Book contents
- Experiencing the New World of Work
- Experiencing the New World of Work
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Part I Experiencing at Work
- Part II Digital Platforms and the New World of Work
- Part III Politics, Imaginaries and Others in the New World of Work
- 8 Bypassing the Stage of Copper Wire?
- 9 Critical Theory and the Post-work Imaginary
- 10 Exploring the New in Politics at Work
- Conclusion
- Afterword
- Index
- References
10 - Exploring the New in Politics at Work
A Temporal Approach of Managerial Agencies
from Part III - Politics, Imaginaries and Others in the New World of Work
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 December 2020
Book contents
- Experiencing the New World of Work
- Experiencing the New World of Work
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Part I Experiencing at Work
- Part II Digital Platforms and the New World of Work
- Part III Politics, Imaginaries and Others in the New World of Work
- 8 Bypassing the Stage of Copper Wire?
- 9 Critical Theory and the Post-work Imaginary
- 10 Exploring the New in Politics at Work
- Conclusion
- Afterword
- Index
- References
Summary
In this essay, we contend that new ways of working imply a crisis both of communities and politics in our societies. We introduce the concept of 'co-politicisation' to make sense of the potential highly transformative political power of managerial agency in society. In the context of ongoing work transformations, managerial agency increasingly seems to become a political agency, through its potential to transform society and the sense of togetherness. However, in the meantime, politics has entered into crisis. Each of us has the possibility to express their own, individual voice, but without building, in turn, any meaningful or resonant collective and community. We argue that a temporal approach is needed to understand such a crisis of community and of the politics. To that end, we introduce Paul Ricoeur (1985)’s thought on a ‘crisis of the present’ that we apply to new ways of working. We conclude by suggesting that new ways of working may be missing practices likely to produce the extra-temporality that managerial agency needs to perform. Without this extra-temporality, the managerial agency of new ways of working just keeps weakening our sense of togetherness.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Experiencing the New World of Work , pp. 227 - 252Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Andriotis, A.M., Rudegeair, P. & Hoffman, L. 2019. Facebook’s New Cryptocurrency, Libra, Gets Big Backers. The Wall Street Journal. www.wsj.com/articles/facebooks-new-cryptocurrency-gets-big-backers-11560463312Google Scholar
Aroles, J., Mitev, N. & de Vaujany, F. X. 2019. Mapping themes in the study of new work practices. New Technology, Work and Employment, 34(3): 285–299.Google Scholar
Bacqué, M. H., Rey, H. & Sintomer, Y. 2005. Gestion de proximité et démocratie participative. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Barley, S. R. 2010. Building an institutional field to corral a government: A case to set an agenda for organization studies. Organization Studies, 31(6): 777–805.Google Scholar
Besley, T. & Burgess, R. 2001. Political agency, government responsiveness and the role of the media. European Economic Review, 45(4): 629–640.Google Scholar
Bosch-Sijtsema, P., Ruohomäki, V. & Vartiainen, M. 2010. Multi-locational knowledge workers in the office: Navigation, disturbances and effectiveness. New Technology, Employment and Work, 25(3): 183–195.Google Scholar
Botsman, R. & Rogers, R. 2011. What’s Mine Is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
Brocklehurst, M., Grey, C. & Sturdy, A. 2009. Management: The work that dares not speak its name. Management Learning, 41(1): 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, J. 1941. The Managerial Revolution: What Is Happening in the World. New York: John Day Company.Google Scholar
Cappelli, P. & Keller, J. R. 2013. Classifying work in the new economy. Academy of Management Review, 38(4): 575–596.Google Scholar
Castells, M. 1996. The net and the self: Working notes for a critical theory of the informational society. Critique of Anthropology, 16(1), 9–38.Google Scholar
Cerny, P. G. 2000. Political agency in a globalizing world: Toward a structurational approach. European Journal of International Relations, 6(4): 435–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clegg, S. R. & Dunkerley, D. 1980. Organization, Class and Control. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coombs, N. 2013. Politics of the Event after Hegel. Ph.D., Faculty of History and Social Sciences.Google Scholar
Courpasson, D. 2008. We Have always Been Oligarchs: Business Elite in Polyarchy. In Clegg, S. R. and Cooper, C. L. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Behaviour. Sage, 424–443.Google Scholar
