Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:19:51.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 30 - Calocedrus

Cupressales: Cupressaceae S.S.

from Part III - Living Arborescent Gymnosperm Genetic Presentations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2024

Christopher N. Page
Christopher N. Page
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Get access

Summary

Monoecious or occasionally dioecious evergreen trees, with a typically conical, narrowly to broadly tapering crown. The bright yellow–green typically cupressoid foliage of moderately large scale leaves is held in mostly radially vertical sprays.

Type
Chapter
Information
Evolution of the Arborescent Gymnosperms
Pattern, Process and Diversity
 , pp. 525 - 536
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achard, F., Eva, H.D., Stibig, H.J. et al. 2002. Determination of deforestation rates of the world’s humid tropical forests. Science 297: 999–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adams, E.M. & Morrison, M.L. 1993. Effects of forest stand structure and composition on red-breasted nuthatches and brown creepers. Journal of Wildlife Management 62: 616–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, E.B. 2009. Soil and vegetation difference from peridotite to serpentine. Northeastern Naturalist 16: 178–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anstey, J.-A.S. & Battles, J.J. 1998. Forest composition, structure, and change in an old-growth mixed conifer forest in the northern Sierra Nevada. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 125: 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arno, S.F. 1973. Discovering Sierra Trees. Yosemite Assn.Google Scholar
Averyanov, L.V., Nguyen, T.H., Phan, K.L. & Pham, V.T. 2008. The genus Calocedrus (Cupressaceae) in the flora of Vietnam. Taiwania 53: 11–12.Google Scholar
Bawa, K.S. & Ashton, P.S. 1991. Conservation of rare trees in tropical rain forests: a genetic perspective. Pp 62–71 in Falk, D.A. and Holsinger, K.E. (eds.), Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaty, R.M. & Taylor, A.H. 2001. Spatial and temporal variation of fire regimes in a mixed conifer forest landscape, Southern Cascades, California, USA. Journal of Biogeography 28: 955–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunsfeld, S.J., Soltis, P.S., Soltis, D.E., Gadek, P.A. & Quinn, C.J. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships amongst the genera of the Taxodicaeae and Cupressaceae: evidence from rbcL sequences. Systematic Botany 19: 253–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, H.-T., Cheng, Y.-H., Wu, C.-L., et al. 2008. Antifungal activity from Calocedrus macrolepis var. formosana Florin leaf against plant pathogenic fungi. Bioresource Technology 99: 6266–6270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, C.-H., Huang, J.-P., Tsai, C.-C. & Chaw, S.-M. 2009. Phylogeny of Calocedrus (Cupressaceae), an Eastern Asian and Western North American disjunct gymnosperm genus, inferred from nuclear ribosomal nrITS sequences. Botanical Bulletin of Academica Sinica 50: 435–440.Google Scholar
Cheng, S.-S., Wu, C.-L., Chang, H.-T., Kao, Y.-T. & Chang, S.-T. 2004. Antitermitic and anti-fungal activities of essential oil of Calocedrus formosana leaf and its composition. Journal of Chemical Ecology 30: 1957–1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, S.-S., Chang, H.-T., Wu, C.-L. & Chang, S.-T. 2007. Anti-termitic activities of essential oils from coniferous trees against Coptotermes formosanus. Bioresource Technology 98: 456–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chien, P.D., Zuidema, P.A. & Nghia, N.H. 2008. Conservation prospects for threatened Vietnamese tree species: results from a demographic study. Population Ecology 50: 227–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, J.-D. & Ku, S.-R. 2005. Reproductive cycles of Calocedrus formosana. Taiwan Journal of Forest Science 20: 315–329.Google Scholar
Cole, K.L. 1983. Late Pleistocene vegetation of Kings Canyon, California. Quaternary Research 19: 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, J.-M., Hsu, K.-C. & Cheng, Y.-S. 1989. Terpenoids from leaves of Calocedrus formosana. Phytochemistry 28: 1173–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farjon, A. 2010. A Handbook of the World’s Conifers. Leiden: Konninklijke Brill NV.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FIPI (Forest Inventory and Planning Institute, Vietnam). 1996. Vietnam Forest Trees. Hanoi: Agricultural Publishing House.Google Scholar
Flenley, J.R. 1984. Late Quaternary changes of vegetation and climate in the Malesian mountains. Erdwissenschaftliche Forschung 18: 261–267.Google Scholar
Gadek, P.A. & Quinn, C.J. 1985. Biflavones of the subfamily Cupressoideae, Cupressaceae. Phytochemistry 24: 267–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadek, P.A., Alpers, D.L., Heslewood, M.M. & Quinn, C.J. 2000. Relationships within Cupressaceae sensu lato: a combined morphological and molecular approach. American Journal of Botany 87: 1044–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goforth, B.R. & Minich, R.A. 2008. Densification, stand-replacement wildfire, and extirpation of mixed conifer forest in Cuyamaca Ranchio State park, southern California. Forest Ecology and management 256: 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J.R. & Critchfield, W.B. 1977. The distribution of forest trees of California. Research Paper PSW82. Pacific Southwest Forest & Range Experimental Station, USDA Forest Service.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D. & Engel, M.S. 2005. Evolution of the Insects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guarin, A. & Taylor, A.H. 2005. Drought triggered tree mortality in mixed conifer forests in Yosemite National Park, California, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 218: 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hably, L., Kvaček, Z. & Manchester, S.R. 2000. Shared taxa of land plants in the Oligocene of Europe and North America in context of Holarctic phytogeography. Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Geologica 44: 59–74.Google Scholar
