Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-k2jvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-09T03:36:49.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Conducting Multi-nation Research

Methodological and Statistical Considerations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2025

By
Tamás Martos ,
Orsolya Rosta-Filep ,
Gabriel A. León ,
Kata Orbán  and
Barani Kanth
Edited by
Ashley K. Randall  and
Pamela J. Lannutti
Ashley K. Randall
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Pamela J. Lannutti
Affiliation:
Widener University, Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

This chapter presents considerations when conducting multi-nation research, with a particular focus on research conducted with sexual minority and gender diverse (SMGD) communities. Specifically, this chapter provide a nonexhaustive list of best practices from idea development, including forming multi-nation research teams, to practical challenges of the research process, such as questions of cross-cultural reliability and validity of chosen methods, and challenges of recruitment and data collection. Additionally, reference is made to specific methodological aspects, including missing data analysis and common analytical procedures, such as multilevel modeling. Examples and aspects of reflective practices, such as reflections on positionality, the impact of cultural and ethical aspects on the research process, and sources of bias and how research teams may make efforts to overcome them, are also presented.

Keywords

Multi-nation researchsexual minoritygender diversereflective research practicecultural considerations
Type
Chapter
Information
Experiences of Sexual Minority and Gender Diverse Individuals in Romantic Relationships
Heeding a Global Call
 , pp. 8 - 32
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abboud, S., Veldhuis, C., Ballout, S., Nadeem, F., Nyhan, K., & Hughes, T. (2022). Sexual and gender minority health in the Middle East and North Africa region: A scoping review. International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances, 4, 100085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2022.100085CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. www.apa.org/ethics/code/Google Scholar
American Psychological Association. (2023a). APA PsycTests. www.apa.org/pubs/databases/psyctestsGoogle Scholar
American Psychological Association. (2023b). Tips for determining authorship credit. www.apa.org/science/leadership/students/authorship-paperGoogle Scholar
Andrews, K., Parekh, J., & Peckoo, S. (2019). A guide to incorporating a racial and ethnic equity perspective throughout the research process. Child Trends. www.childtrends.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/RacialEthnicEquityPerspective_ChildTrends_October2019.pdfGoogle Scholar
Antonio, M. G., Schick-Makaroff, K., Doiron, J. M., Sheilds, L., White, L., & Molzahn, A. (2020). Qualitative data management and analysis within a data repository. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 42(8), 640–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945919881706CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arafat, S., Chowdhury, H., Qusar, M., & Hafez, M. (2016). Cross cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of research instruments: A methodological review. Journal of Behavioral Health, 5(3), 129. https://doi.org/10.5455/jbh.20160615121755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barchi, F., Kasimatis Singleton, M., & Merz, J. F. (2014). Fostering IRB collaboration for review of international research. The American Journal of Bioethics, 14(5), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2014.892168CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berry, J. W. (1989). Imposed etics–emics–derived etics: The operationalization of a compelling idea. International Journal of Psychology, 24(6), 721–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207598908247841Google Scholar
Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H., & Dasen, P. R. (2002). Cross-Cultural Psychology: Research and Applications, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bhugra, D. (2004). Migration, distress and cultural identity. British Medical Bulletin, 69(1), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldh007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borsa, J. C., Damásio, B. F., & Bandeira, D. R. (2012). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of psychological instruments: Some considerations. Paidéia, 22, 423–432. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-863X2012000300014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowden, A., & Fox-Rushby, J. A. (2003). A systematic and critical review of the process of translation and adaptation of generic health-related quality of life measures in Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, South America. Social Science & Medicine, 57(7), 1289–1306. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00503-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: Attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28, 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brühlmann, F., Petralito, S., Aeschbach, L. F., & Opwis, K. (2020). The quality of data collected online: An investigation of careless responding in a crowdsourced sample. Methods in Psychology, 2, 100022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2020.100022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B. M., & Watkins, D. (2003). The issue of measurement invariance revisited. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(2), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022102250225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, C. (2019). What’s next for registered reports? Nature, 573(7773), 187–189. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02674-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheung, F. M., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leong, F. T. L. (2011). Toward a new approach to the study of personality in culture. American Psychologist, 66(7), 593–603. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuccolo, K., Irgens, M. S., Zlokovich, M. S., Grahe, J., & Edlund, J. E. (2021). What crowdsourcing can offer to cross-cultural psychological science. Cross-Cultural Research, 55(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397120950628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, M. A., & Randall, A. K. (2021). Positionality Statements. Wiley. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/pb-assets/assets/14756811/Positionality-Statements-1621354517813.pdfGoogle Scholar
