Batsakis, G. 2019. Narrating the future: A distentive capability approach to strategic foresight. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 105–114.Google Scholar
Schatzki, T. R. 2010. The Timespace of Human Activity: On Performance, Society, and History as Indeterminate Teleological Events. Lexington, KY: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Selznick, P. 1949. TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Serres, M. 2007. Les nouvelles technologies: révolution culturelle et cognitive. Conférence sur les nouvelles technologies lors du 40è anniversaire de l'INRIA. www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCBB0QEmT5gGoogle Scholar
Serres, M. 2012. Petite Poucette. Paris: Éditions Le Pommier.Google Scholar
Urry, J. 2007. Mobilities. Polity Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×