Courpasson, D. & Clegg, S. R. 2006. Dissolving the iron cages? Tocqueville, Michels, bureaucracy and the perpetuation of elite power. Organization, 13(3): 319–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunliffe, A. L. & Locke, K. 2019. Working with differences in everyday interactions through anticipational fluidity: A hermeneutic perspective. Organization Studies. DOI: 10.1177/0170840619831035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, K. 2005. Building a social materiality: Spatial and embodied politics in organizational control. Organization, 12(5): 649–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daskalaki, D., Hjorth, D. & Mair, J. 2015. Are entrepreneurship, communities, and social transformation related? Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(4): 419-423.Google Scholar
de Vaujany, F. X. 2010a. Activités marchandes, activités administratives, marché et organisation: une approche sur la longue durée via l'Eglise. In: Hatchuel, A., Favreau, O. and Aggeri, F. (eds.) L'activité marchande sans le marché. Paris: Presses de l’Ecole des Mines de Paris.Google Scholar
de Vaujany, F. X. 2010b. A new perspective on the genealogy of collective action through the history of religious organizations. Management & Organizational History, 5(1): 65–78.Google Scholar
de Vaujany, F. X. 2019. Legitimation Process in Organizations and Organizing: An Ontological Discussion. In Materiality in Institutions. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 343–377.Google Scholar
de Vaujany, F. X. & Aroles, J. 2019. Nothing happened, something happened: Silence in a makerspace. Management Learning, 50(2): 208–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vaujany, F. X., Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A. & Holt, R. 2020. Communities versus platforms: The paradox in the body of the collaborative economy. Journal of Management Inquiry, 29(4): 450–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vaujany, F. X. & Mitev, N. 2016. Le tournant materiel. In de Vaujany, F. X., Hussenot, A. and Chanlat, J. F. (eds.) Les théories des organisations: grandes tournants. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
de Vaujany, F. X. & Mitev, N. 2017. The post-Macy paradox, information management and organizing: good intentions and road to hell? Culture & Organization, 23(5): 379–407.Google Scholar
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E. & Stern, P. C. 2003. The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652): 1907–1912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epstein, E. M. 1969. The Corporation in American Politics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Faravelon, A. & Grumbach, S. 2016. Platforms as Governments. The Internet, Policy & Politics Conferences, Oxford Internet Institute.Google Scholar
Farias, C., Fernandez, P., Hjorth, D.,& Holt, R. 2019. Organizational Entrepreneurship, Politics and the Political. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 31(7–8): 555–566.Google Scholar
Fayard, A. L. 2019. Notes on the Meaning of Work: Labor, Work, and Action in the 21st Century. Journal of Management Inquiry. DOI: 1056492619841705.Google Scholar
Fleming, P. 2017. The Human capital coax: Work, debt and insecurity in the era of Uberization. Organization Studies, 38(5): 691–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Follett, M. P. 1918. The New State: Group Organization, Solution to Popular Government. New York: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Friedman, G. 2014. Workers without employers: Shadow corporations and the rise of the gig economy. Review of Keynesian Economics, 2(2): 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, T. 2019. Hong Kong’s protests could be another social media revolution that ends in failure. New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2019/09/17/opinion/hong-kong-protest.htmlGoogle Scholar
Garrett, L. E., Spreitzer, G. M. & Bacevice, P. A. 2017. Co-constructing a sense of community at work: The emergence of community in coworking spaces. Organization Studies, 38(6): 821–842.Google Scholar
Gregg, M. 2018. Counterproductive: Time Management in the Knowledge Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gutzan, S. & Tuckermann, H. 2019. Neat in theory, entangled in praxis: A practice perspective on the social notion of collective reflection in organisations. Management Learning, 50(3): 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Häkli, J. & Kallio, K. P. 2014. Subject, action and polis: Theorizing political agency. Progress in Human Geography, 38(2): 181–200.Google Scholar
Hickson, D., Flemming, A., Franco, F., Hofstede, G., Kieser, A., Cornelis, T. & Lammers, J. C. 1980. Editorial. Organization Studies, 1(1): 1–2.Google Scholar