Curran, M. A., & Randall, A. K. (2023). Editorial synthesis for 2 in 2023: A collaboration between IARR’s two journals: Recognizing the need for greater inclusivity in relationship science. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(3), 717–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075231154322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, M. A., Young, V. J., Kayabol, N. B. A., & Totenhagen, C. J. (2023). A systematic review of relationship sacrifices from 2002 to 2021: Moving toward inclusivity. Personal Relationships, 30(1), 76–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, P. G. (2016). Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020). Data Feminism. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidov, E. (2008). A cross-country and cross-time comparison of the human values measurements with the second round of the European Social Survey. Survey Research Methods, 2(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.18148/SRM/2008.V2I1.365Google Scholar
Du Preez, J. (2008). Locating the researcher in the research: Personal narrative and reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 9(4), 509–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940802431499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyar, C., Kaysen, D., Newcomb, M. E., & Mustanski, B. (2022). Event-level associations among minority stress, coping motives, and substance use among sexual minority women and gender diverse individuals. Addictive Behavior, 134, 107397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107397CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elmer, E. M., van Tilburg, T., & Fokkema, T. (2022). Minority stress and loneliness in a global sample of sexual minority adults: The roles of social anxiety, social inhibition, and community involvement. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(4), 2269–2298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02132-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enders, C. (2022). Applied Missing Data Analysis, 2nd ed. The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, W. A., Donahue, K. L., Long, J. S., Heiman, J. R., Rosen, R. C., & Sand, M. S. (2015). Individual and partner correlates of sexual satisfaction and relationship happiness in midlife couples: Dyadic analysis of the international survey of relationships. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1609–1620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0426-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flatt, J. D., Cicero, E. C., Kittle, K. R., & Brennan-Ing, M. (2022). Recommendations for advancing research with sexual and gender minority older adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 77(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbab127CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forscher, P. S., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Coles, N. A., Silan, M. A., Dutra, N., Basnight-Brown, D., & IJzerman, H. (2023). The benefits, barriers, and risks of big-team science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(3), 607–623. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221082970CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gabb, J., & Singh, R. (2015). Reflections on the challenges of understanding racial, cultural, and sexual differences in couple relationship research. Journal of Family Therapy, 37(2), 210–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12044CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, J. W. (2008). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 549–576. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardwicke, T. E., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2018). Mapping the universe of registered reports. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(11), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0444-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hearn, J. (2015). Transnational reflections on transnational research projects on men, boys and gender relations. NORMA, 10(2), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2015.1050858CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedges, L. V., & Hedberg, E. C. (2007). Intraclass correlation values for planning group-randomized trials in education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29(1), 60–87. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373707299706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hilpert, P., Randall, A. K., Sorokowski, P., Atkins, D. C., Sorokowska, A., Ahmadi, K., et al. (2016). The associations of dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction vary between and within nations: A 35-nation study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1106), 1–16. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01106Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture and organizations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 10(4), 15–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.1980.11656300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hox, J., Moerbeek, M., & van de Schoot, R. (2017). Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications, 3rd ed. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, F. L. (2018). Multilevel modeling myths. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(3), 492. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000272CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IARR. (2023, January 30). International Association for Relationship Research: Internationalization Statement. www.iarr.org/img/committees/internationalization/IARR%20Internationalization%20statement_30jan23.