Hiep, N.T., Loc, P.K., Luu, N.D.T., et al. 2004. Vietnam Conifers Conservation Status Review. Hanoi: Labour and Society Publisher.Google Scholar
Hizumae, M., Kondo, T., Shibata, F. & Ishoizuka, R. 2001. Flow cytometric determination of genome size in the Taxodiaceae, Cupressaceae sensu stricto and Sciadopityaceae. Cytologia (Tokyo) 66: 307–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hung, T.V. 2004. Forestry research for the present time. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development 12: 26–29.Google Scholar
Johnston, D.S. & Gworek, J.R. 2006. Pallid bat (Antrozous pallidus) habitat use in a coniferous forest in northeastern California. Bat Research News 47: 114.Google Scholar
Kaufman, M.R., Binkley, D., Fule, P.Z., et al. 2007. Defining old growth for fire-adapted forests of the Western United States. Ecology and Society 12: 1–2.Google Scholar
Kobziar, L., Moghaddas, J. & Stephens, S.L. 2006. Tree mortality patterns following prescribed fires in a mixed conifer forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36: 3222–3238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, W.S. 1995. The distribution of conifers and taxads in time and space in the Korean Peninsula. Journal of the Korean Geographical Society 30(1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Kong, W.S. 2000. Vegetational history of the Korean Peninsula. Global Ecology and Biogeography 9(5): 391–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruckeberg, A.R. 1984. California serpentines: flora, vegetation, geology, and management problems. University of California Publications in Botany 78: 1–180.Google Scholar
Kvaček, Z. 1999. An ancient Calocedrus (Cupressaceae) from the European Tertiary. Flora 194: 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvaček, Z. & Hably, L. 1998. New plant elements in the tard clay formation from Eger-Kiseged. Acta Palaeobotanica 38: 5–23.Google Scholar
Kvaček, Z. & Rember, W.C. 2000. Shared Miocene conifers of the Clarkia flora and Europe. Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Geologica 44: 75–85.Google Scholar
Kvaček, Z. & Walther, H. 2001. The Oligocene of central Europe and the development of forest vegetation in space and time on the basis of megafossils. Palaeontographica B, 259: 125–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvaček, Z. & Walther, H. 2003 Reconstruction of vegetation and landscape development during volcanic activity in the Ceske Stredohori Mountains. Geolines 15: 60–64.Google Scholar
Li, H.-L. 1975. Coniferae. Pp 499–544 in DeVol, C.E. (ed.), Flora of Taiwan. Vol 1. Pteridophyta and Gymnospermae. Taipei: Epoch Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Liu, J. 2000. The seed bank of the forest community at the pinnacles of Maolan Karst hilly area in Guizhou. Forest Research, Beijing 13(1): 44–50.Google Scholar
Liu, Y.S., Mohr, B.A. & Basinger, J.F. 2009. Historical biogeography of the genus Chamaecyparis (Cupressaceae, Coniferales) based on its fossil record. Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments 89: 203–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathiasen, R.L. 2009. Comparative susceptibility of conifers to knobcone pine dwarf mistletoe. Western North American Naturalist 69(1): 42–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEachern, B., Eagles-Smith, C., Efferson, C. & Van Vuren, D. 2006. Evidence for local specialization in a generalist mammalian herbivore, Neotoma fuscipes. Okios 113: 440–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIver, E.E. & Basinger, J.F. 1987. Mesocyparis borealis gen. et sp. nov.: fossil Cupressaceae from the early Tertiary of Saskatchewan, Canada. Canadian Journal of Botany 65(11): 2338–2351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, M.D., Keit, D.A. & North, M.P. 2005. Nest trees of northern flying squirrels in the Sierra Nevada. Journal of Mammalogy 86: 275–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middlekauf, W.W. 1974. Larvae of wood-boring sawfly Syntexis libocedri Rohwer (Hymenoptera: Syntexidae). Pan-Pacific Entomologist 50: 288–290.Google Scholar
Minnich, R.A., Barbour, M.G., Burk, J.H. & Fernau, R.F. 1995 Sixty years of change in California conifer forests of the San Bernardino Mountains. Conservation Biology 9: 902–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nghia, N.H. 2000. Some Threatened Tree Species of Vietnam. Hanoi: Agriculture Publisher.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Duc To Luu & Thomas, P. 2004. Cay La Kim Viet Nam (Conifers of Vietnam: An Illustrated Field Guide). Hanoi: World Publishing House.Google Scholar
Nguyen, T.H., Loc, P.K., Nguyen, D.T.L., et al. 2004. Vietnam Conifers Conservation Status Review 2004. Fauna & Flora International, Vietnam Programme. Hanoi: Labour and Society Publisher.Google Scholar