Hjorth, D. & Steyaert, C. 2009. The Politics and Aesthetics of Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Hjorth, D. & Holt, R. 2016. It's entrepreneurship, not enterprise: Ai Weiwei as entrepreneur. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 5: 50–54.Google Scholar
Holt, R., & Johnsen, R. 2019. Time and organization studies. Organization Studies. DOI: 10.1177/0170840619844292.Google Scholar
Hunter, F. 1953. Community Power Structure. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Introna, L. 2019. On the making of sense in sensemaking: Decentred sensemaking in the meshwork of life. Organization Studies, 40(5): 745–764.Google Scholar
Kane, C. & Ransbotham, S. 2016. Content as community regulator: The recursive relationship between consumption and contribution in open collaboration communities. Organization Science, 27(5): 1258–1274.Google Scholar
Kieser, A. 1989. Organizational, institutional, and societal evolution: Medieval craft guilds and the genesis of formal organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(4): 540–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingma, S. 2019. New ways of working (NWW): Work space and cultural change in virtualizing organizations. Culture and Organization, 25(5), 383–406.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 2019. Pour la première fois, on a un gouvernement incapable d'écouter et un peuple incapable de s'exprimer. www.franceinter.fr/emissions/l-invite-de-8h20-le-grand-entretien/l-invite-de-8h20-le-grand-entretien-18-janvier-2019Google Scholar
Locke, R. & Schone, K. 2004. The Entrepreneurial Shift. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Matlay, H., & Westhead, P. 2005. Virtual teams and the rise of e-entrepreneurship in Europe. International Small Business Journal, 23(3): 279–302.Google Scholar
Mattei, U. 2012. First thoughts for a phenomenology of the commons. Socialisation and Commons in Europe, 75.Google Scholar
McGregor, J. 2011. Contestations and consequences of deportability: Hunger strikes and the political agency of non-citizens. Citizenship Studies, 15(5): 597–611.Google Scholar
Messenger, J. C. & Gschwind, L. 2016. Three generations of Telework: New ICTs and the (r)evolution from home office to yirtual office. New Technology, Work and Employment, 31(3): 195–208.Google Scholar
Miles, R. E., Miles, G. & Snow, C. C. 2005. Collaborative Entrepreneurship: How Communities of Networked Firms Use Continuous Innovation to Create Economic Wealth. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Miles, R. E., Miles, G. & Snow, C. C. 2006. Collaborative entrepreneurship: A business model for continuous innovation. Organizational Dynamics, 35(1): 1–11.Google Scholar
Oldenburg, R. 1989. The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Community Centers, Beauty Parlors, General Stores, Bars, Hangouts, and How They Get You through the Day. New York: Paragon House.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. 1965. Suggestions for a sociological approach to the theory of organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1(1): 63–85.Google Scholar
Pennel, D. 2013. Travailler pour soi: quel avenir pour le travail à l'heure de la révolution individualiste?. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Perrow, C. 1972. Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.Google Scholar
Perrow, C. 2002. Organizing America: Wealth, Power and the Origins of Corporate Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Petriglieri, G., Ashford, S. J. & Wrzesniewski, A. 2019. Agony and ecstasy in the gig economy: Cultivating holding environments for precarious and personalized work identities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(1): 124–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, B. 2015. Holacracy: The new Management System for a Rapidly Changing World. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Rocha, H. & Miles, R. 2009. A model of collaborative entrepreneurship for a more humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(3): 445–462.Google Scholar
Rosa, H. 2019. Resonance. A Sociology of Our Relationship to the World. Trans. Wagner, J., Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Sarpong, D., Eyres, E. & Batsakis, G. 2019. Narrating the future: A distentive capability approach to strategic foresight. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 105–114.Google Scholar
Schatzki, T. R. 2010. The Timespace of Human Activity: On Performance, Society, and History as Indeterminate Teleological Events. Lexington, KY: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Selznick, P. 1949. TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Serres, M. 2007. Les nouvelles technologies: révolution culturelle et cognitive. Conférence sur les nouvelles technologies lors du 40è anniversaire de l'INRIA. www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCBB0QEmT5gGoogle Scholar