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ilesanmi, O. O. (2009). What is cross-cultural research? International Journal of Psychological Studies, 1(2), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v1n2p82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izienicki, H. (2021). When does sexuality matter? Cross-cultural analysis of gay identity. Sociological Perspectives, 64(3), 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121420950842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jafar, A. J. N. (2018). What is positionality and should it be expressed in quantitative studies? Emergency Medicine Journal, 35(5), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-207158CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jarke, H., Anand-Vembar, S., Alzahawi, S., Andersen, T. L., Bojanić, L., Carstensen, A., et al. (2022). A roadmap to large-scale multi-country replications in psychology. Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), 57538. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.57538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, S., & Lee, Y. (2019). Consequences of not conducting measurement invariance tests in cross-cultural studies: A review of current research practices and recommendations. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 21(4), 466–483. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422319870726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanth, B., van Dulmen, M. H., & De Luca Bishop, H. (2021). Psychometric validation and cross-cultural comparison of the Romantic Inclination Scale. Personal Relationships, 28(4), 748–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanth, B., van Dulmen, M. H. M., & DeLuca Bishop, H. K. (2023). Cross-cultural variations in romantic and sexual attitudes and experiences among young adults in India and the USA. Current Psychology, 42, 22184–22199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03308-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic Data Analysis. Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Lai, M. H. C., & Kwok, O. (2015). Examining the rule of thumb of not using multilevel modeling: The “design effect smaller than two” rule. The Journal of Experimental Education, 83(3), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2014.907229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindemann, T., & Häberlein, L. (2023). Contours of a research ethics and integrity perspective on open science. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 8. www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frma.2023.1052353CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2020). Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Manohar, N., Bhole, S., Liamputtong, P., & Arora, A. (2017). Researcher positionality in cross-cultural and sensitive research. In Liamputtong, P. (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences (pp. 1–15). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_35-1Google Scholar
Martínez, C., Costa, A. B., & Tomicic, A. (2023). Development of a collaborative network: Latin-American network for research in psychotherapy and mental health in sexual and gender diversity. Trends in Psychology, 31, 548–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-022-00204-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matson, M., Macapagal, K., Kraus, A., Coventry, R., Bettin, E., Fisher, C. B., & Mustanski, B. (2019). Sexual and gender minority youth’s perspectives on sharing de-identified data in sexual health and HIV prevention research. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 16(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178–018-0372-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matsumoto, D., & Juang, L. (2013). Culture and Psychology. Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D., Yoo, S. H., & Fontaine, J. (2008). Mapping expressive differences around the world: The relationship between emotional display rules and individualism versus collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022107311854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, M. N. (2018). Practical tips for ethical data sharing. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917747656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milfont, T. L., & Fischer, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison-Smith, S., & Ruiz, J. (2020). Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: A literature review. SN Applied Sciences, 2(6), 1096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2801-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moshontz, H., Campbell, L., Ebersole, C. R., IJzerman, H., Urry, H. L., Forscher, P. S., et al. (2018). The psychological science accelerator: Advancing psychology through a distributed collaborative network. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918797607CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosek, B. A., Hardwicke, T. E., Moshontz, H., Allard, A., Corker, K. S., Dreber, A., et al. (2022). Replicability, robustness, and reproducibility in psychological science. Annual Review of Psychology, 73(1), 719–748. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114157CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pachankis, J. E., & Bränström, R. (2018). Hidden from happiness: Structural stigma, sexual orientation concealment, and life satisfaction across 28 countries. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 86(5), 403–415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000299CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paxton, A., & Tullett, A. (2019). Open science in data-intensive psychology and cognitive science. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732218790283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, A. M., Blair, K. L., & Lannutti, P. J. (2023). A review of two decades of LGBTQ-INCLUSIVE research in JSPR and PR. Personal Relationships, 30(1), 144–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puthillam, A., Montilla Doble, L. J., Delos Santos, J. J. I., Elsherif, M. M., Steltenpohl, C. N., Moreau, D., et al. (2024). Guidelines to improve internationalization in the psychological sciences. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 18(1), e12847. