Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-m789k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-09T03:27:14.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2025

Ashley K. Randall
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Pamela J. Lannutti
Affiliation:
Widener University, Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

This introduction provides an overview of the SMGD-MN study, including information on the context to which it was developed and its theoretical underpinnings. Additionally, we provide key terminology and an overview of the chapters’ content.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Afifi, W. A. & Cornejo, M. (2020). #CommSoWEIRD: The questions of sample representativeness in interpersonal communication research. In Doerfel, M. L. & Gibbs, J. L. (eds.), Organizing Inclusion: Moving Diversity from Demographics to Communication Process (pp. 238259). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Psychological Association. (2020). “We are living in a racism pandemic,” says APA president. American Psychological Association. www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2020/05/racism-pandemicGoogle Scholar
Bodenmann, G., Randall, A. K., & Falconier, M. K. (2016). Coping in couples: The systemic transactional model (STM). In Falconier, M. K., Randall, A. K., & Bodenmann, G. (eds.), Couples Coping with Stress: A Cross-Cultural Perspective (pp. 522). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brooks, V. R. (1981). Minority Stress and Lesbian Women. Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 12411299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, M. A., & Randall, A. K. (2023). Editorial synthesis for 2 in 2023: A collaboration between IARR’s two journals: Recognizing the need for greater inclusivity in relationship science. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(3), 717733. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075231154322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconier, M. K., Jackson, J. B., Hilpert, P., & Bodenmann, G. (2015). Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 2846. https://doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.07.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, S. C., Schacter, H. L., Timmons, A. C., Kim, Y., Sichko, S., Pettit, C., & Margolin, G. (2021). Romantic partner presence and physiological responses in daily life: Attachment style as a moderator. Biological Psychology, 161, 108082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108082CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hilpert, P., Randall, A. K., Sorokowski, P., Atkins, D. C., Sorokowska, A., Ahmadi, K., et al. (2016). The associations of dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction vary between and within nations: A 35-nation study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1106. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01106Google Scholar
Meyer, I. H. (1995). Minority stress and mental health in gay men. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36, 3856. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674697. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/00332909.129.5.674CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muthukrishna, M., Bell, A. V., Henrich, J., Curtin, C. M., Gedranovich, A., McInerney, J., & Thue, B. (2020). Beyond Western, Educated, Industrial, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) psychology: Measuring and mapping scales of cultural and psychological distance. Psychological Science, 31(6), 678701. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620916782CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogolsky, B. G., & Monk, J. K. (eds.) (2019). Relationship Maintenance: Theory, Process, and Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, A. M., Blair, K. L., & Lannutti, P. J. (2022). A review of two decades of LGBTQ-inclusive research in JSPR and PR. Personal Relationships, 30, 144173. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, A. K., Leon, G., Basili, E., Martos, T., Boiger, M., Baldi, M., et al. (2022). Coping with global uncertainty: Perceptions of COVID-19 psychological distress, relationship quality, and dyadic coping for romantic partners across 27 countries. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39(1), 333. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211034236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, A. K. & Messerschmitt, S. (2019). Dyadic coping as relationship maintenance. In Ogolsky, B. & Monk, J. K. (eds.), Relationship Maintenance: Theory, Process, and Context (pp. 178193). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, A. K., Totenhagen, C. J., Walsh, K. J., Adams, C., & Tao, C. (2017). Coping with workplace minority stress: Associations between dyadic coping and anxiety among women in same-sex relationships. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 21(1), 7087. https://doi.org/10.1080/10894160.2016.1142353CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rostosky, S. S., & Riggle, E. D. B. (2017). Same-sex relationships and minority stress. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 2938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarno, E. L., Bundy, C., Dyar, C., & Newcomb, M. E. (2021). Examining minority stress, dyadic coping, and internalizing symptoms among male same-sex couples using actor–partner interdependence models. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 68(5), 515525. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000542CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldinger, R. J., & Schulz, M. S. (2023). The Good Life: Lessons from the World’s Longest Study of Happiness. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Williamson, H. C., Bornstein, J. X., Cantu, V., Ciftci, O., Farnish, K. A., & Schouweiler, M. T. (2022). How diverse are the samples used to study intimate relationships? A systematic review. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39(4), 10871109. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211053849CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×