Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:01:08.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Lek behavior of insects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2010

Jae C. Choe
Affiliation:
Seoul National University
Bernard J. Crespi
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University, British Columbia
Get access

Summary

(The sight of a feather in a peacock's tail, whenever I gaze at it, makes me sick

Charles Darwin (Darwin, F. 1887, vol. 2, p. 296))

ABSTRACT

We provide a general overview of lek behavior in insects. Initially, we draw a distinction between substrate–based and aerial (swarming) male mating aggregations. In general, males in substrate–based groups defend territories, wait for arriving females, and perform courtship prior to mating. By contrast, males in swarms typically exhibit no intrasexual aggression before female arrivals and grasp approaching females for immediate mating without courtship. Also, compared with swarms, substrate–based aggregations tend to be small, and males are more likely to produce long–range signals to attract females. We examine the relative importance of intra– and intersexual selection in substrate–based groups with (1) male aggression but no courtship, (2) male courtship but no aggression, and (3) both male courtship and aggression. The final category, groups most closely resembling ‘classical’ lek species, receives most attention; data from drosophilid and tephritid fruit flies are presented to show interspecific differences in the influence of male aggression and female choice on male mating success. Few data are available that address the evolutionary origins of lek behavior in insects. Among male–initiated hypotheses, it is most likely that males cluster at transit ‘hotspots’ where large numbers of females are likely to pass. There is no empirical support for the idea that clustering increases signal effectiveness and hence female arrivals on a per male basis. In addition, data regarding predation and group size do not consistently reveal reduced risks with increasing group size.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×