North, M., Hurteau, M., Fiegener, R. & Barbour, M. 2005. Influence of fire and El Nino on tree recruitment varies by species in Sierran mixed conifer forest. Forest Science 51: 187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otto, A., Simoneit, B.R.T. & Rember, W.C. 2005. Conifer and angiosperm biomarkers in clay sediments and fossil plants from the Miocene Clarkia Formation, Idaho, USA. Organic Geochemistry 36: 907–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rambo, T.R. 2010. Habitat preferences of an arboreal forage lichen in a Sierra Nevada old-growth mixed-conifer forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 40: 1034–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rizzo, D.M., Slaughter, G.W. & Parmeter, J.R. jr. 2000. Enlargement of canopy gaps associated with a fungal pathogen in Yosemite Valley, California. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30: 1501–1510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulmeister, S. 2003a. Review of morphological evidence on the phylogeny of basal Hymenoptera (Insecta), with a discussion of the ordering of characters. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 79: 209–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulmeister, S. 2003b. Simultaneous analysis of basal Hymenoptera (Insecta): introducing robust choice sensitivity analysis. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 79: 245–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sodhi, N.S., Koh, L.P., Brook, B.W. & Ng, P.K.L. 2004. Southeast Asian biodiversity: an impending disaster. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 654–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephens, S.L. & Finney, M.A. 2002. Prescribed fire mortality of Sierra Nevada mixed conifer tree species: effects of crown damage and forest floor combustion. Forest Ecology and Management 162: 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, Y.C., Ho, C.L., & Wang, E.I.C. 2006. Analysis of leaf essential oils from the indigenous conifers of Taiwan. Flavour and Fragrance 21: 447–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, P., Sengdala, K., Lamaxay, V. & Khou, E. 2007. New records of conifers in Cambodia and Laos. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 64: 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsai, C.-C., Chen, C.-J., Tseng, H.-W., et al. 2008. Cytomic screening of immuno-modulating activity compounds from Calocedrus formosana. Combinatorial Chemistry and High Throughput Screening 11: 834–842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vikulin, S.V., Zhilin, S.G. & Potapova, Y.Y. 1995. Leaf whorls of Cupressaceae from the Maastrichtian of central Kazakhstan. Paleontological Journal 29: 185–193.Google Scholar
Wang, D.-L., Li, Z.-C., Hao, G. Chiang, T.-Y. & Ge, X.-J. 2004a. Genetic diversity of Calocedrus macrolepis in southwestern China. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 32: 797–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S-Y., Wu, J.-H., Cheng, S.-S., et al. 2004b. Antioxidant activity of extracts from Calocedrus formosana leaf, bark, and heartwood. Journal of Wood Science 50: 422–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S.-Y., Wang, Y.-S., Tseng, Y.-H., Lin, C.-T. & Liu, C.-P. 2006. Analysis of fragrance compositions of precious coniferous woods grown in Taiwan. Holzforschung 60: 528–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmore, T.C. 1997. Tropical forest disturbance, disappearance, and species loss. Pp 3–12 in Laurance, E.R. & Bierregaard, R.O. (eds.), Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management and Conservation of Fragmented Communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wolfe, J.A. 1972. An interpretation of Alaskan Tertiary floras. Pp 201–233 in Graham, A. (ed.), Floristics and Paleofloristics of Asia and Eastern North America. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Yen, T.-B., Chang, H.-T., Hsieh, C.-C. & Chang, S.-T. 2004. Antifungal properties of ethanol extract and its active compounds from Calocedrus macrolepis var formosana (Florin) heartwood. Bioresource Technology 99: 4871–4877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
York, R.A., Heald, R.C., Battles, J.J. & York, J.D. 2004. Group selection management in conifer forests: relationships between opening size and tree growth. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34: 630–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zald, H.S.J., Gray, A.N., North, M. & Kern, R.A. 2008. Initial tree regeneration responses to fire and thinning treatments in a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest. Forest Ecology and Management 256: 168–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Calocedrus
  • Christopher N. Page, University of Exeter
  • Book: Evolution of the Arborescent Gymnosperms
  • Online publication: 11 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009262965.034
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Calocedrus
  • Christopher N. Page, University of Exeter
  • Book: Evolution of the Arborescent Gymnosperms
  • Online publication: 11 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009262965.034
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Calocedrus
  • Christopher N. Page, University of Exeter
  • Book: Evolution of the Arborescent Gymnosperms
  • Online publication: 11 November 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009262965.034
Available formats
×