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, A. K., Donato, S., Neff, L. A., Totenhagen, C. J., Bodenmann, G., & Falconier, M. (2023). A scoping review on couples’ stress and coping literature: Recognizing the need for inclusivity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(3), 812–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221101904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, A. K., León, G. L., Basili, E., Martos, T., Boiger, M., Baldi, M., et al. (2022). Coping with global uncertainty: Perceptions of COVID-19 psychological distress, relationship quality, and dyadic coping for romantic partners across 27 countries. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211034236refleCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricks, J. M., Arthur, E. K., Stryker, S. D., Yockey, R. A., Anderson, A. M., & Allensworth-Davies, D. (2022). A systematic literature review of community-based participatory health research with sexual and gender minority communities. Health Equity, 6(1), 640–657. https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2022.0039CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, S. O., Bareket-Shavit, C., Dollins, F. A., Goldie, P. D., & Mortenson, E. (2020). Racial inequality in psychological research: Trends of the past and recommendations for the future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(6), 1295–1309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620927709CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosser, B. R. S., Maticka-Tyndale, E., & Ross, M. W. (2021). Ethical challenges in international and global research. In Panicker, S. & Stanley, B. (eds.), Handbook of Research Ethics in Psychological Science (pp. 125–138). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000258-009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenkamp, J. B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1086/209528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, M. A., Shaffer, M., Echo-Hawk, A., Smith, J., Stapleton, A., & Melvin, A. (2015). Research START: A multimethod study of barriers and accelerators of recruiting research participants. Clinical and Translational Science, 8(6), 647–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, D., Jafari, P., Knez, R., Franic, T., Atilola, O., Davidovic, N., et al. (2017). Can we really use available scales for child and adolescent psychopathology across cultures? A systematic review of cross-cultural measurement invariance data. Transcultural Psychiatry, 54(1), 125–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461516689215CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Syed, M., & Kathawalla, U.-K. (2022). Cultural psychology, diversity, and representation in open science. In McLean, K. C. (ed.). Cultural Methods in Psychology: Describing and Transforming Cultures (pp. 427–454). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190095949.003.0015Google Scholar
Tajima, E. A. (2021). First, do no harm: From diversity and inclusion to equity and anti-racism in interpersonal violence research and scholarship. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(11–12), 4953–4987. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211012999CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Totenhagen, C. J., Randall, A. K., Bar-Kalifa, E., Ciftci, O., & Gleason, M. (2023a). Daily stress and relationship quality: A two-decade scoping review from an intersectional lens. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(3), 773–811. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221095870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Totenhagen, C. J., Randall, A. K., León, G. A., & Carroll, M. (2023b). Dyadic coping inventory: Sexual minority stress: A scale validation with lesbian, gay, and bi+ men and women in same- and different-gender couples. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (2004). Cultural syndromes. In Spielberger, C. D. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology (pp. 555–560). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-657410-3/00196-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ummak, E., Toplu-Demirtaş, E., & Jessen, R. S. (2022). Untangling the relationship between internalized heterosexism and psychological intimate partner violence perpetration: A comparative study of lesbians and bisexual women in Türkiye and Denmark. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(15–16), NP14337–NP14367. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211004108CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VandenBos, G. R. (ed.). (2015). APA Dictionary of Psychology, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vazire, S., Schiavone, S. R., & Bottesini, J. G. (2022). Credibility beyond replicability: Improving the four validities in psychological science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(2), 162–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211067779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Matsumoto, D. (2011). Introduction to the methodological issues associated with cross-cultural research. In Matsumoto, D., & van de Vivjer, F. (eds.), Cross-Cultural Research Methods in Psychology (pp. 1–14). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wagaman, M. A., Obejero, R. C., & Gregory, J. S. (2018). Countering the norm, (re)authoring our lives: The promise counterstorytelling holds as a research methodology with LGBTQ youth and beyond. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 1609406918800646. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918800646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walch, S. E., Bernal, D. R., Gibson, L., Murray, L., Thien, S., & Steinnecker, K. (2020). Systematic review of the content and methods of empirical psychological research on LGBTQ and SGM populations in the new millennium. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 7, 433–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, W. S., & Given, L. M. (2019). Assessing intercultural communication: Testing technology tools for information sharing in multinational research teams. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(4), 338–350. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worthen, M. G., Lingiardi, V., & Caristo, C. (2017). The roles of politics, feminism, and religion in attitudes toward LGBT individuals: A cross-cultural study of college students in the USA, Italy, and Spain. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 14, 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-016-0244-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×